Morphology and mechanical properties of biaxially oriented films of polypropylene and HDPE blends

Biaxially oriented films of blends of high-density polyethylene (HDPE) with polypropylene (PP) homopolymer and PP copolymers prepared by twin-screw extrusion and lab-stretcher have been investigated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), polarized microscopy, differential-scanning calorimeter, and universal testing machine. Three different kinds of PP copolymers were used: (i) ethylene–propylene (EP) random copolymer; (ii) ethylene–propylene (EP) block copolymer; (iii) ethylene–propylene–buttylene (EPB) terpolymer. In the SEM study of the morphology of films of HDPE with various PP blends, phase separation is observed between the PP phase and the HDPE phase for all blends and compositions. In all blends, HDPE serves to reduce the average spherulites size, probably acting as a nucleating agent for PP. The reduction of spherulite size appeared most significantly in the blend of EPB terpolymer and HDPE. A large increase of crystallization temperature was found in the blend of EPB terpolymer and HDPE compared with the unblended EPB terpolymer. For the blend of EPB terpolymer and HDPE, the improvement of tensile strength and modulus is observed with an increase of HDPE content, and this can be considered as a result of the role of HDPE in reducing average spherulite size. © 1994 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Study on morphology of ternary polymer blends. I. Effects of melt viscosity and interfacial interaction

The morphology of some ternary blends was investigated. In all of the blends polypropylene, as the major phase, was blended with two different minor phases, ethylene–propylene–diene terpolymer (EPDM) or ethylene–propylene–rubber (EPR) as the first minor phase and high‐density polyethylene (HDPE) or polystyrene (PS) as the second minor phase. All the blends were investigated in a constant composition of 70/15/15 wt %. Theoretical models predict that the dispersed phase of a multiphase polymer blend will either form an encapsulation‐type phase morphology or phases will remain separately dispersed, depending on which morphology has the lower free energy or positive spreading coefficient. Interfacial interaction between phases was found to play a significant role in determining the type of morphology of these blend systems. A core–shell‐type morphology for HDPE encapsulated by rubber was obtained for PP/rubber/PE ternary blends, whereas PP/rubber/PS blends showed a separately dispersed type of morphology. These results were found to be in good agreement with the theoretical predictions. Steady‐state torque for each component was used to study the effect of melt viscosity ratio on the morphology of the blends. It was found that the torque ratios affect only the size of the dispersed phases and have no appreciable influence on the type of morphology. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 82: 1129–1137, 2001     

Blend compatibilizers based on silane‐ and maleic anhydride–modified polyolefins

Polypropylene (PP)/polyamide blends were compatibilized with PP modified with vinylsilane or maleic anhydride and ethylene–propylene random (EPR) copolymer modified with maleic anhydride. The thermal behavior, mechanical properties, and morphology of the blends were investigated. Thermal analysis showed that the polyamide crystallization temperatures shifted downward with all compatibilizers, whereas its melting behavior did not change. On the other hand, polypropylene crystallization temperatures shifted upward in all cases, except for blends containing EPR modified with maleic anhydride. Tensile strength and elongation at break increased for blends compatibilized with modified PP. Blends containing up to 7% of EPR modified with maleic anhydride did not show good yield stresses. The morphology of the blends showed a finer dispersion of the polyamide minor phase in the PP matrix. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 88: 2492–2498, 2003     

Phase separation and crystallization behavior in extruded polypropylene/ethylene–propylene rubber blends

Liquid–liquid (L–L) phase separation and its effects on crystallization in polypropylene (PP)/ethylene–propylene rubber (EPR) blends obtained by melt extrusion were investigated by time‐resolved light scattering (TRLS) and optical microscopy. L–L phase separation via spinodal decomposition (SD) was confirmed by TRLS data. After L–L phase separation at 250°C for various durations, blend samples were subjected to a temperature drop to 130°C for isothermal crystallization, and the effects of L–L phase separation on crystallization were investigated. Memory of the L–L phase separation via SD remained for crystallization. The crystallization rate decreased with increasing L–L phase‐separated time at 250°C. Slow crystallization for the long L–L phase‐separated time could be ascribed to decreasing chain mobility of PP with a decrease in the EPR component in the PP‐rich region. The propylene‐rich EPR exhibited good affinity with PP, leading to a slow growth of a concentration fluctuation during annealing. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 81: 695–700, 2001     

The Use of Ethylene/Propylene Copolymers as Compatibilizers for Recycled Polyolefin Blends

Compatibilizing effects of ethylene/propylene (EPR) diblock copolymers on the morphology and mechanical properties of immiscible blends produced from recycled low‐density polyethylene (PE‐LD) and high‐density polyethylene (PE‐HD) with 20 wt.‐% of recycled poly(propylene) (PP) were investigated. Two different EPR block copolymers which differ in ethylene monomer unit content were applied to act as interfacial agents. The morphology of the studied blends was observed by scanning‐ (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). It was found that both EPR copolymers were efficient in reducing the size of the dispersed phase and improving adhesion between PE and PP phases. Addition of 10 wt.‐% of EPR caused the formation of the interfacial layer surrounding dispersed PP particles with the occurrence of PE‐LD lamellae interpenetration into the layer. Tensile properties (elongation at yield, yield stress, elongation at break, Young's modulus) and notched impact strength were measured as a function of blend composition and chemical structure of EPR. It was found that the EPR with a higher content of ethylene monomer units was a more efficient compatibilizer, especially for the modification of PE‐LD/PP 80/20 blend. Notched impact strength and ductility were greatly improved due to the morphological changes and increased interfacial adhesion as a result of the EPR localization between the phases. No significant improvements of mechanical properties for recycled PE‐HD/PP 80/20 blend were observed by the addition of selected block copolymers.     

Fabrication of polypropylene blends with excellent low‐temperature toughness and balanced toughness‐rigidity by a combination of EPR and SEEPS

To overcome serious rigidity depression of rubber‐toughened plastics and fabricate a rigidity‐toughness balanced thermoplastic, a combination of styrene‐[ethylene‐(ethylene‐propylene)]‐styrene block copolymer (SEEPS) and ethylene‐propylene rubber (EPR) was used to toughen polypropylene. The dynamic mechanical properties, crystallization and melting behavior, and mechanical properties of polypropylene (PP)/EPR/SEEPS blends were studied in detail. The results show that the combination of SEEPS and EPR can achieve the tremendous improvement of low‐temperature toughness without significant strength and rigidity loss. Dynamic mechanical properties and phase morphology results demonstrate that there is a good interfacial strength and increased loss of compound rubber phase comprised of EPR component and EP domain of SEEPS. Compared with PP/EPR binary blends, although neither glass transition temperature (T_g) of the rubber phase nor T_g of PP matrix in PP/EPR/SEEPS blends decreases, the brittle‐tough transition temperature (T_bd) of PP/EPR/SEEPS blends decreases, indicating that the increased interfacial interaction between PP matrix and compound rubber phase is also an effective approach to decrease T_bd of the blends so as to improve low‐temperature toughness. The balance between rigidity and toughness of PP/EPR/SEEPS blends is ascribed to the synergistic effect of EPR and SEEPS on toughening PP. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2018 , 135, 45714.     

Morphology evolution during cooling of quiescent immiscible polymer blends: matrix crystallization effect on the dispersed phase coalescence

The influence of the matrix crystallization on the coalescence of the dispersed phase particles, in quiescent immiscible polymer blends, is a topic that is scientifically addressed scarcely. The coarsening of the phase structure that is induced by the matrix crystallizing domains was studied using the well-established system comprising a polypropylene and an ethylene–propylene rubber (PP/EPR blends). This subject is of great importance as the effectiveness in the toughening of PP is directly determined by the EPR particle size. Cooling experiments were commenced for resolving the correlation among the imposed cooling conditions, the formed matrix crystalline morphology, and the coalescence of the dispersed phase particles. A confirmation of the profound effect of the PP crystallization on the coalescence of EPR particles was undoubtedly obtained. The contribution of the crystallization to the coalescence of the dispersed phase particles is largest at a finite rate of cooling. A thorough discussion regarding the observed effects, encompassing a potential rejection or an engulfing of the dispersed phase particles by the growing crystallites, was undertaken.     

Rheological,thermal, and morphological properties of blends based on poly(propylene), ethylene propylene rubber,and ethylene-1-octene copolymer that could result from end of life vehicles: Effect of maleic anhydride grafted poly(propylene)

The objective of this work is to study the properties of blends that could result from the recycling of end-of-life vehicles (ELV). While ethylene propylene rubber (EPR) and ethylene propylene diene monomer (EPDM) have been used extensively as elastomeric additives in poly(propylene) (PP), they can be substituted by ethylene-1-octene copolymer (EOC). As a consequence, the matter resulting from the sorting of ELV might be more complex and made of PP, EPR, and EOC. The effect of incorporating EOC [that is a polyethylene elastomer (PEE)] and maleic anhydride grafted polypropylene (PP-g-MAH) on the rheological, thermal, and morphological properties of PP/EPR blends has been investigated. Blends of various compositions (with and without compatibilizer) were prepared using a corotating twin-screw extruder. The results were compared to the ones presented by a commercial (PP/EPR) blend. The EPR phase is dispersed in the form of spherical particles in (PP/EPR). The EOC phase is dispersed in the form of aggregated particles. Dynamic viscoelastic and differential scanning calorimetry properties of (PP/EPR)/EOC blends shows the incompatibility of the components even in presence of PP-g-MAH copolymer. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 47:1009–1015, 2007. © 2007 Society of Plastics Engineers     

高温熔融对PP/EPR/PE-UHMW分子链扩散作用以及流变和结晶性能的影响

采用一种简便易行的方法使高度缠结的超高相对分子质量聚乙烯（PE-UHMW）与乙丙橡胶（EPR）的分子链得到有效的扩散,并最终将EPR/PE-UHMW预混物与聚丙烯（PP）共混形成PP/EPR/PE-UHMW三元共混物。并研究了该三元共混物的流变性能和结晶性能。结果表明,在预混物体系中,经历高温熔融处理后,流变曲线出现不同于一般EPR材料的难松弛结构的低频平台区,说明PE-UHMW与EPR分子链相互扩散形成长分子链缠结结构;其缠结结构在PP/EPR/PE-UHMW共混物中减慢了PP基体流变曲线低频平台区出现的趋势,限制了EPR向PP基体的扩散; EPR与PE-UHMW分子链之间的相互扩散,对高度缠结的PE-UHMW具有增塑作用,导致PE-UHMW结晶温度下降和结晶度上升;二元预混物添加进入PP基体中,促使PP多重熔融现象的发生。     

Comparison of olefin copolymers as compatibilizers for polypropylene and high‐density polyethylene

Some polyolefin elastomers were compared as compatibilizers for blends of polypropylene (PP) with 30 wt % high‐density polyethylene (HDPE). The compatibilizers included a multiblock ethylene–octene copolymer (OBC), two statistical ethylene–octene copolymers (EO), two propylene–ethylene copolymers (P/E), and a styrenic block copolymer (SBC). Examination of the blend morphology by AFM showed that the compatibilizer was preferentially located at the interface between the PP matrix and the dispersed HDPE particles. The brittle‐to‐ductile (BD) transition was determined from the temperature dependence of the blend toughness, which was taken as the area under the stress–strain curve. All the compatibilized blends had lower BD temperature than PP. However, the blend compatibilized with OBC had the best combination of low BD temperature and high toughness. Examination of the deformed blends by scanning electron microscopy revealed that in the best blends, the compatibilizer provided sufficient interfacial adhesion so that the HDPE domains were able to yield and draw along with the PP matrix. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2009     

Blends of high density polyethylene and ethylene/1‐octene copolymers: Structure and properties

The morphology formation in the blends comprising a high density polyethylene (HDPE) and selected ethylene/1‐octene copolymers (EOCs) was studied with variation of blend compositions using atomic force microscopy (AFM). The binary HDPE/EOC blends studied showed well phase‐separated structures (macrophase separation) in consistence with individual melting and crystallization behavior of the blend components. For the blends comprising low 1‐octene content copolymers, the lamellar stacks of one of the phases were found to exist side by side with that of the another phase giving rise to leaflet vein‐like appearance. The formation of large HDPE lamellae particularly longer than in the pure state has been explained by considering the different melting points of the blend components. The study of strain induced structural changes in an HDPE/EOC blend revealed that at large strains, the extensive stretching of the soft EOC phase is accompanied by buckling of HDPE lamellar stack along the strain axis and subsequent microfibrils formation. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 103: 1887–1893, 2007     

Compatibilizers for recycling of the plastic mixture wastes. II. The effect of a compatibilizer for binary blends on the properties of ternary blends

In this article, we discuss the effect of a compatibilizer for binary blends on the properties of ternary blends composed of high‐density polyethylene (HDPE), polypropylene (PP), or polystyrene (PS) and poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC) virgin polymers with a simulated waste plastics fraction. Chlorinated polyethylene (CPE), ethylene–propylene rubber (EPR), and their 1/1 (w/w) mixture were tested as compatibilizers for the HDPE/PP/PVC ternary blend. CPE, styrene‐ethylene‐propylene block copolymer (SEP), or their 1/1 (w/w) mixture were tested as compatibilizers for the HDPE/PS/PVC ternary blend. The composition of the ternary blends were fixed at 8/1/1 by weight ratio. The amount of the compatibilizer was 3 phr. Rheological, mechanical, and thermal properties were measured. For the 8/1/1 HDPE/PP/PVC ternary blends, the tensile strength was slightly decreased, but the impact strength was significantly increased by adding EPR, CPE, or their mixture. EPR exhibited the most significant impact modification effect for the ternary blends. In a similar way, for 8/1/1 HDPE/PS/PVC ternary blends, on adding SEP, CPE, or their mixture, the tensile strength was slightly decreased, but the impact strength was noticeably increased. It was found that the SEP worked much better as an impact modifier for the ternary blends than CPE or the SEP/CPE mixture did. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 76: 1048–1053, 2000     

Thermoplastic elastomers from iPP/EPR blends: Crystallization and phase structure development

The phase morphology and structure of thermoplastic elastomers obtained from isotactic polypropylene (iPP) and ethylene—propylene random copolymer (EPR) blends by means of the dynamic curing of EPR rubbery component carried out during its melt mixing with iPP in a Banbury mixer at 180°C were investigated. Samples obtained by compression molding and by using isothermal crystallization conditions of the iPP phase were analyzed by means of differential scanning calorimetry, of optical, scanning, and transmission electron microscopy, and of wide-angle and small-angle X-ray diffraction. The influence of cooling below the melting point and of EPR molecular structure on the kinetic and thermodynamic parameters related to crystallization process of the iPP phase was also studied. It was found that the process of dynamic curing of the EPR component dramatically affects the development of the phase morphology and structure in the material. As a matter of fact, the blend containing the uncured EPR is characterized by the presence of iPP domains randomly distributed in the EPR rubbery matrix, whereas in the blend containing the cured EPR the iPP phase becomes the continuous phase crystallizing in a structure that resembles a cobweb tending to surround the EPR cured particles; moreover such an iPP cobweb appears to be contituted by row structures of stacked lamellae. It was found that the addition of EPR phase interferes dramatically with the crystallization process of the iPP, thus inducing drastic modification in its intrinsic morphology (size, neatness, regularity of spherulites, inner structure of spherulites, etc.). Such interference was found to be comparatively stronger when the iPP phase crystallizes in presence of cured EPR. The elastic behavior of the thermoplastic elastomer material was accounted for by applying the “leaf spring model” to the morphology and structure of the iPP phase crystallized in presence of cured EPR. © 1994 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Melting,nonisothermal crystallization behavior and morphology of polypropylene/random ethylene—propylene copolymer blends

The melting, nonisothermal crystallization behavior and morphology of blends of polypropylene (PP) with random ethylene–propylene copolymer (PP‐R) were studied by differential scanning calorimetry, polarized optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, and X‐ray diffraction. The results showed that PP and PP‐R were very miscible and cocrystallizable. Modified Avrami analysis was used to analyze the nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of the blends. The values of the Avrami exponent indicated that the crystallization nucleation of the blends was heterogeneous, the growth of the spherulites was tridimensional, and the crystallization mechanism of PP was not affected by PP‐R. The crystallization activation energy was estimated using the Kissinger method. An interesting result was obtained with the modified Avrami analysis and the Kissinger method, whose conclusions were in good agreement. The addition of a minor PP‐R phase favored an increase in the overall crystallization rate of PP. Maximum enhancing effect wass found to occur with a PP‐R content of 20 wt %. The relationship between the composition and the morphology of the blends is discussed. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 99: 670–678, 2006     

Structure and properties of PP/POE/HDPE blends

This work was aimed to counteract the effect of ethylene‐α‐olefin copolymers (POE) by reinforcing the polypropylene (PP)/POE blends with high density polyethylene (HDPE) particles and, thus, achieved a balance between toughness and strength for the PP/POE/HDPE blends. The results showed that addition of HDPE resulted in an increasing wide stress plateau and more ductile fracture behavior. With the increase of HDPE content, the elongation at break of the blends increased rapidly without obvious decrease of yield strength and Young's modulus, and the notched izod impact strength of the blends can reach as high as 63 kJ/m² at 20 wt % HDPE loading. The storage modulus of PP blends increased and the glass transition temperature of each component of the blends shifted close to each other when HDPE was added. The crystallization of HDPE phase led to an increase of the total crystallinity of the blend. With increasing HDPE content, the dispersed POE particle size was obviously decreased, and the interparticle distance was effectively reduced and the blend rearranged into much more and obvious core‐shell structure. The fracture surface also changed from irregular striation to the regularly distant striations, displaying much obvious character of tough fracture. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011     

Morphology,crystalline features,and tensile properties of syndiotactic polypropylene blends

Syndiotactic polypropylene (sPP) was modified with ethylene–octene copolymer (EOC) and ethylene–propylene rubber (EPR), with test samples prepared in a twin‐screw extruder and then injection‐molded. The phase morphology, rheology, and thermal and tensile properties of the modified sPP were investigated. Atomic force microscopy studies showed how the phase morphology of the sPP blends with elastomers depended on the blend compositions, and the results compared with the storage modulus at low frequency. EOC and EPR were dispersed phase in an sPP matrix with spherical shapes when the dispersed content was 20 wt % or lower. The phase cocontinuity started around 40 wt % EOC for the sPP–EOC blends and around 60 wt % EPR for the sPP–EPR. The dispersed phase then formed more complex elongated shapes. The rheological and thermal properties were affected by the sPP–elastomer interphase. EOC promoted the crystallization of sPP; this increased the crystallization temperature and rate. In contrast, EPR had the opposite effect on the crystallization behavior, and the results indicate that sPP and EPR were not completely separated. The tensile properties were studied from ?20 to 100 °C. We found that the tensile properties at low temperature could be improved without a loss in high‐temperature properties. In the particular case of 20 wt % EOC, both the strain at yield and strain at break of the sPP–EOC blend were improved at both ?20 and 100 °C. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2017 , 134 , 44611.     

Morphology prediction and the effect of core‐shell structure on the rheological behavior of PP/EPDM/HDPE ternary blends

In this work, the morphologies of polypropylene (PP)/ethylene‐propylene‐diene (EPDM) rubber/high density polyethylene (HDPE) 70/20/10 blends were studied and compared with the predictions of the spreading coefficient and minimum free energy models. The interfacial tension of PP/HDPE, PP/EPDM, and HDPE/EPDM blends were obtained by fitting the experimental dynamic storage modulus data to Palierne's theory. The prediction results showed core‐shell morphology (core of HDPE and shell of EPDM) in PP matrix. The PP/EPDM/HDPE blends were respectively prepared by direct extrusion and lateral injection method. Core‐shell morphology (core of HDPE and shell of EPDM) could be obtained with direct extrusion corresponding to the predicted morphology. The morphology of PP/EPDM/HDPE blends could be effectively controlled by lateral injection method. For PP/EPDM/HDPE blend prepared by lateral injection method, HDPE and EPDM phase were dispersed independently in PP matrix. It was found that the different morphology of PP/EPDM/HDPE blends prepared by two methods showed different rheological behavior. When the core‐shell morphology (core of HDPE and shell of EPDM) appeared, the EPDM shell could confine the deformation of HDPE core significantly, so the interfacial energy contribution of dispersed phase on the storage modulus of blends would be weaken in the low frequency region. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 2011. © 2011 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Impact modification of polypropylene by ethylene propylene copolymer‐grafted maleic anhydride

Blends of polypropylene (PP) and ethylene propylene rubber (EPR) were studied. The effect of the level of rubber addition and the ethylene content is described. The results show that the viscosity of the PP, rubber content, ethylene content, and grafted EPR by maleic anhydride (MA) are important factors in controlling the blend properties. The miscibility and dynamic properties of the blends were studied by DMTA. Impact and tensile properties were also studied. SEM was used for the investigation of the phase morphology and rubber particle size and particle‐size distribution. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 72: 1257–1265, 1999     

Evaluation of olefinic block copolymer blends with amorphous polyolefins—effect of different unsaturated and saturated hydrocarbon tackifier resins on blend miscibility

Blends of ethylene–octene based olefinic block copolymer (OBC) with two amorphous polyolefin (APO) polymers [atactic propylene homopolymer (PP) and ethylene–propylene copolymer (PE–PP)] were evaluated at three different ratios. Dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) evaluations were performed to determine the blend miscibility characteristics. Viscoelastic properties of both OBC blends with PP polymer, and OBC blends with PE–PP copolymer showed incompatibility. Analysis revealed that both blends formed two phase morphologies. The effect of three unsaturated aliphatic hydrocarbon resins with varying aromatic content and two saturated hydrocarbon resins with different chemistries were evaluated as compatibilizing agent for OBC/PP and OBC/PE–PP blends. A 1 : 1 polymer blend ratio of OBC/PP and OBC/PE–PP was selected to better understand the influence of resin addition at three different levels 20, 30, and 40 wt %. The fully aliphatic unsaturated resin seems to improve the miscibility of the OBC/PP blends at higher resin addition levels, but reduced the miscibility as the aromatic content of the resin increases. However, OBC/PE–PP blends showed improved miscibility with increasing aromatic content. A ternary phase morphology was particularly observed for both OBC/PP and OBC/PE–PP blends with highly aromatic (14%) unsaturated hydrocarbon resin, in which OBC formed the continuous phase, and PP, PE–PP, and unsaturated hydrocarbon resins formed the dispersed phase. Interestingly, we did not observe much difference in miscibility characteristics between the two saturated resin chemistries in both blend systems (OBC/PP and OBC/PE–PP). The Harkins spreading coefficient concept was used to better understand the ternary blend dispersed phase morphology. Spreading coefficients indicate that the free hydrocarbon resins (both unsaturated and saturated) were encapsulated by the amorphous PP or amorphous PE–PP polymer in the dispersed phase for the respective blend compositions. Overall OBC–PP and OBC/PE–PP blends showed better miscibility characteristics with both saturated aliphatic hydrocarbon resins, irrespective of the difference in resin chemistries. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 130: 2624–2644, 2013     

Effect of core‐shell morphology evolution on the rheology,crystallization, and mechanical properties of PA6/EPDM‐g‐MA/HDPE ternary blend

In this article, polyamide 6 (PA6), maleic anhydride grafted ethylene‐propylene‐diene monomer (EPDM‐g‐MA), high‐density polyethylene (HDPE) were simultaneously added into an internal mixer to melt‐mixing for different periods. The relationship between morphology and rheological behaviors, crystallization, mechanical properties of PA6/EPDM‐g‐MA/HDPE blends were studied. The phase morphology observation revealed that PA6/EPDM‐g‐MA/HDPE (70/15/15 wt %) blend is constituted from PA6 matrix in which is dispersed core‐shell droplets of HDPE core encapsulated by EPDM‐g‐MA phase and indicated that the mixing time played a crucial role on the evolution of the core‐shell morphology. Rheological measurement manifested that the complex viscosity and storage modulus of ternary blends were notable higher than the pure polymer blends and binary blends which ascribed different phase morphology. Moreover, the maximum notched impact strength of PA6/EPDM‐g‐MA/HDPE blend was 80.7 KJ/m² and this value was 10–11 times higher than that of pure PA6. Particularly, differential scanning calorimetry results indicated that the bulk crystallization temperature of HDPE (114.6°C) was partly weakened and a new crystallization peak appeared at a lower temperature of around 102.2°C as a result of co‐crystal of HDPE and EPDM‐g‐MA. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2013