Information you need to succeed

METHODS: Sixty-eight patients underwent elective colon resection and intraperitoneal anastomosis with the biofragmentable anastomosis ring (BAR). RESULTS: Anastomotic dehiscence occurred in 3 patients (4.4%). Two of them had an end-to-end ileocolostomy using a 31 mm BAR. The anastomosis failure was due to ischaemic lesion of the small bowel close to the ileocolostomy, probably caused by a mismatch between the size of small bowel and that of the BAR. Another patient experienced anastomosis dehiscence probably due to a faecal impaction into the BAR. Forty-eight patients (70.5%) experienced troublesome constipation and evacuated after the sixth postoperative day. A bowel obstruction proximal to the BAR was documented in 4 cases who have been treated conservatively. CONCLUSIONS: The low rate of major complications justify the use of the BAR in elective colon surgery, but the surgeon must be aware of tedious postoperative obstructive episodes frequently encountered in this series.     

The laboratory study on biofragmentable anastomosis rings (BAR) in gastrointestinal tract reconstruction

To study and investigate the feasibility of biofragmentable anastomosis ring (BAR) for gastrointestinal (GI) tract reconstruction, we performed gastroenterostomy in 34 dogs. BAR anastomoses were performed with proper outer diameter and gape size in small bowel in 8 cases, in large bowel in 11 cases, in esophagus in 12 cases, in esophago-intestinal in 2 cases, in gastrojejunum in 1 cases. The postoperative serial X-ray examinations showed that BAR maintained good integration two weeks postoperation. The ring disintegrated into several small fragments that passed out of the body in feces from the 14th postoperative day after surgery. All of the dogs were killed on the 28th operative day and autopsied. The anastomosis site had smooth serosa and scar membrane in gross and were substituted by regenerative fibrous tissue. The specimen barim-air double contrast X-ray revealed that GI tract was coherent without leakage and stenosis. Therefor, the authors recognized that BAR can be recommended as a safe technique in GI operation.     

Secure anastomoses of the large intestine (especially with transanal drainage

The results of colonic resections were investigated in 356 patients in a retrospective analysis. Special attention was directed to the effectiveness of a transrectal tube, leading to decompression of the anastomosis for the first five days. Under elective conditions, the overall complication-rate was 12.7%. In emergency cases, these complications were 51.5% (one third of these cases had a decompression-tube). The clinical relevant leakage-rate under elective conditions ranged to 1.7%. Postoperative mortality related to surgical complications turned out to be 1.5% under elective conditions. The emergency operations had a high mortality which ranged to approximately 15.2%. No patient with leakage of a colorectal anastomosis died when the transrectal decompression-tube was applied. Such a safety in anastomotic healing of colon and rectum anastomoses can otherwise only be achieved by using the protection of a diverting colostomy or ileostomy. The use of the transrectal decompression-tube also avoids stomal complications and the second operation. There is no indication for the decompression-tube in emergency operations with purulent or faecal peritonitis. In these cases a fundamentally different treatment is mandatory.     

One layer continuous anastomosis of the alimentary tract with absorbable polydioxanone suture

A prospective study using absorbable Polydioxanone (PDS) suture material in a one layer continuous technique for gastrointestinal anastomosis was conducted. There were 40 anastomoses constructed in 39 children and 61 anastomoses in 49 adults which were classified as "non-complicated anastomoses" without any clinical evidence of leakage or any other complications attributable to the anastomotic technique or to the suture materials. There were other 20 anastomoses created in 20 patients with malnutrition or those receiving chemotherapy and/or radiation or where there was tension at the anastomosis which were classified as "complicated anastomosis". Anastomotic leakage was observed in one patient (5%). The starvation period was 3.16 +/- 0.9 days compared to 3.46 +/- 1.0 days in the two layer technique "control" group. The rate of complications and the function of the GI tract in both non-complicated and complicated anastomoses after one layer continuous Polydioxanone anastomotic completion was not significantly different from those using conventional two layer anastomosis. The technique for one layer continuous suture is simple, easy and takes less time than the conventional method. This technique also theoretically provides better postoperative condition in which bowel anatomy and physiology can return to normal earlier, causing minimal tissue trauma, and less narrowing of the lumen although the evidence cannot be supported by this study. The Polydioxanone suture material is biodegraded by specific time, and hence allows normal growth of the anastomosed bowel; it is therefore suitable for both children and adults.     

Colorectal surgery using a biofragmentable anastomotic ring

To compare the efficacy of the biofragmentable anastomotic ring (Valtrac-BAR, Davis and Geck, Medical Device Division, Danbury, CT, USA) with conventional anastomotic techniques, 30 patients who underwent colorectal surgery from August 1993 to March 1995 were retrospectively studied. The use of the BAR was also compared with conventional techniques including hand-sewn sutures in 30 patients and an end-to-end anastomosis (EEA) stapler in 24 patients. There were 17 men and 13 women in the BAR group with ages ranging from 37 to 80 years, 18 men and 12 women in the hand-sewn group with ages ranging from 41 to 82 years and 14 men and 10 women in the EEA group with ages ranging from 38 to 72 years. Surgical indications included: 25 colon cancers and five rectal cancers in the BAR group; 27 colon cancers and three rectal cancers in the hand-sewn group; and six colon cancers and 18 rectal cancers in the EEA group. There was no conversion to other anastomotic methods. Most of the patients tolerated a low-residual diet from the fifth post-operative day. No clinical leakage or stricture was noted. Only seven patients were aware of the passage of BAR fragments. The mean hospital stay was 14.1 days. There were no significant differences among these techniques in the return of bowel function, the incidence of surgical complications, including anastomotic leakage, or the length of hospitalization. BAR anastomosis was more time efficient than conventional techniques. Our results confirmed that BAR was an ideal sutureless alternative for anastomosis in colorectal surgery.     

Ileorectal anastomosis: results of surgical treatment and evaluation of the intestinal function

Ileo-rectal anastomosis was performed in 30 patients. Indication for surgery was ulcerative colitis in 12, cancer of colon in 10 and megacolon in 6. Mean age of patients was 47.8 years with an even sex distribution. Ileo-rectal anastomosis was performed simultaneously with total colectomy in elective patients (n = 18) and at a second stage, following transient terminal ileostomy in emergency cases (n = 12). An overall morbidity of 26% was observed: wound infection developed in 13%, prolonged ileus in 7%, intraabdominal abscess in 3% and fistula of the anastomosis in 3%. There was no mortality. After a mean follow up of 36 months there was no instance of incontinence, average number of daily intestinal evacuations was 2.4 (somewhat higher for patients with ulcerative colitis: 2.6 vs 2.1). We conclude that ileo-rectal anastomosis is a safe procedure with adequate functional results.     

Usefulness of ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy in the diagnosis and treatment of localized prostate cancer

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of stapled anastomosis in left sided colorectal reconstructions. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: District hospital, UK. SUBJECTS: 218 Consecutive patients who underwent elective colorectal reconstructions with stapled anastomoses between July 1980 and July 1994. INTERVENTIONS: 154 Anterior resections of the rectum using single or double stapled anastomoses, 37 rejoining after Hartmann's operations, and 28 restorative proctocolectomies with formation of J pouch ileoanal anastomoses. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: There were 5/154 clinical anastomotic leaks after anterior resection of the rectum and 1/28 after stapled J pouch ileoanal anastomoses. There were no leaks after rejoining of Hartmann's. The overall clinical leak rate was therefore 3%. 11/154 tumours recurred locally after anterior resection of the rectum (7%) during a mean follow up of 18 months, and 8 (73%) developed within 2 years of operation. All but one recurrence developed after single stapled anastomosis. Dukes' staging remains the most reliable prognostic indicator of the local recurrence of the tumour. There were five postoperative deaths after anterior resection but none after Hartmann's procedure or J pouch ileoanal anastomosis, giving an overall postoperative mortality of 2.3%. CONCLUSION: The use of stapling instruments in left sided colorectal anastomosis is safe and technically easy, with a low clinical anastomotic leak rate and an acceptable rate of local recurrence after anterior resection of the rectum.     

Effects of hyaluronic acid/carboxymethylcellulose gel on bowel anastomoses in the New Zealand white rabbit

Intra-abdominal adhesions form in more than 90% of patients undergoing major abdominal surgery and can lead to significant complications. Application of a bioresorbable gel consisting of chemically modified hyaluronic acid (HA) and carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) has shown promise as a means of preventing intra-abdominal adhesions, but there have been concerns that the presence of the gel might interfere with the integrity and healing of bowel anastomoses. We tested the effects of HA/CMC gel on adhesion formation and anastomotic healing in 60 New Zealand white rabbits after transection and complete (100%) or incomplete (90%) anastomosis of the ileum. Half of the animals underwent application of HA/CMC gel and half served as control subjects. Animals were killed at 4, 7, or 14 days after surgery. Anastomotic adhesions were scored in a blinded fashion. Integrity of the anastomosis was tested by measuring bursting pressure at the anastomotic site and in an adjacent section of intact bowel. With complete anastomosis, HA/CMC gel significantly reduced adhesion formation at 7 and 14 days after surgery (P<0.05), but gel application did not inhibit adhesion formation when the anastomosis was incomplete. Anastomosed segments of bowel burst at a lower pressure than intact bowel 4 days after surgery, but bursting pressures were normal at 7 and 14 days. Burst pressures of anastomoses receiving an application of HA/CMC gel were nearly identical to control anastomoses at all three time points. HA/CMC gel did not interfere with the normal healing process of bowel anastomoses. Furthermore, HA/CMC gel decreased adhesion formation after complete anastomoses, yet it did not affect adhesion formation in the presence of anastomotic disruption.     

Intracorporeal colorectal anastomosis following laparoscopic left colon resection

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of an intracorporeal double-stapled colorectal anastomosis upon the outcome of laparoscopic left colon resection. METHODS: Fifty-four selected patients underwent elective laparoscopic left colon resection for benign disease. Once resection was completed, a 33-mm suprapubic port allowed insertion of the anvil of a circular stapler into the colon, which was closed by a handsewn purse-string suture using the T-needle technique. The circular stapler was passed transanally to perform a double-stapled anastomosis. Specimens were delivered in a plastic bag via the suprapubic port. RESULTS: There were no deaths. Minor intraoperative and postoperative complications occurred in 3.7% and 9.2% of the patients, respectively. Median operating time was 125 min (range 80-210 min). Complete proximal and distal doughnuts were obtained in all patients and anastomoses were all methylene blue tight. Median hospital stay was 4 (range 3-7) days. CONCLUSIONS: Fashioning double-stapled colorectal anastomoses intracorporeally is feasable and safe.     

Endoscopic treatment of postoperative hemorrhage from a stapled colorectal anastomosis

We present the sixth reported case of endoscopic electrocoagulation to successfully treat postoperative hemorrhage from a stapled colorectal anastomosis. A literature review revealed 17 patients with postoperative hemorrhage from a combined total of 775 patients (1.8 per cent) after stapled colorectal anastomosis requiring blood transfusion and/or emergency surgery. Twelve of the 17 cases involved a circular stapler (71 per cent) used during an anastomosis to the rectum (69 per cent). Nonoperative therapy was successful in 14 of the 17 patients (82 per cent), using endoscopic electrocoagulation in six patients (43 per cent) and blood transfusion alone in another six patients (43 per cent). In follow-up there was one death (cardiac) and two anastomotic fistulas (one requiring temporary colostomy) in the nonoperative group. Both anastomotic fistulas occurred following hemorrhage from an anastomosis to the rectum using the circular stapler, one after endoscopic electrocoagulation and the second after blood transfusion alone. In summary, postoperative hemorrhage from a stapled colorectal anastomosis, although rare, is most likely to occur in a colorectal anastomosis constructed with the circular stapler. Nonoperative treatment is usually successful. Endoscopic electrocoagulation may be safely and effectively used in the early postoperative period to cease unremitting anastomotic hemorrhage.     

Breakdown of intestinal repair after laparotomy for trauma: incidence, risk factors, and strategies for prevention

BACKGROUND: Breakdown of intestinal repair and enteric leakage after trauma laparotomy can have dire consequences. Factors contributing to these failures when stratified according to location of intestinal injury and method of repair were examined. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all intestinal injuries occurring in a recent 2-year time span in adult patients surviving for more than 48 hours at a Level I trauma center. Data included Injury Severity Score, Abdominal Trauma Index score, site (stomach, duodenum, small and large intestine), and type of repair (enterorrhaphy vs. resection and anastomosis). Physiologic parameters within 48 hours of repair were assessed. Nonparametric analysis was used with significance assessed at the 95% confidence interval. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-two intestinal repairs in 171 patients were evaluated. All repairs but one were performed at the initial surgery. Eleven (5%) of these failed in 11 patients (6.4%)--four duodenum, four small bowel, and three colon--and were not recognized for an average of 15 days. Breakdown of repair occurred in patients with higher Injury Severity Scores and Abdominal Trauma Index scores (30 vs. 21 and 29 vs. 14, respectively; p < 0.001) and higher intraoperative blood and fluid administration (8.8 vs. 2.2 U and 11.5 vs. 5.1 L, respectively; p < 0.05). This was associated with longer intensive care unit and hospital stays (15.1 vs. 1.9 and 68.4 vs. 10.4 days, respectively; p < 0.001). All small bowel leaks occurred after resection and anastomosis versus enterorrhaphy (p < 0.05). All anastomotic breakdowns (four small bowel, one colon) occurred in the setting of massive blood and fluid administration versus those that did not leak (12.5 vs. 1.7 U and 12.7 vs. 5.8 L, respectively; p < 0.05). Four of 12 duodenal enterorrhaphies failed. All were associated with pancreatic injury versus none without (p < 0.05). The abdominal compartment syndrome occurred in three patients. In each case, breakdown of a small bowel anastomosis occurred. CONCLUSIONS: (1) Stomach repair and small bowel and large-bowel enterorrhaphy may be safely accomplished in any setting. (2) Associated pancreatic injury is a risk factor for disruption of duodenorrhaphy. (3) In patients with massive blood and fluid administration, delay of bowel anastomoses should be considered. (4) Disruption of small bowel anastomoses is associated with abdominal compartment syndrome.     

Model of implantation of tumor cells simulating recurrence in colonic anastomosis in mice

PURPOSE: Local recurrence after colorectal cancer surgery is usually perianastomotic. An experiment was designed to investigate whether free intraluminal cells can penetrate through a colonic anastomosis and thereby cause local recurrence. METHODS: BALB/c and C57/BL mice underwent ascending colotomy followed by watertight anastomosis. Thereafter, CT-26 murine colon carcinoma cells were injected into the cecal lumen 2 cm proximal to the anastomosis of syngeneic BALB/c mice, whereas B-16 murine melanoma cells were injected in the same fashion into C57/BL mice. Control animals without anastomosis received similar injections. Animals were killed 24 hours, 72 hours, and 30 days after surgery and were checked for tumorigenesis. RESULTS: Results of peritoneal fluid cytology were negative after 24 hours, whereas after 72 hours cancer cells were identified in the peritoneal fluid of 80 percent of mice with colotomy and anastomosis compared with 20 percent of control mice. Thirty days after surgery, 11.1 percent of the control BALB/c mice developed pericecal tumor growth, similar to the overall rate of murine melanoma in C57/BL. In mice with anastomoses, perianastomotic tumor growth was observed in 47.5 percent of BALB/c mice (P < 0.001) and was correlated with the number of injected cells. Tumor growth reached approximately 75 percent tumor take with high cell densities, whereas in C57/BL mice no difference was found between the experimental and control groups. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that free intraluminal cancer cells of colonic origin may penetrate through watertight anastomoses and implant on the anastomotic or peritoneal surface and initiate tumor growth. This anastomotic penetration is cell-mass dependent. The reported experimental model is simple, reproducible, and advantageous for studies of colonic anastomosis.     

Catastrophic complications of the cervical esophagogastric anastomosis

Recent enthusiasm for the cervical esophagogastric anastomosis has arisen because of its perceived low morbidity. Although catastrophic complications of a cervical esophagogastric anastomosis are unusual, they can and do occur, and prevention is possible if the potential for them is recognized. Among 856 patients undergoing a cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after transhiatal esophagectomy, catastrophic cervical infectious complications occurred in 11 patients (1.3%): vertebral body osteomyelitis (1), epidural abscess with neurologic impairment (2), pulmonary microabscesses from internal jugular vein abscess (1), tracheoesophagogastric anastomotic fistula (1), and major dehiscence necessitating anastomotic takedown (6). These complications became manifest from 5 to 85 days after the esophageal resection and reconstruction (mean 19 days). Leakage from a gastric suspension stitch placed in the anterior spinal ligament over the vertebral bodies resulted in a posterior gastric leak and either osteomyelitis or an epidural abscess in three patients, none of whom had evidence of extravasation on the routine barium swallow 10 days after operation. Cervical exploration for a presumed anastomotic leak led to the unexpected discovery of an abscess formed by the stomach and the adjacent wall of the internal jugular vein, which was ligated and resected. One patient without symptoms who was discharged from the hospital with a contained anastomotic leak on the postoperative barium swallow was readmitted 7 days later with a cervical tracheoesophagogastric anastomotic fistula of which he ultimately died. In 6 patients (7% of those who had anastomotic leaks) there was sufficient gastric ischemia or necrosis, or both, to necessitate takedown of the anastomosis and intrathoracic stomach, cervical esophagostomy, and insertion of a feeding tube. As a result of this experience, it is recommended that cervical gastric suspension sutures either be omitted entirely or placed in the fascia over the longus colli muscles anterior to the spine, but not directly into the prevertebral fascia overlying the vertebral bodies or cervical disks. All but minute cervical anastomotic leaks, even if apparently contained, are best drained rather than treated expectantly. Patients who remain febrile and ill after bedside drainage of a cervical esophagogastric anastomosis leak should undergo cervical reexploration in the operating room; major gastric ischemia or necrosis, or both, may warrant takedown of the anastomosis and intrathoracic stomach.     

Dilatation of the left colon with a Foley catheter: an aid to staple anastomosis

Balloon dilatation of the left colon using a Foley catheter was performed in 26 patients prior to staple anastomosis. A 28-mm stapler was then used in six (23%) patients, a 29-mm in seven (27%), a 31-mm in eleven (42%) and a 33-mm in two (8%). Two anastomoses failed (7.9%) and one patient developed local recurrence. None of the remainder developed a symptomatic stricture. Flexible sigmoidoscopy was performed on 18 patients at least 3 months after surgery, revealing that one (5.5%) had developed an asymptomatic stricture. A 28-mm stapler had been used in this case. This technique of dilating the left colon with a Foley catheter is a useful aid to staple anastomosis in large bowel surgery.     

Primary anastomosis in the treatment of acute disease of the unprepared left colon

Between June 1, 1990 and December 31, 1996, 58 consecutive patients with unprepared colons were urgently explored for nontraumatic disease with intent to proceed with primary left-sided colonic anastomosis. Unprotected anastomoses were not attempted in 15 patients. The causes of exclusion included preoperative and intraoperative shock in three patients, and three patients were on long-term high-dose steroids, four had gross fecal contamination of the peritoneal cavity, four had large pelvic abscesses, and one had ischemic colitis. All 43 patients undergoing anastomosis without protective colostomy had stapled anastomoses. Indications included complicated diverticular disease in 32 cases. There were nine cases of obstruction from colorectal carcinoma and one obstruction due to sigmoid volvulus. There was one case of perforation from pseudomembranous enterocolitis. The most common complications were: atelectasis in nine cases, wound infection in two cases, and prolonged ileus in two cases. Pelvic abscess occurred in one case. There was one wound dehiscence. There was one anastomotic dehiscence, and there was no mortality. Operative time averaged 85 minutes and hospital length of stay 9.7 days. Primary anastomosis of the unprepared left colon is safe in most urgent and emergent situations, thus avoiding the significant morbidity and cost of colostomy closure.     

Intestinal sleeve anastomosis: a comparative study with end-to-end anastomosis

This study examines the utility of a sleeve anastomosis with comparison to conventional end to end anastomosis. Thirty New Zealand white rabbits were randomized to sleeve (n = 15) or end-to-end (n = 15) small bowel anastomosis. Five rabbits of each group were sacrificed at 3 days, 7 days, and 6 weeks. Anastomoses were assessed for integrity, bursting strength, and stenosis and examined histologically. Ten control specimens of small bowel were tested for bursting pressure. Three rabbits died postoperatively (1 sleeve and 2 end-to-end). A fourth rabbit (sleeve) was sacrificed early at 3 weeks and had a total stenosis at the anastomosis. The remaining 26 rabbits were reoperated at the prescribed times. There was no evidence of infection or dehiscence in any of these rabbits. Both end-to-end and sleeve anastomoses were equivalent for bursting pressure at all times and, at 7 days and 6 weeks, were similar to controls. The stenotic index revealed no evidence of proximal dilation suggestive of obstruction in the 26 rabbits. For sleeve anastomoses the length of the projected bowel into the lumen persisted at the 6-week stage. Histologically there was good evidence of healing in both the sleeve and end-to-end anstomoses and the serosal surface of the sleeved bowel had epithelialized. Sleeve anastomosis has been demonstrated to heal well and to be as strong as conventional end-to-end anastomosis. Further studies are warranted to determine its role in intestinal anastomosis and potential as a valve.     

Comparison of the modified vest and the direct anastomosis for radical retropubic prostatectomy

OBJECTIVES: This retrospective study was undertaken to compare the efficacy of the Vest and direct vesicourethral anastomosis for radical prostatectomy. METHODS: Five hundred six patients who underwent consecutive radical prostatectomies at our institution were analyzed. Two hundred fifty-nine patients underwent vesicourethral anastomosis using the Vest technique and 247 underwent a direct suture anastomosis. The groups were analyzed relative to time until healing, the occurrence of anastomotic strictures, and the continence rate 1 year after surgery. RESULTS: Approximately twice as many patients who underwent the Vest procedure experienced delayed healing and 8.5% developed anastomotic strictures compared with 1.2% of the direct anastomosis group. The Vest group experienced slightly better urinary continence 1 year postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: The Vest procedure is a reasonable alternative to direct anastomosis for radical prostatectomy and provides similar results. We suggest specific circumstances when the Vest anastomosis may be particularly useful.     

Bio-fragmentable anastomosis ring in urological surgery involving the gastrointestinal tract: early experience and a historical review of mechanical intestinal anastomosis

We present our experience with use of a bio-fragmentable mechanical device for intestinal anastomosis in 14 patients. No anastomotic leakage occurred in our patients. The technique was easy to learn and shortened the operating time by at least 30 minutes. Our impression is that during time-consuming extensive onco-urological procedures involving the gastrointestinal tract, the use of such a device allows for a shorter operative time to the benefit of the patient and surgeon.     

Transformations of ileo-rectal anastomosis into ileo-anal anastomosis in hemorrhagic rectocolitis. Indications and results

In order to precise the indications and results of this procedure, we assessed 11 cases of transformation of ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) to ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) in ulcerative colitis (UC). These 5 men and 6 women had undergone IRA at a mean age of 31 years, 33 months after the diagnosis of UC (range 3-120). Four of these IRA, excluded by an ileostomy, had never been in function: the cause was severe persistent proctitis in 2 cases and anastomotic leakage and peritonitis in 2 cases. The other 7 IRA had been in function during a mean period of 25 months (range 6-45) and were reoperated because of anal sepsis (1 case), low rectal stenosis (1 case), disabling proctitis (4 cases) and rectal dysplasia (1 case). No patient had specific pathologic signs of Crohn's disease. The 11 IPAA were complicated by pelvic sepsis in 3 cases; surgical drainage succeeded in 1 case, but the 2 others needed pouch excision and terminal ileostomy. The diagnosis of Crohn's disease was eventually made in these 2 patients. The 9 patients with functioning IPAA, at a mean follow-up of 40 months (range 12-60), had 5.2 stools per 24 h (range 2-12), 5 patients had no nocturnal stooling, and 6 had a perfect continence. One patient had disabling chronic pouchitis. In conclusion, proctectomy with IPAA is always feasible when a previous IRA for UC had failed or offers poor results, but should be rejected in case of anal involvement, as that may suggest Crohn's disease. This procedure is followed by similar functional results than after primary IPAA.