Phase I/II study of a short course of weekly cisplatin in patients with advanced solid tumours

Twenty-five patients with advanced solid tumours were entered in a phase I/II study of six, weekly cycles of cisplatin. Nineteen patients were chemonaive and six were previously treated. The starting dose was 50 mg m-2 week-1. This dose could be escalated without major toxicity to 70 mg m-2 week-1. At a dose of 80 mg m-2 myelosuppression grade 3 occurred as well as grade 1 nephro- and neurotoxicity. The maximum tolerated dose was 85 mg m-2 with dose limiting thrombocytopenia. Hypertonic saline was effective in preventing nephrotoxicity. Ondansetron was a very effective antiemetic in the first weeks of treatment but its efficacy waned later on. Responses were observed in head and neck cancer, melanoma and mesothelioma. At the dose level of 80 mg m-2 the optimal dose intensity was reached. This schedule will be tested further in phase II studies.     

Phase I and pharmacologic study of intermittent twice-daily oral therapy with capecitabine in patients with advanced and/or metastatic cancer

PURPOSE: Capecitabine is an orally administered fluoropyrimidine carbamate selectively activated to fluorouracil (5-FU) in tumors. It passes through the intestinal mucosal membrane intact and is subsequently activated by a cascade of three enzymes that results in the preferential release of 5-FU at the tumor site. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this phase I study, capecitabine was administered twice daily as outpatient therapy, each cycle administered for 2 weeks followed by 1 week of rest. Thirty-four patients with solid tumors, all of whom except three patients were pretreated, were treated at dose levels from 502 to 3,514 mg/m2 daily. RESULTS: The median treatment duration was four cycles (85 days; range, 14 to 833+ days). Two patients continue on treatment at 686 and 833+ days. Capecitabine 3,000 mg/m2 daily was not tolerable, with dose-limiting toxicities of diarrhea with hypotension, abdominal pain, and leukopenia. Palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE) became evident at higher dose levels after prolonged treatment. Evidence of objective tumor response was reported in four patients at 2,510 mg/m2 daily and greater (one complete response [CR] and three partial responses [PRs]) with subjective minor tumor responses in a further seven patients. Pharmacokinetic studies showed rapid gastrointestinal absorption of capecitabine, followed by extensive conversion into 5'-deoxy-5-fluorouridine (5'-DFUR), with only low systemic 5-FU levels. CONCLUSION: Capecitabine is a tolerable oral outpatient therapy that shows promising clinical activity in a variety of cancers. The recommended phase II dose is 2,510 mg/m2 daily administered by this intermittent schedule.     

Combination phase I/II study of irinotecan hydrochloride (CPT-11) and carboplatin in relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. CPT-11/Lymphoma Study Group

Irinotecan hydrochloride (CPT-11) is a new derivative of camptothecin which inhibits topoisomerase I. Phase II studies have demonstrated that CPT-11 is active against a broad spectrum of neoplasms including intractable non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. An early phase II study in lymphoma suggested that a schedule of daily infusions of 40 mg/m2/day for three or five consecutive days is more effective than a single infusion of 200 mg/m2 every three to four weeks. Carboplatin is also an active agent against lymphoma, and preclinical studies have shown that CPT-11 and its active metabolite have a synergistic effect with platinum compounds. To evaluate the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) and the therapeutic efficacy of CPT-11 in combination with carboplatin in relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, we conducted a combination phase I/II study. The starting dose of CPT-11 was 20 mg/m2/day (days 1 through 3 and 8 through 10), and dose escalations of 5 mg/m2/day increments were planned, with a fixed dose of carboplatin (300 mg/m2, day 1). Six of the eight patients receiving both agents at the starting dose level developed critical toxicities such as grade 4 hematologic (neutropenia 6/8, thrombocytopenia 1/8) and grade 3 non-hematologic toxicities (diarrhea 2/8, transaminase elevation 1/8). Further dose escalation of CPT-11 was halted, and the starting doses were judged to be the MTDs. The response rate (25%, 2/8) to the combination of the MTDs was not superior to that of CPT-11 alone in a previous phase II study (38%, 26/69), and the MTD of CPT-11 in combination with carboplatin was less than half the single-agent dose. We conclude that carboplatin is not recommendable for combination with CPT-11 in lymphoma patients. Other suitable agents for such a combination should be sought.     

Phase II study of 3-hour infusion of paclitaxel in patients with previously untreated stage III and IV non-small cell lung cancer. West Japan Lung Cancer Group

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Hysterectomy is believed to be associated with disturbed defecation, mainly constipation. This study longitudinally describes bowel function in women submitted for hysterectomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Rectoanal manovolumetry, whole gut transit time and detailed interviews on bowel function and dyspareunia were performed preoperatively and at 3 and 11-18 months after hysterectomy in 42 women. Twenty healthy women matched for age and parity served as manovolumetry controls. RESULTS: No significant changes in anal sphincter pressures could be demonstrated, neither early nor late after hysterectomy. Transit time was unaffected. All but one of the patients claimed that they had been suffering from one or more of the following symptoms; abdominal pain, distension, constipation and dysparenuia. While postoperative interviews revealed a significant improvement with respect to abdominal pain and dyspareunia (P < 0.01) after 3 and 11-18 months, improvement of abdominal distension and constipation proved to be transient only. CONCLUSION: Simple abdominal hysterectomy appears not to interfere adversely with bowel function. On the contrary many patients were relieved from abdominal pain present before operation.     

High-dose chemotherapy with carboplatin, etoposide and ifosfamide followed by autologous stem cell rescue in patients with relapsed or refractory malignant lymphomas: a phase I/II study

Patients with relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHL) and Hodgkin's disease (HD) with recurrences after an anthracyclin-containing regimen only have a chance of cure of below 10% with conventional chemotherapy. In order to improve their prognosis, we started a phase I/II trial using high-dose therapy comprising carboplatin, together with etoposide and ifosfamide (CEI), followed by autologous stem cell rescue (ASCR) as consolidation after salvage treatment. Since September 1990, 40 patients with intensively pretreated advanced NHL (n = 24) or HD (n = 16) received one cycle of high-dose therapy (HDT) consisting of carboplatin 1500 mg/m2, ifosfamide 10 g/m2 and etoposide in escalating doses from 1200 mg/m2 to 2400 mg/m2 followed by ASCR. Thirty-nine patients were assessable for toxicity and response. The following doses appeared to be safe: carboplatin 1500 mg/m2, etoposide 2400 mg/m2 and ifosfamide 10 g/m2. All patients developed grade 3 nausea and grade 3 or 4 mucositis. Granulocytopenic fever occurred in 100% with grade 4 infections in 15%. Mild transient kidney toxicity was noted in 36% and liver toxicity in 20% of patients. One toxic death occurred (2.5%). Objective responses were obtained in 36 of 39 patients (92%) with complete remissions (CR) in 24 patients (61.5%) and partial remissions (PR) in 12 (30.7%). Median observation time for surviving patients was 23.3 months (range 3.4-52.3). The probabilities of overall, event-free and relapse-free survival at 2 years are 62, 39 and 55%, respectively. Patients with primary refractory disease or resistant relapse had a poor prognosis. High-dose carboplatin, etoposide and ifosfamide plus autologous stem cell rescue represents an effective, potentially curative salvage treatment with acceptable toxicities.     

A phase I/II study of multicyclic dose-intensive chemotherapy supported with G-CSF, or G-CSF and haematopoietic progenitor cells in whole blood, in two consecutive cohorts of patients

We investigated the reconstitutive potential of haematopoietic progenitor cells collected in autologous whole blood during multicycle dose-intensified chemotherapy. Forty patients with metastatic solid tumours were treated with up to six cycles of cisplatin and escalating doses of ifosfamide every 14 days. Cisplatin was administered in 3% sodium chloride over 3 h, followed by ifosfamide over 24 h and mesna over 36 h. The first cohort of patients received granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) days 4-14. Once dose-limiting toxicity was reached in cohort 1, the study continued with a second cohort of patients, in whom, in addition to G-CSF on days 4-14, 500 ml of G-CSF and chemotherapy-'primed' whole blood was collected on day 15, i.e. on day 1 of treatment cycles two to six, before cisplatin administration. This volume of blood was kept unprocessed at 4 degrees C and reinfused 20-24 h after the completion of ifosfamide. In cohort 1, dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was reached at ifosfamide 6.0 g m(-2) with two out of six of the patients developing neutropenic fever. Although in cohort 2 no neutropenic fever was encountered, neither the frequency nor the duration of grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were reduced. Cumulative asthenia resulted in DLT at 7.0 g m(-2). The median number of CD34+ cells in 500 ml of whole blood after the first cycle (i.e. at start of cycle 2) was 1.15 x 10(6) kg(-1). This number was significantly greater after the second cycle (2.06 x 10(6) kg(-1), P = 0.01) and then gradually decreased after cycles three to six. After storing whole blood, the number of CD34+ cells had not decreased (median + 10%). We conclude that the method of combined bone marrow support by G-CSF and haematopoietic progenitor cells in autologous whole blood collected before each cycle of a 2-weekly regimen of cisplatin-ifosfamide does not result in clinically measurable reduced bone marrow toxicity compared with what can be expected by the use of G-CSF alone.