Extracellular Volume Changes and Blood Pressure Levels in Hemodialysis Patients

Background: Despite the use of highly efficient antihypertensive drugs (AHD), blood pressure (BP) is poorly controlled in the vast majority of hemodialysis (HD) patients. Many of them show no reduction in nocturnal BP, a finding that is associated with left ventricular hypertrophy. The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of the removal of a fluid overload on BP by monitoring the ambulatory BP during 48 hours in 16 hypertensive HD patients treated with AHD. Our aim was to obtain a gradual reduction in post‐HD body weight (BW) over a period of 3 to 4 months. Methods: During a period of 3–4 months, the postdialysis BW was reduced as the minimal tolerable BW was gradually achieved by slightly increasing the ultrafiltration volume. The Na concentration in the dialysate was reduced from 143–141 mmol/L to 139–138 mmol/L. Extracellular volume (ECV) was measured with a multiple‐frequency bioimpedance analyzer (Xitron 4000B, Xitron Technologies Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Based on the change in ECV, the patients were subdivided into two groups: group 1 with a reduction in ECV (n = 10), and group 2 with no reduction (n = 6). At the start of the study, BW, BP, and AHD in group 1 and group 2 were virtually identical. Results: Group 1 showed a significant reduction during the entire 48‐hour period in systolic (156 ± 16 mmHg vs. 140 ± 14 mmHg, P = 0.030) and diastolic BP (97 ± 12 mmHg vs. 87 ± 9 mmHg, P = 0.026) as well as in mean arterial pressure (MAP, 117 ± 13 vs. 105 ± 10 mmHg, P = 0.027). This reduction was more marked during the night (systolic BP 156 ± 15 mmHg vs. 138 ± 14 mmHg, P = 0.007; diastolic BP 97 ± 12 mmHg vs. 85 ± 9 mmHg, P = 0.009) than during the day (157 ± 18 mmHg vs. 142 ± 15 mmHg, P = 0.067; diastolic BP 97 ± 13 mmHg vs. 90 ± 9 mmHg, P = 0.126). A significant reduction in systolic load also occurred during the entire 48‐hour period (76 ± 24% vs. 46 ± 28%, P = 0.043) as well as in night systolic load (75 ± 21% vs. 41 ± 30%, P = 0.015) and night diastolic load (67 ± 32% vs. 39 ± 31%, P = 0.030). AHD were stopped in eight and reduced in two patients. There were no significant reductions in BP and AHD in group 2. Conclusions: The removal of excess fluid is necessary for adequate BP control and especially for the reduction in elevated BP during the night.     

Effects of end‐stage renal disease and dialysis modalities on blood ammonia level

Introduction: Uremia results in a characteristic breath odor (uremic fetor) which is largely due to its high ammonia content. Earlier studies have shown a strong correlation between breath ammonia and blood urea levels and a 10‐fold reduction in breath ammonia after hemodialysis in patients with chronic kidney disease. Potential sources of breath ammonia include: (i) local ammonia production from hydrolysis of urea in the oropharyngeal and respiratory tracts by bacterial flora, and (ii) release of circulating blood ammonia by the lungs. While the effects of uremia and hemodialysis on breath ammonia are well known their effects on blood ammonia are unknown and were explored here. Methods: Blood samples were obtained from 23 hemodialysis patients (immediately before and after dialysis), 14 peritoneal dialysis patients, and 10 healthy controls. Blood levels of ammonia, creatinine, urea, and electrolytes were measured. Findings: No significant difference was found in baseline blood ammonia between hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis and control groups. Hemodialysis procedure led to a significant reduction in urea concentration (P < 0.001) which was paradoxically accompanied by a modest but significant (P < 0.05) rise in blood ammonia level in 10 of the 23 patients studied. Change in blood ammonia pre‐ and post‐hemodialysis correlated with change in serum bicarbonate levels (r = 0.61, P < 0.01). On subgroup analysis of patients who had a rise in blood ammonia levels after dialysis, there was a strong correlation with drop in mean arterial pressure (r = 0.88, P < 0.01). The nadir intradialytic systolic blood pressure trended lower in the hemodialysis patients who had a rise in blood ammonia compared to the patients who manifested a fall in blood ammonia (124 ± 8 vs. 136 ± 6 mmHg respectively, P = 0.27). Discussion: Fall in blood urea following hemodialysis in ESRD patients was paradoxically accompanied by a modest rise in blood ammonia levels in 43% of the patients studied, contrasting prior reported effects of hemodialysis on breath ammonia. In this subgroup of patients, changes in blood ammonia during hemodialysis correlated with rise in blood bicarbonate and fall in mean arterial blood pressure.     

Acute complicating symptoms during hemodialysis sessions have well correlation with deranged blood pressure regulation

Objective: This observational study was undertaken to evaluate the frequency of acute complications occurring during dialysis sessions and their association with other clinical and biochemical parameters. Method: Forty‐six maintenance hemodialysis patients were selected and evaluated. Mean of the weekly evaluations of different parameters over a three‐month period is presented here. Result: Age of study subjects was 39 ± 13 years and body mass index (BMI) 21 ± 4 kg/m². Duration of hemodialysis was 41 ± 29 months. Most of the patients were hypertensive (98%), taking multiple anti‐hypertensive drugs. Mean of the blood pressures before and at the end of dialysis sessions over the three month period were: systolic blood pressure (SBP) 159 ± 18 vs. 163 ± 22 (p < 0.05) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) 92 ± 13 vs. 87 ± 7 mmHg (p < 0.003). Frequency of acute complicating symptoms during dialysis sessions were: headache (75%), rise in blood pressure (73%), leg cramps (67%), vomiting (60%), palpitation (58%), sweating (52%), and hypotension (35%). Raised blood pressure showed a positive correlation with headache (r = 0.50, p < 0.01) and sweating (r = 0.53, p < 0.05). Vomiting and palpitation were more frequent at low post‐dialysis blood pressure (vomiting vs. post‐SBP‐r = ?0.41, p < 0.05 and palpitation vs. post‐DBP‐r = ?0.48, p < 0.05), and these patients were likely to get inadequate dialysis (hypotension vs. Kt/V‐r = ?0.63, p < 0.01). Pre and post dialysis weight variation was 53 ± 11 vs. 51 ± 11 kg (p < 0.001), average ultrafiltration during dialysis (UF)?2.39 (0.5–4) liter and single session Kt/V was 0.95 ± 0.38. The rising tendency of post‐dialysis blood pressure correlated positively with increasing UF (SBP vs. UF‐r = 0.36, p < 0.01 and DBP vs. UF‐r = 0.25, p < 0.05). Conclusion: From this study it may be concluded that acute complications during dialysis sessions have a significant correlation with deranged blood pressure regulation, and optimum control of blood pressure could provide better dialysis.     

The Clinical Impact of Increasing the Hemodialysis Dose

Good evidence suggests that improvements in dialysis efficiency reduce morbidity and mortality of hemodialysis (HD) patients. Dialysis efficiency has also been related to better control of arterial blood pressure (BP), anemia, and serum phosphorus levels, and to improvement in patients' nutritional status. Over a 2‐year period, the present self‐controlled study of 34 HD patients (23 men, 11 women; age, 52.6 ± 14.5 years; HD duration, 55.9 ± 61.2 months) looked at the effect on clinical and laboratory parameters of increasing the delivered dialysis dose under a strict dry‐weight policy. Dialysis dose was increased without increasing dialysis time and frequency. A statistically significant increase was seen in delivered HD dose: the urea reduction ratio (URR) increased to 60% ± 10% from 52% ± 8%, and then to 71% ± 7% (p < 0.001); Kt/V_urea increased to 1.22 ± 0.28 from 0.93 ± 0.19, and then to 1.55 ± 0.29 (p < 0.001). A statistically significant increase in hemoglobin concentration also occurred—to 10.8 ± 1.9 g/dL from 10.4 ± 1.7 g/dL, and then to 11.0 ± 1.3 g/dL (p < 0.05 as compared to baseline)—with no significant difference in weekly erythropoietin dose. Statistically significant decreases occurred in the systolic and diastolic blood pressures during the first year; they then remained unchanged. Systolic blood pressure decreased to 131 ± 23 mmHg from 147 ± 24 mmHg (p < 0.001); diastolic blood pressure decreased to 65 ± 11 mmHg from 73 ± 12 mmHg (p < 0.001). Serum albumin increased insignificantly to 4.4 ± 0.4 g/dL from 4.3 ± 0.4 g/dL, and then significantly to 4.6 ± 0.3 g/dL (p = 0.002 as compared to both previous values). Normalized protein catabolic rate increased significantly to 1.16 ± 0.15 g/kg/day from 0.93 ± 0.16 g/kg/ day (p < 0.001), and then to 1.20 ± 0.17 g/kg/day (p < 0.001 as compared to baseline). We conclude that the increases achieved in average Kt/V_urea per hemodialysis session by increasing dialyzer membrane area, and blood and dialysate flows, without increasing dialysis time above 4 hours, in patients hemodialyzed thrice weekly, coupled with strict dry‐weight policy, resulted in improvements in hypertension, nutritional status, and anemia.     

Changes in biochemical,hemodynamic, and dialysis adherence parameters in hemodialysis patients during Ramadan

This paper aimed to study the effect of Ramadan fasting on biochemical and clinical parameters and compliance for dialysis. A prospective multicenter observational cross‐sectional study comparing fasting with a non‐fasting stable adult hemodialysis patients for demographic and biochemical parameters, compliance with dialysis, inter‐dialytic weight gain, pre‐ and post‐blood pressure, and frequency of intradialytic hypotensive episodes was carried out. Six hundred thirty‐five patients, of whom 64.1% fasted, were studied. The fasters were younger (53.3 ± 16.2 vs. 58.4 ± 16.1 years; P = 0.001) but had similar duration on dialysis (P = 0.35). More fasters worked (22.0% vs. 14.6%; P = 0.001) and missed dialysis sessions during Ramadan. No differences were noted between groups in sex, diabetic status, or dialysis shift or day. There were no differences in the pre‐ and post‐dialysis blood pressure; serum potassium, albumin or weight gain; diabetic status; sex; and dialysis shift time or days. However, serum phosphorous was significantly higher in the fasting group (2.78 ± 1.8 vs. 2.45 ± 1.6 mmol/L; P = 0.045). There were no intragroup differences in any of the parameters studied when comparing the findings during Ramadan with those in the month before Ramadan. Fasters were significantly younger and more likely to be working, to miss dialysis sessions, and to have higher serum phosphorous levels. No other differences were observed.     

Which fluid space is affected by ultrafiltration during hemodiafiltration?

Ultrafiltration (UF) is a common procedure performed during almost all dialysis sessions. During UF, several liters of fluid are removed; however, what proportion of this fluid is removed from which fluid space could not be clinically measured easily until now; we designed this study to evaluate the fluid spaces most affected by UF. This is a prospective cohort study of 40 prevalent chronic hemodialysis patients receiving thrice weekly hemodiafiltration (HDF). We measured the patients' fluid spaces using a whole‐body bioimpedance apparatus to evaluate the changes of fluid spaces before and immediately after the HDF sessions. We recorded the data on fluid spaces, UF volume, and blood pressures. The cohort consisted of 40 prevalent HDF patients, aged 60.0 ± 5.2 years (37.5% men; 27.5% people with diabetes), and body weight 71.03 ± 15.48 kg. Achieved UF was 2.38 ± 0.98 L on HDF (measured fluid overload: 2.35 ± 1.44 L). The extracellular fluid (EC) volume decreased from 16.84 ± 3.52 to 14.89 ± 3.06 L (P < 0.0001) and intracellular fluid (IC) volume from 16.88 ± 4.40 to 16.55 ± 4.48 L (P = 0.45). Although urea volume of distribution remained effectively unchanged (31.38 ± 7.28 vs. 30.70 ± 7.32 L; P = 0.45), the degree of EC volume overload decreased from 13.60% ± 7.30% to 3.83% ± 8.32% (P < 0.0001). The mean arterial pressure also decreased from 122.95 ± 19.02 to 108.50 ± 13.91 mmHg (P < 0.0001). We conclude that source of net fluid loss by ultrafiltration is almost exclusively the EC fluid space. The intracellular fluid space is not significantly affected immediately after HDF.     

Effects of frequent hemodialysis on blood pressure: Results from the randomized frequent hemodialysis network trials

Hypertension is a common complication of chronic kidney disease and persists among most patients with end‐stage renal disease despite the provision of conventional thrice weekly hemodialysis (HD). We analyzed the effects of frequent HD on blood pressure in the randomized controlled Frequent Hemodialysis Network trials. The daily trial randomized 245 patients to 12 months of 6× (“frequent”) vs. 3× (“conventional”) weekly in‐center hemodialysis; the nocturnal trial randomized 87 patients to 12 months of 6× weekly nocturnal HD vs. 3× weekly predominantly home‐based hemodialysis. In the daily trial, compared with 3× weekly HD, 2 months of frequent HD lowered predialysis systolic blood pressure by ?7.7 mmHg [95% confidence interval (CI): ?11.9 to ?3.5] and diastolic blood pressure by ?3.9 mmHg [95% CI: ?6.5 to ?1.3]. In the nocturnal trial, compared with 3× weekly HD, 2 months of frequent HD lowered systolic blood pressure by ?7.3 mmHg [95% CI: ?14.2 to ?0.3] and diastolic blood pressure by ?4.2 mmHg [95% CI: ?8.3 to ?0.1]. In both trials, blood pressure treatment effects were sustained until month 12. Frequent HD resulted in significantly fewer antihypertensive medications (daily: ?0.36 medications [95% CI: ?0.65 to ?0.08]; nocturnal: ?0.44 mediations [95% CI: ?0.89 to ?0.03]). In the daily trial, the relative risk per dialysis session for intradialytic hypotension was lower with 6×/week HD but given the higher number of sessions per week, there was a higher relative risk for intradialytic hypotensive requiring saline administration. In summary, frequent HD reduces blood pressure and the number of prescribed antihypertensive medications.     

Assessment of subjective and hemodynamic tolerance of different high‐ and low‐flux dialysis membranes in patients undergoing chronic intermittent hemodialysis: A randomized controlled trial

Clinical experience and experimental data suggest that intradialytic hemodynamic profiles could be influenced by the characteristics of the dialysis membranes. Even within the worldwide used polysulfone family, intolerance to specific membranes was occasionally evoked. The aim of this study was to compare hemodynamically some of the commonly used polysulfone dialyzers in Switzerland. We performed an open‐label, randomized, cross‐over trial, including 25 hemodialysis patients. Four polysulfone dialyzers, A (Revaclear high‐flux, Gambro, Stockholm, Sweden), B (Helixone high‐flux, Fresenius), C (Xevonta high‐flux, BBraun, Melsungen, Germany), and D (Helixone low‐flux, Fresenius, Bad Homburg vor der Höhe, Germany), were compared. The hemodynamic profile was assessed and patients were asked to provide tolerance feedback. The mean score (±SD) subjectively assigned to dialysis quality on a 1–10 scale was A 8.4 ± 1.3, B 8.6 ± 1.3, C 8.5 ± 1.6, D 8.5 ± 1.5. Kt/V was A 1.58 ± 0.30, B 1.67 ± 0.33, C 1.62 ± 0.32, D 1.45 ± 0.31. The low‐ compared with the high‐flux membranes, correlated to higher systolic (128.1 ± 13.1 vs. 125.6 ± 12.1 mmHg, P < 0.01) and diastolic (76.8 ± 8.7 vs. 75.3 ± 9.0 mmHg; P < 0.05) pressures, higher peripheral resistance (1.44 ± 0.19 vs. 1.40 ± 0.18 s × mmHg/mL; P < 0.05) and lower cardiac output (3.76 ± 0.62 vs. 3.82 ± 0.59 L/min; P < 0.05). Hypotension events (decrease in systolic blood pressure by >20 mmHg) were 70 with A, 87 with B, 73 with C, and 75 with D (P < 0.01 B vs. A, 0.05 B vs. C and 0.07 B vs. D). The low‐flux membrane correlated to higher blood pressure levels compared with the high‐flux ones. The Helixone high‐flux membrane ensured the best efficiency. Unfortunately, the very same dialyzer correlated to a higher incidence of hypotensive episodes.     

The long‐term effects of arteriovenous fistula creation on the development of pulmonary hypertension in hemodialysis patients

The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate long‐term effects of arteriovenous fistula (AVF) on the development of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and the relationship between blood flow rate of AVF and pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) in the patients with end‐stage renal disease (ESRD). This prospective study was performed in 20 patients with ESRD. Before an AVF was surgically created for hemodialysis, the patients were evaluated by echocardiography. Then, an AVF was surgically created in all patients. After mean 23.50 ± 2.25 months, the second evaluation was performed by echocardiography. Also, the blood flow rate of AVF was measured at the second echocardiographic evaluation. Pulmonary arterial hypertension was defined as a systolic PAP above 35 mmHg at rest. Mean age of 20 patients with ESRD was 55.05 ± 13.64 years; 11 of 20 patients were males. Pulmonary arterial hypertension was detected in 6 (30%) patients before AVF creation and in 4 (20%) patients after AVF creation. Systolic PAP value was meaningfully lower after AVF creation than before AVF creation (29.95 ± 10.26 mmHg vs. 35.35 ± 7.86 mmHg, respectively, P: 0.047). However, there was no significant difference between 2 time periods in terms of presence of PAH (P>0.05). Pulmonary artery pressure did not correlate with blood flow rate of AVF and duration after AVF creation (P>0.05). In hemodialysis patients, a surgically created AVF has no significant effect on the development of PAH within a long‐term period. Similarly, blood flow rate of AVF also did not affect remarkably systolic PAP within the long‐term period.     

Heparin‐grafted dialysis membrane allows minimal systemic anticoagulation in regular hemodialysis patients: A prospective proof‐of‐concept study

This prospective, multicenter, proof‐of‐concept study aimed to evaluate the possibility to reduce the ordinary heparin dose and the systemic anti‐Xa activity during hemodialysis (HD) sessions using a new heparin‐grafted HD membrane. In 45 stable HD patients, the use of a heparin‐grafted membrane with the ordinary heparin dose was followed by a stepwise weekly reduction of dose. Reduction was stopped when early signs of clotting (venous pressure, quality of rinse‐back) occurred during two out of three weekly HD sessions. Heparin dose was decreased for 67% of patients resulting in the lowering of these patients' anti‐Xa activity by 50%. Dose reductions were achieved with both types of heparin (low‐molecular‐weight heparin: 64 ± 14 to 35 ± 12 IU/kg, P < 0.0001; unfractionated heparin: 82 ± 18 to 46 ± 13 IU/kg, P < 0.0001) resulting in a decrease of anti‐Xa activity at dialysis session end (low‐molecular‐weight heparin: 0.51 ± 0.25 to 0.25 ± 0.11 IU/mL, P < 0.0001; unfractionated heparin: 0.28 ± 0.23 to 0.13 ± 0.07 IU/mL, P < 0.0001). Failure to further decrease heparin dose was related to signs of clotting in blood lines (57% of sessions), in dialyzer (9%), or both (34%). Significant reduction of heparin dose and anti‐Xa activity at the end of HD sessions was possible in stable HD patients using heparin‐grafted membrane. HD patients who require low anti‐Xa activity at the end of HD sessions might benefit from a heparin‐grafted membrane to reduce bleeding risk and other heparin adverse events.     

Evaluation of partial pressure CO2 change in the dialyzer blood inlet during hemodialysis as a measure of vascular access recirculation

Introduction

Vascular access recirculation during hemodialysis is associated with reduced effectiveness and worse survival outcomes. To evaluate recirculation, an increase in pCO₂ in the blood of the arterial line during hemodialysis (threshold of 4.5 mmHg) was proposed. The blood returning from the dialyzer in the venous line has significantly higher pCO₂, so in the presence of recirculation, pCO2 in the arterial blood line may increase (ΔpCO₂) during hemodialysis sessions. The aim of our study was to evaluate ΔpCO₂ as a diagnostic tool for vascular access recirculation in chronic hemodialysis patients.

Methods

We evaluated vascular access recirculation with ΔpCO₂ and compared it with the results of a urea recirculation test, which is the gold standard. ΔpCO₂ was obtained from the difference in pCO₂ in the arterial line at baseline (pCO₂T1) and after 5 min of hemodialysis (pCO₂T2). ∆pCO₂ = pCO₂T2–pCO₂T1.

Findings

In 70 hemodialysis patients (mean age: 70.52 ± 13.97 years; hemodialysis vintage of 41.36 ± 34.54, KT/V 1.4 ± 0.3), ∆pCO₂ was 4 ± 4 mmHg, and urea recirculation was 7% ± 9%. Vascular access recirculation was identified using both methods in 17 of 70 patients, who showed a ∆pCO₂ of 10 ± 5 mmHg and urea recirculation of 20% ± 9%; time in months of hemodialysis was the only difference between vascular access recirculation and non-vascular access recirculation patients (22 ± 19 vs. 46 ± 36, p: 0.05). In the non-vascular access recirculation group, the average ΔpCO₂ was 1.9 ± 2 (p: 0.001), and the urea recirculation % was 2.8 ± 3 (p: 0.001). The ΔpCO₂ correlated with the urea recirculation % (R: 0.728; p < 0.001).

Discussion

ΔpCO₂ in the arterial blood line during hemodialysis is an effective and reliable diagnostic tool for identifying recirculation of the vascular access but not its magnitude. The ΔpCO₂ test application is simple and economical and does not require special equipment.     

Efficacy of losartan for improving insulin resistance and vascular remodeling in hemodialysis patients

Insulin resistance and vascular remodeling are prevalent and predict cardiovascular mortality in hemodialysis patients. Angiotensin II (Ang II) may be involved in both pathogenesis. In the present study, we investigated the effects of the Ang II receptor blocker losartan on insulin resistance, arterial stiffness, and carotid artery structure in hemodialysis patients. Seventy‐two hemodialysis patients were randomly assigned to receive either losartan 50 mg qd (n = 36) or β‐blocker bisoprolol 5 mg qd (n = 36). At the start and at month 12, ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring, aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV) measurements, and carotid artery ultrasound were performed, and homeostasis model assessment index of insulin resistance (HOMA‐IR) was determined. During the study period, bioimpedance method was used to evaluate volume status every 3 months. Home‐monitored BPs were measured at least monthly. Ambulatory BP decreased significantly and similarly by either losartan or bisoprolol. Decreases in PWVs in losartan group at the end of month 12 were significantly greater than changes in PWV in bisoprolol group (0.9 ± 0.3 vs. 0.4 ± 0.5 m/s, P = 0.021). Common carotid artery intima‐media cross‐sectional area decreased significantly only in patients treated with losartan (20.3 ± 4.9 vs. 19.1 ± 5.1 mm², P = 0.001), and HOMA‐IR was also reduced in losartan group only (1.9 ± 1.0 vs. 1.7 ± 0.8, P = 0.003). Multiple regression analysis showed significant correlations between changes in PWV and changes in HOMA‐IR. With comparable BP‐lowering efficacy, losartan achieved better improvement in insulin sensitivity, arterial stiffness, and carotid artery hypertrophy in hemodialysis patients. The regression of arterial stiffness may be in part through attenuation in insulin resistance.     

Unphysiology Is the Major Factor Influencing Cardiovascular Instability during Hemodialysis

Background: Hemodialysis is often complicated by cardiovascular instability (CVI). We studied factors contributing to this problem during 720 hemodialyses (HDs) in 20 patients; 480 dialyses were 6/week and 240 were 3/week. Methods: Dependent variables were increase in pulse rate (PR) and maximal (MAX) and overall (OV) fall of systolic blood pressure (BP). Independent variables were dialyses/week (DIAL), ultrafiltration (Uf), % of body weight (BW), pre‐post BUN (ΔBUN), time on dialysis (T), speed of dialysis (K/V in mL min^–1 kg^–1 BW), target‐postdialysis BW (Ta‐Po BW), Kt/V, ΔPO4, Δbicarbonate, Δpotassium, ΔBUN, an ‘unphysiology index’ summing up changes in electrolytes, and BUN and BW during dialysis (UPI). The relations were analyzed by backward multiple regression analysis. Results: PR increased 0.5 ± 11/min; MAX BP fall was 23 ± 17 mmHg; OV BP fall was 12 ± 19 mmHg. In multiple stepwise backward regression analysis, independents in order of importance: PR = 38 – DIAL × 4 + T × 0.1 + Uf × 1.8 +ΔPO4 × 1.8 – UPI× 0.2 – K/V × 2, r = 0.30, p < 0.0001; MAX BP = UPI × 0.4 – ΔBUN × 0.3 + ΔPO4 × 2.6 + 11, r = 0.34, p < 0.0001; OV BP = UPI × 0.4 – ΔBUN × 0.3 +ΔPO4 × 2.7 + 1, r = 0.33, p < 0.0001. Conclusion: To prevent BP fall and tachycardia during hemodialysis, the most important factor to decrease is unphysiology, i.e., the oscillations in electrolytes, fluid spaces, and osmolality that occur during dialysis. The best way to do this is to dialyze patients daily. An unexpected finding worthy of further investigation was the large detrimental influence of ΔPO4 on CVI.     

Inappropriately elevated endothelin‐1 plays a role in the pathogenesis of intradialytic hypertension

The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of endogenous vasoactive substances on the occurrence of intradialytic hypertension (IDH) in patients during maintenance hemodialysis. Thirty‐four maintenance hemodialysis patients were enrolled in this trial, and 17 of them were diagnosed with IDH (defined as an increase in blood pressure of at least 10 mmHg during or immediately after a hemodialysis session), while 17 age‐matched and sex‐matched controls without IDH were selected for a retrospective comparison. We collected patients' blood samples before and after a dialysis session and measured the plasma levels of N‐terminal fragment brain natriuretic peptide, renin, angiotensin‐II, aldosterone (ALD), angiotensin‐converting enzyme (ACE), endothelin‐1 (ET‐1), nitric oxide (NO), norepinephrine (NOR), and adrenomedullin. The post‐dialysis serum ET‐1 concentrations were significantly higher (4.09 ± 2.06 vs. 2.75 ± 1.34 pg/mL, P < 0.05), while the post‐dialysis ratio of NO to ET‐1 was lower (17.79 ± 5.65 vs. 24.78 ± 12.04, P < 0.05) in IDH patients compared with the control group. Post‐dialysis ALD and NOR values were significantly lower (P < 0.01) and ACE levels were significantly higher (P < 0.01) than the pre‐dialysis concentrations only in the control and not in the IDH group. All other measured factors did not differ significantly between the groups and between pre‐dialysis and post‐dialysis determinations. Compared with blood angiotensin‐II, ALD, ACE, NOR, adrenomedullin, N‐terminal fragment brain natriuretic peptide, and NO status, inappropriately elevated ET‐1 plasma concentrations may play a predominant role in the pathogenesis of IDH.     

Reduced protein bound uraemic toxins in vegetarian kidney failure patients treated by haemodiafiltration

Introduction Indoxyl sulfate (IS) and p cresyl sulfate (PCS) are protein bound toxins which accumulate with chronic kidney disease. Haemodiafiltration (HDF) increases middle molecule clearances and has been suggested to increase IS and PCS clearance. We therefore wished to establish whether higher convective clearances with HDF would reduce IS and PCS concentrations. Methods We measured total plasma IS and PCS in a cohort of 138 CKD5d patients treated by On‐line HDF (Ol‐HDF), by high pressure liquid chromatography. Findings Mean patient age was 64.6 ± 16.5 years, 60.1% male, 57.3% diabetic, median dialysis vintage 25.9 months (12.4–62.0). The mean ICS concentration was 79.8 ± 56.4 umol/L and PCS 140.3 ± 101.8 umol/L. On multivariate analysis, IS was associated with serum albumin (β 4.31,P < 0.001), and negatively with residual renal function (β‐4.1,P = 0.02) and vegetarian diet(β‐28.3, P = 0.048) and PCS negatively with log C reactive protein (β‐75.8, P < 0.001) and vegetarian diet (β‐109, P = 0.001). Vegetarian patients had lower IS and PCS levels (median 41.5 (24.2–71.9) vs. 78.1 (49.5–107.5) and PCS (41.6 (14.2–178.3) vs. 127.3 (77.4–205.6) µmol/L, respectively, P < 0.05. Vegetarian patients had lower preOl‐HDF serum urea, and phosphate (13.8 ±3.8 vs. 18.4 ± 5.2 mmol/L, and 1.33 ± 0.21 vs. 1.58 ± 0.45 mmol/L), and estimated urea nitrogen intake (1.25 ± 0.28 vs. 1.62 ± 0.5 g/kg/day), respectively, all P < 0.05. Discussion Plasma IS and PCS concentrations were not lower with Ol‐HDF compared to previous studies in haemodialysis patients. However those eating a vegetarian diet had reduced IS and PCS concentrations. Although this could be due to differences in dietary protein intake, a vegetarian diet may also potentially reduce IS and PCS production by the intestinal microbiome.     

Role of bicarbonate dialysis in prevention of serious arrhythmias in high‐risk cardiac patients undergoing regular hemodialysis

Background: Cardiac arrhythmias are considered as one of the most important causes of mortality in patients on hemodialysis. Arrhythmias frequently occur in patients with chronic renal failure on regular hemodialysis with reported incidences varying from 30–48% of patients. These abnormalities can span from supraventricular to severe ventricular arrhythmia. There is an increased frequency of occurrence and clustering of arrhythmias around the dialysis time. Aim of the study: To detect the difference between acetate and bicarbonate dialysis as regard to the type and frequency of arrhythmia in those patients. Study design: This study was done on 20 male patients age 51–73, all have history of heart disease. Patients were divided into 2 equal groups using acetate in group 1 and bicarbonate in group 2. All patients were on regular hemodialysis (4 hours, thrice weekly). Careful history and clinical examination were done. Pre‐dialysis investigations included serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, serum sodium, potassium, calcium and phosphorus, serum albumin, hemoglobin, and arterial blood gases. Post‐dialysis serum potassium and arterial blood gases were measured. ECG and forty‐eight hours ambulatory monitor (Holter monitor)(before, during, and after hemodialysis, till the end of the dialysis day and throughout the following day) were performed. Results: Group 1 showed significantly less post‐dialysis supraventricular arrhythmias than in dialysis day (210.9 ± 236 and 62.3 ± 14.4), respectively. Significantly less ventricular arrhythmias in post‐dialysis than in dialysis day (30.7 ± 50.4, and 106.2 ± 128.4), respectively. While in Group 2 there were insignificant differences regarding supraventricular arrhythmias (21.9 ± 28.9 and 16.6 ± 36.3) and ventricular arrhythmias (22.9 + 7.8 and 29.6 + 12.8) in dialysis day than in post‐dialysis day. There was significantly higher frequency of supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias in the dialysis day in acetate hemodialysis in comparison to bicarbonate hemodialysis. Conclusion: Bicarbonate hemodialysis is less arrhythmogenic in comparison to acetate hemodialysis and has better effect on the blood pH and greater degree of base repletion. Continuous ambulatory ECG recording (Holter) is a useful tool in detecting arrhythmias in dialysis patients.     

Aerobic exercise increases phosphate removal during hemodialysis: A controlled trial

Previous studies have suggested that exercise during hemodialysis (HD) could increase the efficacy of solute removal, although this hypothesis has not been conclusively evaluated. The goal of this study was to compare the removal of low‐molecular weight solutes between HD sessions, with and without aerobic exercise. It was a controlled clinical trial, including HD patients in a randomly cross‐over design, such that each patient received a HD session with exercise (intervention) and the next one without exercise (control), three times each. In the exercise sessions, patients pedaled on a cycle ergometer for 60 minutes. The total mass of removed urea, potassium, creatinine, and phosphate were calculated from the solutes concentration in dialysate (continuous spent sampling of dialysate). This was evaluated in a total of 132 HD sessions of patients with a mean age of 54 ± 15 years, 75% male and HD vintage of 3 (2–13) years. Phosphate removal in dialysate during intervention sessions was significantly higher (5.6 [2.5–18.9] vs. 5.1 [1.5–11.2] mg/min) than during control sessions, P = 0.04. The median mass of phosphate removed during control HD session was 1226 (367.8–2697.2) vs. 1348.6 (613.0–4536.2) mg/session during intervention sessions. The exercise did not modify the removal of urea (control 122.6 [61.3–286.0] vs. exercise 112.4 [51.1–250.3] mg/min, P = 0.44), creatinine (control 5.6 [2.5–13.8] vs. exercise 5.6 [2.5–12.8] mg/min, P = 0.49), or potassium (control 13.3 [11.2–15.8] vs. exercise 13.8 [6.6–15.8] mEq/min, P = 0.49). Aerobic exercise during HD increases the efficacy of phosphate removal, without changing urea, creatinine and potassium removal. The implications of this finding in mineral and bone disease and cardiovascular disease need to be evaluated on future clinical trials.