Thromboembolism following total hip-replacement arthroplasty. The efficicy of dextran-aspirin and dextran-warfarin in prophylaxis

The efficacy of two antithrombotic regimens, combined dextran and aspirin and combined dextran and warfarin, was analyzed by comparing the incidence of thromboembolism following total hip replacement in two groups of similar patients. Of the 427 who received dextran and aspirin, 7 per cent had thromboembolic complications, including one case of fatal pulmonary embolus and one case of recurrent emboli that required vena caval ligation, and 15 per cent had wound-healing complications. Of the 197 patients who received dextran and warfarin, 5 per cent had thromboembolism and 24 per cent had wound healing complications. Although both prophylactic regimens seemed effective, dextran and aspirin appeared less effective in reducing thromboembolic complications than dextran and warfarin, but there were fewer wound complications in that group. One-fourth of the patients on dextran-warfarin were not adequately anticoagulated despite close supervision. In forty-five patients with a history of thromboembolism who were excluded from the study and analyzed separately, warfarin alone and the two described regimens were equally ineffective in preventing thromboembolism, and the incidence of thromboembolic complications was high. Dextran-aspirin and dextran-warfarin appear to be satisfactory and relatively simple methods of thromboembolic prophylaxis.     

Low molecular weight heparin: a critical analysis of clinical trials

LMWHs are an important new class of antithrombotic agents. They differ from UFH in having relatively more anti-Xa activity, greater bioavailability at low doses, longer half-life, and more predictable anticoagulant response when administered in fixed doses. These properties allow LMWHs to be administered QD or at most BID and without laboratory monitoring. The incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia also appears to be lower with an LMWH than with heparin. Given their favorable pharmacological profile, it was of interest to critically appraise clinical trials of thromboprophylaxis and treatment with these new agents. In orthopedic trials, it was noted that LMWH provided safe and effective thromboprophylaxis for patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery of the lower limb. In those having hip arthroplasty, LMWH was as effective as low-intensity warfarin therapy, but its use was associated with more wound hematomas. In those having total knee arthroplasty, LMWH was more effective than warfarin and did not increase bleeding. However, the prevalence of DVTs complicating this procedure as well as acute hip fracture remains unacceptably high, and additional studies of LMWH in combination with other prophylactic methods, such as external pneumatic compression, are needed. Only one adequately designed trial found less bleeding resulted from LMWH prophylaxis administered at an equivalent antithrombotic dose to UFH. In general medical patients, LMWH appeared to be as effective as UFH and had the advantages of less frequent injections and fewer injection site hematomas. In general surgical patients, there was a lower risk of thromboembolism but a trend toward an increase in bleeding events. Subjects with strokes and spinal cord injuries benefited from fewer thrombotic events, and the latter had fewer bleeding complications. Other potential indications for LMWH, such as cardiopulmonary bypass, hemodialysis, and preservation of graft patency, are presently under study. Perhaps the most impressive benefits of LMWH will be realized when it is used for the treatment of venous thromboembolism. The meta-analysis presented in this review showed a trend toward greater efficacy with LMWH and fewer major bleeding events in comparison with adjusted-dose intravenous UFH. Also, during the months following the thrombotic event, there was significantly less mortality in patients receiving LMWH. A further advantage was the subcutaneous route of administration and lack of requirement for laboratory monitoring. Additional treatment trials are presently in progress and may establish LMWH as the treatment of choice for patients with thromboembolic disorders.     

Low-molecular-weight heparins in the treatment of deep-vein thrombosis

OBJECTIVE: To compare the characteristics and clinical efficacy of low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) and unfractionated heparin (UFH) in the treatment of deep-vein thrombosis (DVT). Adverse effects, dosing, and cost issues are also discussed. DATA SOURCES: A MEDLINE search (January 1984-October 1997) was used to identify pertinent French and English literature, including clinical trials and reviews on LMWHs and their use in DVT. STUDY SELECTION: Trials comparing dalteparin, enoxaparin, tinzaparin, and nadroparin with UFH were selected. As studies were numerous, only randomized trials including more than 50 patients were reviewed. Moreover, all patients studied had a first episode of symptomatic DVT confirmed by objective tests (i.e., venography, duplex ultrasonography, impedance plethysmography). Clinical efficacy and safety of LMWHs were assessed in these trials. DATA EXTRACTION: Results pertaining to venographic assessment, recurrent thromboembolism, total mortality, and bleeding complications were extracted from the selected studies. DATA SYNTHESIS: Compared with UFH, LMWHs have a longer plasma half-life, better subcutaneous bioavailability, more predictable anticoagulant response, and require less intense laboratory monitoring. Most trials demonstrate comparable effects on thrombus extension and incidence of recurrent thromboembolism. Compared with UFH, LMWHs do not alter total mortality. Although animal trials predict a lower hemorrhagic potential for LMWHs, the incidence of bleeding complications is generally similar to that observed with UFH. Outpatient management of DVT with LMWHs has shown comparable safety and efficacy with inpatient UFH use but a shorter hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: Because LMWHs are as safe and as effective as UFH, and because of their more convenient method of administration, they can be considered valuable alternatives for the treatment of DVT. Savings generated by less intensive laboratory monitoring and the possibility of early hospital discharge and outpatient therapy may outweight the higher acquisition cost of LMWHs.     

The prevention of postoperative deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism with low dose subcutaneous heparin and dextran

The standard low dose of heparin for the prevention of deep venous thrombosis in patients who are operated upon is 5,000 units administered subcutaneously two hours before operation and at eight or 12 hourly intervals for the next seven days. Heparin in low doses can at present be recommended as an effective agent in the prevention of deep venous thrombosis in patients over the age of 40 years who are undergoing a major abdominothoracic or gynecologic operation. There is reasonable evidence that heparin in low doses also offers a satisfactory protection against fatal pulmonary embolism for patients at high risk after general abdominothoracic operations. The evidence of the effectiveness of low doses of heparin in the prevention of deep venous thrombosis is less well established in other patients and particularly those at high risk, as after urologic and hip operations. This important distinction is to be made in terms of the population at risk and the efficacy of heparin in low doses. Considering the evidence so far available, it appears that the postoperative state in which dextran has been shown to reduce the incidence of phlebographically confirmed deep venous thrombosis most convincingly is after orthopedic operations. Major orthopedic operations are precisely the type in which the superiority of heparin in low doses is controversial. Unless proved otherwise, dextran 70 in an infusion of 500 to 1,000 milliliters of a 6 per cent solution started before operation and 500 milliliters the following and next three alternate days may be the agent of choice in preventing deep venous thrombosis in major orthopedic operations. Using this scheme, the prophylaxis of postoperative deep venous thrombosis appears equally effective with dextran 70 as with oral anticoagulants. Whether the protection offered by dextran 70 will also prevent fatal and nonfatal pulmonary embolism is still an open question. Low doses of heparin and dextran do not expose patients to serious risks of bleeding after operation, and with the recommended doses of the latter drug, other untoward effects are rare. At the doses recommended, neither of these two drugs requires laboratory monitoring.     

Preventing the cardiotoxic effects of anthracyclines with Cardioxane]

An immune response to heparin, which is clinically manifested by the development of thrombocytopenia with or without thrombosis, is stimulated by a complex of heparin with platelet factor 4 (PF4). The primary thrombotic events in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are more frequently venous than arterial. The development of antibodies, however, does not always result in thrombocytopenia or in catastrophic events. The antibodies, which are of the IgG, IgM, and IgA isotypes, can be easily measured by an ELISA that contains a complex of heparin-platelet factor 4 (PF4). Initial antibody formation can be greatly reduced by limiting the exposure to unfractionated heparin or by the use of low-molecular-weight heparin. For those patients who require anticoagulation and who have antibodies to heparin-PF4, danaparoid (Orgaran), a low-molecular weight heparinoid that does not react with the antibodies, is now commercially available; argatroban, a thrombin-specific inhibitor, can also be obtained for compassionate use. The use of these agents during anticoagulation with warfarin is preferable to the simple discontinuation of heparin and intitiation of warfarin, because the latter treatment can result in ongoing thrombosis.     

Reduced morbidity and mortality rates of the heparin-induced thrombocytopenia syndrome

PURPOSE: We reported a 61% morbidity rate and a 23% mortality rate for the heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) syndrome in 1983. We subsequently reported in 1987 that with early recognition, immediate cessation of the administration of heparin, and platelet function inhibition, the morbidity rate could be reduced to 23% and the mortality rate to 12%. One hundred recent cases of patients with heparin-associated antiplatelet antibodies (HAAb) have been reviewed to determine whether aggressive screening, early diagnosis, and alternate management could further reduce morbidity and mortality rates. METHODS: The consecutive records of 100 patients with positive platelet aggregation tests were reviewed. Sixty-six patients were male. The patients' ages ranged from 23 days to 92 years. The patients were from vascular (28), cardiothoracic (42), and other (30) services. HIT was suspected in patients who received heparin and had falling platelet counts, platelet counts less than 100,000/mm3, or new thromboembolic or hemorrhagic events. RESULTS: Heparin was not offered to six patients with known HAAb. Twelve patients were successfully treated with antiplatelet therapy and limited reexposure to heparin, and 75 patients were successfully treated with early diagnosis and prompt cessation of heparin. Alternate forms of anticoagulation therapy were used selectively. Seven patients had 11 complications. Three of the seven patients were treated successfully with warfarin anticoagulation and aspirin (2) or with aspirin alone (1). A fourth patient was treated with thrombectomy, hematoma evacuation, and aspirin. A fifth patient underwent thrombolysis and coronary angioplasty in addition to receiving warfarin and aspirin. The sixth patient required two thrombectomies and warfarin. A seventh patient required two thrombectomies and aspirin. HIT was responsible for one of 17 deaths. CONCLUSION: A 7.4% morbidity rate and a 1.1% mortality rate have been achieved in patients with HAAb by aggressive screening, early recognition of HIT, and prompt cessation of the administration of heparin. Platelet function inhibitors and other anticoagulants, including nonreacting low molecular weight heparin, are important adjuncts in the management of the thromboembolic disorders associated with HIT.     

Transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation: a therapy that promises help in chronic pain

An 84-year-old patient with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), global cardiac decompensation, and acute renal failure underwent a cardiosurgical intervention using an extracorporeal circuit. For systemic anticoagulation danaparoid (Orgaran) was applied as a heparin substitute preoperatively and maintained for systemic anticoagulation during ECC despite it being eliminated by the kidney. The postoperative recovery was prolonged due to bleeding complications. During cardiopulmonary bypass (216 min) the target level of anti-factor Xa was 1.5 UI/ml. This required continuous infusion and an occasional bolus of danaparoid. Coagulation in the extracorporeal circuit was observed twice at plasma levels below 1.4 IU/ml. There were no thromboembolic or neurologic events. We did not retransfuse blood from the extracorporeal circuit or the cardiotomy reservoir after bypass, but because elimination of danaparoid was impaired in this patient and there is no neutraliser available antifactor Xa postoperatively exceeded 0.6 IU/ml for 30 hours. Diffuse bleeding with tamponade resulted. Weaning the patient from the respirator was achieved 12 hours after the last re-exploration. From the 4th postoperative day 750 IU of danaparoid were administered twice daily subcutaneously for thrombosis prevention. On the 6th postoperative day discharge from the ICU was possible. We conclude that the application of danaparoid for cardiopulmonary bypass in patients suffering from acute renal failure may be complicated by hemorrhage.     

A comparison of danaparoid and warfarin for prophylaxis against deep vein thrombosis after total hip replacement: The Danaparoid Hip Arthroplasty Investigators Group

Orgaran (danaparoid sodium injection) is a novel antithrombotic agent. Early studies suggest that this compound may be beneficial in preventing deep vein thrombosis in predisposed patients. This multicenter, randomized, assessor blinded, clinical trial compared subcutaneous danaparoid with warfarin for the prevention of deep vein thrombosis in patients undergoing hip replacement surgery. Bilateral venography was used to detect thrombi. Patients also underwent follow-up examinations 1, 2, and 3 months after discontinuation of the study to determine the after effects of treatment. Nearly 27% of patients who received warfarin and 14.6% of patients who received danaparoid developed deep vein thrombosis, a risk reduction of 46%. The absolute difference in the incidence of deep vein thrombosis was 12.3% in favor of danaparoid. The incidence of venographically documented proximal deep vein thrombosis was 1.5% for danaparoid and 4.1% for warfarin. These results demonstrate that danaparoid is more effective than warfarin in preventing deep vein thrombosis following hip replacement surgery. The preoperative administration of danaparoid does not increase surgical blood loss compared with warfarin.     

A fatal low-molecular-weight heparin-associated thrombocytopenia after hip surgery: possible usefulness of PF4-heparin ELISA test

In 37 patients undergoing total hip replacement, a prophylactic treatment by a low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) was conducted for 2 weeks. They belonged to a group of 499 patients included in a multicenter clinically controlled trial comparing two LMWHs. Blood was collected 1 day before surgery (D-1) and at D+1 or D+2 and D+5 or D+6 as well as D+10 through D+14 after surgery for determinations of platelets counts and anti-Xa. Bilateral venography was performed between D+10 and D+14. A fatal heparin-associated-thrombocytopenia (HAT) occurred on D+9 in one patient and was associated with a positive platelet aggregation test. This finding was confirmed with a recent ELISA test which evidenced a high concentration of PF4-heparin dependent antibodies 72 h before the detection of thrombocytopenia. This led us to study retrospectively PF4-heparin ELISA results by testing the plasma samples of 36 other surgical patients treated under the same conditions and during the same period (four measurements per patient). Among these patients, seven had a venous thrombotic event as a treatment failure. Although some authors claimed that some post-operative thromboses may be facilitated by the presence of heparin-dependent antibodies associated with or without thrombocytopenia, no thrombocytopenia and no positive PF4-heparin ELISA test was observed in this group. Out of the 144 tests performed in these 36 patients for the detection of PF4-heparin complexes dependent antibodies, 15 results were borderline in ten patients and three results in two patients were positive. No relation was evidenced between a positive ELISA test and the occurrence of venous thrombosis. This study points out the possible usefulness of the PF4-heparin ELISA test for HAT-antibodies detection. A daily platelet count in a postoperative patient under heparin therapy, showing thrombocytopenia associated with the detection of heparin-dependent antibodies could allow an earlier and more reliable diagnosis of HAT.     

Venous thromboembolism in multiple trauma patients

Thromboembolic complications are frequent in patients with multiple trauma. The efficacy of unfractionated heparin for venous thrombosis prophylaxis has not been established. Based on limited prospective data, low-molecular-weight heparin appears to be more effective than unfractionated heparin and at least as effective as compression devices for preventing thromboembolic complications in these patients. Vena cava filters should be considered in high-risk patients who cannot receive anticoagulant therapy, but long-term filter use without concomitant anticoagulant therapy is associated with a substantial risk of recurrent thromboembolism.     

The influence of cytomegalovirus on the natural history of HIV infection: evidence of rapid course of HIV infection in HIV-positive patients infected with cytomegalovirus

PROBLEM: A life-threatening complication of the thrombembolism prophylaxis with heparin is heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) type II. HIT type II is based on immunological mechanisms. Even low, subcutaneously applied doses may produce HIT type II. In those patients, continued application may cause thromboembolic complications. The most important symptom of HIT type II is a decrease of platelets. METHODS: In a prospective study, we investigated the incidence of HIT type II within the period from 01.07.95 to 30.06.96 in orthopedic patients. We also evaluated the importance of the daily platelet count from the fifth postoperative day for the early diagnosis of HIT type II and a possible reduction of the thrombosis rate. The study included 307 patients after primary implantation of hip and knee endoprosthesis and after hip endoprosthesis replacement. All patients received 3 x 5000 IU/d of unfractionated heparin subcutaneously. Whenever there was a decrease of platelets of at least 50% in relation to the preoperative value or whenever thrombembolic complications occurred, serum was analyzed by the heparin-induced platelet activation test (HIPA). RESULTS: 20 patients developed HIT type II. This corresponds to an incidence of 6.5%. 10 of the HIT type II antibody positive patients (50%) developed thrombembolic complications. 3 patients (0.9%) of the group studied developed clinically symptomatic thrombembolic complications without evidence of heparin antibodies. The total risk of getting thrombembolic complications was 4.2% (13 patients). 3.3% (10 patients) of the entire group developed HIT type II antibody associated thrombembolic complications; 1 patient died. The lethality in the HIT type II antibody positive patient group amounted to 5%. The patients with HIT type II received LMW heparinoid Orgaran (AKZO-Organon, The Netherlands) or hirudin (as a clinical trial). The comparison group (retrospective study from 17.10.92 to 16.10.93) was composed of 262 patients with the same operations and equal thromboembolism prophylaxis. The platelet count was made only as part of routine diagnostic tests. 21 patients (8.0%) developed clinically symptomatic thrombembolic complications. The difference in the thrombosis rate between these two groups of patients is statistically significant. Unrecognized HIT type II is probably the reason for the high thrombembolic complication rate in the comparison group. CONCLUSIONS: The daily platelet count from the fifth postoperative day and from the first day in case of reexposure to heparin is an important measure for the early diagnosis of HIT type II.     

A clinical evaluation of aspirin prophylaxis of thromboembolic disease after total hip arthroplasty

Prophylaxis of thromboembolic disease using aspirin was studied prospectively in 340 patients undergoing total hip replacement, excluding those with prior thromboembolic disease. Clinical criteria were used to diagnose thrombophlebitis, while clinical criteria, roentgenography, blood-gas determinations, electrocardiography, and pulmonary vascular scanning were used to diagnose pulmonary emboli. Five patients had signs of symptoms of pulmonary emboli, all confirmed by pulmonary vascular scan. No fatal pulmonary emboli occurred. Twenty-six patients had thrombophlebitis. Without simultaneous control group, a reduction in postoperative thromboembolic disease in these patients receiving aspirin was not proved. However, the observed low incidence of clinically evident thromboembolic manifestations suggests that aspirin may be a simple and useful prophylactic agent in these patients.     

Cost effectiveness of low-molecular weight heparin versus warfarin following hip replacement surgery

Little information is available on the efficacy of low-molecular-weight heparin (enoxaparin) versus warfarin for treatment of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism following hip replacement surgery. Still less is known of the comparative cost effectiveness of these two therapies. A retrospective study was done on 56 patients who underwent elective hip surgery at an urban medical center between 1991 and 1996. All patients received enoxaparin or warfarin for purposes of thromboprophylaxis. An analysis of medication cost, therapy, laboratory monitoring, and bleeding events of the two antithrombolytic agents was undertaken. Total savings with enoxaparin averaged $1253 per patient, or $137,886 over the study period. The incidence of deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism was 0% with enoxaparin and 3% with warfarin. These data indicate that enoxaparin is a more cost-effective and efficacious regimen for thromboprophylaxis following hip replacement surgery than warfarin.     

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with thrombotic complications during prophylactic treatment with low-molecular-weight heparin

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is very uncommon with low-molecular-weight heparin, especially when given for prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism. In two of the four published cases, with thrombotic complications, thrombocytopenia may have been related to cross-reactivity between unfractionated heparin and low-molecular-weight heparin. We report one patient who received low-molecular-weight heparin for prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism without any previous injection of unfractionated heparin, and experienced thrombocytopenia with thrombotic complications. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia was confirmed by several laboratory assays. This observation emphasizes the need for platelet count monitoring during low-molecular-weight heparin therapy.     

Prevention of deep-vein thrombosis after total hip arthroplasty. Comparison of warfarin and dalteparin

The effectiveness and safety of warfarin were compared with those of a low-molecular-weight heparin (dalteparin) for the prevention of deep-vein thrombosis after total hip arthroplasty in a prospective, randomized, multi-institutional trial. Patients who were older than eighteen years of age and were scheduled to have an elective primary or revision total hip arthroplasty were eligible; 580 patients were randomized, 550 had the operation and received prophylaxis, and 382 had evaluable venograms. Prophylaxis was provided either with warfarin beginning the night before the operation or with dalteparin beginning two hours before the operation and was continued until venography was performed. Bleeding was assessed on the basis of intraoperative blood loss, transfusion requirements, a decrease in hematocrit, and clinically identified bleeding complications. The prevalence of deep-vein thrombosis was found to be significantly lower in the patients who had received dalteparin than in those who had received warfarin (twenty-eight [15 per cent] of 192 patients compared with forty-nine [26 per cent] of 190 patients; p = 0.006). Deep-vein thrombosis occurred in the calf veins of twenty-one patients (11 per cent) who had received dalteparin and of forty-three patients (23 per cent) who had received warfarin; this difference was significant (p = 0.003). Proximal deep-vein thrombosis occurred in ten patients (5 per cent) who had received dalteparin and in sixteen patients (8 per cent) who had received warfarin; however, with the numbers available, no significant difference could be detected (p = 0.185). We also could not detect a significant difference with regard to the intraoperative and postoperative blood loss, the decrease in hematocrit, and the prevalence of major bleeding complications between the two groups; however, the patients who had received dalteparin had a significantly higher prevalence of bleeding complications involving the operative site (p = 0.03), and a significantly greater percentage required postoperative transfusions (p = 0.001). We concluded that preoperative prophylaxis with dalteparin is significantly more effective than that with warfarin in preventing deep-vein thrombosis after total hip arthroplasty. The greater effectiveness of dalteparin must be considered, however, in light of an increased need for postoperative transfusions and an increase in the prevalence of wound-related bleeding complications.     

Preventive treatment in internal medicine by low-molecular-weight heparin (nadroparine calcium)

On the basis of literature data the authors discuss the preventive treatment of the low-molecular-weight heparin in various non-surgical disorders. The method was compared with unfractionated heparin in the treatment of 20 high risk patients. The efficacy of the two different heparins was examined on the liver and renal function, blood lipids and the hematologic and hemostaseologic parameters. The thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications were observed. Significant difference was not found with the comparison of the two preparations. The authors emphasize the simplicity, safety, home treatment possibility of the low-molecular-weight heparin and the regular control of thrombocyte-count only, too.     

Cardiopulmonary bypass with danaparoid sodium and ancrod in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Heparin is the standard anticoagulant for patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. There are some patients for whom heparin is unsuitable and ancrod (a defibrinogenating enzyme) has been used as an alternative. We present a patient with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in whom treatment ancrod was ineffective. The addition of danaparoid sodium (a heparinoid) allowed safe cardiopulmonary bypass. We discuss the reasons for this and suggest that the combination of ancrod and danaparoid sodium is a logical one in such cases.     

Adverse interactions between warfarin and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs: mechanisms, clinical significance, and avoidance

OBJECTIVE: To review the mechanisms and clinical significance of adverse interactions between warfarin and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and discuss how these interactions can be avoided. DATA SOURCES: Previous studies of interactions between warfarin and NSAIDs or reports of adverse interactions were identified from a MEDLINE search (1976 to present) and from the reference lists of pertinent articles. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: All articles were considered for inclusion in the review. Pertinent information was selected for discussion. DATA SYNTHESIS: All NSAIDs can prolong bleeding time by inhibiting platelet function. High-dose aspirin has a direct hypoprothrombinemic effect. Phenylbutazone and its analogs enhance the hypoprothrombinemic effect of warfarin through a pharmacokinetic interaction by inhibiting the hepatic metabolism of warfarin. Mefenamic acid also enhances the anticoagulant effect of warfarin, but the mechanism is not known. The clinical relevance of protein binding displacement in the interaction between warfarin and NSAIDs has been overstated, although a significant one may be more likely in the presence of high concentrations of NSAIDs in patients with slow elimination of warfarin (e.g., those with severe heart failure or impaired liver function). NSAIDs can induce gastrointestinal bleeding, which is likely to be more severe if warfarin is also given. CONCLUSIONS: The combined use of warfarin and NSAIDs is generally discouraged because of the increased risk of bleeding in these patients. In patients receiving warfarin who also require NSAIDs, phenylbutazone and its analogs, high-dose aspirin, mefenamic acid, excessive use of topical methyl salicylate, and NSAIDs that are associated with a higher risk of bleeding peptic ulcers should be avoided. Patients should be closely monitored for anticoagulant control and bleeding complications during the combined use of warfarin and NSAIDs.     

Fixed minidose warfarin and aspirin alone and in combination vs adjusted-dose warfarin for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: Second Copenhagen Atrial Fibrillation, Aspirin, and Anticoagulation Study

BACKGROUND: Despite the efficacy of warfarin sodium therapy for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation, many physicians hesitate to prescribe it to elderly patients because of the risk for bleeding complications and because of inconvenience for the patients. METHODS: The Second Copenhagen Atrial Fibrillation, Aspirin, and Anticoagulation Study was a randomized, controlled trial examining the following therapies: warfarin sodium, 1.25 mg/d; warfarin sodium, 1.25 mg/d, plus aspirin, 300 mg/d; and aspirin, 300 mg/d. These were compared with adjusted-dose warfarin therapy (international normalized ratio of prothrombin time [INR], 2.0-3.0). Stroke or a systemic thromboembolic event was the primary outcome event. Transient ischemic attack, acute myocardial infarction, and death were secondary events. Data were handled as survival data, and risk factors were identified using the Cox proportional hazards model. The trial was scheduled for 6 years from May 1, 1993, but due to scientific evidence of inefficiency of low-intensity warfarin plus aspirin therapy from another study, our trial was prematurely terminated on October 2, 1996. RESULTS: We included 677 patients (median age, 74 years). The cumulative primary event rate after 1 year was 5.8% in patients receiving minidose warfarin; 7.2%, warfarin plus aspirin; 3.6%, aspirin; and 2.8%, adjusted-dose warfarin (P = .67). After 3 years, no difference among the groups was seen. Major bleeding events were rare. CONCLUSIONS: Although the difference was insignificant, adjusted-dose warfarin seemed superior to minidose warfarin and to warfarin plus aspirin after 1 year of treatment. The results do not justify a change in the current recommendation of adjusted-dose warfarin (INR, 2.0-3.0) for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation.