Reducts of propositional theories,satisfiability relations,and generalizations of semantics of logic programs

Over the years, the stable-model semantics has gained a position of the correct (two-valued) interpretation of default negation in programs. However, for programs with aggregates (constraints), the stable-model semantics, in its broadly accepted generalization stemming from the work by Pearce, Ferraris and Lifschitz, has a competitor: the semantics proposed by Faber, Leone and Pfeifer, which seems to be essentially different. Our goal is to explain the relationship between the two semantics. Pearce, Ferraris and Lifschitz's extension of the stable-model semantics is best viewed in the setting of arbitrary propositional theories. We propose here an extension of the Faber–Leone–Pfeifer semantics, or FLP semantics, for short, to the full propositional language, which reveals both common threads and differences between the FLP and stable-model semantics. We use our characterizations of FLP-stable models to derive corresponding results on strong equivalence and on normal forms of theories under the FLP semantics. We apply a similar approach to define supported models for arbitrary propositional theories, and to study their properties.     

The basic constructive logic for a weak sense of consistency

In this paper, consistency is understood as the absence of the negation of a theorem, and not, in general, as the absence of any contradiction. We define the basic constructive logic B_Kc1 adequate to this sense of consistency in the ternary relational semantics without a set of designated points. Then we show how to define a series of logics extending B_Kc1 within the spectrum delimited by contractionless minimal intuitionistic logic. All logics defined in the paper are paraconsistent logics.     

Multi-Agent Dynamic Logics with Informational Test

This paper investigates a family of logics for reasoning about the dynamic activities and informational attitudes of agents, namely the agents' beliefs and knowledge. The logics are based on a new formalisation and semantics of the test operator of propositional dynamic logic and a representation of actions which distinguishes abstract actions from concrete actions. The new test operator, called informational test, can be used to formalise the beliefs and knowledge of particular agents as dynamic modalities. This approach is consistent with the formalisation of the agents' beliefs and knowledge as K(D)45 and S5 modalities. Properties concerning informativeness, truthfulness and preservation of beliefs are proved for a derivative of the informational test operator. It is shown that common belief and common knowledge can be expressed in the considered logics. This means, the logics are more expressive than propositional dynamic logic with an extra modality for belief or knowledge. The logics remain decidable and belong to 2EXPTIME. Versions of the considered logics express natural additional properties of beliefs or knowledge and interaction of beliefs or knowledge with actions. It is shown that a simulation of PDL can be constructed in one of these extensions.     

Informational interpretation of substructural propositional logics

This paper deals with various substructural propositional logics, in particular with substructural subsystems of Nelson's constructive propositional logics N^– and N. Doen's groupoid semantics is extended to these constructive systems and is provided with an informational interpretation in terms of information pieces and operations on information pieces.     

N-Prolog and equivalence of logic programs

The aim of this work is to develop a declarative semantics for N-Prolog with negation as failure. N-Prolog is an extension of Prolog proposed by Gabbay and Reyle (1984, 1985), which allows for occurrences of nested implications in both goals and clauses. Our starting point is an operational semantics of the language defined by means of top-down derivation trees. Negation as finite failure can be naturally introduced in this context. A goal-G may be inferred from a database if every top-down derivation of G from the database finitely fails, i.e., contains a failure node at finite height.Our purpose is to give a logical interpretation of the underlying operational semantics. In the present work (Part 1) we take into consideration only the basic problems of determining such an interpretation, so that our analysis will concentrate on the propositional case. Nevertheless we give an intuitive account of how to extend our results to a first order language. A full treatment of N-Prolog with quantifiers will be deferred to the second part of this work.Our main contribution to the logical understanding of N-Prolog is the development of a notion of modal completion for programs, or databases. N-Prolog deductions turn out to be sound and complete with respect to such completions. More exactly, we introduce a natural modal three-valued logic PK and we prove that a goal is derivable from a propositional program if and only if it is implied by the completion of the program in the logic PK. This result holds for arbitrary programs. We assume no syntactic restriction, such as stratification (Apt et al. 1988; Bonner and McCarty 1990). In particular, we allow for arbitrary recursion through negation.Our semantical analysis heavily relies on a notion of intensional equivalence for programs and goals. This notion is naturally induced by the operational semantics, and is preserved under substitution of equivalent subexpressions. Basing on this substitution property we develop a theory of normal forms of programs and goals. Every program can be effectively transformed into an equivalent program in normal form. From the simple and uniform structure of programs in normal form one may directly define the completion.     

On combinations of propositional dynamic logic and doxastic modal logics

We prove completeness and decidability results for a family of combinations of propositional dynamic logic and unimodal doxastic logics in which the modalities may interact. The kind of interactions we consider include three forms of commuting axioms, namely, axioms similar to the axiom of perfect recall and the axiom of no learning from temporal logic, and a Church–Rosser axiom. We investigate the influence of the substitution rule on the properties of these logics and propose a new semantics for the test operator to avoid unwanted side effects caused by the interaction of the classic test operator with the extra interaction axioms. This paper is a revised and extended version of Schmidt and Tishkovsky (2003).     

Elementary Definability and Completeness in General and Positive Modal Logic

The paper generalises Goldblatt's completeness proof for Lemmon–Scott formulas to various modal propositional logics without classical negation and without ex falso, up to positive modal logic, where conjunction and disjunction, andwhere necessity and possibility are respectively independent.Further the paper proves definability theorems for Lemmon–Scottformulas, which hold even in modal propositional languages without negation and without falsum. Both, the completeness theorem and the definability theoremmake use only of special constructions of relations,like relation products. No second order logic, no general frames are involved.     

Logics to formalise p-adic valued probability and their applications

Abstract

In this paper, we focus on the main results which we have developed to obtain different propositional logics for reasoning about p-adic valued probabilities. Each of these logics is a sound, complete, and decidable extension of classical propositional logic. Also, we show some applications of these logics in modelling cognitions.     

Hierarchies of modal and temporal logics with reference pointers

We introduce and study hierarchies of extensions of the propositional modal and temporal languages with pairs of new syntactic devices: point of reference-reference pointer which enable semantic references to be made within a formula. We propose three different but equivalent semantics for the extended languages, discuss and compare their expressiveness. The languages with reference pointers are shown to have great expressive power (especially when their frugal syntax is taken into account), perspicuous semantics, and simple deductive systems. For instance, Kamp's and Stavi's temporal operators, as well as nominals (names, clock variables), are definable in them. Universal validity in these languages is proved undecidable. The basic modal and temporal logics with reference pointers are uniformly axiomatized and a strong completeness theorem is proved for them and extended to some classes of their extensions.     

Fibred semantics for feature-based grammar logic

This paper gives a simple method for providing categorial brands of feature-based unification grammars with a model-theoretic semantics. The key idea is to apply the paradigm of fibred semantics (or layered logics, see Gabbay (1990)) in order to combine the two components of a feature-based grammar logic. We demonstrate the method for the augmentation of Lambek categorial grammar with Kasper/Rounds-style feature logic. These are combined by replacing (or annotating) atomic formulas of the first logic, i.e. the basic syntactic types, by formulas of the second. Modelling such a combined logic is less trivial than one might expect. The direct application of the fibred semantics method where a combined atomic formula like np (num: sg & pers: 3rd) denotes those strings which have the indicated property and the categorial operators denote the usual left- and right-residuals of these string sets, does not match the intuitive, unification-based proof theory. Unification implements a global bookkeeping with respect to a proof whereas the direct fibring method restricts its view to the atoms of the grammar logic. The solution is to interpret the (embedded) feature terms as global feature constraints while maintaining the same kind of fibred structures. For this adjusted semantics, the anticipated proof system is sound and complete.     

A Branching Time Temporal Framework for Quantitative Reasoning

Temporal logics such as Computation Tree Logic (CTL) and Linear Temporal Logic (LTL) have become popular for specifying temporal properties over a wide variety of planning and verification problems. In this paper we work towards building a generalized framework for automated reasoning based on temporal logics. We present a powerful extension of CTL with first-order quantification over the set of reachable states for reasoning about extremal properties of weighted labeled transition systems in general. The proposed logic, which we call Weighted Quantified Computation Tree Logic (WQCTL), captures the essential elements common to the domain of planning and verification problems and can thereby be used as an effective specification language in both domains. We show that in spite of the rich, expressive power of the logic, we are able to evaluate WQCTL formulas in time polynomial in the size of the state space times the length of the formula. Wepresent experimental results on the WQCTL verifier.     

On the formal semantics of IF-like logics

In classical logics, the meaning of a formula is invariant with respect to the renaming of bound variables. This property, normally taken for granted, has been shown not to hold in the case of Independence Friendly (IF) logics. In this paper we argue that this is not an inherent characteristic of these logics but a defect in the way in which the compositional semantics given by Hodges for the regular fragment was generalized to arbitrary formulas. We fix this by proposing an alternative formalization, based on a variation of the classical notion of valuation. Basic metatheoretical results are proven. We present these results for Hodges' slash logic (from which these can be easily transferred to other IF-like logics) and we also consider the flattening operator, for which we give novel game-theoretical semantics.     

Reducing signed propositional formulas

 New strategies of reduction for finite-valued propositional logics are introduced in the framework of the TAS¹ methodology developed by the authors [1]. A new data structure, the Δ^-sets, is introduced to store information about the formula being analysed, and its usefulness is shown by developing efficient strategies to decrease the size of signed propositional formulas, viz., new criteria to detect the validity or unsatisfiability of subformulas, and a strong generalisation of the pure literal rule.     

On the relationship between annotated logic programs and nonmonotonic formalisms

Abstract

In the past we developed a semantics for a restricted annotated logic language for inheritance reasoning. Here we generalize it to annotated Horn logic programs. We first provide a formal account of the language, describe its semantics, and provide an interpreter written in Prolog for it. We then investigate its relationship to Belnap's 4-valued logic, Gelfond and Lifschitz's semantics for logic programs with negation, Brewka's prioritized default logics and other annotated logics due to Kifer et al.     

Divide and Congruence Applied to η-Bisimulation

We present congruence formats for η- and rooted η-bisimulation equivalence. These formats are derived using a method for decomposing modal formulas in process algebra. To decide whether a process algebra term satisfies a modal formula, one can check whether its subterms satisfy formulas that are obtained by decomposing the original formula. The decomposition uses the structural operational semantics that underlies the process algebra.     

Analytic Calculi for Logics of Ordinal Multiples of Standard t-Norms

For two propositional fuzzy logics, we present analytic proofcalculi, based on relational hypersequents. The logic consideredfirst, called M, is based on the finite ordinal sums of ukasiewiczt-norms. In addition to the usual connectives—the conjunction, the implication and the constant 0—we use a furtherunary connective interpreted by the function associating witheach truth value a the greatest -idempotent below a. M is aconservative extension of Basic Logic. The second logic, called M, is based on the finite ordinal sumsof the product t-norm on (0, 1]. Our connectives are in thiscase just the conjunction and the implication.     

纤维逻辑

形式逻辑已经从简单命题逻辑发展到比较复杂的模态逻辑系列。但是在主体环境下,已有逻辑的复杂性仍然不能有效刻画主体复杂的心智。有一些人工智能研究者根据主体心智的多重性,在模态逻辑中引入多种模态算子,并借此对主体加以刻画。但是原来的可能世界语义却难以容纳如此复杂的语法,出现了很多不合理的地方。本文首先介绍了新近出现的纤维逻辑（fibring logics）,然后归纳了目前将此理论应用在主体BDI建模的研究现状,最后分析纤维逻辑的不足之处,讨论了其他可能的应用,并对今后的工作做了展望。     

A survey on temporal logics for specifying and verifying real-time systems

Over the last two decades, there has been an extensive study of logical formalisms on specifying and verifying real-time systems. Temporal logics have been an important research subject within this direction. Although numerous logics have been introduced for formal specification of real-time and complex systems, an up to date survey of these logics does not exist in the literature. In this paper we analyse various temporal formalisms introduced for specification, including propositional/first-order linear temporal logics, branching temporal logics, interval temporal logics, real-time temporal logics and probabilistic temporal logics. We give decidability, axiomatizability, expressiveness, model checking results for each logic analysed. We also provide a comparison of features of the temporal logics discussed.     

逻辑之间的语义忠实语义满翻译

翻译在计算机科学中的一个重要应用是实现一个逻辑与另一个逻辑在表达能力上的比较,以及利用目标逻辑的推理机实现源逻辑的推理.现有逻辑之间的翻译理论和性质没有深入研究逻辑的语义翻译,以及翻译是否保持不可满足性等问题.该文研究了一类同时保持公式的可满足性和不可满足性的翻译——语义忠实语义满翻译,给出了语义忠实语义满翻译的定义,比较了语义忠实语义满翻译与已有文献中翻译定义的区别和联系,讨论了逻辑的可靠性、完备性、可判定性、紧致性、公式的逻辑等价性,以及模型的初等等价性在语义忠实语义满翻译下被保持的问题.运用语义忠实语义满翻译的定义给出了逻辑之间的同义性定义,并证明了同义关系是逻辑之间的一个等价关系.