Shear Load Transfer Characteristics of Drilled Shafts in Weathered Rocks

The load distribution and deformation of drilled shafts subjected to axial loads were evaluated by a load-transfer approach. The emphasis was on quantifying the load-transfer mechanism at the interface between the shafts and surrounding highly weathered rocks based on a numerical analysis and on small-scale tension load tests performed on nine instrumented piles. An analytical method that takes into account the soil coupling effect was developed using a modified Mindlin's point load solution. Based on the analysis, a single-modified hyperbolic model is proposed for the shear transfer function of drilled shafts in highly weathered rocks. Through comparisons with field case studies, it is found that the prediction by the present approach is in good agreement with the general trend observed by in situ measurements, and thus represents a significant improvement in the prediction of load deflections of drilled shafts.     

Drilled Shaft Defects: Detection, and Effects on Capacity in Varved Clay

This paper presents the results of nondestructive integrity tests (NDTs) and axial static load tests on drilled shafts constructed in varved clay at the National Geotechnical Experimentation Site in Amherst, Mass. The shafts were constructed with built-in defects to study: (1) the effectiveness of conventional NDT methods in detecting construction defects and (2) the effect of defects on the capacity of drilled shafts. Defects included voids and soil inclusions occupying 5–45% of the cross section as well as a soft bottom. Nine organizations participated in a blind defect prediction symposium, using a variety of NDT techniques. Most participants located defects that were larger than 10% of the cross sectional area. However, false positives and inability to locate smaller defects and multiple defects in the same shaft were encountered. Static load tests indicated that (1) minor defects had little or no effect on skin friction; (2) a soft bottom resulted in a 33% reduction in end bearing relative to a sound bottom; and (3) reloading resulted in a 20–30% reduction in the geotechnical capacity.     

Analytical Method for Load-Transfer Characteristics of Rock-Socketed Drilled Shafts

The load-settlement behavior of rock-socketed drilled shafts under axial loading is investigated by a load-transfer approach. Special attention is given to the shear load-transfer function and an analytical method for estimating load-transfer characteristics of rock-socketed drilled shafts. A nonlinear triple curve is employed to determine the shear load-transfer function of rock-socketed drilled shafts based on the constant normal stiffness direct shear tests and the Hoek-Brown failure criterion. An analytical method that takes into account the soil coupling effect was developed using a modified Mindlin’s point load solution. Through comparisons with field case studies, it is found that the proposed methodology in the present study is in good agreement with the general trend observed by in situ measurements and, thus, represents a significant improvement in the prediction of drilled shaft shear behavior.     

p-y Criterion for Rock Mass

Drilled shafts socketed in rock mass have been used frequently as a foundation system to support both vertical and lateral loads. Traditionally, the lateral interaction between the drilled shaft and the surrounding rock medium has been characterized by means of nonlinear p-y curves; however, there is a lack of well verified p-y criterion for rock mass. In this paper, a hyperbolic p-y criterion is developed based on both theoretical derivations and numerical (finite element) parametric analysis results. The methods for determining pertinent rock parameters needed for constructing the proposed p-y curves are presented in the paper. Two full-scale lateral load tests on large diameter, fully instrumented drilled shafts socketed in rock conducted by the writers, together with additional four load test results reported by Gabr et al. were used to validate the applicability of the proposed hyperbolic p-y curves for rock mass. The comparisons between the computed shaft responses (both deflections and bending moments) and the actual measured responses are considered acceptable.     

Load Testing of a Closed-Ended Pipe Pile Driven in Multilayered Soil

Piles are often driven in multilayered soil profiles. The accurate prediction of the ultimate bearing capacity of piles driven in mixed soil is more challenging than that of piles driven in either clay or sand because the mechanical behavior of these soils is better known. In order to study the behavior of closed-ended pipe piles driven into multilayered soil profiles, fully instrumented static and dynamic axial load tests were performed on three piles. One of these piles was tested dynamically and statically. A second pile served as reaction pile in the static load test and was tested dynamically. A third pile was tested dynamically. The base of each pile was embedded slightly in a very dense nonplastic silt layer overlying a clay layer. In this paper, results of these pile load tests are presented, and the lessons learned from the interpretation of the test data are discussed. A comparison is made of the ultimate base and limit shaft resistances measured in the pile load tests with corresponding values predicted from in situ test-based and soil property-based design methods.     

Numerical Study of an Integral Abutment Bridge Supported on Drilled Shafts

The majority of integral abutment bridges (IABs) in the United States are supported on steel H-piles to provide the flexibility necessary to minimize the attraction of large lateral loads to the foundation and abutment. In Hawaii, steel H-piles have to be imported, corrosion tends to be severe in the middle of the Pacific Ocean, and the low buckling capacity of steel H-piles in scour-susceptible soils has led to a preference for the use of concrete deep foundations. A drilled shaft-supported IAB was instrumented to study its behavior during and after construction over a 45-month period. This same IAB was studied using the finite-element method (FEM) in both two- (2D) and three dimensional (3D). The 3D FEM yields larger overall pile curvature and moments than 2D because in 3D, the high plasticity soil is able to displace in between the drilled shafts thereby “dragging” the shafts to a more highly curved profile while soil flow is restricted by plane strain beam elements in 2D. Measured drilled shaft axial loads were higher than the FEM values mainly due to differences between the assumed and actual axial stiffness and to a lesser extent on concrete creep in the drilled shafts and uneven distribution of loads among drilled shafts. Numerical simulations of thermal and stream loadings were also performed on this IAB.     

Critical Evaluation of Compression Interpretation Criteria for Drilled Shafts

This paper is a critical evaluation of the interpretation criteria of drilled shafts under axial compression loading. A wide variety of load test data are used for analysis, and these data are divided into drained and undrained databases. The interpretation criteria are examined from these load test results to establish a consistent compression interpretation criterion. Among these criteria, the range of each interpretation method presents approximately the same trend for both drained and undrained conditions. The statistical results show that the smaller the compression displacement, the higher the coefficient of variation. Moreover, the undrained load test results reveal less variability than the drained results. The load-displacement curve of a drained loading also demonstrates more ductility than that for undrained loading. Based on these analyses, the relative merits and interrelationships of these criteria are established, and specific design recommendations for the interpretation of compression drilled shaft load test, in terms of both capacity and displacement, are given.     

Relationship between Texas Cone Penetrometer Tests and Axial Resistances of Drilled Shafts Socketed in Clay Shale and Limestone

Modern methods for designing drilled shafts in soft rock require knowledge of the compressive strength and modulus of the rock. However, rock jointing at many sites prohibits the recovery of samples of sufficient length and integrity to test rock cores in either unconfined or triaxial compression tests. Since rational design procedures usually require values of compressive strength, surrogate methods must be employed to estimate the compressive strength of the rock. The surrogate methods considered in this study was Texas cone penetrometer tests, and performed at several sites in North Central Texas. In order to develop the relationships between Texas cone penetrations and side and base resistances of rock socketed drilled shafts, three field load tests were conducted. Based on the field study and literature reviews, a relationship between Texas cone penetration tests and axial resistances of rock socketed drilled shafts was proposed.     

Evaluation of Uplift Interpretation Criteria for Drilled Shaft Capacity

Representative interpretation criteria are examined to evaluate the capacity of drilled shaft foundations under axial uplift loading. A wide variety of uplift load test data are used, and these data are divided into drained and undrained databases. The interpretation criteria are applied to these load test data to establish a consistent uplift interpretation criterion. The results are comparable for both drained and undrained loading. In general, the undrained load test results show somewhat less variability than the drained results. Based on these analyses, the QL2, Q0.5in, and slope tangent methods are the more reliable and consistent, and specific design recommendations for the interpretation of uplift drilled shaft load test are given, in terms of both capacity and displacement.     

Lateral Load Capacity of Drilled Shafts in Jointed Rock

Large vertical (axial) and lateral loads often act on the heads of drilled shafts in jointed rock. In current design practice, the p-y curve method used in design of laterally loaded drilled shafts in soil is often also used for shafts in jointed rock. The p-y curve method treats the soil as a continuum, which is not appropriate in jointed rock, particularly when failure occurs due to sliding on joints. A new discontinuum model was developed to determine the lateral load capacity of drilled shafts or piers in a jointed rock mass with two and three joint sets. It consists two parts: a kinematic and a kinetic analysis. In the kinematic analysis, Goodman and Shi’s block theory is expanded to analyze the removability of a combination of blocks laterally loaded by a pier. Based on the expanded theory, a method was developed to select removable combinations of blocks using easily constructed two-dimensional diagrams. In the kinetic analysis, each kinematically selected removable combination of blocks is examined with the limit equilibrium approach to determine the ultimate lateral load capacity. Although the procedure is similar to slope stability analysis, it is more complicated with the addition of a lateral force and the vertical load exerted by the pier. Simple analytical relations were developed to solve for the ultimate lateral load capacity.     

Nonlinear Analysis of Laterally LoadedRock-Socketed Shafts

In this paper, a nonlinear continuum method is developed to predict the load-displacement response of drilled shafts under lateral loading. The method can consider drilled shafts in a continuum consisting of a soil layer overlying a rock mass layer. The deformation modulus of the soil is assumed to vary linearly with depth, and the deformation modulus of the rock mass is assumed to vary linearly with depth and then to stay constant below the shaft tip. The effect of soil and∕or rock mass yielding on the behavior of shafts is considered by assuming that the soil and∕or rock mass behaves linearly elastically at small strain levels and yields when the soil and∕or rock mass reaction force p (force∕length) exceeds the ultimate resistance pult (force∕length). For the calculation of the ultimate resistance pult of the soil, methods that are available in the literature are used. To calculate the ultimate resistance pult of the rock mass, a method based on the Hoek-Brown strength criterion is proposed. The proposed method is verified by comparing its results with available elastic solutions and field test data, and it is finally applied in the design of a bridge foundation in Massachusetts.     

Assessment of the Axial Load Response of an H Pile Driven in Multilayered Soil

Most of the current design methods for driven piles were developed for closed-ended pipe piles driven in either pure clay or clean sand. These methods are sometimes used for H piles as well, even though the axial load response of H piles is different from that of pipe piles. Furthermore, in reality, soil profiles often consist of multiple layers of soils that may contain sand, clay, silt or a mixture of these three particle sizes. Therefore, accurate prediction of the ultimate bearing capacity of H piles driven in a mixed soil is very challenging. In addition, although results of well documented load tests on pipe piles are available, the literature contains limited information on the design of H piles. Most of the current design methods for driven piles do not provide specific recommendations for H piles. In order to evaluate the static load response of an H pile, fully instrumented axial load tests were performed on an H pile (HP?310×110) driven into a multilayered soil profile consisting of soils composed of various amounts of clay, silt and sand. The base of the H pile was embedded in a very dense nonplastic silt layer overlying a clay layer. This paper presents the results of the laboratory tests performed to characterize the soil profile and of the pile load tests. It also compares the measured pile resistances with those predicted with soil property- and in situ test-based methods.     

Influence of Torque on Lateral Capacity of Drilled Shafts in Sands

As a result of recent changes in the requirements involving hurricane extreme events (e.g., wind velocities), the Florida Department of Transportation has moved away from cable-stayed signs, signals, and lights systems to mast arm/pole structures. Unfortunately, the newer systems develop significant lateral and torque loading on their foundations (e.g., drilled shafts). Current design practice for a mast arm/pole foundation is to treat lateral loading and torsion separately (i.e., uncoupled); however, recent field-testing suggests otherwise. This paper reports on the results of 91 centrifuge tests. 54 of the tests were conducted in dry sand and 37, in saturated sands. The tests varied the lateral load to torque ratios, shaft embedment depths, and soil strengths. The experiments revealed that even though the torsional resistances of the shafts were not influenced by lateral load, the shafts’ lateral resistance was significantly impacted by torsion. Reductions in lateral resistance of 50% were recorded for shafts under high torque to lateral load ratios. Using the free earth support assumption and the ultimate soil pressure the soil pressure distribution along the shaft was developed. Using force and moment equilibrium, as well as the applied torque, maximum shear, and moments were computed. The predicted values were found to be within 25% (10% on average, except for the tests in saturated dense sand with polymer slurry) of the experimental results.     

Cutoff Frequencies for Impulse Response Tests of Existing Foundations

The impulse response test is a nondestructive evaluation technique commonly used for quality control of driven concrete piles and drilled shafts where the pile heads are accessible. When evaluating existing foundations, the presence of a pile cap or other structure makes the pile heads inaccessible and introduces uncertainties in the interpretation of impulse response results. A test section was constructed at the National Geotechnical Experimentation Site (NGES) at Northwestern University to examine the applicability of nondestructive testing methods in evaluating deep foundations under inaccessible-head conditions. This paper focuses on the results of impulse response tests conducted atop the three pile caps at the NGES. Based on field experimentation and numerical simulations, a frequency was determined below which the impulse response test could be used for inaccessible-head conditions. This cutoff frequency primarily depends upon the geometry of the pile cap and pile. A case study is presented that describes impulse response tests obtained on a number of drilled shafts both after the shaft was constructed and after grade beams and walls were built. The results of these tests also follow the trends observed in the NGES tests related to cutoff frequency.     

Full-Scale Field Load Testing of Storm-Water Storage Chamber Structures

One of the latest solutions available for storm-water storage purposes is the underground chamber structure. Recently, a research team at Ohio University conducted a series of field load tests on the underground chambers. Four chamber structures were placed side by side in an excavated area, backfilled with coarse granular soil, buried under a soil cover of 0.46?m (18?in.), instrumented with sensors, and subjected to a series of controlled live load tests at a field project site. The sensor readings and visual inspection results indicate that the chamber with the specified minimum soil cover had no problem in supporting a wheel load of 52.3?kN (11.8?kips) and an axle load of 109.0?kN (24.5?kips) in both the transverse and longitudinal directions. Maximum reduction in the rise dimension was only approximately 2.3% when the chambers were subjected to the live loads. The vertical soil pressure readings measured at the chamber crowns were within 15% of the values given by a live load spreading formula included in the AASHTO LRFD specifications.     

Flexural Performance of Drilled Shafts with Minor Flaws in Stiff Clay

Lateral loads are often the primary forces that act on drilled shafts when they support retaining walls, bridge piers, or building foundations. The construction of drilled shafts often inadvertently introduces flaws that are not always detectable with well-performed nondestructive evaluation (NDE) techniques. The effect of such undetectable minor flaws on the lateral-load performance of drilled shafts needs to be assessed and subsequently considered in the design. This paper summarizes a field study that consisted of NDE of six, full-scale drilled shafts with preinstalled voids and lateral-load tests that were performed on the six test shafts. Results from the field study indicated that undetectable (by NDE) void flaws occupying areas of up to 15% of the cross-sectional area of the drilled shaft could reduce free-head shear capacity up to 16%. A subsequent numerical analysis was performed to filter out all variables, other than void flaws, that could affect the lateral-load deformation of drilled shafts. Numerical analysis results validated the field tests measurements. A parametric study of variables affecting the load-deformation behavior of drilled shafts suggests that a reduction in moment capacity of up to 27% is possible with undetected voids present in the shafts that were tested.     

Field Behavior of an Integral Abutment Bridge Supported on Drilled Shafts

The abutments of integral bridges are traditionally supported on a single row of steel-H-piles that are flexible and that are able to accommodate lateral deflections well. In Hawaii, steel-H-piles have to be imported, corrosion tends to be severe in the middle of the Pacific Ocean, and the low buckling capacity of steel-H-piles in scour-susceptible soils has led to a preference for the use of drilled shaft foundations. A drilled shaft-supported integral abutment bridge was monitored from foundation installation to in-service behavior. Strain gauge data indicate that drilled shaft foundations worked well for this integral bridge. After 45 months, the drilled shafts appear to remain uncracked. However, inclinometer readings provide a conflicting viewpoint. Full passive earth pressures never developed behind the abutments as a result of temperature loading because thermal movements were small and the long term movements were dominated by concrete creep and shrinkage of the superstructure that pulled the abutments towards the stream. In the stream, hydrodynamic loading during the wet season had a greater effect on the abutment movements than seasonal temperature cycling. After becoming integral, the upright members of the longitudinal bridge frame were not vertical because the excavation and backfilling process caused deep seated movements of the underlying clay resulting in the drilled shafts bellying out towards the stream. This indicates the importance and need for staged construction analysis in design of integral bridges in highly plastic clays. Also, the drilled shaft axial loads from strain gauges are larger than expected.     

Predicting End Bearing Capacity of Post-Grouted Drilled Shaft in Cohesionless Soils

Although pressure grouting beneath the tips of drilled shafts had been used successfully worldwide for close to 4?decades, it has remained relatively unused in the United States in part due to the absence of a rational design procedure. Previous international usage relied predominantly upon experience and unpublished proprietary approaches. More recently, research aimed at quantifying the improvement that could be derived from postgrouting drilled shaft tips has resulted in a design methodology. This paper briefly discusses the postgrouting process and outlines the full scale test programs used to identify parameters affecting postgrouting performance. Correlations developed between applied grout pressure and end bearing improvement are presented along with a numerical example illustrating the design procedure.     

Field Investigation of a Sandwich Plate System Bridge Deck

This paper presents the results of a live-load test of the Shenley Bridge, the first bridge application of the sandwich plate system technology in North America. The investigation focused on the evaluation of in-service performance including lateral load distribution behavior and dynamic load allowance. Real-time midspan deflections and strain values were measured under both static and dynamic conditions and under various loading configurations to assess the in-service performance. Distribution factors were determined for interior and exterior girders subjected to single and paired truck loadings. In addition, dynamic load allowance was determined from a comparison of the bridge’s response under static conditions to the response under dynamic conditions. From a comparison of measured results to AASHTO LRFD, AASHTO standard, and CHBDC provisions, it was determined that the current provisions tend to produce conservative predictions for lateral load distribution, but can be unconservative for dynamic load allowance. As a result of the testing program containing a single field test, a finite-element model was also used for determination of lateral load distribution and yielded predictions similar to measured results. The results from the finite-element models were often less conservative than the code provisions.     

Pile Drag Load and Downdrag in a Liquefaction Event

Sandy soils may undergo compression during liquefaction. A review of published design manuals, including the 2004 AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, indicates that some recommendations for pile design may not represent the pile response in a manner consistent with the actual axial response of the pile during liquefaction. The actual response is discussed in light of the unified pile design method and separated between liquefaction occurring above and below the static nonliquefied neutral plane location before the liquefaction event. In the former case, the effect on the pile is minor regardless of the magnitude of liquefaction-induced settlement of the surrounding soil. In the latter case, the axial compressive load in the pile increases and additional pile settlement (downdrag) will occur when the force equilibrium is reestablished through the necessary mobilization of additional toe resistance. This means that the magnitude of the downdrag is governed by the pile toe load-movement response to the downward shift of the neutral plane. While there is a reduction in shaft resistance due to the reduction in strength within the liquefied layers, this reduction will only influence the pile design length where the liquefying layer is very thick.