Biological profile of L-745,870, a selective antagonist with high affinity for the dopamine D4 receptor

L-745,870,(3-([4-(4-chlorophenyl)piperazin-1-yl]methyl)-1H- pyrollo[2,3-b] pyridine, was identified as a selective dopamine D4 receptor antagonist with excellent oral bioavailability and brain penetration. L-745,870 displaced specific binding of 0.2 nM [3H] spiperone to cloned human dopamine D4 receptors with a binding affinity (Ki) of 0. 43 nM which was 5- and 20-fold higher than that of the standard antipsychotics haloperidol and clozapine, respectively. L-745,870 exhibited high selectivity for the dopamine D4 receptor (>2000 fold) compared to other dopamine receptor subtypes and had moderate affinity for 5HT2, sigma and alpha adrenergic receptors(IC50 < 300 nM). In vitro, L-745,870 (0.1-1 microM) exhibited D4 receptor antagonist activity, reversing dopamine (1 microM) mediated 1) inhibition of adenylate cyclase in hD4HEK and hD4CHO cells; 2) stimulation of [35S] GTPgammaS binding and 3) stimulation of extracellular acidification rate, but did not exhibit any significant intrinsic activity in these assays. Although standard antipsychotics increase dopamine metabolism or plasma prolactin levels in rodents, L-745,870 (相似文献   

Synthesis and degradation of proteins in cultured, androgen-responsive tumour cells

In a series of pharmacological tests the ability of 0.6 mg/kg of the anticholinergic scopolamine to decrease the effectiveness of the neuroleptic heloperidol varied widely. Most severely attenuated was production of catalepsy followed in order of decreasing interference by inhibition of amphetamine-induced rotation, inhibition of amphetamine- or apomorphine-induced stereotyped behavior, inhibition of conditioned avoidance responding and lastly attenuation of the haloperidol-induced increase in striatal HVA. By use of such a relatively low dose of scopolamine the behavioral effects of heloperidol were dissociated from effects on dopamine turnover in the striatum. If behavioral tests in animals can be related to the clinical effects of neuroleptic drugs, those effects of haloperidol severely reduced by scopolamine may be related to extrapyramidal effects.     

Discriminative stimulus properties of the atypical neuroleptic clozapine in rats: tests with subtype selective receptor ligands

The interoceptive stimulus induced by clozapine (5 mg/kg, i.p.) has been characterized in an operant drug discrimination procedure in the rat using a wide range of receptor subtype-selective agonists and antagonists. Only the muscarinic receptor antagonist scopolamine generalized fully to clozapine (>80%). Partial generalization (defined here as 40% maximal generalization) was seen with the D1 receptor antagonist SCH 23390 (43% maximal generalization), the alpha1-adrenoceptor antagonist prazosin (67%) and the alpha2-adrenoceptor antagonist methoxyidazoxan (42%). All other specific agents tested induced <25% maximal generalization, including the alpha2-adrenoceptor antagonist yohimbine (24%), the histamine H1 receptor antagonist mepyramine (21%), the D2 antagonist typical neuroleptic haloperidol (23%), the D4 receptor antagonist L-745,870 (14%), the 5-hydroxytryptamine-1A (5-HT1A) receptor agonist S-14506 (8%), the 5-HT2A receptor antagonists ketanserin (0%) and M100907 (12%), the 5-HT2B/2C receptor antagonists SB 200646A (8%) and SDZ SER 082 (6%), and the 5-HT3 receptor antagonist ondansetron (0%). The clozapine discriminative stimulus was not blocked by the dopamine D1 receptor antagonist SCH 23390, or by the 5-HT1A receptor antagonist WAY 100635, when given concomitantly with clozapine. Although the results suggest that muscarinic antagonism plays a major role in the clozapine cue, the results have to be considered in the light of the full generalization to clozapine seen with various antipsychotic agents which have very low affinity for muscarinic receptors, including zotepine, quetiapine, JL13 and PNU 96415 (a finding replicated in rats from the same breeding colony as those which generalized to scopolamine). Thus, generalization to clozapine for antipsychotics with multiple affinities but with low muscarinic affinity is probably mediated by additive or perhaps supra-additive actions at other receptors, although extensive studies with various combinations of drug mixtures are required to validate this hypothesis.     

S 18126 ([2-[4-(2,3-dihydrobenzo[1,4]dioxin-6-yl)piperazin-1-yl methyl]indan-2-yl]), a potent, selective and competitive antagonist at dopamine D4 receptors: an in vitro and in vivo comparison with L 745,870 (3-(4-[4-chlorophenyl]piperazin-1-yl)methyl-1H-pyrrolo[2, 3b]pyridine) and raclopride

The novel benzoindane S 18126 possessed > 100-fold higher affinity at cloned, human (h) D4 (Ki = 2.4 nM) vs. hD2 (738 nM), hD3 (2840 nM), hD1 (> 3000 nM) and hD5 (> 3000 nM) receptors and about 50 other sites, except sigma1 receptors (1.6 nM). L 745,870 similarly showed selectivity for hD4 (2.5 nM) vs. hD2 (905 nM) and hD3 (> 3000 nM) receptors. In contrast, raclopride displayed low affinity at hD4 (> 3000 nM) vs. hD2 (1.1 nM) and hD3 receptors (1.4 nM). Stimulation of [35S]-GTPgammaS binding at hD4 receptors by dopamine (DA) was blocked by S 18126 and L 745,870 with Kb values of 2.2 and 1.0 nM, respectively, whereas raclopride (> 1000 nM) was inactive. In contrast, raclopride inhibited stimulation of [35S]-GTPgammaS binding at hD2 sites by DA with a Kb of 1.4 nM, whereas S 18126 (> 1000 nM) and L 745,870 (> 1000 nM) were inactive. As concerns presynaptic dopaminergic receptors, raclopride (0.01-0.05 mg/kg s.c. ) markedly enhanced DA synthesis in mesocortical, mesolimbic and nigrostriatal dopaminergic pathways. In contrast, even high doses (2. 5-40.0 mg/kg s.c.) of S 18126 and L 745,870 were only weakly active. Similarly, raclopride (0.016 mg/kg i.v.) abolished inhibition of the firing rate of ventrotegmental dopaminergic neurons by apomorphine, whereas even high doses (0.5 mg/kg i.v.) of S 18126 and L 745,870 were only weakly active. As regards postsynaptic dopaminergic receptors, raclopride potently (0.01-0.3 mg/kg s.c.) reduced rotation elicited by quinpirole in rats with unilateral lesions of the substantia nigra, antagonized induction of hypothermia by PD 128, 907, blocked amphetamine-induced hyperlocomotion and was effective in six further models of potential antipsychotic activity. In contrast, S 18126 and L 745,870 were only weakly active in these models (5.0-> 40.0 mg/kg s.c.). In six models of extrapyramidal and motor symptoms, such as induction of catalepsy, raclopride was likewise potently active (0.01-2.0 mg/kg s.c.) whereas S 18126 and L 745,870 were only weakly active (10.0-80.0 mg/kg s.c.). In freely moving rats, raclopride (0.16 mg/kg s.c.) increased levels of DA by + 55% in dialysates of the frontal cortex. However, it also increased levels of DA in the accumbens and striatum by 70% and 75%, respectively. In contrast to raclopride, at a dose of 0.16 mg/kg s.c. , neither S 18126 nor L 745,870 modified frontal cortex levels of DA. However, at a high dose (40.0 mg/kg s.c.), S 18126 increased dialysate levels of DA (+ 85%) and noradrenaline (+ 100%), but not serotonin (+ 10%), in frontal cortex without affecting DA levels in accumbens (+ 10%) and striatum (+ 10%). In conclusion, S 18126 and L 745,870 behave as potent and selective antagonists of cloned, hD4 vs. other dopaminergic receptor types in vitro. However, their in vivo effects at high doses probably reflect residual antagonist actions at D2 (or D3) receptors. Selective blockade of D4 receptors was thus associated neither with a modification of dopaminergic transmission nor with antipsychotic (antiproductive) or extrapyramidal properties. The functional effects of selective D4 receptor blockade remain to be established.     

Role of renal interstitial pressure on chronic control of arterial blood pressure

We examined the modulatory effect of serotonergic activities on haloperidol-induced up-regulation of dopamine D2 receptors in rat striatum. Chronic treatment with haloperidol (0.1, 0.5 mg/kg, i.p., 3 weeks) increased the number of dopamine D2 receptors, while no increase was observed with atypical antipsychotic drugs clozapine (10 mg/kg) and ORG 5222 (0.25 mg/kg). Chronic treatment with MK 212, a serotonin (5-HT)2A/2C receptor agonist (2.5 mg/kg), or with citalopram, a 5-HT reuptake inhibitor (10 mg/kg), potentiated the haloperidol (0.1 mg/kg)-induced up-regulation of dopamine D2 receptor, while that with (+/-)-8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino) tetralin (8-OH-DPAT), a 5-HT1A receptor agonist (0.1 mg/kg), had no influence on the dopamine D2 receptor up-regulation. Co-administration of ritanserin (1 mg/kg), a 5-HT2A/2C receptor antagonist, with a low dose of haloperidol (0.1 mg/kg), but not with a high dose of the agent (0.5 mg/kg), attenuated the dopamine D2 receptor up-regulation. Drug occupation of 5-HT2A and dopamine D2 receptors in vivo examined with use of N-ethoxycarbonyl-2-ethoxy-1,2-dihydroquinoline (EEDQ) was 69.8% and 45.1%, respectively, after the acute administration of haloperidol (0.1 mg/kg) plus ritanserin (1 mg/kg). This profile that 5-HT2A receptors were highly occupied compared with dopamine D2 receptors was similar to that of clozapine or ORG 5222. These results suggest that potent 5-HT2A receptor antagonism versus weak dopamine D2 receptor blockade may be involved in the absence of up-regulation of dopamine D2 receptors after chronic treatment with clozapine or ORG 5222.     

Sex differences in nicotine sensitization and conditioned hyperactivity in adolescent rats neonatally treated with quinpirole: Role of D2 and D3 receptor subtypes.

Neonatal quinpirole treatment in rats produces increased sensitivity of dopamine D2-like receptors throughout the animal’s lifetime, referred to as D2 priming. There is little information on the effects of nicotine in adolescent rats, especially in a model that has clinical relevance to psychosis where increased D2 receptor sensitivity is common. Male and female rats were treated with quinpirole (1 mg/kg) or saline from postnatal (P) day 1–P21, given nicotine (0.5 mg/kg) or saline from P33 through P49, and placed into a locomotor arena for behavioral testing. Nicotine or saline treatment was preceded by the D2-like receptor antagonist eticlopride, D3 antagonist nafadotride, or saline. Conditioned hyperactivity was analyzed on P50 in the same context in a drug-free test. In females, D2 priming increased the locomotor response to acute nicotine, but did not affect subsequent nicotine sensitization, and only non–D2-primed females demonstrated conditioned hyperactivity. Eticlopride and nafadotride blocked behavioral sensitization, although nafadotride was more effective at blocking nicotine-conditioned hyperactivity in females. In males, D? priming enhanced sensitization to nicotine and produced conditioned hyperactivity, which were blocked by eticlopride and nafadotride. These results have implications for psychosis and comorbidity of nicotine abuse in adolescence. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Clozapine, haloperidol, and the D4 antagonist PNU-101387G: in vivo effects on mesocortical, mesolimbic, and nigrostriatal dopamine and serotonin release

With in vivo microvoltammetry, the dopamine (DA) receptor antagonists, clozapine (D4/D2), haloperidol (D2) and the selective D4 antagonist, PNU-101387G, were evaluated for their effects on DA and serotonin (5-HT) release within A10 neuronal terminal fields [mesocortical, prefrontal cortex (PFC), mesolimbic, nucleus accumbens, (NAcc)] and within A9 neuronal terminal fields [nigrostriatal, caudate putamen (CPU)], in chloral hydrate anesthetized rats. Clozapine, which also has 5-HT2 receptor antagonist properties, significantly (p < 0.001) increased DA release within A10 terminal fields, PFC and NAcc; DA release was not increased by clozapine within A9 terminals, CPU. Serotonin release was significantly (p < 0.001) increased by clozapine within A10 and A9 terminal fields. Haloperidol significantly (p < 0.001) increased DA release within PFC, dramatically and significantly (p < 0.001) increased DA release within CPU, but not within NAcc; haloperidol had a small but statistically significant (p < 0.05) increase on 5-HT release within PFC [only at the highest dose studied (2.5 mg/kg)] and within CPU [only at the lowest dose studied 1.0 mg/kg) (p < 0.05)]. The selective D4 antagonist, PNU-101387G dramatically and significantly (p < 0.001) increased DA release within PFC, modestly, but significantly (p < 0.001) increased DA release within CPU, did not alter DA release within NAcc at the lowest dose studied (1.0 mg/kg) and significantly (p < 0.05) decreased DA release within NAcc at the highest dose studied (1.0 mg/kg). The selective D4 antagonist did not affect 5-HT release within either A10 or A9 terminal fields. The present data are discussed in terms of the neurochemistry, antipsychotic activity, and side effect profiles of clozapine and haloperidol, in order to provide comparative profiles for a selective D4 antagonist, PNU-101387G.     

Emergency coronary artery surgery after failed PTCA: myocardial protection with continuous coronary perfusion of beta-blocker-enriched blood

MK-801 (dizocilpine), a noncompetitive N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist, induces dystonia in monkeys at doses of 0.08 mg/kg. This syndrome was tested with the dopamine D1 receptor antagonist NNC 756, the DA D2 receptor antagonist raclopride, the atypical antipsychotic clozapine, the dopamine D1 receptor agonist SKF 81297, the dopamine D2/D3 receptor agonist quinpirole, the anticholinergic biperiden, amphetamine, and the benzodiazepine midazolam in 7 Cebus apella monkeys previously treated with dopaminergic agents. NNC 756 (0.004 and 0.01 mg/kg), raclopride (0.004 and 0.01 mg/kg), SKF 81297 (0.3 and 0.6 mg/kg), quinpirole (0.1 and 0.2 mg/kg), amphetamine (0.25 and 0.5 mg/kg), and biperiden (0.125 and up to 1.0 mg/kg), had no significant effect on MK-801-induced dystonia. In contrast, both clozapine (2.0 mg/kg) and midazolam (0.4 and 1.0 mg/kg) reduced the dystonia caused by MK-801. Dystonia induced by dopamine D1 and D2 antagonists is easily antagonized by biperiden and dopamine agonists, whereas these drugs had no significant effect on MK-801-induced dystonia. It has been proposed that dystonia may be caused by a sudden drop in the output from the basal ganglia that is primarily GABAergic. Midazolam's enhancing effect on the GABAergic tone is consistent with this hypothesis. The effect of clozapine is more difficult to explain, but this drug has a rich pharmacology and suggests an agonistic glutamatergic effect.     

Non-amphetaminic mechanism of stimulant locomotor effect of modafinil in mice

Previously established dose-response curves indicated that modafinil 20-40 mg/kg i.p. elicited in mice an obvious stimulation of locomotor activity roughly similar to that induced by (+)amphetamine 2-4 mg/kg. The effects of various agents modifying dopamine transmission were compared on the locomotor response to both drugs. The preferential D2 dopamine receptor antagonist haloperidol 37.5-150 micrograms/kg i.p. suppressed the stimulant effect of (+)amphetamine in a dose dependent manner, but not that of modafinil. The D1 dopamine receptor antagonist SCH 23390 (7.5-30 micrograms/kg s.c.) reversed the (+)amphetamine but not the modafinil induced hyperactivity. The tyrosine hydroxylase inhibitor alpha-methyl-para-tyrosine (200 mg/kg) suppressed the hyperactivity induced by 4 mg/kg dexamphetamine but not that induced by 20 mg/kg modafinil. Associating L-DOPA 150 mg/kg and benserazide 37.5 mg/kg with (+)amphetamine 2 mg/kg resulted in stereotyped climbing behavior, that was not observed with modafinil 10-80 mg/kg. The profound akinesia induced by reserpine (4 mg/kg s.c.; 5 h before testing) was reversed by (+)amphetamine 2 mg/kg but not by modafinil 40 mg/kg. Finally, on synaptosomes prepared from mouse striata preloaded with [3H]dopamine, modafinil 10(-5) M did not increase the spontaneous [3H]dopamine release whereas (+)amphetamine, at the same concentration, doubled it. From all these differences between the two drugs, it is concluded that the mechanism underlying the modafinil induced stimulant locomotor effect differs completely from that of (+)amphetamine.     

Investigations into the nature of a 7-OH-DPAT discriminative cue: comparison with D-amphetamine

In the present study, separate squads of rats were trained to discriminate either the dopamine D3 receptor preferring ligand 7-hydroxy-2-(di-N-propylamino)-tetralin (7-OH-DPAT) (0.03 mg/kg) from saline, or D-amphetamine (0.3 mg/kg) from saline using a standard operant schedule (FR10 schedule reinforcement). Following stable acquisition of responding, tests of generalisation and antagonism were conducted. A number of dopamine agonists having high dopamine D2-like receptor (D2, D3 or D4) affinity generalised to the 7-OH-DPAT, but not amphetamine, cue. The dopamine D2/3 receptor agonist SKF38393 showed no generalisation to either drug cue. Subsequent correlational analysis suggested that this effect was most likely mediated through the dopamine D3 receptor. The dopamine D2/3 receptor antagonist raclopride significantly attenuated both cues. The failure of these drugs to generalise to amphetamine, suggest that there is little involvement of the dopamine D3 receptor subtype in mediating its discriminative stimulus properties.     

Laryngeal tuberculosis and laryngeal cancer

The primary objective of this study was to determine whether the development of behavioral sensitization to the putative dopamine D3 receptor agonist 7-OH-DPAT could be prevented by either selective D1-type or D2-type dopamine receptor antagonists. In three experiments, male Wistar rats (250-350 g) were given seven to nine injections (at 48-h intervals) of 7-OH-DPAT (1.0 mg/kg, SC) or vehicle in combination with the D2-type dopamine antagonist eticlopride (0.3 mg/kg, SC), the D1-type dopamine antagonist SCH 23390 (0.1 or 0.2 mg/kg, SC), or vehicle. After the injections, the rats were tested for locomotor activity in photocell arenas for 2 h. In the first two experiments, after seven injections, all rats were tested for activity following vehicle injections to test for possible conditioning effects. In each experiment, after the last pre-exposure session, all rats were given a challenge injection of 7-OH-DPAT (1.0 mg/kg, SC) and tested for activity. Major findings were as follows: a) 7-OH-DPAT treatments produced a progressively greater increase in locomotor activity with repeated treatment; b) concurrent treatment with eticlopride or SCH 23390 (0.1 and 0.2 mg/kg) blocked the acute locomotor-activating effects of 7-OH-DPAT across days; c) eticlopride, but not SCH 23390, completely blocked the development of behavioral sensitization to 7-OH-DPAT. Although the low dose of SCH 23390 (0.1 mg/kg) produced a partial attenuation of sensitization, the higher dose (0.2 mg/kg) of SCH 23390 appeared to augment, rather than block, sensitization to 7-OH-DPAT; d) rats previously treated with SCH 23390 (0.2 mg/kg, but not 0.1 mg/kg) without 7-OH-DPAT displayed a hyperactive response to the 7-OH-DPAT challenge injection; and e) after vehicle injections, rats previously given 7-OH-DPAT, SCH 23390, or eticlopride either alone or in combination were more active than vehicle control rats. These findings suggest that the neurochemical mechanisms mediating the development of behavioral sensitization to 7-OH-DPAT may differ from those of other dopamine D2-type agonists such as quinpirole or bromocriptine. Moreover, these results demonstrate that hyperactivity responses following vehicle injections in drug-pretreated animals do not necessarily reflect conditioning mechanisms.     

AMPA-receptors are involved in the expression of amphetamine-induced behavioural sensitisation, but not in the expression of amphetamine-induced conditioned activity in mice

We investigated the role of the alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionate (AMPA) receptor antagonist 2,3-dihydroxy-6-nitro-7-sulfamoyl-benzo[f]quinoxaline (NBQX) in the expression of amphetamine-induced behavioural sensitisation and amphetamine-induced conditioned activity in mice. Repeated weekly administration of amphetamine (0.375 mg/kg) for 7 weeks led to an increased locomotor response when challenged with amphetamine 1 week later. NBQX attenuated this increased response at doses (3 and 30 mg/kg) which had no effect on the acute locomotor response to amphetamine. In a separate experiment, mice given amphetamine (1 mg/kg) in a distinctive environment, showed an increased locomotor response within this environment following a subsequent saline administration. NBQX (5-20 mg/kg) had no effect on the expression of this conditioned response. These results suggest that AMPA receptors are involved in the expression of amphetamine-induced behavioural sensitisation in mice, and that this involvement is limited to either the neurobiological effects of amphetamine or the effects of amphetamine on conditioned associations, rather than drug environment conditioned associations.     

Behavioral and neurochemical study on the role of the brain cholecystokinin system in anxiety

In order to elucidate the involvement of cholecystokinin (CCK) in the regulation of anxiety, the author examined the effects of the selective non-peptide CCKB receptor antagonist LY288513 on freezing behavior induced by conditioned fear stress, an animal model of anxiety. Rats were individually subjected to 5 min of inescapable electric footshock in a shock chamber. Twenty-four hours after the footshock, the rats were again placed in the shock chamber and observed for 5 min without shocks: this procedure is termed conditioned fear stress. Subcutaneous administration of LY288513 30 min before footshock (0.3 mg/kg) and 30 min before conditioned fear stress (0.03-0.3 mg/kg) reduced conditioned freezing. This indicates that LY288513 blocked both the acquisition and expression of conditioned fear. The relatively selective non-peptide CCKA receptor antagonist, lorglumide, blocked the expression of conditioned fear, but only at a high dose (1.0 mg/kg). The peripheral non-peptide CCKA/B receptor antagonist, loxiglumide, failed to do so. Subcutaneous administration of LY288513 (3 mg/kg) enhanced the conditioned fear-induced in 3, 4-dihydroxy-phenylacetic acid (DOPAC) contents in the medial prefrontal cortex, which was assayed by high performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection. Thirty min of inescapable electric footshock decreased CCK8S contents in the amygdala, which was assayed by radioimmunoassay. These results suggest that the brain CCKB receptors are involved in the regulation of anxiety, and that the anxiolytic effects of CCKB receptor antagonists are mediated by increasing dopamine activity in the medial prefrontal cortex. Furthermore, it is possible that the CCK neurons in the amygdala are also associated with anxiety.     

Role of (+)-SKF-10,047-sensitive sub-population of sigma 1 receptors in amelioration of conditioned fear stress in rats: association with mesolimbic dopaminergic systems

Rats exhibited a marked suppression of motility when they were re-placed in the same environment as that in which they had previously received an electric footshock. We examined the behavioral and neurochemical effects of (+)-N-allylnormetazocine hydrochloride ((+)-SKF-10,047) and (+)-pentazocine, putative sigma 1 receptor ligands, on this psychological-stress-induced motor suppression, defined as a conditioned fear stress. (+)-SKF-10,047 (3 and 6 mg/kg) dose-dependently attenuated the conditioned fear stress, whereas (+)-pentazocine failed to do so even at a higher dose (32 mg/kg). In rats showing the conditioned fear stress, dopamine turnover (i.e., the ratio of dopamine metabolites/dopamine contents) was decreased in the nucleus accumbens and was increased in the medial prefrontal cortex, but remained unchanged in the striatum. (+)-SKF-10,047 (3 and 6 mg/kg) dose-dependently reversed the decreased dopamine turnover in the nucleus accumbens without changing the increased dopamine turnover in the medial prefrontal cortex. (+)-Pentazocine (32 mg/kg) did not affect the stress-induced changes in dopamine turnover in these brain regions. Thus, the decreased dopamine turnover in the nucleus accumbens appears to be involved in the conditioned fear stress. These results suggest that (+)-SKF-10,047 ameliorates the conditioned fear stress by reversing the psychological stress-induced dysfunction in the mesolimbic dopaminergic systems, and that the (+)-SKF-10,047-sensitive sub-population of sigma 1 receptors may play in important role in this stress response.     

Long-term treatment with haloperidol or clozapine does not affect dopamine D4 receptors in rat frontal cortex

We examined the effects of long-term treatment with haloperidol and clozapine on dopamine D4 receptors in rat frontal cortex. Dopamine D4 receptor binding sites were indirectly determined from the displacement experiments of [3H]clozapine binding using nemonapride. Three-weeks administration of haloperidol (0.5 mg/kg) or clozapine (10 mg/kg) did not significantly affect the D4 receptors in the frontal cortex. The density of D2 receptors, determined by [3H]spiperone binding to striatum, was increased by long-term treatment with haloperidol, but it was not significantly changed by that with clozapine.     

5-HT2A/2C receptor agonists potentiate the discriminative cue of (+)-amphetamine in the rat

The possible effect of 5-HT2A/2C receptor agonists on an amphetamine-induced behavioral response was examined using the two-lever drug discrimination paradigm. The experiments were designed to investigate an interaction of the hallucinogenic 5-HT2A/2C agonists lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) and 2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodoamphetamine (DOI), with the discriminative stimulus elicited by a relatively low dose of (+)-amphetamine (1.35 micromol/kg, 0.25 mg/kg, which produced approximately 50% selection of the drug lever). DOI and LSD did not produce amphetamine-like responding at any dose tested or time of administration. However, LSD alone was able to induce a drug-appropriate response in two of nine amphetamine-trained rats. Simultaneous administration of DOI or LSD with amphetamine was not significantly different from the response produced by amphetamine alone. Pre-administration of DOI (3 hr) or of LSD (2 hr) before amphetamine, however, evoked significant enhancement of the amphetamine cue. The results suggest that the enhanced behavioral response to amphetamine may be due either to an increased sensitivity of dopaminergic neurons in the mesolimbic area, or to an enhanced release of dopamine by amphetamine.     

Effect of scopolamine on the efflux of dopamine and its metabolites after clozapine, haloperidol or thioridazine

The extracellular concentrations of dopamine (DA) and its metabolites, dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC) and homovanillic acid (HVA), in the striatum and the nucleus accumbens were measured in awake, freely-moving rats. Clozapine (20 mg/kg, i.p.) increased extracellular DA and HVA in both regions but increased DOPAC only in the striatum. Scopolamine (1 mg/kg), although it had no effect by itself in the striatum or nucleus accumbens, inhibited the ability of clozapine to increase extracellular DA, DOPAC and HVA concentrations in the striatum. The clozapine-induced increase in DA in the frontal cortex was not blocked by scopolamine. Haloperidol (1 mg/kg, i.p.) and thioridazine (10 mg/kg, i.p.) also increased extracellular DA, DOPAC and HVA in the striatum, but scopolamine pretreatment did not inhibit these increases. The results suggest that clozapine differs from haloperidol and thioridazine in that the effect of clozapine, but not that of the two neuroleptic drugs, to increase DA release in the striatum acutely depends on muscarinic receptor stimulation. These results suggest that clozapine, despite its strong muscarinic antagonist properties, does not produce full blockade of muscarinic receptors in vivo in the striatum. The interaction of clozapine with the cholinergic system in the striatum could be relevant to its lack of ability to produce extrapyramidal symptoms or tardive dyskinesia.     

Clozapine and haloperidol block the induction of behavioral sensitization to amphetamine and associated genomic responses in rats

Behavioral sensitization resulting from repeated, intermittent exposure to psychostimulants such as amphetamine (Amp) is hypothesized to model pathophysiology of psychotic disorders. The present study was designed to characterize the effects of a typical and an atypical antipsychotic drug, haloperidol and clozapine, respectively, on the induction of context-independent sensitization to Amp. Peripheral Amp treatment for five days (2 mg/kg/day, s.c.) produced an augmented stimulant response to an acute Amp challenge (2 mg/kg, s.c.) given seven days after the last pretreatment injection. Interestingly, preexposure to high doses of either clozapine (20 mg/kg) or haloperidol (0.5 mg/kg) alone also led to a sensitized behavioral response to an acute Amp challenge. The cross-sensitization between Amp and high doses of the haloperidol and clozapine may have occluded any blockade of Amp behavioral sensitization by the antipsychotics. Indeed, administration of a lower dose of clozapine (4 mg/kg) or haloperidol (0.1 mg/kg) with Amp during the preexposure phase clearly blocked the induction of behavioral sensitization. In addition to the behavioral sensitization, Amp-pretreated rats showed a reduction in the ability of the acute Amp challenge to induce c-fos mRNA in the medial prefrontal cortex and neurotensin/neuromedin N (NT/N) mRNA in the nucleus accumbens-shell. At doses that blocked the initiation of behavioral sensitization to Amp, clozapine fully and haloperidol partially restored the capacity of acute Amp to induce c-fos and NT/N gene expression. These data lend support to the psychostimulant-sensitization model of psychosis and a role of dopamine D2-like receptors in the phenomenon.     

The antisecretory effects of clozapine, a dopamine D4 receptor antagonist, are blocked by the dopamine D1 receptor antagonist, SCH23390

Dopaminergic compounds affect gastric secretion and response to experimental gastric mucosal injury. We showed previously that the novel dopamine D4 receptor antagonist, clozapine, significantly reduces gastric acid secretion and restraint stress-induced gastric lesions. Because the selectivity of clozapine for D4 receptors has recently been questioned, we tested the ability of a known D1 receptor blocker, SCH23390, to affect clozapine-induced reduction in gastric acid secretion. SCH23390 given i.p. or i.c.v., at doses that did not affect gastric acid secretion, significantly blocked the anti-secretory effect of clozapine, administered either peripherally or centrally. These data suggest that neither clozapine nor SCH23390 exhibit as high a degree of selectivity for the dopamine D4 and D1 receptor, respectively, as previously believed.     

The dopamine D3 receptor antagonist, (+)-S 14297, blocks the cataleptic properties of haloperidol in rats

In contrast to haloperidol, the selective dopamine D3 receptor antagonist, (+)-S 11566 [(+/-)-[7-(N,N-dipropylamino)-5,6,7,8-tetrahydro- naphtho(2,3b)dihydro,2,3-furanel]] and its active isomer, (+)-S 14297, induced neither catalepsy nor reduced conditioned avoidance responses in rats. (+)-S 11566 and (+)-S 14297 did, however, dose-dependently abolish the cataleptic actions of haloperidol. This action was expressed stereospecifically inasmuch as (-)-S 17777, the inactive distomer of (+)-S 14297, was ineffective. Further, the influence of haloperidol upon conditioned avoidance responses was not affected by (+)-S 14297. These data suggest that blockade of dopamine D3 receptors may inhibit the extrapyramidal but not-as based on the conditioned avoidance response paradigm-antipsychotic actions of neuroleptics.