Concurrent cisplatin, prolonged oral etoposide, and vincristine plus chest and brain irradiation for limited small cell lung cancer: a phase II study of the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG-9229)

PURPOSE: The primary objectives of the study were to evaluate the efficacy and safety of prolonged oral (PO) etoposide as part of cisplatin-based chemotherapy plus concurrent chest/brain irradiation induction, followed by CAV consolidation, in the treatment of patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC-LD) within a cooperative group setting. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Fifty-six eligible patients with SCLC-LD received three 28-day cycles of cisplatin 50 mg/m2 i.v. (days 1, 8; 29, 36; and 57, 64), PO etoposide 50 mg/m2 (days 1-14, 29-42, and 57-70), and vincristine 2 mg i.v. (days 1, 29, and 57). Thoracic irradiation (TRT) was administered at 1.8 Gy in 25 daily fractions to a total dose of 45 Gy via an AP:PA arrangement, to begin concomitantly with induction chemotherapy. Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) was started on day 15 of induction therapy. Fifteen daily fractions of 2.0 Gy were administered to the entire brain to a total dose of 30 Gy to finish at approximately the same time as TRT. Two 21-day cycles of consolidation cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2 i.v., doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 i.v., and vincristine 2 mg i.v. (all on days 1 and 22), were given beginning on day 106 or week 16, from the start of induction therapy. RESULTS: Among 56 eligible patients, 93% had SWOG performance status 0-1. All had adequate organ function and had not received prior therapy. The overall confirmed response rate was 46%, including 16% complete responders and 30% partial responders. After a minimum follow-up duration of 17 months, the Kaplan-Meier median progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 10 and 15 months, respectively. Two-year survival is 28%. Only 28 of 56 patients (50%) completed chemotherapy per protocol, while 52 of 56 patients (93%) completed radiation per protocol. Eleven patients (20%) discontinued secondary to toxicity and two patients died from treatment. The major toxicity was hematologic. The two deaths were secondary to infection. Of the nonhematologic toxicities, there were 10 cases of pulmonary fibrosis (including one Grade 3) and six cases of pneumonitis (including one Grade 3). CONCLUSION: Concomitant chemoradiation with oral etoposide as part of a platinum-based chemotherapy and TRT induction regimen is toxic. The CR rate is not better than our prior best group-wide experience. The progression-free and overall survival are similar to published trials utilizing short-course i.v. etoposide. As in chemotherapy for extensive-stage SCLC, there is no apparent advantage to prolonged exposure to etoposide, and toxicity resulted in an inferior therapeutic index compared to programs with shortened exposure.     

Paclitaxel, carboplatin, and extended-schedule etoposide in the treatment of small-cell lung cancer: comparison of sequential phase II trials using different dose-intensities

PURPOSE: In two sequential phase II studies, we evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of adding paclitaxel to a standard platinum/etoposide regimen in the first-line treatment of small-cell lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred seventeen patients with small-cell lung cancer were treated between June 1993 and July 1996. The first 38 patients received a lower-dose regimen: paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 by 1-hour infusion, carboplatin at an area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of 5.0, and etoposide 50 mg alternating with 100 mg orally on days 1 to 10. When only mild myelosuppression was observed, doses of paclitaxel and carboplatin were increased in the subsequent 79 patients (paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 by 1-hour infusion and carboplatin at an AUC of 6.0). All patients received four courses of treatment, administered at 21-day intervals. Patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer also received thoracic radiation therapy (1.8 Gy/d; total dose, 45 Gy) administered concurrently with courses 3 and 4 of chemotherapy. RESULTS: Seventy-two of 79 patients (91%) who receive the higher-dose regimen had major responses. Thirty-two of 38 (84%) with extensive-stage disease responded (21% complete response rate); median survival was 10 months for this group. With limited-stage disease, the overall response rate was 98%, with 71% complete responses; the median survival time has not been reached at 16 months. Median survival in extensive-stage patients was longer in patients who received the higher-dose regimen (10 months) than in the previous group treated with lower doses (7 months; P = .008). The higher-dose regimen was well tolerated, with myelosuppression being the major toxicity. Compared with the lower-dose regimen, grade 3/4 neutropenia increased from 8% to 38% of courses, but the incidence of hospitalization for neutropenia and fever did not increase. Other nonhematologic toxicities were uncommon, and did not increase substantially with the higher-dose regimen. CONCLUSION: Paclitaxel can be added at full dose (200 mg/m2) to a carboplatin/etoposide combination while maintaining a tolerable toxicity profile. Median survival times in both extensive- and limited-stage patients compare favorably with other reported regimens. This regimen merits further investigation, and a randomized trial to compare this regimen with a standard carboplatin/etoposide combination is underway.     

Systemic chemotherapy alone for patients with non-acquired immunodeficiency syndrome-related central nervous system lymphoma: a pilot study of the BOMES protocol

BACKGROUND: Anecdotal reports have suggested that systemic chemotherapy with agents that better cross the blood-brain barrier may result in long term disease remission in some patients with central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma. This treatment strategy has the advantage of sparing patients the late neurologic complications from brain irradiation. METHODS: Eligible patients were required to 1) have tissue-proven and measurable non-acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)- related primary or metastatic CNS lymphoma; 2) have normal hemogram, renal function, and hepatic function; 3) be age < or = 75 years; and 4) have provided informed consent. Patients with lymphoblastic lymphoma or patients who previously had been exposed to nitrosoureas, etoposide, or high dose methotrexate were not eligible. The systemic chemotherapy (BOMES regimen) included carmustine, 65 mg/m2/day, intravenously (i.v.) on Days 1-2; vincristine, 2 mg/day, i.v. on Days 1 and 8; methotrexate, 1.5 g/m2, i.v. on day 15 followed by leucovorin rescue; etoposide, 50 mg/m2/day, i.v. on Days 1-5; and methylprednisolone, 200 mg/day, i.v. on Days 1-7; repeated every 4 weeks (BOMES regimen). Four doses of intrathecal methotrexate were given to patients who had involvement in the cerebrospinal fluid. RESULTS: Between March 1991 and March 1997 a total of 19 patients were enrolled on the study. There were 13 men and 6 women, with a median age of 57 years. Fourteen patients had primary CNS lymphoma and 5 patients had concurrent extra-CNS lymphoma. Nine patients previously had been treated by radiotherapy (four patients), chemotherapy (three patients), or both (two patients). There were 11 complete remissions (CR) (57.9%) and 5 partial remissions (26.3%), with a total remission rate of 84.2%. One patient had had progressive brain lymphoma during systemic chemotherapy with the conventional cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone regimen, but achieved CR soon after the regimen was changed to BOMES. The median time to progression of the responders was 6 months. At last follow-up, 4 patients were alive without lymphoma at 10, 47, 64, and 66 months, respectively. There were two treatment-related deaths due to sepsis. Another two patients died of fulminant hepatitis that most likely was chemotherapy-related reactivation of chronic B viral hepatitis. CONCLUSIONS: The authors believe systemic chemotherapy alone may result in long term disease remission in some select patients with non-AIDS-related CNS lymphoma. Further investigation for better protocols is mandatory.     

The role of transcription factor PU.1 in the activity of the intronic enhancer of the eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (RNS2) gene

PURPOSE: To evaluate the therapeutic significance of cisplatin, vincristine, doxorubicin, and etoposide (CODE) plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) compared with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine, alternating with cisplatin and etoposide (CAV/PE) for extensive-disease (ED) small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred twenty-seven patients were randomized. CODE consisted of cisplatin 25 mg/m2 weekly for 9 weeks; vincristine 1 mg/m2 on weeks 1, 2, 4, and 6; and doxorubicin 40 mg/m2 and etoposide 80 mg/m2 for 3 days on weeks 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9. G-CSF 50 micrograms/m2 was administered on the days when chemotherapy was not administered. CAV/PE consisted of cyclophosphamide 800 mg/m2; doxorubicin 50 mg/m2; and vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 on day 1, which alternated every 3 weeks with cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 1 and etoposide 100 mg/m2 on days 1 to 3. RESULTS: Overall response rates were 77% for the CAV/PE arm and 84% for the CODE arm respectively (15% complete response in both arms). The median survival times were 10.9 months in the CAV/PE arm and 11.6 months in the CODE arm (P = .1034). The achieved dose-intensity for CODE was approximately twice that for CAV/PE for those drugs common to both arms. The incidence of leukopenia did not differ between the two arms, but anemia and thrombocytopenia had a significantly higher incidence in the CODE arm. Four treatment-related deaths from neutropenic fever occurred in the CODE arm. CONCLUSION: The CODE group had a similar median survival to the CAV/PE group. It does not appear that CODE is a useful approach to improve survival in ED SCLC.     

Mutant rescue by BAC clone injection in zebrafish

PURPOSE: To evaluate the rate of tumor recurrence within the irradiated volume after initial low-dose irradiation of limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), to assess the tolerance of a sequential combination of low-dose chest irradiation followed by chemotherapy, and to confirm the responsiveness of limited-stage SCLC to low-dose irradiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In this pilot study, 26 patients with limited-stage SCLC were treated by first-line 20-Gy thoracic irradiation followed 3 weeks later by chemotherapy (cisplatin, doxorubicin, and etoposide for six cycles). RESULTS: We present our final results with a median follow-up of surviving patients of 7 years. The response rate to this low-dose irradiation was 83%, with an overall response rate to radiochemotherapy of 96% and a median survival of 21 months. No unexpected early or late toxicity was observed. The rate of initial isolated local failure was 8%, which compares favorably with other published series using higher doses of radiochemotherapy. CONCLUSION: An initial chest irradiation of 20 Gy before chemotherapy could be sufficient to reduce the risk of local failure during the time of survival of patients with limited-stage SCLC. Potential advantages of this treatment may be the prevention of resistance mechanisms to radiotherapy induced by preliminary chemotherapy and a reduced radiation-induced toxicity.     

A phase II study of all-trans-retinoic acid plus cisplatin and etoposide in patients with extensive stage small cell lung carcinoma: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study

BACKGROUND: The dysregulation of both myc gene expression and retinoid signaling pathways commonly occurs in small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC). Because preclinical data showed that all-trans-retinoic acid (RA) inhibited SCLC growth, altered myc expression, and blocked transition to a treatment-resistant phenotype, a Phase II trial was designed to determine the effects of the combination of RA, cisplatin, and etoposide in patients with SCLC. METHODS: Patients with untreated, extensive stage SCLC were treated with up to 8 cycles of cisplatin, 60 mg/m2, intravenously (i.v.) on Day 1 and etoposide, 120 mg/m2, i.v. on Days 1-3 in addition to up to 1 year of oral RA, 150 mg/m2/day. RESULTS: Of 22 assessable patients 1 had a complete response and 9 had a partial response, for an overall response rate of 45% (95% confidence interval, 24-68%). The median survival was 10.9 months and the 1-year survival was 41%. The median duration of chemotherapy was 6 cycles and the median duration of RA treatment was 2.8 months. Thirteen patients discontinued RA prematurely due to toxicity and only 4 responders were receiving RA at the time of recurrence. Toxicity-limiting RA treatment mainly was comprised of mucocutaneous changes and headaches. CONCLUSIONS: RA at a dose of 150 mg/m2/day was tolerated poorly in combination with cisplatin plus etoposide, leading to early discontinuation of RA in the majority of patients. The hematologic toxicity, response rate, and survival were similar to those associated with cisplatin and etoposide in prior trials. Further studies with more active and less toxic agents will be required to determine the role of retinoids in the treatment of SCLC.     

Effect of prostaglandin A1 on proliferation and telomerase activity of human melanoma cells in vitro

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Idarubicin, an anthracycline analogue, is active in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. This study evaluates the efficacy and toxicity of a combination of idarubicin, etoposide and intermediate-dose cytarabine (IVA) in unfavorable lymphoma in relapse or resistant to prior doxorubicin- or novantrone-based regimens. DESIGN AND METHODS: Thirty patients with relapsing or resistant unfavorable lymphoma received a combination of idarubicin 12 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1, etoposide 60 mg/m2 i.v. every 12 hours for 3 days, and Ara-C 1 g/m2 i.v. every 12 hours for 3 days (3-hour infusion). Median age was 39 years (range: 22-60). All patients had been given prior doxorubicin or novantrone; 54% of them had received 2 or more chemotherapy regimens; 67% of total were in clinical relapse (30% in their second relapse), and 23% had resistant disease. RESULTS: The overall response rate to IVA was 60% (18 of 30 patients). Complete remission rate was 20% (6 of 30) in the whole group, 45% (5 of 11) among patients in their first relapse. Remission median duration was 9 months (range: 1-18), with a 3-year relapse-free and overall survival of 20% and 15%, respectively. Severe neutropenia occurred in 13 patients (43%) and severe thrombocytopenia in 11 patients (37%), with a median duration of 9 and 13 days, respectively. No cardiac toxicity developed; sepsis during neutropenia was documented in four instances and two patients (7%) died of therapy-related events (septic shock). INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: Idarubicin combined with etoposide and intermediate-dose cytarabine proved to be an active salvage therapy in unfavorable lymphoma given prior doxorubicin or novantrone; the best results were obtained among patients in their first relapse, with low tumor burden.     

Paclitaxel in combination chemotherapy with radiotherapy in patients with unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE: The addition of combination chemotherapy to standard radiation therapy has improved treatment for locally unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer. In this phase II study, we evaluated the toxicity and efficacy of a novel chemotherapy regimen that included paclitaxel, cisplatin, and etoposide plus concurrent radiation therapy in this group of patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-three patients with previously untreated, unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (stage IIIA, 11 patients; stage IIIB, 22 patients) initially received two courses of chemotherapy, which included paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 by 1-hour infusion on day 1, cisplatin 60 mg/m/ intravenously (i.v.) on day 2, and etoposide 100 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1, 2 and 3. On week 6, radiation therapy (60 Gy in 30 fractions) was initiated in conjunction with two additional courses of chemotherapy: paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 i.v. by 1-hour infusion on day 1, cisplatin 5 mg/m2 i.v. on days 2- to 10, and etoposide 25 mg/m2 on days 1 to 10. RESULTS: This combined modality program was feasible and well tolerated by most patients. During the two courses of induction chemotherapy, grade 3 or 4 myelosuppression occurred in only six patients (18%). Esophagitis was common during combined modality therapy (grade 3, 10 patients; grade 4 five patients). Forty-two percent of patients had partial response after two courses of induction therapy, and 82% of patients had an objective response at completion of therapy. Twelve patients (36%) had a complete response. Nineteen patients remain progression-free at a median of 8 months; the median survival time has not been reached. CONCLUSION: This paclitaxel-containing combined modality therapy is feasible and highly active in patients with inoperable stage III lung cancer. Esophagitis is the most common severe toxicity with this program. Further studies with paclitaxel-containing combination regimens in patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer are indicated.     

Randomized trial comparing two different modalities of administration of the same cytotoxic drugs in metastatic breast cancer

This protocol compare the efficacy of continuous infusion fluorouracil (5-FU) with weekly doxorubicin (DOX) and cyclophosphamide (CPM) to a "classical" monthly regimen of the same drugs, as a first line of treatment in metastatic breast carcinoma. The first arm of this protocol consisted of FAC: 5-FU 600 mg/m2 i.v. over 1 hour, day(d) 1, 2, 3, DOX 50 mg/m2 i.v. bolus, d1, and CPM, 400 mg/m2 i.v. bolus, d 1, 2, 3. The second arm consisted of FULON: 5-FU 250 mg/m2 per day continuously infused from d1 to d22, CPM 300 mg/m2 i.v. bolus, d1, 8, 15, 22, and DOX 15 mg/m2 i.v. bolus, day 1, 8, 15, 22. Between January 1990 and June 1993, 258 women with proven metastatic breast carcinoma were randomly assigned either to receive FAC or FULON chemotherapy regimen. Chemotherapy courses were administrated every 4 weeks for FAC regimen and every 6 weeks for FULON. Response rate (54 versus 53%), response duration (14 versus 12 months) and overall survival duration (23 versus 21 months) were not significantly different in the two regimens (FAC versus FULON). Preorative prognostic value of liver metastasis or high LDH level was slightly attenuated in patients treated by FULON. Efficacy of infusional 5-FU in metastatic breast cancer could have been lowered by weekly infusion of doxorubicin in the FULON regimen compared to monthly infusion. According to the modalities of delivery of the drugs, the two regimens seem equally effective.     

Drug resistance patterns among tuberculosis patients in Rome, 1990-1992

PURPOSE: A Phase II study to evaluate the effect of a five-drug regimen, VP-16, ifosfamide, cisplatin, vinblastine, and bleomycin (VIP/VB) on complete response rate, continuous disease-free survival, and toxicity in patients with advanced germ-cell tumor. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty male patients with a histologic diagnosis of advanced-stage germ-cell cancer, previously untreated with chemotherapy, received the following: etoposide 75 mg/m2 i.v. days 1-5; ifosfamide (with mesna uroprotection) 1.2 g/m2 i.v. days 1-5; cisplatin 20 mg/m2 i.v. days 1-5; vinblastine 0.18 mg/kg i.v. day 1; bleomycin 30 units i.v. day 1; filgrastim 5 micrograms/kg days 7-16. Chemotherapy was given every 3 weeks (bleomycin weekly x 12) for four courses. RESULTS: All patients entered were evaluable for toxicity, response, and survival. Eleven of 20 (55%) achieved complete remissions with chemotherapy alone and an additional 5 (25%) were rendered disease-free with surgical resection of teratoma (3) or viable cancer (2). Two patients relapsed at 4 and 5 months from complete remission (CR). There was one treatment-related death, from bleomycin lung toxicity after thoracotomy. Thirteen patients (65%) are alive and continuously free of disease, with a median follow-up of 20 months and a minimal follow-up of 12 months. Hematologic toxicity was most common, with 16 patients (80%) having grade 3 or 4 leukopenia. CONCLUSIONS: VIP/VB appears to be a very active regimen in advanced disseminated germ-cell cancer. Hematological toxicity was severe but manageable.     

Etoposide, epirubicin and cisplatin (EEP) combination in metastatic cancers of the cardia and the stomach. Groupe de recherche en cancérologie du Nord (GRECNO)

This study was aimed to confirm the therapeutic activity of the combination of etoposide, doxorubicin and cisplatin which has shown some clinical efficiency as first line therapy in advanced gastric cancer. Seventeen patients with metastatic gastric cancer were treated with etoposide (120 mg/m2, i.v., on day 5, 6 and 7), epirubicin (20 mg/m2, i.v., on day 1 and 7) and cisplatin (40 mg/m2, i.v., on day 2 and 8), q 4 weeks. In 16 patients evaluable for response, three (19%) obtained a partial response lasting from 93 to 360 days. Fifteen patients were evaluable for toxicity. Main toxicities > grade 2 included anemia (2/15), neutropenia (5/15), alopecia (8/15), fatigue (3/15), diarrhea (2/15), vomiting (2/15). Twenty nine per cent of severe toxic events were documented all along 52 cycles. Therefore we failed to confirm that this regimen could be of clinical efficiency in advanced gastric cancer as regards the benefits/toxicity ratio.     

Cisplatin plus oral etoposide in the treatment of patients with advanced small cell lung cancer. Japan Clinical Oncology Group

BACKGROUND: Etoposide is a highly schedule-dependent drug. We investigated combination chemotherapy of oral etoposide and intravenous cisplatin for small cell lung cancer (SCLC). METHODS: Fifty-seven patients with SCLC with extensive disease (ED) or limited disease (LD) with pleural effusion registered in the 21 institutions of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group were treated with oral etoposide 40 mg/m2/d for 21 days and cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 1 of every 28-period day. The entry period was between February 1992 and August 1995. The actual percentages of patients treated with etoposide were 93.6, 89.5, 92.3 and 96.9% in the first, second, third and fourth cycles, respectively. RESULTS: Nine patients (15.8%) achieved a complete response resulting in an overall response rate of 82.5% (95% confidence interval, 70.1-91.3%). Leukopenia and thrombocytopenia of grade 3 or 4 were observed in 36 (49.1%) and 8 (14.0%) patients, respectively. Anemia of grade 3 or 4 occurred in 28 (49.1%) patients. Nausea, vomiting, anorexia and alopecia were common adverse events. One patient died of hemoptysis due to grade 4 thrombocytopenia. The mean survival time was 47.0 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: This dose and schedule of administration of etoposide in combination with cisplatin are considered to be clinically active. However, prolonged gastrointestinal toxicity of oral etoposide was a problem in comparison with the standard etoposide platinum regimen given by intravenous administration.     

Paclitaxel with mitoxantrone, fluorouracil, and high-dose leucovorin in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer: a phase II trial

PURPOSE: Paclitaxel is a highly active single agent in the treatment of breast cancer. However, its optimal incorporation into combination regimens awaits definition. In this phase II study, we added paclitaxel, administered by 1-hour infusion, to a previously described combination regimen that included mitoxantrone, fluorouracil (5-FU), and high-dose leucovorin (NFL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-six patients with metastatic breast cancer received the following regimen as first- or second-line treatment: paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 by 1-hour intravenous (i.v.) infusion on day 1, mitoxantrone 10 mg/m2 by i.v. bolus on day 1, 5-FU 350 mg2/m by i.v. bolus on days 1, 2, and 3, and leucovorin 300 mg i.v. over 30 to 60 minutes immediately preceding 5-FU on days 1, 2, and 3. Courses were administered at 3-week intervals for a total of eight courses in responding patients. RESULTS: Twenty-three of 45 assessable patients (51%) had major responses. Previous chemotherapy, and in particular previous treatment with doxorubicin, did not affect response rate. The median response duration was 7.5 months. Myelosuppression was moderately severe, with 76% of courses resulting in grade 3 or 4 leukopenia. Hospitalization for treatment of fever during neutropenia was required in 13% of courses, and two patients died as a result of sepsis. Two patients developed severe congestive heart failure after a large cumulative anthracycline dose. CONCLUSION: This combination regimen was active as first- or second-line therapy for metastatic breast cancer, although its activity compared with other combination regimens or with paclitaxel alone is unclear. Myelosuppression was more severe than anticipated based on previous results with the NFL regimen or with paclitaxel administered at this dose and schedule as a single agent. The infrequent development of cardiotoxicity in these patients suggests that the paclitaxel/mitoxantrone combination may not share the problems previously reported with the paclitaxel/doxorubicin combination.     

Phase II study of topotecan in patients with extensive-stage small-cell carcinoma of the lung: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial

PURPOSE: To determine the response rate and survival of chemotherapy-naive patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) treated with topotecan, and to determine the relationship of topotecan pharmacokinetics with response and toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-eight patients with previously untreated, extensive-stage SCLC received 2.0 mg/m2 of topotecan daily for 5 days. The first 13 patients were treated without colony-stimulating factor (CSF) support; the next 35 patients received 5 micrograms/kg of granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) for 10 to 14 days starting on day 6. Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks for a maximum of four cycles. Patients who had a partial response to topotecan after four cycles, stable disease after two cycles, or progressive disease at any time received salvage chemotherapy with cisplatin and etoposide. Topotecan pharmacokinetics were measured using a four-point sampling scheme. RESULTS: Of 48 patients, none had a complete response and 19 had a partial response, for an objective response rate of 39% (95% confidence interval [CI], 25.2% to 53.0%). The median response duration was 4.8 months (95% CI, 3.0 to 7.3). After a median follow-up duration of 18.2 months, the overall median survival time was 10.0 months (95% CI, 8.2 to 12.7); the 1-year survival rate was 39% (95% CI, 25.2% to 53.0%). Eight of 34 patients (24%) who received salvage chemotherapy responded. Four of 17 patients who did not respond to first-line therapy with topotecan responded to cisplatin and etoposide. The most common toxicity was hematologic. Ninety-two percent of patients treated without G-CSF developed grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, compared with 29% who received G-CSF. However, the incidence of neutropenic fevers was similar between the two groups (8% and 11%, respectively), and one patient in each group died of neutropenic fevers. There were no differences in objective tumor response, duration of response, time to treatment failure, or survival between the 13 patients who entered the study before G-CSF administration was mandated and the 35 patients who entered after and received G-CSF. There was poor correlation between the WBC count and absolute neutrophil counts (ANCs) and both the area under the curve (AUC) and maximum concentration++ (Cmx) of total topotecan in plasma. There was no correlation between the tumor response and either AUC or Cmx of total topotecan. CONCLUSION: The activity of topotecan in extensive-stage SCLC noted in this study warrants further investigation of this agent in phase III clinical trials.     

The role of lipogenesis in the development of obesity and diabetes in Israeli sand rats (Psammomys obesus)

In order to optimize the therapeutic index of combining etoposide, epirubicin, cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), leucovorin (EEPFL) chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer, a trial of a novel schedule of weekly administration was conducted. Weekly EEPFL treatment consisted of a concomitant boost of etoposide 40 mg m(-2) i.v. over 30 min, epirubicin 10 mg m(-2) i.v. over 5 min to a backbone regimen, weekly PFL chemotherapy with cisplatin 25 mg m(-2), 5-FU 2200 mg m(-2), leucovorin 120 mg m(-2) given simultaneously by 24-h i.v. infusion. Response, survival and toxicity were evaluated. Forty-two patients were studied. Median age was 69 (range 31-84) years. Twenty-six per cent of patients showed complete response and 45% partial response. The overall response rate was 71% (95% confidence interval 58-84%). For a total of 507 weekly EEPFL cycles delivered, the incidence of grade 4 leucopenia was 1% of cycles. One patient died of neutropenia septicaemia. There was no other grade 4 toxicity. Grade 3 and 2 leucopenia occurred in 7% and 14% of cycles. The incidence of grade 3 and 2 mucositis was 1% and 3% of cycles. Grade 3 and 2 diarrhoea occurred in 0.4% and 1.6% of cycles. Overall median survival was 10 months (range 3-41+ months). Weekly EEPFL chemotherapy is an effective regimen with tolerable toxicities in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. A randomized controlled clinical trial to formally assess the efficacy and benefit of EEPFL chemotherapy is under way.     

Scaling of movement velocity: a measure of neuromotor retardation in individuals with psychopathology

The combination of ifosfamide, carboplatin and etoposide (modified ICE), was evaluated for its toxicity and activity in relapsed or refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Twenty patients, 14-69 years of age, with relapsed (19 cases) or refractory (one case) aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma were treated with modified ICE therapy, consisting of ifosfamide 6 g/m2 (1.2 g/m2 day 1-5), carboplatin 400 mg/m2 (day 1) and etoposide 500 mg/m2 (100 mg/m2 day 1-5). The regimen was repeated at approximately 28-day intervals. All patients had undergone a doxorubicin-containing regimen before modified ICE therapy. Median total dose of previously received doxorubicin was 406 mg/m2 (range: 200-825 mg/m2). The median interval from diagnosis to modified ICE therapy was 9.4 months (range: 3.6-121 months). Two patients achieved CR and five achieved PR out of 16 patients with measurable lesions (response rate 43.8%; 95% confidence interval 19.0-68.6%). Median overall survival was 227 days (range: 41-552 days) from the start of modified ICE therapy. Myelosuppression was the most serious toxicity, namely 16 patients (80%) and 11 patients (55%) showed grade 4 neutropenia and grade 4 thrombocytopenia after the first course, respectively. Modified ICE therapy might be an active regimen with acceptable toxicity as a salvage chemotherapy in aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.     

Mitotane associated with etoposide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin in the treatment of advanced adrenocortical carcinoma. Italian Group for the Study of Adrenal Cancer

BACKGROUND: The use of either mitotane or chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) has led to scanty and controversial results. The recent finding that mitotane is able to reverse in vitro multidrug resistance has provided a rational basis for combining this agent with cytotoxic drugs. The association of mitotane with etoposide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (EDP) in the treatment of patients with advanced, inoperable ACC was tested in an Italian multicenter Phase II trial. METHODS: Twenty-eight patients (18 women and 10 men; median age, 47 years; range, 27-65 years) with measurable disease were enrolled in the study and evaluated for toxicity and response. There were 18 patients with clinical and/or biochemical evidence of steroid hypersecretion. An EDP schedule (etoposide 100 mg/m2 on Days 5-7, doxorubicin 20 mg/m2 on Days 1 and 8, and cisplatin 40 mg/m2 on Days 1 and 9) was administered intravenously every 4 weeks; concomitantly, patients were given up to 4 g/day of oral mitotane or the maximum tolerated dose, without any interruption between chemotherapy cycles. RESULTS: According to World Health Organization criteria, complete response was achieved in 2 patients and partial response in 13, for an overall response rate of 53.5% (95% CI, 35-72%). Stable disease was observed in 8 patients and progressive disease in 5. Responses occurred in patients with both functioning and nonfunctioning tumors, and more often in those bearing lymph node and lung metastases. Time to progression in responding patients was 24.4 months. Generally, the EDP regimen was well tolerated. Only 4 patients received reduced doses, whereas 3 discontinued early chemotherapy due to toxicity. The addition of mitotane increased neurologic and gastrointestinal side effects. Due to these additional toxicities, only 9 patients regularly took the drug at the planned dose (4 g/day); 11 received the maximum tolerated dose of 3 g/day, 6 received 2 g/day, and 1 received 1 g/day. Mitotane was also responsible for raised serum levels of cholesterol and triglycerides. A complete hormone response (normalization of altered biochemical parameters) was observed in 9 of 16 evaluable patients with functioning tumors. CONCLUSIONS: EDP plus mitotane combination chemotherapy appears to be active and manageable treatment for patients with advanced ACC.     

Effect of alternating combination chemotherapy consisting of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, cisplatin, and etoposide for small cell lung cancer on hematopoietic progenitors in the peripheral blood

The effects of a combination chemotherapy (CAV-PVP) consisting of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, hydrochloride (dox) and vincristine (CAV) alternating with cisplatin and etoposide (PVP) on peripheral blood hematopoietic progenitor cells (PBHPs) were studied in five patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC). The kinetics of the CFU-GM levels were different during the CAV and PVP phases. None of the five patients displayed a rebound increase in the level of peripheral blood CFU-GM during the CAV phase. In contrast, all five patients displayed a rebound increase in peripheral blood CFU-GM levels during the PVP phase of the alternative combination chemotherapy (3-5 weeks after the initiation of PVP regimen). These findings indicate the optimal timing for leukapheresis to obtain PBHPs in SCLC patients which have been treated with an alternating combination chemotherapy consisting of CAV-PVP.     

Advances in antiviral therapy

The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of etoposide and carboplatin without growth factor support was previously defined by Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) as 200 and 125 mg/m2/day x 3, respectively, given every 28 days to previously untreated patients who have extensive, small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Myelosuppression was dose-limiting. The purpose of this phase I trial was to determine if granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) support allows the dosage of the combination of etoposide and carboplatin to be increased above the previously determined MTD. In this CALGB study of 44 evaluable patients with performance status 0-2, cohorts were treated with etoposide and carboplatin given intravenously on days 1-3 followed by GM-CSF (molgramostim) given subcutaneously on days 4-18. Four dose levels of bacteria-derived recombinant GM-CSF (5, 10, 20 microg/kg/day and 5 microg/kg every 12 h), three dose levels of etoposide (200, 250, and 300 mg/m2/day x 3), and two dose levels of carboplatin (125 and 150 mg/m2/day x 3) were evaluated. There was no chemotherapy dose escalation in individual patients. With 5 microg/kg/d GM-CSF, the first etoposide and carboplatin cycle of 300 and 150 mg/m2/day x 3, respectively, could be administered with acceptable toxicity. However, GM-CSF did not allow repeated administration of this dose-escalated regimen every 21 days, since delayed platelet and/or neutrophil recovery was dose limiting in later cycles. These results demonstrate that GM-CSF alone has limited capability to support the repeated administration of high doses of etoposide and carboplatin. CALGB currently is testing the ability of interleukin (IL)-6 given with GM-CSF to ameliorate the cumulative myelosuppression of this intense regimen.     

Oviposition and incubation environmental effects on embryonic diapause in a ground cricket

PURPOSE: Recent studies document the value of early combined modality therapy of small cell lung cancer, but also indicate that early thoracic radiation adds to myelosuppression and can complicate further chemotherapy. Other studies indicate that simultaneous use of growth factors with thoracic radiation may be deleterious. However, temporal separation of growth factor use from cytotoxic therapy may allow dose intensity to be maintained/enhanced during combined modality treatment. We sought to integrate filgrastim into a novel chemoradiation regimen for patients with limited small cell lung cancer using an approach that separated growth factor administration from both chemotherapy and thoracic radiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty-seven patients with limited disease small cell lung cancer were enrolled in a Phase I trial of cisplatin, ifosfamide/mesna, oral etoposide, and thoracic radiation (1.5 Gy b.i.d. x 30 fractions days 1-19 cycle 1) +/- filgrastim (5 microg/kg/day). Filgrastim was given on days 20-25 of cycle 1 after completion of radiation and following completion of oral etoposide in subsequent cycles. The primary end point was determination of maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of chemotherapy. Serial cohorts were treated with and without filgrastim. RESULTS: Because of dose-limiting thrombocytopenia, primarily, and nonhematologic toxicity, the MTDs with and without filgrastim were identical (cisplatin 20 mg/m2 i.v. and ifosfamide 1200 mg/m2 i.v., both given days 1-3, and etoposide 40 mg/m2 p.o. days 1-14). Filgrastim use shortened the duration of neutropenia at the MTD (median 4 vs. 7 days), but was not associated with a reduction in febrile neutropenia. Although growth factor administration did not allow dose escalation of this regimen, it did allow chemotherapy doses to be maintained at the MTD more frequently through four cycles of therapy. In the 24 evaluable patients, the overall response rate was 100% (71% partial and 29% complete). CONCLUSIONS: Despite careful attention to the timing of growth factor with chemoradiation, the administration of filgrastim with this regimen did not allow dose escalation. As in many other recent studies of hematopoietic growth factors given prophylactically with chemotherapy, the duration of neutropenia at the MTD was shortened and the need for dose reduction throughout treatment was reduced in patients receiving filgrastim at the MTD.