An introduction to psychologists treating medically ill patients: Competent practice and seeking credentials in organized health care settings for routine or incidental practice.

Psychology has been recognized as a health care science and profession, and psychologists have been working clinically with medically ill patients and within organized health care settings and hospitals for decades. The potentially daunting environment of organized health care should be seen by psychology as an opportunity to further develop and expand its scope of practice. With knowledge of that environment's rules, regulations, ethics, bylaws, and traditions, the clinically competent psychologist who is first seeking to practice in hospitals should succeed alongside psychologists with busy practices who are already exclusively or occasionally within an organized health care setting or medical facility. This article reviews issues of competency, credentialing, privileges, bylaws, and practice expansion to guide psychologists toward a successful hospital practice with medically ill patients. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

A step in the right direction: A resource for collaboration on health-related issues.

Reviews the book, Health-related disorders in children and adolescents edited by L. Phelps (see record 1998-07780-000). This edited text provides an overview of 96 medical conditions that place children at risk of developing psychological or educational problems. The central feature of this book is that it is intended as a reference tool for professionals who collaborate with medical professionals. Increasingly, there have been many vehicles for school psychologists to collaborate with medical professionals, including comprehensive school health care programs and school-based health clinics, and community-based coordinated services that provide children and youth comprehensive care. In this regard, school psychologists are likely to encounter increasing numbers of children who experience health disorders, along with more traditional areas of practice including mental health and educational issues. Although not a purely medically oriented text, Phelps has taken a perspective that school psychologists work within the context of a multidisciplinary team of professionals who are likely to provide services for these children. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and atypical antidepressants: A review and update for psychologists.

Psychologists are increasingly being required to care for patients who are concurrently undergoing pharmacological treatment, particularly when patients suffer from mood disorders, such as major depression. In addition, nonpsychiatric physicians are prescribing antidepressant medications with greater frequency, thereby increasing the likelihood that the physician with which the psychologist must collaborate will have a limited understanding of psychiatric illnesses. As independent mental health professionals, psychologists have a right and a responsibility to be actively engaged in all aspects of their patients' treatment, including pharmacotherapy. A prerequisite for providing this level of professional care is a solid grounding in the principles and actions of pharmacological agents. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Linking psychologists and family physicians for collaborative practice.

This article describes a pilot, demonstration project that linked psychologists and family physicians to improve the care of patients with alcohol and other drug abuse problems. The project facilitated collaborative practice between family physicians and psychologists to enhance treatment of patients with alcohol and other drug abuse and other psychosocial problems in rural America. Ten pairs of psychologists and family physicians in rural Texas and Wyoming participated in the project. The training successfully established linkages between psychologists and family physicians for the care of a broad range of medical and psychological problems. This article discusses the linkage training, factors that facilitated and hindered collaboration, as well as implications for future training and collaborative health care practice. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Interdisciplinary collaboration in outpatient practice.

Psychology has had a long history of collaboration with the medical profession. This collaboration has been greatly enhanced over the past decade or more as an increasing number of psychologists have become successful in applying the science and practice of psychology to the problems of health and illness. This article reviews and summarizes salient aspects of professional issues in practice that contribute to successful collaboration with physicians in primary and tertiary ambulatory health care settings. Practical strategies to enhance collaboration in independent practice are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Public and private responsibility for mental health services.

Relative to public services, private sector corporate mental health care has significantly increased since the late 1960s. The many tensions encountered in assigning public and private responsibility for mental health services give rise to significant value-laden questions for psychologists. These questions go to the heart of community mental health, deinstitutionalization, mental health policy development and evaluation, and many other areas in which psychologists are playing major roles. The public–private issue should be understood historically, from the twin vantage points of developments in general medicine and in mental health. Among the many public interest and public policy matters psychologists and others concerned with mental health should address are the emergence of corporate chains; the nature, cost, and quality of private sector services; the compatibility of profit motivation and the motivation to provide care; and patient selection issues (e.g., cream-skimming). Public and private cooperation and planning are certainly in order if the public interest is to be served in addressing the nation's mental health problems. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Communication and records: Hippa issues when working in health care settings.

To refocus awareness on the original mandate of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPPA) regulations, this article will review record keeping requirements and examine patient-doctor and interdisciplinary communication as a way to improve the health care consumer's trust in the privacy of their personal information while facilitating integrated and fluid health care delivery systems. The HIPPA rules especially important in medical settings are discussed with a special emphasis on issues confronting psychologists who practice outside of medical institutions and hospitals. The article also examines important implications for practice activities when psychologists attend patients who are hospitalized. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Psychologists' reactions to Medicaid managed care: Opinion and practice change after 1 year.

How do psychologists adapt over time to a new managed care program? Reactions of Iowan psychologists to a managed mental health care program for Medicaid recipients were examined. The program was generally perceived negatively, although perceptions improved over time. Psychologists in private practice decreased the proportion of Medicaid patients they treated. Psychologists who continued to treat Medicaid patients reported decreased levels of job autonomy and satisfaction. A new managed care program presents psychologists with difficult ethical decisions, in which the quality of care provided to clients must be weighed against the negative aspects of participating in a managed care program. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Hospital psychology in Canada.

Examined Canadian hospital psychology in terms of the existing organizational models, professional practices, academic activities, and professional orientations of hospital psychologists in a survey of 340 hospitals. Results reveal that psychologists were active clinically and academically in Canadian hospitals in a wide variety of health care areas in addition to traditional mental health areas. In the majority of hospitals, psychologists were organized in independent departments of psychology or behavioral science, although physician influence appeared to be a strong factor in practice. Medical staff membership and academic appointments for hospital psychologists were relatively low. Recommendations for the future development of hospital psychology in Canada are outlined. (French abstract) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2011 APA, all rights reserved)     

Public policy and public service: Our professional duty.

Psychology is a steadily maturing profession, and we psychologists are finally beginning to accept our societal responsibility to be involved in the public policy and political process. Although psychologists have shown increased involvement in the recent past, there are still many areas in which psychologists could become markedly more involved—especially in the area of programs that affect the quality of life of our nation's elderly, disabled, and poor citizens. As our profession seeks to become more active in the overall health care arena, we will, of necessity, begin to define the parameters of "quality of care" for other professions. In doing so, we must closely explore the "outer limits" of our own practice. We must ensure that all state and federal legislative (and administrative) policies do not impose arbitrary limitations on the scope of practice. To accomplish this objective, we must seek to influence our subset of our nation's health policy priorities and policies that we have traditionally shunned—the subset that affects "the public good." (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Rehabilitation: Psychology's greatest opportunity?

Rehabilitation (RHB) is one of the fastest growing areas in the health industry. Supported by several key pieces of legislation, psychologists have established themselves as integral health care providers in RHB. Although psychologists have benefited from legislated membership in RHB, most individual psychologists and the psychological associations have not recognized the importance of public policy for the practice of psychology. Escalating health care costs have resulted in major revisions in the manner in which health insurers reimburse treatment. Medicare, the major federal health insurance provider, increasingly has been viewed as a model for the provision of all health care. The historic exclusion of psychologists from Medicare has limited the scope of psychologists' practice and the growth of professional psychology. The recent inclusion of psychologists in Medicare improves but does not solve practice and policy issues confronting psychology. Knowledge of national health policy formulation and greater participation by psychologists in health policy are necessary to secure the scope of professional practice most psychologists expect. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Psychological consultation with primary care physicians: Obstacles and opportunities in the medical setting.

This article discusses the relationship between psychologists and primary care physicians and describes the training and practice of physicians in the areas of mental and behavioral health care. Issues affecting the relationship between psychologists and primary care physicians are then reviewed. Different models of psychological consultation are discussed, and an integrated behavioral systems model of psychological consultation is presented as a potentially effective model for consultation with primary care physicians. This model provides a framework for psychologists to function as coproviders of primary health care services. Practical strategies to enhance collaboration between psychologists and primary care physicians in private practice are discussed. The need for more research on primary care and for the inclusion of psychologists in managed care and health care reform are also highlighted. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Psychology and health care.

Recent advances in health care psychology are noted, especially those involving the conceptualization and treatment of lifestyle and chronic health problems. The contributions to health care psychology of community psychology, brief psychological treatments, behavioral medicine, and health psychology are outlined. The central task of both organized psychology and individual psychologists is to create an underlying structure of clear boundaries and standards for clinical practice and training in health care psychology. Initially, this task should involve an inventory of Canadian psychologists currently providing health care services and the nature and amount of those services. Subsequently, a need exists for the profession to examine and create guidelines in psychological service delivery, professional role models, training, and scientific methods pertaining to general health care. (French abstract) (27 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2011 APA, all rights reserved)     

Physician domination in the health care industry: The pursuit of antitrust redress.

Argues that the exclusion of qualified practitioners from the medical staffs of hospitals and the exclusion of psychological services from federal and commercial health care programs threaten the independent and autonomous practice of psychology in any national health insurance program. If psychological services are to be made available to consumers through such a program, psychologists must act now to preserve their status as independent professionals. (17 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Crossing the Quality Chasm in Behavioral Health Care: The Role of Evidence-Based Practice.

The concept of evidence-based practice (EBP) is one receiving increasing attention from providers, managers, payers, and regulators of care, yet practical guidelines for professional psychologists who may be interested in incorporating EBPs into their own work settings are not available. The author explores the pragmatics of EBP adoption within the broad context of quality problems in American health care, particularly as described in a heralded 2001 publication by the Institute of Medicine. Concrete suggestions are offered to help practitioners locate EBP resources for specific clinical problems, use an evidence hierarchy to infer "best practices," address the science-to-service management challenge, and generate outcomes data and feedback loops to continuously improve clinical effectiveness. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Comparison of public/private health care insurance parameters for independent psychological practice.

Managed care cost-cutting strategies are more prevalent in the private (employer provided) than public (Medicare/Medicaid) health care sectors. The main organizational managed care strategy pertaining to the independent practice of psychology has been the separation of the administration of mental from medical health care though behavioral health carve-outs. These organizations typically offer lower reimbursement rates and have greater preauthorization requirements than non-managed care public plans for the same psychological service. Dispute resolution in the private sector involves lawsuits and state consumer protection programs while public plans utilize internal review and are subject to investigations of provider billing fraud and abuse. Behavioral health carve-outs have reduced mental health care utilization rates with unknown effects upon outcome. There is some evidence that psychologists have chosen to limit practice within the private sector, but national data on the overall effect is lacking. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Clinical psychology in general hospital settings: Issues in interprofessional relationships.

We suggest that the involvement of clinical psychologists in health care teams may not necessarily improve health care. The position of clinical psychology with regard to medical theory and practice is examined. Then issues arising from multidisciplinary teamwork, with particular emphasis on consultation–liaison work, are discussed. We conclude that professional power structures in hospital settings have a profound influence on clinical psychological practice and that these issues need to be explicitly addressed before health care can benefit from the expertise of clinical psychologists. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Public policy and the provision of psychological services to older adults.

Public policy shapes who delivers health care, how care is delivered, and how much providers are paid. The impact of public policy will become even more important to psychologists who serve older adults as 76 million members of the so called “baby boom” generation enter their later years. Armed with basic public policy facts, psychologists can better maneuver the systems created by public policy and even change policy. This article reviews how Medicare works since it is the primary payer of mental health services for older adults. The article then turns to the question of how many health care professionals (including psychologists) will be required to meet the needs of a rapidly growing older population and concurrent challenges of training and building that work force. Finally, different policy visions for a better mental health care system for older adults are summarized since they may be roadmaps to what the future of mental health care will look like. The article closes with practical recommendations on how psychologists can influence mental health and aging public policy. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

JCAH standards for accreditation of community mental health service programs: Implications for the practice of psychology.

The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Hospitals (JCAH) has recently developed standards for the accreditation of community mental health centers (CMHCs). A review of these standards and the Balanced Service System reveals little that could be considered restrictive of the practice of psychology in CMHC settings. Unlike JCAH accreditation of hospitals and psychiatric facilities, the CMHC standards do not endorse the view that patient care be the ultimate responsibility of the physician. Although the standards were developed with no formal involvement from organizations representing psychologists, they do reflect contemporary psychological thought in the area of effective delivery of mental health services. Given the heavy consumer orientation and accountability focus emphasized in the standards, the present article maintains that JCAH accreditation could be an appropriate criterion for CMHC eligibility for national health insurance reimbursement. (25 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Psychology and primary health care for children.

There is an emerging consensus among those responsible for primary health care to children that such care should not only include medical concerns but also should assist parents with common problems of development and behavior. Psychologists are increasingly included among the personnel of medical groups that provide primary care to children. A model for this relatively new type of practice is described. Such pediatric primary-care settings also offer new research opportunities for psychologists. An important public policy issue concerns how comprehensive primary health care, including psychological services, can be made accessible to all children, and how research to evaluate such services and improve their efficacy can be encouraged. (16 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)