Tree controlled grammars

Languages are studied which can be generated by context-free grammars under a single simple restriction which must be satisfied by its derivation trees. Using tree controlled grammars (TC grammars for short) all unambigous and some inherently ambigous context-free languages, and also some non context-free languages can be parsed in timeO(n ²). The classes of regular, linear, context-free, EOL, ETOL and type 0 languages can be characterized in a natural manner using TC grammars. A context-free generator for all type 0 languages is exhibited. Some normal forms for TC grammars are established but it is shown that many common normal forms (e. g. Greibach normal form) cannot be obtained for TC grammars in general.     

On the structure of context-sensitive grammars

It is well known that the family of context-sensitive grammars generate languages which are not context-free and that it is undecidable whether a context-sensitive grammar generates a context-free language. However, the mechanism by which the use of context allows a non-context-free language to be generated is not well understood. In this paper we attempt to focus on this problem by surveying some of the results which speak to two questions: (i) What constraints can be placed on the form of the rules of context-sensitive grammars without restricting the weak generative capacity? (ii) What (nontrivial) constraints can be placed on the form of the rules of context-sensitive grammars such that only context-free languages will be generated?     

The complexity of the membership problem for some extensions of context-free languagest†

The time and tape complexity of some families of languages defined in the literature by altering methods of generation by context-free grammars is considered. Specifically; it is shown that the following families of languages can be recognized by deterministic multitape Turing machines either in polynomial time or within (log n)² tape:

1) the context independent developmental (EOL) languages;

2) the simple matrix languages;

3) the languages generated by derivation restricted state grammars.:

4) the languages generated by linear context-free grammars with certain non-regular control sets;

5) the languages generated by certain classes of vector grammars.

In fact, these languages are of the same tape complexity as context-free languages. Other results indicate the complexity of EDOL languages and the effects on complexity of applying the homomorphic replication operator to regular and context-free languages.     

On labelled graph grammars

According to the classification of labelled graph grammars by Nagl [4], it can be shown that the class of context-sensitive graph languages is equivalent to the class of context-free graph languages and the context-free graph languages properly include the regular graph languages.     

A pumping lemma for random permitting context languages

Random context grammars belong to the class of context-free grammars with regulated rewriting. Their productions depend on context that may be randomly distributed in a sentential form. Context is classified as either permitting or forbidding, where permitting context enables the application of a production and forbidding context inhibits it. For random context languages of finite index a generalization of the well-known pumping lemma for context-free languages has been proven. We drop the finite index restriction and concentrate on non-erasing grammars that use permitting context only. We prove a pumping lemma for their languages that generalizes and refines the existing one, and show that these grammars are strictly weaker than the non-erasing random context grammars.     

Highly Constrained Unification Grammars

Unification grammars are widely accepted as an expressive means for describing the structure of natural languages. In general, the recognition problem is undecidable for unification grammars. Even with restricted variants of the formalism, off-line parsable grammars, the problem is computationally hard. We present two natural constraints on unification grammars which limit their expressivity and allow for efficient processing. We first show that non-reentrant unification grammars generate exactly the class of context-free languages. We then relax the constraint and show that one-reentrant unification grammars generate exactly the class of mildly context-sensitive languages. We thus relate the commonly used and linguistically motivated formalism of unification grammars to more restricted, computationally tractable classes of languages.     

Generalised Stream X-Machines and Cooperating Distributed Grammar Systems

Stream X-machines are a general and powerful computational model. By coupling the control structure of a stream X-machine with a set of formal grammars a new machine called a generalised stream X-machine with underlying distributed grammars, acting as a translator, is obtained. By introducing this new mechanism a hierarchy of computational models is provided. If the grammars are of a particular class, say regular or context-free, then finite sets are translated into finite sets, when ?k, = k derivation strategies are used, and regular or context-free sets, respectively, are obtained for ?k, * and terminal derivation strategies. In both cases, regular or context-free grammars, the regular sets are translated into non-context-free languages. Moreover, any language accepted by a Turing machine may be written as a translation of a regular set performed by a generalised stream X-machine with underlying distributed grammars based on context-free rules, under = k derivation strategy. On the other hand the languages generated by some classes of cooperating distributed grammar systems may be obtained as images of regular sets through some X-machines with underlying distributed grammars. Other relations of the families of languages computed by generalised stream X-machines with the families of languages generated by cooperating distributed grammar systems are established. At the end, an example dealing with the specification of a scanner system illustrates the use of the introduced mechanism as a formal specification model. Received September 1999 / Accepted in revised form October 2000     

一种特殊的上下文无关文法及其语法分析

SAQ系统是一个进行软件规约获取、检验和复用的实验系统，其中以上下文无关文法表示的概念是规约的一部分.SAQ要求将概念的词法和句法定义结合在一个上下文无关文法中.如果用常规的上下文无关文法描述诸如程序设计语言和自然语言等一些复杂概念的语法，则需要把诸如空格和回车等没有实质意义的分隔符包含到语法中去(这种描述方法称为朴素表示法),使得语法描述很累赘.为此，作者设计了一种特殊的上下文无关文法,它把通常上下文无关文法定义中的非终极符集合和终极符集合进行细化.用这种文法可以相对简洁地描述程序语言和自然语言等复杂概     

Closure properties of linear context-free tree languages with an application to optimality theory

Context-free tree grammars, originally introduced by Rounds [Math. Systems Theory 4(3) (1970) 257–287], are powerful grammar devices for the definition of tree languages. The properties of the class of context-free tree languages have been studied for more than three decades now. Particularly important here is the work by Engelfriet and Schmidt [J. Comput. System Sci. 15(3) (1977) 328–353, 16(1) (1978) 67–99]. In the present paper, we consider a subclass of the class of context-free tree languages, namely the class of linear context-free tree languages. A context-free tree grammar is linear, if no rule permits the copying of subtrees. For this class of linear context-free tree languages we show that the grammar derivation mode, which is very important for the general class of context-free tree languages, is immaterial. The main result we present is the closure of the class of linear context-free tree languages under linear frontier-to-root tree transduction mappings. Two further results are the closure of this class under linear root-to-frontier tree transduction mappings and under intersection with regular tree languages.     

On the generative power of sequential and parallel programmed graph grammars

Programmed graph grammars are formally introduced and their generative power is investigated. Programmed graph grammars differ from other approaches to graph grammars in the so-called control diagram which controls the application order of productions. Restricting the form of the productions of a programmed graph grammar we get several classes of graph languages. These are compared mutually as well as with the hierarchy introduced by Nagl [18]. For unrestricted and monotone productions corresponding classes of graph languages coincide, while the class of context free programmed graph languages is properly contained in the class of context free graph languages in the sense of [18].     

On grammar forms with terminal context

Summary A context-free grammar form G defines a family of context-free grammars {ie397-01}(G). In this paper {ie397-02}(G) is extended to give the family of terminal context grammars {ie397-03}(G), which were introduced by Book [4]. It is shown that the families of languages defined by {ie397-04}(G) and {ie397-05}(G) are equal when G is an -free context-free grammar form. This generalizes the result of Book [4] for context-free grammars and underlines the usefulness of the notion of grammar forms in formal language theory.The work of the second author was carried out partially under a National Research Council of Canada Grant. No. A-7700 and partially under the auspices of the University of Karlsruhe     

Double Greibach operator grammars

Every context-free grammar can be transformed into one in double Greibach operator form, that satisfies both double Greibach form and operator form. Examination of the expressive power of various well-known subclasses of context-free grammars in double Greibach and/or operator form yields an extended hierarchy of language classes. Basic decision properties such as equivalence can be stated in stronger forms via new classes of languages in this hierarchy.     

格值下推自动机与格值上下文无关文法

引入了格值下推自动机、格值上下文无关文法及它们的语言的概念,证明了格值下推自动机以两种不同方式接受的语言类的等价性,研究了格值Chomsky范式文法、格值上下文无关文法及其派生所产生的语言的等价条件,揭示了在一定条件下,格值下推自动机接受的语言类与格值上下文无关文法产生的语言类的等价性,证明了有理格值语言均被格值下推自动机识别。     

THE COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY OF THE UNIVERSAL RECOGNITION PROBLEM FOR PARALLEL MULTIPLE CONTEXT-FREE GRAMMARS

A number of grammatical formalisms have been proposed to describe the syntax of natural languages, and the universal recognition problems for some of those classes of grammars have been studied. A universal recognition problem for a class Q of grammars is the one to decide, taking a grammar G ∈ G and a string ui as an input, whether G can generate w or not. In this paper, the computational complexities of the universal recognition problems for parallel multiple context-free grammars, multiple context-free grammars, and their subclasses are discussed.     

Context-free graph grammars and concatenation of graphs

An operation of concatenation is defined for graphs. This allows strings to be viewed as expressions denoting graphs, and string languages to be interpreted as graph languages. For a class of string languages, is the class of all graph languages that are interpretations of languages from . For the classes REG and LIN of regular and linear context-free languages, respectively, . is the smallest class of graph languages containing all singletons and closed under union, concatenation and star (of graph languages). equals the class of graph languages generated by linear HR (= Hyperedge Replacement) grammars, and is generated by the corresponding -controlled grammars. Two characterizations are given of the largest class such that . For the class CF of context-free languages, lies properly inbetween and the class of graph languages generated by HR grammars. The concatenation operation on graphs combines nicely with the sum operation on graphs. The class of context-free (or equational) graph languages, with respect to these two operations, is the class of graph languages generated by HR grammars. Received 16 October 1995 / 18 September 1996     

Generation,recognition and parsing of context-free languages by means of recursive graphs

A device called recursive graph defining context-free languages is described. Previously such a device was used byConway [1] for a compiler design.Conway called it “transition diagram”. Roughly, a recursive graph is a finite set of finite state graphs, which are used in a recursive manner. A recursive graph covers the essential features of both standard devices: It describes the syntactical structure as grammars do, and it represents a method for recognition and parsing as push-down automata do. A notion ofk-determinacy is introduced for recursive graphs and for a restricted kind of them, called simple recursive graphs. Thek-deterministic simple recursive graphs are more general thanLL (k) grammars [5] with respect to parsing-power, but equal with respect to language generation power. The more generalk-deterministic recursive graphs cannot parse the full set ofLR (k)-grammars [4], but they can recognize the full set ofLR (k)-languages. The set of languages recognized by (simple) recursive graphs is the set of context-free languages.     

Spinal-Formed Context-Free Tree Grammars

In this paper we introduce a restricted model of context-free tree grammars called spine grammars, and study their formal properties including considerably simple normal forms. Recent research on natural languages has suggested that formalisms for natural languages need to generate a slightly larger class of languages than context-free grammars, and for that reason tree adjoining grammars have been widely studied relating them to natural languages. It is shown that the class of string languages generated by spine grammars coincides with that of tree adjoining grammars. We also introduce acceptors called linear pushdown tree automata, and show that linear pushdown tree automata accept exactly the class of tree languages generated by spine grammars. Linear pushdown tree automata are obtained from pushdown tree automata with a restriction on duplicability for the pushdown stacks. Received May 29, 1998, and in revised form April 27, 1999, and in final form May 10, 1999.     

On the synchronized derivation depth of context-free grammars

We consider depth of derivations as a complexity measure for synchronized and ordinary context-free grammars. This measure differs from the earlier considered synchronization depth in that it counts the depth of the entire derivation tree. We consider (non-)existence of trade-offs when using synchronized grammars as opposed to non-synchronized grammars and establish lower bounds for certain classes of linear context-free languages.     

Petri net algorithms in the theory of matrix grammars

This paper shows that the languages over a one-letter alphabet generated by context-free matrix grammars are always regular. Moreover we give a decision procedure for the question of whether a context-free matrix language is finite. Hereby we strengthen a result of [Mk 92] and settle a number of open questions in [DP 89]. Both results are obtained by a reduction to Petri net problems.