共查询到18条相似文献,搜索用时 62 毫秒
1.
2.
文章提出了一种关于移动IP中同一个外地代理下和不同外地代理下切换的新方法,并通过比较说明新方法的优点。 相似文献
3.
IP微移动是一种能够在移动过程中有效改善移动节点通信质量的移动性管理方式,其核心部分为切换管理。该文首先分析了IP微移动的切换过程,并从网络层切换和链路层切换的关系及其交互性的新视角提出了切换管理的分类方法,详细分析和研究了目前典型的IP微移动协议的特点和存在的问题,并给出对这些协议的性能比较,最后讨论了IP微移动切换管理的未来研究方向。 相似文献
4.
5.
6.
7.
在介绍了移动IP及其切换原理的基础上.针对移动环境下移动节点的频繁切换造成的切换延迟大的情况,提出了基于层次管理结构的移动IP切换方案,能够有效地实现快速切换。 相似文献
8.
9.
移动IP及基于IPv6的切换 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
本文首先对移动IP的工作原理作了简单的介绍,进而提出作为未来移动网络首选的移动IPv6协议的特点。在此基础上,对基于IPv6的各种切换方案作了深入的探讨,引入了类比于3G移动通信切换的思路,提出了基于IPv6切换的下一步研究方向。 相似文献
10.
11.
在下一代互联网中,服务质量(QoS)的提高已经变得非常重要,而在下一代移动互联网中,由于移动用户的频繁移动使得基于服务质量的移动切换管理变得更加复杂,提出了一种新的基于服务质量和扁平化管理思想的下一代移动IP架构——移动代理扁平架构(MAFS),该架构可以在移动用户频繁移动时提供良好的服务质量保证和移动切换管理。 相似文献
12.
Mobile IP中的切换将会导致数据包的丢失。平滑切换避免了数据包的丢失,却可能导致数据包的失序。文章分析了已有的减少失序数据包的方案的不足,提出了新的改进方案,并进行了评估,证明了其优越性。 相似文献
13.
Heba Nashaat Rawya Rizk Hani Mahdi 《International Journal of Wireless Information Networks》2011,18(4):210-223
Mobile IP has been developed to provide the continuous information network access to mobile users. The performance of Mobile
IP mobility management scheme is dependent on traffic characteristics and user mobility. Consequently, it is important to
assess this performance in-depth through these factors. This paper introduces a novel analytical model of handoff management
in mobile IP networks. The proposed model focuses on the effect the traffic types and their frame error rates on the handoff
latency. It is derived based on general distribution of both successful transmission attempts and the residence time to be
applicable in all cases of traffic characteristics and user mobility. The impact of the behavior of wireless connection, cell
residence time, probability distribution of transmission time and the handoff time is investigated. Numerical results are
obtained and presented for both TCP and UDP traffics. As expected, the reliability of TCP leads to higher handoff latency
than UDP traffic. It is shown that, higher values of FER increase the probability of erroneous packet transfer across the
link layer. A short retransmission time leads to end the connection most likely in the existing FA; however a long retransmission
time leads to a large delivery time. The proposed model is robust in the sense that it covers the impact of all the effective
parameters and can be easily extended to any distribution. 相似文献
14.
Over the last decade, we have witnessed a growing interest in the design and deployment of various network architectures and
protocols aimed at supporting mobile users as they move across different types of networks. One of the goals of these emerging
network solutions is to provide uninterrupted, seamless connectivity to mobile users giving them the ability to access information
anywhere, anytime. Handoff management, an important component of mobility management, is crucial in enabling such seamless
mobility across heterogeneous network infrastructures. In this work, we investigate the handoff performance of three of the
most widely used mobility protocols namely, Mobile IP, Session Initiation Protocol (SIP), and Stream Control Transmission
Protocol (SCTP). Our empirical handoff tests were executed on an actual heterogeneous network testbed consisting of wired,
wireless local area, and cellular networks using performance metrics such as handoff delay and handoff signaling time. Our
empirical results reveal that Mobile IP yields the highest handoff delay among the three mobility protocols. In addition,
we also found that SIP and SCTP yield 33 and 55% lower handoff delays respectively compared to Mobile IP. 相似文献
15.
为了减小基于MPLS的移动IP网络的信令开销、切换时延和切换丢包,人们提出了一种称为LSP扩展的移动性管理机制。LSP扩展存在两个问题:一是扩展的LSP可能存在环路;二是需要定义中止LSP扩展的准则。针对上述问题,该文首先给出了LSP扩展的环路消除技术,然后定义了中止扩展LSP的准则,即用户信息和信令信息代价函数;并理论分析了用户信息和信令信息代价函数的计算过程,讨论了如何通过该代价函数中止扩展LSP。性能分析结果表明,根据该准则中止扩展LSP能在较大程度上减小LSP扩展机制的开销。 相似文献
16.
Intelligent Handoff for Mobile Wireless Internet 总被引:6,自引:0,他引:6
Jon Chiung-Shien Wu Chieh-Wen Cheng Nen-Fu Huang Gin-Kou Ma 《Mobile Networks and Applications》2001,6(1):67-79
This paper presents an intelligent mobility management scheme for Mobile Wireless InterNet – MWIN. MWIN is a wireless service networks wherein its core network consisting of Internet routers and its access network can be built from any Internet-capable radio network. Two major standards are currently available for MWIN, i.e., the mobile IP and wireless LAN. Mobile IP solves address mobility problem with the Internet protocol while wireless LAN provides a wireless Internet access in the local area. However, both schemes solve problems independently at different layers, thereby some additional problems occur, e.g., delayed handoff, packet loss, and inefficient routing. This paper identifies these new problems and performs analyses and some real measurements on the handoff within MWIN. Then, a new handoff architecture that extends the features of both mobile IP and wireless LAN handoff mechanism was proposed. This new architecture consists of mobile IP extensions and a modified wireless LAN handoff algorithm. The effect of this enhancement provides a linkage between different layers for preventing packet loss and reducing handoff latency. Finally, some optimization issues regarding network planning and routing are addressed. 相似文献
17.
切换是蜂窝系统所独有的功能,也是移动通信系统的一个关键特征,它直接影响整个系统的性能。本文对移动通信系统中切换和切换算法进行了深入细致的研究,包括切换的分类和功能、性能指标、各种切换方式及算法的优缺点,提出了自己的建议及需要继续研究的问题。 相似文献
18.
Mobility management protocols operating from different layers of the classical protocol stack (e.g., link, network, transport, and application layers) have been proposed in the last several years. These protocols achieve different handoff performance for different types of applications. In this paper, mobile applications are grouped into five different classes, class A through class E, based on their mobility management requirements. Analytical models are developed to investigate the handoff performance of the existing mobility management protocols for these application classes. The analysis shows that applications of a particular class experience different handoff performance when different mobility management protocols are used. Handoff performance comparisons of different mobility management protocols are carried out to decide on the suitable mobility management protocol for a particular application class. The results of mathematical analysis advocate the use of transport layer mobility management for class B and class C applications, mobile IP for non-real-time class D and class E applications, and session initiation protocol-based mobility management for real-time class D and class E applications. Moreover, through analytical modeling, the parameters that influence the handoff performance of mobility management protocols are identified. These parameters can be used to design new application-adaptive techniques to enhance the handoff performance of the existing mobility management protocols. 相似文献