Synthesis of defined polyhedral oligosilsesquioxane‐containing diblock and triblock methacrylate copolymers by atom transfer radical polymerization

Defined diblock and triblock copolymers composed of methyl methacrylate‐co‐glycidyl methacrylate block and 3‐{3,5,7,9,11,13,15‐hepta(2‐methylpropyl)‐pentacyclo[9.5.1.1^3,9.1^5,15.1^7,13]‐octasiloxan‐1‐yl}propyl methacrylate block(s), i.e., P(MMA‐co‐GMA)‐b‐PiBuPOSSMA and PiBuPOSSMA‐b‐P(MMA‐co‐GMA)‐b‐PiBuPOSSMA, were synthesized by atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP). First, monofunctional and bifunctional P(MMA‐co‐GMA) copolymers were synthesized by ATRP. Subsequently, these copolymers were successfully used as macroinitiators for ATRP of POSS‐containing methacrylate monomer. The process showed high initiation efficiency of macroinitiators and led to products with low dispersity. The synthesized block copolymers were characterized by size exclusion chromatography, ¹H‐NMR spectroscopy and their glass transition temperatures were determined by differential scanning calorimetry. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2013     

Poly(dimethylsiloxane‐b‐styrene) diblock copolymers prepared by reversible addition–fragmentation chain‐transfer polymerization: Synthesis and characterization

Well‐defined poly(dimethylsiloxane‐b‐styrene) diblock copolymers were prepared by reversible addition–fragmentation chain‐transfer (RAFT) polymerization. Monohydroxyl‐terminated polydimethylsiloxane was modified to form a functional polydimethylsiloxane/macro‐RAFT agent, which was reacted with styrene to form the diblock copolymers. The chemical compositions and structures of the copolymers were characterized by proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and gel permeation chromatography. The surface properties and morphology of the copolymers were investigated with static water contact‐angle measurements, X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy, transmission electron microscopy, and atomic force microscopy, which showed a low surface energy and microphase separation surfaces that were composed of hydrophobic domains from polydimethylsiloxane segments. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2010     

Synthesis and characterization of diblock,triblock, and multiblock copolymers containing poly(3‐hydroxy butyrate) units

A poly[(R,S)‐3‐hydroxybutyrate] macroinitiator (PHB‐MI) was obtained through the condensation reaction of poly[(R,S)‐3‐hydroxybutyrate] (PHB) oligomers containing dihydroxyl end functionalities with 4,4′‐azobis(4‐cyanopentanoyl chloride). The PHB‐MI obtained in this way had hydroxyl groups at two end of the polymer chain and an internal azo group. The synthesis of ABA‐type PHB‐b‐PMMA block copolymers [where A is poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and B is PHB] via PHB‐MI was accomplished in two steps. First, multiblock active copolymers with azo groups (PMMA‐PHB‐MI) were prepared through the redox free‐radical polymerization of methyl methacrylate (MMA) with a PHB‐MI/Ce(IV) redox system in aqueous nitric acid at 40°C. Second, PMMA‐PHB‐MI was used in the thermal polymerization of MMA at 60°C to obtain PHB‐b‐PMMA. When styrene (S) was used instead of MMA in the second step, ABCBA‐type PMMA‐b‐PHB‐b‐PS multiblock copolymers [where C is polystyrene (PS)] were obtained. In addition, the direct thermal polymerization of the monomers (MMA or S) via PHB‐MI provided AB‐type diblocks copolymers with MMA and BCB‐type triblock copolymers with S. The macroinitiators and block copolymers were characterized with ultraviolet–visible spectroscopy, nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, gel permeation chromatography, cryoscopic measurements, and thermogravimetric analysis. The increases in the intrinsic viscosity and fractional precipitation confirmed that a block copolymer had been obtained. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 94: 1789–1796, 2004     

pH- and temperature-responsive amphiphilic diblock copolymers of 4-vinylpyridine and oligoethyleneglycol methacrylate synthesized by RAFT polymerization

Diblock copolymers of 4-vinylpyridine (4VP) and oligoethyleneglycol methyl ether methacrylate (OEGMA) were synthesized for the first time using RAFT polymerization technique as potential drug delivery systems. Effects of the number of ethylene glycol units in OEGMA, chain length of hydrophobic P4VP block, pH, concentration and temperature on the solution behavior of the copolymers were investigated comprehensively. Copolymer chains formed micelles at pH values higher than 5 whereas unimeric polymers were observed to exist below pH 5, owing to the repulsion between positively charged P4VP blocks. The size of the micelles was dependent on the relative length of blocks, P4VP and POEGMA. Thermo-responsive properties of copolymers were investigated depending on the pH and length of P4VP block. The increase in the length of P4VP block decreased the LCST substantially at pH 7. At pH 3, LCST of copolymers shifted to higher temperatures due to the increased interaction of copolymers with water through positively charged P4VP block.     

Self‐assembled nanostructures: preparation,characterization, thermal,optical and morphological characteristics of amphiphilic diblock copolymers based on poly(2‐hydroxyethyl methacrylate‐block‐N‐phenylmaleimide)

A series of well‐defined amphiphilic poly[(2‐hydroxyethyl methacrylate)‐block‐(N‐phenylmaleimide)] diblock copolymers containing hydrophilic and hydrophobic blocks of different lengths were synthesized by atom transfer radical polymerization. The properties of the diblock copolymers and their ability to form large compound spherical micelles are described. Their optical, morphological and thermal properties and self‐assembled structure were also investigated. The chemical structure and composition of these copolymers have been characterized by elemental analysis, Fourier transform infrared, ¹H NMR, UV–visible and fluorescence spectroscopy, and size exclusion chromatography. Furthermore, the self‐assembly behavior of these copolymers was investigated by transmission electron microscopy and dynamic light scattering, which indicated that the amphiphilic diblock copolymer can self‐assemble into micelles, depending on the length of both blocks in the copolymers. These diblock copolymers gave rise to a variety of microstructures, from spherical micelles, hexagonal cylinders to lamellar phases. © 2013 Society of Chemical Industry     

Synthesis and characterization of poly(n‐butyl methacrylate)‐b‐polystyrene diblock copolymers by atom transfer radical emulsion polymerization

Poly(n‐butyl methacrylate) (PBMA)‐b‐polystyrene (PSt) diblock copolymers were synthesized by emulsion atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP). PBMA macroinitiators that contained alkyl bromide end groups were obtained by the emulsion ATRP of n‐butyl methacrylate with BrCH₃CHCOOC₂H₅ as the initiator; these were used to initiate the ATRP of styrene (St). The latter procedure was carried out at 85°C with CuCl/4,4′‐di(5‐nonyl)‐2,2′‐bipyridine as the catalyst and polyoxyethylene(23) lauryl ether as the surfactant. With this technique, PBMA‐b‐PSt diblock copolymers were synthesized. The polymerization was nearly controlled; the ATRP of St from the macroinitiators showed linear increases in number‐average molecular weight with conversion. The block copolymers were characterized with IR spectroscopy, ¹H‐NMR, and differential scanning calorimetry. The effects of the molecular weight of the macroinitiators, macroinitiator concentration, catalyst concentration, surfactant concentration, and temperature on the polymerization were also investigated. Thermodynamic data and activation parameters for the ATRP are also reported. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 98: 2123–2129, 2005     

Synthesis of diblock and triblock copolymers from butyl acrylate and styrene by reverse iodine transfer polymerization

Well‐defined AB and BA diblock copolymers were obtained by a one‐pot two‐step sequential block copolymerization by reverse iodine transfer polymerization (RITP), A being a poly(styrene) block and B a poly(butyl acrylate) block. High monomer conversions during the formation of the first block avoided the purification steps before growing the second block. In a third sequential step, the diblock copolymers were further extended to synthesize ABA and BAB triblock copolymers. Furthermore, the synthesis of ABA and BAB copolymers in only two steps by RITP was investigated starting with the formation of the central block using 2,5‐di(2‐ethylhexanoylperoxy)‐2,5‐dimethylhexane as a difunctional initiator and then resuming the polymerization to grow the external blocks in a second step. The obtained copolymers were analyzed by size exclusion chromatography, transmission electron microscopy, and differential scanning calorimetry. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011     

Doubly thermo-responsive brush-linear diblock copolymers and formation of core-shell-corona micelles

Doubly thermo-responsive brush-linear diblock copolymer of poly[poly(ethylene glycol) methyl ether vinylphenyl]-block-poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PmPEGV-b-PNIPAM) is prepared by RAFT polymerization. The obtained brush-linear diblock copolymer exhibits two lower critical solution temperatures (LCSTs) corresponding to the linear poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAM) block and the brush poly[poly(ethylene glycol) methyl ether vinylphenyl] (PmPEGV) block in water. This brush-linear diblock copolymer undergoes a two-step temperature sensitive micellization. At temperature above the first LCST, the brush-linear diblock copolymer self-assembles into core-corona micelles with the dehydrated PNIPAM block forming the core and the solvated brush PmPEGV block forming the corona. When temperature increases above the second LCST, the polystyrene backbone in the brush PmPEGV block collapses onto the dehydrated PNIPAM core to form core-shell-corona micelles, in which the dehydrated PNIPAM block forms the core, the collapsed polystyrene backbone in the brush PmPEGV block forms the shell and the solvated poly(ethylene glycol) side-chains forms the corona. The effect of the length of the PNIPAM block and the length of the poly(ethylene glycol) side-chains on the thermo-responsive micellization and the size of core-shell-corona micelles is investigated.     

Stereocomplex‐induced gelation properties of polylactide/poly(ethylene glycol) diblock and triblock copolymers

The ring‐opening polymerization of L ‐ or D ‐lactide was realized in the presence of dihydroxyl or monomethoxy poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) with a number‐average molecular weight of 2000. The resulting low‐molar‐mass poly(L ‐lactide) (PLLA)/PEG and poly(D ‐lactide) (PDLA)/PEG triblock and diblock copolymers were characterized with nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), differential scanning calorimetry, size‐exclusion chromatography, and X‐ray diffractometric analysis. Bioresorbable hydrogels were successfully prepared from aqueous solutions containing both copolymers because of interactions and stereocomplexation between the PLLA and PDLA blocks. Gelation was evaluated with the tube inverting method and rheological measurements. A phase diagram was realized with gel–sol transitions as a function of concentration. The rheological properties of the hydrogels were investigated under various conditions through changes in the copolymer concentration, temperature, time, and frequency. It was concluded that the hydrogels constituted a dynamic and evolutive system because of the continuous formation/destruction of crosslinks and degradation. Further studies are underway to elucidate the degradation behavior and the potential of these substances as drug carriers or cell culture scaffolds. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011     

New chemoenzymatic‐facilitated synthesis of diblock copolymers and biomedically appropriate vesicles

BACKGROUND: Biocatalytic approaches in polymer science are expected to further increase the diversity of polymeric materials. And the full exploitation of biocatalysis in polymer science will require the development of compatible chemoenzyme‐catalyzed methods. RESULTS: The well‐defined diblock copolymer poly(2,2,2‐trichloroethanol 10‐hydroxydecanate)‐block‐poly(glycidyl methacrylate) (P(TCE‐10‐HD)‐b‐PGMA) was obtained by combining enzymatic condensation polymerization and atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP). P(TCE‐10‐HD) was prepared by enzymatic condensation polymerization of 10‐hydroxydecanoic acid and 2,2,2‐trichloroethanol. This ? CCl₃‐terminated polyester permitted subsequent ATRP of glycidyl methacrylate. Kinetic studies indicated a ‘living’ controlled radical polymerization. The self‐assembly behavior of the amphiphilic diblock copolymer, in tetrahydrofuran/water, gave rise to aggregates with diameters ranging from 160 to 240 nm. The morphology of the assembly particles was studied using atomic force microscopy, transmission electron microscopy and scanning electron microscopy. CONCLUSION: To obtain the ATRP macromolecular initiator, this one‐step method is more convenient than other two‐step methods. The results of NMR, Fourier transform infrared and gel permeation chromatography analyses testified that this method is feasible. The formulated vesicles have great potential as biomedical materials. Copyright © 2008 Society of Chemical Industry     

Synthesis and properties of acrylate‐acrylic acid‐acrylate triblock copolymers with gemini structure by RAFT polymerization

A class of gemini structure block copolymers with a trithiocarbonate ester spacer group had been synthesized with S, S′‐bis (R, R′‐dimethylacetic acid) trithiocarbonate as reversible addition fragmentation chain transfer agents and acrylic acid as the second monomer. These triblock copolymers were characterized by ¹H NMR spectroscopy, gel permeation chromatography in terms of their compositions, molecular weights and behaviour at the air–water interface. The results showed that the weight‐average molecular weight was larger than theoretical molecular as the acrylate side chain increased. The polymer neutralized by sodium hydroxide solution had low critical micelle concentration which was <10^?2 mol L^?1 in water. TEM and DLS showed that it formed a special micelle structure with large pore structure which might lead to low surface tension and critical micelle concentration in water. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2016 , 133, 43017.     

Preparation and characterization of proton‐conducting crosslinked diblock copolymer membranes

The synthesis and properties of crosslinked diblock copolymers for use as proton‐conducting membranes are presented. A polystyrene‐b‐poly(hydroxyl ethyl methacrylate) diblock copolymer at 56 : 44 wt % was sequentially synthesized via atom transfer radical polymerization. The poly(hydroxyl ethyl methacrylate) (PHEMA) block was thermally crosslinked by sulfosuccinic acid (SA) via the esterification reaction between  OH of PHEMA and  COOH of SA. Proton nuclear magnetic resonance and Fourier transfer infrared spectra revealed the successful synthesis of the diblock copolymer and the crosslinking reaction under the thermal condition of 120°C for 1 h. The ion‐exchange capacity continuously increased from 0.25 to 0.98 mequiv/g with increasing SA concentration because of the increasing number of charged groups in the membrane. However, the water uptake increased up to an SA concentration of 7.6 wt %, above which it decreased monotonically (maximum water uptake ∼ 27.6%). The membrane also exhibited a maximum proton conductivity of 0.045 S/cm at an SA concentration of 15.2 wt %. The maximum behavior of the water uptake and proton conductivity with respect to the SA concentration was considered to be due to a competitive effect between the increase of ionic sites and the crosslinking reaction according to the SA concentration. All the membranes were thermally quite stable at least up to 250°C, presumably because of the block‐copolymer‐based, crosslinked structure of the membranes. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 2008     

Amphiphilic diblock copolymers poly(2‐hydroxyethylmethacrylate)‐b‐(N‐phenylmaleimide) and poly(2‐hydroxyethylmethacrylate)‐b‐(styrene) using the macroinitiator poly(HEMA)‐Cl by ATRP: Preparation,characterization, and thermal properties

In recent years, much attention has been given to the development of specialty polymers from useful materials. In this context, amphiphilic block copolymers were prepared by atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) of N‐phenylmaleimide (N‐PhMI) or styrene using a poly(2‐hydroxyethylmethacrylate)‐Cl macroinitiator/CuBr/bipyridine initiating system. The macroinitiator P(HEMA)‐Cl was directly prepared in toluene by reverse ATRP using BPO/FeCl₃ 6 H₂O/PPh₃ as initiating system. The microstructure of the block copolymers were characterized using FTIR, ¹H‐NMR, ¹³C‐NMR spectroscopic techniques and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The thermal behavior was studied by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and thermogravimetry (TG). The theoretical number average molecular weight (M_n,th) was calculated from the feed capacity. The microphotographs of the film's surfaces show that the film's top surfaces were generally smooth. The TDT of the block copolymer P(HEMA)₈₀‐b‐P(N‐PhMI)₂₀ and P(HEMA)₉₀‐b‐P(St)₁₀ of about 290°C was also lower than that found for the macroi′nitiator poly(HEMA)‐Cl. The block copolymers exhibited only one T_g before thermal decomposition, which could be attributed to the low molar content of the N‐PhMI or St blocks respectively. This result also indicates that the phase behavior of the copolymers is predominately determined by the HEMA block. The curves reveal that the polymers show phase transition behavior of amorphous polymers. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2010     

Aggregation behaviour of well defined amphiphilic diblock copolymers with poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) and hydrophobic blocks

Series of amphiphilic diblock copolymers with poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) as a hydrophilic block and a hydrophobic block consisting of either polystyrene or poly(tert-butyl methacrylate) were synthesised using RAFT polymerisations. Differential scanning calorimetry showed the chemically different blocks being phase separated in dry polymers. Light scattering and microcalorimetry studies were performed on aqueous solutions to investigate the phase behavior of the diblock copolymers. By carefully transferring the polymers from an organic solvent to water, either micellar particles or large aggregates were obtained depending on the relative lengths of the blocks. Large aggregates collapsed upon heating, whereas collapse occurred slowly within a broad temperature range in the case of micelle like structures. However, microcalorimetrically the collapse of the PNIPAM chains was observed to take place in all samples, suggesting that the shells of the micellar particles are crowded in a way which hinders the compression of the poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) chains.     

Synthesis and characterization of polystyrene/poly(4‐vinylpyridine) triblock copolymers by reversible addition–fragmentation chain transfer polymerization and their self‐assembled aggregates in water

Reversible addition–fragmentation chain transfer polymerization (RAFT) was developed for the controlled preparation of polystyrene (PS)/poly(4‐vinylpyridine) (P4VP) triblock copolymers. First, PS and P4VP homopolymers were prepared using dibenzyl trithiocarbonate as the chain transfer agent (CTA). Then, PS‐b‐P4VP‐b‐PS and P4VP‐b‐PS‐b‐P4VP triblock copolymers were synthesized using as macro‐CTA the obtained homopolymers PS and P4VP, respectively. The synthesized polymers had relatively narrower molecular weight distributions (M_w/M_n < 1.25), and the polymerization was controlled/living. Furthermore, the polymerization rate appeared to be lower when styrene was polymerized using P4VP as the macro‐CTA, compared with polymerizing 4‐vinylpyridine using PS as the macro‐CTA. This was attributed to the different transfer constants of the P4VP and PS macro‐CTAs to the styrene and the 4‐vinylpyridine, respectively. The aggregates of the triblock copolymers with different compositions and chain architectures in water also were investigated, and the results are presented. Reducing the P4VP block length and keeping the PS block constant favored the formation of rod aggregates. Moreover, the chain architecture in which the P4VP block was in the middle of the copolymer chain was rather favorable to the rod assembly because of the entropic penalty associated with the looping of the middle‐block P4VP to form the aggregate corona and tailing of the end‐block PS into the core of the aggregates. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 89: 1017–1025, 2003     

Poly(dimethylsiloxane‐b‐styrene) diblock copolymers prepared by reversible addition‐fragmentation chain transfer polymerization: Kinetic model

Well‐defined polydimethylsiloxane‐block‐polystyrene (PDMS‐b‐PS) diblock copolymers were prepared by reversible addition‐fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) polymerization using a functional PDMS‐macro RAFT agent. The RAFT polymerization kinetics was simulated by a mathematical model for the RAFT polymerization in a batch reactor based on the method of moments. The model described molecular weight, monomer conversion, and polydispersity index as a function of polymerization time. Good agreements in the polymerization kinetics were achieved for fitting the kinetic profiles with the developed model. In addition, the model was used to predict the effects of initiator concentration, chain transfer agent concentration, and monomer concentration on the RAFT polymerization kinetics. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011     

Solid and thermal properties of ABA‐type triblock copolymers designed using difunctional fluorine‐containing polyimide macroinitiators with methyl methacrylate

BACKGROUND: ABA‐type poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and fluorine‐containing polyimide triblock copolymers are potentially beneficial for electric materials. In the work reported here, triblock copolymers with various block lengths were prepared from fluorine‐containing difunctional polyimide macroinitiators and methyl methacrylate monomer through atom‐transfer radical polymerization. The effects of structure on their solid and thermal properties were studied. RESULTS: The weight ratios of the triblock copolymers derived using thermogravimetric analysis were shown to be almost identical to the ratios determined using ¹H NMR. The solid properties (film density and maximum d‐spacing value) and thermal properties (glass transition and thermal expansion) were shown to be strongly dependent on the weight ratios of both PMMA and polyimide components. Furthermore, a porous film, which showed a lower dielectric constant of 2.48 at 1 MHz, could be prepared by heating a triblock copolymer film to induce the thermal degradation of the PMMA component. CONCLUSION: The use of the polyimide macroinitiator was useful in the preparation of ABA‐type triblock copolymers to control each block length that influences the solid and thermal properties. Additionally, the triblock copolymers have great potential in preparing porous polyimides in the application of electric materials as interlayer insulation membranes of large‐scale integration. Copyright © 2009 Society of Chemical Industry     

Syntheses of triblock polybutadiene–polydimethylsiloxane copolymers by coupling reactions

The reaction of epoxy‐telechelic polydimethylsiloxanes with polybutadienyllithium was used to prepare a series of low‐molecular‐weight polybutadiene‐block‐polydimethylsiloxane‐block‐polybutadiene copolymers. The copolymers were purified by repeated fractional precipitation/centrifugation and characterized with NMR, vapor pressure osmometry, size exclusion chromatography, and elemental analysis. The applicability of this method is discussed. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 101: 3233–3240, 2006     

Nitroxide‐mediated synthesis of styrenic‐based segmented and tapered block copolymers using poly(lactide)‐functionalized TEMPO macromediators

Poly(styrene)‐poly(lactide) (PS‐PLA), poly (tert‐butyl styrene)‐poly(lactide) (PtBuS‐PLA) diblocks, and poly(tert‐butyl styrene)‐poly(styrene)‐poly(lactide) (PtBuS‐PS‐PLA) segmented and tapered triblocks of controlled segment lengths were synthesized using nitroxide‐mediated controlled radical polymerization. Well‐defined PLA‐functionalized macromediators derived from hydroxyl terminated TEMPO (PLA_T) of various molecular weights mediated polymerizations of the styrenic monomers in bulk and in dimethylformamide (DMF) solution at 120–130°C. PS‐PLA and PtBuS‐PLA diblocks were characterized by narrow molecular weight distributions (polydispersity index (M_w/M_n) < 1.3) when using the PLA_T mediator with the lowest number average molecular weight M_n= 6.1 kg/mol while broader molecular weight distributions were exhibited (M_w/M_n = 1.47‐1.65) when using higher molecular weight mediators (M_n = 7.4 kg/mol and 11.3 kg/mol). Segmented PtBuS‐PS‐PLA triblocks were initiated cleanly from PtBuS‐PLA diblocks although polymerizations were very rapid with PS segments ～ 5–10 kg/mol added within 3–10 min of polymerization at 130°C in 50 wt % DMF solution. Tapering from the PtBuS to the PS segment in semibatch mode at a lower temperature of 120°C and in 50 wt % DMF solution was effective in incorporating a short random segment of PtBuS‐ran‐PS while maintaining a relatively narrow monomodal molecular weight distribution (M_w/M_n ≈ 1.5). © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 2008     

4‐Halogeno‐3,5‐dimethyl‐1H‐pyrazole‐1‐carbodithioates: versatile reversible addition fragmentation chain transfer agents with broad applicability

Pyrazole‐based dithiocarbamates are versatile reversible addition fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) agents that provide molar mass and dispersity (? ) control over the radical polymerization of both more and less activated monomers (MAMs and LAMs). In this paper we report on theoretical and experimental findings demonstrating that their activity as RAFT agents can be significantly enhanced by introducing electron‐withdrawing substituents to the pyrazole ring. This enhancement is most noticeable in methyl methacrylate polymerization where product molar masses are more accurately predicted by the RAFT agent concentration, and significantly lower ? values, with respect to those seen with the parent RAFT agent under similar conditions, are observed. Thus, use of 4‐chloro‐3,5‐dimethyl‐1H ‐pyrazole‐1‐carbodithioate provides a poly(methyl methacrylate) with the anticipated molar mass and ? as low as 1.3 at high monomer conversion. Good control is retained for monosubstituted MAMs, styrene, methyl acrylate and N ,N ‐dimethylacrylamide. Low dispersities and less molar mass control are also achieved for homo‐ and copolymerizations with the LAM vinyl acetate, albeit with some retardation. © 2017 The Authors. Polymer International published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.