Randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open mesh repair for inguinal hernia: outcome and cost

OBJECTIVE: To compare tension-free open mesh hernioplasty under local anaesthetic with transabdominal preperitoneal laparoscopic hernia repair under general anaesthetic. DESIGN: A randomised controlled trial of 403 patients with inguinal hernias. SETTING: Two acute general hospitals in London between May 1995 and December 1996. SUBJECTS: 400 patients with a diagnosis of groin hernia, 200 in each group. Main outcome measures: Time until discharge, postoperative pain, and complications; patients' perceived health (SF-36), duration of convalescence, and patients' satisfaction with surgery; and health service costs. RESULTS: More patients in the open group (96%) than in the laparoscopic group (89%) were discharged on the same day as the operation (chi2 = 6.7; 1 df; P=0.01). Although pain scores were lower in the open group while the effect of the local anaesthetic persisted (proportional odds ratio at 2 hours 3.5 (2.3 to 5.1)), scores after open repair were significantly higher for each day of the first week (0.5 (0.3 to 0.7) on day 7) and during the second week (0.7 (0.5 to 0.9)). At 1 month there was a greater improvement (or less deterioration) in mean SF-36 scores over baseline in the laparoscopic group compared with the open group on seven of eight dimensions, reaching significance on five. For every activity considered the median time until return to normal was significantly shorter for the laparoscopic group. Patients randomised to laparoscopic repair were more satisfied with surgery at 1 month and 3 months after surgery. The mean cost per patient of laparoscopic repair was 335 pounds (95% confidence interval 228 pounds to 441 pounds) more than the cost of open repair. CONCLUSION: This study confirms that laparoscopic hernia repair has considerable short term clinical advantages after discharge compared with open mesh hernioplasty, although it was more expensive.     

The medical demands of the special athlete

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Before choosing between open and laparoscopic preperitoneal tension-free repair, a study comparing their safety and short-term outcome was needed. No randomised studies comparing the two hernia repair techniques have hitherto been published. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective randomised study was carried out comparing laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal mesh herniorrhaphy (n = 24) to open preperitoneal mesh herniorrhaphy (n = 25). RESULTS: When comparing unilateral repairs, the mean operation time was significantly (P < 0.01) shorter in the open group (55 min) than in the laparoscopic group (66 min). Pain on movement (P < 0.05) and pain on coughing (P < 0.01) receded more rapidly in the laparoscopic group. The median time before return to work or normal activity was 7 days (range 1-60) in laparoscopic and 5 days (1-30) in open repair. There were five (21%) complications associated with the laparoscopic procedure, while the open procedure resulted in two (8%) complications. After a median follow-up of 18 months the recurrence rate in the laparoscopic group was 13% and in the open group 8%. CONCLUSIONS: In this study the open method was associated with fewer complications and recurrences than the laparoscopic technique. Despite the decreased postoperative discomfort after laparoscopic repair, there was no significant difference in median time before return to work or normal activity. These results together with the higher cost of the laparoscopic procedure suggest that the open method is more suitable at least for unilateral hernias.     

Caudal clonidine and bupivacaine for combined epidural and general anaesthesia in children

BACKGROUND: Clonidine produces analgesia by actions on alpha 2-adrenoceptors and enhances both sensory and motor blockade from epidural injection of local anaesthetics. Low-dose clonidine has been used so far for caudal injection in children. Our aim was to study the perioperative effects of high-dose caudal clonidine when added to low concentration of bupivacaine for combined epidural and general anaesthesia in children. METHODS: After induction of general anaesthesia caudal block was performed either with 1 ml.kg-1 bupivacaine 0.175% with the addition of clonidine 5 micrograms.kg-1 (n = 20), or with 1 ml.kg-1 bupivacaine 0.175% (n = 20). The intraoperative anaesthetic requirements, the perioperative haemodynamic effects, respiratory rate, sedation score, postoperative pain scores and side effects were assessed by a blinded observer. A patient-controlled analgesia system was used for postoperative pain relief. The quality of postoperative pain relief was assessed using Smiley's pain analogue scale. RESULTS: Intraoperative haemodynamic responses did not differ between the groups. However, during emergence from general anaesthesia children in the clonidine group had significantly lower heart rates and blood pressure compared to children in the control group. In addition, heart rates and blood pressures were also lower in the clonidine group in the early postoperative period (P < 0.05). Postoperative analgesia was significantly better in the clonidine group as evidenced by the total number of requests (3 vs 12, P < 0.05) and the total amount of tramadol (20.5 mg vs 72.8 mg, P < 0.05) administered. The duration of the caudal analgesia was significantly longer in the clonidine group (20.9 +/- 7.4 h vs 14.4 +/- 10.9 h, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that caudal clonidine 5 micrograms.kg-1 enhances and prolongs caudal blockade with bupivacaine (1.175% in children. It also blocks sympathoadrenergic responses during emergence from anaesthesia. Sedation and cardiovascular effects are observed up to 3 h into the postoperative period.     

Laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy: the new gold standard of hernia repair?

The surgical treatment of the common inguinal hernia has been one of the most analyzed and debated topics in medicine. Recently, with the success of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, interest in minimally invasive surgical techniques has led to it's application for inguinal hernia repair. Current laparoscopic herniorrhaphies are based on the principles of conventional open preperitoneal repairs and are classified into two types: 1) transabdominal preperitoneal repair (TAPP) and 2) totally extraperitoneal repair (TEP). Common advantages to both techniques include a decrease in postoperative pain, earlier return to normal activity, and improved cosmesis. Both laparoscopic techniques have the disadvantage of requiring general or regional anesthesia and increased procedural costs. Lastly, there is a concern that laparoscopic hernia repair has not been around long enough to know the risk of late recurrences. Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy, however, is a viable alternative to standard open inguinal hernia repair.     

The clinical characteristics of intraoral herpes simplex virus infection in 52 immunocompetent patients

OBJECTIVES: To determine if nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs provide adequate pain control for patients having laparoscopic hernia repair and to compare the effectiveness of ketorolac tromethamine with ibuprofen in reducing postoperative laparoscopic hernia pain. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective double-blind randomized study at a 100-bed community hospital. PATIENTS: Seventy patients ranging in age from 16 to 83 years scheduled for elective laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. INTERVENTIONS: Patients undergoing laparoscopic hernia repair were enrolled in a double-blind randomized study to compare the 2 treatments. Group 1 received a placebo capsule 1 hour before surgery and ketorolac tromethamine, 60 mg intravenously, at the time of trocar insertion. Group 2 received ibuprofen, 800 mg an hour before surgery, and isotonic sodium chloride solution, 2 mL intravenously, at the time of trocar insertion. In addition, all patients received local infiltration of 30 mL of bupivacaine hydrochloride into their trocar sites. All patients were discharged within 5 hours of the operation and were instructed to take 400 mg of ibuprofen orally every 4 hours for 24 hours whether or not they were experiencing pain. A 24-hour supply of ibuprofen was provided to all study patients. Pain was assessed using the Visual Analog Pain Scale with a maximum pain rating of 100. Assessments were done at the time of and 18 hours after discharge. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Postoperative pain 18 and 24 hours after discharge was assessed using a standardized questionnaire in a telephone interview by a registered nurse from the Outpatient Surgical Unit. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the level of pain experienced by 35 patients who received ketorolac intravenously and 35 who received ibuprofen orally. There was no significant difference between the 2 treatment groups in the amount of pain experienced at discharge and 18 hours after discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Pain relief from ibuprofen, 800 mg, administered orally an hour before laparoscopic hernia repair was not statistically different from that obtained with intravenous ketorolac, 60 mg, administered intraoperatively when comparing the hospital discharge pain score and the mean and highest pain scores 18 hours after discharge. Ibuprofen offers equivalent pain control at a lower cost and reduced potential for adverse drug events compared with intravenous ketorolac in patients having laparoscopic hernia repair. No patient required narcotic supplementation, and pain control was judged satisfactory by all the patients.     

Day-case laparoscopic hernia repair

Some 114 patients (median age 52 years) underwent laparoscopic hernia repair as a day-case procedure. Twenty-one patients had bilateral and 11 recurrent hernias. Some 113 patients underwent transabdominal preperitoneal mesh repair but one required conversion to open operation. Mean operating time was 24 min for unilateral and 38 min for bilateral repair. In an operating session of 3.5 h, up to five patients (mean 4.4) underwent surgery and as many as seven hernias were repaired. More than 10 per cent of patients were found to have a previously undiagnosed hernia on the opposite side. A total of 111 patients were discharged home on the day of surgery. Major complications included one omental bleed and one small bowel obstruction. Seroma was the commonest minor complication and occurred in 7 per cent of patients. More than 35 per cent of patients needed no postoperative analgesia. To date there has been one recurrence (follow-up range 2-18 months).     

A randomized, controlled, clinical study of laparoscopic vs open tension-free inguinal hernia repair

BACKGROUND: The aim of this prospective, randomized, controlled clinical study was to compare laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernia repair with a standard tension-free open mesh repair (open). METHODS: A total of 108 low-risk patients with unilateral (primary or recurrent) or bilateral hernias were randomized to TAPP (group 1 = 52 cases) or open (group 2 = 56 cases). The outcome measures included operating time, complications, postoperative pain, return to normal activity, operating theater costs, and recurrences. RESULTS: The mean operative time was longer for the TAPP than for the open group only in unilateral primary hernias. At rest, the median Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score was higher for group 1 than group 2 at 48 h postoperatively. Mild to discomforting pain in the inguinal region after 7 days, night pain after 30 days, and inguinal hardening after 3 months were more frequent in group 2 than group 1. No significant differences were observed in return to normal activities between the groups. One hernia recurrence was observed after 1 month in group 1. TAPP was significantly more expensive than open. CONCLUSIONS: TAPP was associated with less postoperative pain than open. The increase in operating theater costs, however, was dramatic and was not compensated by shorter time away from work. TAPP should not be adopted routinely unless its costs can be drastically reduced.     

Postoperative patient-controlled epidural analgesia with opioid bupivacaine mixtures

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy and safety of patient-controlled epidural analgesia of morphine or fentanyl in combination with bupivacaine for postoperative pain relief. METHODS: Forty ASA I-II patients scheduled for major abdominal surgery were studied. After insertion of a lumbar epidural catheter, patients were given a non-opioid general anaesthetic. After surgery patients complaining of pain, received a loading dose of 2 mg morphine (Group I) or 50 micrograms fentanyl (Group II). For continuing pain, 1 mg morphine in 4 ml bupivacaine 0.125% (0.25 mg.ml-1 morphine and 1 mg.ml-1 bupivacaine, Group I) or 20 micrograms fentanyl in 4 ml bupivacaine 0.125% (5 micrograms.ml-1 fentanyl and 1 mg.ml-1 bupivacaine Group II) were administered. Blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate and SpO2 were monitored. Assessments of pain (VAS), nausea-vomiting, motor block, pruritus and sedation were recorded for 24 hr. RESULTS: No difference in pain or sedation was observed between groups. The 24 hr postoperative opioid consumption was 15.50 +/- 7.53 mg morphine and 555.10 +/- 183.85 micrograms fentanyl. Total bupivacaine 0.125% consumption was 58.00 +/- 30.14 ml in Group I and 101.05 +/- 36.77 ml in Group II. One patient in Group II complained of motor weakness in one leg. The incidence of nausea (Group I 45%, Group II 10% P < 0.05) and pruritus (Group I 30%, Group II 5% P < 0.05) was less in patients receiving fentanyl. CONCLUSION: Both methods were effective in the prevention of pain but, because of fewer side effects, fentanyl may be preferable to morphine.     

Prospective study of the incidence of transient radicular irritation in patients undergoing spinal anesthesia

BACKGROUND: There is considerable controversy regarding the role of subarachnoid 5% hyperbaric lidocaine in the syndrome transient radicular irritation (TRI). This randomized, double-blinded, prospective study was designed to determine the incidence of TRI and identify factors possibly contributing to its development. METHODS: One hundred fifty-nine ASA physical status 1 or 2 patients undergoing outpatient knee arthroscopy or unilateral inguinal hernia repair were prospectively randomized to receive spinal anesthesia with 5% hyperbaric lidocaine with epinephrine (60 mg with 0.2 mg epinephrine for arthroscopy or 75 mg with 0.2 mg epinephrine for hernia repair), 2% isobaric lidocaine without epinephrine (60 mg for arthroscopy or 75 mg for hernia repair), or 0.75% hyperbaric bupivacaine without epinephrine (7.5 mg for arthroscopy or 9.0 mg for hernia repair) in a double-blinded fashion. On the 3rd postoperative day, patients were contacted by a blinded investigator and questioned regarding the incidence of postoperative complications including TRI, defined as back pain with radiation down one or both buttocks or legs occurring within 24 h after surgery. Postoperatively, time from injection to block resolution, ambulation, voiding, and ready for discharge were recorded by a postanesthesia care unit nurse blinded to the group assignment. RESULTS: The incidence of TRI was greater in patients receiving lidocaine than in those receiving bupivacaine (16% vs. 0%; P = 0.003). There was no difference in the incidence of TRI between the patients receiving 5% hyperbaric lidocaine with epinephrine and those receiving 2% isobaric lidocaine without epinephrine (16% vs. 16%; P = 0.98). The incidence of TRI was greater in patients undergoing arthroscopy than in those undergoing hernia repair (13% vs. 5%; P = 0.04). There was no difference in discharge times in patients receiving bupivacaine versus those receiving hyperbaric lidocaine with epinephrine (292 vs. 322 min; P = 0.61). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of TRI is greater with lidocaine than bupivacaine, decreasing the lidocaine concentration to 2% does not prevent TRI, and surgical position may be an important contributing factor. Discharge times at our institution are not different when equipotent doses of 0.75% hyperbaric bupivacaine or 5% hyperbaric lidocaine with 0.2 mg epinephrine are used in ambulatory patients undergoing spinal anesthesia.     

Controlled multicenter trial of laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty vs Shouldice herniorrhaphy. Early results

BACKGROUND: In February 1993 a prospective randomized multicenter trial was initiated to compare laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty to Shouldice herniorrhaphy as performed by surgeons of nonspecialized clinics. METHODS: Until January 1994, 87 patients with 108 hernias took part in the trial (43 Shouldice and 44 laparoscopic repairs). RESULTS: The laparoscopic procedure took significantly longer than did the open operation but caused less pain as measured by pain analogue score and consumption of paracetamol and narcotics. The postoperative complication rate was 26% in the open and 16% in the laparoscopic group. The patients in the laparoscopic group were discharged earlier and their convalescence was shorter than after open hernia repair. There has been one early recurrence in the laparoscopic and two in the open group to date with a mean follow-up of 201 days. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic hernia repair causes less pain than the conventional operation and enables the patient to return to full work and usual activities earlier. The recurrence rate will not be known for 5 years.     

Comparison between extradural infusion of ropivacaine or bupivacaine for the prevention of postoperative pain after total knee arthroplasty

We have compared the analgesia and motor block produced by extradural infusions of ropivacaine and bupivacaine after total knee arthroplasty. Fifty-two patients received 8 ml h1 of either 0.2% ropivacaine or 0.2% bupivacaine by extradural infusion for 24 h after operation. Analgesia was assessed by postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) and morphine consumption. At rest these were low in both groups; median VAS was 0-13.3 mm for the ropivacaine group and 0-0.5 mm for the bupivacaine group. Over the 24 h of the infusion, the estimated (ropivacaine bupivacaine) difference in wound pain at rest was 5.6 mm (P = 0.017) and on passive movement 11.6 mm (P = 0.016). Median morphine consumption was 30.7 mg in the ropivacaine group and 20.5 mg in the bupivacaine group. In the ropivacaine group, 50% of patients compared with 19% in the bupivacaine group had no motor block 2 h after operation, increasing to 88% for ropivacaine and 56% for bupivacaine by 24 h. Bupivacaine produced significantly more frequent and intense motor block over the 24 h (P = 0.015).     

Posterior approaches in groin hernia repair with prosthesis: open or closed

Laparoscopic herniorraphies have been used to reduce the pain and convalescence associated with open approaches. However, there is still not any consensus of the best approach. We compared open preperitoneal and laparoscopic total extraperitoneal approaches in groin hernia repair. METHODS: Thirty-two patients underwent open preperitoneal herniorraphy (Group I) and other 32 patients underwent total extraperitoneal repair (Group II). Time of surgery was noted. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was applied to evaluate the postoperative pain intensity. RESULTS: Operation time was 35 (20-65) minutes in Group I and 58 (40-85) minutes in Group II (p < 0.05). The difference of complication ratios between two groups was not significant. Laparoscopic approach was associated with less pain within postoperative 24 hours as compared to the open technique. However, after the first postoperative day, there was no longer statistically significant difference between both groups. No recurrence has yet been seen in follow-up period of 15 (4-24) months. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic herniorraphy is associated with better results in term of postoperative pain within the first 24 hours as compared to open technique.     

Analgesia following appendicectomy--the value of peritoneal bupivacaine

PURPOSE: Peritoneal inflammation is an important feature in many patients presenting with appendicitis. The contribution of peritoneal nerve fibres to pain experienced after appendicectomy has received little attention. METHOD: In this prospective double blind randomized study a consecutive series of 60 patients undergoing appendicectomy for suspected appendicitis were enrolled. A dose of 1.5 mg.kg-1 bupivacaine 0.5% was used. Group one patients received the entire dose of bupivacaine subcutaneously. Group two patients received half the dose subcutaneously (s.c.) and half the dose to the peritoneum. Pain scores were assessed pre-operatively and at 30 min, 12 and 24 hr post-operatively using a visual analogue scale. Time to first analgesia and total analgesia requirements in the first 24 hr were recorded. RESULTS: The patients receiving the s.c. combined with peritoneal bupivacaine had a lower pain score 30 min post-operatively (32 +/- 2 vs 54 +/- 4; P < 0.0001), a longer time to first analgesia (248 +/- 20 vs 164 +/- 17 min; P = 0.002) as well as lower opioid (68 +/- 5 vs 100 +/- 7 mg; P = 0.0002) and non steroidal analgesic requirements (65 +/- 6 vs 96 +/- 6 mg; P = 0.007) in the first 24 hr post-operatively. CONCLUSION: A combination of s.c. and peritoneal infiltration with bupivacaine is superior to skin infiltration alone in the relief of pain post appendicectomy.     

Late mesh rejection as a complication to transabdominal preperitoneal laparoscopic hernia repair

BACKGROUND: The use of a mesh in transabdominal preperitoneal laparoscopic hernia repair (TAPP) caries the risk of late rejection or infectious complications related to the mesh. The aim of this study was to describe the extent of these complications. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 500 consecutive patients with TAPP for inguinal hernia. Results: Late mesh rejection was observed in three patients at 5-19 months after surgery. The mesh was removed via a suprapubic midline incision. At 3-4 month's follow-up, none of the patients had recurrence of the hernia, even though no hernia repair had been done. CONCLUSION: Late mesh rejection is a potential complication of TAPP and has to be considered when choosing the surgical method of hernia repair.     

Comparison of caudal block using bupivacaine and ketamine with ilioinguinal nerve block for orchidopexy in children

Forty boys weighing less than 25 kg undergoing unilateral orchidopexy were randomly allocated to receive one of two analgesic regimens. Group C received a caudal epidural block with 0.25% bupivacaine 1 ml.kg-1 and preservative-free ketamine 0.5 mg.kg-1; Group L received an ilioinguinal nerve block with 0.25% bupivacaine 0.5 ml.kg-1 and infiltration of the wound with 0.25% bupivacaine 0.5 ml.kg-1. All subjects received diclofenac sodium 1-2 mg.kg-1 as a rectal suppository. Postoperative pain was assessed by means of a modified Objective Pain Score and analgesia was administered if this exceeded a value of 4. The median duration of analgesia was 10 h (range 2.6 to > 24 h) in Group C and 2.9 h (range 0.7 to > 24 h) in Group L (p < 0.05). There were no differences between groups in the incidence of motor block, urinary retention, postoperative vomiting or postoperative sedation. Subjects in Group L required significantly more doses of postoperative analgesia than those in Group C (p < 0.05).     

Risk of myocardial infarction, angina and stroke in users of oral contraceptives: an updated analysis of a cohort study

BACKGROUND: Ropivacaine has shown less systemic toxicity than bupivacaine, and comparatively low muscle-blocking properties could constitute another advantage when used epidurally for obstetric pain relief. We aimed primarily to compare maternal and foetal drug disposition following continuous epidural infusion of ropivacaine or bupivacaine. METHODS: Twenty-four full-term, nulliparous women were randomized to continuous epidural infusion (10 ml/h) of ropivacaine 2.5 mg/ml or bupivacaine 2.5 mg/ml for labour pain relief in a double-blind, parallel-group design. Maternal blood samples were collected up to 24 h after the end of infusion as well as taken from the umbilical cord at the time of delivery. Sensory and motor block as well as analgesia were assessed. All the women were monitored by cardiotocography and neonatal assessment was performed. RESULTS: The sensory block was adequate for both drugs. Higher plasma levels (total and free) were seen with ropivacaine, although the infusion with bupivacaine continued on average for about 2 hours longer. However, the ratios between maternal and umbilical blood concentrations were similar for both drugs. Normal neonatal Apgar and neonatal adaptive capacity scores (NACS) were found in both groups. CONCLUSION: A continuous epidural infusion of 25 mg/h ropivacaine or bupivacaine both produced good labour pain relief. Higher total and free plasma concentrations were seen for ropivacaine. The ratios between maternal and umbilical plasma levels were similar for both drugs.     

Prospective randomized study of a new method of providing postoperative pain relief following femoropopliteal bypass

The extensive incision required for femoropopliteal bypass using saphenous vein causes significant postoperative pain, principally within the distribution of the cutaneous branches of the femoral nerve. This prospective randomized study investigated the efficacy of continuous postoperative femoral nerve block in reducing both pain (visual analogue pain score) and the requirement for opiate analgesia. Ten patients received a femoral nerve block by infusion of 0.5 per cent bupivacaine (5 ml/h for 48 h) via an epidural catheter together with a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device containing morphine; a further ten patients used a PCA device alone. The median postoperative intravenous morphine requirement was significantly reduced in patients with a nerve block at 24 h (4 versus 33 mg, P < 0.01) and at 48 h (5 versus 37 mg, P < 0.01) compared with controls. Postoperative pain was effectively abolished in the former group. The addition of a nerve block to PCA provides superior pain control after femoropopliteal bypass.     

Expression of LECAM-1 and LFA-1 on pre-B lymphoma cells but not on preneoplastic pre-B cells in SL/KH mice

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The efficacy of operatively administered spinal neostigmine to provide analgesia and that of different antiemetics to prevent neostigmine-related nausea and vomiting were evaluated in patients undergoing tibial or ankle reconstruction. METHODS: One hundred patients were randomized to five groups (n = 20). The intravenous antiemetic test drug (except propofol) was given as premedication in the holding room, after intravenous midazolam, 0.05 mg/kg. The subarachnoid drugs administered were 20 mg bupivacaine (0.5%) in conjunction with 100 micrograms neostigmine, except for the saline group (S group), which received bupivacaine and saline. The S group, the neostigmine group (N group), and the propofol group (P group) received saline as the intravenous test drug. The droperidol group (D group) received intravenous droperidol 0.5 mg, and the metoclopramide group (M group) received intravenous metoclopramide 10 mg. The P group had a continuous intravenous propofol infusion (2-4 mg/kg/hr), started 10 minutes after the spinal injection. Nausea, emetic episodes, and the need for analgesic (disclofenac) or antiemetic medication were recorded for the first 24 hours following surgery and scored by a 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS). RESULTS: Subarachnoid neostigmine 100 micrograms did not affect subarachnoid bupivacaine analgesia as measured by time to first rescue analgesic in most patients, but it decreased the overall 24-hour visual analog scale (VAS) scores and the need for postoperative analgesics in 24 hours (P < .001). The incidence of intraoperative nausea and vomiting was higher in the N, D, and M groups than in the S group (P < .001). Following surgery, the 3-hour VAS assessment for emesis was higher for the N, P, and M groups than for the S group (P < .05). The overall 24-hour assessment was similar among groups. CONCLUSIONS: Subarachnoid neostigmine reduced postoperative pain scores and analgesic requirements. Whether it prolonged the duration of action of diclofenac or enhanced the mechanisms involved in spinal analgesia cannot be determined from these data. Although propofol and droperidol appeared to be more effective during and after surgery, respectively, all neostigmine groups were associated with a high consumption of antiemetics.