A Consistent Causality-Based View on a Timed Process Algebra Including Urgent Interactions

This paper discusses a timed variant of a process algebra akin to LOTOS, baptized UPA, in a causality-based setting. Two timed features are incorporated—a delay function which constrains the occurrence time of atomic actions and an urgency operator that forces (local or synchronized) actions to happen urgently. Timeouts are typical urgent phenomena. A novel timed extension of event structures is introduced and used as a vehicle to provide a denotational causality-based semantics for UPA. Recursion is dealt with by using standard fixpoint theory. In addition, an operational semantics is presented based on separate time- and action-transitions that is shown to be consistent with the event structure semantics. An interleaving semantics for UPA is immediately obtained from the operational semantics. By adopting this dual approach the well-developed timed interleaving view is extended with a consistent timed partial order view and a comparison is facilitated of the partial order model and the variety of existing (interleaved) timed process algebras.     

Metric completion versus ideal completion

Complete partial orders have been used for a long time for defining semantics of programming languages. In the context of concurrency de Bakker and Zucker (1982) proposed a metric setting for handling concurrency, recursion and nontermination, which has proved to be very successful in many applications. Starting with a semantic domain D for ‘finite behaviour’ we investigate the relation between the ideal completion Idl(D) and the metric completion which are both suitable to model recursion and infinite behaviour. We also consider the properties of semantic operators.     

Metric semantics from partial order semantics

In dealing with denotational semantics of programming languages partial orders resp. metric spaces have been used with great benefit in order to provide a meaning to recursive and repetitive constructs. This paper presents two methods to define a metric on a subset of a complete partial order such that is a complete metric spaces and the metric semantics on coincides with the partial order semantics on when the same semantic operators are used. The first method is to add a ‘length’ on a complete partial order which means a function of increasing power. The second is based on the ideas of [11] and uses pseudo rank orderings, i.e. monotone sequences of monotone functions . We show that SFP domains can be characterized as special kinds of rank orderded cpo's. We also discuss the connection between the Lawson topology and the topology induced by the metric. Received 11 July 1995 / 1 August 1996     

Models for name-passing processes: interleaving and causal

We study syntax-free models for name-passing processes. For interleaving semantics, we identify the indexing structure required of an early labelled transition system to support the usual π-calculus operations, defining Indexed Labelled Transition Systems. For non-interleaving causal semantics we define Indexed Labelled Asynchronous Transition Systems, smoothly generalizing both our interleaving model and the standard Asynchronous Transition Systems model for CCS-like calculi. In each case we relate a denotational semantics to an operational view, for bisimulation and causal bisimulation respectively. We establish completeness properties of, and adjunctions between, categories of the two models. Alternative indexing structures and possible applications are also discussed. These are first steps towards a uniform understanding of the semantics and operations of name-passing calculi.     

Timing and causality in process algebra

 There has been considerable controversy in concurrency theory between the ‘interleaving’ and ‘true concurrency’ schools. The former school advocates associating a transition system with a process which captures concurrent execution via the interleaving of occurrences; the latter adopts more complex semantic structures to avoid reducing concurrency to interleaving. In this paper we show that the two approaches are not irreconcilable. We define a timed process algebra where occurrences are associated with intervals of time, and give it a transition system semantics. This semantics has many of the advantages of the interleaving approach; the algebra admits an expansion theorem, and bisimulation semantics can be used as usual. Our transition systems, however, incorporate timing information, and this enables us to express concurrency: merely adding timing appropriately generalises transition systems to asynchronous transition systems, showing that time gives a link between true concurrency and interleaving. Moreover, we can provide a complete axiomatisation of bisimulation for our algebra; a result that is often problematic in a timed setting. Another advantage of incorporating timing information into the calculus is that it allows a particularly simple definition of action refinement; this we present. The paper concludes with a comparison of the equivalence we present with those in the literature, and an example system specification in our formalism. Received December 20, 1993/February 23, 1995     

The semantics of the combination of atomized statements and parallel choice

In this paper we define a uniform language that is an extension of the language underlying the process algebraPA. One of the main extensions of this language overPA is given by so-called atomizing brackets. If we place these brackets around a statement then we treat this statement as an atomic action. Put differently, these brackets remove all interleaving points. We present a transition system for the language and derive its operational semantics. We show that there are several options for defining a transition system such that the resulting operational semantics is a conservative extension of the semantics forPA. We define a semantic domain and a denotational model for the language. Next we define a closure operator on the semantic domain and show how to use this closure operator to derive a fully abstract denotational semantics. Then the algebraic theory of the language is considered. We define a collection of axioms and a term rewrite system based on these axioms. Using this term rewrite system we are able to identify normal forms for the language. It is shown that these axioms capture the denotational equality. It follows that if two terms are provably equal then they have the same operational semantics. Finally, we show how to extend the axiomatization in order to axiomatize its operational equivalence.     

prialt in Handel-C: an operational semantics

We describe an operational semantics for the hardware compilation language Handel-C [7], which is a C-like language with channel communication and parallel constructs which compiles down to mainly synchronously clocked hardware. The work in this paper builds on previous work describing the semantics of the “prialt” construct within Handel-C [5] and a denotational semantics for part of the language [6]. We describe a key subset of the language and show how a design decision for the real language, namely that default guards in a prialt statement executed in “zero-time”, has consequences for the complexity of the operational semantics. We present the operational semantics, along with a revised and completed prialt semantics, indicating clearly the interface between them. We then describe a notion of observational equivalence and present an example illustrating how we handle the complexity of nested prialts in default guards.     

Process algebra with action dependencies

In this paper, we present a process algebra with a minimal form of semantics for actions given by dependencies. Action dependencies are interpreted in the Mazurkiewicz sense: independent actions should be able to commute, or (from a different perspective) should be unordered, whereas dependent actions are always ordered. In this approach, the process algebra operators are used to describe the conceptual behavioural structure of the system, and the action dependencies determine the minimal necessary orderings and thereby the additionally possible parallelism within this structure. In previous work on the semantics of specifications using Mazurkiewicz dependencies, the main interest has been on linear time. We present in this paper a branching time semantics, both operationally and denotationally. For this purpose, we introduce a process algebra that incorporates, besides some standard operators, also an operator for action refinement. For interpreting the operators in the presence of action dependencies, a new concept of partial termination has to be developed. We show consistency of the operational and denotational semantics; furthermore, we give a axiomatisation of bisimilarity, which is complete for finite terms. Some small examples demonstrate the flexibility of this process algebra in the design of distributed reactive systems. Received: 19 November 1998 / 18 July 2001     

Event-based operational semantics and a consistency result for real-time concurrent processes with action refinement

In this paper an event-based operational interleaving semantics is proposed for real-time processes,for which action refinement and a denotational true concurrency semantics are developed and defined in terms of timed event structures. The authors characterize the timed event traces that are generated by the operational semantics in a denotational way, and show that this operational semantics is consistent with the denotational semantics in the sense that they generate the same set of timed event traces, thereby eliminating the gap between the true concurrency and interleaving semantics.     

Programs as partial graphs II: Recursion

In Part I of the paper, we have proposed a unified relational algebra approach using partial graphs for theoretical investigations on semantics, correctness and termination. This approach is extended here to systems of recursive programs, allowing not only sequencing and conditional branching as a control structure but also flow diagrams.An equivalence proof of operational and denotational semantics is obtained which is strictly based on axioms of relational algebra. A short new proof of an important completeness result is given in the generalized setting of systems of recursive flow diagram programs. Finally, Hitchcock-Park's theorem on derivatives is formulated in the general case of nondeterministic recursive flow diagram programs.     

Constructing language processors with algebra combinators

Modular Monadic Semantics (MMS) is a well-known mechanism for structuring modular denotational semantic definitions for programming languages. The principal attraction of MMS is that families of language constructs can be independently specified and later combined in a mix-and-match fashion to create a complete language semantics. This has proved useful for constructing formal, yet executable, semantics when prototyping languages. In this work we demonstrate that MMS has an additional software engineering benefit. In addition to composing semantics for various language constructs, we can use MMS to compose various differing semantics for the same language constructs. This capability allows us to compose and reuse orthogonal language tasks such as type checking and compilation. We describe algebra combinators, the principal vehicle for achieving this reuse, along with a series of applications of the technique for common language processing tasks.     

A formal framework for software product lines

ContextA Software Product Line is a set of software systems that are built from a common set of features. These systems are developed in a prescribed way and they can be adapted to fit the needs of customers. Feature models specify the properties of the systems that are meaningful to customers. A semantics that models the feature level has the potential to support the automatic analysis of entire software product lines.ObjectiveThe objective of this paper is to define a formal framework for Software Product Lines. This framework needs to be general enough to provide a formal semantics for existing frameworks like FODA (Feature Oriented Domain Analysis), but also to be easily adaptable to new problems.MethodWe define an algebraic language, called SPLA, to describe Software Product Lines. We provide the semantics for the algebra in three different ways. The approach followed to give the semantics is inspired by the semantics of process algebras. First we define an operational semantics, next a denotational semantics, and finally an axiomatic semantics. We also have defined a representation of the algebra into propositional logic.ResultsWe prove that the three semantics are equivalent. We also show how FODA diagrams can be automatically translated into SPLA. Furthermore, we have developed our tool, called AT, that implements the formal framework presented in this paper. This tool uses a SAT-solver to check the satisfiability of an SPL.ConclusionThis paper defines a general formal framework for software product lines. We have defined three different semantics that are equivalent; this means that depending on the context we can choose the most convenient approach: operational, denotational or axiomatic. The framework is flexible enough because it is closely related to process algebras. Process algebras are a well-known paradigm for which many extensions have been defined.     

Four domains for concurrency

We give four domains for concurrency in a uniform way by means of domain equations. The domains are intended for modelling the four possible combinations of linear time versus branching time, and of interleaving versus noninterleaving concurrency. We use the linear time, noninterleaved domain to give operational and denotational semantics for a simple concurrent language with recursion, and prove that .     

Algebraic theory of probabilistic processes

In this paper we extend de Nicola and Hennessy’s testing theory to deal with probabilities. We say that two processes are testing equivalent if the probabilities with which they pass any test are equal. We present three alternative semantic views of our testing equivalence. First, we introduce adequate extensions of acceptance sets (inducing an operational characterization) and acceptance trees (inducing a denotational semantics). We also present a sound and complete axiomatization of our testing equivalence. So, this paper represents a complete study of the adaptation of the classical testing theory for probabilistic processes.     

Step failures semantics and a complete proof system

Summary The (linear) failures semantics is a well-known model for the theoretical version of Hoare's CSP. We generalize this semantics by taking steps (i.e. multisets of simultaneously occurring actions) instead of single actions as the basic execution unit. Hence opposed to the linear semantics — where parallelism is modelled as arbitrary interleaving in order to avoid technical complication — the step failures semantics models parallelism explicitly and is equally easy to manage. In particular a sound and complete proof system is given. Opposed to the linear model divergence is treated uniformly here. The relation to the linear semantics can be established using our newly introduced deparallelize operator.The first author is supported by an Ernst von Siemens scholarship. A preliminary version of this paper appeared in [37]     

A process oriented semantics of the PRAM-language FORK

The parallel language FORK [1], based on a scalable shared memory model, is a PASCAL-like language with some additional parallel constructs. A PRAM (Parallel Random Access Machine) algorithm can be expressed on a high level of abstraction as a FORK program which is translated into efficient PRAM code guaranteeing theoretically predicted runtimes.

In this paper, we concentrate on those features of the language FORK related to parallelism, such as the group concept, a shared memory access and synchronous or asynchronous execution. We present a trace-based denotational interleaving semantics where processes describe synchronous computations. Processes are created or deleted dynamically and run asynchronously. Interleaving rules reflect the underlying CRCW (concurrent-read-concurrent-write) PRAM model.     

From algebraic semantics to denotational semantics for Verilog

This paper considers how the algebraic semantics for Verilog relates with its denotational semantics. Our approach is to derive the denotational semantics from the algebraic semantics. We first present the algebraic laws for Verilog. Every program can be expressed as a guarded choice that can model the execution of a program. In order to investigate the parallel expansion laws, a sequence is introduced, indicating which instantaneous action is due to which exact parallel component. A head normal form is defined for each program by using a locality sequence. We provide a strategy for deriving the denotational semantics based on head normal form. Using this strategy, the denotational semantics for every program can be calculated. Program equivalence can also be explored by using the derived denotational semantics. A short version of this paper appeared in Proc. ICECCS 2006: 11th IEEE International Conference on Engineering of Complex Computer Systems [48]. This work is partially supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (No. 2005CB321904), the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (No. 2007AA010302) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 90718004). Jonathan Bowen is a visiting professor at King’s College London and an emeritus professor at London South Bank University.     

Nondeterministic flowchart programs with recursive procedures: semantics and correctness I

In this paper, we study some aspects of the semantics of nondeterministic flowchart programs with recursive procedures. In the first part of this work we provide the operational semantics of programs using the concept of an execution tree. We propose a new definition of the semantics of a non-deterministic recursive program as a mapping from the input domain to the set of execution trees determined by the program. Using this new concept, we prove that every nondeterministic flowchart program with recursive procedures can be unfolded into a semantically equivalent infinite pure flowchart (without procedures). This result is applied in the second part of this work to prove the soundness of an inductive assertion method which is also complete with a finite number of assertions (contrary to De Bakker and Meertens's method [11]).     

Bundle event structures: A revised cpo approach

Bundle event structures equipped with a partial order ? have been used to give a true concurrency denotational semantics for LOTOS. This model has also been extended by time and stochastic information. Unfortunately it fails to yield a complete partial order (cpo) as we illustrate by an example.We propose a subset of all bundle event structures such that it forms a cpo. This subset is closed under the usual operators on bundle event structures. And as a consequence these operators are continuous. Therefore, this subset can be used to give a denotational semantics of LOTOS.     

Focus points and convergent process operators: a proof strategy for protocol verification

We present a method for efficiently providing algebraic correctness proofs for communication systems. It is described in the setting of μCRL [J.F. Groote, A. Ponse, The syntax and semantics of μCRL, in: A. Ponse, C. Verhoef, S.F.M. van Vlijmen (Eds.), Algebra of Communicating Processes, Workshops in Computing, Springer, Berlin, 1994, pp. 26–62] which is, roughly, ACP [J.C.M. Baeten, W.P. Weijland, Process Algebra, Cambridge Tracts in Theoretical Computer Science, vol. 18, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1990, J.A. Bergstra, J.W. Klop, The algebra of recursively defined processes and the algebra of regular processes, in: Proceedings of the 11th ICALP, Antwerp, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 172, Springer, Berlin, 1984, pp. 82–95] extended with a formal treatment of the interaction between data and processes. The method incorporates assertional methods, such as invariants and simulations, in an algebraic framework, and centers around the idea that the state spaces of distributed systems are structured as a number of cones with focus points. As a result, it reduces a large part of algebraic protocol verification to the checking of a number of elementary facts concerning data parameters occurring in implementation and specification. The resulting method has been applied to various non-trivial case studies of which a number have been verified mechanically with the theorem checker PVS. In this paper the strategy is illustrated by several small examples and one larger example, the Concurrent Alternating Bit Protocol (CABP).