Mechanisms of luminal enlargement and quantification of vessel wall trauma following balloon coronary angioplasty and directional atherectomy

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the dual action of lumen enlargement and vessel wall damage following either balloon angioplasty or directional atherectomy, using intracoronary ultrasound, and angioscopy. BACKGROUND: Differences in the mechanisms of action of balloon angioplasty and directional atherectomy may have a significant bearing on the immediate outcome and the restenosis rate at 6 months. METHODS: A total of 36 patients were studied before and after either balloon angioplasty (n = 18) or directional atherectomy (n = 18). Ultrasound measurements included changes in lumen area, external elastic membrane area and plaque burden. In addition, the presence and extent of dissections were assessed to derive a damage score. Angioscopic assessment of the dilated or atherectomized stenotic lesions was translated into semi-quantitative dissection, thrombus and haemorrhage scores. RESULTS: Atherectomy patients had a larger angiographic vessel size compared with the angioplasty group (3.55 +/- 0.46 mm vs 3.00 +/- 0.64 mm, P < 0.05); however, minimal lumen diameter (1.18 +/- 0.96 mm vs 0.85 +/- 0.49 mm) and plaque burden (17.04 +/- 3.69 vs 15.23 +/- 4.92 mm2) measurements did not differ significantly. As a result of plaque reduction, atherectomy produced a larger increase in luminal area than the angioplasty group (5.80 +/- 1.78 mm2 vs 2.44 +/- 1.36 mm2, P < 0.0001). Lumen increase after angioplasty was the result of 'plaque compression' (50%) and wall stretching (50%). Additionally, in both groups there was indirect angioscopic evidence of thrombus 'microembolization' as an adjunctive mechanism of lumen enlargement. Angioscopy identified big flaps in six and small intimal flaps in 11 of the atherectomized patients as compared with five and 12 patients in the angioplasty group. Changes in thrombus score following both coronary interventions were identical (0.72 +/- 3.42 points atherectomy vs -0.38 +/- 3.27 points balloon angioplasty, ns). CONCLUSIONS: Lumen enlargement after directional atherectomy is mainly achieved by plaque removal (87%), whereas balloon dilation is the result of vessel wall stretching (50%) and plaque reduction (50%). Despite the fact that the luminal gain achieved by directional atherectomy is twice that achieved with balloon angioplasty, the extent of trauma induced by both techniques seems to be similar.     

Coronary-artery stenting compared with balloon angioplasty for restenosis after initial balloon angioplasty. Restenosis Stent Study Group

BACKGROUND: Intracoronary stenting reduces the rate of restenosis after angioplasty in patients with new coronary lesions. We conducted a prospective, randomized, multicenter study to determine whether intracoronary stenting, as compared with standard balloon angioplasty, reduces the recurrence of luminal narrowing in restenotic lesions. METHODS: A total of 383 patients who had undergone at least one balloon angioplasty and who had clinical and angiographic evidence of restenosis after the procedure were randomly assigned to undergo standard balloon angioplasty (192 patients) or intracoronary stenting with a Palmaz-Schatz stent (191 patients). The primary end point was angiographic evidence of restenosis (defined as stenosis of more than 50 percent of the luminal diameter) at six months. The secondary end points were death, Q-wave myocardial infarction, bypass surgery, and revascularization of the target vessel. RESULTS: The rate of restenosis was significantly higher in the angioplasty group than in the stent group (32 percent as compared with 18 percent, P= 0.03). Revascularization of the target vessel at six months was required in 27 percent of the angioplasty group but in only 10 percent of the stent group (P=0.001). This difference resulted from a smaller mean (+/-SD) minimal luminal diameter in the angioplasty group (1.85+/-0.56 mm) than in the stent group (2.04+/-0.66 mm), with a mean difference of 0.19 mm (P=0.01) at follow-up. Subacute thrombosis occurred in 0.6 percent of the angioplasty group and in 3.9 percent of the stent group. The rate of event-free survival at 250 days was 72 percent in the angioplasty group and 84 percent in the stent group (P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Elective coronary stenting was effective in the treatment of restenosis after balloon angioplasty. Stenting resulted in a lower rate of recurrent stenosis despite a higher incidence of subacute thrombosis.     

Are directional coronary atherectomy and Palmaz-Schatz stent more efficacious than conventional balloon angioplasty for treating de novo coronary artery lesions?

It is unclear whether new devices such as directional coronary atherectomy (DCA) or Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation improve long-term outcomes compared with conventional balloon angioplasty in patients with stable angina and de novo coronary artery lesions of type A or type B except for complete occlusive lesions investigated by the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. A total of 146 patients with stable angina and simple lesions were assigned to either conventional balloon angioplasty (62 patients), DCA (50 patients), or Palmaz-Schatz implantation (34 patients). The acute results and late outcomes were assessed by coronary angiography. The results of the three procedures were similar with respect to procedural success and complications. Patients who underwent stenting or DCA had a larger immediate increase in the diameter of the lumen and a larger luminal diameter immediately after the procedure than those who underwent balloon angioplasty. At six months follow-up, the patients treated by stenting continued to have a larger luminal diameter and a lower rate of restenosis than those treated with balloon angioplasty (2.30 +/- 0.66 vs 1.85 +/- 0.83 mm, p < 0.005; 5.9% vs 29%, p < 0.05) and DCA (2.30 +/- 0.66 vs 1.90 +/- 0.96 mm, p < 0.05; 5.9% vs 24%, NS). The patients treated with balloon angioplasty had a smaller late loss than those treated with DCA or Palmaz-Schatz stent. The patients treated with DCA had a larger loss index than those treated with balloon angioplasty or Palmaz-Schatz stent. Stenting was a significant factor in decreasing the rate of restenosis by logistic regression analysis, compared with balloon angioplasty. The angiographic outcomes were better in patients who received a stent than in those who received other treatments. This study suggests that even lesions stable for treatment by balloon angioplasty and DCA can also be treated with Palmaz-Schatz stents.     

Impact of diabetes mellitus on percutaneous revascularization (CAVEAT-I). CAVEAT-I Investigators. Coronary Angioplasty Versus Excisional Atherectomy Trial

We examined the relation between diabetes mellitus and outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularization in the Coronary Angioplasty Versus Excisional Atherectomy Trial (CAVEAT-I), a randomized trial comparing treatment with either percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty or directional atherectomy for de novo lesions in native coronary arteries. Acute success and complication rates, 6-month angiographic restenosis rates, and 1-year clinical outcomes were compared between diabetic and nondiabetic patients undergoing each procedure. Acute success rates between diabetic (n = 191) and nondiabetic (n = 821) patients were similar for both revascularization techniques. Except for the need for dialysis, complication rates were also similar. Six months after atherectomy, diabetic patients had significantly more angiographic restenosis than nondiabetics (59.7% vs 47.4%) and significantly smaller minimum luminal diameters (1.20 vs 1.40 mm). Diabetics undergoing atherectomy required more frequent bypass surgery (12.8% vs 8.5%) and more repeat percutaneous revascularizations (36.5% vs 28.1%) than nondiabetics undergoing atherectomy. Restenosis rates, minimum luminal diameters and repeat revascularizations between diabetics and nondiabetics undergoing angioplasty were similar. The higher restenosis and repeat revascularization rates and the smaller minimum luminal diameter at follow-up in diabetic patients suggest that atherectomy may provide only modest benefit for these patients. The increased restenosis rate in diabetics undergoing atherectomy (but not angioplasty) requires further evaluation.     

Excimer laser angioplasty versus balloon angioplasty in functional and total coronary occlusions

Registries of excimer laser coronary angioplasty have reported good results in the treatment of complex coronary artery disease, including total or subtotal coronary occlusions. One hundred three patients (103 lesions) with a functional or total coronary occlusion were included in a randomized trial (Amsterdam-Rotterdam [AMRO] trial, total of 308 patients), 49 patients were allocated to laser angioplasty and 54 patients to balloon angioplasty. The primary clinical end points were death, myocardial infarction, coronary bypass surgery, or repeated coronary angioplasty of the randomized segment during a 6-month follow-up period. The primary angiographic end point was the minimal lumen diameter at follow-up in relation to the baseline value (net gain), as determined by an automated contour-detection algorithm. Laser angioplasty was followed by balloon angioplasty in all procedures. The angiographic success rate was 65% in patients treated with excimer laser-assisted balloon angioplasty compared with 61% in patients treated with balloon angioplasty alone. No deaths occurred. There were no significant differences between the laser angioplasty group and the balloon angioplasty group in the incidence of myocardial infarctions (1 patient vs 3, respectively, p = 0.36), coronary bypass surgery (4 patients vs 2, respectively, p = 0.34), repeat angioplasty (10 patients vs 8, respectively, p = 0.46) or primary clinical end point (15 patients vs 12, respectively, p = 0.34). The net gain in minimal lumen diameter and restenosis rate (>50% diameter stenosis at follow-up) were 0.81 +/- 0.74 mm and 66.7%, respectively, in patients treated with laser angioplasty compared with 1.04 +/- 0.68 mm and 48.5%, respectively, in patients treated with balloon angioplasty (p = 0.59 and p = 0.15, respectively). Excimer laser-assisted balloon angioplasty demonstrated no benefit over balloon angioplasty with respect to initial and long-term clinical and angiographic outcome in the treatment of patients with functional or total coronary occlusions of >10 mm in length.     

Bimodal distribution of angiographic measures of restenosis six months after coronary stent placement

BACKGROUND: Restenosis has been perceived as the tail end of a normal distribution of the response of the vessel to the intervention. However, recent studies have described a bimodal distribution for de novo lesions after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. This finding suggests that some lesions may be more susceptible for restenosis. Whether this holds true for a wider spectrum of lesions undergoing stent placement is not yet known. The present study analyzes the frequency distribution of angiographic indexes of restenosis 6 months after coronary stent implantation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Quantitative angiographic evaluation was performed in 1084 lesions of 1084 patients before, immediately after, and 6 months after successful Palmaz-Schatz stent placement; this represented 80.4% of patients eligible for follow-up angiography. Principal end points of the analysis were angiographic indexes of restenosis at 6 months. Twenty-two lesions that became totally occluded at follow-up were excluded from most parts of the analysis. Diameter stenosis, minimal luminal diameter (MLD), and lumen loss at 6 months did not follow a normal pattern; the bimodal pattern was demonstrated through deconvolution that yielded two separate normal components delineating two lesion populations, which developed distinctively different degrees of lumen renarrowing. The first and larger subgroup of lesions, which was less prone to restenosis, was centered around a mean value of 27% for diameter stenosis and 2.19 mm for MLD, whereas the second subgroup, with a greater tendency for restenosis, was situated around a mean value of 68% for diameter stenosis and 0.76 mm for MLD. The intersection point between the two theoretical normal distribution components was 53.5% for diameter stenosis and 1.09 mm for MLD at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Frequency-distribution curves of angiographic indexes of restenosis after coronary stent placement have a bimodal pattern, suggesting the existence of two distinct populations with different propensity to restenosis. These findings may encourage future efforts for the timely identification of the subset with a higher risk as the target of specific antirestenotic strategies.     

Stent placement compared with balloon angioplasty for obstructed coronary bypass grafts. Saphenous Vein De Novo Trial Investigators

BACKGROUND: Treatment of stenosis in saphenous-vein grafts after coronary-artery bypass surgery is a difficult challenge. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of stent placement with those of balloon angioplasty on clinical and angiographic outcomes in patients with obstructive disease of saphenous-vein grafts. METHODS: A total of 220 patients with new lesions in aortocoronary-venous bypass grafts were randomly assigned to placement of Palmaz-Schatz stents or standard balloon angioplasty. Coronary angiography was performed during the index procedure and six months later. RESULTS: As compared with the patients assigned to angioplasty, those assigned to stenting had a higher rate of procedural efficacy, defined as a reduction in stenosis to less than 50 percent of the vessel diameter without a major cardiac complication (92 percent vs. 69 percent, P<0.001), but they had more frequent hemorrhagic complications (17 percent vs. 5 percent, P<0.01). Patients in the stent group had a larger mean (+/-SD) increase in luminal diameter immediately after the procedure (1.92+/-0.30 mm, as compared with 1.21+/-0.37 mm in the angioplasty group; P<0.001) and a greater mean net gain in luminal diameter at six months (0.85+/-0.96 vs. 0.54+/-0.91 mm, P=0.002). Restenosis occurred in 37 percent of the patients in the stent group and in 46 percent of the patients in the angioplasty group (P=0.24). The outcome in terms of freedom from death, myocardial infarction, repeated bypass surgery, or revascularization of the target lesion was significantly better in the stent group (73 percent vs. 58 percent, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: As compared with balloon angioplasty, stenting of selected venous bypass-graft lesions resulted in superior procedural outcomes, a larger gain in luminal diameter, and a reduction in major cardiac events. However, there was no significant benefit in the rate of angiographic restenosis, which was the primary end point of the study.     

Directional coronary atherectomy for the treatment of Palmaz-Schatz in-stent restenosis

Management of in-stent restenosis has become a significant challenge in interventional cardiology. The results of balloon angioplasty have been disappointing due to the high recurrence of restenosis at follow-up. Debulking of the restenotic tissue within the stents using directional coronary atherectomy (DCA) may offer a therapeutic advantage. We report the immediate clinical and angiographic outcomes and long-term clinical follow-up results of 45 patients (46 lesions), mean age 63+/-12 years, 73% men, with a mean reference diameter of 2.9+/-0.6 mm, treated with DCA for symptomatic Palmaz-Schatz in-stent restenosis. DCA was performed successfully in all 46 lesions and resulted in a postprocedural minimal luminal diameter of 2.7+/-0.7 mm and a residual diameter stenosis of 17+/-10%. There were no in-hospital deaths, Q-wave myocardial infarctions, or emergency coronary artery bypass surgeries. Four patients (9%) suffered a non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. Target lesion revascularization was 28.3% at a mean follow-up of 10+/-4.6 months. Kaplan-Meier event-free survival (freedom from death, myocardial infarction, and repeat target lesion revascularization) was 71.2% and 64.7% at 6 and 12 months after DCA, respectively. Thus, DCA is safe and efficacious for the treatment of Palmaz-Schatz in-stent restenosis. It results in a large postprocedural minimal luminal diameter and a low rate of both target lesion revascularization and combined major clinical events at follow-up.     

Laser angioplasty and recanalization

Percutaneous transluminal coronary balloon angioplasty (PTCA) still is the most frequently applied interventional technique for treatment of coronary artery disease. Plastic deformation of the obstructive plaque with creation of splits, intimal tears and dissections is the main mechanism of PTCA for lumen widening. As a result, acute complications due to flow limiting dissections and acute vessel closure can unpredictably occur resulting in myocardial infarction, urgent bypass surgery and death. Furthermore, long-term success of PTCA is limited by restenosis. In order to overcome these limitations of PTCA, alternative interventional techniques were developed, which instead of deforming the obstructive plaque ablate this tissue. These techniques include high and low speed rotational angioplasty, directional atherectomy, the transluminal extraction catheter, ultrasound angioplasty and laser (Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation) angioplasty. 308 nm XeCl excimer laser angioplasty today is the laser technique of choice for clinical application. This pulsed laser requires direct contact to the obstructive plaque. It creates fast (< 200 microseconds) expanding gas bubbles which induce plaque ablation. Main indications for 308 nm XeCl excimer laser angioplasty are diffuse and long coronary lesions and total coronary occlusions. Despite promising initial results this technique showed no better acute and long-term results in comparison to PTCA for the treatment of these types of lesions ("Amsterdam-Rotterdam" Study, "Excimer Rotational Balloon Angioplasty Comparison" Study). As a result, this interventional technique was rarely applied for patient treatment. More recently, the concept of plaque ablation by 308 nm XeCl excimer laser angioplasty was renewed for the treatment of in-stent restenosis. This indication is being investigated in the "Laser Angioplasty of Restenosed Stents" trial. First results document the practicability and safety of this approach. Long-term results are awaited. With ongoing miniaturization, laser guidewires were developed for the recanalization of chronic total occlusions. The randomized multicenter "Total Occlusion Trial with Angioplasty assisted by Laser guidewire "Study documented a success rate of laser wire recanalization in up to 66% in contrast to 47.5% for mechanical wires only. Long-term results are still awaited. Technical and procedural progress including saline flush during laser application, homogeneous light distribution and the concept of smooth laser ablation is pushed foreward to make excimer laser angioplasty safer, more predictable and more effective.     

Optimal coronary balloon angioplasty with provisional stenting versus primary stent (OCBAS): immediate and long-term follow-up results

OBJECTIVE: This study sought to compare two strategies of revascularization in patients obtaining a good immediate angiographic result after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA): elective stenting versus optimal PTCA. A good immediate angiographic result with provisional stenting was considered to occur only if early loss in minimal luminal diameter (MLD) was documented at 30 min post-PTCA angiography. BACKGROUND: Coronary stenting reduces restenosis in lesions exhibiting early deterioration (>0.3 mm) in MLD within the first 24 hours (early loss) after successful PTCA. Lesions with no early loss after PTCA have a low restenosis rate. METHODS: To compare angiographic restenosis and target vessel revascularization (TVR) of lesions treated with coronary stenting versus those treated with optimal PTCA, 116 patients were randomized to stent (n=57) or to optimal PTCA (n=59). After randomization in the PTCA group, 13.5% of the patients crossed over to stent due to early loss (provisional stenting). RESULTS: Baseline demographic and angiographic characteristics were similar in both groups of patients. At 7.6 months, 96.6% of the entire population had a follow-up angiographic study: 98.2% in the stent and 94.9% in the PTCA group. Immediate and follow-up angiographic data showed that acute gain was significantly higher in the stent than in the PTCA group (1.95 vs. 1.5 mm; p < 0.03). However, late loss was significantly higher in the stent than the PTCA group (0.63+/-0.59 vs. 0.26+/-0.44, respectively; p=0.01). Hence, net gain with both techniques was similar (1.32< or =0.3 vs. 1.24+/-0.29 mm for the stent and the PTCA groups, respectively; p=NS). Angiographic restenosis rate at follow-up (19.2% in stent vs. 16.4% in PTCA; p=NS) and TVR (17.5% in stent vs. 13.5% in PTCA; p=NS) were similar. Furthermore, event-free survival was 80.8% in the stent versus 83.1% in the PTCA group (p=NS). Overall costs (hospital and follow-up) were US $591,740 in the stent versus US $398,480 in the PTCA group (p < 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The strategy of PTCA with delay angiogram and provisional stent if early loss occurs had similar restenosis rate and TVR, but lower cost than primary stenting after PTCA.     

Effect of nadroparin, a low-molecular-weight heparin, on clinical and angiographic restenosis after coronary balloon angioplasty: the FACT study. Fraxiparine Angioplastie Coronaire Transluminale

BACKGROUND: Experimental studies suggest that the antiproliferative effect of heparin after arterial injury is maximized by pretreatment. No previous studies of restenosis have used a pretreatment strategy. We designed this study to determine whether treatment with nadroparin, a low-molecular-weight heparin, started 3 days before the procedure and continued for 3 months, affected angiographic restenosis or clinical outcome after coronary angioplasty. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a prospective multicenter, double-blind, randomized trial, elective coronary angioplasty was performed on 354 patients who were treated with daily subcutaneous nadroparin (0.6 mL of 10,250 anti-Xa IU/mL) or placebo injections started 3 days before angioplasty and continued for 3 months. Angiography was performed just before and immediately after angioplasty and at follow-up. The primary study end point was angiographic restenosis, assessed by quantitative coronary angiography 3 months after balloon angioplasty. Clinical follow-up was continued up to 6 months. Clinical and procedural variables and the occurrence of periprocedural complications did not differ between groups. At angiographic follow-up, the mean minimal lumen diameter and the mean residual stenosis in the nadroparin group (1.37+/-0.66 mm, 51.9+/-21.0%) did not differ from the corresponding values in the control group (1.48+/-0.59 mm, 48.8+/-18.9%). Combined major cardiac-related clinical events (death, myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization) did not differ between groups (30.3% versus 29.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Pretreatment with the low-molecular-weight heparin nadroparin continued for 3 months after balloon angioplasty had no beneficial effect on angiographic restenosis or on adverse clinical outcomes.     

Mechanical debulking versus balloon angioplasty for the treatment of true bifurcation lesions

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare the immediate angiographic and long-term results of debulking versus balloon angioplasty for treatment of true bifurcation lesions. BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown true bifurcation lesions to be a high risk morphological subset for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). Although atherectomy devices have been used to treat bifurcation lesions, no studies have compared the outcomes of these alternative treatment modalities. METHODS: Between January 1992 and May 1997, we treated 70 consecutive patients with true bifurcation lesions (defined as a greater than 50% stenosis in both the parent vessel and contiguous side branch) with conventional PTCA (n = 30) or debulking (with rotational or directional atherectomy) plus adjunctive PTCA (n = 40). Paired angiograms were analyzed by quantitative angiography, and clinical follow-up was obtained in all patients. RESULTS: Acute procedural success was 73% in the PTCA group and 97% in the debulking group (p = 0.01). Major in-hospital complications occurred in two patients in the PTCA group and one in the debulking group. Treatment with atherectomy plus PTCA resulted in lower postprocedure residual stenoses than PTCA alone (16+/-15% vs. 33+/-17% in the parent vessel, and 6+/-15% vs. 39+/-22% in the side branch; p < 0.001 for both comparisons). At 1 year follow-up, the incidence of target vessel revascularization (TVR) was 53% in the PTCA group as compared with 28% in the debulking group (p = 0.05). Independent predictors of the need for repeat TVR were side branch diameter >2.3 mm, longer lesion lengths, and treatment with PTCA alone. CONCLUSIONS: For the treatment of true bifurcation lesions, atherectomy with adjunctive PTCA is safe, improves acute angiographic results, and decreases target vessel revascularization compared to PTCA alone. The benefits of debulking for bifurcation lesions were especially seen in lesions involving large side branches.     

Comparison of balloon angioplasty versus debulking devices versus stenting in right coronary ostial lesions

Angioplasty of aorto-ostial stenosis is associated with lower procedural success and a higher complication rate. The aim of the present study was to compare the acute and long-term results of balloon and new device angioplasty in 110 consecutive patients with right coronary ostial lesions. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to the angioplasty device used: group I (balloon only, n = 26), group II (debulking devices including excimer laser, directional and rotational atherectomy, n = 26), group III (stent, n = 58). Procedural success was highest in group III (96%) followed by group I (88%), and group II (77%). In-hospital complications were similar among the groups (p = NS). Patients in group III achieved the highest acute gain (2.61 mm) followed by groups II (1.92 mm), and I (1.39 mm, p <0.05). During follow up, target lesion revascularization and/or bypass surgery was required in 24% of patients in group III compared with 47% and 40% in groups I and II, respectively (p <0.05). Cardiac-event free survival was highest in the stent group (74%, p <0.005) and was similar between the balloon (39%) and debulking device groups (45%). Thus, among the currently available technologies, stenting of right coronary ostial lesions appears to provide excellent angiographic and long-term results.     

Restenosis after coronary angioplasty

Coronary angioplasty is used to treat coronary disease in many patients. Indications for angioplasty have expanded since it was first performed, mainly as a result of improvement in equipment and techniques. One problem with coronary angioplasty is the phenomenon of renarrowing of the treated coronary lesion, a process called restenosis. The events that constitute restenosis appear to be a universal response to the arterial wall injury of angioplasty. They are currently characterized as follows: platelet adhesion and aggregation on the damaged endothelium and within deep splits into the tunica media; release of platelet-derived growth factors; inflammation of the mechanically injured medial zone; transformation of smooth muscle cells of the tunica media after their activation by several of the growth-promoting substances; migration and proliferation of transformed smooth muscle cells, with secretion of copious amounts of extracellular matrix material; and, finally, termination of the growth process with regrowth of endothelium over the injured area. A decade of research work has helped identify clinical correlates of restenosis after coronary angioplasty procedures. This work is hindered by lack of a uniform angiographic definition of restenosis. In addition, much of the information has come from small studies, with incomplete follow-up and retrospective orientation. Nevertheless, some data are available. Patient-related correlates include male gender, unstable angina, diabetes, and continued smoking after angioplasty. Lesion-related correlates include multilesional and multivessel procedures, higher postangioplasty residual stenosis, proximal vessel location, location in the left anterior descending artery, location in a vein graft, long lesions, and total occlusions. The only consistent procedure-related correlate has been incorrect sizing of the angioplasty balloon to the treated artery. For the purposes of individual patient care, clinical correlates are not helpful. No group of variables has been found to be associated with complete freedom from restenosis, and no group is completely predictive of restenosis. All patients undergoing angioplasty procedures require some follow-up through subsequent months and years. Symptom status and the results of noninvasive studies have been investigated for purposes of follow-up. Symptoms are virtually useless by themselves for predicting restenosis or its absence. When symptom status is combined with exercise thallium 201 scintigraphy performed 4 to 6 months after an angioplasty procedure, the two factors are less than ideal but have a negative predictive value of more than 90%. This means that more than 90% of patients who have neither symptoms nor evidence of ischemia by thallium 201 scintigraphy will not have angiographic restenosis.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Coronary artery restenosis after balloon angioplasty in humans is associated with circumferential coronary constriction

Therapies that inhibit intimal hyperplasia do not prevent restenosis after coronary artery balloon angioplasty, suggesting that additional mechanisms may be responsible for restenosis in humans. Using an intravascular ultrasound (Hewlett-Packard Sonos Intravascular Imaging System). 3.5F, 30-MHz (Boston Scientific) monorail imaging catheter, we studied 17 patients with clinical and angiographic restenosis at an average (mean +/- SD) of 7 +/- 6 months after balloon angioplasty (13 men age, 71 +/- 10 years; 12 left anterior descending coronary arteries, 4 right coronary arteries, and 1 left circumflex coronary artery) The lumen area (L.A), vessel wall area (VWA), and total cross-sectional area (CSA) within the external elastic lamina were measured at the restenosis site and at proximal and distal reference sites, which were defined as adjacent segments with the least amount of plaque. Consistent with coronary angiography findings, decreased LA at the restenotic site was detected in all 17 patients. The unique finding was that total CSA at the restenotic site was significantly decreased compared with both proximal and distal reference sites (10.1 +/- 2.4 versus 14.8 +/- 3.2 mm2 and 10.1 +/- 2.4 versus 13.8 +/- 3.1 mm2, respectively, P < .001), whereas VWA (intima plus media) was slightly increased at the angioplasty site compared with both proximal and distal reference sites (8.0 +/- 2.3 versus 7.6 +/- 2.3 mm2 and 8.0 +/- 2.3 versus 6.7 +/- 2.3 mm2, respectively, P = NS). Eighty-three percent of the loss in LA at the restenotic site was due to constriction of the total CSA, while the increase in VWA at the restenotic site accounted for only a 17% loss in LA. We then compared these results with the morphology of coronary artery segments in 14 patients without restenosis. These coronary artery segments had been previously treated with balloon angioplasty (7 +/- 5 months). Unlike that in restenotic lesions, the total CSA within the external elastic lamina at the sites of previous angioplasty was similar to that in distal and proximal reference sites (P = NS). Significant and consistent reduction in arterial CSA, with a minor increase in VWA, characterizes human coronary lesions that cause angiographic restenosis. These data suggest that in humans, "recoil" and/or vascular contraction with healing in response to balloon injury is a major contributor to restenosis after balloon angioplasty.     

The relation between multiple sleep latency test findings and the frequency of apneic events in REM and non-REM sleep

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the immediate results and the 6-month angiographic recurrent restenosis rate after balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis. BACKGROUND: Despite excellent immediate and mid-term results, 20% to 30% of patients with coronary stent implantation will present an angiographic restenosis and may require additional treatment. The optimal treatment for in-stent restenosis is still unclear. METHODS: Quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) analyses were performed before and after stent implantation, before and after balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis and on a 6-month systematic coronary angiogram to assess the recurrent angiographic restenosis rate. RESULTS: Balloon angioplasty was performed in 52 patients presenting in-stent restenosis. In-stent restenosis was either diffuse (> or =10 mm) inside the stent (71%) or focal (29%). Mean stent length was 16+/-7 mm. Balloon diameter of 2.98+/-0.37 mm and maximal inflation pressure of 10+/-3 atm were used for balloon angioplasty. Angiographic success rate was 100% without any complication. Acute gain was lower after balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis than after stent implantation: 1.19+/-0.60 mm vs. 1.75+/-0.68 mm (p=0.0002). At 6-month follow-up, 60% of patients were asymptomatic and no patient died. Eighteen patients (35%) had repeat target vessel revascularization. Angiographic restenosis rate was 54%. Recurrent restenosis rate was higher when in-stent restenosis was diffuse: 63% vs. 31% when focal, p=0.046. CONCLUSIONS: Although balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis can be safely and successfully performed, it leads to less immediate stenosis improvement than at time of stent implantation and carries a high recurrent angiographic restenosis rate at 6 months, in particular in diffuse in-stent restenosis lesions.     

Primary stenting of de novo lesions in small coronary arteries: a prospective, pilot study

Technical advancement and new anti-thrombotic regimens have recently shown so much improvement in the results of coronary stenting that the conventional contra-indication for stenting in small coronary arteries (<3 mm) needs to be revised. We undertook a prospective pilot study of elective Palmaz-Schatz stenting in de novo lesions located in coronary arteries of less than 3 mm diameter. Fifty consecutive patients (63 +/- 9 years) with stable (n = 38) and unstable angina (n = 12) were included. Philips-DCI quantitative coronary analysis was used to measure reference diameter, minimal lumen diameter and percent diameter stenosis before PTCA, after stenting and at 6-month angiographic follow-up study. All measurements were performed after intracoronary injection of nitroglycerin (300 microg). All patients received ticlopidine (250 mg/day) and aspirin (100 mg/day). The mean lesion length was 9 +/- 3 mm. The balloon size used for stent delivery was 2.75 mm in 30 patients and 2.5 mm in 20 patients and the mean balloon inflation pressure used for stent deployment was 12 +/- 2 atm. All stents were deployed successfully. In-hospital complications occurred in two patients, diagonal branch occlusion at day 2 requiring emergency PTCA in one and a hematoma at the femoral puncture site requiring surgery in the other. Major adverse cardiac event (MACE) rate remained 2% (nonfatal infarct in one). Follow-up angiography (n = 46, 92%) at 6 +/- 3 months showed a 30% restenosis rate. Target vessel revascularization (TVR) rate was 13%. We conclude that elective stenting in small coronary arteries is feasible and involves an acceptable risk of restenosis.     

The prevention and treatment for restenosis in coronary angioplasty

Since the invention of Gruentzig AR in 1977, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) has become a widely accepted therapeutic modality for the treatment of patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD). Restenosis which occurs within six months is a major problem of PTCA. Several clinical trials of pharmacological regimen have failed to show significant improvements in restenosis. Palmaz-Schatz stent could improve in restenosis. STRESS and BENESTENT DCA also could improve in restenosis when aggressive debulking was succeeded (BOAT and OARS). The recent IVUS studies have demonstrated that vessel remodeling (vessel shrinking) was the major factor of restenosis. Stent contributes to the prevention of the vessel shrinking, which leads to the improvement in restenosis. However, the rapid increase in stent implantation rates with widening indications cancels the beneficial effect of stent.     

Procedural outcome and follow-up results of balloon angioplasty versus new device interventions for treatment of true bifurcation stenoses

Strategies for dilatation of bifurcation stenoses have continued to evolve over the past several years. However, there is limited experience on the efficacy of various nonballoon interventional devices and their results in comparison with balloon angioplasty. We, therefore, analysed our data in 72 patients of coronary artery disease with true bifurcation stenoses with balloon angioplasty or new device interventions (NDI). All patients underwent dilatation of both the primary vessel and side branch ostial stenosis. Balloon angioplasty using double guidewire with sequential or simultaneous (kissing balloon) balloon inflation in the two vessels was performed in 42 patients. Thirty patients underwent NDI, using directional coronary atherectomy (DCA) in 12, rotablation in 6 and elective coronary stents in 12 patients. There were no significant differences in the baseline clinical and angiographic variables between patients in the two groups. While the preprocedural luminal diameter stenosis was similar, the residual stenosis was significantly less, both in the primary vessel and side branch, after NDI compared to balloon angioplasty. The procedure was successful in 96.6 percent patients treated with NDI and 83.3 percent with balloon angioplasty (p < 0.01) with relief of obstruction in both branches without any major complications. Freedom from subsequent coronary events in the form of angina, myocardial infarction, PTCA, bypass graft surgery of death was significantly more, both at 6 months (92% versus 65.6%, p < 0.001) and 12 months (81.8% versus 53.1%, p < 0.001) in the group of patients treated with NDI compared to balloon angioplasty. It is, therefore, concluded that NDI including DCA, rotablation and elective stenting are associated with higher rate of success, lesser complications and better event-free survival in comparison to balloon angioplasty for treatment of true bifurcation stenoses.     

Short- and long-term clinical and quantitative angiographic results with the new, less shortening Wallstent for vessel reconstruction in chronic total occlusion: a quantitative angiographic study

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to examine whether oversized implantation of the new, less shortening Wallstent provides a more favorable long-term clinical and angiographic outcome in chronic total occlusions than does conventional coronary balloon angioplasty. BACKGROUND: Restenosis and reocclusion remain major limitations of balloon angioplasty for chronic total occlusions. Enforced mechanical remodeling by implantation of the oversized Wallstent may prevent elastic recoil and improve accommodation of intimal hyperplasia. METHODS: Lumen dimension was measured by a computer-based quantitative coronary angiography system (CAAS II). These measurements (before and after intervention and at 6-month follow-up) were compared between the groups with Wallstent implantation (20 lesions, 20 patients) and conventional balloon angioplasty (266 lesions, 249 patients) for treatment of chronic total occlusion. Acute gain (minimal lumen diameter after intervention minus that before intervention), late loss (minimal lumen diameter after intervention minus that at follow-up) and net gain (acute gain minus late loss) were examined. RESULTS: Wallstent deployment was successful in all patients. High pressure intra-Wallstent balloon inflation (mean +/- SD 14 +/- 3 atm) was performed in all lesions. Although vessel size did not differ between the Wallstent and balloon angioplasty groups, acute gain was significantly greater in the Wallstent group (2.96 +/- 0.55 vs. 1.61 +/- 0.34 mm, p < 0.0001). Although late loss was also significantly larger in the Wallstent group (0.81 +/- 0.95 vs. 0.43 +/- 0.68 mm, p < 0.05), net gain was still significantly greater in this group (2.27 +/- 1.00 vs. 1.18 +/- 0.69 mm, p < 0.0001). Angiographic restenosis (> or = 50% diameter stenosis) occurred at 6 months in 29% of lesions in the Wallstent group and in 45% of those in the balloon angioplasty group (p = 0.5150). CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of the oversized Wallstent, with full coverage of the lesion length, ensures resetting of the vessel size to its original caliber before disease and allows greater accommodation of intimal hyperplasia and chronic vessel recoil. Wallstent implantation provides a more favorable short- and long-term clinical and angiographic outcome than does conventional balloon angioplasty for chronic total occlusions.