Comparative studies of augmentation in combined cycle power plants

The attractive features of a combined cycle (CC) power plant are fuel flexibility, operational flexibility, higher efficiency and low emissions. The performance of five gas turbine‐steam turbine (GT‐ST) combined cycle power plants (four natural gas based plants and one biomass based plant) have been studied and the degree of augmentation has been compared. They are (i) combined cycle with natural gas (CC‐NG), (ii) combined cycle with water injection (CC‐WI), (iii) combined cycle with steam injection (CC‐SI), (iv) combined cycle with supplementary firing (CC‐SF) and (v) combined cycle with biomass gasification (CC‐BM). The plant performance and CO₂ emissions are compared with a change in compressor pressure ratio and gas turbine inlet temperature (GTIT). The optimum pressure ratio for compressor is selected from maximum efficiency condition. The specific power, thermal efficiency and CO₂ emissions of augmented power plants are compared with the CC‐NG power plant at the individual optimized pressure ratios in place of a common pressure ratio. The results show that the optimum pressure ratio is increased with water injection, steam injection, supplementary firing and biomass gasification. The specific power is increased in all the plants with a loss in thermal efficiency and rise in CO₂ emissions compared to CC‐NG plant. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Effects of supplementary biomass firing on the performance of combined cycle power generation: A comparison between NGCC and IGCC plants

In the present work, effects of biomass supplementary firing on the performance of fossil fuel fired combined cycles have been analyzed. Both natural gas fired combined cycle (NGCC) and integrated coal gasification combined cycle (IGCC) have been considered in the study. The efficiency of the NGCC plant monotonically reduces with the increase in supplementary firing, while for the IGCC plant the maximum plant efficiency occurs at an optimum degree of supplementary firing. This difference in the nature of variation of the efficiency of two plants under the influence of supplementary firing has been critically analyzed in the paper. The ratings of different plant equipments, fuel flow rates and the emission indices of CO₂ from the plants at varying degree of supplementary firing have been evaluated for a net power output of 200 MW. The fraction of total power generated by the bottoming cycle increases with the increase in supplementary firing. However, the decrease in the ratings of gas turbines is much more than the increase in that of the steam turbines due to the low work ratio of the topping cycle. The NGCC plants require less biomass compared to the IGCC under identical condition. A critical degree of supplementary firing has been identified for the slag free operation of the biomass combustor. The performance parameters, equipment ratings and fuel flow rates for no supplementary firing and for the critical degree of supplementary biomass firing have been compared for the NGCC and IGCC plants.     

Performance analysis of a syngas-fed gas turbine considering the operating limitations of its components

As the need for clean coal technology grows, research and development efforts for integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) plants have increased worldwide. An IGCC plant couples a gas turbine with a gasification block. Various technical issues exist in designing the entire system. Among these issues, the matching between the gas turbine and the air separation unit is especially important. In particular, the operating condition of a gas turbine in an IGCC plant may be very different from that of its original design. In this study, we analyzed the impact of the use of syngas on operating conditions of the gas turbine in an IGCC plant. We evaluated the performance of a gas turbine under operating limitations in terms of compressor surge and turbine metal temperature. Although a lower degree of integration may theoretically allow higher gas turbine power output and efficiency, it causes a reduction in compressor surge margin and overheating of the turbine metal. The turbine overheating problem may be solved using several methods, such as a reduction in the firing temperature or an increase in the turbine cooling air. The latter yields a much smaller performance penalty. To achieve an acceptable margin for the compressor surge, either further reduction in the firing temperature or further increase in the coolant is required. Ventilation of some of the nitrogen generated by the air separation unit, i.e., a reduction of the nitrogen supply to the combustor, is another option. Coolant modulation yields the lowest performance penalty. Reduction of the nitrogen supply provides much greater system power output than control of the firing temperature. For nitrogen flow and firing temperature controls, there are optimal levels of integration degrees in terms of net system power output and efficiency.     

Production of power using underground coal gasification

Underground coal gasification (UCG) is a process that converts deep, un-mineable coal resources into syngas, which can then be converted into valuable end products such as electric power. This paper provides a summary of the options to combine UCG with electric power production and focuses on commercial-scale applications using a combined-cycle power plant including integration options and syngas cleanup steps. Simulation results for a UCG power plant with carbon capture are compared against the results for an equivalent Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) plant using the same feedstock. Relative capital cost savings for a UCG power plant are estimated based on published IGCC process unit costs. The UCG power plant with carbon capture is shown to provide a higher thermal efficiency, lower CO₂ intensity, and lower capital cost than an equivalent IGCC plant. Finally, the potential of UCG as a method for producing cost-effective, low-emissions electrical power from deep coal is discussed and some of the challenges and opportunities are summarized.     

Perspectives for the direct firing of biomass as a supplementary fuel in combined cycle power plants

An analysis of the performance of a gas turbine–steam turbine combined cycle with supplementary firing has been carried out. Natural gas is fired in the main combustor of the cycle, whereas biomass fuel is considered as the supplementary fuel. Although, supplementary firing is found to reduce the overall cycle efficiency, the low cost of biomass and the CO₂‐neutral attribute of its combustion reduce the specific fuel cost and specific CO₂ emission. The effects of pressure and temperature ratios of the topping cycle and main steam conditions of the bottoming cycle on the performance parameters of the combined cycle have been studied at different degrees of supplementary firing. The topping cycle temperature ratio is found to be the most critical parameter and its low value gives substantial advantages in lowering the fuel cost and CO₂ emission. Marginal advantages are also achieved at higher pressure ratio and better bottoming cycle main steam conditions. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Pre-combustion, post-combustion and oxy-combustion in thermal power plant for CO2 capture

This paper presents a summary of technical-economic studies. It allows evaluating, in the French context, the production cost of electricity derived from coal and gas power plants with the capture of CO₂, and the cost per tonne of CO₂ avoided. Three systems were studied: an Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC), a conventional combustion of Pulverized Coal (PC) and a Natural Gas Combined Cycle (NGCC). Three main methods were envisaged for the capture of CO₂: pre-combustion, post-combustion and oxy-combustion.For the IGCC, two gasification types have been studied: a current technology based on gasification of dry coal at 27 bars (Shell or GE/Texaco radiant type) integrated into a classical combined cycle providing 320 MWe, and a future technology (planned for about 2015–2020) based on gasification of a coal–water mixture (slurry) that can be compressed to 64 bars (GE/Texaco slurry type) integrated into an advanced combined cycle (type H with steam cooling of the combustion turbine blades) producing a gross power output of 1200 MWe.     

Integrated gasification and Cu-Cl cycle for trigeneration of hydrogen, steam and electricity

This paper develops and analyzes an integrated process model of an Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) and a thermochemical copper-chlorine (Cu-Cl) cycle for trigeneration of hydrogen, steam and electricity. The process model is developed with Aspen HYSYS software. By using oxygen instead of air for the gasification process, where oxygen is provided by the integrated Cu-Cl cycle, it is found that the hydrogen content of produced syngas increases by about 20%, due to improvement of the gasification combustion efficiency and reduction of syngas NO_x emissions. Moreover, about 60% of external heat required for the integrated Cu-Cl cycle can be provided by the IGCC plant, with minor modifications of the steam cycle, and a slight decrease of IGCC overall efficiency. Integration of gasification and thermochemical hydrogen production can provide significant improvements in the overall hydrogen, steam and electricity output, when compared against the processes each operating separately and independently of each other.     

Distributed power generation via gasification of biomass and municipal solid waste: A review

The access to electricity has increased worldwide, growing from 60 million additional consumers per year in 2000–2012 to 100 million per year in 2012–2016. Despite this growth, approximately 675 million people will still lack access to electricity in 2030, indicating that electricity demand will continue to increase. Unfortunately, traditional large fossil power technologies based on coal, oil and natural gas lead to a major concern in tackling worldwide carbon dioxide emissions, and nuclear power remains unpopular due to public safety concerns. Distributed power generation utilizing CO₂-neutral sources, such as gasification of biomass and municipal solid wastes (MSW), can play an important role in meeting the world energy demand in a sustainable way. This review focuses on the recent technology developments on seven power generation technologies (i.e. internal combustion engine, gas turbine, micro gas turbine, steam turbine, Stirling engine, organic rankine cycle generator, and fuel cell) suitable for distributed power applications with capability of independent operation using syngas derived from gasification of biomass and MSW. Technology selection guidelines is discussed based on criteria, including hardware modification required, size inflexibility, sensitivity to syngas contaminants, operational uncertainty, efficiency, lifetime, fast ramp up/down capability, controls and capital cost. Major challenges facing further development and commercialization of these power generation technologies are discussed.     

Shell coal IGCCS with carbon capture: Conventional gas quench vs. innovative configurations

The Shell coal integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) based on the gas quench system is one of the most fuel flexible and energy efficient gasification processes because is dry feed and employs high temperature syngas coolers capable of rising high pressure steam. Indeed the efficiency of a Shell IGCC with the best available technologies is calculated to be 47–48%. However the system looses many percentage points of efficiency (up to 10) when introducing carbon capture. To overcome this penalty, two approaches have been proposed. In the first, the expensive syngas coolers are replaced by a “partial water quench” where the raw syngas stream is cooled and humidified via direct injection of hot water. This design is less costly, but also less efficient. The second approach retains syngas coolers but instead employs novel water–gas shift (WGS) configurations that requires substantially less steam to obtain the same degree of CO conversion to CO₂, and thus increases the overall plant efficiency. We simulate and optimize these novel configurations, provide a detailed thermodynamic and economic analysis and investigate how these innovations alter the plant’s efficiency, cost and complexity.     

Parametric techno‐economic studies of coal/biomass co‐gasification for IGCC plants with carbon capture using various coal ranks,fuel‐feeding schemes,and syngas cooling methods

Because of biomass's limited supply (as well as other issues involving its feeding and transportation), pure biomass plants tend to be small, which results in high production and capital costs (per unit power output) compared with much larger coal plants. Thus, it is more economically attractive to co‐gasify biomass with coal. Biomass can also make an existing plant carbon‐neutral or even carbon‐negative if enough carbon dioxide is captured and sequestered (CCS). As a part of a series of studies examining the thermal and economic impact of different design implementations for an integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) plant fed with blended coal and biomass, this paper focuses on investigating various parameters, including radiant cooling versus syngas quenching, dry‐fed versus slurry‐fed gasification (particularly in relation to sour‐shift and sweet‐shift carbon capture systems), oxygen‐blown versus air‐blown gasifiers, low‐rank coals versus high‐rank coals, and options for using syngas or alternative fuels in the duct burner for the heat recovery steam generator (HRSG) to achieve the desired steam turbine inlet temperature. Using the commercial software, Thermoflow^®, the case studies were performed on a simulated 250‐MW coal IGCC plant located near New Orleans, Louisiana, and the coal was co‐fed with biomass using ratios ranging from 10% to 30% by weight. Using 2011 dollars as a basis for economic analysis, the results show that syngas coolers are more efficient than quench systems (by 5.5 percentage points), but are also more expensive (by $500/kW and 0.6 cents/kW h). For the feeding system, dry‐fed is more efficient than slurry‐fed (by 2.2–2.5 points) and less expensive (by $200/kW and 0.5 cents/kW h). Sour‐shift CCS is both more efficient (by 3 percentage points) and cheaper (by $600/kW or 1.5 cents/kW h) than sweet‐shift CCS. Higher‐ranked coals are more efficient than lower‐ranked coals (2.8 points without biomass, or 1.5 points with biomass) and have lower capital cost (by $600/kW without using biomass, or $400/kW with biomass). Finally, plants with biomass and low‐rank coal feedstock are both more efficient and have lower costs than those with pure coal: just 10% biomass seems to increase the efficiency by 0.7 points and reduce costs by $400/kW and 0.3 cents/kW h. However, for high‐rank coals, this trend is different: the efficiency decreases by 0.7 points, and the cost of electricity increases by 0.1 cents/kW h, but capital costs still decrease by about $160/kW. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

整体煤气化联合循环(IGCC)发电技术介绍

整体煤气化联合循环（IGCC）发电技术是煤气化和蒸汽联合循环的结合,是当今国际正在兴起的一种先进的洁净煤（CCT）发电技术,具有高效、低污染、节水、综合利用好等优点。它的原理是：煤经过气化和净化后,除去煤气中99％以上的硫化氢和接近100％的粉尘,将固体燃料转化成燃气轮机能燃用的清洁气体燃料,以驱动燃气轮机发电,再使燃气发电与蒸汽发电联合起来。     

Assessment of hydrogen and electricity co-production schemes based on gasification process with carbon capture and storage

Through gasification, a solid feedstock is partially oxidized with oxygen and steam to produce syngas which can be used for conversion into different valuable compounds (e.g. hydrogen) or to generate power in a combined cycle gas turbine (CCGT). Integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) is one of power generation technologies having the highest potential for carbon capture with low penalties in efficiency and cost.     

Boiling coal in water: Hydrogen production and power generation system with zero net CO2 emission based on coal and supercritical water gasification

Coal is the single most important fuel for power generation today. Nowadays, most coal is consumed by means of “burning coal in air” and pollutants such as NO_x, SO_x, CO₂, PM2.5 etc. are inevitably formed and mixed with excessive amount of inner gases, so the pollutant emission reduction system is complicated and the cost is high. IGCC is promising because coal is gasified before utilization. However, the coal gasifier mostly operates in gas environments, so special equipments are needed for the purification of the raw gas and CO₂ emission reduction. Coal and supercritical water gasification process is another promising way to convert coal efficiently and cleanly to H₂ and pure CO₂. The gasification process is referred to as “boiling coal in water” and pollutants containing S and N deposit as solid residual and can be discharged from the gasifier. A novel thermodynamics cycle power generation system was proposed by us in State Key Laboratory of Multiphase Flow in Power Engineering (SKLMFPE) of Xi'an jiaotong University (XJTU), which is based on coal and supercritical water gasification and multi-staged steam turbine reheated by hydrogen combustion. It is characterized by its high coal-electricity efficiency, zero net CO₂ emission and no pollutants. A series of experimental devices from quartz tube system to a pilot scale have been established to realize the complete gasification of coal in SKLMFPE. It proved the prospects of coal and supercritical water gasification process and the novel thermodynamics cycle power generation system.     

Investigation of coal gasification hydrogen and electricity co-production plant with three-reactors chemical looping process

This paper analyzes a novel process for producing hydrogen and electricity from coal, based on chemical looping combustion (CLC) and gas turbine combined cycle, allowing for intrinsic capture of carbon dioxide. The core of the process consists of a three-reactors CLC system, where iron oxide particles are circulated to: (i) oxidize syngas in the fuel reactor (FR) providing a CO₂ stream ready for sequestration after cooling and steam vapor condensation, (ii) reduce steam in the steam reactor (SR) to produce hydrogen, (iii) consume oxygen in the air reactor (AR) from air releasing heat to sustain the thermal balance of the CLC system and to generate electricity. A compacted fluidized bed, composed of two fuel reactors, is proposed here for full conversion of fuel gases in FR. The gasification CLC combined cycle plant for hydrogen and electricity cogeneration with Fe₂O₃/FeAl₂O₄ oxygen carriers was simulated using ASPEN^® PLUS software. The plant consists of a supplementary firing reactor operating up to 1350 °C and three-reactors SR at 815 °C, FR at 900 °C and AR at 1000 °C. The results show that the electricity and hydrogen efficiencies are 14.46% and 36.93%, respectively, including hydrogen compression to 60 bar, CO₂ compression to 121 bar, The CO₂ capture efficiency is 89.62% with a CO₂ emission of 238.9 g/kWh. The system has an electricity efficiency of 10.13% and a hydrogen efficiency of 41.51% without CO₂ emission when supplementary firing is not used. The plant performance is attractive because of high energy conversion efficiency and low CO₂ emission. Key parameters that affect the system performance are also discussed, including the conversion of steam to hydrogen in SR, supplementary firing temperature of the oxygen depleted air from AR, AR operation temperature, the flow of oxygen carriers, and the addition of inert support material to the oxygen carrier.     

The cost of integration of zero emission power plants—A case study for the island of Cyprus

In this work, a technical, economic and environmental analysis is carried out for the estimation of the optimal option scenario for the Cyprus's future power generation system. A range of power generation technologies integrated with carbon capture and storage (CCS) were examined as candidate options and compared with the business as usual scenario. Based on the input data and the assumptions made, the simulations indicated that the integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) technology with pre-combustion CCS integration is the least cost option for the future expansion of the power generation system. In particular, the results showed that for a natural gas price of 7.9US$/GJ the IGCC technology with pre-combustion CCS integration is the most economical choice, closely followed by the pulverized coal technology with post-combustion CCS integration. The combined cycle technology can, also, be considered as alternative competitive technology. The combined cycle technologies with pre- or post-combustion CCS integration yield more expensive electricity unit cost. In addition, a sensitivity analysis has been also carried out in order to examine the effect of the natural gas price on the optimum planning. For natural gas prices greater than 6.4US$/GJ the least cost option is the use of IGCC technology with CCS integration. It can be concluded that the Cyprus's power generation system can be shifted slowly towards the utilization of CCS technologies in favor of the existing steam power plants in order not only to lower the environmental emissions and fulfilling the recent European Union Energy Package requirements but also to reduce the associated electricity unit cost.     

Air-blown biomass gasification combined cycles (BGCC): System analysis and economic assessment

Within the carbon constrained world, biomass-based power production is expected to constitute one of the candidates for CO₂ abatement. However, within the framework of a liberalised energy market, biomass power systems must be competitive from efficiency and cost point of view for their successful commercial breakthrough. Integrated gasification combined cycles (IGCC) based on pressurised biomass gasification, coupled with economical acceptable hot gas clean-up systems, are one of the most promising options. In this study, a technical and economic assessment is carried out of alternative power plant concepts with the aid of computer simulation tools. Various gas turbine plant sizes are considered ranging from 10 to 70 MW_e and their performance is evaluated. Apart from stand-alone power systems, the study is complemented with cases linked with a coal-fired power plant by parallel integration of a gas turbine with the existing steam cycle.     

Operation window and part-load performance study of a syngas fired gas turbine

Integrated coal gasification combined cycle (IGCC) provides a great opportunity for clean utilization of coal while maintaining the advantage of high energy efficiency brought by gas turbines. A challenging problem arising from the integration of an existing gas turbine to an IGCC system is the performance change of the gas turbine due to the shift of fuel from natural gas to synthesis gas, or syngas, mainly consisting of carbon monoxide and hydrogen. Besides the change of base-load performance, which has been extensively studied, the change of part-load performance is also of great significance for the operation of a gas turbine and an IGCC plant.In this paper, a detailed mathematical model of a syngas fired gas turbine is developed to study its part-load performance. A baseline is firstly established using the part-load performance of a natural gas fired gas turbine, then the part-load performance of the gas turbine running with different compositions of syngas is investigated and compared with the baseline. Particularly, the impacts of the variable inlet guide vane, the degree of fuel dilution, and the degree of air bleed are investigated. Results indicate that insufficient cooling of turbine blades and a reduced compressor surge margin are the major factors that constrain the part-load performance of a syngas fired gas turbine. Results also show that air bleed from the compressor can greatly improve the working condition of a syngas fired gas turbine, especially for those fired with low lower heating value syngas. The regulating strategy of a syngas fired gas turbine should also be adjusted in accordance to the changes of part-load performance, and a reduced scope of constant TAT (turbine exhaust temperature) control mode is required.     

三压再热汽水系统IGCC的设计工况和变工况性能

以三压再热式汽水系统ＩＧＣＣ（整体煤气化燃气－蒸汽联合循环）为研究对象组成了整体空分ＩＧＣＣ系统方案,建立了气化炉,净化系统,燃气轮机,空分装置,余热锅炉,汽轮机各组成部件的数学模型,对ＩＧＣＣ系统的设计工况和变工况特性进行计算,分析了煤气轮机采用不同调节规律和汽轮机采用不同运行方式时对系统变工况性能的影响并提出了合理的运行方式。     

The air membrane-ATR integrated gas turbine power cycle: A method for producing electricity with low CO2 emissions

The air membrane-auto thermal reforming (AM-ATR) gas turbine cycle combines features of the R-ATR power cycle, introduced at the University of Florence, with ceramic, air separation membranes to achieve a novel combined cycle process with fuel decarbonisation and near-zero CO₂ emissions. Within this process, the natural gas fuel is converted to H₂ and CO through the auto thermal reforming process (ATR), i.e. combined partial oxidation and steam methane reforming, within the air separation membrane reactor. In a subsequent process unit, the H₂ content of the reformed fuel is enriched by the well known CO–CO₂ shift reaction. This fuel is then sent to an amine based carbon dioxide removal unit and, finally, to two combustors: the first one is located upstream of the membrane reformer (in order to achieve the required working temperature) and the second one is downstream of the membrane to reach the desired turbine inlet temperature (TIT).The main advantage of the proposed concept over other decarbonisation processes is the coupling of the membrane and the ATR reactor. This coupling greatly reduces the mass flow of syngas with respect to the air blown ATR contained in the previously proposed R-ATR, thus lowering the size of the syngas treatment section. Furthermore, as the oxygen production is integrated at high temperatures in the power cycle, the efficiency penalty of producing oxygen is much smaller than for the traditional cryogenic oxygen separation. The main advantages over other integrated GT-membrane concepts are the lower membrane operating temperature, lower levels of required air separation at high partial pressure driving forces (leading to lower membrane surface areas) and the possibility to achieve a higher TIT with top firing without increasing CO₂ emissions. When compared to power plants with tail end CO₂ separation, the CO₂ removal process treats a gas at pressure and with a significantly higher CO₂ concentration than that of gas turbine exhausts, which allows a compact carbon dioxide removal unit with a lower energy penalty.Starting from the same basis, various configurations were considered and optimised, all of which targeted a 65 MW power output combined cycle. The efficiency level achieved is around 45% (including recompression of the separated CO₂), which is roughly 10% less than the reference GT-CC plant (without CO₂ removal). A significant part of the efficiency penalty (4.3–5.6% points) is due to the fuel reforming, whereas further penalties come from the recompression units, loss of working fluid through the expander and the steam extracted for the ATR reactor and CO₂ separation. The specific CO₂ emissions of the MCM-ATR are about 120 kg CO₂/kWh, representing 30% of the emissions without CO₂ removal. This may be reduced to 10–15% with a better design of the shift reactors and the CO₂ removal unit. Compared to other concepts with air membrane technology, such as the AZEP concept, the efficiency loss is much greater when used for fuel de-carbonisation than for previous integration options.     

Life cycle GHG assessment of fossil fuel power plants with carbon capture and storage

The evaluation of life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from power generation with carbon capture and storage (CCS) is a critical factor in energy and policy analysis. The current paper examines life cycle emissions from three types of fossil-fuel-based power plants, namely supercritical pulverized coal (super-PC), natural gas combined cycle (NGCC) and integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC), with and without CCS. Results show that, for a 90% CO₂ capture efficiency, life cycle GHG emissions are reduced by 75–84% depending on what technology is used. With GHG emissions less than 170 g/kWh, IGCC technology is found to be favorable to NGCC with CCS. Sensitivity analysis reveals that, for coal power plants, varying the CO₂ capture efficiency and the coal transport distance has a more pronounced effect on life cycle GHG emissions than changing the length of CO₂ transport pipeline. Finally, it is concluded from the current study that while the global warming potential is reduced when MEA-based CO₂ capture is employed, the increase in other air pollutants such as NO_x and NH₃ leads to higher eutrophication and acidification potentials.