Urease and nitrification inhibitors to reduce emissions of CH4 and N2O in rice production

Strategies used to reduce emissions of N₂O and CH₄ in rice production normally include irrigation management and fertilization. To date, little information has been published on the measures that can simultaneously reduce both emissions. Effects of application of a urease inhibitor, hydroquinone (HQ), and a nitrification inhibitor, dicyandiamide (DCD) together with urea (U) on N₂O and CH₄ emission from rice growing were studied in pot experiments. These fertilization treatments were carried out in the presence and absence of wheat straw, applied to the soil surface. Without wheat straw addition, in all treatments with inhibitor(s) the emission of N₂O and CH₄ was significantly reduced, as compared with the treatment whereby only urea was applied (control). Especially for the U+HQ+DCD treatment, the total emission of N₂O and CH₄ was about 1/3 and 1/2 of that in the control, respectively. In the presence of wheat straw, the total N₂O emission from the U+HQ+DCD treatment was about 1/2 of that from the control. The total CH₄ emission was less influenced. Wheat straw addition, however, induced a substantial increase in emissions of N₂O and CH₄. Hence, simultaneous application of organic materials with a high C/N ratio and N-fertilizer (e.g. urea) is not a suitable method to reduce the N₂O and CH₄ emission. Application of HQ+DCD together with urea seemed to improve the rice growth and to reduce both emissions. The NO₃ ^–-N content of the rice plants and denitrification of (NO₃ ^–+NO₂ ^–)-N might contribute to the N₂O emission from flooded rice fields.     

Effects of fertiliser type and the presence or absence of plants on nitrous oxide emissions from irrigated soils

Nitrous oxide (N₂O) emissions and denitrification losses from an irrigated sandy loam soil amended with composted municipal solid waste (MSW), sheep manure (SM), surface applied pig slurry (SPS), incorporated pig slurry (IPS) or urea (U) were studied under Mediterranean conditions. We quantified emissions, in both the presence and absence of maize and N₂O production, via denitrification and nitrification pathways using varying concentrations of acetylene. Discounting the N₂O lost in the Control, the percentages of N₂O lost in relation to the total N applied were greater for urea (1.80%) than for MSW (0.50%), SM (0.46%), SPS (1.02%) or IPS (1.27%). In general, plots treated with organic fertilisers emitted higher amounts of N₂O when under maize than bare soil plots. On the other hand, greater denitrification losses were also recorded for plots in the absence of plants (between 9.7 and 29.3 kg N₂O-N ha⁻¹) than for areas with plants (between 7.1 and 24.1 kg N₂O-N ha⁻¹). The proportion of N₂O produced via denitrification was greater from fertiliser treatments than for the controls and also greater without plants (between 66 and 91 % of the N₂O emitted) than with plants (between 48 and 81%).     

Effect of the new nitrification inhibitor DMPP in comparison to DCD on nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions and methane (CH4) oxidation during 3 years of repeated applications in field experiments

In a 3-year field experiment the effect of the new nitrification inhibitor DMPP (3,4-dimethyl pyrazole phosphate, trade name ENTEC) on the release of N₂O and on methane oxidation was examined in comparison to dicyandiamide (DCD). Soil samples were analysed for the concentrations of ammonium, nitrite, nitrate and for the degradation kinetics of DMPP as well as DCD. DMPP decreased the release of N₂O by 41% (1997), 47% (1998) and 53% (1999) (with an average of 49%) while DCD reduced N₂O emissions by 30% (1997), 22% (1998) and 29% (1999) (with an average of 26%), respectively. Both nitrification inhibitors (NI) failed to affect methane oxidation negatively. The plots that received DCD or DMPP, respectively, even seem to function as enhanced sinks for atmospheric methane. DMPP apparently stimulated methane oxidation by ca. 28% in comparison to the control. The concentrations of ammonium remained unaffected by nitrification inhibitors whereas the amounts of nitrite diminished in the plots treated with DCD by 25% and with DMPP by 20%, respectively. Nitrate concentrations in soil were in both NI treatments 23% lower than in the control. DMPP and DCD did not affect the yields of summer barley, maize and winter wheat significantly. Dicyandiamide was mineralized more rapidly than DMPP (data for the cropping season in 1997 as an example). This revised version was published online in August 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Nitrous oxide production from soil experiments: denitrification prevails over nitrification

Nitrous oxide is produced in soils and sediments essentially through the processes of nitrification and denitrification, although several rival processes could be competing. This study was undertaken in order to better understand the controlling factors of nitrification, denitrification and associated N₂O production as well as the contribution of these two processes to the average N₂O production by soils and sediments. With this aim, soil and sediment samples were taken in contrasting periods and different land use types, each time at different depths (upper and lower soil horizons). They were incubated in separate batches in specific conditions to promote denitrification and nitrification: (1) a complete anaerobic environment adding KNO₃ for the denitrification assay and (2) an aerobic environment (21 % O₂) with addition of NH₄Cl for the nitrification assay. Potentials of nitrification and denitrification were determined by the rates of nitrate either reduced (for denitrification) or produced (for nitrification). Overall, denitrification potential varied from 70 to 2,540 ng NO ₃ ^— -N g^?1 dry soil h^?1 and nitrification potential from 30 to 1,150 ng NO₃ ^?-N g^?1 dry soil h^?1. Nitrous oxide production by denitrification was significantly (P < 0.05) greater in topsoils (10–30 cm) than in subsoils (90–110 cm), ranging, respectively, from 26 to 250 ng N₂O-N g^?1 dry soil h^?1 versus 1.5 to 31 ng N₂O-N g^?1 dry soil h^?1, i.e., a mean 19.5 versus. 6.0 % of the NO₃ ^? denitrified for the upper and lower horizons, respectively. Considering the N₂O production in relation with the nitrate production (e.g., nitrification), no significant difference (P < 0.05) was found in the soil profile, which ranged from 0.03 to 6 ng N₂O-N g^?1 dry soil h^?1. This production accounts for 0.21 and 0.16 % of the mean of the NO₃ ^? produced for the top and subsoils, respectively. On the basis of the average production by both top- and subsoils, N₂O production by denitrification is clearly greater than by nitrification under the measurement conditions used in this study, from 30- to 100-fold higher. Such a high potential of N₂O emission must be taken into account when reducing nitrate contamination by increasing denitrification is planned as a curative measure, e.g. in rehabilitation/construction of wetlands.     

Nitrogen fertilizer value of activated sewage derived protein: Effect of environment and nitrification inhibitor on NO 3 - release,soil microbial activity and yield of summer cabbage

Yield response of summer cabbage (Brassica oleracea varcapitata cv. Hispi F₁) to N applied as organic (activated sewage sludge derived protein [Protox] and dried blood) and inorganic (ammonium nitrate, ammonium sulphate, sodium nitrate and urea) fertilizers was compared in relation to the N availability characteristics of the materials. Effects of the nitrification inhibitor dicyandiamide (DCD) on N release, crop yield and N status were also assessed. In addition CO₂ efflux was measured from amended soil to determine effects of fertilizer application on soil microbial activity. The organic N sources were mineralized quickly on application to soil and exhibited similar patterns of NH₄-N depletion and NO₃-N accumulation as functions of thermal-time as with mineral fertilizers. However, the yield response to organic N was marginally smaller (though not significantly) compared with mineral forms; probably because less N was released to the crop. This was reflected in smaller total N concentrations and N recoveries in plants supplied with organic fertilizer. Applied DCD increased the thermal-time for complete nitrification of NH₄-N sources and raised the total N content of the crop, but had no overall effect on crop growth. In contrast to inorganic N sources which generally reduced CO₂ efflux from soil, application of protein-based fertilizers increased the rate of soil microbial activity directly by raising substrate availability. Sewage sludge derived protein provided an effective alternative to mineral fertilizers for the nutrition of summer cabbage whilst minimising stress of the soil environment which may occur following the application of conventional forms of inorganic N to the soil.     

Effects of type and amount of applied nitrogen fertilizer on nitrous oxide fluxes from intensively managed grassland

Five field experiments and one greenhouse experiment were carried out to assess the effects of nitrogen (N) fertilizer type and the amount of applied N fertilizer on nitrous oxide (N₂O) emission from grassland. During cold and dry conditions in early spring, emission of N₂O from both ammonium (NH ₄ ⁺ ) and nitrate (NO ₃ ^– ) containing fertilizers applied to a clay soil were relatively small, i.e. less than 0.1% of the N applied. Emission of N₂O and total denitrification losses from NO ₃ ^– containing fertilizers were large after application to a poorly drained sand soil during a wet spring. A total of 5–12% and 8–14% of the applied N was lost as N₂O and via denitrification, respectively. Emissions of N₂O and total denitrification losses from NH ₄ ⁺ fertilizers and cattle slurry were less than 2% of the N applied. Addition of the nitrification inhibitor dicyandiamide (DCD) reduced N₂O fluxes from ammonium sulphate (AS). However, the effect of DCD to reduce total N₂O emission from AS was much smaller than the effect of using NH ₄ ⁺ fertilizer instead of NO ₃ ^– fertilizer, during wet conditions. The greenhouse study showed that a high groundwater level favors production of N₂O from NO ₃ ^– fertilizers but not from NH ₄ ⁺ fertilizers. Inereasing calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) application increased the emitted N₂O on grassland from 0.6% of the fertilizer application rate for a dressing of 50 kg N ha^–1 to 3.1% for a dressing of 300 kg N ha^–1. In another experiment, N₂O emission increased proportionally with increasing N rate. The results indicate that there is scope for reducing N₂O emission from grasslands by choosing the N fertilizer type depending on the soil moisture status. Avoiding excessive N application rates may also minimize N₂O emission from intensively managed grasslands.     

Can nitrogen fertiliser and nitrification inhibitor management influence N2O losses from high rainfall cropping systems in South Eastern Australia?

Nitrous oxide (N₂O) is a potent greenhouse gas released from high rainfall cropping soils, but the role of management in its abatement remains unclear in these environments. To quantify the relative influence of management, nitrogen (N) fertiliser and soil nitrification inhibitor was applied to separate but paired raised bed and conventionally flat field experiments in south west Victoria, to measure emissions and income from wheat and canola planted 2 and 3 years after conversion from a long-term pasture. Management included four different rates of N fertiliser, top-dressed with and without the nitrification inhibitor Dicyandiamide (DCD), which was applied in solution to the soil in the second year of experimentation. Crop biomass, grain yield, soil mineral N, soil temperature and soil water and N₂O flux were measured. Static chamber methodology was used to identify relative differences in N₂O loss between management. In the second crop (wheat) following conversion, N₂O losses were up to 72 % lower (P < 0.05) in the furrows, receiving the lower rate of N fertiliser compared with the highest rate, with less frequent reductions observed in the third crop (canola); losses of N₂O from the beds was unaffected by N rate, perhaps from nitrate leakage into the adjacent furrow of the raised bed experiment. On the nearby flat experiment, nitrate leaching may have diminished the effects of N rate and DCD on N₂O flux. Furthermore the extra N did not significantly increase grain yield in either the wheat or canola crops on both experiments. The application of DCD in the canola crop temporarily reduced (P < 0.05) N₂O production by up to 84 % from the beds, 83 % in the adjacent furrows and 75 % on the flat experiment. Grain yield was not significantly (P < 0.001) affected however, canola income was reduced by $1407/ha and $1252/ha, compared with no addition of inhibitor on the respective bed and flat experiments. Although N₂O fluxes are driven by environmental episodic events, management will play a role in N₂O abatement. However, DCD currently appears economically unfeasible and matching N fertiliser supply to meet crop demand appears a better option for minimising N₂O losses from high rainfall cropping systems.     

Laboratory assessment of the effect of cattle slurry pre-treatment on organic N degradation after soil application and N<Subscript>2</Subscript>O and N<Subscript>2</Subscript> emissions

Slurry separation using mechanical and chemical methods is one of the options considered to solve problems of slurry management at the farm scale. The fractions obtained with such treatments have distinct compositions, which allow different options for their utilization (composting, direct application, and fertigation). In this study, four fractions of slurry were obtained using a combined treatment system including slurry treatment with a screw press separator (solid and liquid fractions) followed by sedimentation with the addition of Polyacrylamide (PAM) (PAM-Supernatant and PAM-Sediment) to the LF. These fractions were then incorporated into arable soil under controlled laboratory conditions and the organic N degradation from each treatment was followed for 94 days. Total N emissions (N₂O + N₂) as well as the sources of the N emissions (nitrification or denitrification) were also studied during this period. Results showed that the slurry fractions (SFs) had distinct behavior relative to the whole slurry (WS), namely in terms of N degradation in soil, where N mineralization was observed only in the WS treatment whereas N immobilization occurred in the other treatments. In terms of N₂O emissions, higher losses, expressed as a percentage of the total N added, occurred from the LF treatments (liquid, PAM-Supernatant and PAM-Sediment). This work indicates that the slurry treatment by mechanical and chemical separation may be a good option for slurry management at the farm scale since it allows greater utilization of the different fractions with a small effect on N₂O emissions after SFs’ application to soil.     

Contribution of nitrification and denitrification to N2O production in peat, clay and loamy sand soils under different soil moisture conditions

Agricultural soils are a significant source of nitrous oxide (N₂O). Since mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions is needed in all sectors of society, it is important to identify the processes producing N₂O and the factors affecting the production rates in agricultural soils. This study aimed to elucidate the N₂O production in peat, clay and loamy sand at four different soil moisture conditions (40, 60, 80 and 100% Water Filled Pore Space). The ace­tylene inhibition technique was used to evaluate the contribution of nitrification to N₂O production. Nitrous oxide production responded markedly to soil moisture in all three soils. The highest N₂O production, measured at the wettest soils (100% WFPS), was up to four orders of magnitude higher than that at the dry soils (40% WFPS). In dry conditions N₂O production decreased in the order of peat > clay > loamy sand, while in wet conditions the highest N₂O production was measured in loamy sand, then in peat, and the lowest in clay soils. Nitrification was the dominant N₂O producing process in all the soils at 60% WFPS. In the sandy soil 70% of the total N₂O production originated from nitrification, while in the peat soil most of the total N₂O production originated from denitrification. Data on processes producing N₂O in agricultural soils are needed to develop process-based models that could reduce the uncertainty of the emission estimates in greenhouse gas inventories.     

生活污水不同生物脱氮过程中N_2O产量及控制

利用好氧-缺氧SBR反应器和全程曝气SBBR反应器处理生活污水,分别实现了全程、短程和同步硝化反硝化脱氮过程,研究了不同脱氮过程中N2O的产生及释放情况,同时考察了不同DO条件下同步脱氮效率及N2O产生量。结果表明,全程、短程生物脱氮过程中N2O主要产生于硝化过程,反硝化过程有利于降低系统N2O产量。全程、短程、同步硝化反硝化脱氮过程中N2O产量分别为4.67、6.48和0.35mg.L-1。硝化过程中NO2-N的积累是导致系统N2O产生的主要原因。部分AOB在限氧条件下以NH4+-N作为电子供体,NO2-N作为电子受体进行反硝化,最终产物是N2O。不同DO条件下同步硝化反硝化过程中N2O的产生表明:控制SBBR系统中DO浓度达到稳定的同步脱氮效率可使系统N2O产量最低。     

Effects of nitrification inhibitors and time and rate of slurry and fertilizer N application on silage maize yield and losses to the environment

Field experiments with silage maize during eight years on a sandy soil in The Netherlands, showed that dicyandiamide (DCD) addition to autumn-applied cattle slurry retarded nitrification, thus reducing nitrate losses during winter. Spring-applied slurry without DCD, however, was on average associated with even lower losses and higher maize dry matter yields.Economically optimum supplies of mineral N in the upper 0.6 m soil layer in spring (EOSMN), amounted to 130–220 kg ha^–1. Year to year variation of EOSMN could not be attributed to crop demand only. According to balance sheet calculations on control plots, apparent N mineralization between years varied from 0.36 to 0.94 kg ha^–1 d^–1. On average, forty percent of the soil mineral N (SMN) supply in spring, was lost during the growing season. Hence, the amounts of residual soil mineral N (RSMN) were lower than expected. Multiple regression with SMN in spring, N crop uptake and cumulative rainfall as explanatory variables, could account for 79 percent of the variation in RSMN.Postponement of slurry applications to spring and limiting N inputs to economically optimum rates, were insufficient measures to keep the nitrate concentration in groundwater below the EC level for drinking water.     

Sources of nitrous oxide in soils

Research to identify sources of nitrous oxide (N₂O) in soils has indicated that most, if not all, of the N₂O evolved from soils is produced by biological processes and that little, if any, is produced by chemical processes such as chemodenitrification. Early workers assumed that denitrification was the only biological process responsible for N₂O production in soils and that essentially all of the N₂O evolved from soils was produced through reduction of nitrate by denitrifying microorganisms under anaerobic conditions. It is now well established, however, that nitrifying microorganisms contribute significantly to emissions of N₂O from soils and that most of the N₂O evolved from aerobic soils treated with ammonium or ammonium-yielding fertilizers such as urea is produced during oxidation of ammonium to nitrate by these microorganisms. Support for the conclusion that chemoautotrophic nitrifiers such as Nitrosomonas europaea contribute significantly to production of N₂O in soils treated with N fertilizers has been provided by studies showing that N₂O emissions from such soils can be greatly reduced through addition of nitrification inhibitors such as nitrapyrin, which retard oxidation of ammonium by chemoautotrophic nitrifiers but do not retard reduction of nitrate by denitrifying microorganisms. This revised version was published online in August 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Turnover of15N ammonium sulfate with dicyandiamide under aerobic and anaerobic soil conditions

The influence of the nitrification inhibitor dicyandiamide (DCD) on the turnover of¹⁵N-labelled ammonium sulfate (AS) was investigated in two soils under aerobic and waterlogged conditions. Nitrification of ammonium sulfate was markedly inhibited by addition of DCD in both soils. Up to 45% of the supplied N was transformed into a non-extractable N form, which only slowly released nitrogen over 147 or 264 days. This immobilization was higher in the presence of DCD than without DCD. In all aerobic experiments, the recovery was 100% ± max. 2.4%, indicating that no gaseous losses of N occurred.If aerobic preincubation of 28 or 42 days was followed by water-logging with H₂O or a solution of glucose, considerable N losses occurred only in presence of the carbohydrate. DCD retarded nitrification and thus reduced losses by denitrification from 61 to 15%.DCD application resulted in an increased immobilization of labelled N into the non-exchangeable soil N fraction. This amounted to more than 50% of the applied N, compared to 39% without DCD.The late Dr. Klaus Vilsmeier, a very dedicated and talented young scientist, died before he was able to finish completely the revised version of this article. We will always keep him in our minds and kindly remember his kind personality as well as his sense of humour and justice. Prof. Dr. Heiner Goldbach on behalf of all members of the department.     

N2O and NO emissions from different N sources and under a range of soil water contents

Emissions of nitrous oxide (N₂O) and nitric oxide (NO) have been identified as one of the most important sources of atmospheric pollution from grasslands. Soils are major sources for the production of N₂O and NO, which are by-products or intermediate products of microbial nitrification and denitrification processes. Some studies have tried to evaluate the importance of denitrification or nitrification in the formation of N₂O or NO but there are few that have considered emissions of both gases as affected by a wide range of different factors. In this study, the importance of a number of factors (soil moisture, fertiliser type and temperature) was determined for N₂O and NO emissions. Nitrous oxide and NO evolution in time and the possibility of using the ratio NO:N₂O as an indicator for the processes involved were also explored. Dinitrogen (N₂) and ammonia (NH₃) emissions were estimated and a mass balance for N fluxes was performed. Nitrous oxide and NO were produced by nitrification and denitrification in soils fertilised with and by denitrification in soils fertilised with . Water content in the soil was the most important factor affecting N₂O and NO emissions. Our N₂O and NO data were fitted to quadratic (r=0.8) and negative exponential (r=0.7) equations, respectively. A long lag phase was observed for the N₂O emitted from soils fertilised with (denitrification), which was not observed for the soils fertilised with (nitrification) and was possibly due to a greater inhibiting effect of low temperatures on microbial activity controlling denitrification rather than on nitrification. The use of the NO:N₂O ratio as a possible indicator of denitrification or nitrification in the formation of N₂O and NO was discounted for soils fertilised with . The N mass balance indicated that about 50 kg N ha⁻¹ was immobilised by microorganisms and/or taken up by plant roots, and that most of the losses ocurred in wet soils (WFPS >60%) as N₂ and NH₃ losses (>55%).     

Mitigation of N<Subscript>2</Subscript>O and CH<Subscript>4</Subscript> Emission from Rice and Wheat Cropping Systems Using Dicyandiamide and Hydroquinone

Agriculture contributes considerably to the emission of greenhouse gases, such as N₂O and CH₄. Here we summarize results from previous pot experiments assessing the effectiveness of urease and nitrification inhibitors reducing both N₂O and CH₄ emissions from wheat and rice cropping systems fertilized with urea (U). For the wheat cropping system, using a cambisol, we observed that the application of U with hydroquinone (HQ, a urease inhibitor), U with dicyandiamide (DCD, a nitrification inhibitor) and U with HQ plus DCD decreased the N₂O emissions by 11.4, 22.3 and 25.1%, respectively. For the rice copping system, using a luvisol, we found that the application of U with HQ, U with DCD and U with HQ plus DCD decreased N₂O emissions by 10.6, 47.0 and 62.3%, respectively, and CH₄ emissions by 30.1, 53.1 and 58.3%, respectively. In terms of total global warming potential (GWP) a reduction of 61.2% could be realized via the combined addition of HQ and DCD. The addition of wheat straw reduced the activity of HQ and DCD in the rice cropping experiments. In terms of total GWP only a reduction of 30.7% could be achieved. In general, both in upland and flooded conditions, the application of HQ and DCD alone was less effective than HQ in combination with DCD, but not significantly for U plus DCD treatment. Our observations may be further constrained, however, by practical, economic or social problems and should therefore be tested at the scale of a region (e.g. a watershed) and related to an integrated abatement of agricultural N losses.     

Nitrous oxide emission as affected by liming an acidic mineral soil used for arable agriculture

The effect of liming an acidic mineral soil (Dystric Nitosol from southern China), used for arable agriculture, on N₂O emission was studied in an incubation experiment. After the soil pH had been raised from pH 4.4 to 5.2, 6.7 and 8.1, soil samples were either amended with NH₄ ⁺ and incubated aerobically, favoring nitrification or, after application of NO₃ ^–, the incubation took place under anaerobic conditions, favoring denitrification. Gas sampling for N₂O determination and soil analyses were performed at regular intervals up to 13 days. Under nitrification conditions only small N₂O emission rates were observed (max. 6 g N kg^–1 d^–1) with significant differences between high and low pH values during the first 2 days of incubation. The nitrifying activity was low, even with high pH, and this, together with good aeration conditions, could partly explain the small N₂O evolution. During denitrification, however, cumulative N₂O emissions reached much higher values (1600 g N kg^–1 in comparison to 40 g N kg^–1 under nitrification conditions). N₂O emission during denitrification was significantly enhanced by increasing soil pH. Under alkaline conditions (pH 8.1) a large nitrite accumulation occurred, which was in line with the highest nitrate reductase activity determined in this treatment. The limited availability of organic carbon is probably the main reason for the absence of further reduction of NO₂ ^– to N₂O or N₂. At pH 6.7 the total N₂O emission was slightly higher than at pH 8.1, although the start of pronounced emissions was retarded and only small amounts of NO₂ ^– accumulated. Acid soil conditions caused either negligible (pH 4.4) or only small (pH 5.2) N₂O emissions. It can be concluded that these kinds of soil, used alternatively for production of upland crops or paddy rice, are prone to high N₂O emissions after flooding, particularly under neutral to alkaline conditions. In order to avoid major N₂O evolution and accumulation of nitrite, which can be leached into groundwater, the pH should not be raised to values above 5.5–6.     

Relationship Between Gross Nitrogen Cycling and Nitrous Oxide Emissionin Grass-clover Pasture

Replacement of high-input N fertilized pastures with low-input grass-legume pastures may provide a mitigation option to reduce agricultural N₂O emissions. This study examined the relationship between N-cycling rates and N₂O production and evolution from the root zone of grass-clover pastures of various ages (production year 1, 2 and 8). The experimental approach included cross-labelling pasture monoliths with ¹⁵N-enriched substrates to identify sources of N₂O, in combination with assessment of gross N mineralization and nitrification. Nitrous oxide emissions were generally low, fluctuating between 82 and 136μg N₂O–N m⁻² d⁻¹, independent of pasture age. The ¹⁵N labelling indicated that at least 50% of the N₂O was derived from the soil NH₄⁺ pool, approaching 100% in June. In the two year old pasture the NH₄⁺ pool contributions to N₂O emissions varied significantly with sampling time. Emission rates of N₂O correlated positively with soil NH₄⁺ concentrations and the NH₄⁺ supply as expressed by gross mineralization. The N₂O emissions showed a significant inverse relationship with soil NO₃⁻, but was not correlated with the supply of NO₃⁻ as expressed by gross nitrification. The ratio N₂O vs. nitrification averaged 0.05% (range 0.004 to 0.29%) and varied with sampling time showing the lowest value in wet soil conditions.     

Fungal and bacterial contributions to codenitrification emissions of N<Subscript>2</Subscript>O and N<Subscript>2</Subscript> following urea deposition to soil

Grazed pastures contribute significantly to anthropogenic emissions of N₂O but the respective contributions of archaea, bacteria and fungi to codenitrification in such systems is unresolved. This study examined the relative contributions of bacteria and fungi to rates of denitrification and codenitrification under a simulated ruminant urine event. It was hypothesised that fungi would be primarily responsible for both codenitrification and total N₂O and N₂ emissions. The effects of bacterial (streptomycin), fungal (cycloheximide), and combined inhibitor treatments were measured in a laboratory mesocosm experiment, on soil that had received ¹⁵N labelled urea. Soil inorganic-N concentrations, N₂O and N₂ gas fluxes were measured over 51 days. On Days 42 and 51, when nitrification was actively proceeding in the positive control, the inhibitor treatments inhibited nitrification as evidenced by increased soil NH ₄ ⁺ -N concentrations and decreased soil NO ₂ ^? -N and NO ₃ ^? -N concentrations. Codenitrification was observed to contribute to total fluxes of both N₂O (≥ 33%) and N₂ (≥ 3%) in urine-amended grassland soils. Cycloheximide inhibition decreased NH ₄ ⁺ –¹⁵N enrichment and reduced N₂O fluxes while reducing the contribution of codenitrification to total N₂O fluxes by ≥ 66 and ≥ 42%, respectively. Thus, given archaea do not respond to significant urea deposition, it is proposed that fungi, not bacteria, dominated total N₂O fluxes, and the codenitrification N₂O fluxes, from a simulated urine amended pasture soil.     

Measurement of nitrous oxide and di-nitrogen emissions from agricultural soils

Nitrous oxide can be produced during nitrification, denitrification, dissimilatory reduction of NO ₃ ^- to NH ₄ ⁺ and chemo-denitrification. Since soils are a mosaic of aerobic and anaerobic zones, it is likely that multiple processes are contributing simultaneously to N₂O production in a soil profile. The N₂O produced by all processes may mix to form one pool before being reduced to N₂ by denitrification. Reliable methods are needed for measuring the fluxes of N₂O and N₂ simultaneously from agricultural soils. The C₂H₂ inhibition and ¹⁵N gas-flux methods are suitable for use in undisturbed soils in the field. The main disadvantage of C₂H₂ is that as well as blocking N₂O reductase, it also blocks nitrification and dissimilatory reduction of NO ₃ ^- to NH ₄ ⁺ . Potentially the ¹⁵ N gas-flux method can give reliable measurements of the fluxes of N₂O and N₂ when all N transformation processes proceed naturally. The analysis of ¹⁵N in N₂ and N₂O is now fully automated by continuous-flow isotope-ratio mass spectrometry for 12-ml gas samples contained in septum-capped vials. Depending on the methodology, the limit of detection ranges from 4 to 11 g N ha^-1day^-1 for N₂ and 4 to 15 g N ha^-1day^-1 for N₂O. By measuring the ¹⁵N content and distribution of ¹⁵N atoms in the N₂O molecules, information can also be obtained to help diagnose the sources of N₂O and the processes producing it. Only a limited number of field studies have been done using the ¹⁵N gas-flux method on agricultural soils. The measured flux rates and mole fractions of N₂O have been highly variable. In rain-fed agricultural soils, soil temperature and water-filled pore space change with the weather and so are difficult to modify. Soil organic C, NO ₃ ^- and pH should be amenable to more control. The effect of organic C depends on the degree of anaerobiosis generated as a result of its metabolism. If conditions for denitrification are not limiting, split applications of organic C will produce more N₂O than a single application because of the time lag in the synthesis of N₂O reductase. Increasing the NO ₃ ^- concentration above the K _m value for NO ₃ ^- reductase, or decreasing soil pH from 7 to 5, will have little effect on denitrification rate but will increase the mole fraction of N₂O. The effect of NO ₃ ^- concentration on the mole fraction of N₂O is enhanced at low pH. Manipulating the interaction between NO ₃ ^- supply and soil pH offers the best hope for minimising N₂O and N₂ fluxes.     

Nitrous oxide emissions for 6 years from a gray lowland soil cultivated with onions in Hokkaido, Japan

We studied nitrous oxide (N₂O) emissions every growing season (April to October) for 6 years (19952000), in a Gray Lowland soil cultivated with onions in central Hokkaido, Japan. Emission of N₂O from the onion field ranged from 0.00 to 1.86 mgN m^–2 h^–1. The seasonal pattern of N₂O emission was the same for 6 years. The largest N₂O emissions appeared near harvesting in August to October, and not, as might be expected, just after fertilization in May. The seasonal patterns of soil nitrate (NO₃ ^–) and, ammonium (NH₄ ⁺) levels and the ratio of N₂O to NO emission indicated that the main process of N₂O production after fertilization was nitrification, and the main process of N₂O production around harvest time was denitrification. N₂O emission was strongly influenced by the drying–wetting process of the soil, as well as by the high soil water content. The annual N₂O emission during the growing season ranged from 3.5 to 15.6 kgN ha^–1. The annual nitrogen loss by N₂O emission as a percentage of fertilizer-N ranged from 1.1 to 6.4%. About 70% of the annual N₂O emission occurred near harvesting in August to October, and less than 20% occurred just after fertilization in May to July. High N₂O fluxes around the harvesting stage and a high proportion of N₂O emission to total fertilizer-N appeared to be probably a characteristic of the study area located in central Hokkaido, Japan.