Response of Laterally Loaded Large-Diameter Bored Pile Groups

This paper presents results of full-scale lateral load tests of one single pile and three pile groups in Hong Kong. The test piles, which are embedded in superficial deposits and decomposed rocks, are 1.5 m in diameter and approximately 30 m long. The large-diameter bored pile groups consist of one two-pile group at 6 D (D = pile diameter) spacing and one two-pile and one three-pile group at 3 D spacing. This paper aims to investigate the nonlinear response of laterally loaded large-diameter bored pile groups and to study design parameters for large-diameter bored piles associated with the p-y method using a 3 D finite-element program, FLPIER. Predictions using soil parameters based on published correlations and back-analysis of the single-pile load test are compared. It is found that a simple hyperbolic representation of load-deflection curves provides an objective means to determine ultimate lateral load capacity, which is comparable with the calculated values based on Broms' theory. Lateral deflections of bored pile groups predicted using the values of the constant of horizontal subgrade reaction, suggested by Elson and obtained from back-analysis of the single pile load test, are generally in good agreement with the measurements, especially at low loads.     

Load Deformation Analysis of Bored Piles in Residual Weathered Formation

The current design practice of single bored piles in residual weathered formations is based mainly on stability consideration against shear failure, and pile deformation analysis is rarely carried out. However, the acceptance criteria of single piles during pile load tests during construction is based mainly on the permissible settlement criteria as specified in the specifications∕codes. In this study, a reliable method of predicting the load deformation and load distribution curves is proposed for bored piles in a residual weathered formation (Kenny Hill Formation) in Kuala Lumpur based on: (1) considerations of the weathering profiles and the engineering characteristics of this formation; (2) field performance data of fully instrumented bored pile load tests; and (3) load transfer design characteristics of the load deformation behavior. In this deformation analysis, the pile installation methods and the nonlinear behavior of the pile material are incorporated. The proposed load deformation analysis was carried out on both the instrumented and noninstrumented piles, producing good results. Therefore, this proposed method can be used to predict the load deformation characteristics of single bored piles in weathered formation during the design stage.     

Pile Spacing Effects on Lateral Pile Group Behavior: Analysis

Using the results from three full-scale lateral pile group load tests in stiff clay with spacing ranging from 3.3 to 5.65, computer analyses were performed to back-calculate p multipliers. The p multipliers, which account for reduced resistance due to pile–soil–pile interaction, increased as pile spacing increased from 3.3 to 5.65 diameters. Extrapolation of the test results suggests that group reduction effects can be neglected for spacings greater than about 6.5 for leading row piles and 7–8 diameters for trailing row piles. Based on analysis of the full-scale test results, pile behavior can be grouped into three general categories, namely: (1) first or front row piles; (2) second row piles; and (3) third and higher row piles. p multiplier versus normalized pile spacing curves were developed for each category. The proposed curves yield p multipliers which are higher than those previously recommended by AASHTO in 2000, the US Army in 1993, and the US Navy in 1982 based on limited test data, but lower values than those proposed by Reese et al. in 1996 and Reese and Van Impe in 2001. The response (load versus deflection, maximum moment versus load, and bending moment versus depth) for each row of the pile groups computed using GROUP and Florida Pier generally correlated very well with measurements from the full-scale tests when the p multipliers developed from this test program were employed.     

Pile Spacing Effects on Lateral Pile Group Behavior: Load Tests

To investigate group interaction effects as a function of pile spacing, full-scale cyclic lateral load tests were performed on pile groups in stiff clay spaced at 3.3, 4.4, and 5.65 pile diameters in the direction of loading with as many as five rows of piles. Group interaction effects decreased considerably as pile spacing increased from 3.3 to 5.65D. Lateral resistance was a function of row location in the group, rather than location within a row. For a given deflection, the leading (first) row piles carried the greatest load, while the second and third row piles carried successively smaller loads. Fourth and fifth row piles carried about the same load as the third row piles. For a given load, the maximum bending moments in the trailing row piles were greater than those in the lead row, but these effects decreased as spacing increased. Cyclic loading reduced the peak load by about 15% after 15 cycles; however, distribution of load within the pile group was essentially the same as at the peak load. Gaps significantly reduced resistance for small deflections.     

Group Interaction Effects on Laterally Loaded Piles in Clay

This paper presents the results of static lateral load tests carried out on 1×2, 2×2, 1×4, and 3×3 model pile groups embedded in soft clay. Tests were carried out on piles with length to diameter ratios of 15, 30, and 40 and three to nine pile diameter spacing. The effects of pile spacing, number of piles, embedment length, and configuration on pile-group interaction were investigated. Group efficiency, critical spacing, and p multipliers were evaluated from the experimental study. The experimental results have been compared with those obtained from the program GROUP. It has been found that the lateral capacity of piles in 3×3 group at three diameter spacing is about 40% less than that of the single pile. Group interaction causes 20% increase in the maximum bending moment in piles of the groups with three diameter spacing in comparison to the single pile. Results indicate substantial difference in p multipliers of the corresponding rows of the linear and square pile groups. The predicted field group behavior is in good agreement with the actual field test results reported in the literature.     

Centrifuge Modeling of Large-Diameter Bored Pile Groups with Defects

In this research, centrifuge model pile-load tests were carried out to failure to investigate the behavior of large-diameter bored pile groups with defects. The model piles represented cast-in-place concrete piles 2.0?m in diameter and 15?m in length. Two series of static loading tests were performed. The first series of tests simulated the performance of a pile founded on rock and a pile with a soft toe. The second series of tests simulated the performance of three 2×2 pile groups: One reference group without defects, one group containing soft toes, and one group with two shorter piles not founded on rock. The presence of soft toes and shorter piles in the defective pile groups considerably reduced the pile group stiffness and capacity. As the defective piles were less stiff than the piles without defects, the settlements of the individual piles in the two defective pile groups were different. As a result, the applied load was largely shared by the piles without defects, and the defective pile groups tilted significantly. The rotation of the defective pile groups caused large bending moments to develop in the group piles and the pile caps. When the applied load was large, bending failure mechanisms were induced even though the applied load was vertical and concentric. The test results confirm findings from numerical analyses in the literature.     

Behavior of Axially Loaded Pile Groups Driven in Clayey Silt

This paper presents a case history describing measurements made during the installation and load testing of groups of five, closely spaced, precast concrete piles in a soft clay-silt. The test results extend the presently limited set of reported high-quality data for pile groups at field scale and allow assessment of the reliability of existing numerical and analytical predictive approaches. Full scale maintained compression and tension load tests on groups as well as tests on single (reference) piles and an individual test on a pile within a pile group enable the effects of multiple pile installations and interaction between piles under load to be assessed. The results are compared with existing simple methods of pile group analysis and with other case histories reporting results on small pile groups. A simple expression to evaluate pile group stiffness efficiency is proposed.     

Reliability of Axially Loaded Driven Pile Groups

A method was presented to evaluate the reliability of axially loaded pile groups designed using the traditional concept of group efficiency along the lines of load and resistance factor design. Group effects and system effects were identified as the major causes that led to a significantly greater observed reliability of pile foundations than calculated reliability of single piles. Statistical analyses were conducted to evaluate these effects based on observed pile performance. A database of pile group load tests was collected and interpreted for this purpose. Subsequently, the reliability of pile groups associated with the allowable stress design practice was calculated using the suggested method. The calculated probability of failure of pile groups was found to be one to four orders of magnitude smaller than that of single piles, depending on the significance of group effects and system effects. Finally, values of the target reliability index βTS for single piles required to achieve a specified target reliability of pile group foundations were calculated for several design methods. Due to group effects and system effects, the values of βTS should be different for single piles, a pile group, and a pile system of several groups.     

Settlement Ratio of Pile Groups in Sandy Soils from Field Load Tests

This note studies settlement ratio, Rs, of pile groups in sandy soils, defined as the ratio of the settlement of a pile group to that of a single pile at the same average load per pile. 31 cases of field pile-group load tests and the corresponding field single-pile load tests were collected for this study. More than one-half of the cases consist of 3-diameter spaced, 9-pile groups. Based on the field test data, statistical analyses of Rs at different load levels were conducted for pile groups with cap-ground contact (PGCs) and pile groups with freestanding caps (PGFs), respectively. The mean of Rs decreases with the load level for both PGCs and PGFs, whereas the coefficient of variation of Rs increases with the load level. The influence of cap-ground contact on Rs does not appear to be significant based on a comparison of the mean Rs values of these PGCs and PGFs. In addition, a comparative study on Rs and group resistance ratio Rr, which is defined as the ratio of the average resistance of a pile in a group to that of a single pile at the same settlement, was conducted to clarify possible misunderstanding between Rs and pile group efficiency factor η for driven pile groups in sandy soils. The value of Rs compares settlement at the working load and is often larger than unity. The value of η compares failure loads, which occur at different settlements for pile groups and their respective single piles. η is usually larger than unity due to soil densification and additional contributions from the cap-ground contact for PGCs.     

Characteristics of Bored Piles Installed Through Jet Grout Layer

When bored piles are installed through a jet grout layer, significant interaction may take place between the piles and the jet grout. Field load tests have indicated that significant enhancement of the pile shaft capacity and axial stiffness was possible for both compression and tension piles. The influence of the jet grout layer was more pronounced for piles under compression loading compared with uplift loading. The effectiveness of the jet grout in transmitting load via shearing action was dependent on the thickness of the grouted zone, the strength of the interlocks between individual jet grout columns forming the grout slab, as well as the interface bond between the pile shafts and the grout. No apparent adverse effect on the performance of permanent foundations was envisaged as a result of the presence of the jet grout layer. However, interpretation of pile behavior from load tests was complicated by the interaction between the test pile and jet grout, resulting in overprediction of pile capacity and axial stiffness. The significance of the interaction has to be carefully evaluated so that a correct interpretation of the true pile capacity and axial stiffness can be made.     

Development of Downdrag on Piles and Pile Groups in Consolidating Soil

Development of pile settlement (downdrag) of piles constructed in consolidating soil may lead to serious pile foundation design problems. The investigation of downdrag has attracted far less attention than the study of dragload over the years. In this paper, several series of two-dimensional axisymmetric and three-dimensional numerical parametric analyses were conducted to study the behavior of single piles and piles in 3×3 and 5×5 pile groups in consolidating soil. Both elastic no-slip and elasto-plastic slip at the pile–soil interface were considered. For a single pile, the downdrag computed from the no-slip elastic analysis and from the analytical elastic solution was about 8–14 times larger than that computed from the elasto-plastic slip analysis. The softer the consolidating clay, the greater the difference between the no-slip elastic and the elasto-plastic slip analyses. For the 5×5 pile group at 2.5 diameter spacing, the maximum downdrag of the center, inner, and corner piles was, respectively, 63, 68, and 79% of the maximum downdrag of the single pile. The reduction of downdrag inside the pile group is attributed to the shielding effects on the inner piles by the outer piles. The relative reduction in downdrag (Wr) in the 5×5 pile group increases with an increase in the relative bearing stiffness ratio (Eb/Ec), depending on the pile location in the group. Compared with the relative reduction in dragload (Pr), Wr at the corner pile is less affected by the group interaction for a given surcharge load. This suggests that the use of sacrificing piles outside the pile group will be more effective on Pr than on Wr. Based on the three cases studied, the larger the number of piles in a group, the greater the shielding effects on Wr. Relatively speaking, Wr is more sensitive to the total number of piles than to the pile spacing within a pile group.     

Effects of Tip Location and Shielding on Piles in Consolidating Ground

Pile foundations located within consolidating ground are commonly subjected to negative skin friction (NSF) and failures of pile foundations related to dragload (compressive force) and downdrag (pile settlement) have been reported in the literature. This paper reports the results of four centrifuge model tests, which were undertaken to achieve two objectives: first, to investigate the response of a single pile subjected to NSF with different pile tip location with respect to the end-bearing stratum layer; and second, to study the behavior of floating piles subjected to NSF with and without shielding by sacrificing piles. In addition, three-dimensional numerical analyses of the centrifuge model tests were carried out with elastoplastic slip considered at the pile-soil interface. The measured maximum β value at unprotected single end-bearing and floating pile was similar and slightly smaller than 0.3. On the contrary, smaller β values of 0.1 and 0.2 were mobilized at the shielded center piles for pile spacings of 5.0 d and 6.0 d, respectively. The measured maximum dragload of the center pile in the group at 5.0 d and 6.0 d spacing was only 53% and 75% of the measured maximum dragload of an isolated single pile, respectively. Correspondingly, the measured downdrag of the center pile was reduced to about 57% and 80% of the isolated single pile. Based on the numerical analyses, it is revealed that sacrificing piles “hang up” the soil between the piles in the group and, thus, the vertical effective stress in the soil so reduced, as is the horizontal effective stress acting on the center pile. This “hang-up” effect reduces with an increase in pile spacing. For a given pile spacing, shielding effect on dragload is larger than that on downdrag.     

Centrifuge Model Study of Laterally Loaded Pile Groups in Clay

A series of centrifuge model tests has been conducted to examine the behavior of laterally loaded pile groups in normally consolidated and overconsolidated kaolin clay. The pile groups have a symmetrical plan layout consisting of 2, 2×2, 2×3, 3×3, and 4×4 piles with a center-to-center spacing of three or five times the pile width. The piles are connected by a solid aluminum pile cap placed just above the ground level. The pile load test results are expressed in terms of lateral load–pile head displacement response of the pile group, load experienced by individual piles in the group, and bending moment profile along individual pile shafts. It is established that the pile group efficiency reduces significantly with increasing number of piles in a group. The tests also reveal the shadowing effect phenomenon in which the front piles experience larger load and bending moment than that of the trailing piles. The shadowing effect is most significant for the lead row piles and considerably less significant for subsequent rows of trailing piles. The approach adopted by many researchers of taking the average performance of piles in the same row is found to be inappropriate for the middle rows, of piles for large pile groups as the outer piles in the row carry significantly more load and experience considerably higher bending moment than those of the inner piles.     

Effects of Construction on Laterally Loaded Pile Groups

Full-scale lateral load tests on a group of bored and a group of driven precast piles were carried out as part of a research project for the proposed high-speed rail system in Taiwan. Standard penetration tests, cone penetration tests (CPT), and Marchetti Dilatometer tests (DMT) were performed before the pile installation. The CPT and DMT were also conducted after pile installation. Numerical analyses of the laterally loaded piles were conducted using p-y curves derived from preconstruction and postconstruction DMT and by applying the concept of p multipliers. Comparisons between preconstruction and postconstruction CPT and DMT data and evaluation of the results of computations show that the installation of bored piles softened the surrounding soil, whereas the driven piles caused a densifying effect.     

Construction Effect on Load Transfer along Bored Piles

The load transfer behavior along bored piles is affected by details of pile construction particularly those imposing stress and moisture changes to the surrounding soils. An investigation involving moisture migration tests, in situ horizontal stress measurements, and borehole shear and pressuremeter tests shows clear effects of construction that lead to subsequent changes in soil properties. The construction of bored piles in Singapore and the region often involves casting of concrete either in unsupported “dry” boreholes or in “wet” boreholes filled with water. It is necessary to differentiate these two extreme construction conditions in bored pile design. Based on triaxial compression and pressuremeter tests on the residual soil of the Jurong Formation in Singapore, the variation of soil modulus with shear strain can be described by a hyperbolic function. A procedure is recommended for assessing the combined effect of stress relief and soaking on soil modulus by introducing a modulus reduction factor. Modulus degradation curves from pressuremeter tests with the borehole conditions properly simulated are found capable of producing load transfer curves that are comparable to those deduced in the field.     

Simplified Lateral Load Analyses of Fixed-Head Piles and Pile Groups

The characteristic load method (CLM) can be used to estimate lateral deflections and maximum bending moments in single fixed-head piles under lateral load. However, this approach is limited to cases where the lateral load on the pile top is applied at the ground surface. When the pile top is embedded, as in most piles that are capped, the additional embedment results in an increased lateral resistance. A simple approach to account for embedment effects in the CLM is presented for single fixed-head piles. In practice, fixed-head piles are more typically used in groups where the response of an individual pile can be influenced through the adjacent soil by the response of other nearby piles. This pile–soil–pile interaction results in larger deflections and moments in pile groups for the same load per pile compared to single piles. A simplified procedure to estimate group deflections and moments was also developed based on the p-multiplier approach. Group amplification factors are introduced to amplify the single pile deflection and bending moment to reflect pile–soil–pile interaction. The resulting approach lends itself well to simple spreadsheet computations and provides good agreement with other generally accepted analytical tools and with values measured in published lateral load tests on groups of fixed-head piles.     

Lateral Resistance of Single Pile Located Near Geosynthetic Reinforced Slope

An extensive program of laboratory tests was carried out to study the effect of reinforcing an earth slope on the lateral behavior of a single vertical pile located near the slope. Layers of geogrid were used to reinforce a sandy slope of 1 (V):1.5 (H) made with sands of three different unit weights representing dense, medium dense, and loose relative densities. Several configurations of geogrid reinforcement with different numbers of layers, vertical spacing, and length were investigated. The experimental program also included studies of the location of pile relative to the slope crest, relative density of sand, and embedment length of pile. The results indicate that stabilizing a soil slope has a significant benefit of improving the lateral load resistance of a vertical pile. The improvement in pile lateral load was found to be strongly dependent on the number of geogrid layers, layer size, and relative density of the sand. It was also found that soil reinforcement is more effective for piles located closer to the slope crest. Based on test results, critical values are discussed and recommended.     

New Failure Load Criterion for Large Diameter Bored Piles in Weathered Geomaterials

In the literature, various “failure criteria” or methods of estimating the failure load in pile loading tests have been proposed. The criteria, based on varying assumptions, were intended for different methods of pile testing and were verified on tests of a variety of pile types and sizes. Most of the criteria were not developed for slow maintained loading tests of large-diameter (greater than 0.6 m) and long bored piles. Piles of this kind have considerable resistance, and it is often impractical to reach failure load as defined by the various criteria. In this paper, a total of 38 large-diameter bored piles (drilled shafts) that were tested, ranging from 0.6 to 1.8 m in diameter, varying from 12 to 66 m in depth, and founded in weathered geomaterials (rocks and saprolites), are critically reviewed and studied. Among them, a selection of seven pile load tests is examined in detail by using different existing failure criteria and specifications. The tests were chosen for their high degree of mobilization of pile capacity and the availability of reliable load-movement relationships. Specific aspects of pile behavior, such as the mobilization of toe resistance and shaft shortening, are also investigated using 31 loading tests to develop a new failure load criterion. The writers were heavily involved with the construction, testing, and analysis of 15 of the 38 piles. From the results of the study, a new nonsubjective, semiempirical method is proposed for estimating the approximate interpreted failure loads for piles founded in weathered geomaterials. The method is based on a moderately conservative estimation of the movement required to mobilize toe resistance and incorporates observations of shaft shortening from pile loading tests. Generally, the new method may allow more effective and consistent designs for large-diameter bored piles in weathered geomaterials.     

Integrity Problem of Large-Diameter Bored Piles

Bleeding is known to occur in bored piles (drilled pier). The generally accepted view is that bleeding in piles is confined to the upper part of the pile only. Under certain conditions during bleeding, channeling may happen. Practising engineers believed that the associated problems with bleeding and channeling in bored piles can be overcome by overcasting the piles. A case study of extensive integrity tests consisting of cross-hole sonic logging tests and dynamic load tests on bore piles, as well as continuous corings from top to bottom of the piles carried out, revealed that some bored piles have channeling of concrete at various depths. Most of them were larger diameter piles. The finding that bleeding and channeling are not confined to the upper part of the pile is contrary to the generally accepted view. This paper attempts to develop a theory for the bleeding and channeling of concrete to explain the mechanics of the occurrence of channeling in bored piles. The proposed theory is verified by the close correlation of the predictions of the theory with field observations of the case study. Based on the proposed theory, recommendation with regards to the quality of concrete will be made to avoid the occurrence of channeling of concrete in large-diameter bored piles. The implications on the structural performance pertaining to axial capacity, compressibility and durability of bored piles with channels will be investigated.     

Behavior of Slender Piles Subject to Free-Field Lateral Soil Movement

Soil movements associated with slope instability induce shear forces and bending moments in stabilizing piles that vary with the buildup of passive pile resistance. For such free-field lateral soil movements, stress development along the pile element is a function of the relative displacement between the soil and the pile. To investigate the effects of relative soil-pile displacement on pile response, large-scale load tests were performed on relatively slender, drilled, composite pile elements (cementitious grout with centered steel reinforcing bar). The piles were installed through a shear box into stable soil and then loaded by lateral translation of the shear box. The load tests included two pile diameters (nominal 115 and 178?mm) and three cohesive soil types (loess, glacial till, and weathered shale). Instrumentation indicated the relative soil-pile displacements and the pile response to the loads that developed along the piles. Using the experimental results, an analysis approach was evaluated using soil p-y curves derived from laboratory undrained shear strength tests. The test piles and analyses helped characterize behavioral stages of the composite pile elements at loads up to pile section failure and also provided a unique dataset to evaluate the lateral response analysis method for its applicability to slender piles.