Intimal hyperplasia thickness at follow-up is independent of stent size: a serial intravascular ultrasound study

The purpose of this study was to determine whether the thickness of the intimal hyperplasia (IH) layer that accumulates within Palmaz-Schatz stents is dependent on stent size. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and quantitative angiographic (QCA) studies were performed after stent implantation and at follow-up (5.4 +/- 3.8 months) in 161 patients with 177 lesions treated with 221 Palmaz-Schatz stents. Stent and lumen cross-sectional area (CSA) were measured. IH CSA and thickness at follow-up were calculated and compared with stent CSA and circumference. Maximum IH CSA and thickness were measured at the smallest follow-up lumen CSA; mean IH CSA and thickness was averaged over the length of the stent. Maximum IH CSA measured 4.8 +/- 2.4 mm2, and mean IH CSA measured 2.8 +/- 2.2 mm2. Maximum IH thickness (at the smallest follow-up lumen CSA) measured 0.60 +/- 0.36 mm, and mean IH thickness (over the length of the stent) measured 0.30 +/- 0.19 mm. There was a weak, but significant correlation between mean and maximum IH CSA versus stent CSA (r = 0.215, p <0.0001 and r = 0.355, p <0.0001, respectively). However, there was no correlation between mean or maximum IH thickness versus stent CSA (r = 0.018, p = 0.643 and r = 0.056, p = 0.463, respectively) or stent circumference (r = 0.002, p = 0.956 and r = 0.069, p = 0.361, respectively). IH thickness was found to be independent of the stent size. This explains the known higher frequency of restenosis in smaller stents compared with larger stents.     

Randomised comparison of implantation of heparin-coated stents with balloon angioplasty in selected patients with coronary artery disease (Benestent II)

BACKGROUND: The multicentre, randomised Benestent-II study investigated a strategy of implantation of a heparin-coated Palmar-Schatz stent plus antiplatelet drugs compared with the use of balloon angioplasty in selected patients with stable or stabilised unstable angina, with one or more de-novo lesions, less than 18 mm long, in vessels of diameter 3 mm or more. METHODS: 827 patients were randomly assigned stent implantation (414 patients) or standard balloon angioplasty (413 patients). The primary clinical endpoint was event-free survival at 6 months, including death, myocardial infarction, and the need for revascularisation. The secondary endpoints were the restenosis rate at 6 months and the cost-effectiveness at 12 months. There was also one-to-one subrandomisation to either clinical and angiographic follow-up or clinical follow-up alone. Analyses were by intention to treat. FINDINGS: Four patients (one stent group, three angioplasty group) were excluded from analysis since no lesion was found. At 6 months, a primary clinical endpoint had occurred in 53 (12.8%) of 413 patients in the stent group and 79 (19.3%) of 410 in the angioplasty group (p=0.013). This significant difference in clinical outcome was maintained at 12 months. In the subgroup assigned angiographic follow-up, the mean minimum lumen diameter was greater in the stent group than in the balloon-angioplasty group, (1.89 [SD 0.65] vs 1.66 [0.57] mm, p=0.0002), which corresponds to restenosis rates (diameter stenosis > or =50%) of 16% and 31% (p=0.0008). In the group assigned clinical follow-up alone, event-free survival rate at 12 months was higher in the stent group than the balloon-angioplasty group (0.89 vs 0.79, p=0.004) at a cost of an additional 2085 Dutch guilders (US$1020) per patient. INTERPRETATION: Over 12-month follow-up, a strategy of elective stenting with heparin-coated stents is more effective but also more costly than balloon angioplasty.     

The relation between multiple sleep latency test findings and the frequency of apneic events in REM and non-REM sleep

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the immediate results and the 6-month angiographic recurrent restenosis rate after balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis. BACKGROUND: Despite excellent immediate and mid-term results, 20% to 30% of patients with coronary stent implantation will present an angiographic restenosis and may require additional treatment. The optimal treatment for in-stent restenosis is still unclear. METHODS: Quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) analyses were performed before and after stent implantation, before and after balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis and on a 6-month systematic coronary angiogram to assess the recurrent angiographic restenosis rate. RESULTS: Balloon angioplasty was performed in 52 patients presenting in-stent restenosis. In-stent restenosis was either diffuse (> or =10 mm) inside the stent (71%) or focal (29%). Mean stent length was 16+/-7 mm. Balloon diameter of 2.98+/-0.37 mm and maximal inflation pressure of 10+/-3 atm were used for balloon angioplasty. Angiographic success rate was 100% without any complication. Acute gain was lower after balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis than after stent implantation: 1.19+/-0.60 mm vs. 1.75+/-0.68 mm (p=0.0002). At 6-month follow-up, 60% of patients were asymptomatic and no patient died. Eighteen patients (35%) had repeat target vessel revascularization. Angiographic restenosis rate was 54%. Recurrent restenosis rate was higher when in-stent restenosis was diffuse: 63% vs. 31% when focal, p=0.046. CONCLUSIONS: Although balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis can be safely and successfully performed, it leads to less immediate stenosis improvement than at time of stent implantation and carries a high recurrent angiographic restenosis rate at 6 months, in particular in diffuse in-stent restenosis lesions.     

Bovine endometrial retinol-binding protein secretion, messenger ribonucleic acid expression, and cellular localization during the estrous cycle and early pregnancy

OBJECTIVES: We assessed the safety and efficacy of stent placement in patients with poorly controlled hypertension and renal artery stenoses, which are difficult to treat with balloon angioplasty alone. BACKGROUND: Preliminary experience with stent placement suggests improved results over balloon angioplasty alone in patients with atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis. METHODS: Balloon-expandable stents were placed in 100 consecutive patients (133 renal arteries) with hypertension and renal artery stenosis. Sixty-seven of the patients had unilateral renal artery stenosis treated and 33 had bilateral renal artery stenoses treated with stents placed in both renal arteries. RESULTS: Angiographic success, as determined by quantitative angiography, was obtained in 132 (99%) of 133 lesions. Early clinical success was achieved in 76% of the patients. Six months after stent placement, the systolic blood pressure was reduced from 173 +/- 25 to 147 +/- 23 mm Hg (p < 0.001); the diastolic pressure from 88 +/- 17 to 76 +/- 12 mm Hg (p < 0.001); and the mean number of antihypertensive medications per patient from 2.6 +/- 1 to 2.0 +/- 0.9 (p < 0.001). Angiographic follow-up at a mean of 8.7 +/- 5.0 months in 67 patients revealed restenosis (>50% diameter narrowing) in 15 (19%) of 80 stented vessels. CONCLUSIONS: Renal artery stenting is an effective treatment for renovascular hypertension, with a low angiographic restenosis rate. Stent placement appears to be a very attractive therapy in patients with lesions difficult to treat with balloon angioplasty such as renal aorto-ostial lesions and restenotic lesions, as well as after a suboptimal balloon angioplasty result.     

Intravascular ultrasound-guided optimized stent deployment. Immediate and 6 months clinical and angiographic results from the Multicenter Ultrasound Stenting in Coronaries Study (MUSIC Study)

OBJECTIVES: A study was set up to validate the safety and feasibility of intravascular ultrasound-guided stenting without subsequent anticoagulation, and its impact on the 6 months restenosis rate. METHODS: The study was designed to be multicentred, prospective, and observational. RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-one patients with stable angina and a de novo coronary artery lesion were enrolled. In four patients, the implantation of a Palmaz-Schatz (with spiral bridge) stent had failed. One of these four patients died 3 days following bypass surgery. In two other patients, intravascular ultrasound assessment was not performed. One hundred and twenty-five of the remaining 155 patients (81%) were treated with aspirin (100 mg x day(-1)), because all three criteria for optimized stent expansion were met. Twenty-two of the remaining 38 patients (25%), in whom at least one criterion was not met were treated with aspirin and acenocoumarol (3 months, INR 2.5-3.5), while 16 patients only received aspirin. Stent thrombosis was documented in two patients (1.3%) for which repeat angioplasty was performed. During the hospital stay, there were no deaths or Q-wave myocardial infarctions. Five patients (3.2%) sustained a non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. During the follow-up period (198+/-38 days, complete for all patients, except one), one patient (0.6%) sustained a Q-wave myocardial infarction, one (0.6%) underwent bypass surgery, and repeat angioplasty was performed in nine patients (5.7%). In two of the nine patients, repeat angioplasty involved another lesion. Therefore, the target lesion revascularization rate during follow-up was 4.5% (seven patients). At quantitative coronary angiography, the minimal lumen diameter (mean+/-SD) increased from 1.12+/-0.34 mm before to 2.89+/-0.35 mm after stenting. Repeat angiography at 6 months was performed in 144 patients (92%). The minimal lumen diameter at follow-up was 2.12+/-0.67 mm. Restenosis (diameter stenosis of 50% or more) was documented in 12 patients or 8.3%. When the two patients with documented stent thrombosis are included, the restenosis rate amounts to 97%. CONCLUSIONS: These data confirm that, in selected patients, stents can safely be implanted without the use of systemic anticoagulation, provided optimal stent expansion is achieved. The exact role of intravascular ultrasound in the achievement of these results needs to be established by appropriately designed studies. In the meantime, intravascular ultrasound coupled with the Palmaz-Schatz stent incorporating a spiral bridge, may have contributed considerably to the immediate angiographic outcome, which in turn may explain the favourable clinical and angiographic outcome at 6 months.     

Six-month clinical and angiographic outcome of the new, less shortening Wallstent in native coronary arteries

BACKGROUND: The new, less shortening, self-expanding Wallstent is characterized by longitudinal flexibility, a protective membrane, a low profile, and a customized range of diameters (3.5 to 6.0 mm). The recent modification of the braiding angle of the Wallstent has resulted in a new device with less shortening on expansion and a concomitant reduction in radial force. We hypothesized that the enforced mechanical remodeling produced by the selection of an oversized Wallstent might result in improved accommodation of subsequent reactive intimal hyperplasia and prevention of chronic recoil of the vessel. METHODS AND RESULTS: To prove this hypothesis, we recently implanted 44 new, less shortening Wallstents in 35 native coronary arteries in 35 patients with acute or threatened closure after balloon angioplasty, according to a strategy of oversizing of Wallstent diameter and complete coverage of the lesion length. The initial and 6-month follow-up angiograms were analyzed with a computer-based quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) system. Acute gain (minimal luminal diameter [MLD] post minus MLD pre) and late loss (MLD post minus MLD at follow-up) were examined. Stent deployment was successful in 44 of 44 attempts (100%). Nominal stent diameter used was 1.40 mm larger than the maximal vessel diameter. One patient (3%) with a dilated but unstented lesion proximal to the stented segment sustained a subacute occlusion on day 1 associated with myocardial infarction. Event-free survival at 30 days after stent implantation was 97% (34 of 35 patients). Of the 34 patients eligible for 6-month angiographic follow-up, 3 who were asymptomatic declined repeat angiography. MLD (and percent diameter stenosis [% DS]) changed from 0.83 +/- 0.50 mm (72%) pre through 3.06 +/- 0.48 mm (15%) post to 2.27 +/- 0.74 mm (28%) at follow-up. Acute gain was 2.23 +/- 0.63 mm, and late loss was 0.78 +/- 0.61 mm. Angiographic restenosis ( > 50% DS) was observed in 5 of 31 patients (16%) at 6 months, all of whom underwent repeat angioplasty. Thus, the overall event-free survival at 6-month follow-up was 83% (29 of 35 patients). CONCLUSIONS: The oversized Wallstent implantation with complete coverage of the lesion length conveyed a favorable 6-month clinical and angiographic outcome. The large acute gain obtained by the Wallstent afforded greater accommodation of the subsequent late loss. The enforced mechanical remodeling by oversized new Wallstents may result in prevention of acute and chronic recoil of the vessel wall and subsequently a lower restenosis rate at follow-up.     

Balloon-expandable stent repair of severe coarctation of aorta

Experimental studies have shown that stents implanted at the aorta become incorporated within the aortic wall and can be further expanded in growing animals. This study evaluates the feasibility and immediate results of balloon-expandable stent implantation in 10 patients with severe coarctation of aorta. The ages of the patients ranged from 1 month to 43 years; 1 was an infant, 8 were children (mean age 5.3 +/- 4 years), and 1 was an adult. All had an unfavorable anatomy for balloon angioplasty; 9 had isthmus hypoplasia. Balloon predilation was first performed and its immediate effect evaluated. Then a balloon-expandable stent that was 30 mm long and covered the isthmus and coarctation levels was deployed, and it was further expanded to the preselected final diameter (12 +/- 4 mm). A final hemodynamic and angiographic evaluation was then obtained. Full deployment of an incompletely expanded and distally displaced stent in the infant led to aortic disruption that was controlled by a second stent covering the disrupted zone and the isthmus. After balloon angioplasty alone was done, the mean gradient (43 +/- 12 vs 31 +/- 10 mm Hg) and the percentage stenosis (72% +/- 11% vs 54% +/- 11%) had an insufficient decrease. However, after stent implantation was done, the gradient almost disappeared (mean 2 +/- 3 mm Hg). The angiographic stenosis disappeared in 7 patients and was markedly reduced in 3. The ratio of isthmus/descending aorta changed from 0.65 +/- 0.14 to 1 +/- 0.08 (p < 0.01).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Recurrence and death in non-small cell lung carcinomas: a prognostic model using pathological parameters, microvessel count, and gene protein products

Optimized stent expansion by high-pressure inflations of oversized balloons has initially been derived from experience obtained with the Palmaz-Schatz stent, whereas there is little experience with this strategy in the Wallstent. By using this approach with quantitative coronary angiographic guidance, 20 Wallstents and 20 Palmaz-Schatz stents were implanted in 34 patients and consecutively examined by conventional two-dimensional (2D) intracoronary ultrasound (ICUS) and three-dimensional (3D) ICUS on the basis of the application of a pattern recognition algorithm. Ultrasound criteria of adequate stent expansion were defined as a complete apposition of the stent to the vessel wall, a stent symmetry index (SSI = minimum/maximum lumen diameter) > or = O.7, and a stent-reference lumen area ratio (SRR = Minimum intrastent lumen area/Average of proximal and distal reference lumen area) > or = O.8. In all cases a smooth angiographic lumen and a negative diameter stenosis, on the basis of a distal reference, was achieved. For the Wallstents ICUS showed a higher SSI (2D, 0.95 +/- 0.04 vs 0.85 +/- 0.09; p < 0.001; 3D, 0.90 +/- 0.09 vs 0.82 +/- 0.11, p < 0.05) and a lower SRR (2D, 0.66 +/- 0.12 vs 0.81 +/- 0.13, p < 0.005; 3D, 0.63 +/- 0.14 vs 0.74 +/- 0.15, p < 0.05) than for the Palmaz-Schatz stents. Ninety percent of failure in meeting these criteria resulted from a low SRR. The incidence of incomplete stent apposition (one in both stents) or SSI <0.7 was low and generally associated with an SRR <0.8. The Wallstents met the ICUS criteria less often (2D, 2(1O%) vs 10(50%), p < 0.01; 3D, 3(15%) vs 9(45%), p < 0.05), were significantly longer (35.1 +/- 7.7 mm and 14.3 +/- 3.3 mm, p < 0.0001), and generally demonstrated a larger vessel tapering, measured as proximal minus distal ICUS reference lumen area (1.33 +/- 2.91 mm2 vs 0.44 +/- 1.97 mm(2), not significant). Wallstents meeting the ICUS criteria, however, showed less vessel tapering (0.18 +/- 1.64 mm(2)). Thus optimized stent expansion was followed by excellent angiographic results for both Palmaz-Schatz and Wallstent. Although angiographic results and visual assessment of the ICUS examination suggested a good outcome, few Wallstents met the ICUS criteria in contrast to the Palmaz-Schatz stents. The low value of the SRR in the Wallstents is likely to be caused by vessel tapering, suggesting that this criterion may be unsuitable in assessing the adequacy of the expansion of relatively long stents such as the Wallstent.     

Stent placement compared with balloon angioplasty for obstructed coronary bypass grafts. Saphenous Vein De Novo Trial Investigators

BACKGROUND: Treatment of stenosis in saphenous-vein grafts after coronary-artery bypass surgery is a difficult challenge. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of stent placement with those of balloon angioplasty on clinical and angiographic outcomes in patients with obstructive disease of saphenous-vein grafts. METHODS: A total of 220 patients with new lesions in aortocoronary-venous bypass grafts were randomly assigned to placement of Palmaz-Schatz stents or standard balloon angioplasty. Coronary angiography was performed during the index procedure and six months later. RESULTS: As compared with the patients assigned to angioplasty, those assigned to stenting had a higher rate of procedural efficacy, defined as a reduction in stenosis to less than 50 percent of the vessel diameter without a major cardiac complication (92 percent vs. 69 percent, P<0.001), but they had more frequent hemorrhagic complications (17 percent vs. 5 percent, P<0.01). Patients in the stent group had a larger mean (+/-SD) increase in luminal diameter immediately after the procedure (1.92+/-0.30 mm, as compared with 1.21+/-0.37 mm in the angioplasty group; P<0.001) and a greater mean net gain in luminal diameter at six months (0.85+/-0.96 vs. 0.54+/-0.91 mm, P=0.002). Restenosis occurred in 37 percent of the patients in the stent group and in 46 percent of the patients in the angioplasty group (P=0.24). The outcome in terms of freedom from death, myocardial infarction, repeated bypass surgery, or revascularization of the target lesion was significantly better in the stent group (73 percent vs. 58 percent, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: As compared with balloon angioplasty, stenting of selected venous bypass-graft lesions resulted in superior procedural outcomes, a larger gain in luminal diameter, and a reduction in major cardiac events. However, there was no significant benefit in the rate of angiographic restenosis, which was the primary end point of the study.     

Treatment of ostial lesions of the left anterior descending coronary artery with Palmaz-Schatz coronary stent

We evaluated acute and long-term clinical and angiographic results of elective Palmaz-Schatz coronary stent implantation for left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) ostial stenosis in 23 consecutive patients. Eight patients had stable angina, 14 had unstable angina, and 1 had recent myocardial infarction. Sixteen patients had single-vessel, 5 had double-vessel, and 2 had triple-vessel disease. Clinical success without major complications (death, acute myocardial infarction, emergency coronary artery bypass grafting) was obtained in all cases and technical success in 20 cases (86.9%). After stenting, minimal lumen diameter increased from 1.05 +/- 0.45 mm to 2.89 +/- 0.52 mm (p < 0.001), and percent diameter stenosis decreased from 65.49% +/- 13.36% to 2.94% +/- 19.93% (p < 0.001). One case of subacute thrombosis and no major bleeding occurred. Twenty patients were followed-up for 6 months, during which no acute cardiac event (death, acute myocardial infarction) was observed. Eighteen patients were eligible for follow-up coronary angiography; restenosis (> or = 50% diameter stenosis) was observed in 4 (22.2%). Minimal lumen diameter was 1.77 +/- 0.55 mm, percent diameter stenosis was 39.66% +/- 17.62%, late loss was 1.01 +/- 0.69 mm, net gain was 0.79 +/- 0.55 mm, and loss index (late loss/acute gain) was 0.53 +/- 0.37. This study suggests that elective Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation may be a safe and successful treatment of LAD ostial lesions and provides a large increase in lumen diameter.     

Restenosis rate after intravascular ultrasound-guided coronary stent implantation

This study was designed to test the hypothesis that patients fulfilling intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) criteria for optimal coronary stent implantation show a reduction in the restenosis rate at 6 months. IVUS guidance for stent dilation may be associated with facilitated stent implantation and an increased acute luminal gain, but it has not yet been determined, whether and to what extent this procedure is associated with a reduction in the restenosis rate. IVUS-guided optimization of Palmaz-Schatz stent placement was performed in 125 consecutive patients, 64 of whom fulfilled IVUS-criteria for optimal stent placement. Another 125 patients served as the non-IVUS control group. In 107 patients (86%) of the non-IVUS control group and 105 patients (84%) of the IVUS group, angiographic follow-up was performed. The IVUS group of patients revealed a significantly lower restenosis rate of 20.9% as compared with 29.9% in the control group (P = 0.033). Patients that met IVUS criteria for optimal stent placement had a larger minimal lumen diameter immediately after stent implantation (3.13 +/- 0.44 vs. 2.95 +/- 0.47 mm; P = 0.045) and at 6-month follow-up (2.23 +/- 0.78 vs. 1.87 +/- 0.76 mm; P = 0.019) as well as a significantly lower restenosis rate (13.5% vs. 28.3%; P = 0.038) as compared with patients that did not fulfil these criteria. Our data suggest that patients fulfilling IVUS criteria for optimal stent placement demonstrate a reduced risk for the development of restenosis. Thus, IVUS investigation identifies factors predictive of restenosis after coronary stent placement.     

Cytochrome P450 2E1 mRNA in the rat prostate: detection and quantitation by competitive reverse transcription and polymerase chain reaction

Conventional balloon angioplasty treatment of aorto-ostial stenoses in native coronary arteries and saphenous vein grafts is associated with a low primary success rate, a high complication rate and a high incidence of restenosis. The short-term outcome of Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation in aorto-ostial lesions was compared with that of balloon angioplasty. Thirteen patients underwent stent implantation for 13 de novo lesions (four in the left main coronary trunk, two in the right coronary artery, seven in the vein graft) between January 1994 and December 1995. Fourteen patients underwent balloon angioplasty for 14 de novo lesions (five in the left main coronary trunk, four in the right coronary artery, five in the vein graft between January 1986 and April 1992. Both groups had similar clinical characteristics. Initial success was obtained in all patients in the stent group, compared with 71% of the balloon angioplasty group. Insufficient dilation was the main cause for such failure in the balloon angioplasty group. Baseline reference diameters were similar (3.40 +/- 0.65 mm in the stent group vs 3.36 +/- 0.42 mm in the balloon angioplasty group) and there was no difference in baseline minimal luminal diameter (1.41 +/- 0.74 vs 1.08 +/- 0.56 mm). Minimal luminal diameter was significantly greater in the stent group than in the balloon angioplasty group at both post-procedure and follow-up examinations (post: 3.36 +/- 0.58 vs 2.69 +/- 0.45 mm, p < 0.01; follow-up: 2.33 +/- 0.96 vs 1.52 +/- 0.68 mm, p < 0.05). There was no subacute occlusion in either group. The overall angiographic restenosis rate (> 50% stenosis) was lower in the stent group (17%) than in the balloon angioplasty group: the restenosis rates of native lesions were 0% in the stent group and 40% in the balloon angioplasty group; those of saphenous vein graft lesions were 33% in the stent group and 50% in the balloon angioplasty group. Although the number of patients was limited, these results suggest that Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation may be a safe and effective strategy for treating aorto-ostial lesions in both native coronary arteries and saphenous vein grafts.     

Optimal coronary balloon angioplasty with provisional stenting versus primary stent (OCBAS): immediate and long-term follow-up results

OBJECTIVE: This study sought to compare two strategies of revascularization in patients obtaining a good immediate angiographic result after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA): elective stenting versus optimal PTCA. A good immediate angiographic result with provisional stenting was considered to occur only if early loss in minimal luminal diameter (MLD) was documented at 30 min post-PTCA angiography. BACKGROUND: Coronary stenting reduces restenosis in lesions exhibiting early deterioration (>0.3 mm) in MLD within the first 24 hours (early loss) after successful PTCA. Lesions with no early loss after PTCA have a low restenosis rate. METHODS: To compare angiographic restenosis and target vessel revascularization (TVR) of lesions treated with coronary stenting versus those treated with optimal PTCA, 116 patients were randomized to stent (n=57) or to optimal PTCA (n=59). After randomization in the PTCA group, 13.5% of the patients crossed over to stent due to early loss (provisional stenting). RESULTS: Baseline demographic and angiographic characteristics were similar in both groups of patients. At 7.6 months, 96.6% of the entire population had a follow-up angiographic study: 98.2% in the stent and 94.9% in the PTCA group. Immediate and follow-up angiographic data showed that acute gain was significantly higher in the stent than in the PTCA group (1.95 vs. 1.5 mm; p < 0.03). However, late loss was significantly higher in the stent than the PTCA group (0.63+/-0.59 vs. 0.26+/-0.44, respectively; p=0.01). Hence, net gain with both techniques was similar (1.32< or =0.3 vs. 1.24+/-0.29 mm for the stent and the PTCA groups, respectively; p=NS). Angiographic restenosis rate at follow-up (19.2% in stent vs. 16.4% in PTCA; p=NS) and TVR (17.5% in stent vs. 13.5% in PTCA; p=NS) were similar. Furthermore, event-free survival was 80.8% in the stent versus 83.1% in the PTCA group (p=NS). Overall costs (hospital and follow-up) were US $591,740 in the stent versus US $398,480 in the PTCA group (p < 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The strategy of PTCA with delay angiogram and provisional stent if early loss occurs had similar restenosis rate and TVR, but lower cost than primary stenting after PTCA.     

The use of human hepatocytes to select compounds based on their expected hepatic extraction ratios in humans

Stent deployment strategies have changed significantly in the past 2 yr, with "high-pressure" balloon inflations postdilatation being performed in the large majority of cases. There is currently little information about the effects of high pressure on the geometry of stent expansion and on the adjacent areas of the vessel wall. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging is well-suited to investigate these issues, since it provides information not only about stent expansion and apposition but also about adjacent vessel-wall morphology at transition points such as the articulation site of the stent and the the stent borders. We report on the results of a cohort of 30 consecutive stent cases which were systematically examined by IVUS following high-pressure inflation. All deployments were deemed successful by angiographic inspection. However, in 6 cases, intimal disruptions or "edge tears" were noted at the stent borders by IVUS. In 5 cases, edge tears were seen to occur at the distal border, whereas in one case edge tears were seen at both the proximal and distal edges of the stent. No angiographic and sonographic parameters were different except percent plaque area at the stent margins, which was significantly higher (53 +/- 11%) in the lesions with edge tears, compared to 40 +/- 10% plaque area in the group without evidence of pocket flaps (P = 0.007). This experience suggests that intimal disruptions or "edge tears" are a relatively common occurrence following high-pressure stent deployment, and may be related to the extent of marginal dissections.     

Another look at the AIDS virus]

Stenting of the internal carotid artery is facilitated by stenting across the carotid bifurcation and sizing the diameter of a self-expanding stent to the large common carotid segment. This usually results in marked oversizing of the self-expanding stent in the internal carotid segment. This study was done to determine the relationship between stent oversizing and late luminal loss index after stenting of the internal carotid artery. Between September 1995 and March 1997, there were 165 patients (189 vessels) who underwent successful carotid stenting with self-expanding stents. Fifty-nine patients (63 vessels) had six-month follow-up carotid angiograms and on-line quantitative angiographic analysis. The mean reference diameter of the internal carotid arteries was 4.93+/-1.31 mm. Nominal stent size was 5 mm in 4 patients, 6 mm in 6 patients, 8 mm in 106 patients, 10 mm in 77 patients, and 12 mm in 1 patient. The average stent/patient was 1.03+/-0.16. There were three patients who had more than 50% diameter renarrowing at follow-up. The mean late loss index was 0.25+/-0.41. By linear regression analysis, there was no clear linear relationship between stent oversizing and late loss index after stenting (correlation coefficient = -0.21, P = 0.09). When analysis of variance with linear contrast was used to analyze six groups of different stent/artery ratios (from 1.4 to > or = 2), late loss indexes are significantly lower in the groups of high stent/artery ratio than the groups of low stent/artery ratio (P = 0.01). The process of oversizing of self-expanding stents deployed in the internal carotid artery does not appear to be associated with late restenosis and high stent/artery ratio seems to be associated with low late loss index.     

Coronary-artery stenting compared with balloon angioplasty for restenosis after initial balloon angioplasty. Restenosis Stent Study Group

BACKGROUND: Intracoronary stenting reduces the rate of restenosis after angioplasty in patients with new coronary lesions. We conducted a prospective, randomized, multicenter study to determine whether intracoronary stenting, as compared with standard balloon angioplasty, reduces the recurrence of luminal narrowing in restenotic lesions. METHODS: A total of 383 patients who had undergone at least one balloon angioplasty and who had clinical and angiographic evidence of restenosis after the procedure were randomly assigned to undergo standard balloon angioplasty (192 patients) or intracoronary stenting with a Palmaz-Schatz stent (191 patients). The primary end point was angiographic evidence of restenosis (defined as stenosis of more than 50 percent of the luminal diameter) at six months. The secondary end points were death, Q-wave myocardial infarction, bypass surgery, and revascularization of the target vessel. RESULTS: The rate of restenosis was significantly higher in the angioplasty group than in the stent group (32 percent as compared with 18 percent, P= 0.03). Revascularization of the target vessel at six months was required in 27 percent of the angioplasty group but in only 10 percent of the stent group (P=0.001). This difference resulted from a smaller mean (+/-SD) minimal luminal diameter in the angioplasty group (1.85+/-0.56 mm) than in the stent group (2.04+/-0.66 mm), with a mean difference of 0.19 mm (P=0.01) at follow-up. Subacute thrombosis occurred in 0.6 percent of the angioplasty group and in 3.9 percent of the stent group. The rate of event-free survival at 250 days was 72 percent in the angioplasty group and 84 percent in the stent group (P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Elective coronary stenting was effective in the treatment of restenosis after balloon angioplasty. Stenting resulted in a lower rate of recurrent stenosis despite a higher incidence of subacute thrombosis.     

Primary stenting of de novo lesions in small coronary arteries: a prospective, pilot study

Technical advancement and new anti-thrombotic regimens have recently shown so much improvement in the results of coronary stenting that the conventional contra-indication for stenting in small coronary arteries (<3 mm) needs to be revised. We undertook a prospective pilot study of elective Palmaz-Schatz stenting in de novo lesions located in coronary arteries of less than 3 mm diameter. Fifty consecutive patients (63 +/- 9 years) with stable (n = 38) and unstable angina (n = 12) were included. Philips-DCI quantitative coronary analysis was used to measure reference diameter, minimal lumen diameter and percent diameter stenosis before PTCA, after stenting and at 6-month angiographic follow-up study. All measurements were performed after intracoronary injection of nitroglycerin (300 microg). All patients received ticlopidine (250 mg/day) and aspirin (100 mg/day). The mean lesion length was 9 +/- 3 mm. The balloon size used for stent delivery was 2.75 mm in 30 patients and 2.5 mm in 20 patients and the mean balloon inflation pressure used for stent deployment was 12 +/- 2 atm. All stents were deployed successfully. In-hospital complications occurred in two patients, diagonal branch occlusion at day 2 requiring emergency PTCA in one and a hematoma at the femoral puncture site requiring surgery in the other. Major adverse cardiac event (MACE) rate remained 2% (nonfatal infarct in one). Follow-up angiography (n = 46, 92%) at 6 +/- 3 months showed a 30% restenosis rate. Target vessel revascularization (TVR) rate was 13%. We conclude that elective stenting in small coronary arteries is feasible and involves an acceptable risk of restenosis.     

Intestinal epithelial cell regulation of macrophage and lymphocyte interleukin 10 expression

Patients with recurrent angina after coronary artery bypass graft surgery pose a problem. Stent implantation has been advocated in an effort to avoid repeat operation and to address the limitations of balloon angioplasty. Aim of the present study was to determine the in-hospital and long-term results of stent deployment in focal, de novo lesions of vein grafts. Thirty-five focal, de novo lesions of vein grafts in 31 patients were treated with stent deployment. Twenty-four patients (77%) had three vessels, 6 (20%) two vessels and 1 (3%) single vessel disease. Saphenous vein grafts aged 9.7 +/- 4.2 years (range 1-19 years). Twenty-two lesions (63%) were located within the body of the saphenous graft, 8 (23%) at the graft/coronary artery anastomosis and 5 (14%) at the aorta/graft anastomosis. The indications for stent deployment included: suboptimal result from balloon angioplasty (defined as > or = 50% post-angioplasty residual stenosis) in 29/35 lesions (83%); post-angioplasty coronary dissection with threatening occlusion in 4/35 (11%); abrupt closure in 2/35 (6%). Patients were screened for death, myocardial infarction, bypass surgery and repeat angioplasty during in-hospital stay and after a follow-up of 12 +/- 8 months. Even-free survival curve was constructed by the Kaplan-Meier method. Stent deployment was successful in all patients. One stent was deployed in 24/35 lesions (69%), half Palmaz-Schatz stent in 6/35 (17%) and 2 or more stents in 5/35 (14%). The balloon/vessel ratio resulted of 1.0 +/- 0.1 Minimal lumen diameter increased from 0.8 +/- 0.4 to 3.8 +/- 0.6 mm, with a mean gain of 1.8 +/- 0.6 mm (range 1.8-4.0 mm). During the in-hospital period 1 patient (3.2%) died and 1 (3.2%) had a non Q wave myocardial infarction. Therefore, the clinical success rate, was 94%. During the follow-up period, 2 patients died (6.9%), 2 (6.9%) developed a non Q wave myocardial infarction, 1 (3.4%) underwent bypass surgery and 3 (10.3%) underwent repeat angioplasty. The estimated 2-year event-free survival rate (free from myocardial infarction, repeat surgery and repeat angioplasty) was 62%. In conclusion, Palmaz-Schatz stent deployment in focal, de novo vein grafts presents a high rate of procedural success, a low rate of acute complications and good long-term results.     

The oxidative metabolism of catecholamines in the brain: a review

The EBI (BARD-XT, C.R. Bard, Murray Hill, NJ) stent is a new radiopaque balloon expandable coronary stent with high resistance to external radial forces. It does not shorten significantly with expansion and allows stent implantation in bifurcation lesions. A total of 28 EBI stents were implanted in 23 lesions in 21 patients. Indications for stent implantation were acute closure in 1, threatened closure in 15, and electively in 7 lesions. In 2 cases, the lesion involved a bifurcation where a stent was implanted in both vessels. All patients received aspirin and ticlopidine. No anticoagulant therapy was given. The stenting procedure was successful in 22 of 23 lesions. No complications occurred with the exception of 1 patient with a thrombotic reocclusion within 1 hr after stent implantation and 1 patient with a temporary occlusion of a side branch. The mean minimal luminal diameter (MLD) increased from 0.74+/-0.46 mm before balloon dilatation to 1.27+/-0.62 mm before stent implantation and 2.32+/-0.57 mm after stent implantation. Percent stenosis decreased from 71+/-19% before angioplasty to 46+/-25% after angioplasty to 5+/-8% after stent implantation. MLD at the time of follow-up angiography after 4 months was 1.98+/-0.77 mm and percent stenosis was 26+/-21%. Restenosis of more than 50% occurred in 2 lesions. In these lesions, a second percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty was performed. Advantages of this stent are its flexibility together with an acceptable radial strength as well as enabling radiopacity without obscuring the arterial lumen. Stenting of bifurcation lesions is possible.     

Are directional coronary atherectomy and Palmaz-Schatz stent more efficacious than conventional balloon angioplasty for treating de novo coronary artery lesions?

It is unclear whether new devices such as directional coronary atherectomy (DCA) or Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation improve long-term outcomes compared with conventional balloon angioplasty in patients with stable angina and de novo coronary artery lesions of type A or type B except for complete occlusive lesions investigated by the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. A total of 146 patients with stable angina and simple lesions were assigned to either conventional balloon angioplasty (62 patients), DCA (50 patients), or Palmaz-Schatz implantation (34 patients). The acute results and late outcomes were assessed by coronary angiography. The results of the three procedures were similar with respect to procedural success and complications. Patients who underwent stenting or DCA had a larger immediate increase in the diameter of the lumen and a larger luminal diameter immediately after the procedure than those who underwent balloon angioplasty. At six months follow-up, the patients treated by stenting continued to have a larger luminal diameter and a lower rate of restenosis than those treated with balloon angioplasty (2.30 +/- 0.66 vs 1.85 +/- 0.83 mm, p < 0.005; 5.9% vs 29%, p < 0.05) and DCA (2.30 +/- 0.66 vs 1.90 +/- 0.96 mm, p < 0.05; 5.9% vs 24%, NS). The patients treated with balloon angioplasty had a smaller late loss than those treated with DCA or Palmaz-Schatz stent. The patients treated with DCA had a larger loss index than those treated with balloon angioplasty or Palmaz-Schatz stent. Stenting was a significant factor in decreasing the rate of restenosis by logistic regression analysis, compared with balloon angioplasty. The angiographic outcomes were better in patients who received a stent than in those who received other treatments. This study suggests that even lesions stable for treatment by balloon angioplasty and DCA can also be treated with Palmaz-Schatz stents.