Mechanical properties and morphology of impact modified polypropylene–wood flour composites

The mechanical properties and morphology of polypropylene/wood flour (PP/WF) composites with different impact modifiers and maleated polypropylene (MAPP) as a compatibilizer have been studied. Two different ethylene/propylene/diene terpolymers (EPDM) and one maleated styrene–ethylene/butylene–styrene triblock copolymer (SEBS–MA) have been used as impact modifiers in the PP/WF systems. All three elastomers increased the impact strength of the PP/WF composites but the addition of maleated EPDM and SEBS gave the greatest improvements in impact strength. Addition of MAPP did not affect the impact properties of the composites but had a positive effect on the composite unnotched impact strength when used together with elastomers. Tensile tests showed that MAPP had a negative effect on the elongation at break and a positive effect on tensile strength. The impact modifiers were found to decrease the stiffness of the composites. Scanning electron microscopy showed that maleated EPDM and SEBS had a stronger affinity for the wood surfaces than did the unmodified EPDM. The maleated elastomers are, therefore, expected to form a flexible interphase around the wood particles giving the composites better impact strength. MAPP further enhanced adhesion between WF and impact-modified PP systems. EPDM and EPDM–MA rubber domains were homogeneously dispersed in the PP matrix, the diameter of domains being between 0.1–1 μm. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 67:1503–1513, 1998     

Effect of the elastomer type on the microstructure and mechanical properties of polypropylene

In this study, the effects of the elastomer type—ethylene–propylene–diene monomer (EPDM), three kinds of ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA 9, EVA 18, and EVA 28, where the number is the vinyl acetate concentration), and styrene–butadiene–styrene—and content on the microstructure and mechanical and thermal properties of isotactic polypropylene (i‐PP) blends were investigated. Five different elastomer concentrations (3, 6, 9, 12, and 15 wt %) were added to i‐PP to produce polypropylene/elastomer blends. The yield and tensile strengths, elastic modulus, impact strength, hardness, melt flow index (MFI), and structural properties of the blends were investigated. The tensile and yield strengths, elastic modulus, and hardness decreased gradually, whereas the impact strength and MFI increased as the elastomer content increased. As a result, with respect to the impact strength, the most effective elastomers were EPDM with 15 wt % and EVA 28 with 15 wt % for higher impact strength values. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 98: 1445–1450, 2005     

Effect of styrene–ethylene–butadiene–styrene and its synergetic effect with ethylene vinyl acetate on the mechanical,thermal, dielectric,and water‐treeing behaviors of crosslinked polyethylene

In this study, we investigated the effect of an aromatic polymer, styrene–ethylene–butadiene–styrene (SEBS), on the water‐tree resistance of crosslinked polyethylene (XLPE), and the synergetic effect of SEBS and ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) was also investigated. The XLPE/SEBS and XLPE/SEBS/EVA samples were characterized by means of differential scanning calorimetry, scanning electron microscopy, mechanical measurements, and an accelerated water‐treeing experiment, and the obtained results clearly show the relevant influence of SEBS and EVA, and as expected, the addition of SEBS and EVA was found to synergistically influence the water‐tree resistance of XLPE more positively in comparison with that without the addition of EVA. In addition, it also indicated that the blends possessed excellent dielectric behaviors, such as the dielectric constant and dissipation factor. The crystallization of the blends decreased with increasing SEBS content and addition of EVA. However, the melting temperature of the blends increased with the addition of SEBS and EVA, but the melting temperature of the blends decreased with increasing SEBS content. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2010     

Influence of compatibilizers on mechanical properties,crystallization, and morphology of polypropylene/scrap rubber dust blends

Polypropylene blends containing a dispersed phase of scrap rubber dusts obtained from sport shoes manufacture; midsole (M, vulcanized EVA foam) and outsole (O, vulcanized rubber blend of NR, SBR, and BR) were studied. The influence of various compatibilizers on the mechanical properties of these blends were investigated. Significant development of impact strength was attained by using 6 and 10 phr of styrene–ethylene–butylene–styrene (SEBS) and maleic anhydride‐grafted styrene–ethylene–butylene–styrene (SEBS‐g‐MA) as compatibilizers for both compounds filled with midsole and outsole dusts. The tensile strength of each compound was slightly decreased when the compatibilizer loading increased, whereas the elongation at break was significantly increased. The enhancements of the impact strength and the elongation at break are believed to arise from reduction of interfacial tension between two phases of the rubber and the PP, which results in some reduction of the particle size of the fillers. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) confirmed the evidence of the reduction of scrap rubber dust into small rubber particle sizes in the compound, and also showed the occurrence of some fibrils. Optical microscopy (crossed polars) observations suggested that the addition of the rubber dust resulted in a less regular spherulite texture and less sharp spherulite boundaries. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 86: 148–159, 2002     

Impact strength and dynamic mechanical properties correlation in elastomer‐modified polypropylene

This article describes the impact and dynamic mechanical properties of rubber‐modified binary blends of polypropylene (PP). Two conventional elastomers [viz. ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer (EVA) and ethylene propylene diene terpolymer (EPDM)] were used as an impact modifier for PP. It is clearly indicated by the results that EPDM is better than EVA as an impact modifier of PP. Analysis of data of dynamic mechanical properties and impact properties at various compositions of the blends revealed a direct correlation between impact properties and dynamic mechanical loss tangent. The energy dissipation due to viscoelastic relaxation is therefore suggested as a mechanism of impact toughening of PP, in addition to the other commonly known mechanisms of toughening (viz. shear yielding and crazing induced by deformation of rubber‐phase domains). © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 78: 962–971, 2000     

SBS and SEBS block copolymers as impact modifiers for polypropylene compounds

Blends of polypropylene (PP) and thermoplastic elastomers (TPE), namely SBS (styrene‐butadiene‐styrene) and SEBS (styrene‐ethylene/1‐butene‐styrene) block copolymers, were prepared to evaluate the effectiveness of the TPE type as an impact modifier for PP and influence of the concentration of elastomer on the polymer properties. Polypropylene homopolymer (PP‐H) and ethylene–propylene random copolymer (PP‐R) were evaluated as the PP matrix. Results showed that TPEs had a nucleating effect that caused the PP crystallization temperature to increase, with SBS being more effective than SEBS. Microstructure characterization tests showed that in most cases PP/SEBS blends showed the smallest rubber droplets regardless of the matrix used. It was seen that SEBS is a more effective toughening agent for PP than SBS. At 0°C the Izod impact strength of the PP‐H/SEBS 30% b/w blend was twofold higher than the SBS strength, with the PP‐R/SEBS 30% b/w blend showing no break. A similar behavior on tensile properties and flexural modulus were observed in both PP/TPE blends. Yield stress and tensile strength decreased and elongation at break increased by expanding the dispersed elastomeric phase in the PP matrix. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 95: 254–263, 2005     

Toughening and reinforcing of polypropylene

To improve the mechanical properties of polypropylene (PP), some elastomers and fillers are used. The impact properties and tensile strength are affected by both the mineral additives and the polymer additives. There are also some changes in the thermal properties. To improve the interfacial adhesion, some low molecular polymers are added to assist the dispersion of the fillers and the uniformity of the various polymers with PP. The addition of low-density polyethylene (LDPE), high-density polyethylene (HDPE), or the styrene–butylene–styrene block copolymer (SBS) can improve the impact properties of PP. The propylene–ethylene copolymer has a more pronounced effect than does the physical blending of PP with PE. Calcium carbonate can reinforce PP resin. The ethylene–vinyl acetate copolymer (EVA) has an effect on the printing properties of the PP. © 1996 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Compositional trend analysis on poly(phenylene ether) based thermoplastic elastomers

Detailed statistical trend analysis of thermoplastic elastomers based on poly (phenylene ether) (PPE), polystyrene (PS), ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) and styrene‐ethylene‐butylene‐styrene (SEBS) was done through Design Expert software by Stat‐Ease. D optimal crossed design was followed to capture the interaction with the parameters. Effect of blend ratio, vinyl acetate (VA) content of EVA, molecular weight (MW) of SEBS and intrinsic viscosity (IV) of PPE on the blend performance (response) was studied in detail. Design of Experiment (DOE) analysis showed the “optimized formulation” of the blend. Increase in PPE‐polystyrene (PS) content increased tensile strength and modulus of the blend, followed by a decrease in strain at break. However, EVA had a reverse effect on tensile strength and modulus. Strain at break increased significantly with increasing SEBS content in the blend. Graphical and numerical optimization showed that superior mechanical properties (tensile strength, strain at break and modulus) could be achieved at VA content ～ 50% at a particular loading of EVA. Low MW SEBS was found to be more compatible with the other components of the blend. Mechanical properties of the quaternary blend were marginally affected with change in IV of PPE in the range of 0.33 to 0.46. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 2007     

Effect of polypropylene on the rheology of co‐continuous PS/SEBS blends

Polypropylene (PP) was added to a co‐continuous blend of polystyrene (PS) and styrene‐ethylene/butylene‐styrene (SEBS) to investigate the effect of PP on the morphology and rheological behavior of PS/SEBS blends. For this purpose, a reference blend of 50 wt% PS and 50 wt% SEBS was chosen and an isotactic PP was added to it by increments of 10 wt% up to a maximum of 50 wt% of the total weight. Environmental SEM (ESEM) studies on the PS/SEBS/PP blends showed that PP could be added up to 10 wt% without changing the morphology of the co‐continuous PS/SEBS blend, whereas at 20 wt% PP formed a separate discrete phase. The discrete PP phase finally formed a fully developed matrix structure from 40 wt% onwards. Dynamic rheological measurements showed that at low frequencies the storage modulus was largely unaffected by addition of PP in small concentrations (up to 10 wt%), showing a significant effect of the PP/SEBS interface at low deformation rates. Melt strength tests on the PS/SEBS/PP blends showed the existence of a proportional correlation with their corresponding storage moduli, measured at frequencies from 10–100 rad/s. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 45:1432–1444, 2005. © 2005 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Dynamic mechanical properties and morphology of polypropylene block copolymers and polypropylene/elastomer blends

The relation between the dynamic mechanical properties and the morphology of polypropylene (PP) block copolymers and polypropylene/elastomer blends was studied by dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA), light- and electron microscopy. The latter techniques contributed to an improvement in assignments of relaxation transitions in the DMA spectra. It was established that PP block copolymers had multiphase structure since the ethylene/propylene rubber phase (EPR) formed in the copolymerization contained polyethylene (PE) domains. An identical morphology was found in the case of PP/polyolefin thermoplastic rubber (TPO) blends. Impact modification of PP by styrene/butadiene block copolymers led to a multiphase structure, too, due to the polystyrene (PS) domains aggregated in the soft rubbery polybutadiene phase. In the semicrystalline polyolefinic and in the amorphous styrene/butadienebased thermoplastic rubbers, PE crystallites and PS do mains acted as nodes of the physical network structure, respectively. PP/EPDM/TPO ternary blends developed for replacing high-density PE showed very high dispersion of the modifiers as compared to that of PP block copolymers. This fine dispersion of the impact modifier is a basic regulating factor of impact energy dissipation in the form of shear yielding and crazing.     

PP／PS／SEBS三元共混物的研究

以PS、SEBS为改性剂对PP进行改性。加入PS,体系的强度和刚度得到提高,断裂伸长率和冲击性能下降,对其改变的原因采用SEM进行了结构分析;SEBS是PS的良好相容剂,也是PP很好的增韧剂。同时使用PS和SEBS,体系拉伸强度为24．4MPa,弯曲模量810．6MPa,冲击强度82．0J／m,熔体流动速率12．7g/10min。     

Morphology and mechanical properties of polyamide 12 blends with styrene/ethylene–butylene/styrene rubbers with and without maleation

Blends of polyamide 12 (PA12) with styrene/ethylene–butylene/styrene (SEBS) and maleic anhydride grafted SEBS (SEBS‐g‐MA) were prepared by twin‐screw extrusion and injection molding. The morphology, mechanical properties, and dynamic mechanical properties of the blends were studied. The morphology of the blends was evaluated from the etched surfaces of cryogenically fractured specimens with scanning electron microscopy. The morphological parameters showed that the PA12/SEBS‐g‐MA blends (PM series) exhibited a finer and more uniform rubber dispersion than the PA12/SEBS blends (PS series) because of the interfacial chemical reactions. SEBS functionalization via maleic anhydride grafting strongly affected the morphological parameters, such as the domain size, interfacial area per unit of volume, and critical interparticle distance, but the distribution of the rubber domains in the blends was less affected. Tensile and impact studies showed that the PS blends had worse mechanical properties than the PM blends. The tensile strength and elongation at break of the PM blends were considerably greater than those of the PS blends. The fracture toughness and energy values determined for notched Charpy specimens in high‐speed impact tests were markedly higher for the PM blends than for the PS blends. A similar observation was obtained from instrumented falling weight impact studies. Dynamic mechanical analysis confirmed the incompatibility of the blend components because the glass‐transition temperatures of PA12 and the rubber phase (SEBS and SEBS‐g‐MA) were not affected. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl polym Sci 95: 1376–1387, 2005     

Anomalous mechanical behavior upon recycling of poly(phenylene‐ether)‐based thermoplastic elastomer

Recycling of thermoplastic elastomers based on poly (phenylene ether) (PPE) was studied in detail. The quaternary blend comprising of styrene–ethylene–butylene–styrene (SEBS)/ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA)/PPE‐PS (polystyrene) showed improvement in mechanical properties upon recycling, which was correlated with the formation of crosslinked network in the system. Presence of crosslinked network was confirmed by the gel content analysis. The blend components involved in the crosslinking were evaluated by gel morphology analysis. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy revealed the chemical composition of the crosslinked gel. Crosslinking mechanism was established based on the reactivity of allylic EVA radical during recycling. Rheological study supported the notion of crosslinking upon recycling that resulted in higher storage modulus (G′) as a manifestation of restrained flow by network formation. On the basis of the earlier data, a reaction mechanism for crosslinking was proposed. Finally, structure–property correlation was developed through morphological, chemical, and rheological analysis to understand the anomalous enhancement in mechanical properties upon recycling. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 2008. © 2008 Society of Plastics Engineers     

PP–elastomer–filler hybrids. I. Processing,microstructure, and mechanical properties

Three-component systems with a polypropylene (PP) matrix consisting of polar elastomer (ethylene–propylene rubber and styrene–ethylene–butylene–styrene grafted with maleic anhydride) or of polar PP (PP grafted with maleic anhydride) and filler were investigated. Three microstructures of PP–elastomer–filler hybrids were obtained by processing control and elastomer or PP modification with the maleic anhydride: fillers and rubber particles were separated in the PP matrix, rubber particles with filler core were distributed in the PP matrix, and mixed microstructures of the first and second. A study of mechanical properties showed that the elastic modulus increased in the first microstructure and impact strength increased in the second microstructure. Mechanisms for the relationships between microstructure, processing, and mechanical properties are discussed. © 1996 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Compatibilization effects of styrenic/rubber block copolymers in polypropylene/polystyrene blends

Compatibilizing effects of styrene/rubber block copolymers poly(styrene‐b‐butadiene‐b‐styrene) (SBS), poly(styrene‐b‐ethylene‐co‐propylene) (SEP), and two types of poly(styrene‐b‐ethylene‐co‐butylene‐b‐styrene) (SEBS), which differ in their molecular weights on morphology and selected mechanical properties of immiscible polypropylene/polystyrene (PP/PS) 70/30 blend were investigated. Three different concentrations of styrene/rubber block copolymers were used (2.5, 5, and 10 wt %). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) were used to examine the phase morphology of blends. The SEM analysis revealed that the size of the dispersed particles decreases as the content of the compatibilizer increases. Reduction of the dispersed particles sizes of blends compatibilized with SEP, SBS, and low‐molecular weight SEBS agrees well with the theoretical predictions based on interaction energy densities determined by the binary interaction model of Paul and Barlow. The SEM analysis confirmed improved interfacial adhesion between matrix and dispersed phase. The TEM micrographs showed that SBS, SEP, and low‐molecular weight SEBS enveloped and joined pure PS particles into complex dispersed aggregates. Bimodal particle size distribution was observed in the case of SEP and low‐molecular weight SEBS addition. Notched impact strength (a_k), elongation at yield (ε_y), and Young's modulus (E) were measured as a function of weight percent of different types of styrene/rubber block copolymers. The a_k and ε_y were improved whereas E gradually decreased with increasing amount of the compatibilizer. The a_k was improved significantly by the addition of SEP. It was found that the compatibilizing efficiency of block copolymer used is strongly dependent on the chemical structure of rubber block, molecular weight of block copolymer molecule, and its concentration. The SEP diblock copolymer proved to be a superior compatibilizer over SBS and SEBS triblock copolymers. Low‐molecular weight SEBS appeared to be a more efficient compatibilizer in PP/PS blend than high‐molecular weight SEBS. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 72: 291–307, 1999     

Effect of maleated polypropylene and impact modifiers on the morphology and mechanical properties of PP/Mica composites

Composites of polypropylene (PP) with mica powder and impact modifiers were produced by internal mixer. A major drawback in the use of mica‐filled PP is its low impact resistance. In the present study, the effect of the maleated PP (MAPP) and impact modifiers was evaluated on the composite properties separately and together. Thus, two different styrene‐ethylene/butylene‐styrene triblock copolymers (SEBS) and one ethylene‐propylene‐diene terpolymer (EPDM) have been used as impact modifiers in the PP‐mica composites. Addition of MAPP had a negative effect on the composite notched impact strength and elongation at break but had a positive effect on tensile strength when used together with impact modifiers. All three elastomers increased the impact strength of the PP‐mica composites but the addition of maleated SEBS (SEBS‐MA) granted the greatest improvement in impact strength. It was inferred from the scanning electron microscopy that SEBS‐MA had a stronger interaction with mica surface than the other impact modifiers. POLYM. COMPOS., 27:614–620, 2006. © 2006 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Dynamic mechanical properties of SBR and EPDM vulcanisates filled with cryogenically pulverized flexible polyurethane foam particles

The dynamic mechanical properties of rubber vulcanisates filled with cryogenically pulverized polyurethane foam particles, used as a reinforcing filler, were investigated with respect to storage modulus (E′), loss modulus, and the variation of glass transition temperature. Two rubbers were using styrene–butadiene rubber (SBR) and ethylene–propylene copolymer (EPDM). The effects of filler concentration and filler characteristics (such as particle size and moisture content) were also monitored. It was found that the optimum dynamic mechanical properties of the compounds were obtained when introducing the PU particles of 40–50 parts per hundred (pph) rubber in the SBR and 30 pph in the EPDM, the properties being affected by the size of PU particles and moisture content. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 74: 1129–1139, 1999     

Melt rheology and interfacial properties of binary and ternary blends of PS,EOC, and SEBS

This works systematically investigates the interfacial properties of the binary and the ternary blends based on polystyrene (PS), ethylene octene copolymer (EOC), and styrene–ethylene–butylene–styrene (SEBS) by analyzing the melt linear rheological behavior of the blends and neat components. Moreover, the relationship between rheology, phase morphology, and mechanical properties of PS/EOC ternary blends with various quantities of SEBS were studied. The surface shear modulus (β) and interfacial tension values obtained by Palierne model indicated that the EOC/SEBS blend has the best interfacial properties, while the lowest interaction was found for PS/EOC blend. Based on the Palierne model and Harkin's spreading coefficients a core–shell type morphology with EOC phase encapsulated by the SEBS shell dispersed in the PS matrix was determined for the ternary blends. Scanning electron microscopy results revealed that both fibrillar and droplet forms of dispersed phase could be developed during the blending of PS and EOC in presence of SEBS. The extent of fibrillar morphology and interfacial interactions in PS/EOC/SEBS ternary blends was dependent on the SEBS content. The improvement of the mechanical properties of PS/EOC blends in the presence of SEBS was evidenced by the tensile and impact resistance experiments. The tensile strength reinforcement was more pronounced for the ternary blends with more fibrillar dispersed phase. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2020 , 137, 48791.     

Toughening study of fire‐retardant high‐impact polystyrene

Fire‐retardant high‐impact polystyrene (HIPS) was modified by melt blending with varying amounts of three types of tougheners. The effects of the tougheners on the properties of the fire‐retardant HIPS were studied by mechanical, combustion tests, and thermogravimetric analysis. The morphologies of fracture surfaces and char layers were characterized through scanning electron microscopy. The results show that the impact properties of styrene–butadiene–styrene (SBS)‐containing composites were better than those of ethylene–propylene–diene monomer (EPDM)‐containing or ethylene–vinyl acetate copolymer (EVA)‐containing composites. The tensile strength and flexural modulus of the fire‐retardant HIPS decreased evidently with the addition of tougheners. It is found that the compatibility between SBS copolymer and HIPS matrix was best among the three types of tougheners. The addition of SBS had little influence on the thermal property, residue, flammability, and morphology of char layer of the fire‐retardant HIPS, but the addition of EPDM rubber or EVA brought adverse influence on the residue, flammability, and morphology of char layer of the fire‐retardant HIPS, especially for EPDM. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Artificial aging of polymer modified bitumens

This paper presents an investigation of artificial aging of polymer modified binders, prepared from three base bitumens and six polymers. Aging of the binders was performed using the Thin Film Oven Test (TFOT), the Rolling Thin Film Oven Test (RTFOT), and modified RTFOT (MRTFOT). The binders were characterized by means of infrared spectroscopy, different types of chromatography, and dynamic mechanical analysis. It was found that the effect of aging on the chemistry and rheology of the modified binders was influenced by the nature of the base bitumens and was strongly dependent on the characteristics of the polymers. For styrene–butadiene–styrene (SBS) and styrene–ethylene–butylene–styrene (SEBS) modified binders, aging decreased the complex modulus and increased the phase angle. Aging also increased the temperature susceptibility of these modified binders. The rheological changes of SBS modified bitumens were attributed to polymer degradation and bitumen oxidation. However, for SEBS modified bitumens, the mechanisms of aging are unclear. In the case of ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) and ethylene butyl acrylate (EBA) modified binders, the process of aging increased the complex modulus and elastic response (decreased phase angle), and reduced temperature susceptibility. These changes were mainly due to the oxidative hardening of the base bitumens. The study also showed statistically significant correlation between TFOT, RTFOT, and MRTFOT. However, no definite conclusions could be drawn regarding the difference in severity of aging between these methods. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 76: 1811–1824, 2000