Operative outcome and hospital cost

INTRODUCTION: Because of concern about increasing health care costs, we undertook a study to find patient risk factors associated with increased hospital costs and to evaluate the relationship between increased cost and in-hospital mortality and serious morbidity. METHODS: More than 100 patient variables were screened in 1221 patients undergoing cardiac procedures. Simultaneously, patient hospital costs were computed from the cost-to-charge ratio. Univariate and multivariate statistics were used to explore the relationship between hospital cost and patient outcomes, including operative death, in-hospital morbidity, and length of stay. RESULTS: The greatest costs were for 31 patients who did not survive operation ($74,466, 95% confidence interval $27,102 to $198,025), greater than the costs for 120 patients who had serious, nonfatal morbidity ($60,335, 95% confidence interval $28,381 to $130,897, p = 0.02) and those for 1070 patients who survived operation without complication ($31,459, 95% confidence interval $21,944 to $49,849, p = 0.001). Breakdown of the components of hospital costs in fatalities and in cases with nonfatal complications revealed that the greatest contributions were in anesthesia and operating room costs. Significant (by stepwise linear regression analysis) independent risks for increased hospital cost were as follows (in order of decreasing importance): (1) preoperative congestive heart failure, (2) serum creatinine level greater than 2.5 mg/dl, (3) New York state predicted mortality risk, (4), type of operation (coronary artery bypass grafting, valve, valve plus coronary artery bypass grafting, or other), (5) preoperative hematocrit, (6) need for reoperative procedure, (7) operative priority, and (8) sex. These risks were different than those for in-hospitality death or increased length of stay. Hospital cost correlated with length of stay (r = 0.63, p < 0.001), but there were many outliers at the high end of the hospital cost spectrum. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that operative death is the most costly outcome; length of stay is an unreliable indicator of hospital cost, especially at the high end of the cost spectrum; risks of increased hospital cost are different than those for perioperative mortality or increased length of stay; and ventricular dysfunction in elderly patients undergoing urgent operations for other than coronary disease is associated with increased cost. Certain patient factors, such as preoperative anemia and congestive heart failure, are amenable to preoperative intervention to reduce costs, and a high-risk patient profile can serve as a target for cost-reduction strategies.     

Morbidity, cost, and six-month outcome of minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting (MIDCABG) promises to reduce the morbidity of coronary bypass, but this has not been proved. METHODS: This retrospective study compares the morbidity, mortality, cost, and 6-month outcome of patients less than 80 years old undergoing elective left internal mammary artery to left anterior descending artery bypass grafting via MIDCABG (n = 60) or sternotomy (n = 55) between January 1995 and December 1996. There were no differences between the groups in mean age, sex distribution, or preoperative risk level. The left internal mammary artery was mobilized from the fifth costal cartilage to the subclavian artery in all patients. The anastomoses were done with a beating heart in the MIDCABG group and with cardioplegic arrest in the sternotomy group. RESULTS: There were no operative deaths in either group. The MIDCABG patients had a lower transfusion incidence (10/60 [17%] versus 22/55 [40%]; p< or =0.02) and a shorter postoperative intubation time (2.1+/-4.2 versus 12.6+/-9 hours; p< or =0.0001). One patient in each group was reexplored for bleeding. Three sternotomy patients (3/55, 5%) required ventilatory support for greater than 48 hours, but no MIDCABG patient was ventilated for more than 24 hours. Median postoperative length of stay was 4 days for MIDCABG and 7 days for sternotomy. Estimated hospital costs were $11,200+/-3100 for MIDCABG and $15,600+/-4200 for CABG (p < 0.001). The reduced morbidity and cost of MIDCABG was found mostly in high-risk patients. At 6-month follow-up, 5 MIDCABG patients (5/60, 8%) had evidence of recurrent ischemia involving the left anterior descending artery, primarily the result of anastomotic stricture. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis shows that MIDCABG reduces the initial morbidity and cost of coronary bypass, but some patients require subsequent reintervention. Long-term follow-up is needed before MIDCABG can be judged better than traditional bypass, but the initial results are promising, especially in high-risk patients.     

Late survival after valve operation in patients with left ventricular dysfunction

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular dysfunction is a predictor of hospital mortality after cardiac valve operation. We evaluated late survival in a large cohort of these patients. METHODS: From 1980 to 1993, 257 patients with a preoperative ejection fraction of 0.40 or less underwent aortic (n = 177), mitral (n = 72), or combined (n = 8) valve operation, with or without concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting. RESULTS: Hospital mortality was 12.5%. Follow-up was 98% complete. Logistic regression analysis showed that an ejection fraction of less than 0.30, mitral regurgitation, concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting, emergency operation, and reoperation were independent correlates of hospital mortality (all at p < 0.05). Kaplan-Meier survival curves of the 220 hospital survivors showed a 65% 5-year survival. Multivariate analysis revealed preoperative use of diuretics, male sex, reoperation, age exceeding 60 years, and aortic regurgitation to be independent predictors of poor late outcome (all at p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The liability of left ventricular dysfunction with regard to diminished long-term survival is not completely reversed by valve operation. If operation is not performed before left ventricular dysfunction develops, postoperative medical treatment of these dilated, remodeled ventricles should be considered.     

A national study of postoperative mortality associated with coronary artery bypass grafting in Israel. ISCAB Consortium. Israel Coronary Artery Bypass Study

BACKGROUND: Investigation of observed differences in outcomes among medical centers is of major interest to the medical community and the public and has a substantial impact on efforts to improve the quality of medical care. METHODS: This study analyzed data from consecutive patients who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting at 14 medical centers. Data included demographic and clinical information, comorbidity, cardiac catheterization results, and 30-day postoperative vitality status. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify variables associated with mortality. An outlier hospital was defined as one having an observed mortality outside the 95% confidence interval boundaries around the expected mortality rate calculated, given the patient risk factors. RESULTS: The overall crude 30-day mortality rate for isolated coronary artery bypass grafting among the 4,835 patients in this study was 3.1%. The rate varied among centers, ranging from 0.85% to 7.05%. Predictors of 30-day mortality included advanced age, female sex, diabetes mellitus, poor left ventricular function, high creatinine level, high priority of operation, and three-vessel disease (with or without left main coronary artery disease). After adjustment for risk factors, two hospitals were defined as outliers. CONCLUSIONS: The observed disparity in early mortality among patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting is not due solely to differences in case mix.     

Risk factors for postoperative morbidity

OBJECTIVE: Analysis of outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting has focused on risk factors for operative mortality. Nonfatal perioperative morbidity is far more costly and more common after operation. To identify the risk factors that lead to postoperative morbidity, we evaluated 938 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting at Albany Medical Center Hospital during 1993. METHODS: Multivariate statistical analysis was performed on preoperative patient variables to identify risk factors for either serious postoperative morbidity or increased hospital length of stay. Variables were considered both individually and in combination. For example, age was considered individually or in combination with other variables, including parameters of blood volume (i.e., age divided by red blood cell volume or Age/RBCVOL). Similar multivariate analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors for hospital mortality. RESULTS: In order of decreasing importance, the following patient variables were significantly associated with increased length of stay by stepwise Cox regression analysis: Age/RBCVOL, history of congestive heart failure, hypertension, femoral-popliteal peripheral vascular disease, chronic obstructive lung disease, and renal dysfunction. The combination variable, Age/RBCVOL, was an important risk factor for both increased length of stay and serious postoperative morbidity. Variables that were significant independent predictors of increased mortality, such as preoperative shock, and redo operation, were not risk factors for either serious morbidity or increased length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that risk factors for postoperative morbidity are different from those for postoperative mortality. These results suggest that older patients with preoperative anemia and low blood volume who also have other comorbidities (congestive heart failure, stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or hypertension) are at increased risk for postoperative complications. This allows identification of a high-risk cohort of patients who are likely candidates for interventions to lessen postoperative morbidity.     

Minimally invasive treatment for coronary artery disease

Coronary artery disease is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States. One advancement in the treatment of this disease is the minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) procedure, which is an alternative to the traditional open heart bypass procedure. The MIDCAB procedure is becoming a viable alternative to the traditional coronary artery bypass grafting procedure for a select group of patients. With further experience and follow-up, this procedure will offer lower hospital costs by decreasing lengths of stay and offering patients the optimal conduit for coronary artery bypass grafting without the complications of cardiopulmonary bypass.     

Surgical treatment of ischemic heart disease complicated with severe left ventricular dysfunction: experience in 200 cases

BACKGROUND: The study was designed to evaluate short and long-term benefits of coronary artery bypass graft in patients with coronary artery disease and severely depressed left ventricular ejection fraction and to identify contemporary risk factors associated with significantly greater mortality in this high-risk subgroup. METHODS: From 1985 to 1995, 200 consecutive pts with EF < or = 0.30 underwent CABG. Among these patients, 60% were older than 70 years. NYHA functional class III/IV was present in 31% of pts. Preoperative mean cardiac index was 2.7 +/- 7 l/min/m2, mean pulmonary artery pressure was 29.9 +/- 7 mm Hg and contractility score (generated by appropriate software for left ventricular kinesis analysis) mean value was 50.1 +/- 11.6 points. Urgent operation was required in 32 pts (16%). The majority of pts were completely revascularized. RESULTS: Operative mortality was 9% (18 pts). Low output syndrome was the most common postoperative complication (13.5%) followed by ventricular arrhythmia (8%), mean length of postoperative hospitalization for survivors was 13 +/- 10 days. Of 23 possible operative risk factors evaluated, four were associated with significantly greater mortality: cardiac index < or = 2.1 l/min/m2, urgent operation, contractility score > or = 80 and associated surgical procedures. Survivors experienced significant improvement in CHF class (p < 0.001) and follow up EF (p < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier estimate of survival at 1 year, 5 years and 8 years was 85%, 65% and 54%. CONCLUSION: Through more careful assessment of preoperative risk factors, patients selection and perioperative management, actually coronary artery bypass graft may be offered to pts with low ejection fraction with reduced morbidity and mortality.     

Central venous catheter use in low-risk coronary artery bypass grafting

BACKGROUND: To assess the impact of central venous pressure catheter monitoring in low-risk coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), we compared the hospital course of patients undergoing CABG with central venous pressure catheter monitoring with that of similar patients undergoing CABG with pulmonary artery catheter monitoring. METHODS: All isolated primary CABG procedures (n = 312) performed between April 22 and October 31, 1996, were evaluated, and 194 patients meeting six central venous pressure catheter use criteria were identified. Of these 194 patients, 133 (68%) underwent CABG with central venous pressure catheter monitoring, and 61 (32%) had pulmonary artery catheter monitoring owing to surgeon or anesthesiologist preference. RESULTS: In-hospital mortality was similar. A trend toward increased overall complications was seen in the pulmonary artery catheter group. The total volume infused in the first 12 hours, the 24-hour weight gain, and the intubation time were significantly greater in the pulmonary artery catheter group. Increases in intensive care unit length of stay and in total hospital charges trended toward statistical significance in the pulmonary artery catheter group. CONCLUSIONS: Pulmonary artery catheter use in low-risk patients undergoing CABG was associated with greater weight gain and longer intubation time and may be associated with increased morbidity and utilization of hospital resources.     

Female sex is associated with increased mortality and morbidity early, but not late, after coronary artery bypass grafting

OBJECTIVE: To describe mortality and morbidity during a period of 2 years after coronary artery bypass grafting in relation to gender. DESIGN: Prospective follow-up study. SETTING: Two regional cardiothoracic centres which performed all the coronary artery bypass operations in western Sweden at the time. SUBJECTS: A total of 2129 (1727 (81%) men and 402 (19%) women) consecutive patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery between June 1988 and June 1991 without concomitant procedures. RESULTS: Females were older and more frequently had a history of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, renal dysfunction and obesity. In a multivariate analysis, taking account of age, history of cardiovascular diseases and renal dysfunction, female sex appeared as a significant independent predictor of mortality during the 30 days after coronary artery bypass grafting (P < 0.05), but not thereafter. Various postoperative complications including neurological deficit, hydro- and pneumo-thorax, perioperative myocardial damage and the need for assist devices and prolonged reperfusion were more common in females than males. CONCLUSION: Females run an increased risk of early death and the development of postoperative complications after coronary artery bypass surgery as compared with males. Late mortality does not appear to be influenced by gender and the long-term benefit of the coronary artery bypass graft operation is similar in men and women.     

Effects of different protective agents on the phototoxicity of fluoranthene to Daphnia magna

OBJECTIVE: To determine if a risk prediction model for patients with unstable angina would predict resource utilization. METHODS AND RESULTS: Four hundred sixty-five consecutive patients admitted for unstable angina to a tertiary care university-based medical center were prospectively evaluated from June 1, 1992, to June 30, 1995. The proportion of patients receiving coronary angiography, coronary angioplasty, and coronary artery bypass grafting were analyzed according to four risk groups on the basis of a previously published model: Group 1, <2% risk of major complication; Group 2, 2.1% to 5% risk; Group 3, 5.1 % to 15% risk; and Group 4, >15.1 % risk. Hospital length of stay and estimated cost of hospitalization based on DRG and specific payer ratio of cost-to-charge were also compared between groups. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to determine the influence of estimated risk and procedures on hospital costs. The four groups were well matched for gender, hypertension, tobacco history, and previous percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and myocardial infarction. Group 4 had a higher incidence of previous coronary bypass grafting (35% vs 10%, p=0.001) and triple vessel or left main coronary artery disease compared with Group 1 (44% vs 13%, p=0.041). Group 4 patients were more likely to be admitted to the coronary care unit compared with Group 2 or Group 1 patients (80% vs Group 1: 51% [p= 0.001]; and vs Group 2: 53% [p=0.001]), more likely to receive heparin (87% vs 71%, p=0.007), and more likely to receive a beta-blocker or calcium channel blocker (89% vs 74%, p=0.008) than Group 1. Coronary angioplasty rates were similar for all groups, but Group 4 patients were more likely to receive coronary bypass grafting than Group 2 or Group 1 (27% vs Group 2: 12%, p=0.004 and vs Group 1: 8%, p=0.002). Hospital length of stay was highest in Group 4 and lowest for Group 1. Average hospital costs were significantly less in Group 3 than in Group 4, but higher than in Group 1. Multivariate analysis determined a dependency of costs on risk group with Group 2 having costs 31.4% (95% CI=9.8 to 57.2), Group 3 46.7% (24, 3 to 73.1), and Group 4 75% (46.9 to 110.7) higher than Group 1. The use of procedures also significantly increased costs, with PTCA-treated patients having a 44.9% (26.7 to 65.7) increase in costs compared with medically treated patients, and surgically treated patients having a 204.7% increase in costs. CONCLUSION: Resource utilization as assessed by the use of revascularization procedures, length of stay, and hospital costs are influenced by patient acuity estimated from a prediction model on the basis of estimated risk of cardiac complications. The model exerts independent influence on cost even after adjustment for various procedures. The use of revascularization procedures, especially coronary artery surgery, remains a large determinant of hospital cost.     

Tracking the MEN1 gene

Combined carotid endarterectomy and coronary artery bypass grafting was performed in 52 patients between January 1982 and September 1994. Forty-nine patients had stable or unstable angina and three had symptom-free coronary artery disease detected by stress testing. Thirty-one patients had triple-vessel disease and 17 had left main trunk or left main equivalent coronary artery disease. Five patients had symptom-free carotid artery disease, 12 had non-specific neurological symptoms, and 35 had transient ischaemic attacks. Carotid endarterectomy was performed first, followed by coronary artery bypass grafting. There were three postoperative deaths, two cardiac and one neurological, for a mortality rate of 5.8%. One patient suffered a permanent neurological deficit (1.9%). It is concluded that combined carotid endarterectomy/coronary artery bypass grafting can be performed in selected patients with acceptable neurological morbidity, although cardiac mortality was not eliminated by the combined approach.     

Interferon-gamma-inducing factor gene transfection into Lewis lung carcinoma cells reduces tumorigenicity in vivo

The operative mortality and morbidity in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction who undergo coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remain high. The low ejection fraction is the major risk factor for operative mortality. However, ejection fraction (EF) alone may not necessarily be an accurate predictor of operative mortality. We studied the correlation between indices of left ventricular volume and operative mortality. One thousand patients undergoing isolated coronary bypass operations were divided into three groups according to their preoperative ejection fraction. Fifty patients (group I) had severe left ventricular dysfunction (EF < or = 0.3), 56 patients (group II) had moderately left ventricular dysfunction (0.3 < EF < or = 0.4) and 894 patients (group III) had good left ventricular function (EF > 0.4). We analyzed the relationship between hospital mortality and left ventricular volume in 106 patients with an EF < or = 0.4. RESULTS: Cardiac index was not significantly different among the three groups. The left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) and mean pulmonary artery pressure in groups I an II were higher than those in group III. The left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) was 146 +/- 44 ml/m2 in Group I, 112 +/- 31 ml/m2 in Group II and 82 + 30 ml/m2 in Group III, respectively (Group I versus II, p < 0.05, Group I and II versus III, p < 0.01). The left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) was 111 +/- 38 ml/m2 in Group I, 72 +/- 21 ml/m2 in Group II and 30 +/- 14 ml/m2 in Group III, respectively (Group I versus II, p < 0.05, Group I and II versus III, p < 0.01). The LVEDV and LVESV were higher in Group I than in Group II and both in Groups I and II were higher than in Group III. The hospital mortality of any cause before discharge was 8.0% (4/50) in Group I, 3.6% (2/56) in Group II, and 2.0% (18/894) in Group III. The mortality in Group I was higher than that in Group III, but the mortality between Groups I and II was not different. We assessed correlations between large left ventricle with left ventricular dysfunction and operative mortality in 106 patients with ejection fractions of < or = 0.4. The hospital mortality in patients with both under fraction 0.4 and an LVESV > or = 140 ml/m2 was 50% (4/8). This rate was higher than in patients with an LVESV between 80 and 140 ml/m2 (1.8%, 1/55) (p = 0.0006) and an LVESV less than 80 ml/m2 (2.3%, 1/43), (p = 0.0013). The hospital mortality in patients with an LVEDV > or = 200 ml/m2 was 67% (4/6). It was also higher than that in patients with an LVEDV between 200 and 120 ml/m2 (1.7%, 1/58), (p = 0.0001), and an LVEDV less than 120 ml/m2 (2.4%, 1/42), (p = 0.0004). We conclude that patients with a low ejection fraction and an elevated LVESV or LVEDV are at increased risk for hospital death following CABG.     

Preoperative predictors of cost in Medicare-age patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting

BACKGROUND: Identification of preoperative factors that contribute to the cost of coronary artery bypass grafting could aid in predicting the procedure's expense. In this study, 30 sociodemographic and clinical preoperative factors were examined with "survival analysis" techniques to determine characteristics related to total hospital cost. METHODS: Characteristics of all patients age 65 or older undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting from July 1993 to April 1995 (n = 757) were recorded. Software was developed within the hospital's Transitions Systems, Inc, database to calculate the outcome variable of total cost. Nonparametric methods were used for the univariate analysis of the data, and the Cox proportional hazards model was used for the multivariable analysis, censoring 25 patients who died in the hospital. RESULTS: Median hospital cost from the day of the operation until discharge was $15,198. Median length of stay after the operation was 6 days. Multivariable analysis revealed that age, preoperative renal failure, history of cerebrovascular accident, low ejection fraction, and surgical urgency were independent predictors of total cost. CONCLUSIONS: This study, using an accurate representation of true hospital cost and a modeling technique that accounts for the confounding effect of in-hospital death on cost, provides a template for analysis of cost in other patient groups.     

Preoperative prediction of postoperative morbidity in coronary artery bypass grafting

BACKGROUND: The risk factors of patients selected for coronary artery bypass grafting have increased in recent years because of the aging population. Prediction of postoperative complications is essential for optimal use of the available resources. The aim of this study was to develop a scoring method for prediction of postoperative morbidity of individual patients undergoing bypass grafting. METHODS: Data from 386 consecutive patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting in a single center were retrospectively collected. The relationship between the preoperative risk factors and the postoperative morbidity was analyzed by the Bayesian approach. Three risk indices (15-factor and seven-factor computed and seven-factor manual models) were developed for the prediction of morbidity. The criterion for morbidity was a prolonged hospital stay postoperatively (> 12 days) because of adverse events. RESULTS: The best predictive preoperative factors for increased morbidity were emergency operation, diabetes, rhythm other than sinus rhythm on the electrocardiogram or recent myocardial infarction, low ejection fraction (< 0.49), age greater than 70 years, decreased renal function, chronic pulmonary disease, cerebrovascular disease, and obesity. The sensitivity of the scoring methods ranged from 51% to 72% and the specificity, from 77% to 86%. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that individual patients can be stratified according to postoperative risk for complications on the basis of preoperative information that is available for most patients.     

The unequal clinical profile, quality of life and hospital mortality in patients undergoing aortocoronary bypass in the public and private centers of Catalonia. The CIRCORCA Study

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: The influence of the type of health care funding and management of hospital centres on hospital mortality in coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) has not been analyzed in detail. We therefore assessed clinical and quality of life preoperative profiles and in-hospital mortality in public and private patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery in Catalonia. METHODS: Clinical questionnaires, Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) and SF-36 were preoperatively administered to all patients undergoing first coronary bypass surgery without associated procedures in Catalonia between November 1996-June 1997. In-hospital morbidity and mortality were recorded. RESULTS: Predictors of in-hospital death, including DASI, SF-36 and comorbidity scores, were significantly worse in public than in private patients. In-hospital mortality rate was more than ten times greater in public than in private patients (8.2% vs 0.7%; p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified private funding of health care, among others, as an independent predictor of in-hospital survival. Non evidence-based indications for surgery were significantly more common in private than in public patients (6% vs 0.7%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: a) In catalonia, the risk profile of public patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery was significantly higher than that of private patients, accounting, at least in part, for a remarkable mortality difference; b) non evidence-based indications for surgery were more common in private than in public patients; c) these unequal patterns raise questions about the adequacy of care and referral patterns in both private and public sectors.     

Intraoperative echocardiography is indicated in high-risk coronary artery bypass grafting

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative echocardiography is a valuable monitoring and diagnostic technology used in cardiac surgery. This reports our clinical study of the usefulness of intraoperative echocardiography to both surgeons and anesthesiologists for high-risk coronary artery bypass grafting. METHODS: From March to November 1995, 82 consecutive high-risk patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting were studied in a four-stage protocol to determine the efficacy of intraoperative echocardiography in management planning. Alterations in surgical and anesthetic/hemodynamic management initiated by intraoperative echocardiography findings were documented in addition to perioperative morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: Intraoperative echocardiography initiated at least one major surgical management alteration in 27 patients (33%) and at least one major anesthetic/hemodynamic change in 42 (51%). Mortality and the rate of myocardial infarction in this consecutive high-risk study population using intraoperative echocardiography and in a similar group of patients without the use of intraoperative echocardiography was 1.2% versus 3.8% (not significant) and 1.2% versus 3.5% (not significant), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that when all of the isolated diagnostic and monitoring applications of perioperative echocardiography are routinely and systematically performed together, it is a safe and viable tool that significantly affects the decision-making process in the intraoperative care of high-risk patients undergoing primary isolated coronary artery bypass grafting and may contribute to the optimal care of these patients.     

Safety and cost-effectiveness of MIDCABG in high-risk CABG patients

BACKGROUND: Myocardial revascularization without cardiopulmonary bypass has been proposed as a potential therapeutic alternative in high-risk patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. To evaluate this possibility we compared 15 high-risk (HR) patients in whom minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting was used as the method of revascularization with 41 consecutive patients who underwent conventional coronary artery bypass grafting during 1 month. METHODS: Patients undergoing myocardial revascularization without cardiopulmonary bypass were significantly older than their low-risk (LR) counterparts (72.2 +/- 11.6 versus 63.3 +/- 9.7 years, p = 0.006). The demographic profile for HR versus LR patients was as follows: female patients, 60.0% versus 26.8%, p = 0.02; diabetes, 20.0% versus 24.4%, p = 0.7; prior stroke, 33.3% versus 7.4%, p = 0.03; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 60.0% versus 9.8%, p < 0.0001; peripheral vascular disease, 33.3% versus 12.2%, p = 0.03, congestive heart failure, 26.6% versus 9.8%, p = 0.09; impaired left ventricular (ejection fraction < 0.40), 40.0% versus 17.0%, p = 0.07; urgent operation, 86.6% versus 46.3%, p < 0.0001; and redo operation, 20.0% versus 0%, p = 0.003. RESULTS: There were no deaths in the HR group and one death in the LR group. The average intensive care unit stay was 1.1 +/- 0.5 days in HR patients versus 1.6 +/- 1.6 days in LR individuals (p = 0.2), and the average hospital stay was 6.1 +/- 1.8 versus 7.3 +/- 4.4 days, respectively (p = 0.3). We used an acuity risk score index developed by the Adult Cardiac Care Network of Ontario to predict outcome in the HR group. The expected intensive care unit stay in HR patients was 4.1 +/- 1.2 days (versus the observed stay of 1.1 +/- 0.5 days, p < 0.0001), and the expected hospital stay was 12.5 +/- 1.5 days (versus the observed stay of 6.1 +/- 1.8 days, p < 0.0001). The expected mortality in the HR group was 6.1% versus 0%, p = 0.3. A cost regression model was used to examine predicted versus actual cost (in Canadian dollars) for the HR patient cohort (based on Ontario Ministry of Health funding). The expected cost for the HR cohort would have been $11,997 per patient. In contrast, the average cost for these 15 patients was $5,997 per patient, an estimated cost saving of 50%. CONCLUSIONS: Myocardial revascularization without cardiopulmonary bypass appears to be a safe and cost-effective therapeutic modality for HR patients requiring myocardial revascularization.     

Coronary artery bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass

In off-pump coronary artery grafting, cardiopulmonary bypass and its associated maneuvers, i.e., aortic manipulation and global cardiac arrest, may be avoided, and thus its morbidity and mortality may be reduced. Modern tissue stabilizers allow accurate construction of anastomosis and are now considered indispensable. Currently, there are two groups of stabilizers, i.e., those based on suction-fixation and those based on pressure-fixation. Each has specific applications. The popularity of off-pump coronary bypass surgery is increasing, from the patient's perspective and from the perspective of cost containment. Proper patient selection is crucial. The procedure is technically demanding. It is expected that by the year 2000 10% of coronary surgery will be off-pump, particularly by direct vision techniques. From the currently available, nonrandomized, prospective studies, the preliminary conclusion seems justified that, in selected patients, off-pump bypass grafting is as accurate as conventional bypass grafting, with lower morbidity and mortality. This includes fast recovery and early resumption of premorbid activities in most patients. Particularly, therefore, the procedure is also cost saving. Prospective randomized studies are necessary to quantify these statements.     

Perioperative risk factors affecting hospital stay and hospital costs in open heart surgery for patients > or = 65 years old

OBJECTIVE: Demographic changes, associated with increased demands for open heart surgery in the elderly, place increased burden on financial resources. To evaluate perioperative risk factors affecting incidence of hospital events and estimation of hospital charges, 2577 patients > or = 65 years (range 65-91), operated on from January 1991 to December 1994, were compared with a concurrent cohort of 2642 younger patients. METHODS: Statistical analysis, by surgical procedure, focused on hospital mortality, key postoperative complications affecting length of hospital stay and hospital charges. RESULTS: Overall hospital mortality was 4.7%, 3.5% in younger patients versus 6.1% in the older group (P < 0.01). Mortality was significantly lower in patients less than 65 years undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (3% versus 5%, P < 0.01) and valve replacement (4% versus 9%, P = 0.01). Significant risk factors for hospital death in the elderly: diabetes (P < 0.01), hypertension (P < 0.01), myocardial infarction (P < 0.01) and congestive heart failure (P < 0.01). Significant postoperative events, more common in older patients, included prolonged ventilation (P < 0.01), congestive heart failure (P < 0.01), infection (P < 0.01), cerebrovascular accident (P < 0.01), and intra aortic balloon pump (P < 0.01). Incremental risk factors for morbidity in the elderly were: higher New York Heart Association class, congestive heart failure, emergent operation, and female gender. Mean length of hospital stay for the < 65 group was 15.3 versus > 19.5 days for the > 65 group (P < 0.01). Length of stay over 18 days positively correlated with increased morbidity in both age groups. For patients > or = 65 years of age, the average hospital charge for open heart surgery was 172% higher for patients with a length of stay greater than 18 days compared with 165% for patients less than 65 years of age. CONCLUSIONS: Higher operative mortality and longer length of stay in elderly patients, resulting in increased health care costs, was associated with more co-morbidities. These results suggest interventions designed to reduce congestive heart failure and other co-morbidities may improve patient's recovery and reduce costs.     

Does arterial revascularization decrease the risk of infarction after coronary artery bypass grafting?

BACKGROUND: This study sought to determine whether extensive arterial grafting reduces the prevalence and consequences of infarct after coronary artery bypass grafting. METHODS: Post-primary coronary artery bypass grafting infarcts and time-related events thereafter were identified by 99.9% complete follow-up of 9,600 patients (1971 to 1992). The contribution of arterial grafting to freedom from infarct was assessed by multivariable hazard function analysis to adjust for other risk factors. RESULTS: Unadjusted 1-month and 10-year freedom from infarction was 97% and 86%. By multivariable analysis, arterial grafting lowered the prevalence of periprocedural (p = 0.005), intermediate term (p = 0.007 and 0.006), and late infarction (arterial grafting to the left anterior descending coronary artery, p = 0.0006). Unadjusted survival after first infarct after coronary artery bypass grafting was 74% and 52% at 1 and 10 years; arterial grafting improved 10-year survival from 48% to 59% (p = 0.002). An additional benefit or cost of extending arterial grafting (n = 1,727) beyond a single one could not be identified (p > 0.1). CONCLUSIONS: Arterial conduits, particularly to the left anterior descending coronary artery, should be used for coronary artery bypass grafting to reduce early and late myocardial infarction and its consequences. However, use of more than a single arterial graft appears to confer no additional benefit.