The psychological reality of the body schema: A test with normal participants.

Neuropsychological dissociations suggest the existence of a body schema, a representation of the spatial relations among body parts, not used for other spatial stimuli. Four experiments verify the psychological reality of the body schema in normal participants. In Experiments 1 and 2, proprioceptive information concerning one's own body position influences visual perception of others' body positions. Contrary to expectations, facilitation is observed rather than interference in the dual-performance task. Experiment 3 eliminates the possibility that the effect is due to a particular mnemonic strategy. In Experiment 4, this effect is shown to be specific to the perception of bodies, as opposed to other complex 3-dimensional forms. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Effect of gut transposition on the expression of the endocrine gene neurotensin

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate joint position sense (JPS) in patients with posttraumatic glenohumeral instability. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 28 patients with posttraumatic instability and in a matched control group of 30 subjects proprioception capability was evaluated. For documentation of proprioception an angle reproduction test (ART) was performed with which joint positions sense (JPS) was measured for abduction, flexion, and rotation in three angles each. RESULTS: In both groups there was a significant better JPS with visual control than without. In contrast to the control group the patients were not able to increase angle reproduction capability without visual control when comparing positions below shoulder level with positions at or above shoulder level. When comparing the patients to the controls there were differences in most of the ARTs with worse results in the patient group. These differences were significant in 150 degrees flexion with and without visual control, in 150 degrees abduction without and in 100 degrees abduction with visual control. For rotation there were trends for almost all joint positions, however, the differences were significant only in the -45 position. When comparing the noninjured contralateral shoulder of the patients with the control group, there still were differences. Again these were not in all joint positions significant, but significant worse JPS could be demonstrated in 150 degrees abduction without visual control, 50 degrees flexion without visual control, -45 degrees rotation without and 0 degrees rotation with visual control. CONCLUSIONS: A proprioceptive deficit can be documented in patients with posttraumatic glenohumeral instability. This may be one reason for permanent instability. The contralateral joint also shows reduction in joint position sense. For consecutive treatment as well as for rehabilitation both shoulder joint should be addressed.     

Constraints on learning new mappings between perceptual dimensions.

The constraints on learning new mappings between visual and proprioceptive spatial dimensions were assessed. Incomplete information was provided about a mapping by specifying only a few isolated visual–proprioceptive pairs of locations. The nature of the generalization occurring to untrained locations was then inspected to reveal the internal constraints. A new technique was developed to allow individual visual–proprioceptive pairs to be manipulated separately. In Experiment 1, training with only a single pair produced a rigid shift of one entire dimension with respect to the other. Training with two pairs caused linear interpolation to all untrained positions between the trained positions (Experiments 2 and 3). Finally, training with three new pairs also produced a linear change in behavior (Experiment 4), even though more adaptive solutions existed. The implications of these results for the learning process involved in acquiring new mappings are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Inertial constraints on limb proprioception are independent of visual calibration.

When the coincidence of a limb's spatial axes and inertial eigenvectors is broken, haptic proprioception of the limb's position conforms to the eigenvectors. Additionally, when prisms break the coincidence between an arm's visual and actual positions, haptic proprioception is shifted toward the visual–spatial direction. In 3 experiments, variation of the arm's mass distribution was combined with prism adaptation to investigate the hypothesis that the proprioceptive effects of inertial and visual manipulations are additive. This hypothesis was supported across manipulations of plane of motion, body posture, proprioceptive target, and proprioceptive experience during prism adaptation. Haptic proprioception seems to depend on local, physical reference frames that are relative to the physical reference frames for the body's environmental position and orientation. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

A motor signal and "visual" size perception

Recent models of the visual system in primates suggest that the mechanisms underlying visual perception and visuomotor control are implemented in separate functional streams in the cerebral cortex. However, a little-studied perceptual illusion demonstrates that a motor-related signal representing arm position can contribute to the visual perception of size. The illusion consists of an illusory size change in an afterimage of the hand when the hand is moved towards or away from the subject. The motor signal necessary for the illusion could be specified by feedforward and/or feedback sources (i.e. efference copy and/or proprioception/kinesthesis). We investigated the nature of this signal by measuring the illusion's magnitude when subjects moved their own arm (active condition, feedforward and feedback information available), and when arm movement was under the control of the experimenter (passive condition, feedback information available). Active and passive movements produced equivalent illusory size changes in the afterimages. However, the illusion was not obtained when an after-image of subject's hand was obtained prior to movement of the other hand from a very similar location in space. This evidence shows that proprioceptive/kinesthetic feedback was sufficient to drive the illusion and suggests that a specific three-dimensional registration of proprioceptive input and the initial afterimage is necessary for the illusion to occur.     

Long-term cardiac and pulmonary complications in cancer care

In order to clarify if light manual precision work influences the activity of shoulder muscles, seven shoulder muscles were examined using electromyography (EMG) in five different arm positions in ten subjects. The subjects were asked to perform light precision work with the hand while maintaining the same arm position. The EMG activity in the shoulder muscles with the arm in specific positions was compared to the activity when manual precision work was added. The results were analysed statistically using a non-parametric method. We found an increased EMG activity in almost all arm positions and muscles. The increase was significant in four out of five arm positions regarding the infraspinatus and in three out of five positions concerning the levator scapulae. In the supraspinatus the increase was significant with the arm in its highest location. The average increase in shoulder muscle activity amounted to 22% of the resting activity.     

Hands up: Attentional prioritization of space near the hand.

This study explored whether hand location affected spatial attention. The authors used a visual covert-orienting paradigm to examine whether spatial attention mechanisms--location prioritization and shifting attention--were supported by bimodal, hand-centered representations of space. Placing 1 hand next to a target location, participants detected visual targets following highly predictive visual cues. There was no a priori reason for the hand to influence task performance unless hand presence influenced attention. Results showed that target detection near the hand was facilitated relative to detection away from the hand, regardless of cue validity. Similar facilitation was found with only proprioceptive or visual hand location information but not with arbitrary visual anchors or distant targets. Hand presence affected attentional prioritization of space, not the shifting of attention. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

In search of biased egocentric reference frames in neglect

The present study was aimed at assessing, by means of visual as well as proprioceptive-kinaesthetic straight-ahead tasks, the possible causal role of the ipsilesional deviation of the egocentric reference frame in determining neglect syndrome. The hypothesis, originally proposed by Ventre et al. [3], that an alteration of the representation of body-centred space can be a cause of asymmetrical spatial behaviour in humans has been recently revived by Karnath and co-workers [24]. The results of the present study seem to challenge the view that a systematic ipsilesional displacement of the egocentric reference is the crucial mechanism responsible for unilateral visual neglect. Under visual conditions, in which patients were required to stop a moving spot as it crossed their perceived midline, the ipsilesional deviation of the egocentric reference frame was dependent upon the direction of visual scanning. Right to left visual scanning direction produced a rightward displacement of the egocentric reference. In contrast, left to right visual scanning direction allowed neglect patients to correctly locate their perceived egocentre with an accuracy which did not differ from controls. The notion that the effect of a deviation of the egocentric reference frame is actually dependent on a bias in the visual scanning orienting response was also confirmed in the proprioceptive straight-ahead pointing tasks, in which the patients were blindfolded and therefore no visual information was available. In these conditions, in which patients were required to judge the subjective midline by using head, trunk and shoulder co-ordinate systems, the displacement of the subjective egocentric midline was not present.     

Accuracy and precision of binocular 3-D motion perception.

In principle, information for 3-D motion perception is provided by the differences in position and motion between left- and right-eye images of the world. It is known that observers can precisely judge between different 3-D motion trajectories, but the accuracy of binocular 3-D motion perception has not been studied. The authors measured the accuracy of 3-D motion perception. In 4 different tasks, observers were inaccurate, overestimating trajectory angle, despite consistently choosing similar angles (high precision). Errors did not vary consistently with target distance, as would be expected had inaccuracy been due to misestimates of viewing distance. Observers appeared to rely strongly on the lateral position of the target, almost to the exclusion of the use of depth information. For the present tasks, these data suggest that neither an accurate estimate of 3-D motion direction nor one of passing distance can be obtained using only binocular cues to motion in depth. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

The perceptual experience of slope by foot and by finger.

Historically, the bodily senses have often been regarded as impeccable sources of spatial information and as being the teacher of vision. Here, the authors report that the haptic perception of slope by means of the foot is greatly exaggerated. The exaggeration is present in verbal as well as proprioceptive judgments. It is shown that this misperception of pedal slope is not caused by calibration to the well-established visual misperception of slope because it is present in congenitally blind individuals as well. The pedal misperception of slope is contrasted with the perception of slope by dynamic touch with a finger in a force-feedback device. Although slopes feel slightly exaggerated even when explored by finger, they tend to show much less exaggeration than when equivalent slopes are stood on. The results are discussed in terms of a theory of coding efficiency. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2011 APA, all rights reserved)     

Visual experience, visual field size, and the development of nonvisual sensitivity to the spatial structure of outdoor neighborhoods explored by walking.

When places are explored without vision, observers go from temporally sequenced, circuitous inputs available along walks to knowledge of spatial structure (i.e., straight-line distances and directions characterizing the simultaneous arrangement of the objects passed along the way). Studies show that a life history of vision helps develop nonvisual sensitivity, but they are unspecific on the formative experiences or the underlying processes. This study compared judgments of straight-line distances and directions among landmarks in a familiar area of town by partially sighted persons who varied in types and ages of visual impairment. Those with early childhood loss of broad-field vision and those blind from birth performed significantly worse than those with early or late acuity loss and those with late field loss. Broad-field visual experience facilitates perceptual development by providing a basis for proprioceptive and efferent information from locomotion against distances and directions relative to the surrounding environment. Differences in the perception of walking, in turn, cause the observed differences in sensitivity to spatial structure. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Believing what you feel: Using proprioceptive feedback to reduce unilateral neglect.

Unilateral spatial neglect declines when participants reach to grip the center of long metal rods compared with when they point to the perceived center, suggesting that visuomotor control systems are less affected by neglect than other representational systems (I. H. Robertson, D. Nico, & B. Hood, 1995). In this study, 16 participants with unilateral left neglect actually picked up rods, and we predicted short-term improvements in neglect because of induced conflict between a phenomenally symmetrical visual world on the one hand and a proprioceptively conveyed rightward-biased world on the other. With participants serving as their own controls, significant short-term improvements in neglect were found on 2 out of 4 neglect tasks after participants experienced proprioceptive feedback discrepant from the judgments they made on the basis of visual information alone. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Motor illusions: What do they reveal about proprioception?

Five illusions involving distortions in the perception of limb position, movement, and weight are described in the context of their contribution to understanding the sensory processes involved in proprioception. In particular, these illusions demonstrate that the position sense representation of the body and the awareness of limb movement result from the cross-calibration of visual and proprioceptive signals. Studies of the vibration illusion and phantom-limb phenomenon indicate that the perception of limb movement and position are encoded independently and can be dissociated. Postural aftereffects and the illusions of movement induced by vibration highlight the remarkable lability of this sense of limb position, which is a necessary feature for congruence between the spatial senses. Finally, I discuss the role of corollary discharges in the central processing of afferent information with respect to the size-weight and vibration illusions. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Spatial localization of touch in the first year of life: Early influence of a visual spatial code and the development of remapping across changes in limb position.

Two experiments investigated infants' ability to localize tactile sensations in peripersonal space. Infants aged 10 months (Experiment 1) and 6.5 months (Experiment 2) were presented with vibrotactile stimuli unpredictably to either hand while they adopted either a crossed- or uncrossed-hands posture. At 6.5 months, infants' responses were predominantly manual, whereas at 10 months, visual orienting behavior was more evident. Analyses of the direction of the responses indicated that (a) both age groups were able to locate tactile stimuli, (b) the ability to remap visual and manual responses to tactile stimuli across postural changes develops between 6.5 and 10 months of age, and (c) the 6.5-month-olds were biased to respond manually in the direction appropriate to the more familiar uncrossed-hands posture across both postures. The authors argue that there is an early visual influence on tactile spatial perception and suggest that the ability to remap visual and manual directional responses across changes in posture develops between 6.5 and 10 months, most likely because of the experience of crossing the midline gained during this period. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Second-order motion perception in peripheral vision: limits of early filtering

Spatial and temporal analysis of contrast-modulated sine-wave gratings reveals that the second-order motion stimulus contains two sidebands, with equal energy but moving in opposite directions, flanking a stationary carrier. Any early linear spatial filtering process in the visual system that attenuates one sideband more than the other will be detrimental to the balance between the two sidebands, so that the perceived direction of the carrier might be opposite to that of the envelope motion. We tested this hypothesis by using contrast-modulated gratings presented centrally or at 20 deg in the horizontal nasal field with a two-alternative forced-choice staircase paradigm. We found that when the envelope frequency was close to that of the carrier, a second-order stimulus whose envelope motion direction was correctly identified in the fovea appeared to drift in the opposite direction in the periphery. Further increasing the envelope spatial frequency resulted in a reversed motion percept in both central and peripheral viewing conditions. For subjects to identify correctly the direction of motion of the envelope, the spatial frequency ratio of the carrier to the envelope had to be more than 2 in the fovea and more than 6 in the periphery. These phenomena in second-order motion perception can be explained by a linear model of motion detection with an early spatial filtering process. Further experiments and computer simulation show that undersampling of the carrier has little effect on second-order motion perception in the periphery, as long as the carrier is detectable.     

Emotional expression modulates perceived gaze direction.

Gaze perception is an important social skill, as it portrays information about what another person is attending to. Gaze direction has been shown to affect interpretation of emotional expression. Here the authors investigate whether the emotional facial expression has a reciprocal influence on interpretation of gaze direction. In a forced-choice yes-no task, participants were asked to judge whether three faces expressing different emotions (anger, fear, happiness, and neutral) in different viewing angles were looking at them or not. Happy faces were more likely to be judged as looking at the observer than were angry, fearful, or neutral faces. Angry faces were more often judged as looking at the observer than were fearful and neutral expressions. These findings are discussed on the background of approach and avoidance orientation of emotions and of the self-referential positivity bias. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Spatial representation in body coordinates: Evidence from errors in remembering positions of visual and auditory targets after active eye, head, and body movements.

Eight participants were presented with auditory or visual targets and then indicated the target's remembered positions relative to their head eight seconds after actively moving their eyes, head or body to pull apart head, retinal, body, and external space reference frames. Remembered target position was indicated by repositioning sounds or lights. Localization errors were found related to head-on-body position but not of eye-in-head or body-in-space for both auditory (0.023 dB/deg in the direction of head displacement) and visual targets (0.068 deg/deg in the direction opposite to head displacement). The results indicate that both auditory and visual localization use head-on-body each information, suggesting a common coding into body coordinates--the only conversion that requires this information. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Behavioral studies of sound localization in the cat

Using the magnetic search coil technique to measure eye and ear movements, we trained cats by operant conditioning to look in the direction of light and sound sources with their heads fixed. Cats were able to localize noise bursts, single clicks, or click trains presented from sources located on the horizontal and vertical meridians within their oculomotor range. Saccades to auditory targets were less accurate and more variable than saccades to visual targets at the same spatial positions. Localization accuracy of single clicks was diminished compared with the long-duration stimuli presented from the same sources. Control experiments with novel auditory targets, never associated with visual targets, demonstrated that the cats localized the sound sources using acoustic cues and not from memory. The role of spectral features imposed by the pinna for vertical sound localization was shown by the breakdown in localization of narrow-band (one-sixth of an octave) noise bursts presented from sources along the midsagittal plane. In addition, we show that cats experience summing localization, an illusion associated with the precedence effect. Pairs of clicks presented from speakers at (+/-18 degrees,0 degrees ) with interclick delays of +/-300 microsec were perceived by the cat as originating from phantom sources extending from the midline to approximately +/-10 degrees.     

Proprioceptive coordination of movement sequences: discrimination of joint angle versus angular distance

1. The purpose of these experiments was to determine the accuracy with which human subjects could discriminate proprioceptive (nonretinotopic) targets during movement. The targets were located at either a specified angle in joint space, or a specified angular distance from an initial joint angle. 2. In these experiments the right elbows of normal human subjects were passively extended from either predictable or unpredictable starting angles. The subjects were instructed to open the right hand to indicate that the elbow was passing through a target joint angle or a target angular distance. The subjects were not given visual information about the location of the elbow, so they had to rely on proprioceptive input to perform this task. The target (criterion joint angle or angular distance) was learned by the use of proprioception during 8-15 practice trials. 3. Four experiments were conducted. In three experiments the target was located at a constant joint angle, and in the fourth experiment the target was located at a constant angular distance from the starting angle. The starting angle in all four experiments was pseudorandomly varied from trial to trial. 4. On the basis of an analysis of constant errors, subjects were more accurate at discriminating angular distance than joint angle. The slope of the relationship between the starting position and the constant errors was dictated by the task requirement. 5. In the distance discrimination experiment, when the starting angle was more flexed than the intermediate (i.e., central) position, the subjects slightly overshot the target distance. Conversely, when the starting angle was more extended than the intermediate position, the subjects slightly undershot the target distance. 6. In the joint angle discrimination experiments, the opposite results were obtained. Subjects overshot the target when the starting position of the elbow was more extended than the intermediate starting position, and they undershot the target when the starting position was more flexed than the intermediate starting position. The amplitude of these systematic errors increased when the subjects were unaware that the initial angle of their elbow was variable. 7. It is concluded that, in kinesthetic tasks of this type, the discrimination of angular distance is more accurate than the discrimination of joint angle. We hypothesize that the nervous system extracts kinematic information related to both joint angle and angular distance from proprioceptors, and that the encoding and or decoding of angular distance is more accurate than that of absolute joint angle.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Functional Equivalence of Spatial Representations Derived From Vision and Language: Evidence From Allocentric Judgments.

Past research (e.g., J. M. Loomis, Y. Lippa, R. L. Klatzky, & R. G. Golledge, 2002) has indicated that spatial representations derived from spatial language can function equivalently to those derived from perception. The authors tested functional equivalence for reporting spatial relations that were not explicitly stated during learning. Participants learned a spatial layout by visual perception or spatial language and then made allocentric direction and distance judgments. Experiments 1 and 2 indicated allocentric relations could be accurately reported in all modalities, but visually perceived layouts, tested with or without vision, produced faster and less variable directional responses than language. In Experiment 3, when participants were forced to create a spatial image during learning (by spatially updating during a backward translation), functional equivalence of spatial language and visual perception was demonstrated by patterns of latency, systematic error, and variability. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)