Physician-guided treatment compared with a heparin protocol for deep vein thrombosis

BACKGROUND: Effective heparin therapy, defined by therapeutic prolongation of the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), decreases the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism. Achieving therapeutic prolongation of the APTT within 24 hours of the start of heparin therapy has proved difficult. We hypothesized that a protocol that delivered high initial heparin infusions to patients without identifiable risk for bleeding complications would decrease the time to achieve a therapeutic anticoagulant effect without increasing the incidence of major bleeding complications. METHODS: To test this hypothesis, we studied concurrent patient cohorts. We defined a therapeutic anticoagulant effect (APTT > 55 seconds) to be an APTT more than 1.5 times the upper limit of normal. Twenty patients with acute symptomatic deep vein thrombosis received a 5000-U heparin bolus, followed by 1680 U/h (low risk to bleed) or 1240 U/h (high risk to bleed), adjusted by protocol-directed response to APTT results. Forty-eight patients with deep vein thrombosis were treated by their physicians. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to examine the proportion of patients who achieved an APTT greater than 55 seconds as a function of time. RESULTS: The two study cohorts did not differ with respect to age, weight, or risk factors for venous thromboembolism. Analysis of Kaplan-Meier curves showed that the heparin protocol decreased the time to achieve a therapeutic anticoagulant effect (P = .025). Ten (91%) of 11 patients (95% confidence interval, 59% to 100%) without risks to bleed who were treated by the heparin protocol and 29 (60%) of 48 patients (95% confidence interval, 45% to 74%) not treated by the protocol had an initial therapeutic APTT (P = .006). CONCLUSION: A protocol that delivers higher initial heparin infusions to patients without identifiable risks for bleeding decreases the time needed to achieve therapeutic prolongation of APTT, when compared with nonprotocol physician management.     

A randomized, multicenter trial of weight-adjusted intravenous heparin dose titration and point-of-care coagulation monitoring in hospitalized patients with active thromboembolic disease. Antithrombotic Therapy Consortium Investigators

BACKGROUND: Therapy with intravenous unfractionated heparin improves clinical outcome in patients with active thromboembolic disease, but achieving and maintaining a therapeutic level of anticoagulation remains a major challenge for clinicians. METHODS: A total of 113 patients requiring heparin for at least 48 hours were randomly assigned at 7 medical centers to either weight-adjusted or non-weight-adjusted dose titration. They were separately assigned to either laboratory-based or point-of-care (bedside) coagulation monitoring. RESULTS: Weight-adjusted heparin dosing yielded a higher mean activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) value 6 hours after treatment initiation than non-weight-adjusted dosing (99.9 vs 78.8 seconds; P =.002) and reduced the time required to exceed a minimum threshold (aPTT >45 seconds) of anticoagulation (10.5 vs 8.6 hours; P =.002). Point-of-care coagulation monitoring significantly reduced the time from blood sample acquisition to a heparin infusion adjustment (0.4 vs 1.6 hours; P <.0001) and to reach the therapeutic aPTT range (51 to 80 seconds) (16.1 vs 19.4 hours; P =.24) compared with laboratory monitoring. Although a majority of patients participating in the study surpassed the minimum threshold of anticoagulation within the first 12 hours and reached the target aPTT within 24 hours, maintaining the aPTT within the therapeutic range was relatively uncommon (on average 30% of the overall study period) and did not differ between treatment or monitoring strategies. CONCLUSIONS: Weight-adjusted heparin dosing according to a standardized titration nomogram combined with point-of-care coagulation monitoring using the BMC Coaguchek Plus System represents an effective and widely generalizable strategy for managing patients with thromboembolic disease that fosters the rapid achievement of a desired range of anticoagulation. Additional work is needed, however, to improve on existing patient-specific strategies that can more effectively sustain a therapeutic state of anticoagulation.     

Treatment of venous thromboembolism

There have been some important advances in the treatment of venous thromboembolism during the past 18 months. A randomized trial has confirmed earlier observations indicating an adequate initial heparin effect is required to prevent recurrent venous thromboembolism, and it is critical to achieve this effect within the first 24 hours of therapy. The need to use a validated protocol for administering intravenous heparin is now firmly established. The clinician has a choice between two protocols that have been validated by randomized trials and provide both effective and safe heparin therapy. For patients with clinically suspected pulmonary embolism, the clinician now has a practical noninvasive strategy that avoids pulmonary angiography, identifies patients with proximal-vein thrombosis who require treatment, and avoids the need for treatment and further investigation in the majority of patients.     

Inability of the activated partial thromboplastin time to predict heparin levels. Time to reassess guidelines for heparin assays

BACKGROUND: In treating venous thromboembolic disorders, patient outcomes appear to correlate with heparin levels. Due to pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variations, a relationship between heparin dose and level cannot be reliably predicted in individual patients. Some patients have low heparin levels despite therapeutic activated partial thromboplastin times (aPTTs), which may increase their risk for recurrent thromboembolism. Patients with high heparin requirements appear to have fewer bleeding episodes with heparin level-guided therapy. The aPTT does not reliably correlate with heparin blood concentrations or antithrombotic effects. Consequently, heparin therapy monitored with heparin levels may be more effective and safer. OBJECTIVES: To prospectively determine whether (1) the aPTT therapeutic range adequately predicts heparin levels in 38 patients used to establish the therapeutic aPTT range as is currently recommended and (2) whether 3 paired sets of aPTT-antifactor Xa levels provide the basis for using aPTTs to predict subsequent heparin levels in individual patients (n = 27) receiving intravenous heparin for coronary artery disease or venous thromboembolic disease. RESULTS: In the therapeutic aPTT range established, the R2 value for the relationship was 0.4. Prediction intervals were wide. For an aPTT of 60 seconds, the 95% prediction interval estimates were heparin levels of 0.05 to 1.0 U/mL. In individual patients, the aPTT-antifactor Xa relationship had an average R2 value of 0.75. There was no consistent relationship between the aPTT and anti-factor Xa level in a significant number of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The aPTT does not appear to be a useful surrogate for heparin levels. These findings suggest that the current recommendations on the use of heparin levels should be expanded.     

Weight-based heparin dosing: clinical response and resource utilization

The objective of this study was to assess a weight-based heparin (WBH) nomogram (80-U/kg bolus, 18-U/kg-per-hour initial infusion) and determine its clinical performance and impact on resource utilization. All patients treated with heparin for venous thromboembolism or unstable angina during a 15-week study period were included in this retrospective, chart-review study. Three groups were identified: patients treated with WBH, patients whose regimen deviated from the weight-based nomogram (DEV), and matched historical controls (HCs). In patients receiving heparin for more than 24 hours, those treated with WBH achieved threshold activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) levels significantly faster than did HC or DEV patients. However, 42% of WBH-treated patients were found to have initial supratherapeutic responses. Logistic regression analysis identified age > or =67 years, prior warfarin therapy within 7 days of heparin, and high initial infusion rate as predictive of a supratherapeutic aPTT response; smoking was predictive of a subtherapeutic response. Bleeding events were not significantly different between groups. An infusion rate of 15 U/kg per hour was found to closely approximate our population's actual heparin infusion requirement. Resource utilization was significantly different between the WBH and HC groups in terms of nursing interventions at 48 to 72 hours. We concluded that WBH rapidly drives patients' aPTT response above the therapeutic threshold for heparin; however, prudent adjustment of the initial infusion rate is necessary to avoid a supratherapeutic aPTT response. Our data support a nomogram with an initial infusion rate of 15 U/kg per hour.     

Aging and heparin-related bleeding

BACKGROUND: Many studies have suggested that elderly patients are at increased risk of bleeding during heparin therapy. OBJECTIVE: To establish whether the risk of bleeding in the elderly results from concomitant risk factors or is associated with the aging process itself. METHODS: One hundred ninety-nine patients who presented with proximal deep vein thrombosis were treated with a standard intravenous heparin protocol in a double-blind, randomized, prospective study. Bleeding complications were monitored. Activated partial thromboplastin times and heparin levels were assessed 4 to 6 hours after a standard intravenous heparin bolus and infusion. Heparin doses and heparin levels were also assessed after stable therapeutic heparin infusion rates were established. RESULTS: There was an increase in total and major bleeding complications with aging (P < .05) that was not accounted for by standard risk factors for bleeding. Aging was associated with an increase in heparin levels (r = .239, P = .003) and a tendency for an increase in activated partial thromboplastin time (r = .134, P = .07) after standard heparin doses. Aging was also associated with lower heparin dose requirements (r = .267, P = .003) after therapeutic activated partial thromboplastin times were achieved. CONCLUSION: Aging is a risk for heparin-related bleeding that may be explicable by age-related changes in the pharmacologic characteristics of heparin.     

Effect of warfarin on activated partial thromboplastin time in patients receiving heparin

BACKGROUND: The activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) is used to adjust heparin sodium dosage. However, warfarin sodium is often administered concomitantly with heparin and may also affect the APTT and, therefore, heparin dose. We performed a prospective cohort study to quantify the effect of warfarin on the APTT in patients who are being treated with heparin. METHODS: Serial assays of APTT, international normalized ratio, heparin levels, and functional levels of prothrombin (factor II) and factors VII and X were performed in 24 patients with acute venous thromboembolism who were treated with concomitant continuous intravenous heparin and warfarin. The effects of warfarin, as expressed by international normalized ratio and coagulation factor levels, on APTT were determined. RESULTS: Warfarin markedly affected APTT; for each increase of 1.0 in the international normalized ratio, the APTT increased 16 seconds (95% confidence interval, 10-22 seconds). The effects of warfarin and heparin on APTT were additive. Consequently, warfarin markedly altered the relationship between APTT and heparin levels; of the 29 blood samples with supratherapeutic APTT, 13 had a therapeutic heparin level and 10 had a subtherapeutic heparin level. CONCLUSIONS: In patients receiving concomitant heparin and warfarin therapy, APTT reflects the combined effects of both drugs. Because of the marked effect of warfarin on the APTT, decreasing heparin dose in response to a high APTT frequently results in subtherapeutic heparin levels.     

Risks of anticoagulation therapy after experimental corticectomy in the rat

To determine the optimal postoperative interval after which heparin therapy can be safely initiated, a rat model for experimental craniotomy and corticectomy was developed. In 50 rats (100 lesions), heparin therapy was initiated 1, 2, 3, 5, or 7 days after standardized bilateral frontal corticectomy and was continued for 7 days. Intraperitoneally administered heparin, 75 to 100 U/kg.h, was continuously given to maintain the activated partial thromboplastin time in one of two ranges: therapeutic (1.5-3 times control) or supratherapeutic (> 3 times control). The size of intracranial hemorrhage was determined from coronal brain sections by automated image analysis. No significant hemorrhage was observed in control (saline infusion) animals or in rats receiving therapeutic doses of heparin beginning more than 24 hours after surgery. Small (10-50 mm3) and large (> 50 mm3) hemorrhages were frequent at all intervals up to 5 days in animals with supratherapeutic activated partial thromboplastin time (P < 0.01). Judicious heparin therapy may be safely initiated at 48 hours after craniotomy and corticectomy in rats, whereas supratherapeutic anticoagulation is associated with intracranial hemorrhage at intervals of up to 5 days.     

Anticoagulant therapy with recombinant hirudin in patients with thrombopenia induced by heparin

OBJECTIVES: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is an uncommon and severe complication of heparin therapy. Both venous and arterial thromboembolic events can occur, requiring withdrawal of the heparin therapy. When anticoagulant therapy is mandatory, recombinant hirudin can be used. METHODS: We used recombinant hirudin (HBW 023) in 6 patients with heparin induced thrombocytopenia. In case of venous thromboembolism, an initial intravenous bolus (0.07 mg/kg) was followed by continuous infusion (0.05 mg/kg/h); for arterial thromboembolism the initial bolus was 0.7 mg/kg and infusion rate 0.15 mg/kg/h. When possible oral anticoagulants were started and hirudin withdrawn when the INR ratio reached 3. RESULTS: The clinical course was uneventful in all 6 patients. There was no recurrent thromboembolism. Cephalin-activated coagulation time (patient/control) varied between 1.8 and 3.5 (median 2.4) during hirudin administration. Platelet count rose to the nadir (median 70 x 10(9)/l, range 15-90) reaching over 100 x 10(9)/l in all patients between the third and sixth day (median 5 days) after stopping heparin. CONCLUSION: Intravenous administration of hirudin provides effective immediate anticoagulation in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, thus allowing conversion to oral anticoagulants without risking recurrent thromboembolism.     

Binding of anti-double stranded (ds) DNA-positive sera to denatured (d) DNA and synthetic poly[dA-dT] x poly[dA-dT] double stranded copolymer in an ELISA format

Full dose heparin therapy is monitored by a variety of laboratory methods, of which the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) is the most popular. A large number of APTT reagents are currently available, with different sensitivities to heparin evident in many. Within the literature it is apparent that there is a lack of consensus, and indeed some confusion, regarding the therapeutic ranges for the APTT for standard heparin therapy in the treatment of venous thromboembolic disease. Accordingly we conducted an Australasian survey to evaluate current laboratory and clinical practices in monitoring heparin therapy, to determine the extent of variation in the approach and to stimulate the process of standardisation of acceptable procedures and methodology. Results of the survey demonstrate that currently there is no uniform practice used to establish therapeutic ranges for monitoring standard heparin therapy. Furthermore, results suggest that current practice may lead to subtherapeutic anticoagulation in many laboratories.     

Automated heparin-delivery system to control activated partial thromboplastin time: evaluation in normal volunteers

BACKGROUND: Unfractionated heparin is used widely; however, control of the level of anticoagulation remains its greatest problem, with fewer than 35% of patients having activated partial thromboplastin times (aPTTs) within a range of 55 to 85 seconds in recent trials. METHODS AND RESULTS: We developed and tested a prototype of an automated heparin control system (AutoHep) in which a computer-based titration algorithm adjusted the heparin infusion to reach a target aPTT. In 1 study, 12 healthy male subjects received an intravenous infusion of heparin with the rate determined by AutoHep and were randomized to receive an initial bolus or no bolus of heparin preceding the infusion. A second study evaluated the automated blood sampling system in 12 subjects. Of the 344 end-point aPTT measurements, 78% were within +/-10 seconds of the target (prespecified primary end point), and 89% were within a +/-15-second range. The time to achieve a target aPTT was 93 minutes without and 150 minutes with an initial heparin bolus. The total percentage of time within the target range +/-15 seconds was 46 of 48 hours (96%). The automatic blood sampling system successfully obtained 96% of all scheduled samples. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the AutoHep system has the potential to significantly improve aPTT control of intravenous heparin compared with current clinical practice.     

Low-dose heparin thromboembolism prophylaxis

OBJECTIVE: To determine a rational approach to heparin dosing for thromboembolism prophylaxis. DESIGN: Literature review. RESULTS: Three commonly used heparin dosing regimens were identified: (1) standard low-dose heparin (5000 U administered subcutaneously 2-3 times per day); (2) adjusted-dose heparin (adequate to elevate the activated partial thromboplastin time to 5 seconds above the upper limit of normal); and (3) low-molecular-weight heparin (30 mg subcutaneously twice daily without monitoring). CONCLUSIONS: Adjusted-dose heparin thromboembolism prophylaxis is both the safest and most reliable method currently available.     

Glucosamine

We have taken a stepwise approach to improving the dosing of continuous intravenous heparin in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Our primary objective was to use computer modeling to develop a nomogram for managing heparin therapy and to put in place a continuous quality monitoring system to evaluate the nomogram's effectiveness. We prospectively collected data on 41 patients with unstable angina or myocardial infarction who were treated with heparin. Their response to heparin was computer modeled and the dose to achieve an activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) ratio of 2.0 was established. This dose was regressed against all demographic characteristics to establish predictors of heparin dose (phase I). The regression formula was used prospectively in 110 patients to initiate the infusion rate of heparin and a bolus dose to achieve an aPTT ratio of 2.5. Subsequent dosage adjustments were achieved by computer modeling the patient's aPTT response (phase II). A nomogram was developed that simulated the decisions achieved using computer-assisted methods. This was retrospectively tested and then prospectively tested in 50 patients using nursing staff (phase IV). The nomogram was then made generally available (phase IV) and has been tested in an additional 310 patients. Phase I: Of the original 41 patients, 32% of the aPTT ratios were in the therapeutic range, 36% were supratherapeutic, and 32% were subtherapeutic after the first 24 hours. Phases II and III resulted in 85% of the aPTT ratios between 1.5 and 2.5 at 24 hours. Phase 4 had similar results in 310 patients. The use of computer-assisted or a computer-generated nomogram to adjust heparin therapy results in better control of heparin therapy than using standard methods.     

Changes in plasma epinephrine concentration and in heart rate during head-up tilt testing in patients with neurocardiogenic syncope: correlation with successful therapy with beta-receptor antagonists

OBJECTIVE: To develop, implement and evaluate an effective and efficient heparin nomogram. DESIGN: Retrospective and prospective data collection. SETTING: Coronary care unit (CCU) of a university-affiliated hospital. PATIENTS: Patients with acute coronary ischemic syndromes requiring intravenous (i.v.) heparin who were not receiving thrombolytic and/or warfarin therapy. INTERVENTIONS: A retrospective chart review of 52 CCU patients receiving iv heparin provided the historical control group. The effectiveness of a heparin nomogram (5000 U bolus followed by an initial weight-based infusion of 15 U/kg/h with subsequent rate adjustments according to activated partial thromboplastin time [aPTT] results) was then prospectively assessed in a further 56 consecutive patients. MAIN RESULTS: The historical control and nomogram groups did not significantly differ with respect to age, weight, duration of therapy or total number of aPTTs drawn. Approximately 79% and 84% of patients in the control and nomogram groups, respectively, achieved an aPTT within the therapeutic range (60 to 90 s, P > 0.05), whereas 89% and 100% of control and nomogram patients, respectively, surpassed the therapeutic threshold (longer than 60 s) at some point during treatment (P = 0.009). Compared with empiric dose adjustment, the nomogram more effectively avoided periods of inadequate anticoagulation. Similarly, the time to achieve the therapeutic threshold was significantly longer in the control than in the nomogram group (8.2 +/- 5.9 versus 6.7 +/- 3.7 h, P = 0.026). No adverse bleeding events were noted in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with conventional approaches, the heparin nomogram successfully achieved and maintained adequate anticoagulation in a greater proportion of patients with acute cardiovascular diseases without the need for additional aPTT measurements.     

Reevaluation of a weight-based heparin dosing nomogram: is institution-specific modification necessary?

OBJECTIVE: To compare a heparin dosing nomogram using an initial infusion rate of 18 units/kg/h with physician-directed heparin prescribing and with a modified version of the nomogram adjusted for institution-specific data. METHODS: During consecutive phases of this cohort study, patients' intravenous heparin therapies were initiated and adjusted by using one of the following three methods: (1) physician-directed dosing, (2) a body weight-based dosing nomogram with an initial infusion rate of 18 units/kg/h, and (3) a body weight-based dosing nomogram with an initial infusion rate determined by the median dose of heparin (in units/kg/h) required to achieve therapeutic activated partial thromboplastin times (aPTTs) during the first two phases. The time required to achieve therapeutic aPTTs as well as the percentage of initial aPTTs in the therapeutic range were compared for the three phases. RESULTS: The heparin dosing nomogram in which the initial infusion rate was adjusted for our individual institution resulted in a statistically shorter median time until aPTTs were in the therapeutic range than did either the physician-directed dosing or unmodified nomogram groups (6.1 h in the modified nomogram group, 10.5 h in the physician-directed group, 21.5 h in the unmodified nomogram group; p < 0.05 for all differences). Use of the institution-specific nomogram resulted in the greatest percentage of initial aPTTs in the therapeutic range (84% in the 13 units/kg/h nomogram group vs. 47% in the physician-directed group and 18% in the 18 units/kg/h nomogram group; p < 0.05 for all differences). CONCLUSIONS: Use of a heparin dosing nomogram with an initial infusion rate of 18 units/kg/h resulted in prolongation of the time to reach therapeutic aPTTs. By modifying the nomogram for use at an individual institution, we reduced the time to achieve therapeutic range of aPTTs while still reducing the likelihood of excessive anticoagulation of patients.     

Venous thromboembolism in multiple trauma patients

Thromboembolic complications are frequent in patients with multiple trauma. The efficacy of unfractionated heparin for venous thrombosis prophylaxis has not been established. Based on limited prospective data, low-molecular-weight heparin appears to be more effective than unfractionated heparin and at least as effective as compression devices for preventing thromboembolic complications in these patients. Vena cava filters should be considered in high-risk patients who cannot receive anticoagulant therapy, but long-term filter use without concomitant anticoagulant therapy is associated with a substantial risk of recurrent thromboembolism.     

Activated partial thromboplastin time and outcome after thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: results from the GUSTO-I trial

BACKGROUND: Although intravenous heparin is commonly used after thrombolytic therapy, few reports have addressed the relationship between the degree of anticoagulation and clinical outcomes. We examined the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) in 29,656 patients in the Global Utilization of Streptokinase and t-PA for Occluded Coronary Arteries (GUSTO-I) trial and analyzed the relationship between the aPTT and both baseline patient characteristics and clinical outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: Intravenous heparin was administered as a 5000-U bolus followed by an initial infusion of 1000 U/h, with dose adjustment to achieve a target aPTT of 60 to 85 seconds. aPTTs were collected 6, 12, and 24 hours after thrombolytic administration. Higher aPTT at 24 hours was strongly related to lower patient weight (P < .00001) as well as older age, female sex, and lack of cigarette smoking (all PT< .0001). At 12 hours, the aPTT associated with the lowest 30-day mortality, stroke, and bleeding rates was 50 to 70 seconds. There was an unexpected direct relationship between the aPTT and the risk of subsequent reinfarction. There was a clustering of reinfarction in the first 10 hours after discontinuation of intravenous heparin. CONCLUSIONS: Although the relationship between aPTT and clinical outcome was confounded to some degree by the influence of baseline prognostic characteristics, aPTTs higher than 70 seconds were found to be associated with higher likelihood of mortality, stroke, bleeding, and reinfarction. These findings suggest that until proven otherwise, we should consider the aPTT range of 50 to 70 seconds as optimal with intravenous heparin after thrombolytic therapy.     

Establishing an institution-specific therapeutic range for heparin

The relationship between heparin concentration and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) in pooled plasma was compared with that in patient samples to assess the feasibility of using heparin-spiked pooled plasma in determining a therapeutic range for aPTT. Blood samples were taken from 32 patients who had been receiving intravenous unfractionated heparin sodium for more than 24 hours. The samples were stored at -70 degrees C until anti-Xa assay within three months of collection. Pooled normal plasma was spiked with unfractionated heparin sodium to produce nominal anti-Xa concentrations of 0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, and 0.5 unit/mL. Heparin concentrations and a aPTT values were measured, and the relationship between the two was determined by linear regression. For the ex vivo samples, the range of aPTT values corresponding to therapeutic heparin concentrations of 0.3-0.7 anti-Xa unit/mL was 64-106 seconds, which corresponds to an aPTT range of 2.3-3.9 times the mean of the normal range (compared with the traditionally defined therapeutic range of 1.5-2.5 times the control value). For the in vitro samples, the aPTT range corresponding to heparin concentrations of 0.3-0.7 unit/mL was 121-256 seconds, which corresponds to an aPTT range of 4.4-9.4 times the mean of the normal range. Each institution should establish a therapeutic aPTT range by calibrating aPTT values against heparin concentrations from blood samples of patients receiving intravenous heparin.     

Danaparoid in the prevention of thromboembolic complications

OBJECTIVE: To review the therapies used to prevent postoperative thromboembolic complications with a focus on the role of danaparoid, a new low-molecular-weight glycosaminoglycan. DATA SOURCES: A MEDLINE search was performed to identify pertinent English-language literature including studies, abstracts, and review articles. Key search terms included danaparoid, heparinoid, lomoparin, heparin, prophylaxis, thrombosis, embolism, thromboembolism, and thromboembolic and postoperative complications. The manufacturer of danaparoid was contracted for additional information related to this compound. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: All identified articles were reviewed for possible inclusion in this review. Comparisons primarily focused on data obtained from prospective, randomized, controlled, blind clinical trials. Another important consideration was the use of venography to determine the presence of deep venous thrombosis. DATA SYNTHESIS: Various therapies are available for the prevention of postoperative thromboembolic complications. Effective pharmacologic treatments currently available include adjusted-dose heparin, warfarin, aspirin, dextran, and low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs). Until recently, warfarin was considered the drug of choice for thromboprophylaxis in high-risk patients, including patients undergoing orthopedic surgical procedures. Because of their comparable efficacy and greater ease of use, LMWHs are gaining favor over warfarin in this patient population. In well-designed clinical trials involving patients undergoing elective total hip replacement or fractured hip surgery, danaparoid has demonstrated greater efficacy than other active treatments, including warfarin, dextran, aspirin, and heparin plus dihydroergotamine. While studies comparing danaparoid with LMWHs have not yet been published, danaparoid may be more useful in patients with heparin-associated thrombocytopenia. CONCLUSIONS: Danaparoid is an antithrombotic agent with characteristics that distinguish it from heparin and LMWHs. Based on the efficacy and safety data reviewed, danaparoid should be considered one of the drugs of choice for the prevention of thromboembolic complications in patients undergoing orthopedic hip procedures and the drug of choice for the management of any patient with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia who requires anticoagulant therapy.     

Deep-vein thrombosis

Deep-vein thrombosis is an important complication of several inherited and acquired disorders, but may also occur spontaneously. Prevention of recurrent venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism is the main reason for accurate diagnosis and adequate treatment. This seminar discusses only symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis. The diagnosis can be confirmed by objective tests in only about 30% of patients with symptoms. Venous thromboembolic complications happen in less than 1% of untreated patients in whom the presence of venous thrombosis is rejected on the basis of serial ultrasonography or ultrasonography plus either D-dimer or clinical score. Initial anticoagulant treatment (intravenous or subcutaneous heparin) should continue until oral anticoagulant treatment, started concurrently, increases the international normalised ratio above 2.0 for more than 24 h. The optimum duration of oral anticoagulant treatment is unresolved, but may be guided by the presence of temporary or persistent risk factors or presentation with recurrent venous thromboembolism.