考虑消费者参考效应的双渠道乳制品供应链协调机制设计

将消费者对乳制品新鲜度的参考效应引入第三方物流(third party logistics,TPL)服务商参与的双渠道乳制品供应链中,考虑到乳制品新鲜度受到制造商加工水平和TPL服务商物流服务水平的共同影响,构建分散式、集中式以及引入基于二部定价的成本共担契约下的微分博弈模型,求解并比较3种情形下供应链成员的最优均衡策...     

基于零售商创新投入的双渠道供应链协调策略

针对制造商在传统实体渠道的基础上积极开辟网络渠道的双渠道供应链,从消费者效用理论角度构建单一渠道和双渠道供应链Stackelberg博弈模型,在零售商创新投入和消费者渠道偏好扰动因素下,探讨制造商开辟网络渠道形成的渠道竞争效应,寻求供应链系统的组合优化策略,通过一个双重协调机制改善供应链运作效率.研究表明:批发价格、零售价格及创新投入水平的最优组合策略可实现供应链优化;制造商和零售商利润均与创新投入水平呈特定函数关系;网络渠道的引进可降低零售商定价和利润,减少实体渠道市场份额,但总需求增加;双重协调机制可缓解渠道冲突.最后通过数值仿真结果验证了协调机制的可行性.     

不同契约机制下考虑再制造的双渠道供应链决策

针对由单一制造商和单一再制造商组成的双渠道供应链博弈问题,考虑碳减排水平对再制造产品需求的影响,引入渠道偏好系数和产品替代系数,构建不同契约下的双渠道供应链决策模型,分析制造商如何通过有效的协调机制激励再制造商提高减排水平.研究表明,改进的成本分担-收益共享契约可以实现再制造商的减排水平达到集中决策的水平,并发现改进契约机制下协调系数的变化范围还受交叉需求替代系数和消费者对减排水平认知度的影响.     

考虑价格和服务水平竞争的垂直双渠道供应链决策模型

针对垂直双渠道供应链中零售商在电子直销渠道和传统零售渠道销售同质品的情况,分别建立价格替代系数扰动下、服务水平替代系数扰动下、价格替代系数和服务水平替代系数同时扰动下的需求模型和利润模型,利用求解最优利润的条件,提出3种不同扰动情形的最优决策.研究表明:在一定扰动范围内,制造商可以通过保持产量,调整两条渠道的价格和服务水平获得该情形下的最优利润;当扰动超出一定范围时,制造商可以通过改变产量,调整两条渠道的价格和服务水平获得该情形下的最优利润.     

制造商主导型双渠道供应链协调决策模型

以制造商主导型供应链为研究对象, 分析双渠道供应链协调策略问题. 引入双渠道价格敏感系数和竞争系数两个变量, 分别建立双渠道供应链集中决策、分散决策和协调决策的3 种模型. 研究结果表明, 不同合同策略协调后, 零售商和供应链整体收益增加; 经两部定价和批发价格合同协调, 零售商需要支付固定费用给制造商才能够达到协调, 而经Shapley 值法分配合同协调, 则双渠道供应链可直接达到协调效果.

     

考虑风险容忍度的双渠道绿色供应链运营决策及协调研究

针对双渠道绿色供应链,在考虑各方不同风险容忍度的基础上,构建以制造商为主导的供应链博弈模型,利用均值方差法分析集中式决策和批发价格契约下参与方的运营决策和期望利润,并设计协调契约.研究发现:在批发价格契约下,产品绿色度与制造商风险容忍度正相关,与零售商风险容忍度无关;最优零售价格均与双方风险容忍度正相关,且线上价格基准系数与直销价格负相关,与零售价格正相关;当绿色产品对消费者需求影响较大时,零售商的期望利润与制造商风险容忍度正相关.带有转移支付的反向收益共享与成本分担组合契约可实现双渠道绿色供应链的协调.     

损失厌恶下考虑参照利润效应的供应链决策模型

针对由一个风险中性供应商和一个损失厌恶零售商构成的二级供应链,研究随机需求下考虑零售商参照利润效应的供应链决策问题.在回购政策下,建立以供应商为主方、零售商为从方的Stackelberg主从博弈模型.结合参照依赖偏好模型分别得到集中和分散供应链决策,分析供应链最优决策与损失厌恶程度、参照利润强度和零售商乐观水平之间的关系,并进一步设计能够实现供应链完美协调的回购契约机制.研究结果表明,在集中和分散供应链决策下,零售商订货量均随着损失厌恶和乐观程度的增加而减少.而当零售商损失厌恶程度较低时,订货量随参照利润强度的增加而增加;反之,亦成立.对于批发价格决策,则存在一个阈值,当高于该阈值时,批发价格随着零售商损失厌恶、乐观程度和参照利润强度的增大而增加;低于该阈值时,批发价格随着损失厌恶、乐观程度和参照利润强度的增大而降低.     

考虑Showrooms效应的供应链定价与渠道模式策略

构建双渠道和线上到线下(O2O)两种模式下的供应链博弈模型,研究Showrooms效应影响下的供应链定价和渠道模式策略选择问题.研究结果表明:无论何种渠道模式,Showrooms效应和线下展厅服务使得制造商和零售商提高线上和线下渠道的零售价格;双渠道模式下制造商将降低批发价格,而O2O模式下制造商不一定降低批发价格.线下展厅服务和Showrooms效应可以增加线上、线下渠道和总需求量,实现零售商利润增加,零售商会提供线下展厅服务并愿意接受O2O模式.只有当Showrooms效应较小时,制造商选择O2O模式,此模式在大部分条件下可以提高供应链运作效率.因此,当Showrooms效应和线上渠道需求比例满足一定条件时,O2O模式是制造商和零售商的一致选择,从而实现由双渠道模式到O2O模式的成功转型.     

考虑参照价格效应的易逝品定价与订购策略

在考虑消费者参照价格效应的基础上,构建一个易逝品的定价与订购联合决策模型,其中产品的需求不仅依赖于销售价格还与该产品在消费者心目中的参照价格相关,变质率为常数,系统不允许缺货.分别讨论了对称参照价格效应和非对称参照价格效应两种情况下零售商的最优定价与订购决策问题,证明并得到关于模型结构的一些性质,进而设计了问题的求解算法.通过数值方法分析了参照价格效应参数和变质率对系统最优解的影响,以及两种情况下最优解之间的关系.结果显示:当面对具有参照价格依赖的消费者时,采用适当的营销策略来提高消费者的参照价格对零售商总是有利的;对高变质率产品而言,零售商可保持一个较稳定的订购策略,更多地关注产品的定价策略;面对损失厌恶型消费者,随着消费者参照价格的逐渐提高,零售商的定价与订购策略均应缓慢地改变,而不宜急剧变化.     

考虑建议零售价的双渠道供应链批发价格模式选择

对由制造商网络直销渠道和零售商传统渠道构成的双渠道供应链系统进行研究。首次在建议零售价背景下研究了批发价格模式选择问题,运用制造商主导的Stackelberg博弈,得出了供应链各成员的价格均衡策略。综合考虑零售商谈判能力和和消费者对渠道的偏好度,对比分析了不同批发价谈判模式下的制造商利润、零售商利润和供应链利润。结果表明,制造商可通过建议零售价调整市场价格;从供应链总体或者零售商角度,以直销价格为基准确定批发价格是最优的;制造商倾向于单独确定批发价格,但当零售商谈判能力较弱,且网络渠道基本市场份额偏大时,也可接受以网络直销价为基准确定批发价格。     

考虑企业社会责任的物流服务供应链定价与协调

为了分析承担社会责任对物流服务供应链定价决策的影响, 考虑企业社会责任, 分别构建集中和分散决策下的定价博弈模型, 求得供应链最优定价策略和双方所承担的企业社会责任成本. 对比发现, 分散决策下供应链存在效率损失, 进而基于收益共享契约对其进行协调. 研究表明, 考虑企业社会责任和集中决策时, 物流服务供应链总利润更大, 且双方利润都与其社会责任效用因子正相关, 收益共享契约能有效地对物流服务供应链进行协调. 最后通过算例验证了结论的正确性.     

Research on closed loop supply chain with reference price effect

This paper considers a closed loop supply chain with the manufacturer as the Stackelberg leader. The manufacturer faces three different reverse channels, i.e., (1) manufacturer-managed, (2) retailer-managed, or (3) third party-managed channels. The reference price affects the purchase decision of consumers. Based on game theory, we discuss the reference price effect on the performances across three decentralized reverse channels, and examine the impact of reference price parameter (i.e., reference price coefficient in this paper) on optimal strategies. We conclude that higher reference price coefficient results in lower manufacturer and retailer profits. However, the profit of the third party increases in the reference price coefficient. In addition, some meaningful insights can be derived by comparison without the reference price effect in our models. We found that the scenario without reference price effect is generally superior to that with reference price effect.     

Pricing and production decisions in dual-channel supply chains with demand disruptions

This paper develops a two-period pricing and production decision model in a one- manufacturer-one-retailer dual-channel supply chain that experiences a disruption in demand during the planning horizon. While disruption management has long been a key research issue in supply chain management, little attention has been given to disruption management in a dual-channel supply chain once the original production plan has been made. Generally, changes to the original production plan induced by a disruption may impose considerable deviation costs throughout the supply chain system. In this paper, we examine how to adjust the prices and the production plan so that the potential maximal profit is obtained under a disruption scenario. We first study the scenario where the manufacturer and the retailer are vertically integrated with demand disruptions. Then we further assume that the manufacturer bears the deviation costs and obtain the manufacturer’s and the retailer’s individual optimal pricing decision, as well as the manufacturer’s optimal production quantity in a decentralized decision-making setting. We derive conditions under which the maximum profit can be achieved. The results indicate that the optimal production quantity has some robustness under a demand disruption, in both centralized and decentralized dual-channel supply chains. We also find that the optimal pricing decisions are affected by customers’ preference for the direct channel and the market scale change, in both centralized and decentralized dual-channel supply chains.     

The price of anarchy in closed-loop supply chains

This paper measures the worst-case efficiency of price-only contracts in closed-loop supply chains (CLSCs) with the price of anarchy (PoA). We model a single-period Stackelberg game in which a manufacturer sells new products to a retailer and collects used products with exogenous retail price and collection price via three alternative reverse channels: (a) the manufacturer collects directly from customers, (b) the retailer collects for the manufacturer, and (c) a third party is awarded a collection subcontract from the manufacturer. We carry out a comprehensive investigation under push–pull configurations to observe how reverse channel structures with different gaming sequences of CLSC members influence the worst-case performance when the demand distribution is over the set of increasing generalized failure rate distributions. From our PoA analysis, we find that the pull system does not always outperform the push system, especially when the retailer is the leader, in contrast to the results for forward supply chains. While the PoA of the push system is dramatically sensitive to the quality condition of used products, the pull system has a constant efficiency loss that is independent of the quality condition. Instead, the PoA of the pull system solely changes with the gaming sequence of the manufacturer. We also find that manufacturer's direct collection is a better reverse channel choice compared to retailer's collection. Additional managerial insights are summarized for discussion.     

考虑参照价格效应和消费者行为的预售及退货策略

生产商通过预售可以提前获取市场需求信息,但由于消费者产品估值的不确定性,生产商可能面临现货期大量退货的风险,制定合理的预售与退货策略成为生产商必须解决的核心问题.鉴于此,运用报童模型和消费者期望效用理论,考虑参照价格效应对消费者购买行为以及生产商预售期定价策略的影响,构建单一预售、预售退货不再出售、预售退货再出售3种策...     

考虑公平关切的服务供应链协调契约

针对服务集成商公平关切行为, 建立了服务提供商和服务集成商的博弈模型, 分析论证了批发价契约无法实现服务供应链协调的问题, 探讨了“成本共担+收入共享” 组合式契约协调的有效性. 研究结果表明, 成本共担契约和收入共享契约都无法实现服务供应链的协调, 而组合式契约不仅能有效协调服务供应链, 且协调具有一定柔性, 但随着服务集成商公平关切程度的增加, 服务提供商与服务集成商的协调空间变小, 协调柔性减弱, 且对服务提供商更不利.