Compatibilization effects of styrenic/rubber block copolymers in polypropylene/polystyrene blends

Compatibilizing effects of styrene/rubber block copolymers poly(styrene‐b‐butadiene‐b‐styrene) (SBS), poly(styrene‐b‐ethylene‐co‐propylene) (SEP), and two types of poly(styrene‐b‐ethylene‐co‐butylene‐b‐styrene) (SEBS), which differ in their molecular weights on morphology and selected mechanical properties of immiscible polypropylene/polystyrene (PP/PS) 70/30 blend were investigated. Three different concentrations of styrene/rubber block copolymers were used (2.5, 5, and 10 wt %). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) were used to examine the phase morphology of blends. The SEM analysis revealed that the size of the dispersed particles decreases as the content of the compatibilizer increases. Reduction of the dispersed particles sizes of blends compatibilized with SEP, SBS, and low‐molecular weight SEBS agrees well with the theoretical predictions based on interaction energy densities determined by the binary interaction model of Paul and Barlow. The SEM analysis confirmed improved interfacial adhesion between matrix and dispersed phase. The TEM micrographs showed that SBS, SEP, and low‐molecular weight SEBS enveloped and joined pure PS particles into complex dispersed aggregates. Bimodal particle size distribution was observed in the case of SEP and low‐molecular weight SEBS addition. Notched impact strength (a_k), elongation at yield (ε_y), and Young's modulus (E) were measured as a function of weight percent of different types of styrene/rubber block copolymers. The a_k and ε_y were improved whereas E gradually decreased with increasing amount of the compatibilizer. The a_k was improved significantly by the addition of SEP. It was found that the compatibilizing efficiency of block copolymer used is strongly dependent on the chemical structure of rubber block, molecular weight of block copolymer molecule, and its concentration. The SEP diblock copolymer proved to be a superior compatibilizer over SBS and SEBS triblock copolymers. Low‐molecular weight SEBS appeared to be a more efficient compatibilizer in PP/PS blend than high‐molecular weight SEBS. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 72: 291–307, 1999     

Effects of SBS on phase morphology of iPP/aPS blends

The supermolecular structure of binary isotactic polypropylene/poly(styrene‐b‐butadiene‐h‐styrene) (iPP/SBS) and isotactic polypropylene/atactic polystyrene (iPP/aPS) compression molded blends and that of ternary iPP/aPS/SBS blends were studied by optical microscopy, scanning and transmission electron microscopy, wide‐angle X‐ray diffraction and differential scanning calorimetry. Nucleation, crystal growth, solidification and blend phase morphology are affected by the addition of amorphous components (SBS and aPS). As a compatiblizer in immiscible iPP/aPS blends, SBS formed interfacial layer between dispersed honeycomb‐like aPS/SBS particles and the iPP matrix, thus influencing the crystallization process in iPP. The amount of SBS and aPS, and compatibilizing efficiency of SBS, determine the size of dispersed aPS, SBS, and aPS/SBS particles and, consequently, the final blend phase morphologies: well‐developed spherulitic morphology, cross‐hatched structure with blocks of sandwich lamellae and co‐continuous morphology. The analysis of the relationship between the size of spherulites and dispersed particles gave the criterion relation, which showed that, in the case of a well‐developed spherulitization, the spherulites should be about fourteen times larger than the incorporated dispersed particles; i.e. to be large enough to engulf dispersed inclusions without considerable disturbing of the spherulitic structure.     

The effect of graft copolymers of maleic anhydride and epoxy resin on the mechanical properties and morphology of PP/ABS blends

In this work, maleic anhydride‐grafted polypropylene (PP‐g‐MAH) and maleic anhydride‐grafted poly(acrylonitrile‐butadiene‐styrene) (ABS‐g‐MAH) at 2 : 1 mass ratio were added as a compatibilizer in the PP/ABS blends. The compatibilizing effect was evaluated by adding the graft copolymers together with epoxy resin/imidazole curing agent (E51/2E4MZ). The reaction in reactive extrusion, morphological structure, and properties of PP and ABS blends were investigated by using infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and X‐ray spectrum, transmission electron microscope (TEM), dynamic thermomechanical analysis (DMA), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and mechanical properties tests. The results showed that the compatibilizing effect was greatly improved because of the addition of the graft copolymers together with epoxy resin/imidazole curing agent (E51/2E4MZ) because the link structure of PP‐g‐MAH and ABS‐g‐MAH was formed by the reaction of anhydride group with epoxy group catalyzed by the imidazole. The size of the dispersed phase decreased dramatically, the interfacial adhesion between ABS particles and PP matrix was improved, and the tensile strength and flexural modulus of the PP/ABS blends increased further. The optimizing properties were obtained at 3 phr E51/2E4MZ. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2014 , 131, 40898.     

Studies on morphology and mechanical properties of PP/HIPS blends from postconsumer plastic waste

The aim of this work was to study the compatibilizing effect of the triblock copolymer poly(styrene‐b‐ethylene‐co‐butylene‐b‐styrene) (SEBS) on the morphology and mechanical properties of virgin and recycled polypropylene/high‐impact polystyrene (PP/HIPS) blends. The components of the blend were obtained from municipal plastics waste (MPW), with the PP obtained from blue mineral water bottles, symbolized as PP_b, and the HIPS from disposable cups. These materials were preground, washed only with water, dried with hot air, and ground again (PP_b) or agglutinated (HIPS). Blends of PP_b and HIPS in three weight ratios (6:1, 6:2, and 6:3) were prepared, and three concentrations of SEBS (5.0, 6.0, and 6.7% w/w) were used for investigations of its compatibilizing effect. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) showed that SEBS reduced the diameter of HIPS dispersed particles that were globular and fibril shaped, along with improving the adhesion between the dispersed phase and the matrix. On the other hand, SEBS interactions with PP_b and HIPS influenced the mechanical properties of the compatibilized PP_b/HIPS/SEBS blends. The optimal concentration of SEBS was 5 wt % for application to composite films with similar characteristics to synthetic paper. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 87: 747–751, 2003     

Influences of dicumyl peroxide on morphology and mechanical properties of polypropylene/poly(styrene‐b‐butadiene‐b‐styrene) blends via vane‐extruder

Polypropylene (PP) and poly(styrene‐b‐butadiene‐b‐styrene) block copolymer (SBS) were melt‐blended in the presence of initiator system. Dicumyl peroxide (DCP)/Triallyl isocyanurate (TAIC) via self‐deigned VE, aiming at in situ reactive compatibilization of toughed PP/SBS blend. The reactivity, morphology and mechanical properties of PP/SBS/DCP/TAIC blends were studied. Online torque detection was conducted to monitor changes in viscosities of reactive compatibilized blends, which could give proof of the interfacial grafted reaction induced by DCP/TAIC system. The effect of reactive compatibilization on the dispersed particles sizes and interfacial adhesion was studied by scanning electron microscopy. Analysis on mechanical performance revealed the impact strength improved after treated by initiator system, moreover, the impact‐fractured surface observation showed, the failure mode changed from debonding mechanism of neat 50PP/50SBS blend to plastic deformation mechanism of blend containing 3.0 phr initiator system. With improved interfacial adhesion, compatibilized blends not only were toughened but also exhibited enhanced tensile strength and thermal stability. Dynamic mechanical analysis showed a reduction of between PP phase and the PB segments in SBS phase, indicating reactive compatibilization of the blend was achieved. In the final part, a brief discussion was given about the dominant effects from chain scission of PP matrix to intergrafting reactions of PP and SBS, under different content of DCP/TAIC initiator system. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015 , 132, 41543.     

Relationship between branch length and the compatibilizing effect of polypropylene‐g‐polystyrene graft copolymer on polypropylene/polystyrene blends

Three polypropylene‐g‐polystyrene (PP‐g‐PS) graft copolymers with the same branch density but different branch lengths were evaluated as compatibilizing agents for PP/PS blends. The morphological and rheological results revealed that the addition of PP‐g‐PS graft copolymers significantly reduced the PS particle size and enhanced the interfacial adhesion between PP and PS phases. Furthermore, it is verified that the branch length of PP‐g‐PS graft copolymer had opposite effects on its compatibilizing effect: on one hand, increasing the branch length could improve the compatibilizing effect of graft copolymer on PP/PS blends, demonstrated by the reduction of PS particle size and the enhancement of interfacial adhesion; on the other hand, increasing the branch length would increase the melt viscosity of PP‐g‐PS graft copolymer, which prevented it from migrating effectively to the interface of blend components. Additionally, the crystallization and melting behaviors of PP and PP/PS blends were compared. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2014 , 131, 40126.     

Morphology and mechanical properties of polypropylene/high‐impact polystyrene blends from postconsumer plastic waste

The compatibilizing effect of the triblock copolymer poly(styrene‐b‐ethylene‐co‐butylene‐b‐styrene) (SEBS) on the morphological and mechanical properties of virgin and recycled polypropylene (PP)/high‐impact polystyrene (HIPS) blends was studied, with the properties optimized for rigid composite films. The components of the blend were obtained from municipal plastic waste, PP being acquired from mineral water bottles (PP_b) and HIPS from disposable cups. These materials were preground, washed only with water, dried with hot air, and ground again (PP_b) or agglutinated (HIPS). Blends with three different weight ratios of PP_b and HIPS (6:1, 6:2, and 6:3) were prepared, and three different concentrations of SEBS (5, 6, and 7 wt %) were used for investigations of its compatibilizing effect. Scanning electron microscopy showed that SEBS reduced the diameter of dispersed HIPS particles in the globular and fibril shapes and improved the adhesion between the disperse phase and the matrix. However, SEBS interactions with PP_b and HIPS influenced the mechanical properties of the compatibilized PP_b/HIPS/SEBS blends. An adequate composition of PP/HIPS, for both virgin and recycled blends, for applications in composite films with characteristics similar to those of synthetic paper was obtained with a minimal amount of SEBS and a maximal HIPS/PP ratio in the range of concentrations studied. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 88: 2861–2867, 2003     

Phase morphology,thermomechanical, and crystallization behavior of uncompatibilized and PP‐g‐MAH compatibilized polypropylene/polystyrene blends

In this article, we discuss the phase morphology, thermal, mechanical, and crystallization properties of uncompatibilized and compatibilized polypropylene/polystyrene (PP/PS) blends. It is observed that the Young's modulus increases, but other mechanical properties such as tensile strength, flexural strength, elongation at break, and impact strength decrease by blending PS to PP. The tensile strength and Young's modulus of PP/PS blends were compared with various theoretical models. The thermal stability, melting, and crystallization temperatures and percentage crystallinity of semicrystalline PP in the blends were marginally decreased by the addition of amorphous PS. The presence of maleic anhydride‐grafted polypropylene (compatibilizer) increases the phase stability of 90/10 and 80/20 blends by preventing the coalescence. Hence, finer and more uniform droplets of PS dispersed phases are observed. The compatibilizer induced some improvement in impact strength for the blends with PP matrix phase, however fluctuations in modulus, strength and ductility were observed with respect to the uncompatibilized blend. The thermal stability was not much affected by the addition of the compatibilizer for the PP rich blends but shows some decrease in the thermal stability of the blends, where PS forms the matrix. On the other hand, the % crystallinity was increased by the addition of compatibilizer, irrespective of the blend concentration. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015 , 132, 42100.     

Rheological properties of polystyrene blends with rigid ladderlike polyphenylsilsesquioxane

Polystyrene (PS) blends with rigid ladderlike polyphenylsilsesquioxane (PPSQ) were prepared by solution casting followed by hot pressing. The rheological properties of these blends were studied under dynamic shear and uniaxial elongation conditions. The loss modulus (G″) and dynamic shear viscosity (η*) of the 95/5 PP/PPSQ blend were slightly lower than those of pure PS at low frequencies (≤10^?2 rad/s). However, the storage modulus (G′), G″, and η* of the other blends (90/10, 85/15, and 80/20) were higher than those of pure PS and increased with PPSQ content. The η_E data demonstrated that PS/PPSQ blends exhibited slightly weaker (5% PPSQ) or much weaker (10% PPSQ) strain hardening than PS. In contrast, the 85/15 and 80/20 PP/PPSQ blends showed strain softening, and the extent of strain softening increased with PPSQ content. PS entanglements might have been reduced by the specific interactions between PS and PPSQ, which locally ordered some PS molecules in the 95/5 blend sample, because most of the PPSQ might have been well dispersed in the PS continuous phase, and only a few small PPSQ particles (～1.3 μm) were formed because of good miscibility. However, at high PPSQ contents (≥10%), many larger hard PPSQ particles were formed, which acted as fillers during the rheological measurements. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 96: 706–713, 2005     

Compatibilized blends of PVC/PA12 and PVC/PP containing poly(lauryl lactam‐block‐caprolactone)

Specially designed block copolymers have played a role as compatibilizing agents in the system of immiscible polymer blends. We applied lauryl lactam (LA)–caprolactone (CL) block copolymer [P(LA‐b‐CL)] as a compatibilizing agent for immiscible poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC) blends with various polymers. These blends possess high thermal performance and toughness. We investigated the effect of P(LA‐b‐CL) as a compatibilizing agent for immiscible PVC blends with poly(ω‐lauryl lactam) [polyamide 12 (PA12)]. We also described the invention of a new compatibilizing agent system involving P(LA‐b‐CL) for PVC/polypropylene (PP) blends. The mechanical and thermal properties of (1) PVC/PA12 blend compatibilized with P(LA‐b‐CL) and (2) PVC/PP blend compatibilized with P(LA‐b‐CL)/PA12/maleic anhydride–modified PP were both enhanced. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 91: 1983‐1992, 2004     

A study on the effects of SEBS‐g‐MAH on the phase morphology and mechanical properties of polypropylene/polycarbonate/SEBS ternary polymer blends

In this work, five ternary blends based on 70% by weight (wt %) of polypropylene (PP) with 30% wt of polycarbonate (PC)/poly(styrene‐b‐(ethylene‐co‐butylene)‐b‐styrene)(SEBS) dispersed phase consists of 15 wt % PC and 15 wt % reactive (maleic anhydride grafted) and nonreactive SEBS mixtures at various ratios were prepared in a co‐rotating twin screw extruder. scanning electron microscopy (SEM) micrographs showed that the blends containing only nonreactive SEBS exhibited a fine dispersion of core‐shell particles. With decreasing the SEBS/SEBS‐g‐Maleic Anhydride (MAH) weight ratio, the morphology changed from the core‐shell particles to a mixed of core‐shell, rod‐like and individual particles. This variation in phase morphology affected the thermal and mechanical properties of the blends. DSC results showed that the blends containing only nonreactive SEBS exhibited a minimum in degree of crystallinity due to the homogeneous nucleation of core‐shell particles. Mechanical testing showed that in the SEBS/SEBS‐g‐MAH weight ratio of 50/50, the modulus and impact strength increased compared with the PP matrix while the yield stress had minimum difference with that of PP matrix. These effects could be attributed to the formation of those especial microstructures revealed by the SEM studies. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011     

Compatibilization and morphology development of immiscible ternary polymer blends

We report a novel and effective strategy that compatibilizes three immiscible polymers, polyolefins, styrene polymers, and engineering plastics, achieved by using a polyolefin-based multi-phase compatibilizer. Compatibilizing effect and morphology development are investigated in a model ternary immiscible polymer blends consisting of polypropylene (PP)/polystyrene(PS)/polyamide(PA6) and a multi-phase compatibilizer (PP-g-(MAH-co-St) as prepared by maleic anhydride (MAH) and styrene (St) dual monomers melt grafting PP. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) results indicate that, as a multi-phase compatibilizer, PP-g-(MAH-co-St) shows effective compatibilization in the PP/PS/PA6 blends. The particle size of both PS and PA6 is greatly decreased due to the addition of multi-phase compatibilizer, while the interfacial adhesion in immiscible pairs is increased. This good compatibilizing effect is promising for developing a new, technologically attractive method for achieving compatibilization of immiscible multi-component polymer blends as well as for recycling and reusing of such blends. For phase morphology development, the morphology of PP/PS/PA6 (70/15/15) uncompatibilized blend reveals that the blend is constituted from PP matrix in which are dispersed composite droplets of PA6 core encapsulated by PS phase. Whereas, the compatibilized blend shows the three components strongly interact with each other, i.e. multi-phase compatibilizer has good compatibilization between the various immiscible pairs. For the 40/30/30 blend, the morphology changed from a three-phase co-continuous morphology (uncompatibilized) to the dispersed droplets of PA6 and PS in the PP matrix (compatibilized).     

Effect of mixer resident time on the overall moduli of polymer blends

The overall moduli tensor of polymer blends is one of the most important characteristics of microscopic morphology development. This article focused on the analysis of dependence of the moduli on mixer resident time in terms of polypropylene–polystyrene (PP/PS) and polypropylene– polyamide1010 (PP/PA1010) blends. Tensile tests on the PP/PS and PP/PA1010 blends with a series of mixer resident times showed a marked change during the initial mixing stage, which may be due to the evolution of particle size and distribution from inhomogeneous to homogeneous. The two cases of periodic spatial distribution of the identical spherical particles were proposed to model the well‐ dispersed and slightly aggregating morphologies in the steady state. Based on the micromechanical model, the moduli of polymer blends were calculated by incorporating the influences of spatial distribution and Poisson's ratio of dispersed particles. Theoretical results indicated that spatial distribution should have little effect on the overall moduli in the steady state. Analysis of the blend system PP/PA1010 with and without compatibilizing agent showed good agreement between the calculations and experiments. Because the interfacial properties were not taken into account, the model gave an overestimate prediction for immiscible blends, like PP/PS for example. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 85: 307–314, 2002     

Effect of styrene–isoprene–styrene,styrene–butadiene–styrene,and styrene–butadiene–rubber on the mechanical,thermal, rheological,and morphological properties of polypropylene/polystyrene blends

The mechanical, thermal, rheological, and morphological properties of polypropylene (PP)/polystyrene (PS) blends compatibilized with styrene–isoprene–styrene (SIS), styrene–butadiene–styrene (SBS), and styrene–butadiene–rubber (SBR) were studied. The incompatible PP and PS phases were effectively dispersed by the addition of SIS, SBS, and SBR as compatibilizers. The PP/PS blends were mechanically evaluated in terms of the impact strength, ductility, and tensile yield stress to determine the influence of the compatibilizers on the performance properties of these materials. SIS‐ and SBS‐compatibilized blends showed significantly improved impact strength and ductility in comparison with SBR‐compatibilized blends over the entire range of compatibilizer concentrations. Differential scanning calorimetry indicated compatibility between the components upon the addition of SIS, SBS, and SBR by the appearance of shifts in the melt peak of PP toward the melting range of PS. The melt viscosity and storage modulus of the blends depended on the composition, type, and amount of compatibilizer. Scanning electron microscopy images confirmed the compatibility between the PP and PS components in the presence of SIS, SBS, and SBR by showing finer phase domains. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 88: 266–277, 2003     

Compatibilizing efficiency of copolymer precursors for immiscible polymer blends

An anhydride‐terminated polystyrene (PS‐b‐Anh) as a block copolymer precursor and a copolymer (PS‐co‐TMI) of styrene (St) and 3‐isopropenyl‐α,α‐dimethylbenzene isocyanate (TMI) as a graft copolymer precursor are chosen to investigate the effect of the type of the copolymer precursor on its compatibilizing and stabilizing efficiency for polymer blends. Results show that during the melt blending of the PS and PA6, the addition of PS‐b‐Anh dramatically decreases the size of the dispersed phase domains, irrespective of its molecular weight. This indicates that a diblock copolymer PS‐block‐PA6 (PS‐b‐PA6) is formed by a reaction between the terminal anhydride moiety of the PS‐b‐Anh and the terminal amine group of the PA6. When PS/PA6 (30/70) blends are annealed at 230°C for 15 min, their morphologies are much more stable in the presence of the PS‐b‐Anh block copolymer precursor than in the presence of the PS‐co‐TMI graft copolymer precursor. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2012     

A novel combination of sandwich and co‐continuous structure based on polypropylene and styrene‐butadiene‐styrene block copolymer formed with wide range of polypropylene content

The styrene–butadiene–styrene block copolymer (SBS)/polypropylene (PP) blends with a unique sandwich layered co‐continuous structure were prepared by melt compounding. Differing from single conventional co‐continuous and sandwich structure, this structure was formed, where pure PP and co‐continuous SBS/PP phase acting as the face sheets and core. Even though the volume content was 20 or 10 vol %, PP always amazingly formed a continuous phase in SBS/PP blends, whereas the morphology of SBS phase relatively changed from dispersed particles to continuous network as its content increased to 50 vol %. For immiscible SBS/PP blends, due to the huge difference of complex viscosity and surface tension between SBS and PP, a pure PP layer existed on the surface of blends which can be ascribed to the PP enrichment. Herein, the structure of blends with more than 50 vol % SBS was presented as sandwich layered co‐continuous structure by combining the pure PP layer and co‐continuous structure. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2018 , 135, 46580.     

The effect of matrix toughness and dispersed elastomer phase on the brittle-ductile transition in PP/HDPE/SBS blends

In this paper the sbrittle-ductile transition of polypropylene, high density polyethylene, and a styrene-butadiene-styrene triblock copolymer (PP/HDPE/SBS) ternary blends is investigated for fixed compositions and prepared under various conditions. The morphology of the SBS dispersed phase particles and impact strength of the PP ternary blends is closely related to the processing conditions. There is a sharp Brittle-Ductile transition for the ternary blends when interparticle distance T becomes less than the critical interparticle distance T_c. Both the impact strength in general and more specifically, T_c depend upon the toughness of the PP/HDPE composite matrix.     

The study of polystyrene blends: The relationship of phases and structure in blends of polystyrene with ethylene–propylene diene monomer rubber and its grafted copolymer

Pressed films of blends of polystyrene (PS) with ethylene–propylene diene monomer rubber (EPDM) or grafted copolymer of styrene (St) onto EPDM (EPDM-g-St) rubber were examined by small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS), and scanning electron microscope (SEM). Small-angle X-ray scattering from the relation of phase was analyzed using Porod's Law and led to value of interface layer on blends. The thickness of interface layer (σ_b) had a maximum value at 50/50 (PS–EPDM-g-St) on blends. The radius of gyration of dispersed phase (domain) and correlation distances a_c in blends of PS–EPDM-g-St were calculated using the data of SAXS. The morphology and structure of blends were investigated by SEM. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 70: 805–810, 1998     

Study on the microstructures and mechanical behaviour of compatibilized polypropylene/polyamide‐6 blends

A series of blends of polypropylene (PP)–polyamide‐6 (PA6) with either reactive polyethylene–octene elastomer (POE) grafted with maleic anhydride (POE‐g‐MA) or with maleated PP (PP‐g‐MA) as compatibilizers were prepared. The microstructures and mechanical properties of the blends were investigated by means of tensile and impact testing and by scanning electron microscopy and transmission electron microscopy. The results indicated that the miscibility of PP–PA6 blends was improved with the addition of POE‐g‐MA and PP‐g‐MA. For the PP/PA6/POE‐g‐MA system, an elastic interfacial POE layer was formed around PA6 particles and the dispersed POE phases were also observed in the PP matrix. Its Izod impact strength was four times that of pure PP matrix, whilst the tensile strength and Young's modulus were almost unchanged. The greatest tensile strength was obtained for PP/PA6/PP‐g‐MA blend, but its Izod impact strength was reduced in comparison with the pure PP matrix. © 2002 Society of Chemical Industry     

Co-continuous and encapsulated three phase morphologies in uncompatibilized and reactively compatibilized polyamide 6/polypropylene/polystyrene ternary blends using two reactive precursors

Phase morphology development in ternary uncompatibilized and reactively compatibilized blends based on polyamide 6 (PA6), polypropylene (PP) and polystyrene (PS) has been investigated. Reactive compatibilization of the blends has been performed using two reactive precursors; maleic anhydride grafted polypropylene (PP-g-MA) and styrene maleic anhydride copolymer (SMA) for PA6/PP and PA6/PS pairs, respectively. For comparison purposes, uncompatibilized and reactively compatibilized PA6/PP and PA6/PS binary blends, were first investigated. All the blends were melt-blended using a co-rotating twin-screw extruder. The phase morphology investigated using scanning electron microscope (SEM) and selective solvent extraction tests revealed that PA6/PP/PS blends having a weight percent composition of 70/15/15 is constituted from polyamide 6 matrix in which are dispersed composite droplets of PP core encapsulated by PS phase. Whereas, a co-continuous three-phase morphology was formed in the blends having a composition of 40/30/30. This morphology has been significantly affected by the reactive compatibilization. In the compatibilized PA6/(PP/PP–MA)/(PS/SMA) blends, PA6 phase was no more continuous but gets finely dispersed in the PS continuous phase. The DSC measurements confirmed the dispersed character of the PA6 phase. Indeed, in the compatibilized PA6/(PP/PP–MA)/(PS/SMA) blends where the PA6 particle size was smaller than 1 μm, the bulk crystallization temperature of PA6 (188 °C) was completely suppressed and a new crystallization peak emerges at a lower temperature of 93 °C as a result of homogeneous nucleation of PA6.