Enhanced myelotoxicity due to granulocyte colony-stimulating factor administration until 48 hours before the next chemotherapy course in patients with small-cell lung carcinoma

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) priming on peripheral-blood cell counts during standard-dose chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twelve patients with relapsed small-cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) were treated with two chemotherapy courses. Six patients received G-CSF priming only before the first course (group A) and the other six patients only before the second course (group B). Each patient served as his own control. Patients were treated with cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and etoposide (CEE), or with vincristine, ifosfamide, mesna, and carboplatin (VIMP) every 4 weeks. G-CSF was administered subcutaneously 5 microg/kg/d for 6 days until 48 hours before the first or second chemotherapy course. RESULTS: Priming caused a lowering of the WBC nadir, with a median value of 0.95 x 10(9)/L (P = .004), and of absolute neutrophil nadir, with a median value of 0.48 x 10(9)/L (P = .03). There was a trend for a lower platelet (PLT) nadir after G-CSF priming (P = .09). G-CSF priming resulted in a prolonged duration of WBC count less than 3.0 x 10(9)/L of +4.25 days (P = .04), and of WBC count less than 1.0 x 10(9)/L of +0.50 days (P = .03). The duration of neutropenia less than 0.5 x 10(9)/L seemed longer in primed courses (+3.75 days, P = .18). The duration of PLT counts less than 100 x 10(9)/L was prolonged by 1.5 days (P = .04). Hemoglobin (Hgb) levels were not influenced by G-CSF priming. CONCLUSION: G-CSF administration until 48 hours before the next chemotherapy course increases chemotherapy-associated leukocytopenia and thrombocytopenia. This may be of special concern when G-CSF is administered during dose-densified chemotherapy.     

Evaluation and comparison of three mobilization methods for the collection of granulocytes

BACKGROUND: Cancer chemotherapeutic regimens have become more potent and myeloablative. As a consequence, morbidity and mortality due to opportunistic infections have become a major challenge. The provision of adequate doses of viable granulocytes has thus become an important approach for circumventing the problem. A schedule for collecting therapeutic numbers of cells with minimal donor toxicity has yet to be established. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: An investigation of three mobilization schedules for the collection of granulocytes for transfusion--granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) 5 micrograms per kg daily; G-CSF 5 micrograms per kg every other day, and prednisone 60 mg given orally (20 mg doses at 17 hours, 12 hours, and 2 hours before the collection). RESULTS: A total of 464 apheresis procedures involving 163 healthy donors were analyzed. Prednisone caused a small increase in the white cell (WBC) counts over the collection days, while G-CSF every other day and daily schedules improved WBC counts to 145 and 160 percent, respectively (p = 0.004). Similarly, administration of G-CSF daily and every other day mobilized higher yields of granulocytes over the collection days, compared to the prednisone schedule (170% and 180% vs. 105%; p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Compared with prednisone, higher WBC yields were achieved by G-CSF stimulation; G-CSF given every other day is as effective as daily G-CSF administration for the recruitment of granulocytes, which makes the mobilization procedure more cost-effective.     

The toxicity of radiotherapy following high-dose chemotherapy with peripheral blood stem cell support in high-risk breast cancer: a preliminary analysis

High-dose chemotherapy with autologous bone marrow and/or peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) support is increasingly employed in the adjuvant treatment of high-risk breast cancer. Subsequent radiotherapy has been reported to be associated with morbidity and mortality resulting from pulmonary toxicity. In addition, the course of radiation therapy may be hampered by excess myelosuppression. The aim of this study was to investigate the contribution to radiation-induced toxicity of a high-dose chemotherapy regimen (CTC) that incorporates cyclophosphamide, thiotepa and carboplatin, in patients with high-risk breast cancer. In two randomised single institution studies, 70 consecutive patients received anthracycline-containing adjuvant chemotherapy (FEC: 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide) followed by radiotherapy to achieve maximal local control. Of these patients, 34 received high-dose CTC with autologous PBSC support. All patients tolerated the full radiation dose in the planned time schedule. Radiation pneumonitis was observed in 5 patients (7%), 4 of whom had undergone high-dose chemotherapy (P = 0.38). All 5 responded favourably to prednisone. Fatal toxicities were not observed. Myelosuppression did not require interruption or untimely discontinuation of the radiotherapy, although significant reductions in median nadir platelet counts and haemoglobin levels were observed in patients who had received high-dose chemotherapy (P = 0.0001). The median nadir of WBC counts was mildly but significantly decreased during radiotherapy (P = 0.01). Red blood cell or platelet transfusions were rarely indicated. Adequate radiotherapy for breast cancer can be safely administered after high-dose CTC with autologous PBSC support. Radiation-induced myelotoxicity is clearly enhanced following CTC, but this is of little clinical significance. Radiation pneumonitis after high-dose therapy may occur more often in patients with a history of lung disease or after a relatively high radiation dose to the chest wall. Other high-dose regimens, particularly those incorporating drugs with known pulmonary toxicity (such as BCNU), may predispose patients to radiation pneumonitis.     

Biventricular repair in neonates with hypoplastic left heart complex

PURPOSE: We previously developed an inpatient regimen that consisted of infusional fluorouracil (5-FU), epirubicin, and cisplatin (ECisF), with a response rate of 86% in advanced breast cancer. The current phase II 2:1 randomized study investigated whether cyclophosphamide can be substituted for cisplatin (ECycloF) to reduce toxicity and allow the regimen to be administered on an outpatient basis without loss of efficacy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ninety-six women (median age, 49 years; range, 28 to 73) with breast cancer (59 metastatic, 37 locally advanced) received continuous infusional 5-FU (200 mg/m2/d via Hickman line) and six cycles of epirubicin (60 mg/m2 every 21 days) with either cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 every 21 days (38 metastatic, 24 locally advanced) or cisplatin 60 mg/m2 every 21 days (21 metastatic, 13 locally advanced). There were no significant differences in patient characteristics between these groups. RESULTS: ECycloF was better tolerated than ECisF in terms of lethargy (P = .005), stomatitis (P = .008), plantar palmar erythema (P = .02), constipation (P < .001), thrombosis (P = .0014), and nausea and vomiting (P = .05). Although there was a trend toward more anemia and leukopenia with ECisF (P =. 1), there was no significant difference in the rates of infection. Efficacy was comparable in terms of overall response (69% v 68%), complete response (CR; 13% v 15%), and median progression-free survival (9 v 8 months). CONCLUSION: ECycloF is an outpatient regimen with a lower incidence of severe nonhematologic toxicity than inpatient ECisF; it has comparable efficacy and is considerably more economical.     

Loss of biological activity due to Glu-->Arg mutation at residue 11 of the B subunit of cholera toxin

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose, toxicities, and potential antitumor activity of edatrexate (E), an antifolate agent with enhanced in vitro antitumor activity as compared with methotrexate (M), when given in combination with vinblastine, doxorubicin, cisplatin, and filgrastim (G-CSF) to patients with advanced malignancies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-seven patients with advanced malignancies were treated with escalating doses of edatrexate in combination with vinblastine (V), doxorubicin (A), cisplatin (C), and filgrastim (EVAC/G-CSF) following three different subsequently developed schedules. Schedule 1 was patterned after the MVAC regimen, a combination chemotherapy program with activity against different epithelial malignancies, and consisted of E, 40 mg/m2/day, days 1/15/22; V, 3 mg/m2/day, days 2/15/22; A, 30 mg/m2/ day, day 2; C, 70 mg/m2/day, day 2; repeated every 28 days. Schedules 2 and 3 were designed to avoid observed dose-limiting toxicity on schedule 1 consisting of transient elevation of serum creatinine levels and delayed myelosuppression. Schedule 2 consisted of E, 40 or 60 mg/ m2/day, days 1 and 15; V, 3 mg/m2/day, days 2 and 15; A, 30 mg/m2/day, day 2; C, 30 mg/m2/day, days 1 and 2; cycled every 28 days. Schedule 3 consisted of E, 60 to 120 mg/m2/day, day 1; V, 3 mg/m2/day, day 2; A, 30 mg/m2/day, day 2; C, 30 mg/m2/day, days 1 and 2; cycled every 21 days. Filgrastim 5 micrograms/kg/day was given to all patients subcutaneously until the absolute neutrophil count was greater than 10,000/microL postnadir. Three patients were treated on schedule 1, 10 on schedule 2 (four at an E dose of 40 mg/m2/day and six at an E dose of 60 mg/m2/day), and 24 on schedule 3 (six at each of the following E dosages: 60, 80, 100, and 120 mg/m2/day). RESULTS: Dose-limiting toxicities of grade 3 to 4 leukopenia and transient elevation of serum creatinine values were observed in two of three patients treated on schedule 1. A dose-limiting toxicity of grade 3 to 4 leukopenia was noted in two of six patients treated on schedule 2 at an edatrexate dose of 60 mg/m2/day. Two of six patients treated on schedule 3 at an edatrexate dose of 120 mg/m2/day had a dose-limiting toxicity of grade 3 stomatitis (one patient) and grade 3 cytopenia (one patient). Nineteen of 37 patients with evaluable or measurable disease had a response to treatment (response rate 51%, 95% confidence intervals = 35%-67%). Nine of 15 patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer responded, including one complete remission (response rate 60%, confidence intervals = 35%-85%). A median survival of 517 days (confidence interval = 163-808 days) and a 1-year survival rate of 60% (confidence interval = 35%-85%) was seen in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. CONCLUSIONS: The maximum tolerated dose and the recommended phase II dose of edatrexate is 100 mg/m2/day when administered as part of the EVAC/G-CSF program following schedule 3. Promising antineoplastic activity against non-small cell lung carcinomas was observed, and a phase II study is planned.     

Phase I/II trial of dexverapamil, epirubicin, and granulocyte-macrophage-colony stimulating factor in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of a cytotoxic regimen consisting of the second-generation chemosensitizer dexverapamil (DVPM), high dose epirubicin, and recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) in pancreatic carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight previously untreated patients with locally advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas were studied. Treatment consisted of oral DVPM at a dose of 1000-1200 mg/day for 3 days, epirubicin administered as an intravenous bolus injection on Day 2 with an initial dose of 90 mg/m2, and a dose of GM-CSF of 400 micrograms administered subcutaneously from Day 5s through 14. Epirubicin dose escalation levels were 90, 105, 120 and 135 mg/m2. Consecutive cohorts of four to eight patients were planned at each dose level. Treatment cycles were repeated every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Hematologic toxicity, specifically granulocytopenia, constituted the dose-limiting toxicity with an MTD of 120 mg/m2 for epirubicin. Despite routine supportive therapy with GM-CSF, four, two, and five patients experienced Grade 4 granulocytopenia during their first two treatment courses at levels 105, 120, and 135 mg/m2, respectively. Grade 4 granulocytopenia was observed in two, three, and one additional patients during subsequent courses with these levels. Nonhematologic toxicity was uncommon, generally modest, and did not correlate clearly with the anthracycline dose. Dexverapamil-related cardiovascular symptoms occurred frequently, but they never resulted in serious toxicity requiring active medical intervention or permanent discontinuation of therapy. Nine of 28 patients achieved partial responses to this therapy. Stable disease was observed in nine patients, and tumor progress occurred in 10. CONCLUSION: The MTD of epirubicin for this regimen with DVPM and GM-CSF was 120 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. Though it remains uncertain whether the encouraging response activity observed in this disease-oriented Phase I study was, in fact, due to successful modulation of multidrug resistance, these results suggest that this regimen is likely to be an effective and tolerable treatment strategy for patients with pancreatic cancer, which should be evaluated further.     

Efficiency of high-dose FEC chemotherapy for the mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells into peripheral blood

The best regimen for mobilizing hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) into peripheral blood is not yet defined. The efficiency of FEC chemotherapy in the treatment of breast cancer is well established and the effects of FEC on HSC mobilization have been characterized. We tested the feasibility and the toxicity of a high-dose FEC regimen which may improve the mobilizing capacity of conventional FEC. Twenty patients with poor prognosis breast cancer received high-dose FEC and filgrastim 5 micrograms/kg. Three leukaphereses were performed on each patient for 3 consecutive days. Total numbers of CFU-GM and CD34+ cells were assessed, and a retrospective analysis was made. The numbers of CFU-GM/kg and CD34+ cells/kg collected (mean +/- standard error) were respectively 12.2 x 10(5) (+/- 2.4) and 14.6 x 10(6) (+/- 2.5). Extra-hematologic toxicity was negligible. Hematologic recovery after CTCb high-dose chemotherapy and HSC infusion was rapid. High-dose FEC is efficient for collecting HSC in peripheral blood. Extra-hematologic toxicity is weak and hematologic recovery after autograft is normal. Increased dosage of epirubicin and cyclophosphamide could allow a single leukapheresis collection of sufficient HSC from peripheral blood.     

Epirubicin cardiotoxicity: an analysis of 469 patients with metastatic breast cancer

PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of cumulative dose, dose-intensity, single-dose level, and schedule of epirubicin on the risk of developing congestive heart failure (CHF) in patients with advanced breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four hundred sixty-nine consecutive anthracyline-naive patients with metastatic breast cancer were included. Only patients with cardiac failure according to New York Heart Association (NYHA) function class II or more were recorded as having CHF. For each patient, the following were calculated: the cumulative dose of epirubicin, mean dose-intensity (cumulative dose of epirubicin/duration of treatment), and single-dose level (cumulative dose of epirubicin/number of injections). RESULTS: Thirty-four patients (7.2%) developed CHF. The cumulative risk of cardiotoxicity was 4% at 900 mg/m2 and increased exponentially to 15% at 1,000 mg/m2. Irradiation against the mediastinum and thoracic spine increased the risk of CHF (P=.025), but dose-intensity, single-dose level, and schedule had no influence on the risk of developing CHF. Age, previous adjuvant irradiation (to the left or right hemithorax), and previous chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil [CMF]) were not risk factors. The median time to onset of CHF following the last dose of epirubicin was 57 days (range, 0 to 853). Among patients with CHF, 13 (38.2%) died of cardiac failure. The median survival time for all patients with CHF was 162 days (range, 0 to +1,957). Previous irradiation directly against the heart increased the risk of death due to cardiac failure and decreased the median survival time to 125 days (range, 0 to 336). CONCLUSION: The present large retrospective study of 469 patients substantiates previous results concerning the cardiotoxicity of epirubicin. A significantly increasing risk of CHF in patients who receive cumulative doses greater than 950 mg/m2 was established. The future recommended maximum cumulative dose of epirubicin should be 900 mg/m2 in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Previous irradiation against the heart leads to an increased risk of developing CHF with an accelerated course to death, which indicates an additive cardiotoxic effect of irradiation and epirubicin.     

Multimodality treatment of 128 patients with locally advanced breast carcinoma in the era of mammography screening using standard polychemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide: prognostic and therapeutic implications

BACKGROUND: Locally advanced breast carcinoma is associated with a poor prognosis. With single treatment modalities, i.e., surgery and/or radiation therapy, results have been consistently dismal. However, several earlier reports have indicated improvement in survival with a combined modality approach, i.e., the utilization of systemic therapy. METHODS: Between 1991 and 1994, 128 patients with locally advanced noninflammatory or inflammatory breast carcinoma (LABC) were treated with a combined modality strategy consisting of 4-6 courses of preoperative 5-fluorouracil (600 mg/m2), epirubicin (60 mg/m2), and cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2) (FEC) every 3 weeks, followed by modified radical mastectomy or sector resection with axillary dissection in combination with postoperative radiotherapy and concomitant cyclophosphamide (850 mg/m2). Postoperatively, 3-5 adjuvant courses of FEC therapy were given. Nine percent of the patients received preoperative radiotherapy because the FEC therapy was not sufficiently effective. One-third of the patients were given tamoxifen (20 or 40 mg daily) at the end of the multimodal therapy. RESULTS: Clinical responses were observed in 60% of the patients; 5% had complete responses (CR) and 55% had partial responses (PR). Stable disease (SD) was observed in 40%. No patient had progressive disease (PD) preoperatively. With a median follow-up of 37 months, the median disease free survival (DFS) and median overall survival (OS) were 29 and 54 months, respectively. The actuarial 5-year DFS and OS were 36% and 49%, respectively. The locoregional recurrence rate was 20%, and 53% of the patients experienced systemic relapse. Univariate analysis revealed a significant prognostic difference according to clinical stage of LABC in favor of less advanced stages. Clinical and biologic parameters linked to a significantly worse prognosis were the presence of inflammatory breast carcinoma and peau d'orange. There was a significant trend of worse prognosis for patients receiving below 60% and 75% of the intended dose intensity with reference to DFS and OS, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Standard dose preoperative and postoperative FEC therapy combined with surgery and radiotherapy in the era of mammography screening seem to yield results comparable to those achieved with other conventional strategies in the treatment of unscreened populations.     

Phosphatidyl serine-dependent antiprothrombin antibody is exclusive to patients with lupus anticoagulant

In attempt to develop a new chemotherapeutic regimen including carboplatin (CBDCA), epirubicin (EPI), and VP-16 in extensive small cell lung cancer, with a higher dose intensity compared with previous experience of our group, we determined the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of VP-16 when administered in association with CBDCA (300 mg/ m2, i.v., day 1) and EPI (75 mg/m2, i.v., day 1), recycling chemotherapy every 3 weeks, with the support of granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). A total of 15 patients received three dose levels of VP-16 (mg/m2, i.v., daily on days 1-3): 100 (three patients), 120 (six), and 140 (six). G-CSF was administered subcutaneously at the dose of 5 micrograms/kg/day on days 6-15 of each chemotherapy course. The MTD was established at 140 mg/m2 and myelotoxicity, grade 4 neutropenia with death for sepsis in one case and grade 3 thrombocytopenia in three cases, was dose limiting. The recommended dose of VP-16 for a phase II study is 140 mg/m2.     

AZT plus methotrexate in HIV-related non-Hodgkin''s lymphomas

AZT is a thymidine analogue useful in the treatment of AIDS. It has been demonstrated that this compound can possess a significant antineoplastic activity when combined with de novo thymidylate synthesis inhibitors, such as 5-fluorouracil (5FU) and methotrexate (MTX). Here we report a review of our data concerning the efficacy and tolerance of the combination AZT + MTX in HIV-related non Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHL). Twenty-nine patients were treated, at weekly intervals, with three (patient 1 to 10) or six (patient 11 to 29) consecutive courses of MTX 1g/m2 and increasing doses of oral AZT (2, 4 and 6g/m2) with leucovorin rescue. Of 26 evaluable patients, a total (complete + partial) response rate of 77% was obtained. The median complete response duration was 16.8 months. There was one therapy-related death due to septic shock. Grade III-IV neutropenia was observed after 19% of the courses, but was prevented by G-CSF administration in 82/119 courses. Grade III-IV anemia was observed after 9% of the courses. In conclusion, the combination AZT + MTX was effective and well tolerated in our series of HIV-related NHL patients.     

Artificial intelligence in medicine: the challenges ahead

Forty chemotherapy naive patients with metastatic or locally advanced breast cancer were treated in a randomized trial comparing mitozantrone 14 mg/m2 with epirubicin 75 mg/m2 given intravenously at 3-weekly intervals. There was a 40% (95% confidence interval (CI) 8-72; P = 0.013) higher partial response rate with epirubicin (11/18) than with mitozantrone (4/19). Epirubicin caused significantly more alopecia (difference 76%; 95% CI 57-96; P < 0.0001) and nausea/vomiting (difference = 38%; 95% CI 10-67; P = 0.01). Three patients who received long courses of epirubicin experienced cardiac failure; two were proved to have cardiomyopathy. The median survival for the epirubicin and mitozantrone groups were 9.5 and 8 months respectively. Thus, although epirubicin gave a higher response rate it also caused more toxicity.     

Effect of duration of treatment on treatment outcome and cost of treatment for Wilms' tumor: a report from the National Wilms' Tumor Study Group

PURPOSE: National Wilms' Tumor Study (NWTS)-4 was designed to evaluate the efficacy, toxicity, and cost of the administration of different regimens for the treatment of Wilms' tumor (WT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between August 6, 1986 and September 1, 1994, 905 previously untreated children aged younger than 16 years with stage II favorable histology (FH) WT (low-risk [LR]), stages III to IV FH WT, or stages I to IV clear-cell sarcoma of the kidney (high-risk[HR]) were randomized after the completion of 6 months of chemotherapy to discontinue (short) or continue for 9 additional months (long) treatment with chemotherapy regimens that included vincristine and either divided-dose (standard [STD]) courses (5 days) or single-dose (pulse-intensive [PI]) treatment with dactinomycin. HR patients also received either divided-dose (STD) courses (3 days) or single-dose (PI) treatment with doxorubicin. RESULTS: The 4-year relapse-free survival (RFS) rates after the second randomization for LR patients were 83.7% for the 190 patients treated with short and 88.2% for the 187 patients treated with long chemotherapy (P = .11). The 4-year RFS rates after the second randomization for HR FH patients were 89.7% for the 256 patients treated with short and 88.8% for the 246 patients treated with long chemotherapy (P = .87). The charge for treatment with the short PI treatment regimens for all children with stages I through IV FH WT was approximately one half of that with the long STD treatment regimens. CONCLUSION: The short administration schedule for the treatment of children with WT is no less effective than the long administration schedule and can be administered at a substantially lower total treatment cost.     

Prevention of infections in a case with myelodysplastic syndrome by an intermittent subcutaneous administration of G-CSF

An 83-year-old male was admitted to our hospital because of pancytopenia and low grade fever on April 19, 1993. On admission, hematological data were as follows: WBC 1,000/microliters with 19% neutrophils, RBC 367 x 10(4)/microliters, Hb 9.5 g/dl and platelets 6.7 x 10(4)/microliters. Bone marrow examination revealed 6.6% myeloblasts and 33.5% erythroblasts. Morphological abnormalities included hypersegmentation, degranulation and pseudo-Pelger's nuclear anomaly in neutrophils. Based on these findings the diagnosis of refractory anemia with excess of blasts (RAEB) of the myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) was made and therapy with low dose Cytarabine (Ara-C) was initiated in April 1993. The patient had two episodes of severe pneumonia in June and July. Therefore, 75 micrograms/day of G-CSF was given in addition to antibiotic therapy for the second episode of infection in July. Thereafter the severe infection subsided, and G-CSF administration was switched to an intermittent schedule (75 micrograms twice a week) since September. Cytarabine ocfosfate (100 mg/day) was added for 10-14 days at interval 1-2 months from October,1993. He has been well with no episode of infection for more than two year. One major concern regarding the clinical application of G-CSF in MDS patients is related to the possible stimulation of leukemic cell proliferation. Frequent hematological monitoring is necessary in patients with RAEB who are prone to develop acute myeloid leukemia. However, we administered G-CSF at a relatively low dose twice a week for over two year and could successfully prevent infections without inducing the leukemic changes.     

Epirubicin and etoposide combination chemotherapy to treat hepatocellular carcinoma patients: a phase II study

Approximately half the patients affected with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) present with unresectable disease, so that efficacious systemic chemotherapy protocols are badly needed. We report the results of a phase-II study aimed at testing the efficacy and toxicity of a combination of epirubicin and VP-16. Thirty six patients (80 men and 6 women) received epirubicin (40 mg/m2, on day 1) and VP-16 (120 mg/m2, on days 1, 3 and 5) every 28th day. Chemotherapy was stopped in case of disease progression, while the patients who achieved an objective response or who had stable disease continued treatment for a maximum of 10 cycles. One patient (3%) achieved a complete response, while 13 patients (36%) achieved partial response, i.e. 14 objective responses in all (39%, 95% CI: 23-55%). 11 patients (31%) exhibited stable disease, while in the other 11 patients (31%) the disease progressed. Median overall survival time was 10 months and 13.5 months in the subgroup of patients responding to treatment. Significant, especially haematological, toxicity was documented, but in no case was it so severe as to require discontinuation of treatment or reduction of the dosage. In conclusion, this combination appears to be an active and tolerable therapeutic option for HCC patients who are not candidates for surgical or locoregional procedures, and in our opinion it deserves further exploration within a randomised controlled trial versus best supportive therapy.     

Paclitaxel in combination chemotherapy with radiotherapy in patients with unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE: The addition of combination chemotherapy to standard radiation therapy has improved treatment for locally unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer. In this phase II study, we evaluated the toxicity and efficacy of a novel chemotherapy regimen that included paclitaxel, cisplatin, and etoposide plus concurrent radiation therapy in this group of patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-three patients with previously untreated, unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (stage IIIA, 11 patients; stage IIIB, 22 patients) initially received two courses of chemotherapy, which included paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 by 1-hour infusion on day 1, cisplatin 60 mg/m/ intravenously (i.v.) on day 2, and etoposide 100 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1, 2 and 3. On week 6, radiation therapy (60 Gy in 30 fractions) was initiated in conjunction with two additional courses of chemotherapy: paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 i.v. by 1-hour infusion on day 1, cisplatin 5 mg/m2 i.v. on days 2- to 10, and etoposide 25 mg/m2 on days 1 to 10. RESULTS: This combined modality program was feasible and well tolerated by most patients. During the two courses of induction chemotherapy, grade 3 or 4 myelosuppression occurred in only six patients (18%). Esophagitis was common during combined modality therapy (grade 3, 10 patients; grade 4 five patients). Forty-two percent of patients had partial response after two courses of induction therapy, and 82% of patients had an objective response at completion of therapy. Twelve patients (36%) had a complete response. Nineteen patients remain progression-free at a median of 8 months; the median survival time has not been reached. CONCLUSION: This paclitaxel-containing combined modality therapy is feasible and highly active in patients with inoperable stage III lung cancer. Esophagitis is the most common severe toxicity with this program. Further studies with paclitaxel-containing combination regimens in patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer are indicated.     

A phase I/II study of multicyclic dose-intensive chemotherapy supported with G-CSF, or G-CSF and haematopoietic progenitor cells in whole blood, in two consecutive cohorts of patients

We investigated the reconstitutive potential of haematopoietic progenitor cells collected in autologous whole blood during multicycle dose-intensified chemotherapy. Forty patients with metastatic solid tumours were treated with up to six cycles of cisplatin and escalating doses of ifosfamide every 14 days. Cisplatin was administered in 3% sodium chloride over 3 h, followed by ifosfamide over 24 h and mesna over 36 h. The first cohort of patients received granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) days 4-14. Once dose-limiting toxicity was reached in cohort 1, the study continued with a second cohort of patients, in whom, in addition to G-CSF on days 4-14, 500 ml of G-CSF and chemotherapy-'primed' whole blood was collected on day 15, i.e. on day 1 of treatment cycles two to six, before cisplatin administration. This volume of blood was kept unprocessed at 4 degrees C and reinfused 20-24 h after the completion of ifosfamide. In cohort 1, dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was reached at ifosfamide 6.0 g m(-2) with two out of six of the patients developing neutropenic fever. Although in cohort 2 no neutropenic fever was encountered, neither the frequency nor the duration of grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were reduced. Cumulative asthenia resulted in DLT at 7.0 g m(-2). The median number of CD34+ cells in 500 ml of whole blood after the first cycle (i.e. at start of cycle 2) was 1.15 x 10(6) kg(-1). This number was significantly greater after the second cycle (2.06 x 10(6) kg(-1), P = 0.01) and then gradually decreased after cycles three to six. After storing whole blood, the number of CD34+ cells had not decreased (median + 10%). We conclude that the method of combined bone marrow support by G-CSF and haematopoietic progenitor cells in autologous whole blood collected before each cycle of a 2-weekly regimen of cisplatin-ifosfamide does not result in clinically measurable reduced bone marrow toxicity compared with what can be expected by the use of G-CSF alone.     

Cycles of dose-intensive chemotherapy with peripheral stem cell support in persistent or recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to determine the toxicity and surgically documented response rate of sequential high-dose chemotherapy with peripheral stem cell support in patients with persistent or recurrent cisplatin-sensitive ovarian cancer. METHODS: Fourteen patients (average age, 45 years) were treated with cyclophosphamide (4.5 g/m2), followed by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-stimulated peripheral stem cell harvests. The subsequent regimen prescribed three courses of carboplatin (1 g/m2) and cyclophosphamide (1.5 g/m2 with 2-mercaptoethanesulfonate) every 2 weeks with stem cell support. This was followed by three courses of paclitaxel at 250 mg/m2 every 2 weeks with G-CSF support only. Six patients were entered on the basis of a positive second-look laparotomy and 8 patients had a first recurrence after at least a 6-month disease-free interval. RESULTS: Fourteen patients were entered and 12 patients completed all planned courses of therapy (mean time, 13 weeks). Normal hematopoiesis was reestablished after each cycle. Hospitalization for neutropenic fever occurred in 11/93 cycles (11.8%). Thirteen patients required blood transfusions and in 12 patients platelet transfusions were given. One patient had grade 3 neurotoxicity. An initial elevated CA 125 returned to normal in 7/8 patients (88%) and 71% of patients with measurable disease responded to therapy. There were 2 pathologic complete responders (PCR), making the PCR rate 2/14 or 14% (0-35%). CONCLUSION: Although this regimen was well tolerated and clinical response rates were high, the surgically documented response rate was not clearly superior to conventional salvage regimens in platinum-sensitive patients.     

Paclitaxel by 96-hour continuous infusion in combination with cisplatin: a phase I trial in patients with advanced lung cancer

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of paclitaxel administered by 96-hour continuous infusion in combination with cisplatin, to determine if the addition of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) permits significant paclitaxel dose escalation, and to assess the toxicity and preliminary activity of this combination in patients with advanced lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty patients with untreated lung cancer were enrolled: 42 had advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and eight had extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Patients received paclitaxel doses of 100 to 180 mg/m2/96 hours and cisplatin doses of 60 to 80 mg/m2 as a single 30-minute bolus injection at the end of the paclitaxel infusion. RESULTS: Two of six patients experienced dose-limiting neutropenia at a dose of paclitaxel 140 mg/m2/96 hours and cisplatin 80 mg/m2. With G-CSF support, one of three patients experienced both dose-limiting mucositis and fatal neutropenic sepsis at a dose of paclitaxel 180 mg/m2/96 hours and cisplatin 80 mg/m2. Significant peripheral neuropathy developed in five patients and occurred after six or more cycles of therapy. Thirty-three of 42 patients with NSCLC had measurable disease; the objective response rate was 55%, with two complete responses and 16 partial responses. For all 42 patients with NSCLC, the median time to progression and median survival duration were 5 months and 10 months, respectively. The actuarial 1-year survival rate was 41%. Of eight SCLC patients, four responded to therapy, and the median survival duration for all SCLC patients was 11 months. CONCLUSION: The MTD without G-CSF is paclitaxel 120 mg/m2/96 hours and cisplatin 80 mg/m2, and the MTD with G-CSF is paclitaxel 160 mg/m2/96 hours and cisplatin 80 mg/m2. Infusional paclitaxel with cisplatin is well tolerated and active in patients with advanced NSCLC.     

Effect of protective colloids on the induction of polymorphic changes in indomethacin agglomerates after solvent evaporation from o/w emulsions

BACKGROUND: It was previously reported that the combination of granulocyte-macrophage-colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and granulocyte-CSF (G-CSF) for 4 days mobilized more primitive CD34+ subsets than did either G-CSF or GM-CSF alone. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The studies determine the optimal number of days of growth factor dosing for mobilization and collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells, by increasing the days of administration of GM-CSF and/or G-CSF or employing the sequential administration of GM-CSF followed by G-CSF. Sixty normal subjects were given injections of G-CSF or GM-CSF alone; GM-CSF and G-CSF concurrently for 4, 5, or 6 days; or a sequential regimen of GM-CSF for 3 or 4 days followed by G-CSF for 2 or 3 days. A 10-L apheresis was performed 24 hours after the last dose. RESULTS: The three most efficacious mobilization regimens consisted of sequential GM-CSF for 3 days followed by G-CSF for either 2 or 3 days and G-CSF alone for 5 days. Each of these regimens resulted in the collection of significantly greater numbers of CD34+ cells by apheresis than any of the 4-day dosing regimens with G-CSF and/or GM-CSF (sequential GM-CSF/G-CSF: 3 days/2 days = 3.58 +/- 0.53 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg; GM-CSF/G-CSF: 3 days/3 days = 4.45 +/- 1.08 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg; G-CSF: 5 days = 3.58 +/- 0.97 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg; all p<0.05 vs. G-CSF and/or GM-CSF for 4 days). Clonogenic assays generally paralleled the level of CD34+ cells. Regimens containing GM-CSF resulted in a higher percentage of the cells from primitive CD34+/CD38-/HLA-DR+ subset than G-CSF alone. CONCLUSION: Compared with 4-day dosing regimens with G-CSF and/or GM-CSF, mobilization of CD34+ cells in normal subjects using sequential GM-CSF for 3 days followed by G-CSF for 2 or 3 days or using G-CSF alone for 5 days increased the number CD34+ cells that can be collected by a single 10-L apheresis 24 hours after the last dose of cytokine.