Sequence of a 42-kb mouse region containing the imprinted H19 locus: identification of a novel muscle-specific transcription unit showing biallelic expression

We have followed four patients with Bartter syndrome for a mean of 25.4 years (range 21.5-28.8 years) after diagnosis. All patients received non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID). In all patients, various degrees of renal dysfunction were noted to be temporally associated with NSAID therapy. In two patients, renal dysfunction resolved after discontinuing NSAID therapy, while maintaining other chronic medications such as potassium-sparing diuretics. Renal dysfunction persisted after NSAID withdrawal in two patients. We report these cases as a warning that NSAID should be considered an important cause of either reversible or irreversible renal dysfunction in Bartter syndrome.     

Efficacy and safety of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs for cancer pain: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy and safety of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in the treatment of cancer pain by meta-analyses of the published randomized control trials (RCTs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-five studies met inclusion criteria for analysis. Of these, 13 tested a single-dose effect, nine multiple-dose effects, and three both single- and multiple-dose effects of 16 different NSAIDs in a total of 1,545 patients. Baseline pain intensity (when provided) of moderate or higher was indicated in 81% of patients. RESULTS: Single-dose NSAID studies found greater analgesic efficacy than placebo, with rough equivalence to 5 to 10 mg of intramuscular morphine. Pain scores differed insignificantly for aspirin versus three other NSAIDs. Analgesic responses to low- and high-dose NSAIDs suggested a dose-response relationship, but this was not statistically significant. Recommended and supramaximal single doses of three NSAIDs produced comparable changes in pain scores, which indicates a ceiling analgesic effect. Common side effects included upper gastrointestinal symptoms, dizziness, and drowsiness. The incidence of side effects showed a trend to increase with dose, without a ceiling effect, and to increase with multiple doses. Single or multiple doses of weak opioids (WO) alone or in combination (WO/C) with nonopioid analgesics did not produce greater analgesia than NSAIDs alone. Single doses of WO/C analgesics produced more side effects than NSAIDs alone, although both side effect incidence and patient dropout rates were equal when multiple doses were administered. CONCLUSION: These findings question whether the traditional World Health Organization (WHO) second analgesic step (addition of a weak opioid when pain is inadequately treated by a nonopioid analgesic alone) is warranted. A lack of comparable studies precluded testing the hypothesis that NSAIDs are particularly effective for malignant bone pain.     

Gastric erosions induced by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: clinical significance, pathogenesis, and therapeutic perspectives

The development of ulceration and ulcer complications by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is now well established. Gastric erosions occur in about 60% of patients receiving long-term NSAID therapy. Many clinicians consider such erosions benign in nature and not requiring therapeutic intervention. Recent evidence, however, indicates that gastric erosions predispose rheumatic patients to frank ulcerations and ulcer complications. This brief overview summarizes the clinical dilemma in the diagnosis and treatment of NSAID-induced gastric erosions. Current data suggest that misoprostol has important therapeutic benefits for the treatment and prevention of gastric erosions in patients receiving long-term NSAID therapy.     

Improving the gastrointestinal safety of NSAIDs: the development of misoprostol--from hypothesis to clinical practice

Arthritis is a major source of disability for the American population. It results in significant morbidity for the millions of patients affected and costs billions of dollars yearly for diagnosis and management. Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the principal therapy for the majority of arthritis patients. It has been estimated that more than 15 million people with arthritis take these drugs daily. This use is predicted to increase greatly not only as a result of an aging population, with the consequent increase in the prevalence of arthritis, but also because NSAIDs may prove to have a role in decreasing colonic neoplasia and in reducing the likelihood of conditions such as Alzheimer's disease. It is therefore increasingly important to understand the nature of the side effects associated with these agents as well as ways of decreasing or preventing their occurrence. NSAIDs inhibit the enzymes cyclooxygenase-1 and cyclooxygenase-2. This reduces the synthesis of prostaglandins and therefore decreases joint inflammation, but it may also lead to the development of gastric and duodenal ulcers. For this reason, exogenous prostaglandins have been studied for their potential role in preventing NSAID-associated ulcers and ulcer complications. This paper reviews the development of the prostaglandin E1 analog misoprostol, the theory behind its use as a mucosal protective agent, and the results of studies in animals as well as in normal volunteers and patients with arthritis. Ultimately, a study was performed to evaluate whether misoprostol reduces the incidence of serious ulcer complications in patients taking NSAIDs. It is an interesting story, which promises to be of increasing importance as NSAID use expands to new indications while concern remains about their associated complications, especially those related to the gastrointestinal tract.     

A meta-analysis of the effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on blood pressure

BACKGROUND: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have well-known gastrointestinal and renal toxic reactions. Effects of NSAIDs on blood pressure are less appreciated. A meta-analysis was performed to determine the hypertensive effects of NSAIDs and rank them by magnitude of change in mean arterial pressure (MAP). METHODS: A literature search of published English-language studies of NSAIDs and their effects on blood pressure was done. Studies were included if they met the following criteria: (1) the studies were intervention studies; (2) NSAIDs at any dose or aspirin at doses of 1.5 g/d or greater were included; (3) documentation of blood pressure was provided; and (4) the studies were 24 hours in duration. Studies were excluded if 20% or more of their participants dropped out or if the dose of antihypertensive drugs was adjusted while the subjects were taking NSAIDs. The major outcome was change in MAP while patients were receiving NSAIDs. Each NSAID arm was extracted from its trial. Information on possible confounders, including subject age, trial quality, amount of dietary salt intake, and whether study subjects were hypertensive or normotensive, was recorded. We calculated the average change in MAP on each NSAID, adjusting for confounders. RESULTS: Fifty-four studies with 123 NSAID treatment arms met inclusion criteria. The mean age of subjects was 46 years. Of the 1324 participants, 1213 subjects (92%) were hypertensive. The effects of NSAIDs on blood pressure were found solely in hypertensive subjects. Among these, the increase in MAP after adjusting for amount of dietary salt intake was 3.59 mm Hg for indomethacin (57 treatment arms), 374 mm Hg for naproxen (four arms), and 0.49 mm Hg for piroxicam (four arms). The MAP decreased by 2.59 mm Hg for placebo (10 arms), 0.83 mm Hg for ibuprofen (six arms), 1.76 mm Hg for aspirin (four arms), and 0.16 mm Hg for sulindac (23 arms). The effects on MAP by using placebo, sulindac, and aspirin were statistically significantly different from indomethacin. CONCLUSIONS: In short-term use, NSAIDs vary considerably in their effect on blood pressure. Of the drugs studied, indomethacin and naproxen were associated with the largest increases in blood pressure. The average effects of piroxicam, aspirin, ibuprofen, and sulindac were negligible.     

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and corticosteroids for the management of canine osteoarthritis

Anti-inflammatory medications have long been prescribed for relief of the pain and discomfort associated with OA. This occurs despite the recognized side effects associated with use of NSAIDs and corticosteroids. Available evidence suggests that NSAIDs provide this relief through a combination of central and peripheral actions. Recent discovery of two isoforms of cyclooxygenase has increased our understanding of NSAID activity and may result in identification of drugs that potentially will have fewer side effects. A review of NSAIDs used in veterinary medicine indicates that relatively little is known regarding their role in treating OA, although controlled studies involving carprofen and etodolac have increased our knowledge of the efficacy of specific NSAIDs used for this purpose.     

New non-steroidal anti-rheumatic drugs: selective inhibitors of inducible cyclooxygenase

MODE OF ACTION OF NON-STEROIDAL ANTI-INFLAMMATORY DRUGS: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) exert their major therapeutic and adverse effects by inhibition of prostanoid synthesis. Also the interactions with antihypertensive drugs and lithium are caused by this mechanism of action. Cyclooxygenation is a key enzymatic step in the synthesis of prostanoids. 1990 2 isoforms of the enzyme cyclooxygenase have been identified: Prostanoids synthesized by the constitutive cyclooxygenase (COX-1) are involved in physiological homeostasis. In contrast, the inducible cyclooxygenase (COX-2) produces large amounts of prostanoids, mainly contributing to the pathophysiological process of inflammation. COX-2 SELECTIVE NSAID: The discovery of the cyclooxgenase-isoenzymes ushered in a new generation of NSAID: A drug with selectivity for COX-2 would inhibit proinflammatory prostanoid synthesis while sparing physiologic prostanoid synthesis. Thus, a selective COX-2 inhibitor should be anti-inflammatory with less or no gastrointestinal or other NSAID-typical adverse effects. The experiences with currently used NSAID, which show an increasing incidence of side effects as COX-1 inhibition increases, and studies with the COX-2 selective NSAID salsalate and meloxicam, which have less adverse effects than nonselective COX inhibitors in equivalent antiphlogistic dosage, prove the concept of selective COX-2 inhibition to avoid the NSAID typical side effects. Newly developed drugs with a very high selectivity for COX-2 are now tested in clinical trials. CONCLUSION: So far the results suggest, that selective and highly selective COX-2 inhibitors have significantly fewer gastrointestinal and renal adverse effects and do not inhibit platelet aggregation.     

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-associated upper gastrointestinal lesions in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Relationships to gastric histology, Helicobacter pylori infection, and other risk factors for peptic ulcer

BACKGROUND: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are risk factors for peptic ulcer in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, but the contribution of reactive gastritis, concomitant Helicobacter pylori infection, or RA activity to NSAID ulcer pathogenesis is unknown. METHODS: Ninety-six RA patients taking NSAIDs and dyspeptic sex- and age-matched control patients without NSAID use or an RA diagnosis were enrolled in the study. RESULTS: Gastric ulcer (GU) was detected in 29 (30%) RA patients and 3 control patients (P < 0.001). Sixteen RA patients and no control patient had an H. pylori-negative GU. The GUs of the RA patients were mainly located in the prepyloric region (28%) and antrum (62%). Nine of the 29 RA patients (31%) with GU had more than 1 ulcer. Erosive gastropathy was detected in 34 (71% H. pylori-negative) RA patients and in 13 (62% H. pylori-negative) control subjects (P < 0.001). Chronic gastritis was observed in 65 RA patients (48% H. pylori-negative) and in 58 control subjects (43% H. pylori-negative) (NS). whereas reactive gastritis was found in only 2 RA patients and in none of the controls. Corticosteroid use was the only independent risk factor for GU: odds ratio was 6.8 (95% confidence interval, 1.3-36.0). The prevalences of duodenal ulcer or esophagitis were not increased in RA patients. CONCLUSIONS: RA patients using NSAIDs continuously are at a greatly increased risk of developing both H. pylori-negative and -positive GUs, and corticosteroid use is an independent risk factor for ulcer development. Most RA patients have chronic gastritis, whereas reactive gastritis is rarely associated with continuous NSAID use in RA patients.     

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and bone mineral density in older women: the Rancho Bernardo study

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are known to inhibit synthesis of prostaglandins and may help prevent bone loss, but no study has shown the differential association of type or dose of NSAID compound with bone mineral density (BMD). The purpose of this study was to determine the relation of NSAIDs by type and dose to BMD. Participants were 932 Caucasian, community-dwelling women aged 44-98 years from southern California. Data were collected from 1988 to 1991 through the use of standardized medical questionnaires. Medication use was validated by a nurse. BMD at the ultradistal and midshaft radii were measured using single-photon absorptiometry, and at the hip and lumbar spine using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Women (mean age, 72 years) were classified into 818 nonusers and 114 regular daily users of NSAIDs, of which 84 used propionic acid NSAIDs and the remainder used acetic acid NSAIDs. Occasional NSAID users were excluded. Women who used propionic acid NSAIDs, but not acetic acid NSAIDs, had higher BMD at all five sites and significantly higher BMD at the midshaft radius and lumbar spine. These differences remained after controlling for known covariates of osteoporosis. When women with self-reported osteoarthritis were excluded from the model, significantly higher BMD in propionic acid NSAID users was also observed at the femoral neck and total hip. Those who concurrently used estrogen and propionic acid NSAIDs had the highest BMD at all sites, suggesting an additive effect. We conclude that regular daily use of propionic acid NSAIDs, with or without simultaneous use of estrogen, may be helpful in preventing bone loss in older women. However, further research is needed to confirm these results before any clinical practice guidelines can be recommended due to the increased risk of serious complications associated with NSAID use.     

NSAID-induced ulcers--therapy and prevention

There is a lot of epidemiological information to calculate the risk of developing gastroduodenal lesions during NSAID therapy on a reliable base in an individual patient. In treating NSAID ulcers one has to decide whether the antirheumatic treatment can be stopped or whether one has to continue. In the first mentioned condition all antiulcer drugs can be used safely like in chronic recurrent ulcer disease. However, when NSAID therapy has to be continued proton pump inhibitors are necessary in doubled therapeutic dosage. Prophylaxis should not be made in all patients on NSAIDs, but is only indicated with convincing cost-benefit ratio in high-risk patients. Whereas H2-blockers and proton pump inhibitors seem to protect mainly the duodenal mucosa oral prostaglandins (Misoprostol) are effective in the stomach as well.     

Renal side effects of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors

Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are used widely in the treatment of hypertension and congestive heart failure. An increasing number of patients with chronic renal failure is treated with ACE inhibitors because of their antiproteinuric effect. In patients with diabetic nephropathy ACE inhibitors also slow the progression of renal failure. Direct drug related nephrotoxic effects, like the induction of proteinuria, glucosuria or an interstitial nephritis are rare events. The often observed reduction of the glomerular filtration rate after the induction of an ACE inhibitor therapy is due to the specific intrarenal action of these agents and therefore not an adverse drug reaction.     

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents: potential modifiers of periodontal disease progression

The most recent studies of NSAIDs as potential modifiers of periodontal disease progression are reviewed. These studies indicate that NSAIDs have the ability to alter or control the progression of periodontal disease. Reductions in gingival inflammation and in bone loss have been observed following the administration of various NSAIDs. In some cases, bone gain has been achieved. More research is required to determine the possible long-term side effects associated with the chronic usage of NSAIDs, as well as to achieve consensus on the most effective drug for the control of periodontal disease. Until this occurs, and this application of NSAIDs receives government approval, the use of these drugs to control periodontal disease is not recommended.     

Ketorolac. A reappraisal of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use in pain management

Ketorolac is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) with strong analgesic activity. The analgesic efficacy of ketorolac has been extensively evaluated in the postoperative setting, in both hospital inpatients and outpatients, and in patients with various other acute pain states. After major abdominal, orthopaedic or gynaecological surgery or ambulatory laparoscopic or gynaecological procedures, ketorolac provides relief from mild to severe pain in the majority of patients and has similar analgesic efficacy to that of standard dosages of morphine and pethidine (meperidine) as well as less frequently used opioids and other NSAIDs. The analgesic effect of ketorolac may be slightly delayed but often persists for longer than that of opioids. Combined therapy with ketorolac and an opioid results in a 25 to 50% reduction in opioid requirements, and in some patients this is accompanied by a concomitant decrease in opioid-induced adverse events, more rapid return to normal gastrointestinal function and shorter stay in hospital. In children undergoing myringotomy, hernia repair, tonsillectomy, or other surgery associated with mild to moderate pain, ketorolac provides comparable analgesia to morphine, pethidine or paracetamol (acetaminophen). In the emergency department, ketorolac attenuates moderate to severe pain in patients with renal colic, migraine headache, musculoskeletal pain or sickle cell crisis and is usually as effective as frequently used opioids, such as morphine and pethidine, and other NSAIDs and analgesics. Subcutaneous administration of ketorolac reduces pain in patients with cancer and seems particularly beneficial in pain resulting from bone metastases. The acquisition cost of ketorolac is greater than that of morphine or pethidine; however, in a small number of studies, the higher cost of ketorolac was offset when treatment with ketorolac resulted in a reduced hospital stay compared with alternative opioid therapy. The tolerability profile of ketorolac parallels that of other NSAIDs; most clinically important adverse events affect the gastrointestinal tract and/or renal or haematological function. The incidence of serious or fatal adverse events reported with ketorolac has decreased since revision of dosage guidelines. Results from a large retrospective postmarketing surveillance study in more than 20,000 patients demonstrated that the overall risk of gastrointestinal or operative site bleeding related to parenteral ketorolac therapy was only slightly higher than with opioids. However, the risk increased markedly when high dosages were used for more than 5 days, especially in the elderly. Acute renal failure may occur after treatment with ketorolac but is usually reversible on drug discontinuation. In common with other NSAIDs, ketorolac has also been implicated in allergic or hypersensitivity reactions. In summary, ketorolac is a strong analgesic with a tolerability profile which resembles that of other NSAIDs. When used in accordance with current dosage guidelines, this drug provides a useful alternative, or adjuvant, to opioids in patients with moderate to severe pain.     

Association of cocaine and methamphetamine use with giant gastroduodenal ulcers

OBJECTIVES: Giant gastric and duodenal ulcers (>2-3 cm in greatest dimension) are reported to have higher rates of complication and mortality and to be associated with increasing age, renal failure, and use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). This study investigated the outcome and associations of gastric and duodenal ulcers >2.5 cm compared to ulcers of lesser size. METHODS: Records from all patients with gastric and duodenal ulcers >0.5 cm diagnosed by upper endoscopy between January 1994 and September 1995 were studied for evidence of concurrent use of aspirin, NSAIDs, methamphetamine, and cocaine, as well as for transfusion requirements, length of hospital stay, mortality, surgery, rebleeding, Helicobacter pylori infection, and malignancy. RESULTS: A logistic regression analysis of the 220 patients identified revealed that recent methamphetamine and/or cocaine use was significantly predictive of giant ulcer formation (p = 0.0002) with an odds ratio of 9.66. Also significant was younger age (p = 0.026) and aspirin or NSAID use (p = 0.046). H. pylori infection was significant only for giant gastric ulcers (p = 0.031). Ulcer size did not predict mortality, rate of rebleeding, requirement for surgery, transfusion requirements, or length of hospital stay. However, giant gastric ulcers were significantly more likely to be malignant (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Giant gastric and duodenal ulcers were strongly associated with stimulant abuse. They were also associated with younger age and use of aspirin or NSAIDs. Additionally, giant gastric ulcers were associated with malignancy and H. pylori infection. Ulcer size did not predict rate of complications or outcome.     

Strychnine-insensitive [3H] glycine binding to synaptosomal membranes from the chick retina

PURPOSE: Both isoforms of cyclo-oxygenase, COX-1 and COX-2, are inhibited to varying degrees by all of the available nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Because inhibition of COX-1 by NSAIDs is linked to gastrointestinal ulcer formation, those drugs that selectively inhibit COX-2 may have less gastrointestinal toxicity. We measured the extent to which NSAIDs and other anti-inflammatory or analgesic drugs inhibit COX-1 and COX-2 in humans. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Aliquots of whole blood from 16 healthy volunteers were incubated ex vivo with 25 antiinflammatory or analgesic drugs at six concentrations ranging from 0 (control) to 100 microM (n = 5 for each). Blood was assayed for serum-generated thromboxane B2 synthesis (COX-1 assay) and for lipopolysaccharide-stimulated prostaglandin E2 synthesis (COX-2 assay). In addition, gastric biopsies from the same volunteers were incubated with each drug ex vivo and mucosal prostaglandin E2 synthesis measured. RESULTS: Inhibitory potency and selectivity of NSAIDs for COX-1 and COX-2 activity in blood varied greatly. Some NSAIDs (eg, flurbiprofen, ketoprofen) were COX-1 selective, some (eg, ibuprofen, naproxen) were essentially nonselective, while others (eg, diclofenac, mefenamic acid) were COX-2 selective. Inhibitory effects of NSAIDs on gastric prostaglandin E2 synthesis correlated with COX-1 inhibitory potency in blood (P < 0.001) and with COX-1 selectivity (P < 0.01), but not with COX-2 inhibitory potency. Even COX-2 "selective" NSAIDs still had sufficient COX-1 activity to cause potent inhibitory effects on gastric prostaglandin E2 synthesis at concentrations achieved in vivo. CONCLUSION: No currently marketed NSAID, even those that are COX-2 selective, spare gastric COX activity at therapeutic concentrations. Thus, all NSAIDs should be used cautiously until safer agents are developed.     

Polyamine-enhanced NMDA receptor activity: effect of ethanol

Gastrointestinal symptoms and lesions are often associated with the clinical use of non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). An open-label, single arm multicenter Italian study evaluated if misoprostol, a prostaglandin E1 analogue with gastroduodenal mucosal protective activity, was effective in the prevention and treatment of NSAID-induced gastroduodenal lesions. Patients affected by rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or osteoarthritis (OA), in treatment with NSAIDs and suffering from gastric symptoms or gastroduodenal lesions related to NSAID use, were admitted to the study. Gastrointestinal and arthritic symptoms were assessed before and after 4 weeks co-administration of an NSAID (the most frequent was diclofenac, used in 35% of the RA and in 22% of the OA patients, followed by piroxicam and tenoxicam respectively) + misoprostol (200 mcg two times daily in 58% of the cases, 200 mcg three times daily in 39%, 200 mcg four times daily in 3%). On admission and after 4 weeks of therapy a gastrointestinal endoscopy was performed to evaluate the condition of the gastroduodenal mucosa. Final results showed that: (i) NSAID-related gastric lesions were more frequent than duodenal lesions; (ii) when patients were given misoprostol and NSAIDs, 96% of them did not develop gastric lesions and 97% did not develop duodenal lesions; (iii) even when NSAID therapy was continued, gastric or duodenal lesions induced by NSAIDs healed or in any case did not worsen in 92% and 91% respectively of the cases; (iv) during the period of coadministration of NSAIDs+misoprostol, NSAID-related UGI symptoms disappeared or improved in 77% of the cases.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Epidermoid carcinoma of the esophagus in caustic esophageal stenosis

A prospective study of the effectiveness of the topical application of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) as a gel preparation was carried out in 26 women with severe breast pain. The results showed a satisfactory relief of pain in 81% of the women: 11 of 13 with cyclical pain, eight of 11 with non-cyclical pain, and in two women with severe scar pain after lumpectomy and radiotherapy. Topical NSAID gel was applied as required; the relief of severe pain was rapid and no side effects were reported. These factors compare favourably with established recommended treatments which usually involve months of continuous treatment, tailoring of drug dosages and a significant incidence of intolerable side effects. This study has shown that topical NSAID application is an effective, safe, acceptable and easily administered treatment for severe cyclical and non-cyclical breast pain.