生物质半焦高温水蒸汽气化反应动力学的研究

利用高温定碳炉研究了1000~1300℃条件下水蒸汽与生物质半焦的反应过程以及反应性.研究结果表明:高温条件下有利于缩短反应时间,提高CO产率;3种生物质半焦的反应性表现出相同的趋势,当转化率在0.3~0.4之间时,生物质半焦的反应性达到最大值,随后又降低;含碳量及灰中金属氧化物含量对其反应性存在一定的影响;生物质半焦的水蒸汽气化行为可以用未反应收缩核模型来描述.在水蒸汽分压不变的情况下,求出了3种生物质半焦的动力学参数,并对比了不同转化率时的动力学参数.     

生物质气流床气化制取合成气的试验研究

利用一套小型生物质层流气流床气化系统,研究了稻壳、红松、水曲柳和樟木松4种生物质在不同反应温度、氧气/生物质比率(O/B)、水蒸汽/生物质比率(S/B)以及停留时间下对合成气成分、碳转化率、H2/CO以及CO/CO2比率的影响.研究表明4种生物质在常压气流床气化生成合成气最佳O/B范围为0.2～0.3(气化温度.1300℃),高温气化时合成气中CH4含量很低,停留时间为1.6s时其气化反应基本完毕.加大水蒸汽含量可增加H2/CO比率,在S/B为0.8时H2/CO比率都在1以上,但水蒸汽的过多引入会影响煤气产率.气化温度是生物质气流床气化最重要的影响因素之一.     

在碱金属催化作用下煤焦与CO2的气化反应

利用固定床实验装置、以CO2作为气化剂，进行煤焦气化反应动力学的研究，分析了碱金属的含量及气化温度对煤焦-CO2气化反应的影响。采用未反应核收缩模型对试验数据进行处理，得到气化反应动力学参数。发现气化温度对煤焦与CO2的气化反应影响显著，碱金属作为煤焦-CO2气化反应的催化剂，能够降低反应过程的活化能，提高反应速率，用未反应核收缩模型能够很好地描述煤焦。CO2的气化反应过程。     

生物质灰对煤-生物质混焦气化特性影响的实验研究

在自行设计搭建的气化实验装置上对稻灰和松灰2种生物质灰样对煤焦气化特性的影响进行实验,并对酸洗、水洗脱灰方式对生物质-煤混焦气化特性的影响进行研究。研究发现,松灰和稻灰对煤焦气化反应均有较好的催化作用,松灰催化的平均气化速率是稻灰催化的1.85倍;生物质酸洗脱灰后,煤-生物质焦的混焦气化特性出现一定程度的劣化,松木屑酸洗脱灰后混合焦样平均气化速率相对原值降低47.58%;稻秆水洗脱灰后的混合焦样平均气化速率相对原值降低46.65%,但松木屑水洗脱灰后的混合焦样平均气化速率相对原值增加29.21%。     

掺混比例对生物质和煤流化床共气化特性影响的试验研究

采用新型床料在鼓泡流化床中进行了2种典型的木本和草本生物质与烟煤的空气-水蒸气气化试验,研究了生物质掺混比例对燃气组分和热值、气化效率及碳转化率等参数的影响规律.结果表明:当松木屑的掺混比例从0%增大到100%时,H2和CO的体积含量分别增加了4.6%和4.4%,CO2的体积含量减少了3%,CH4和CnHm的含量也有所增加;当稻秸的掺混比例从0%增大到100%时,CO的体积含量先从25.8%上升至27.5%,再下降至25.3%,其他燃气组分的变化趋势与松木屑和煤气化的相类似;随着生物质掺混比例的增加,2种生物质和煤共气化的气化效率和碳转化率均有所提高,且在共气化过程中存在协同效应.     

聚丙烯类废塑料空气气化特性试验研究

以单一粒径2mm的聚丙烯树脂为试验物料，空气作为气化介质，在内径100mm，高3．5m流化床反应器内对聚丙烯类塑料的空气气化特性进行了试验研究。试验结果表明，在650—750℃温度区域内气化，其燃气成分主要是气相碳氢化合物CH4、C2Hm(m=2，4，6)等，CO和H2所占比例很少．随气化温度的升高，CH4、CO和H2含量增加，C2Hm含量下降，在相同的气化温度下，床层高度增加，CH4和H2含量略有增加，CO含量基本保持不变。焦油和焦炭的产率较低并随气化温度的提高而降低，空气系数增加，燃烧份额提高，气化炉温度也相应增加。同时还比较分析了生物质和煤与聚丙烯空气气化特性。     

焦油对生物质气化再燃还原NO的影响

采用配制含焦油模型化合物的生物质气的方法,实验研究了焦油的加入对生物质气化再燃还原NO的影响.模拟的生物质气化气由H2、CH4、CO、CO2、N2构成,并选择了苯、甲苯、苯酚和苯乙烯作为焦油模型化合物.实验在电加热的刚玉管流反应器中进行,实验温度在900～1,400,℃之间.研究了反应器入口焦油含量、氧气浓度、NO初始浓度、反应停留时间及反应温度等因素对还原NO的影响,分析了含焦油的生物质气化再燃特性.证实了焦油有助于提高生物质气化气还原NO的效率;含焦油的生物质气化再燃的最佳当量比在1.20～1.65之间,并且随着NO初始浓度的增加及停留时间的延长,NO还原效率逐渐增加;高温下,焦油含量较高时,有炭黑生成.     

添加生物质气化气的选择性非催化还原研究

提出利用生物质气化气为选择性非催化还原技术（SNCR）反应的添加剂,并进行相应的反应动力学计算。计算结果表明生物质气化气作为添加剂可以提高低温条件下SNCR反应的脱硝效率。生物质气化气主要成分为H₂、CH₄和CO,其中H₂和CH₄对温度窗的作用明显,CO的效果较小。各种气体成分主要通过促进OH基元生成来促进相对较低温度下脱硝反应过程的进行。     

CO_2气氛下劣质煤气化及动力学特性实验研究

利用综合热分析仪以非等温热重法研究了升温速率及粒径对于两种劣质煤粉在CO2气氛下气化反应特性的影响规律,考察了灰分对于两种劣质煤气化反应性的影响,并采用均相反应模型(HM),利用Freeman-Carroll法计算拟合得到各条件下气化反应动力学参数。结果表明:两种劣质煤CO2气化反应级数都是1.0级。反应条件对两种煤样的反应活化能产生了相似的影响:CO2气氛下,在900～1 300℃的样品气化反应区间,当其它条件不变时,随着煤样粒径由150～400μm减小到0～75μm,两种劣质煤样表观活化能呈明显下降趋势;而随着升温速率由30℃/min降至10℃/min,两种煤样反应活化能则在上升。在不同样品粒径及升温速率下,两种煤粉的气化活化能和对应的指前因子之间存在着动力学补偿效应。     

生物质半焦气化反应动力学参数研究

为了得到升温速率对生物质半焦气化反应的影响。利用热重分析仪对玉米秸秆半焦和松木半焦在不同的升温速率(10、20、40、50℃/min)条件下的反应进行研究,得到这两种半焦TG曲线和DTG曲线,曲线表明反应速率会随着升温速率增大而加快。采用未反应收缩核模型得到反应机理函数,分析计算动力学参数。分析发现,随着升温速率的增大,生物质焦发生CO2气化反应的活化能也增加,同时指前因子也随之增大。     

生物质半焦CO2气化反应动力学研究

采用热天平研究生物质半焦CO2气化反应动力学特性。考察半焦粒径、热解制焦温度以及热解制焦气氛对气化反应碳转化率的影响。采用随机孔模型、未反应芯缩核模型和混合模型对生物质半焦气化反应速率随碳转化率变化的趋势进行拟合,并求出半焦气化的动力学参数,结果表明随机孔模型的拟合效果最好。     

烟煤煤焦等温CO2气化动力学模型研究

在建立的化学反应动力学控制实验条件下利用自建固定床实验台研究了烟煤煤焦等温CO2气化反应特性。采用均相模型、未反应收缩核模型和修正体积模型计算得到气化反应活化能分别为147.7kJ/mol、102.9kJ/mol和155.5kJ/mol。利用等转化率法避开反应机理函数的选择,计算得到反应活化能为144.1～166.0kJ/mol。通过比对不同模型相关系数大小以及与等转化率法计算所得活化能范围符合程度相结合的方法,确定均相模型和修正体积模型为最佳动力学模型;根据修正体积模型中经验常数b≈1,可认为修正体积模型与均相模型为同一模型。因此确定烟煤煤焦CO2气化反应最佳动力学模型为均相反应模型。     

Detailed kinetic analysis and modelling of the dry gasification reaction of olive kernel and lignite coal chars

The dry gasification process of solid fuels is a promising pathway to mitigate and utilize captured CO₂ emissions toward syngas generation with tailored composition for several downstream energy conversion and chemical production processes. In the present work, comprehensive kinetic analysis and reaction modelling studies were carried out for olive kernel and lignite coal chars gasification reaction using pure CO₂ as gasifying agent. Chars reactivity and kinetics of the gasification reactions were thoroughly examined by thermogravimetric analysis at three different heating rates and correlated with their physicochemical properties. The reactivity of olive kernel char, as determined by the mean gasification reactivity and the comprehensive gasification characteristic index, S, was almost three times higher compared to that of the lignite coal char. It was disclosed that the fixed carbon content and alkali index (AI) have a major impact on the reactivity of chars. The activation energy, E_a, estimated by three different model-free kinetic methods was ranged between 140 and 170 kJ/mol and 250–350 kJ/mol for the olive kernel and lignite coal chars, respectively. The activation energy values for the lignite coal char significantly varied with carbon conversion degree, whereas this was not the case for olive kernel char, where the activation energy remained essentially unmodified throughout the whole carbon conversion range. Finally, the combined Malek and Coats-Rendfrem method was applied to unravel the mechanism of chars-CO₂ gasification reaction. It was found that the olive kernel char-CO₂ gasification can be described with a 2D-diffusion mechanism function (D2) whereas the lignite coal char-CO₂ gasification follows a second order chemical reaction mechanism function (F2).     

Impacts of char structure evolution and inherent alkali and alkaline earth metallic species catalysis on reactivity during the coal char gasification with CO2/H2O

In this work, we studied the effects of char structural evolution and alkali and alkaline earth metallic species (AAEMs) catalysis on the reactivity during the char gasification with CO₂, H₂O, and their mixture. The gasified chars with different carbon conversion levels were prepared, and their physicochemical structures were characterized via nitrogen adsorption and FT‐Raman techniques. The concentrations of AAEMs in different modes were obtained by the sequential chemical extraction method. The reactivities of the raw and gasified chars were analyzed by the thermogravimetric analysis. The gasification atmospheres had varied effects on the physicochemical structure of coal char. The gasified char obtained in the CO₂ atmosphere had a lower aromatic condensation degree compared with that obtained in the H₂O atmosphere, irrespective of the temperature. The impact of the atmospheres on the specific surface area of the char varied with the temperature because H₂O and CO₂ have different routes of development of pore structure with coal char. A large specific surface area facilitates the exposure and dispersion of more AAEMs on the surface of the channel, which is conducive to their contact with the gasification agent to play the catalytic role. Thus, the reactivity of the gasified char is well correlated with its specific surface area at different gasification temperatures. In the absence of AAEMs, the chemical structure of coal char becomes the dominant factor affecting the reactivity.     

Gasification reactivity and synergistic effect of conventional and microwave pyrolysis derived algae chars in CO2 atmosphere

This research focuses on the isothermal and non-isothermal CO₂ gasification of an algal (Chlorella) char prepared via two different thermal processing systems, i.e. conventional and microwave-assisted pyrolysis. It was found that chars prepared via microwave irradiation showed higher CO₂ gasification reactivity than that of chars prepared via the conventional method. Meanwhile, the activation energy of microwave char was found to be 127.89 kJ/mol, which was 46.3 kJ/mol lower than that of conventional char, indicating improved reactivity of microwave char. The systematic characterisation of both conventional and microwave chars shows that the higher reactivity of microwave char could be attributed to its large BET surface area, low crystalline index and high active sites. In addition, it was found that microwave heating contributed to high reactivity of chars through generating large amount of primary char, the formation of hot spot and high specific surface area and pore volume. Results of co-gasification under isothermal conditions revealed the existence of greater synergistic effects between coal char and microwave algae char than those of coal char and conventional algae char. Furthermore, based on the relative Rs (average gasification rate), a novel index proposed to quantify the interactions in co-gasification process, Australian coal char/microwave assisted char blend experienced 10% higher interactions compared to Australian coal char/conventional assisted char blend.     

炭化气氛对黑液煤浆及不同煤种气化反应特性的影响

煤气化前阶段的炭化气氛(温度、时间)影响到煤焦的气化反应特性.采用不同的炭化温度和炭化时间制备了黑液水煤浆、普通水煤浆以及其他5种煤的焦样,得到了各种煤焦气化反应的碳转化率;同时,通过扫描电子显微镜分析手段鉴别焦炭表面孔隙分布情况.试验结果表明,相同炭化气氛下得到的7种不同煤焦中,黄陵煤焦的气化活性最高,说明煤化程度越高反应性越低;由于黑液中有机物和无机物钠盐的影响,黑液水煤浆焦的气化特性高于普通水煤浆焦和新汶煤焦.煤焦的气化反应性,不仅与煤阶有关,还和煤焦中含氧官能团和无机化合物的含量有关,同时煤浆中外在添加的无机物组分也影响到煤焦的气化活性.     

Kinetics of CO2 gasification of biomass char in granulated blast furnace slag

The CO₂ gasification reactions of biomass char in granulated BFS (blast furnace slag) were isothermally investigated using a thermogravimetric analyzer with the temperature ranging from 1173 K to 1323 K. The effects of temperature, biomass type and granulated BFS on the kinetic characterizations of CO₂ gasification of biomass char were illuminated. The kinetic mechanism models and parameters were obtained through a novel two-step calculation method. The results indicated that the CO₂ gasification reactivity of biomass char as conversion and gasification index increased with the increase of temperature and it could be promoted through granulated BFS. The CO₂ gasification reactivity of CS (cornstalk) char with lower alkali index was lower than that of PS (peanut shell) char. The A₄ model (Avrami-Erofeev (m = 4) model) and A₃ model (Avrami-Erofeev (m = 3) model) were demonstrated as the best appropriate models for CO₂ gasification of CS char and PS char, respectively. The gasification activation energy of CS char ranging from 155.08 to 160.48 kJ/mol was higher than that of PS char whether with or without granulated BFS. Granulated BFS could decrease the activation energy of CO₂ gasification of char at any biomass type.     

热解条件对生物质焦气化活性的影响及等温气化动力学参数求解方法

生物质气化是生物质利用研究的一个重点。生物质气化包含生物质的热解和热解所得焦炭的气化两个过程。不同的热解条件将得到具有不同气化活性的生物质焦炭,不同热解条件制取的焦炭的动力学参数也不相同。本文主要概述了热解条件对生物质焦气化活性的影响。同时基于阿伦尼乌斯公式介绍了生物质焦等温气化动力学参数的两种获取方法,非等转化率法是通过选择动力学模型中的结构因子f(x) 来获取动力学参数,而等转化率法是通过避开选择动力学模型中的结构因子f(x) 来获取动力学参数。基于简单碰撞理论提出了获取等温气化动力学参数的新方法,对阿伦尼乌斯公式中的指数项、指前因子A提出了明确的物理意义。基于简单碰撞理论的等温求解气化动力学参数方法类似于基于阿伦尼乌斯公式的等温求解气化动力学参数方法。     

浑源煤焦CO_2气化反应的影响因素及动力学特性分析

研究了热解温度、热解时间以及气化温度对浑源煤焦CO2气化反应的影响,并获得了气化反应的动力学模型.结果表明：浑源煤焦的气化活性随热解温度的提高而降低;每个热解温度都对应着一个最佳热解时间,且存在最佳热解时间随温度升高而缩短的趋势;提高气化温度能够显著提高煤焦的气化反应性能,气化温度对气化反应的影响大于热解温度的影响;低温度煤焦的气化活性随气化温度的提高而增加更为剧烈;900℃及以上的高温使活性点数增加,从而使煤焦间的活性差距分布均匀;浑源煤焦的气化反应适宜用体积模型来描述,所求取的动力学参数之间存在补偿效应,其等动力学温度约为1 199.6℃.     

Kinetic characteristics of in-situ char-steam gasification following pyrolysis of a demineralized coal

This study aims to examine the char-steam reactions in-situ, following the pyrolysis process of a demineralized coal in a micro fluidized bed reactor, with particular focuses on gas release and its kinetics characteristics. The main experimental variables were temperatures (925 °C?1075 °C) and steam concentrations (15%–35% H₂O), and the combination of pyrolysis and subsequent gasification in one experiment was achieved switching the atmosphere from pure argon to steam and argon mixture. The results indicate that when temperature was higher than 975 °C, the absolute carbon conversion rate during the char gasification could easily reach 100%. When temperature was 1025 °C and 1075 °C, the carbon conversion rate changed little with steam concentration increasing from 25% to 35%. The activation energy calculated from shrinking core model and random pore model was all between 186 and 194 kJ/mol, and the fitting accuracy of shrinking core model was higher than that of the random pore model in this study. The char reactivity from demineralized coal pyrolysis gradually worsened with decreasing temperature and steam partial pressure. The range of reaction order of steam gasification was 0.49–0.61. Compared to raw coal, the progress of water gas shift reaction (CO + H₂O ? CO₂ + H₂) was hindered during the steam gasification of char obtained from the demineralized coal pyrolysis. Meanwhile, the gas content from the char gasification after the demineralized coal pyrolysis showed a low sensitivity to the change in temperature.