Miscibility enhancement on the immiscible binary blend of poly(vinyl acetate) and poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) with bisphenol A

The miscibility behavior and hydrogen bonding of ternary blends of bisphenol A (BPA)/poly(vinyl acetate) (PVAc)/poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) (PVP) were investigated by using differential scanning calorimetry and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). The BPA is miscible with both PVAc and PVP based on the observed single T_g over the entire composition range. FTIR was used to study the hydrogen-bonding interaction between the hydroxyl group of BPA and the carbonyl group of PVAc and PVP at various compositions. Furthermore, the addition of BPA is able to enhance the miscibility of the immiscible PVAc/PVP binary blend and eventually transforms into miscible blend with single T_g, when a sufficiently quantity of the BPA is present due to the significant Δχ and the ΔK effect.     

Achieving miscible ternary polymer blends with hydrogen bonding

Poly(vinyl phenol) (PVPh) has previously been found to be successful in making immiscible poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA)/poly(vinyl acetate) (PVAc) miscible. Poly(ethyl methacrylate) (PEMA) with one more methyl group than PMMA is also immiscible with PVAc. PEMA and PVAc are miscible with PVPh according to the literature. To determine whether PVPh can also cosolubilize PEMA/PVAc, PVPh samples of two different molecular weights have been mixed in this study with PEMA and PVAc to produce a ternary blend. On the basis of the calorimetry data, the ternary PEMA/PVAc/PVPh blend, regardless of the molecular weight of PVPh, has been determined to be miscible. The reason for the observed miscibility is probably that the interactions between PVAc and PVPh are similar in magnitude to those between PEMA and PVPh. A modified Kwei equation based on the binary interaction parameters proposed previously is used to describe the experimental glass‐transition temperature of the miscible ternary blend almost quantitatively well. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 101: 643–652, 2006     

Miscible blends containing bacterial poly(3‐hydroxyvalerate) and poly(p‐vinyl phenol)

The miscibility of poly(3‐hydroxyvalerate) (PHV)/poly(p‐vinyl phenol) (PVPh) blends has been studied by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. The blends are miscible as shown by the existence of a single glass transition temperature (T_g) and a depression of the equilibrium melting temperature of PHV in each blend. The interaction parameter was found to be −1.2 based on the analysis of melting point depression data using the Nishi–Wang equation. Hydrogen‐bonding interactions exist between the carbonyl groups of PHV and the hydroxyl groups of PVPh as evidenced by FTIR spectra. The crystallization of PHV is significantly hindered by the addition of PVPh. The addition of 50 wt % PVPh can totally prevent PHV from cold crystallization. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 74: 383–388, 1999     

Effect of thermal treatments on the miscibility of poly(vinyl cinnamate) binary blends

Poly(vinyl cinnamate) (PVCN) could undergo thermal or photo crosslinking. PVCN was previously found to be miscible with poly(vinyl phenol) (PVPh) [also named poly(hydroxystyrene)]. In this article, the miscibility between PVCN with or without thermal crosslinking and poly(styrene‐co‐hydrostyrene) (designated as MPS) was investigated. PVCN was determined to be miscible with MPS with 15% of hydroxystyrene (MPS‐15) at two compositions but partially miscible or immiscible at PVCN/MPS‐15(50/50) composition. For MPS with 5% of hydroxystyrene (MPS‐5), two T_g values were detected indicating mostly immiscibility. However, PVCN after thermal crosslinking was determined to be miscible with both MPS‐5 and MPS‐15. Immiscibility was found between thermally crosslinked PVCN and PVPh different from miscibility in the original PVCN/PVPh blends. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Miscible blends of poly(4‐vinyl phenol)/poly (trimethylene terephthalate)

A new miscible blend of all compositions comprising poly(4‐vinyl phenol) (PVPh) and poly(trimethylene terephthalate) (PTT) was discovered and reported. The blends exhibit a single composition‐dependent glass transition and homogeneous phase morphology, with no lower critical solution temperature (LCST) behavior upon heating to high temperatures. Interactions and spherulite growth kinetics in the blends were also investigated. The Flory–Huggins interaction parameter (χ₁₂) and interaction energy density (B) obtained from analysis of melting point depression are negative (χ₁₂ = ?0.74 and B = ?32.49 J cm^?3), proving that the PVPh/PTT blends are miscible over a wide temperature range from ambient up to high temperatures in the melt state. FTIR studies showed evidence of hydrogen‐bonding interactions between the two polymers. The miscibility of PVPh with PTT also resulted in a reduction in spherulite growth rate of PTT in the miscible blend. The Lauritzen–Hoffman model was used to analyze the spherulite growth kinetics, which showed a lower fold‐surface free energy (σ_e) of the blends than that of the neat PTT. The decrease in the fold‐surface free energy has been attributed to disruption of the PTT lamellae exerted by PVPh in an intimately interacted miscible state. Copyright © 2004 Society of Chemical Industry     

Reexamination of the miscibility of stereoregular poly(methyl methacrylate) with poly(vinyl phenol)

Previously, isotactic, atactic, and syndiotactic poly(methyl methacrylates) (PMMAs) (designated as iPMMA, aPMMA, and sPMMA) were mixed with poly(vinyl phenol) (PVPh) separately in tetrahydrofuran (THF) to make three polymer blend systems. According to calorimetry data, iPMMA was found to be miscible with PVPh; however, partial miscibility or immiscibility was found between aPMMA (or sPMMA) and PVPh. According to the article by C. J. T. Landry and D. M. Teegarden, Macromolecules, 1991, 24, 4310, THF is the reason for causing aPMMA and PVPh to phase separate, but 2‐butanone instead produces miscible blends. Therefore, in this article these three polymer systems were investigated again using 2‐butanone as solvent. Films were prepared under specific conditions to minimize the effect of aggregation in PMMA. The formation of hydrogen bonding between PMMA and PVPh and the attendant changes in the aggregation of PMMA segments were determined in the solid states by means of FTIR. Based on the results of calorimetry, iPMMA and aPMMA were found to be miscible with PVPh. For iPMMA/PVPh blends, different degrees of hydrogen bonding were observed based on DSC data and FTIR spectra when compared to previous study. An elevation of the glass transition temperatures (T_gs) of aPMMA/PVPh blends above weight average was detected and the T_g values were fitted well by the Kwei equation. But partial miscibility was still found between sPMMA and PVPh on account of the observation of two T_gs in most compositions. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 83: 1425–1431, 2002     

Miscibility and intermolecular hydrogen‐bonding interactions in poly(3‐hydroxybutyrate‐co‐3‐hydroxyhexanoate)/poly(4‐vinyl phenol) binary blends

The miscibility and hydrogen bonding interaction in the poly(3‐hydroxybutyrate‐co‐3‐hydroxyhexanoate)/poly(4‐vinyl phenol) [P(3HB‐co‐3HH)/PVPh] binary blends were investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). The DSC results indicate that P(3HB‐co‐3HH) with 20 mol % 3HH unit content is fully miscible with PVPh, and FTIR studies reveal the existence of hydrogen bonding interaction between the carbonyl groups of P(3HB‐co‐3HH) and the hydroxyl groups of PVPh. The effect of blending of PVPh on the mechanical properties of P(3HB‐co‐3HH) were studied by tensile testing. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 2007     

Effect of tacticity of poly(methyl methacrylate) on the miscibility with poly(vinyl pyrrolidone)

Isotactic, atactic, and syndiotactic poly(methyl methacrylates) (PMMA) (designated iPMMA, aPMMA, and sPMMA) with approximately the same molecular weight were mixed separately with poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) (PVP) primarily in chloroform to make three polymer blend systems. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) was used to study the miscibility of these blends. The results showed that the tacticity of PMMA has a definite impact on its miscibility with PVP. The aPMMA/PVP and sPMMA/PVP blends were found to be miscible because all the prepared films showed composition-dependent glass-transition temperatures (T_g). The glass-transition temperatures of the aPMMA/PVP blends are equal to or lower than weight average and can be qualitatively described by the Gordon–Taylor equation. The glass-transition temperatures of the other miscible blends (i.e., sPMMA/PVP blends) are mostly higher than weight average and can be approximately fitted by the simplified Kwei equation. The iPMMA/PVP blends were found to be immiscible or partially miscible based on the observation of two glass-transition temperatures. The immiscibility is probably attributable to a stronger interaction among isotactic MMA segments because its ordination and molecular packing contribute to form a rigid domain. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 81: 3190–3197, 2001     

Binary and ternary polymer blends containing poly(vinylidene chloride‐co‐acrylonitrile)

Poly(vinylidene chloride‐co‐acrylonitrile) (Saran F), poly(hydroxy ether of bisphenol A) (phenoxy), poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (PSAN), and poly(vinyl phenol) (PVPh) all have the same characteristic: miscibility with atactic poly(methyl methacrylate) (aPMMA). However, the miscibility of Saran F with the other polymer (phenoxy, PSAN, or PVPh) is not guaranteed and was thus investigated. Saran F was found to be miscible only with PSAN but not miscible with phenoxy and PVPh. Because Saran F and PVPh are not miscible, although they are both miscible with aPMMA, aPMMA can thus be used as a potential cosolvent to homogenize PVPh/Saran F. The second part of this report focused on the miscibility of a ternary blend consisting of Saran F, PVPh, and aPMMA to investigate the cosolvent effect of aPMMA. Factors affecting the miscibility were studied. The established phase diagram indicated that the ternary blends with high PVPh/Saran F weight ratio were found to be mostly immiscible. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 91: 3068–3073, 2004     

The totally miscible in ternary hydrogen‐bonded polymer blend of poly(vinyl phenol)/phenoxy/phenolic

The individual binary polymer blends of phenolic/phenoxy, phenolic/poly(vinyl phenol) (PVPh), and phenoxy/PVPh have specific interaction through intermolecular hydrogen bonding of hydroxyl–hydroxyl group to form homogeneous miscible phase. In addition, the miscibility and hydrogen bonding behaviors of ternary hydrogen bond blends of phenolic/phenoxy/PVPh were investigated by using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and optical microscopy. According to the DSC analysis, every composition of the ternary blend shows single glass transition temperature (T_g), indicating that this ternary hydrogen‐bonded blend is totally miscible. The interassociation equilibrium constant between each binary blend was calculated from the appropriate model compounds. The interassociation equilibrium constant (K_A) of each individually binary blend is higher than any self‐association equilibrium constant (K_B), resulting in the hydroxyl group tending to form interassociation hydrogen bond. Photographs of optical microscopy show this ternary blend possess lower critical solution temperature (LCST) phase diagram. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2009     

Effect of the tacticity of poly(methyl methacrylate) on the phase diagram of its ternary blends

Previously, isotactic and atactic poly(methyl methacrylates) (PMMAs) were found to be miscible with poly(vinyl phenol) (PVPh) and poly(hydroxy ether of bisphenol‐A) (phenoxy) because all the prepared films were transparent and showed composition‐dependent glass transition temperatures (T_g's). However, syndiotactic PMMA was immiscible with PVPh because most of the cast films had two T_g's. On the contrary, syndiotactic PMMA was still miscible with phenoxy. According to our preliminary results, PVPh and phenoxy are not miscible. Also to our knowledge, nobody has reported any results concerning the effect of the tacticity of PMMA on its ternary blend containing PVPh and phenoxy. The miscibility of a ternary blend consisting of PVPh, phenoxy, and tactic PMMA was thus investigated and reported in this article. Calorimetry was used as the principal tool to study miscibility. An approximate phase diagram of the ternary blends containing different tactic PMMA was established, probably for the first time, based on differential scanning calorimetry data. Immiscibility was found in most of the studied ternaries but a slight difference due to the effect of tacticity of PMMA was definitely observed. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 86: 2720–2726, 2002     

A high‐resolution solid‐state NMR investigation of molecular mobility of poly(methyl methacrylate)/poly(vinyl pyrrolidone)/poly(ethylene oxide) ternary blends

The ternary blends of poly(methyl methacrylate)/poly(vinyl pyrrolidone)/poly(ethylene oxide), PMMA/PVP/PEO, were prepared by melting process, using a Haake plastograph, and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR) was used as a methodology to characterize the molecular mobility of blend components, because NMR has several techniques that allow us to evaluate polymeric materials in different time scales. The NMR results showed that the blends were miscible on a molecular level. The values of proton lattice relaxation time in the rotating frame (T₁ρH) indicate that the ternary blend interaction did not reduce the intermolecular distance, because it is dipole–dipole. The molecular motion of each component, even in the miscible amorphous phase and the addition of PEO, has a definitive effect on the PMMA molecular mobility. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 100: 1492–1495, 2006     

Influence of tacticity of poly(methyl methacrylate) on the compatibility with poly(vinyl phenol)

Isotactic, atactic, and syndiotactic poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) were mixed with poly(vinyl phenol) (PVPh) separately in tetrahydrofuran to make three polymer blend systems. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy were used to study the miscibility of these blends. Isotactic PMMA was found to be more miscible with PVPh than atactic or syndiotactic PMMA. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 66: 1773–1780, 1997     

Miscibility of poly(caprolactone)/chlorinated polypropylene and poly(caprolactone)/poly(chlorostyrene) blends

Poly(caprolactone) (PCL) was blended with poly(chlorostyrene) (PSCI) and chlorinated polypropylene (PPCl). A single glass transition temperature T_g was found for these mixtures, indicating their miscibility. PCL crystallizes in these blends when the chlorinated polymer content is not too high. Otherwise, T_g becomes higher than the melting point of PCL and the high viscosity of the medium hinders the crystallization. The miscibility of PCL/PPCI blends cannot be due to hydrogen bonding between the α-hydrogens of the chlorinated polymer and the carbonyl group of the polyester since PPCI does not have available a large number of α-hydrogens. It is suggested that a dipoledipole ? C?O…Cl? C? interaction is responsible for the observed miscibility phenomenon and that this interaction is probably also responsible for the miscibility between all other polyesterchlorinated polymer mixtures. Finally, it was observed that poly(α-methyl-α-n-propyl-β-propiolactone), poly(α-methyl-α-ethyl-β-propiolactone) and poly(valerolactone) are not miscible with PSCI or PPCl, despite the fact that they are miscible with poly(vinyl chloride).     

Free volume microprobe studies on poly(methyl methacrylate)/poly(vinyl chloride) and poly(vinyl chloride)/polystyrene blends

Blends of Poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA)/Poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC) and Poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC)/Polystyrene (PS) of different compositions were prepared by solution casting technique. The blends were characterized using Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC), Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR), and Positron Lifetime Spectroscopy. DSC data were found to be inadequate to describe whether PMMA/PVC blends are miscible or not, possibly because of the small gap in their glass transition temperatures. On the other hand, PVC/PS blends were clearly found to be immiscible by DSC. FTIR results for PMMA/PVC indicate the possible interactions between the carbonyl group of PMMA and α‐hydrogen of PVC. Free volume data derived from Positron lifetime measurements showed that the PMMA/PVC blends to be miscible in low PVC concentration domain. For the first time, the authors have evaluated the hydrodynamic interaction parameter α, advocated by Wolf and Schnell, Polymer, 42, 8599 (2001), to take into account the friction between the component molecules using the free volume data. This parameter (α) has a high value (?57) at 10 wt% of PVC, which could be taken to read miscibility for PMMA/PVC blends to be high. In the case of PVC/PS blends, the positron results fully support the DSC data to conclude the blends to be immiscible throughout the range of concentration. As expected, the hydrodynamic interaction parameter α does not show any change throughout the concentration in PVC/PS blends, further supporting the idea that α is another suitable parameter in the miscibility study of polymer blends. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 46:1231–1241, 2006. © 2006 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Miscibility and crystallization of biodegradable poly(butylene succinate-co-butylene adipate)/poly(vinyl phenol) blends

Miscibility, crystallization kinetics, crystal structure, and microstructure of biodegradable poly(butylene succinate-co-butylene adipate) (PBSA)/poly(vinyl phenol) (PVPh) blends were studied by differential scanning calorimetry, optical microscopy, wide angle X-ray diffraction, and small angle X-ray scattering in detail in this work. PBSA and PVPh are miscible as evidenced by the single composition dependent glass transition temperature and the negative polymer-polymer interaction parameter. Isothermal crystallization kinetics of PBSA/PVPh blends was investigated and analyzed by the Avrami equation. The overall crystallization rates of PBSA decrease with increasing crystallization temperature and the PVPh content in the PBSA/PVPh blends; however, the crystallization mechanism of PBSA does not change in the blends. Furthermore, blending with PVPh does not modify the crystal structure of PBSA. The microstructural parameters, including the long period, thickness of crystalline phase and thickness of amorphous phase, all become larger with increasing the PVPh content, indicating that PVPh mainly resides in the interlamellar region of PBSA spherulites in the blends.     

Towards the simulation of poly(vinyl phenol)/poly(vinyl methyl ether) blends by atomistic molecular modelling

Molecular simulations of poly(vinyl phenol)/poly(vinyl methyl ether) (PVPh/PVME) blends were performed and their degree of miscibility evaluated as a preliminary step before orientation simulations. A minimum of three periodic boundary condition amorphous models was constructed and analysed in terms of solubility parameter, X-ray pattern, pair correlation function, hydrogen bond fraction and backbone conformation. The values obtained are consistent with miscibility of the systems, although it is suggested that the degree of mixing is not uniform for the different models.     

Blends of poly(vinyl acetate) and poly(ethyl methacrylate): Some mechanical properties

Poly(vinyl acetate) (PVAc) and poly(ethyl methacrylate) (PEMA) were solution blended in chloroform and cast into films on mercury surface. Some mechanical properties of the films were studied with the Instron Testing Machine. Tensile strength (TS), initial modulus (IM) and elongation at break of the films were found to depend highly on blend composition, and increased above the values for the pure polymers, each showing a peak at about 20% PEMA. The peak values of TS, IM, and elongation at break depended on an important factor, (M _v)_rc the ratio of the molecular weights of (PEMA) to (PVAc). Improvements to the mechanical properties of the polymers due to blending were considered to be as a result of the presence of favorable and strong (PVAc-PEMA) intermolecular interactions which reveal miscibility and compatibility of the polymers. A lower critical value (M _v)_rc of 4.9 was found, above which no phase separation would be expected on blending these two polymers to the extent of 20% by weight of PEMA.     

Super‐tough biodegradable poly(vinyl alcohol)/poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) blends plasticized by glycerol and sorbitol

Tough biodegradable films were prepared using a poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA)/poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) (PVP) (1:1) blend with plasticizers of glycerol (GLY), sorbitol (SOR), and their (one to one) mixture. We studied the effect of plasticization on the structural, thermal, and mechanical properties of the PVA/PVP blend films. Fourier transform infrared spectra indicated good miscibility of the two components due to the H‐bonding between the PVA and PVP molecules. The addition of plasticizers reduced the interaction between PVA and PVP, evidenced by an increase in the intensity of PVA diffraction peaks observed in the X‐ray diffraction (XRD) characterization. Thermal degradation of the blends increased as a function of the plasticizer used. GLY affected thermal degradation more than SOR and the mixtures. The incorporation of the plasticizers promoted the growth of PVA crystals as evidenced by XRD patterns and the enthalpy of fusion (ΔH_f) obtained by differential scanning calorimetry measurements. The introduction of SOR to the binary blend increased toughness seven times and imparted simultaneous and pronounced improvements to maximum tensile stress and elongation at break. This behavior holds out great promise for the development of a new generation of mechanically robust, yet thoroughly biodegradable materials that could effectively supplant conventional polymers in demanding applications. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2018 , 135, 46406.     

Phase behavior of hydrogen‐bonded ternary polymer blends

Although poly(ethyl methacrylate) (PEMA) and poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) are only slightly different in structure, they are known to be immiscible. Polystyrene is not miscible with PEMA or PMMA. However, when polystyrene is modified to contain certain vinyl phenol groups to become poly(styrene‐co‐vinyl phenol) (PSVPh), it can be miscible with both PEMA and PMMA. What is the miscibility of a ternary blend consisting of PEMA, PMMA, and PSVPh? For this question to be answered, binary blends of PEMA (or PMMA) were first made with PSVPh. Their miscibility was examined. Then, ternary blends composed of PEMA, PMMA, and PSVPh were prepared and measured calorimetrically. The role of PSVPh between PEMA and PMMA and the effect of different contents of vinyl phenol groups on the miscibility of the ternary blends were investigated. On the basis of experimental results, increasing the vinyl phenol contents of PSVPh seemed to have an adverse effect on the miscibility of the ternary blends. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 89: 2088–2094, 2003