Preparation and characterization of syndiotactic polystyrene/ethylene‐propylene copolymer blends

The reactive compatibilization of syndiotactic polystyrene (sPS)/oxazoline‐styrene copolymer (RPS)/maleic anhydride grafted ethylene‐propylene copolymer (EPR‐MA) blends is investigated in this study. First, the miscibility of sPS/RPS blends is examined by thermal analysis. The cold crystallization peak (T_cc) moved toward higher temperature with increased PRS, and, concerning enthalpy relaxation behaviors, only a single enthalpy relation peak was found in all aged samples. These results indicate that the sPS/RPS blend is miscible along the various compositions and RPS can be used in the reactive compatibilization of sPS/RPS/EPR‐MA blends. The reactive compatibilized sPS/RPS/EPR‐MA blends showed finer morphology than sPS/EPR‐MA physical blends and higher storage modulus (G') and complex viscosity (η*) when RPS contents were increased. Moreover, the impact strength of sPS/RPS/EPR‐MA increased significantly compared to sPS/EPR‐MA blend, and SEM micrographs after impact testing show that the sPS/RPS/EPR‐MA blend has better adhesion between the sPS matrix and the dispersed EPR‐MA phase. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 85: 2084–2091, 2002     

Effect of crystalline microstructure near the particle/matrix interface on the toughening of syndiotactic polystyrene/polyamide‐6 blends

Toughening behavior of semicrystalline polymers was investigated using syndiotactic polystyrene (sPS)/polyamide 6(PA‐6) blends compatibilized with maleic‐anhydride functionalized poly (styrene‐b‐(ethylene‐co‐butylene)‐b‐styrene) SEBS‐MA triblock copolymer. The effect of interparticle distance and crystal microstructure near the particle/matrix interface of the blends were studied. The morphology studies revealed that the size and interparticle distance of the dispersed PA‐6 particles decreased with increasing SEBS‐MA concentration. sPS/PA‐6 blends exhibited sharp brittle‐ductile transitions at a critical interparticle distance of 0.25 μm. With the increase of the compatibilizer concentration beyond a certain level, it was observed that the further addition resulted in decreased impact strength. This could be attributed to the formation of a separate phase in the matrix by the additional SEBS added. The TEM studies showed that when the interparticle distance is below 0.25 μm, the matrix ligaments between the inclusions will be filled with well‐oriented crystalline material of reduced plastic resistance. From DSC and X‐ray diffraction studies of model thin films, it was found that the fraction of small and imperfect crystallites near the particle/matrix interface increased with decreasing interparticle distance. This resulted in decreased yield stress of the whole matrix with increasing concentration of SEBS‐MA accompanied by changes in the fracture mode from brittle to tough. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Grafted syndiotactic polystyrene synthesized via melting graft copolymerization used as a compatibilizer for immiscible syndiotactic polystyrene/polyadimide 66 blends

A new grafted syndiotactic polystyrene (g‐sPS), to be used as a compatibilizer for syndiotactic polystyrene (sPS)/polyadimide 66 blends, was prepared by the melting graft copolymerization of sPS and monomers composed of itaconic acid and dibutyl maleate with dicumyl peroxide as an initiator. The resulting g‐sPS possessed a side‐chain structure identified by IR spectra, and the results of mechanical testing show that a good impact strength and tensile strength were obtained for g‐sPS at a 7.16‐phr addition of monomer with a 3:1 proportion of dibutyl maleate and itaconic acid. Differential scanning calorimetry and scanning electron microscopy analysis indicated that the g‐sPS maintained a high glass‐transition temperature and a crystalline structure. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 97: 1659–1666, 2005     

Synthesis and properties of reactively compatibilized polyester and polyamide blends

The functionalization of poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT) has been accomplished in a twin screw extruder by grafting maleic anhydride (MA) using a free radical polymerization technique. The resulting PBT‐g‐MA was successfully used as a compatibilizer for the binary blends of polyester (PBT) and polyamide (PA66). Enhanced mechanical properties were achieved for the blend containing a small amount (as low as 2.5 %) of PBT‐g‐MA compared to the binary blend of unmodified PBT with PA66. Loss and storage moduli for blends containing compatibilizer were higher than those of uncompatibilized blends or their respective polymers. The grafting and compatibilization reactions were confirmed using FTIR and ¹³C NMR spectroscopy. The properties of these blends were studied in detail by varying the amount of compatibilizer, and the improved mechanical behaviour was correlated with the morphology with the help of scanning electron microscopy. Morphology studies also revealed the interfacial interaction in the blend containing grafted PBT. The improvement in the properties of these blends can be attributed to the effective interaction of grafted maleic anhydride groups with the amino group in PA66. The results indicate that PBT‐g‐MA acts as an effective compatibilizer for the immiscible blends of PBT and PA66. © 2000 Society of Chemical Industry     

Effect of syndiotactic polystyrene on the crystallization behavior of isotactic polypropylene/syndiotactic polystyrene blends with and without β‐nucleating agent

Blends of isotactic polypropylene (PP) and syndiotactic polystyrene (sPS) with and without β‐nucleating agent were prepared using a twin‐screw extruder at 290 °C. Blends of PP/sPS with β‐nucleating agent mainly show β crystalline form, irrespective of high (20 °C min^?1) or low (2 °C min^?1) previous cooling rates. This suggests that the cooling rates have little effect on the polymorphic composition of PP in PP/sPS blends. The effect of sPS on the crystallization of PP is compared with that of polyamide 6 (PA6). The increase in crystallization temperature of PP is smaller in the presence of sPS than in the presence of PA6; the fold surface free energy of PP/sPS is larger than that of PP/PA6 blends. These results reveal that compared with PA6, sPS has much weaker α‐nucleation effect on the crystallization of PP. The weak α‐nucleation effect of sPS is attributed to the high lattice mismatch between PP and sPS crystals.     

Preparation and characterization of maleic anhydride-functionalized syndiotactic polystyrene

The free radical-induced grafting of maleic anhydride (MA) onto syndiotactic polystyrene (sPS) has been accomplished in the solution process by using 1,1,2-trichloroethane as solvent and dicumyl peroxide as free radical initiator. The amount of MA grafted on sPS was evaluated by a titration method. Grafted products separated from the reaction mixture were purified and analyzed. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and ¹H NMR studies indicate that MA attaches to the sPS in the form of single succinic anhydride rings as well as short oligomers. The results obtained by GPC analysis suggest that the degradation and chain extension reaction do not occur under the reaction conditions. Moreover, the crystallization behavior of MA-functionalized sPS was also studied by means of differential scanning calorimetry. It was found that the crystallization behavior of the grafted polymer exhibited somewhat differences in comparison to the neat sPS. The MA-functionalized sPS crystallizes at higher rate than the unmodified polymer, on the other hand, the degree of crystallinity (X_c) are lowered by the presence of the MA grafts.     

Blends of polyamide1010 with unmodified and maleic‐anhydride‐grafted high‐impact polystyrene

The crystallization behaviors, dynamic mechanical properties, tensile, and morphology features of polyamide1010 (PA1010) blends with the high‐impact polystyrene (HIPS) were examined at a wide composition range. Both unmodified and maleic‐anhydride‐(MA)‐grafted HIPS (HIPS‐g‐MA) were used. It was found that the domain size of HIPS‐g‐MA was much smaller than that of HIPS at the same compositions in the blends. The mechanical performances of PA1010–HIPS‐g‐MA blends were enhanced much more than that of PA1010–HIPS blends. The crystallization temperature of PA1010 shifted towards higher temperature as HIPS‐g‐MA increased from 20 to 50% in the blends. For the blends with a dispersed PA phase (≤35 wt %), the T_c of PA1010 shifted towards lower temperature, from 178 to 83°C. An additional transition was detected at a temperature located between the T_g's of PA1010 and PS. It was associated with the interphase relaxation peak. Its intensity increased with increasing content of PA1010, and the maximum occurred at the composition of PA1010–HIPS‐g‐MA 80/20. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 74: 857–865, 1999     

Effect of core‐shell morphology evolution on the rheology,crystallization, and mechanical properties of PA6/EPDM‐g‐MA/HDPE ternary blend

In this article, polyamide 6 (PA6), maleic anhydride grafted ethylene‐propylene‐diene monomer (EPDM‐g‐MA), high‐density polyethylene (HDPE) were simultaneously added into an internal mixer to melt‐mixing for different periods. The relationship between morphology and rheological behaviors, crystallization, mechanical properties of PA6/EPDM‐g‐MA/HDPE blends were studied. The phase morphology observation revealed that PA6/EPDM‐g‐MA/HDPE (70/15/15 wt %) blend is constituted from PA6 matrix in which is dispersed core‐shell droplets of HDPE core encapsulated by EPDM‐g‐MA phase and indicated that the mixing time played a crucial role on the evolution of the core‐shell morphology. Rheological measurement manifested that the complex viscosity and storage modulus of ternary blends were notable higher than the pure polymer blends and binary blends which ascribed different phase morphology. Moreover, the maximum notched impact strength of PA6/EPDM‐g‐MA/HDPE blend was 80.7 KJ/m² and this value was 10–11 times higher than that of pure PA6. Particularly, differential scanning calorimetry results indicated that the bulk crystallization temperature of HDPE (114.6°C) was partly weakened and a new crystallization peak appeared at a lower temperature of around 102.2°C as a result of co‐crystal of HDPE and EPDM‐g‐MA. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2013     

A novel preparation method of maleic anhydride grafted syndiotactic polystyrene and its blend performance with nylon6

Summary This work is intended to provide a method for the preparation of maleic anhydride grafted syndiotactic polystyrene (sPS-g-MA). In particular, a novel solid reaction method by a radical grafting approach is investigated. The grafting reaction is performed at a solid state, where the syndiotactic polystyrene (sPS) is swollen in solvent at relatively low temperature compared to the conventional melt modification method. The formation of sPS-g-MA is directly confirmed by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and by the morphology observation of sPS/polyamide-6 (Nylon6) blends, when sPS-g-MA is used as a reactive compatibilizer. Received: 27 February 2002 / Revised version: 26 April 2002 / Accepted: 30 April 2002     

Preparation of the HIPS/MA graft copolymer and its compatibilization in HIPS/PA1010 blends

The graft copolymer of high‐impact polystyrene (HIPS) grafted with maleic anhydride (MA) (HIPS‐g‐MA) was prepared with melt mixing in the presence of a free‐radical initiator. The grafting reaction was confirmed by infrared analyses, and the amount of MA grafted on HIPS was evaluated by a titration method. 1–5% of MA can be grafted on HIPS. HIPS‐g‐MA is miscible with HIPS. Its anhydride group can react with polyamide 1010 (PA1010) during melt mixing of the two components. The compatibility of HIPS‐g‐MA in the HIPS/PA1010 blends was evident. Evidence of reactions in the blends was confirmed in the morphology and mechanical behavior of the blends. A significant reduction in domain size was observed because of the compatibilization of HIPS‐g‐MA in the blends of HIPS and PA1010. The tensile mechanical properties of the prepared blends were investigated, and the fracture surfaces of the blends were examined by means of the scanning electron microscope. The improved adhesion in a 15% HIPS/75% PA1010 blend with 10% HIPS‐g‐MA copolymer was detected. The morphology of fibrillar ligaments formed by PA1010 connecting HIPS particles was observed. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 71: 2017–2025, 1999     

Novel reactive compatibilization strategy on immiscible polypropylene and polystyrene blend

Polypropylene (PP) and polystyrene (PS) are immiscible and incompatible. Since both PP and PS components possess no reactive functional group, reactive compatibilization of a PP/PS blend is impossible unless certain reactive functional groups are imparted to either PP or PS. In this study we provide a simple approach to reactively compatibilize the nonreactive PP/PS blend system by physically functionalizing PP and PS with the addition of maleic anhydride grafted PP (PP‐g‐MA) and styrene maleic anhydride random copolymer (SMA), respectively. An epoxy monomer, serving as a coupler and possessing four epoxy groups able to react with the maleic anhydride of PP‐g‐MA and SMA, was then added during melt blending. Observations of the finer PS domain sizes and improved mechanical properties support the plausibility of reactive compatibilization of this nonreactive PP/PS blend by combining physically functionalized PP and PS with tetra‐glycidyl ether of diphenyl diamino methane (TGDDM) in a one‐step extrusion process. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 2008     

Nonisothermal crystallization and melting behavior of β‐nucleated isotactic polypropylene and polyamide 66 blends

A highly novel nano‐CaCO₃ supported β‐nucleating agent was employed to prepare β‐nucleated isotactic polypropylene (iPP) blend with polyamide (PA) 66, β‐nucleated iPP/PA66 blend, as well as its compatibilized version with maleic anhydride grafted PP (PP‐g‐MA), maleic anhydride grafted polyethylene‐octene (POE‐g‐MA), and polyethylene‐vinyl acetate (EVA‐g‐MA), respectively. Nonisothermal crystallization behavior and melting characteristics of β‐nucleated iPP and its blends were investigated by differential scanning calorimeter and wide angle X‐ray diffraction. Experimental results indicated that the crystallization temperature (T) of PP shifts to high temperature in the non‐nucleated PP/PA66 blends because of the α‐nucleating effect of PA66. T of PP and the β‐crystal content (K_β) in β‐nucleated iPP/PA66 blends not only depended on the PA66 content, but also on the compatibilizer type. Addition of PP‐g‐MA and POE‐g‐MA into β‐nucleated iPP/PA66 blends increased the β‐crystal content; however, EVA‐g‐MA is not benefit for the formation of β‐crystal in the compatibilized β‐nucleated iPP/PA66 blend. It can be relative to the different interfacial interactions between PP and compatibilizers. The nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of PP in the blends was evaluated by Mo's method. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011     

Miscibility, crystallization and morphologies of syndiotactic polystyrene blends with isotactic polystyrene and with atactic polystyrene

Two-component blends of differing polystyrene (PS), one syndiotactic (sPS) and the other isotactic (iPS) or atactic (aPS), were discussed. The phase behavior, crystallization and microstructure of binary polystyrene blends of sPS/iPS and sPS/aPS with a specific composition of 5/5 weight ratio were investigated using optical microscopy (OM), differential scanning calorimetry, wide-angle X-ray diffraction, scanning and transmission electron microscopy (SEM and TEM). Based on the kinetics of enthalpy recovery, complete miscibility was found for the sPS/aPS blends where a single recovery peak was obtained, whereas phase separation was concluded for the sPS/iPS blends due to the presence of an additional recovery shoulder indicating the heterogeneity in the molten state. These findings were consistent with OM and SEM observations; sPS/iPS exhibits the dual interconnectivity of phase-separated phases resulting from spinodal decomposition.Both iPS and aPS have the same influence on the sPS crystal structure, i.e., dominant β-form sPS and mixed α-/β-form sPS obtained for melt-crystallization at high and low temperatures respectively, but imperfect α-form sPS developed when cold-crystallized at 175 °C. Co-crystallization of iPS and sPS into the common lattice was not observed regardless the thermal treatments, either cold or melt crystallization. Due to its slow process, crystallization of iPS was found to commence always after the completion of sPS crystallization in one-step crystallization kinetics. Segregation of rejected iPS component during sPS crystallization was extensively observed from TEM and SEM images which showed iPS pockets located between sPS lamellar stacks within spherulites, leading to the interfibrillar segregation, which was similar with that observed in the sPS/aPS blends. The addition of iPS (or aPS) component will reduce the overall crystallization rate of the sPS component and the retardation of crystal growth rates can be simply accounted by a dilution effect, keeping the surface nucleation intact. The phase-separated structure in the sPS/iPS blend shows a negligible effect on sPS crystallization and the signature of phase separation disappears after sPS crystallization. Depending on the relative dimensions of the segregated domains and iPS lamellar nucleus, subsequent crystallization of iPS can proceed to result in a crystalline/crystalline blend, or be inhibited to give a crystalline/amorphous blend morphology similar with that of sPS/aPS blends.     

Effect of compatibilization on the properties of HIPS/PA1010 blends

Blends consisting of high‐impact polystyrene (HIPS) as the matrix and polyamide 1010 (PA1010) as the dispersed phase were prepared by mixing. The grafting copolymers of HIPS and maleic anhydride (MA), the compatibilizer precursors of the blends, were synthesized. The contents of the MA in the grafting copolymers are 4.7 wt % and 1.6 wt %, and were assigned as HAM and LMA, respectively. Different blend morphologies were observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM); the domain size of the PA1010 dispersed phase in the HIPS matrix of compatibilized blends decreased comparing with that of uncompatibilized blends. For the blend with 25 wt % HIPS‐g‐MA component, the T_c of PA1010 shifts towards lower temperature, from 178 to 83°C. It is found that HIPS‐g‐MA used as the third component has profound effect on the mechanical properties of the resulting blends. This behavior has been attributed to the chemical reaction taking place in situ during the mixing between the two components of PA1010 and HIPS‐g‐MA. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 76: 799–806, 2000     

Compatibilization and morphology development of immiscible ternary polymer blends

We report a novel and effective strategy that compatibilizes three immiscible polymers, polyolefins, styrene polymers, and engineering plastics, achieved by using a polyolefin-based multi-phase compatibilizer. Compatibilizing effect and morphology development are investigated in a model ternary immiscible polymer blends consisting of polypropylene (PP)/polystyrene(PS)/polyamide(PA6) and a multi-phase compatibilizer (PP-g-(MAH-co-St) as prepared by maleic anhydride (MAH) and styrene (St) dual monomers melt grafting PP. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) results indicate that, as a multi-phase compatibilizer, PP-g-(MAH-co-St) shows effective compatibilization in the PP/PS/PA6 blends. The particle size of both PS and PA6 is greatly decreased due to the addition of multi-phase compatibilizer, while the interfacial adhesion in immiscible pairs is increased. This good compatibilizing effect is promising for developing a new, technologically attractive method for achieving compatibilization of immiscible multi-component polymer blends as well as for recycling and reusing of such blends. For phase morphology development, the morphology of PP/PS/PA6 (70/15/15) uncompatibilized blend reveals that the blend is constituted from PP matrix in which are dispersed composite droplets of PA6 core encapsulated by PS phase. Whereas, the compatibilized blend shows the three components strongly interact with each other, i.e. multi-phase compatibilizer has good compatibilization between the various immiscible pairs. For the 40/30/30 blend, the morphology changed from a three-phase co-continuous morphology (uncompatibilized) to the dispersed droplets of PA6 and PS in the PP matrix (compatibilized).     

Syndiotactic polystyrene‐b‐atactic polypropylene block copolymer alloy as a compatibilizer for syndiotactic polystyrene/isotactic polypropylene blends

A polymeric alloy (SP–A) containing syndiotactic polystyrene (sPS), atactic polypropylene (aPP), and about 66 wt % sPS‐b‐aPP diblock copolymer, was prepared by the sequential feed of monomers in the presence of the half‐titanocene Cp*Ti(OBz)₃ (where Cp* is C₅Me₅ and Bz is PhCH₂), modified methylaluminoxane, and external triisobutylaluminum. The effects of the SP–A alloy as a compatibilizer for sPS and isotactic polypropylene (iPP) blends were evaluated. The blending of sPS and iPP, with and without SP–A, was performed in a single‐screw miniextruder with a side channel that allowed the continuous recycling of materials. The influence of SP–A on the mechanical and thermal properties of the immiscible sPS/iPP blends was investigated over a range of composition. The presence of the SP–A alloy resulted in a significant improvement of the impact strength of the blends compared with that of pure sPS and their pure blends. This improvement was particularly obvious in the sPS/iPP (90/10 wt %) blend containing 5 wt % SP–A. Morphological analysis of the impact‐fractured surface of the ternary blends indicated that the sPS‐b‐aPP diblock copolymer contained in the SP–A alloy acted as an efficient compatibilizer by decreasing the dispersed‐phase iPP particle size, improving the interfacial adhesion, and generating a stable microphase‐separated state. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 89: 1596–1605, 2003     

Blends of recycled polycarbonate and acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene: comparing the effect of reactive compatibilizers on mechanical and morphological properties

Blends of recycled polycarbonate (PC) and acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene (ABS) were prepared and some mechanical and morphological properties were investigated. To compatibilize these blends, ABS‐g‐(maleic anhydride) (ABS‐g‐MA) and (ethylene–vinyl acetate)‐g‐(maleic anhydride) (EVA‐g‐MA) with similar degree of grafting of 1.5% were used. To compare the effect of the type of compatibilizer on mechanical properties, blends were prepared using 3, 5 and 10 phr of each compatibilizer. A co‐rotating twin‐screw extruder was used for blending. The results showed that ABS‐g‐MA had no significant effect on the tensile strength of the blends while EVA‐g‐MA decreased the tensile strength, the maximum decrease being about 9.6% when using 10 phr of this compatibilizer. The results of notched Charpy impact strength tests showed that EVA‐g‐MA increased the impact strength of blends more than ABS‐g‐MA. The maximum value of this increase occurred when using 5 phr of each compatibilizer, it being about 54% for ABS‐g‐MA and 165% for EVA‐g‐MA. Scanning electron microscopy micrographs showed that the particle size of the dispersed phase was decreased in the continuous phase of PC by using the compatibilizers. Moreover, a blend without compatibilizer showed brittle behaviour while the blends containing compatibilizer showed ductile behaviour in fracture. © 2013 Society of Chemical Industry     

Heterogeneous polyamide 66/syndiotactic polystyrene blends: Phase structure and thermal and mechanical properties

The structural and physical properties of polyamide 66 (PA66)/syndiotactic polystyrene (sPS) blends were studied with electron microscopy, wide‐angle X‐ray scattering (WAXS), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), dynamic mechanical thermal analysis, and tensile creep, stress–strain, and impact measurements. Attention was primarily concentrated on blends with sPS weight fractions (w₂) in the range of 0 < w₂ ≤ 0.50. DSC and WAXS showed that the integral crystallinity of the PA66 and sPS components in the blends was virtually unaffected by the blend composition. Polymorphism of sPS was observed for blends with w₂ ≥ 0.50. Blends with 0.40 ≤ w₂ ≤ 0.60 consisted of partially cocontinuous components; otherwise, particles of the minority component were dispersed in the continuous majority component. The compatibilizer enhanced interfacial adhesion so that no debonding of the components in the fractured blends was observed. The compliance and creep rate of the blends at room temperature decreased proportionally to the sPS fraction; a corresponding increase in the storage modulus (E′) was observed in the 25–100°C interval. However, E′ (125°C) noticeably declined with w₂ and thus showed that sPS did not improve the dimensional stability of the blends at elevated temperatures. The yield strength consistently grew with w₂, whereas the yield strain dropped markedly; blends with w₂ ≥ 0.60 were brittle, showing very low values of the ultimate properties. The stress at break, strain at break, and tensile energy to break displayed some local maxima at 0.25 ≤ w₂ ≤ 0.30, whereas the tensile impact strength steeply decreased. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 96: 673–684, 2005     

Miscibility, thermal properties and polymorphism of syndiotactic polystyrene/poly(styrene-co-α-methyl styrene) blends

This work examined the miscibility, crystallization kinetics, melting behavior and crystal structure of syndiotactic polystyrene (sPS)/poly(styrene-co-α-methyl styrene) blends. Differential scanning calorimetry, polarized light microscopy and wide angle X-ray diffraction technique were used to approach the goals. The single composition-dependent T_gs of the blends and the melting temperature (T_m) depression of sPS in the blends indicated the miscible characteristic of the blend system at all compositions. Furthermore, the T_gs of the blends could be predicted by either of the Gordon–Taylor equation (with K=0.99) or the Fox equation with a slightly higher deviation. The dynamic and isothermal crystallization abilities of sPS were hindered with the incorporation of the miscible copolymer. Complex melting behavior was observed for melt-crystallized pure sPS and its blends as well. Nevertheless, the blends showed relatively simpler melting curves. Comparing with melt-crystallized samples, the cold-crystallized samples exhibited simpler melting behavior. The equilibrium melting temperature (T_m⁰) of β form sPS crystal determined from the conventional extrapolative method is 295.2 °C. The Flory–Huggins interaction parameter, χ, of the blends was estimated to be −0.27. The crystal morphology of sPS was disturbed in the blends. Only underdeveloped granular-like crystalline superstructure of sPS exhibited in cold-crystallized blends. Moreover, the existence of the copolymer in the blends apparently reduced the possibility of forming the less stable α form sPS crystals.     

Co-continuous and encapsulated three phase morphologies in uncompatibilized and reactively compatibilized polyamide 6/polypropylene/polystyrene ternary blends using two reactive precursors

Phase morphology development in ternary uncompatibilized and reactively compatibilized blends based on polyamide 6 (PA6), polypropylene (PP) and polystyrene (PS) has been investigated. Reactive compatibilization of the blends has been performed using two reactive precursors; maleic anhydride grafted polypropylene (PP-g-MA) and styrene maleic anhydride copolymer (SMA) for PA6/PP and PA6/PS pairs, respectively. For comparison purposes, uncompatibilized and reactively compatibilized PA6/PP and PA6/PS binary blends, were first investigated. All the blends were melt-blended using a co-rotating twin-screw extruder. The phase morphology investigated using scanning electron microscope (SEM) and selective solvent extraction tests revealed that PA6/PP/PS blends having a weight percent composition of 70/15/15 is constituted from polyamide 6 matrix in which are dispersed composite droplets of PP core encapsulated by PS phase. Whereas, a co-continuous three-phase morphology was formed in the blends having a composition of 40/30/30. This morphology has been significantly affected by the reactive compatibilization. In the compatibilized PA6/(PP/PP–MA)/(PS/SMA) blends, PA6 phase was no more continuous but gets finely dispersed in the PS continuous phase. The DSC measurements confirmed the dispersed character of the PA6 phase. Indeed, in the compatibilized PA6/(PP/PP–MA)/(PS/SMA) blends where the PA6 particle size was smaller than 1 μm, the bulk crystallization temperature of PA6 (188 °C) was completely suppressed and a new crystallization peak emerges at a lower temperature of 93 °C as a result of homogeneous nucleation of PA6.