Morphology and mechanical behavior of poly(vinyl chloride)/poly(butadiene–co–acrylonitrile) latex interpenetrating polymer networks

A series of poly(vinyl chloride)/poly(butadiene–co–acrylonitrile) interpenetrating polymer networks (IPNs), all having 50/(25–25) weight compositions, was synthesized in latex form. The latex particles were studied after each step of the two-staged polymerization and after molding or casting. Transmission electron microscopy together with dynamic mechanical spectroscopy suggest a graded composition within the latexes, in which the poly(vinyl chloride) seed latex network I forms a core that is partially penetrated by the poly(butadiene–co–acrylonitrile) network II, yielding increased amounts of poly(butadiene–co–acrylonitrile) in the shell of the latex particles.     

Poly(ether sulfone) supported hybrid poly(vinyl alcohol)–maleic acid–silicone dioxide membranes for the pervaporation separation of ethanol–water mixtures

Microporous poly(ether sulfone) (PES) supported hybrid polymer–inorganic membranes were prepared by the crosslinking of poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA), maleic acid (MA), and SiO₂ via an aqueous sol–gel route and a solution‐casting method. The membrane performance was tested for the pervaporation separation of ethanol–water mixtures from 20 to 60 °C with a feed ethanol concentration of 96 wt %. The membrane characterization results reveal that different SiO₂ loadings affected the crystallinity and roughness of the membranes. The PVA–MA–SiO₂ membrane containing 10 wt % SiO₂ showed that SiO₂ nanoparticles were well dispersed within the polymer matrix; this resulted in significant enhancements in both the flux and selectivity. The membrane achieved a high water permeability of 1202 g·μm·m^?2 h^?1 kPa^?1 and a selectivity of 1027 for the separation of a 96 wt % ethanol‐containing aqueous solution. This enhanced membrane performance might have been due to the dense crosslinking membrane network, increased free volume, and uniform distribution of SiO₂ nanoparticles. Both the water and ethanol fluxes increased with the feed water concentration and temperature. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2017 , 134 , 44839.     

Electrical properties of sorbitol‐doped poly(vinyl alcohol)–poly(acrylamide‐co‐acrylic acid) polymer membranes

Solid polymer membranes from poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) and poly(acrylamide‐co‐acrylic acid) (PAA) with varying doping ratios of sorbitol were prepared using the solution casting method. The films were examined with Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, thermogravimetric analysis, differential scanning calorimetry, and AC impedance spectroscopy. The impedance measurements showed that the ionic conductivity of PVA–PAA polymer membrane can be controlled by controlled doping of sorbitol within the polymer blends. The PVA–PAA–sorbitol membranes were found to exhibit excellent thermal properties and were stable for a wide temperature range (398–563K), which creates a possibility of using them as suitable polymers for device applications. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2013     

Graft polymerization of vinyl acetate onto starch. Saponification to starch–g–poly(vinyl alcohol)

Graft polymerizations of vinyl acetate onto granular corn starch were initiated by cobalt-60 irradiation of starch-monomer-water mixtures, and ungrafted poly(vinylacetate) was separated from the graft copolymer by benzene extraction. Conversions of monomer to polymer were quantitative at a radiation dose of 1.0 Mrad. However, over half of the polymer was present as ungrafted poly-(vinyl acetate) (grafting efficiency less than 50%), and the graft copolymer contained only 34% grafted synthetic polymer (34% add-on). Lower irradiation doses produced lower conversions of monomer to polymer and gave graft copolymers with lower % add-on. Addition of minor amounts of acrylamide, methyl acrylate, and methacrylic acid as comonomers produced only small increases in % add-on and grafting efficiency. However, grafting efficiency was increased to 70% when a monomer mixture containing about 10% methyl methacrylate was used. Grafting efficiency could be increased to over 90% if the graft polymerization of vinyl acetate-methyl methacrylate was carried out near 0°C, although conversion of monomers to polymer was low and grafted polymer contained 40-50% poly(methyl methacrylate). Selected graft copolymers were treated with methanolic sodium hydroxide to convert starch–g–poly(vinyl acetate) to starch–g–poly(vinyl alcohol). The molecular weight of the poly(vinyl alcohol) moiety was about 30,000. The solubility of starch–g–poly(vinyl alcohol) in hot water was less than 50%; however, solubility could be increased by substituting either acid-modified or hypochlorite-oxidized starch for unmodified starch in the graft polymerization reaction. Vinyl acetate was also graft polymerized onto acid-modified starch which had been dispersed and partially solubilized by heating in water. A total irradiation dose of either 1.0 or 0.5 Mrad gave starch–g–poly(vinyl acetate) with about 35% add-on, and a grafting efficiency of about 40% was obtained. A film cast from a starch–g–poly(vinyl alcohol) copolymer in which homopolymer was not removed exhibited a higher ultimate tensile strength than a comparable physical mixture of starch and poly(vinyl alcohol).     

Performances of poly(vinylidene fluoride‐co‐hexafluoropropylene) ultrafiltration membranes modified with poly(vinyl pyrrolidone)

The structure and performance of modified poly(vinylidene fluoride‐co‐hexafluoropropylene) (PVdF‐co‐HFP) ultra‐filtration membranes prepared from casting solutions with different concentrations of poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) (PVP) were investigated in this study. Membrane properties were studied in terms of membrane compaction, pure water flux (PWF), water content (WC), membrane hydraulic resistance ( R _m), protein rejection, molecular weight cut‐off (MWCO), average pore size, and porosity. PWF, WC, and thermal stability of the blend membranes increased whereas the crystalline nature and mechanical strength of the blend membranes decreased when PVP additive concentration was increased. The contact angle (CA) decreased as the PVP concentration increased in the casting solution, which indicates that the hydro‐philicity of the surface increased upon addition of PVP. The average pore size and porosity of the PVdF‐co‐HFP membrane increased to 42.82 Å and 25.12%, respectively, when 7.5 wt% PVP was blended in the casting solution. The MWCO increased from 20 to 45 kDa with an increase in PVP concentration from 0 to 7.5 wt%. The protein separation study revealed that the rejection increased as the protein molecular weight increased. The PVdF‐co‐HFP/PVP blended membrane prepared from a 7.5 wt% PVP solution had a maximum flux recovery ratio of 74.3%, which explains its better antifouling properties as compared to the neat PVdF‐co‐HFP membrane. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 55:2482–2492, 2015. © 2015 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Preparation and structure of poly(vinyl alcohol)–poly(vinyl acetate) composite porous membrane

The preparation of poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA)–poly(vinyl acetate) (PVAc) composite porous membrane was investigated by extracting PVAc with solvent from films of PVAc lattices which were obtained by the emulsion polymerization of vinyl acetate (VAc) in the presence of PVA. The formation of the porous membrane depended upon whether or not PVAc in the latex film was easily extracted with solvent. In the case of using hydrogen peroxide (HPO)–tartaric acid (TA) as an initiator, in the film of the latex which was produced from the batch method in which all ingredients of the batch were put into the reaction vessel before starting polymerization, PVAc could be extracted over 90% of total PVAc with common organic solvents. In the film of the latex which was produced from the dropwise addition method of VAc and initiator, the PVAc extraction was about 20-30%. On the other hand, in the case of using ammonium persulfate as an initiator, the desired porous membrane was not obtained. The structure of the porous membrane obtained from the latex of the batch method by using HPO—TA consisted of spherical cells which were made up of PVA and grafted PVAc or insoluble PVAc like microgels, which were not extracted with organic solvent and were connected by small pores. The PVA—PVAc composite porous membrane is permeated by n-hexane with 5.58 × 10² mL/cm²·s at 0.5 kg/cm², by benzene with only 1.33 × 10^?3mL/cm²·s even at 60 kg/cm².     

Dynamic–mechanical properties of modified poly(ethylene‐co‐vinyl acetate)

To study the relationship among relaxation peaks observed in dynamic mechanical experiments and the structure of poly(ethylene‐co‐vinyl acetate) (EVA), EVA copolymers with different substitution in the carbonyl group were synthesized. EVA was hydrolyzed to obtain poly (ethylene‐co‐vinyl alcohol) and was subsequently reacted with formic, hexanoic, and octanoic acids. The copolymers synthesized were characterized by infrared spectroscopy. Analysis of the DMA spectra of the copolymers showed that their relaxation behavior depends on the vinyl acetate concentration. The α‐ and β‐transitions were observed in EVA copolymers with 8 and 18 wt % of functional groups, and the relationship among relaxation process with the structure of polymer was investigated. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 97: 1371–1376, 2005     

Partial crosslinking method for poly(2,6‐dimethyl‐1,4‐phenylene oxide)–poly(vinyl alcohol) membranes to obtain optimized stability and permeability

A partial crosslinking method was developed to modify hydrophilic membranes. The membrane was sandwiched between two porous plates to protect part of the areas, then immersed into a crosslinking solution such as glutaraldehyde, and finally, set free from the plates. The protected and unprotected areas were alternatively distributed to form a heterogeneous membrane. The unprotected areas were crosslinked to enhance the membrane stability, whereas the protected areas retained their original permeability. Three types of hydrophilic base membranes were selected and prepared from poly(2,6‐dimethyl‐1,4‐phenylene oxide) and poly(vinyl alcohol). The base membranes were partially crosslinked (5.56% of the direct area with enlarged areas) to investigate their stability and diffusion dialysis (DD) performances. The partially crosslinked membranes had remarkably reduced water uptake and swelling degrees compared with the base membranes (72.4–250.4 vs 178.2%–544.4% and 94.0%–408.0% vs. 163.8%–814.8%). Meanwhile, the membranes still retained high DD performances for separating HCl–FeCl₂ or NaOH–NaAlO₂ solutions. The dialysis coefficients of HCl and NaOH were much higher than those of the fully crosslinked membranes (0.0209 vs. 0.0109 m/h and 0.0059–0.0085 vs. 0.0017–0.0022 m/h). Hence, partial crosslinking was effective in optimizing the membrane hydrophilicity and permeability. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2017 , 134, 45305.     

Dehydration of light oil by pervaporation using poly(vinyl alcohol)–poly(acrylic acid‐co‐maleic acid) membranes

A new blended membrane was prepared and tested by pervaporation of light oil, a mixture of five alcohols plus water. The blended membrane was synthesized by blending poly(vinyl alcohol) and poly(acrylic acid‐co‐maleic acid) sodium salt in the presence of sulfuric acid to dope the reaction. We tested several membranes in order to choose the adequate composition to have the best permselectivity. The PVA(60)–PAA‐co‐maleic acid(40) membrane was selected as it was found to be highly selective. Sorption experiments were performed using binary and ternary water–alcohol solutions. The influence of temperature and feed composition on the selectivity and flux in pervaporation was investigated for two different binary mixtures (water/ethanol, water/isobutanol) and one ternary system (water/ethanol/isobutanol). This membrane presents good permselective properties, high water flux, and good selectivity and can even be used for high‐water activities The performances of this new membrane were compared to those obtained with the PVA(90)–PAA(10) membrane synthesized recently: The fluxes observed for the water–ethanol separation were of the same order of magnitude but the selectivity was found to be much higher. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 86: 1709–1716, 2002     

Phase structure in the blend of atactic poly(vinyl alcohol) with atactic poly(vinyl alcohol‐block‐vinyl acetate)

An almost fully saponified atactic poly(vinyl alcohol) and an atactic poly(vinyl alcohol‐block‐vinyl acetate) of which degree of saponification is 89 mol % were blended by a solution casting method. The phase structure of the blend film was analyzed by optical microscopy, ¹³C‐NMR, and differential scanning calorimetry. The most remarkable structure of the blend was composed of cylindrical domains penetrating the film. The swelling behavior of the blend films was also investigated in the dimethylsulfoxide and water mixed solvents to find differences in solubility and diffusion behavior between the matrix and the domain. The cylindrical domains could be selectively dissolved away in water and the film became porous. We tried to change the size of the cylindrical domain with various film preparation conditions. This aimed to turn the film into the useful filter membrane. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 86: 1807–1815, 2002     

Synthesis and characterization of novel oligomeric poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile)–clay complexes

Oligomeric poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) quaternary ammonium salts were prepared through reactions of trimethylamine with corresponding poly(styrene–acrylonitrile–vinyl benzyl chloride)s, which were synthesized by the free‐radical polymerization of a mixture of styrene, acrylonitrile, and vinyl benzyl chloride. Then, oligomeric poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile)‐modified clays were prepared through the cation exchange of the sodium ions in the clay with the corresponding poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) quaternary ammonium salts. The poly(styrene–acrylonitrile–vinyl benzyl chloride)s, poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) quaternary ammonium salts, and their clay complexes were characterized with infrared spectroscopy, gel permeation chromatography, thermogravimetric analysis, proton nuclear magnetic resonance, X‐ray diffraction, and transmission electron microscopy. X‐ray diffraction and transmission electron microscopy studies showed that these novel clay complexes were well intercalated. Furthermore, thermogravimetric analysis data indicated that this series of polymerically modified clays had high enough thermal stability for nanocomposites by melt blending. The thermal treatment of one of these novel clays at 250°C under nitrogen was also conducted. Solubility and infrared studies of this thermally treated clay complex revealed that a novel polyimine/enamine structure clay complex had been formed in the gallery of the clay. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2009     

Solution and solid‐state blend compatibility of poly(vinyl alcohol) and poly(methyl methacrylate)

The blend miscibility of poly(vinyl alcohol) and poly(methyl methacrylate) in N,N′‐dimethylformamide solution was investigated by viscosity, density, ultrasonic velocity, refractive index, and UV and fluorescence spectra studies. Differential scanning calorimetry and scanning electron microscopy were used to confirm the blend miscibility in the solid state. Blends were compatible when the concentration of poly(vinyl alcohol) was greater than 60 wt %. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 100: 2415–2421, 2006     

Transport of cadmium and iron through a carboxylic membrane based on a poly(vinyl chloride)/poly(methyl methacrylate‐co‐divinyl benzene) system

The transport of cadmium and iron through a poly(vinyl chloride)/poly(methyl methacrylate‐co‐divinyl benzene) carboxylic ion‐exchange membrane was investigated with a system containing HCl as the receiver solution and CdCl₂ or FeCl₃ as the feed solution. Transport of the ions through the membrane depended on the H⁺ concentration in the receiver solution and the metal concentration in the feed solution. The rate of transfer for cadmium was about 35% higher than that for iron under the same conditions (0.5 mol/dm³ of HCl, 0.1 mol/dm³ of CdCl₂ or FeCl₃, and 5 h of dialysis). © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 95: 705–707, 2005     

Properties of modified poly(vinyl alcohol) membranes prepared by the grafting of new polyelectrolyte copolymers for water–ethanol mixture separation

For the preparation of a water‐selective membrane for the pervaporation separation of an azeotropic solution, a series of grafted copolymers were synthesized by the reaction of poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) with poly(sodium salt styrene sulfonic acid‐co‐maleic acid) (PSStSA‐co‐MA). The esterification was performed between the hydroxyl groups of PVA and the carboxylic groups of the copolymer with a heat treatment. PSStSA‐co‐MA was prepared with sodium salt styrene sulfonic acid and maleic anhydride copolymerization in dimethyl sulfoxide with azobisisobutyronitrile as an initiator. The reaction mechanism and resultant structure were confirmed with IR spectra. The effect of the heat‐treatment time on the gel content was investigated. The permeation flux decreased and the separation factor increased as the crosslinking agent content rose. A membrane containing 15 wt % PSStSA‐co‐MA was used for water–ethanol azeotropic solution pervaporation at 30°C, and a flux of 0.43 kg/m² h and a separation factor of 190 were obtained. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 86: 2854–2859, 2002     

Synthesis and characterization of poly(2‐ethylaniline)–poly(styrenesulfonic acid) and poly(o‐phenetidine)–poly(styrenesulfonic acid) complexes

This research focuses on the synthesis of ethyl and ethoxy substituted polyaniline with poly(styrenesulfonic acid) comprising a poly(o‐phenetidine)–poly(styrenesulfonic acid) [P(O? P)‐PSSA] and poly(2‐ethylaniline)–poly(styrenesulfonic acid) [P(2‐E)‐PSSA]. The complexes P(O? P)‐PSSA and P(2‐E)‐PSSA were prepared by chemical polymerization of monomer (o‐phenetidine, 2‐ethylaniline) with PSSA using an oxidant of ammonium persulfate in 1M HCl solution; polyaniline (PANI), poly(2‐ethylaniline) (P2E), poly(o‐pheneditine) (POP), and polyaniline‐poly(styrenesulfonic acid) (PANI‐PSSA) also were prepared by chemical polymerization to be the reference samples. The products were characterized by IR, VIS, EPR, water solubility, elemental analysis, conductivity, SEM, and TEM. IR spectral studies shown that the structure of P(2‐E)‐PSSA and P(O? P)‐PSSA complexes is similar to that of polyaniline. EPR and visible spectra indicate the formation of polarons. The morphology of the blend was investigated by measured SEM and TEM, indicating the conducting component and electrically conductive property of the polymer complexes. The pH value for deprotonation [pH ≥ 9.5 for P(2‐E)‐PSSA and pH ≥ 8.0 for P(O? P)‐PSSA] are higher than that of corresponding HCl salts, indicating an intimate interaction between polymer chains. Elemental analysis results show that P(O? P)‐PSSA has a nitrogen‐to‐sulfur ratio of ～52%, larger than that for P(2‐E)‐PSSA, ～41%. The conductivity of the complexes is around 10^?2S/cm, and the solubility of P(2‐E)‐PSSA and P(O? P)‐PSSA in water is 2.9 and 1.9 g/L, respectively. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 98: 1198–1205, 2005     

Synthesis and characterization of poly(dimethylamino ethyl methacrylate)–poly(ethylene oxide)–poly(dimethylamino ethyl methacrylate) triblock copolymers

Novel, monodispersed, and well‐defined ABA triblock copolymers [poly(dimethylamino ethyl methacrylate)–poly(ethylene oxide)–poly(dimethylamino ethyl methacrylate)] were synthesized by oxyanionic polymerization with potassium tert‐butanoxide as the initiator. Gel permeation chromatography and ¹H‐NMR analysis showed that the obtained products were the desired copolymers with molecular weights close to calculated values. Because the poly(dimethylamino ethyl methacrylate) block was pH‐ and temperature‐sensitive, the aqueous solution behavior of the polymers was investigated with ¹H‐NMR and dynamic light scattering techniques at different pH values and at different temperatures. The micelle morphology was determined with transmission electron microscopy. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2009     

Production of polymeric membranes made of polypropylene,poly(ethylene‐co‐vinyl acetate), and poly(vinyl alcohol)

In this study, we prepared and characterized membranes containing polypropylene, poly(ethylene‐co‐vinyl acetate) (EVA), and poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA). The production process involved blend extrusion and calendering followed by solvent extraction by toluene and water of the EVA and PVA phases. Morphology studies involving scanning electron microscopy determined the pore size distribution at the surface and in the internal regions of the membrane. The resulting membrane properties were related to the processing variables (extension rate, process temperature, and solvent extraction methods) and blend composition. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 92: 3275–3286, 2004     

Transient currents in poly(vinyl alcohol)–poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) polymer blend films

Transient currents (charging and discharging currents) in poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA)–poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) (PVP) polymer blend films were measured over the temperature range 30–150°C at field strengths of 2.32–23.2 × 10⁶ Vm^?1. Polymer films were prepared by the isothermal immersion technique. Activation energies were evaluated from quasi-steady-state currents. A single relaxation peak was observed both from isochronal currents and low frequency dielectric relaxation. Activation energies evaluated from these two methods are found to be in fairly good agreement. The polarization is considered to be due to space charge origin along with some contribution from dipolar groups. The maximum loss was observed in Sample I (PVA: PVP = 25:75), suggesting maximum heterogeneity in this blend ratio.     

One‐pot synthesized poly(vinyl pyrrolidone‐co‐methyl methacrylate‐co‐acrylic acid) blended with poly(ether sulfone) to prepare blood‐compatible membranes

In this study, a random copolymer of poly(vinyl pyrrolidone‐co‐methyl methacrylate‐co‐acrylic acid) was synthesized via a one‐pot reaction with the reversible addition–fragmentation chain‐transfer method and was then blended with poly(ether sulfone) (PES) to prepare flat‐sheet membranes that were expected to have anticoagulant and antifouling properties. The synthesized copolymer was characterized by Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) and NMR spectroscopy. The molecular weights and molecular weight distributions were determined by gel permeation chromatography. Elemental analysis was used to calculate the molar ratios of vinyl pyrrolidone (VP), methyl methacrylate (MMA), and acrylic acid (AA) in the copolymer. A liquid–liquid phase‐inversion technique was used to prepare the copolymer‐blended PES membranes. X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy and attenuated total reflectance–FTIR spectroscopy were used to investigate the copolymer on the membrane surfaces. Compared with the pristine PES membrane, the modified PES membranes showed improved hydrophilicity, low hemolysis ratios, decreased protein adsorption, and suppressed platelet adhesion. Furthermore, the thrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time indicated that the blood compatibility of the modified PES membranes were improved. The results of the 3‐(4,5‐Dimethylthiazol‐2‐yl)‐2,5‐diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay and the cell morphology suggested that the cytocompatibility increased. In addition, the modified membranes showed good protein antifouling properties. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 130: 4284–4298, 2013     

Hydrogen‐bonding interaction of an alternating maleic acid–vinyl acetate copolymer with poly(ethylene glycol), polyacrylamide and poly(N‐isopropylacrylamide): a comparative study

The hydrogen‐bonding interaction and interpolymer complex formation between an alternating maleic acid–vinyl acetate copolymer, (MAc‐alt‐VA) and poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG), polyacrylamide (PAM) or poly(N‐isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAM) in aqueous solution was potentiometrically and viscometrically investigated. MAc‐alt‐VA formed with PEG a strong hydrogen‐bonding interpolymer complex with a compact structure, and while its interaction with PAM seems to be very weak, if any, the complex formed with PNIPAM is even stronger than that with PEG. This indicates a very important contribution of hydrophobic interaction to the formation of such hydrogen‐bonding interpolymer complexes. Copyright © 2003 Society of Chemical Industry