Combination of behaviour therapy with fluvoxamine in comparison with behaviour therapy and placebo. Results of a multicentre study

BACKGROUND: We investigated whether the combination of multi-modal behaviour therapy (BT) with fluvoxamine is superior to BT and placebo in the acute treatment of severely ill in-patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). METHOD: In a randomised, double-blind design, 30 patients were treated for nine weeks with BT plus placebo and 30 patients with BT plus fluvoxamine (maximum dosage 300 mg, mean dose 288.1 mg). BT included exposure with response prevention, cognitive restructuring and development of alternative behaviours. RESULTS: Both groups showed a highly significant symptom reduction after treatment. There were no significant differences between the groups concerning compulsions. Obsessions were significantly more reduced in the fluvoxamine and BT group than in the placebo and BT group. Furthermore, the group BT plus fluvoxamine showed a significantly higher response rate (87.5 v. 60%) according to a previously defined response criterion. Severely depressed patients with OCD receiving BT plus placebo presented a significantly worse treatment outcome (Y-BOCS scores) than all other groups. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that BT should be combined with fluvoxamine when obsessions dominate the clinical picture and when a secondary depression is present.     

The effect of compensation involvement on the reporting of pain and disability by patients referred for rehabilitation of chronic low back pain

STUDY DESIGN: In this prospective, observational, cohort study of 192 individuals with chronic low back pain, the group of individuals was divided based on compensation involvement, and their presentation pain and disability, treatment recommendations, and compliance were compared. For 85 of these individuals who completed a spine rehabilitation program, their pain and disability at 3 and 12 months were compared. OBJECTIVES: To test the theory that individuals with compensation involvement presented with greater pain and disability and would report less change of pain and disability after rehabilitation efforts. BACKGROUND: Previous studies have produced conflicting results concerning this issue. METHODS: Individuals were recruited as consecutive patients referred for consultation at a spine rehabilitation center. Pain, depression, and disability were assessed using self-report questionnaires at evaluation and at 3 and 12 months. Rehabilitation services consisted of aggressive, quota-based exercises aimed at correcting impairments in flexibility, strength, endurance, and lifting capacity, identified through quantification of back function. Multifactoral analysis of variance models were used to control for baseline differences between compensation and noncompensation patients during analysis of target variables. RESULTS: The compensation group included 96 patients; these patients reported more pain, depression, and disability than the 96 patients without compensation involvement. These differences persisted when baseline differences were controlled for with multifactoral analysis of variance models. Treatment recommendations and compliance were not affected by compensation. For patients completing the spine rehabilitation program, length of treatment, flexibility, strength, lifting ability, and lower extremity work performance before and after treatment and patient satisfaction ratings were similar for the compensation and noncompensation groups. At 3 and 12 months, improvements in depression and disability were noted for both groups, but were statistically and clinically less substantial for the compensation group. At the 12 month follow-up visit, pain scores improved for the noncompensation group, but not for the compensation group. CONCLUSIONS: In chronic low back pain, compensation involvement may have an adverse effect on self-reported pain, depression, and disability before and after rehabilitation interventions.     

Placebo-controlled trial of flosequinan in moderate heart failure. The possible importance of aetiology and method of analysis in the interpretation of the results of heart failure trials

One hundred-thirty five patients with moderate heart failure, recruited from 18 centres, were included in a double blind, placebo controlled study to evaluate the effects of flosequinan on symptom limited tread-mill exercise tolerance. Fifteen patients in the placebo group were withdrawn from the study compared with 14 from the group given flosequinan. New York Heart Association classification was improved at week 16 in the flosequinan group relative to those randomised to placebo (P < 0.01). Depending how the other results are analysed flosequinan either appeared to have no effect on symptom limited exercise tolerance in those who completed the study; a suggestion of superiority if an analysis at endpoint is used (P = 0.09), or, if a covariate analysis at endpoint is used, then a significant improvement can be demonstrated (P = 0.04). Subset analysis suggests that the aetiology of the heart failure and the dose of diuretics used might have a major effect on the response to treatment. The best way of analysing clinical trials in heart failure is not clear as the results can be profoundly influenced by the way data from withdrawn patients are handled. The aetiology and diuretic requirement of patients may influence their response to treatment.     

D-penicillamine in early rheumatoid arthritis: experience from a 2-year double blind placebo controlled study

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the usefulness of early treatment with D-Penicillamine (DPA) in rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: The patients were recruited from a Swedish early RA cohort comprising 180 patients. All patients experiencing active and/or erosive disease 2 years from onset were asked to participate in a 2-year placebo-controlled DPA trial. Previous treatment with slow-acting anti-rheumatic drugs (SAARDs) or oral corticosteroids was not allowed. The main outcome variable was radiographic progression in the hands and feet evaluated according to Larsen. Clinical assessment including the Ritchie index, active joint count, and the HAQ-disability index was performed every 6th month. Patients were included in the analyses of efficacy until the endpoint of therapy. RESULTS: 111/180 patients were eligible for treatment, and 74 agreed to participate in the trial. 21/33 patients on DPA and 22/41 on placebo completed the study. More patients taking placebo stopped due to lack of response (p < 0.01). 27% of the patients on DPA were withdrawn due to side effects. Radiographic deterioration increased but most clinical variables improved in both trial arms. A large inter-individual variation was observed. The only significant difference in trend over 2 years between DPA and placebo was found for joint tenderness. However, the median trends for most clinical variables showed a more positive effect for DPA. The 37 patients who refused to participate in the trial in general fared somewhat worse than patients taking DPA and somewhat better than patients taking placebo. The remission rate was about the same in all 3 groups (12-13.5%). CONCLUSIONS: About two-thirds of all early definite RA patients were eligible for treatment using current criteria. Psychological readiness for early therapy was fairly modest with a high refusal rate. The difference in efficacy between DPA and placebo was small, but was in favour of DPA for most clinical variables. However, only joint tenderness showed a significantly better trend. No significant slowing of radiographic progression by DPA was found.     

Possible involvement of free radicals in lipopolysaccharide-induced labyrinthitis in the guinea pig: a morphological and functional investigation

BACKGROUND: There are few published placebo-controlled clinical trials demonstrating the efficacy of the newer antidepressants in markedly or severely depressed hospitalized patients. This study demonstrates the efficacy of nefazodone compared with placebo in the treatment of patients hospitalized for major depression. METHOD: Nefazodone and placebo treatment were compared in a 6-week trial of 120 patients hospitalized for DSM-III-R diagnosed major depression (without psychosis) at 2 study centers. Efficacy was evaluated using standard psychiatric rating scales, and patients were monitored for safety. RESULTS: Nefazodone treatment resulted in a significant reduction (p < .01) of the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D-17) total score compared with placebo from the end of the first treatment week through the end of the study (-12.2 nefazodone vs. -7.7 placebo). At the end of the trial, significantly more nefazodone-treated patients (50%) than placebo-treated patients (29%) had responded, as indicated by their Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement score (p = .021) or by a > or = 50% reduction in their HAM-D-17 scores (p = .017). Significantly more patients treated with nefazodone (36%) than placebo-treated patients (14%) had a HAM-D-17 score < or = 10 at the end of treatment (p = .004). Significant treatment differences (p < .01) in favor of nefazodone were also seen in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale; the HAM-D retardation, anxiety, and sleep disturbance factors; and HAM-D item 1 (depressed mood). Patients with dysthymia in addition to major depression also showed significant improvement (p < .05) when treated with nefazodone, with significant differences in response rates seen as early as week 2 and through the end of the trial. The mean nefazodone dose was 491 mg/day at the end of week 2 and 503 mg/day at the end of treatment. Nefazodone was well tolerated, and the number of patients discontinuing owing to adverse events was small, with no significant safety issues noted in either treatment group. Fewer nefazodone-treated than placebo-treated patients discontinued owing to lack of efficacy. CONCLUSION: Nefazodone was superior to placebo in the treatment of marked to severe major depression in patients requiring hospitalization. The clinical benefit of nefazodone was evident as early as the first week of treatment as judged by several measures of efficacy, with significant differences from placebo sustained throughout the trial.     

Interferon gamma-1b compared with placebo in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma. Canadian Urologic Oncology Group

BACKGROUND: Most trials of immunomodulators in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma have been uncontrolled and subject to selection bias. The objective of this blinded, placebo-controlled study was to compare overall response rates, time to disease progression, and survival of patients with metastatic renal-cell carcinoma treated with recombinant human interferon gamma-1b or placebo. METHODS: Patients with biopsy-proved metastatic renal-cell carcinoma were randomly assigned to receive interferon gamma-1b (60 microg per square meter of body-surface area subcutaneously once weekly) or placebo. The primary tumor had been treated by nephrectomy or angioinfarction at least three weeks previously. Patients were evaluated for radiologic evidence of progression, and all responses were independently reviewed by a committee that was unaware of the treatment. RESULTS: A total of 197 patients with metastatic renal-cell carcinoma were enrolled at 17 centers in Canada. One hundred eighty-one patients could be evaluated; of these, 91 were assigned to receive interferon gamma-1b and 90 were given placebo. The groups were well balanced in terms of prognostic factors. Two thirds of all patients had Karnofsky scores of 90 or 100, and more than half had two or more metastatic sites. Grade I and II toxicity, mostly chills, fever, asthenia, or headaches, was reported in 91 percent and 61 percent, respectively, of the patients in the interferon group, as compared with 76 percent and 63 percent in the placebo group. Life-threatening drug-related events were rare, occurring in 1 percent of patients in the interferon group. No significant differences between groups were observed in overall response rates, time to disease progression, or survival. The overall response rate was 4.4 percent (3.3 percent complete response and 1.1 percent partial response) in the interferon group and 6.6 percent (3.3 percent complete response and 3.3 percent partial response) in the placebo group (P=0.54), with a rate of durable complete response of 1 percent in both groups. The median time to disease progression was 1.9 months in both groups (P=0.49), and there was no significant difference in median survival (12.2 months with interferon vs. 15.7 months with placebo, P=0.52). CONCLUSIONS: No difference in outcome was observed in patients with metastatic renal-cell carcinoma who were treated with interferon gamma-1b as compared with placebo. These results emphasize the necessity of testing the efficacy of immunomodulators in randomized studies.     

Reduction in suicidal ideation with SSRIs: a review of 459 depressed patients

This paper is a review of 459 outpatients treated in double-blind clinical drug trials using similar protocols which compared the clinical responses to specific serotonin reuptake inhibitors, norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, mixed norepinephrine serotonin reuptake inhibitors, serotonin-2 antagonists and placebo. Although improvements in the total score on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression did not differ significantly among the groups, there were differences in the profile of response based on analysis of the items of the scale. The most striking difference was the significantly more rapid and effective improvement in depressed mood and the lessening of suicidal ideation among the patients treated with specific serotonin reuptake inhibitors.     

Joint destruction after glucocorticoids are withdrawn in early rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis and Rheumatism Council Low Dose Glucocorticoid Study Group

OBJECTIVE: Prednisolone reduced the progression of joint destruction over 2 yr in early, active rheumatoid arthritis. The response to discontinuation of prednisolone under double-blind conditions is now reported. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of prednisolone 7.5 mg daily in addition to routine medication over 2 yr in 128 patients with early rheumatoid arthritis, using radiological progression (changes in the Larsen score) and the development of erosions as primary outcome measures. Study medication was blindly discontinued and follow-up maintained for a further year. Other assessments included disability, joint inflammation, pain and the acute-phase response. RESULTS: Similar results were obtained when all available radiographs were included for each year of assessment (maximum 114) and when only patients with radiographs at all time points were included (75 patients). In these 75, the mean progression in the prednisolone group was 0.21 Larsen units in year 1, 0.04 units in year 2 and 1.01 units in year 3 (P = 0.587, 0.913 and 0.039 for change within each year, respectively). The equivalent placebo group means were 2.34, 1.00 and 1.63 Larsen units (P = 0.001, 0.111 and 0.012; difference between groups: 2.13, 0.96 and 0.67 units, P = 0.082, 0.02 and 0.622). The percentage of hands which had erosions at each time point was: prednisolone group: 27.8, 29.2, 34.7 and 39.2; placebo group: 28.2, 48.7, 59.0 and 66.5. There was little evidence for a flare in clinical symptoms after discontinuation of prednisolone. CONCLUSION: Joint destruction resumed after discontinuation of prednisolone. This corroborates the previously reported therapeutic effect and challenges current concepts of disease pathogenesis.     

Marital distress, depression, and attributions: Is the marital distress-attribution association an artifact of depression?

We examined whether the association between marital distress and attributions is an artifact of depression. Study 1 showed that the attributions of 40 wives recruited from the community accounted for variance in their marital satisfaction after the effects of depression had been taken into account. Study 2 compared the attributions of 20 clinically depressed and maritally distressed wives (respondents to an advertisement offering therapy for depression and marital problems), 20 nondepressed but distressed wives (clients seeking marital therapy at a clinic), and a control group of 20 nondepressed and nondistressed wives (respondents to an advertisement for participants in a research project). The first two groups did not differ in attributions, but the attributions of both groups differed from those of the control group. Both studies therefore suggest that the association between attributions and marital satisfaction is not due to depression. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Early changes in biochemical markers of bone turnover predict the long-term response to alendronate therapy in representative elderly women: a randomized clinical trial

Although the antiresorptive agent alendronate has been shown to increase bone mineral density (BMD) at the hip and spine and decrease the incidence of osteoporotic fractures in older women, few data are available regarding early prediction of long-term response to therapy, particularly with regard to increases in hip BMD. Examining short-term changes in biochemical markers incorporates physiologic response with therapeutic compliance and should provide useful prognostic information for patients. The objective of this study was to examine whether early changes in biochemical markers of bone turnover predict long-term changes in hip BMD in elderly women. The study was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial which took place in a community-based academic hospital. One hundred and twenty community-dwelling, ambulatory women 65 years of age and older participated in the study. Intervention consisted of alendronate versus placebo for 2.5 years. All patients received appropriate calcium and vitamin D supplementation. The principal outcome measures included BMD of the hip (total hip, femoral neck, trochanter, and intertrochanter), spine (posteroanterior [PA] and lateral), total body, and radius. Biochemical markers of bone resorption included urinary N-telopeptide cross-linked collagen type I and free deoxypyridinoline; markers of bone formation included serum osteocalcin and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase. Long-term alendronate therapy was associated with increased BMD at the total hip (4.0%), femoral neck (3.1%), trochanter (5.5%), intertrochanter (3.8%), PA spine (7.8%), lateral spine (10.6%), total body (2.2%), and one-third distal radius (1.3%) in elderly women (all p < 0.01). In the placebo group, bone density increased 1.9-2.1% at the spine (p < 0.05) and remained stable at all other sites. At 6 months, there were significant decreases in all markers of bone turnover (-10% to -53%, p < 0.01) in women on alendronate. The changes in urinary cross-linked collagen at 6 months correlated with long-term bone density changes at the hip (r = -0.35, p < 0.01), trochanter (r = -0.36, p < 0.01), PA spine (r = -0.41, p < 0.01), and total body (r = -0.34, p < 0.05). At 6 months, patients with the greatest drop in urinary cross-linked collagen (65% or more) demonstrated the greatest gains in total hip, trochanteric, and vertebral bone density (all p < 0.05). A 30% decrease in urinary cross-linked collagen at 6 months predicted a bone density increase of 2.8-4.1% for the hip regions and 5.8-6.9% for the spine views at the 2.5-year time point (p < 0.05). There were no substantive associations between changes in biochemical markers and bone density in the placebo group. Alendronate therapy was associated with significant long-term gains in BMD at all clinically relevant sites, including the hip, in elderly women. Moreover, these improvements were associated with early decreases in biochemical markers of bone turnover. Early dynamic decreases in urinary cross-linked collagen can be used to monitor and predict long-term response to bisphosphonate therapy in elderly women. Future studies are needed to determine if early assessment improves long-term patient compliance or uncovers poor compliance, thereby aiding the physician in maximizing the benefits of therapy.     

Review article: treatment of Clostridium difficile infection

AIM: A systematic review of controlled trials of therapy of Clostridium difficile intestinal infection using methodology described by the Cochrane Collaboration. METHODS: Trials were identified by searching computer databases over the years 1978-1996. Trials were included if they were (a) prospective randomized, controlled trials and (b) included patients with symptomatic disease. The primary end-point was clinical resolution of diarrhoea. Secondary end-points were clinical relapse and stool clearance of C. difficile and C. difficile toxin. RESULTS: Nine trials (469 patients) satisfying the inclusion criteria were identified. Two trials were placebo controlled. Six trials compared vancomycin to other antibiotics (fusidic acid, bacitracin, teicoplanin and metronidazole). For clinical resolution response rates ranged from 21 (placebo) to 100% (vancomycin). On pooling the trials, no antibiotic showed clear therapeutic superiority. Rates of clinical relapse ranged from 5 to 42%. Only one trial showed significant advantage of one antibiotic over another for prevention of relapse (teicoplanin vs. fusidic acid). CONCLUSION: The published data are limited, and further studies are required.     

Characteristics of fluoxetine versus placebo responders in a randomized trial of geriatric depression

Results from placebo-controlled trials of antidepressants can be used to identify patients most likely to benefit from medication. Using data from a randomized clinical trial of fluoxetine versus placebo for 671 elderly outpatients with major depression, we evaluated characteristics of those who improved with and without active medication. We found that the choice of outcome measure made a difference when evaluating the effectiveness of fluoxetine relative to placebo and determining the accuracy of predictive variables in both treatment groups. Generally, less severe depression predicted favorable response (greater than 50% improvement on the 21-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression [HAM-D-21], less than 3 on the Clinical Global Impressions [CGI] and Patient Global Impressions [PGI] improvement scales) and remission (less than 9 on 6-week HAM-D-21) with both fluoxetine and placebo. Less anxiety/somatization was associated with favorable fluoxetine response, and lower levels of cognitive and sleep disturbance were associated with remission in the placebo group. By contrast, higher levels of psychomotor retardation in the placebo group were associated with clinician and patient ratings of much or very much improved. The similarities among responders in both groups may indicate that some in the fluoxetine group would have improved with placebo.     

Community consultation in socially sensitive research: Lessons from clinical trials of treatments for AIDS.

Contends that few studies have more starkly posed the dilemmas in socially sensitive research than the recent and ongoing clinical trials of medications (such as azidothymidine [AZT]) to treat acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS). One response to such dilemmas is to include potential participants or surrogates for them in decision making. Although the investigator and relevant regulatory bodies are not absolved of responsibility by community consultation, such a procedure may help to create a partnership between the investigator and participants, consistent with ethical duties of respect for persons, beneficence, and fidelity. Community consultation also may dampen participants' anxiety and increase perceived justice of decisions about the research. Such a procedure has the potential to mitigate ethical problems in research involving a wide variety of socially sensitive topics and in randomized clinical trials of treatments for conditions other than AIDS. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Effect of a community health center intervention on breast cancer screening among Hispanic American women

OBJECTIVE: A multiple component intervention in a community health center is presented, and its effect on breast cancer screening participation by Hispanic American women between the ages of 45 and 75 years is discussed. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: In 1990, data were collected through a retrospective audit (at least as far back as 1987) of community health center medical records, as well as from a client referral log. The health center, located in a small Massachusetts city, primarily serves clients of Latino heritage. STUDY DESIGN: The study used a nonexperimental pretest-posttest intervention design to document clients' screening activities. To control for uneven length of enrollment, aging of the population, and sporadic utilization, the unit of analysis chosen for the principle study variables was an "eligible year." DATA COLLECTION: Variables of interest included screening (clinical breast exam and mammography), periodicity of screening, and compliance with referrals. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Postintervention, considerably greater screening mammography occurred among all age groups, more women had at least one screening mammogram during the period, more clinical breast exams included a mammogram referral, and the compliance rate improved. The rate of clinical breast exam did not significantly improve, showing a downward trend.     

Treatment of irritable bowel syndrome with Chinese herbal medicine: a randomized controlled trial

CONTEXT: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common functional bowel disorder for which there is no reliable medical treatment. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) is of any benefit in the treatment of IBS. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted during 1996 through 1997. SETTING: Patients were recruited through 2 teaching hospitals and 5 private practices of gastroenterologists, and received CHM in 3 Chinese herbal clinics. PATIENTS: A total of 116 patients who fulfilled the Rome criteria, an established standard for diagnosis of IBS. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomly allocated to 1 of 3 treatment groups: individualized Chinese herbal formulations (n = 38), a standard Chinese herbal formulation (n = 43), or placebo (n = 35). Patients received 5 capsules 3 times daily for 16 weeks and were evaluated regularly by a traditional Chinese herbalist and by a gastroenterologist. Patients, gastroenterologists, and herbalists were all blinded to treatment group. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Change in total bowel symptom scale scores and global improvement assessed by patients and gastroenterologists and change in the degree of interference in life caused by IBS symptoms assessed by patients. RESULTS: Compared with patients in the placebo group, patients in the active treatment groups (standard and individualized CHM) had significant improvement in bowel symptom scores as rated by patients (P=.03) and by gastroenterologists (P=.001), and significant global improvement as rated by patients (P=.007) and by gastroenterologists (P=.002). Patients reported that treatment significantly reduced the degree of interference with life caused by IBS symptoms (P=.03). Chinese herbal formulations individually tailored to the patient proved no more effective than standard CHM treatment. On follow-up 14 weeks after completion of treatment, only the individualized CHM treatment group maintained improvement. CONCLUSION: Chinese herbal formulations appear to offer improvement in symptoms for some patients with IBS.     

Pharmacokinetics of meropenem in critically ill patients with acute renal failure treated by continuous hemodiafiltration

A prospective, randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled study was conducted to assess the effectiveness of i.v. administration of 6% hydroxyethyle starch solution (HES) in preventing moderate and severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in patients in an in-vitro fertilization programme. A total of 101 women who had serum oestradiol concentrations >1500 pg/ml and/or more than 10 follicles on day of human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) administration were recruited into two groups: HES group (n = 51) received 1000 ml 6% HES; and the placebo group (n = 50) received 1000 ml of sodium chloride 0.9% solution at the time shortly after embryo transfer. Follow-up examinations 7 +/- 1 and 14 +/- 1 days after embryo transfer included transvaginal ultrasound (diameters of each ovary and maximum cysts, number of cysts, ascites), blood tests (serum oestradiol, progesterone, beta-HCG, C-reactive protein, blood count, plasma proteins, electrolytes, kidney function tests) and evaluation of abdominal pain, nausea, diarrhoea, abdominal swelling and weight gain. Only one moderate OHSS developed in the HES group whereas seven moderate-severe cases were observed in the placebo group (P = 0.031). Furthermore, serum oestradiol concentration, leukocyte count, increase in abdominal circumference and weight gain 14 days after embryo transfer were significantly higher in the placebo group. There were no differences between the two groups in terms of age, oestradiol concentration and number of follicles at time of HCG injection. Administration of 6% HES prevents the development of moderate-severe OHSS in risk patients.     

Rivastigmine. A review of its use in Alzheimer's disease

Rivastigmine (SDZ ENA 713) is a carbamylating, long-acting reversible and noncompetitive carbamate acetylcholinesterase inhibitor that is indicated as an oral treatment for patients with mild to moderately severe Alzheimer's disease. The drug has been evaluated for this use in 3 well designed, adequately powered, phase II/III, 26-week clinical trials that included a total of 1479 rivastigmine and 647 placebo recipients. Most of these patients had concomitant disorders that were being treated with numerous other drugs. Individual and pooled results of these trials indicate that rivastigmine 6 to 12 mg/day usually produces cognitive, global and functional changes that indicate significantly less deterioration than was observed with placebo in patients with mild to moderately severe Alzheimer's disease. Individual results of the 2 pivotal trials and pooled analysis also show that, compared with placebo recipients, significantly more rivastigmine 6 to 12 mg/day recipients respond to therapy. Indeed, after 26 weeks of therapy in the 2 pivotal trials, significantly more rivastigmine 6 to 12 mg/day than placebo recipients achieved clinically meaningful improvements as defined by 3 separate response criteria. The lower dosage range of 1 to 4 mg/day was not as effective as 6 to 12 mg/day, as measured using these criteria and other efficacy parameters. Rivastigmine causes adverse events that are generally those expected from an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor. They are usually mild to moderate, of short duration and responsive to dosage reduction. Unpublished data from 3989 patients indicate that rivastigmine and placebo were associated with similar incidences of serious adverse events and changes in laboratory parameters, ECG and cardiorespiratory vital signs. The most common events were gastrointestinal, central and peripheral nervous system and whole body adverse events. However, compared with placebo, rivastigmine more commonly caused adverse events resulting in treatment withdrawal. These events were most frequently gastrointestinal and were more common in women. CONCLUSION: Rivastigmine is a useful option for the treatment of patients with mild to moderately severe Alzheimer's disease. Although only short term (6- month) comparisons with placebo are available, given the lack of established treatment options it should be considered for first-line use in this population.     

Place and response learning in human virtual navigation: Behavioral measures and gender differences.

Two experiments examined the use of place and response strategies by humans navigating virtual multiple T mazes. In Experiment 1, probe trials revealed that participants commonly used place and response strategies, and place strategies were more frequent early in training, whereas response strategies were more frequent late in training. Compared with women, men learned the correct path through the maze more quickly and developed a more stable route through the maze. In Experiment 2, participants were trained to locate 2 targets. One target required participants to use either a place or response strategy, whereas the other target could be found using either strategy. Accuracy improved faster for place training compared with response training, and women outperformed men in both groups. Probe trials testing transfer of the imposed strategy to the other target found faster transfer for place training than for response training and that women demonstrated faster transfer than men. Accuracy on probe trials was correlated with poor route stability in the place-trained group and with good route stability in the response-trained group, indicating that navigation strategy use may be related to measures of improvement in performance on normal trials. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Candoxatril improves exercise capacity in patients with chronic heart failure receiving angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition

AIMS: To assess the effect of candoxatril, a novel neutral endopeptidase inhibitor, on exercise capacity, clinical status and quality of life in patients with mild to moderate chronic heart failure receiving angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients were recruited from 16 centres throughout the United Kingdom. Following a 4-week single-blind placebo 'run-in' phase of weekly exercise tests, patients underwent double-blind randomization to receive either candoxatril (100 mg twice daily) or placebo for the next 84 days. Patients were then reassessed every 28 days. Of 110 patients randomized, 56 received candoxatril and 54 placebo. Over the study period, the overall improvement in mean total exercise time in the candoxatril group in comparison to the placebo group was 34.1 s (P=0.02: 95% confidence interval: 5.1 to 63.0). There were no significant changes in functional class, clinical status or quality of life scores between the two groups. There was a trend for a small reduction in blood pressure in the candoxatril group. CONCLUSION: Candoxatril confers an improvement in exercise capacity in patients with chronic heart failure who are receiving maintenance angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor therapy.     

Should improvement in rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials be defined as fifty percent or seventy percent improvement in core set measures, rather than twenty percent?

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether improvement of more than 20% in core set parameters should be required before patients are characterized as improved in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) clinical trials. METHODS: Data from 6 RA trials were reanalyzed to evaluate the discriminant validity (ability to differentiate active treatment from control) of 4 proposed definitions of improvement: the current American College of Rheumatology (ACR) definition (a 20% threshold for core set parameters [ACR 201), a 50% threshold (ACR 50), a 70% threshold (ACR 70), and an ordinal definition in which a patient could be classified in any of 3 categories (unimproved, ACR 20, or ACR 50). To evaluate the discriminant validity of these 4 definitions of improvement, we characterized each patient in each trial as improved or not, based on each definition, and computed a chi-square value differentiating the active treatment group from the control group, with the corresponding P value. RESULTS: With an increase in the threshold for improvement, the percentage of placebo-treated patients who were classified as experiencing response dropped dramatically in all trials, as did the percentage of patients receiving active therapy (second-line drug, combination therapy, tumor necrosis factor p75-Fc fusion protein) who were classified as experiencing response. Generally, the drop in active treatment response rates was greater than the drop in placebo response rates, leaving the difference between the 2 groups less at the higher thresholds. Therefore, chi-square values fell as the threshold for response was raised. The ordinal definition of improvement yielded chi-square values similar to those obtained using ACR 20 alone. CONCLUSION: Adopting a definition of efficacy in RA trials that requires 50% or 70% improvement in core set parameters would likely compromise statistical power and make it more difficult to distinguish between 2 treatments with different efficacy. ACR 20 should continue to be the primary measure of efficacy in RA trials, with higher thresholds for improvement being determined and reported as secondary efficacy measures.