GluN2B‐Selective N‐Methyl‐d‐aspartate (NMDA) Receptor Antagonists Derived from 3‐Benzazepines: Synthesis and Pharmacological Evaluation of Benzo[7]annulen‐7‐amines

Given their high neuroprotective potential, ligands that block GluN2B‐containing N‐methyl‐D ‐aspartate (NMDA) receptors by interacting with the ifenprodil binding site located on the GluN2B subunit are of great interest for the treatment of various neuronal disorders. In this study, a novel class of GluN2B‐selective NMDA receptor antagonists with the benzo[7]annulene scaffold was prepared and pharmacologically evaluated. The key intermediate, N‐(2‐methoxy‐5‐oxo‐6,7,8,9‐tetrahydro‐5H‐benzo[7]annulen‐7‐yl)acetamide ( 11 ), was obtained by cyclization of 3‐acetamido‐5‐(3‐methoxyphenyl)pentanoic acid ( 10 b ). The final reaction steps comprise hydrolysis of the amide, reduction of the ketone, and reductive alkylation, leading to cis‐ and trans‐configured 7‐(ω‐phenylalkylamino)benzo[7]annulen‐5‐ols. High GluN2B affinity was observed with cis‐configured γ‐amino alcohols substituted with a 3‐phenylpropyl moiety at the amino group. Removal of the benzylic hydroxy moiety led to the most potent GluN2B antagonists of this series: 2‐methoxy‐N‐(3‐phenylpropyl)‐6,7,8,9‐tetrahydro‐5H‐benzo[7]annulen‐7‐amine ( 20 a , K_i=10 nM ) and 2‐methoxy‐N‐methyl‐N‐(3‐phenylpropyl)‐6,7,8,9‐tetrahydro‐5H‐benzo[7]annulen‐7‐amine ( 23 a , K_i=7.9 nM ). The selectivity over related receptors (phencyclidine binding site of the NMDA receptor, σ₁ and σ₂ receptors) was recorded. In a functional assay measuring the cytoprotective activity of the benzo[7]annulenamines, all tested compounds showed potent NMDA receptor antagonistic activity. Cytotoxicity induced via GluN2A subunit‐containing NMDA receptors was not inhibited by the new ligands.     

Synthesis and Pharmacological Evaluation of Enantiomerically Pure GluN2B Selective NMDA Receptor Antagonists

To determine the eutomers of potent GluN2B‐selective N‐methyl‐d ‐aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists with a 3‐benzazepine scaffold, 7‐benzyloxy‐3‐(4‐phenylbutyl)‐2,3,4,5‐tetrahydro‐1H‐3‐benzazepin‐1‐ols (S)‐ 2 and (R)‐ 2 were separated by chiral HPLC. Hydrogenolysis and subsequent methylation of the enantiomerically pure benzyl ethers of (S)‐ 2 and (R)‐ 2 provided the enantiomeric phenols (S)‐ 3 and (R)‐ 3 [3‐(4‐phenylbutyl)‐2,3,4,5‐tetrahydro‐1H‐3‐benzazepine‐1,7‐diol] and methyl ethers (S)‐ 4 and (R)‐ 4 . All enantiomers were obtained with high enantiomeric purity (≥99.7 % ee). The absolute configurations were determined by CD spectroscopy. R‐configured enantiomers turned out to be the eutomers in receptor binding studies and two‐electrode voltage clamp experiments. The most promising ligand of this compound series is the R‐configured phenol (R)‐ 3 , displaying high GluN2B affinity (K_i=30 nm ), high inhibition of ion flux (IC₅₀=61 nm ), and high cytoprotective activity (IC₅₀=93 nm ). Whereas the eudismic ratio in the receptor binding assay is 25, the eudismic ratio in the electrophysiological experiment is 3.     

Synthesis, σ Receptor Affinity,and Pharmacological Evaluation of 5‐Phenylsulfanyl‐ and 5‐Benzyl‐Substituted Tetrahydro‐2‐benzazepines

In accordance with a novel strategy for generating the 2‐benzazepine scaffold by connecting C6–C1 and C3–N building blocks, a set of 5‐phenylsulfanyl‐ and 5‐benzyl‐substituted tetrahydro‐2‐benzazepines was synthesized and pharmacologically evaluated. Key steps of the synthesis were the Heck reaction, the Stetter reaction, a reductive cyclization, and the introduction of diverse N substituents at the end of the synthesis. High σ₁ affinity was achieved for 2‐benzazepines with linear or branched alk(en)yl residues containing at least an n‐butyl substructure. The butyl‐ and 4‐fluorobenzyl‐substituted derivatives, (±)‐5‐benzyl‐2‐butyl‐2,3,4,5‐tetrahydro‐1H‐2‐benzazepine ( 19 b ) and (±)‐5‐benzyl‐2‐(4‐fluorobenzyl)‐2,3,4,5‐tetrahydro‐1H‐2‐benzazepine ( 19 m ), show high selectivity over more than 50 other relevant targets, including the σ₂ subtype and various binding sites of the N‐methyl‐D ‐aspartate (NMDA) receptor. In the Irwin screen, 19 b and 19 m showed clean profiles without inducing considerable side effects. Compounds 19 b and 19 m did not reveal significant analgesic and cognition‐enhancing activity. Compound 19 m did not have any antidepressant‐like effects in mice.     

Stereocontrolled Synthesis and Pharmacological Evaluation of Azetidine‐2,3‐Dicarboxylic Acids at NMDA Receptors

The four stereoisomers of azetidine‐2,3‐dicaroxylic acid (L ‐trans‐ADC, L ‐cis‐ADC, D ‐trans‐ADC, and D ‐cis‐ADC) were synthesized in a stereocontrolled fashion following two distinct strategies: one providing the two cis‐ADC enantiomers and one giving access to the two trans‐ADC enantiomers. The four azetidinic amino acids were characterized in a radioligand binding assay ([³H]CGP39653) at native NMDA receptors: L ‐trans‐ADC showed the highest affinity (K_i=10 μM ) followed by the D ‐cis‐ADC stereoisomer (21 μM ). In contrast, the two analogues L ‐cis‐ADC and D ‐trans‐ADC were low‐affinity ligands (>100 and 90 μM , respectively). Electrophysiological characterization of the ADC compounds at the four NMDA receptor subtypes NR1/NR2A, NR1/NR2B, NR1/NR2C, and NR1/NR2D expressed in Xenopus oocytes showed that L ‐trans‐ADC displayed the highest agonist potency at NR1/NR2D (EC₅₀=50 μM ), which was 9.4‐, 3.4‐, and 1.9‐fold higher than the respective potencies at NR1/NR2A–C. D ‐cis‐ADC was shown to be a partial agonist at NR1/NR2C and NR1/NR2D with medium‐range micromolar potencies (EC₅₀=720 and 230 μM , respectively). A subsequent in silico ligand–protein docking study suggested an unusual binding mode for these amino acids in the agonist binding site.     

Evaluation of (4‐Arylpiperidin‐1‐yl)cyclopentanecarboxamides As High‐Affinity and Long‐Residence‐Time Antagonists for the CCR2 Receptor

Animal models suggest that the chemokine ligand 2/CC‐chemokine receptor 2 (CCL2/CCR2) axis plays an important role in the development of inflammatory diseases. However, CCR2 antagonists have failed in clinical trials because of a lack of efficacy. We previously described a new approach for the design of CCR2 antagonists by the use of structure–kinetics relationships (SKRs). Herein we report new findings on the structure–affinity relationships (SARs) and SKRs of the reference compound MK‐0483, its diastereomers, and its structural analogues as CCR2 antagonists. The SARs of the 4‐arylpiperidine group suggest that lipophilic hydrogen‐bond‐accepting substituents at the 3‐position are favorable. However, the SKRs suggest that a lipophilic group with a certain size is desired [e.g., 3‐Br: K_i=2.8 nM , residence time (t_res)=243 min; 3‐iPr: K_i=3.6 nM , t_res=266 min]. Alternatively, additional substituents and further optimization of the molecule, while keeping a carboxylic acid at the 3‐position, can also prolong t_res; this was most prominently observed in MK‐0483 (K_i=1.2 nM , t_res=724 min) and a close analogue (K_i=7.8 nM ) with a short residence time.     

Probing the Peptidylglycine α‐Hydroxylating Monooxygenase Active Site with Novel 4‐Phenyl‐3‐butenoic Acid Based Inhibitors

Specific inhibition of the copper‐containing peptidylglycine α‐hydroxylating monooxygenase (PHM), which catalyzes the post‐translational modification of peptides involved in carcinogenesis and tumor progression, constitutes a new approach for combating cancer. We carried out a structure–activity study of new compounds derived from a well‐known PHM substrate analogue, the olefinic compound 4‐phenyl‐3‐butenoic acid (PBA). We designed, synthesized, and tested various PBA derivatives both in vitro and in silico. We show that it is possible to increase PBA affinity for PHM by appropriate functionalization of its aromatic nucleus. Compound 2 d , for example, bears a meta‐benzyloxy substituent, and exhibits better inhibition features (K_i=3.9 μM , k_inact/K_i=427 M ^?1 s^?1) than the parent PBA (K_i=19 μM , k_inact/K_i=82 M ^?1 s^?1). Docking calculations also suggest two different binding modes for PBA derivatives; these results will aid in the development of further PHM inhibitors with improved features.     

Chemoenzymatic Synthesis of GDP‐L‐Fucose Derivatives as Potent and Selective α‐1,3‐Fucosyltransferase Inhibitors

Fucosyltransferases (FucTs) usually catalyze the final step of glycosylation and are critical to many biological processes. High levels of specific FucT activities are often associated with various cancers. Here we report the development of a chemoenzymatic method for synthesizing a library of guanosine diphosphate β‐L ‐fucose (GDP‐Fuc) derivatives, followed by in situ screening for inhibitory activity against bacterial and human α‐1,3‐FucTs. Several compounds incorporating appropriate hydrophobic moieties were identified from the initial screening. These were individually synthesized, purified and characterized in detail for their inhibition kinetics. Compound 5 had a K_i of 29 nM for human FucT‐VI, and is 269 and 11 times more selective than for Helicobacter pylori FucT (K_i=7.8 μM) and for human FucT‐V (K_i=0.31 μM).     

Diaryl‐Substituted Azolylthioacetamides: Inhibitor Discovery of New Delhi Metallo‐β‐Lactamase‐1 (NDM‐1)

The emergence and spread of antibiotic‐resistant pathogens is a global public health problem. Metallo‐β‐lactamases (MβLs) such as New Delhi MβL‐1 (NDM‐1) are principle contributors to the emergence of resistance because of their ability to hydrolyze almost all known β‐lactam antibiotics including penicillins, cephalosporins, and carbapenems. A clinical inhibitor of MBLs has not yet been found. In this study we developed eighteen new diaryl‐substituted azolylthioacetamides and found all of them to be inhibitors of the MβL L1 from Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (K_i<2 μM ), thirteen to be mixed inhibitors of NDM‐1 (K_i<7 μM ), and four to be broad‐spectrum inhibitors of all four tested MβLs CcrA from Bacteroides fragilis, NDM‐1 and ImiS from Aeromonas veronii, and L1 (K_i<52 μM ), which are representative of the B1a, B1b, B2, and B3 subclasses, respectively. Docking studies revealed that the azolylthioacetamides, which have the broadest inhibitory activity, coordinate to the Zn^II ion(s) preferentially via the triazole moiety, while other moieties interact mostly with the conserved active site residues Lys224 (CcrA, NDM‐1, and ImiS) or Ser221 (L1).     

8‐Benzyltetrahydropyrazino[2,1‐f]purinediones: Water‐Soluble Tricyclic Xanthine Derivatives as Multitarget Drugs for Neurodegenerative Diseases

8‐Benzyl‐substituted tetrahydropyrazino[2,1‐f]purinediones were designed as tricyclic xanthine derivatives containing a basic nitrogen atom in the tetrahydropyrazine ring to improve water solubility. A library of 69 derivatives was prepared and evaluated in radioligand binding studies at adenosine receptor (AR) subtypes and for their ability to inhibit monoamine oxidases (MAO). Potent dual‐target‐directed A₁/A_2A adenosine receptor antagonists were identified. Several compounds showed triple‐target inhibition; one of the best compounds was 8‐(2,4‐dichloro‐5‐fluorobenzyl)‐1,3‐dimethyl‐6,7,8,9‐tetrahydropyrazino[2,1‐f]purine‐2,4(1H,3H)‐dione ( 72 ) (human AR: K_i A₁ 217 nM , A_2A 233 nM ; IC₅₀ MAO‐B: 508 nM ). Dichlorinated compound 36 [8‐(3,4‐dichlorobenzyl)‐1,3‐dimethyl‐6,7,8,9‐tetrahydropyrazino[2,1‐f]purine‐2,4(1H,3H)‐dione] was found to be the best triple‐target drug in rat (K_i A₁ 351 nM , A_2A 322 nm; IC₅₀ MAO‐B: 260 nM ), and may serve as a useful tool for preclinical proof‐of‐principle studies. Compounds that act at multiple targets relevant for symptomatic as well as disease‐modifying treatment of neurodegenerative diseases are expected to show advantages over single‐target therapeutics.     

MAO Inhibitory Activity of 2‐Arylbenzofurans versus 3‐Arylcoumarins: Synthesis,in vitro Study,and Docking Calculations

Monoamine oxidase (MAO) is an important drug target for the treatment of neurological disorders. Several 3‐arylcoumarin derivatives were previously described as interesting selective MAO‐B inhibitors. Preserving the trans‐stilbene structure, a series of 2‐arylbenzofuran and corresponding 3‐arylcoumarin derivatives were synthesized and evaluated as inhibitors of both MAO isoforms, MAO‐A and MAO‐B. In general, both types of derivatives were found to be selective MAO‐B inhibitors, with IC₅₀ values in the nano‐ to micromolar range. 5‐Nitro‐2‐(4‐methoxyphenyl)benzofuran ( 8 ) is the most active compound of the benzofuran series, presenting MAO‐B selectivity and reversible inhibition (IC₅₀=140 nM ). 3‐(4′‐Methoxyphenyl)‐6‐nitrocoumarin ( 15 ), with the same substitution pattern as that of compound 8 , was found to be the most active MAO‐B inhibitor of the coumarin series (IC₅₀=3 nM ). However, 3‐phenylcoumarin 14 showed activity in the same range (IC₅₀=6 nM ), is reversible, and also severalfold more selective than compound 15 . Docking experiments for the most active compounds into the MAO‐B and MAO‐A binding pockets highlighted different interactions between the derivative classes (2‐arylbenzofurans and 3‐arylcoumarins), and provided new information about the enzyme–inhibitor interaction and the potential therapeutic application of these scaffolds.     

Development of 3‐Phenyl‐N‐(2‐(3‐phenylureido)ethyl)‐thiophene‐2‐sulfonamide Compounds as Inhibitors of Antiapoptotic Bcl‐2 Family Proteins

Antiapoptotic Bcl‐2 family proteins, such as Bcl‐x_L, Bcl‐2, and Mcl‐1, are often overexpressed in tumor cells, which contributes to tumor cell resistance to chemotherapies and radiotherapies. Inhibitors of these proteins thus have potential applications in cancer treatment. We discovered, through structure‐based virtual screening, a lead compound with micromolar binding affinity to Mcl‐1 (inhibition constant (K_i)=3 μM ). It contains a phenyltetrazole and a hydrazinecarbothioamide moiety, and it represents a structural scaffold not observed among known Bcl‐2 inhibitors. This work presents the structural optimization of this lead compound. By following the scaffold‐hopping strategy, we have designed and synthesized a total of 82 compounds in three sets. All of the compounds were evaluated in a fluorescence‐polarization binding assay to measure their binding affinities to Bcl‐x_L, Bcl‐2, and Mcl‐1. Some of the compounds with a 3‐phenylthiophene‐2‐sulfonamide core moiety showed sub‐micromolar binding affinities to Mcl‐1 (K_i=0.3–0.4 μM ) or Bcl‐2 (K_i≈1 μM ). They also showed obvious cytotoxicity on tumor cells (IC₅₀<10 μM ). Two‐dimensional heteronuclear single quantum coherence NMR spectra of three selected compounds, that is, YCW‐E5, YCW‐E10, and YCW‐E11, indicated that they bind to the BH3‐binding groove on Bcl‐x_L in a similar mode to ABT‐737. Several apoptotic assays conducted on HL‐60 cells demonstrated that these compounds are able to induce cell apoptosis through the mitochondrial pathway. We propose that the compounds with the 3‐phenylthiophene‐2‐sulfonamide core moiety are worth further optimization as effective apoptosis inducers with an interesting selectivity towards Mcl‐1 and Bcl‐2.     

Two‐Face,Two‐Turn α‐Helix Mimetics Based on a Cross‐Acridine Scaffold: Analogues of the Bim BH3 Domain

The design of a cross‐acridine scaffold mimicking the i, i+3, i+5, and i+7 residues distributed over a two‐face, two‐turn α‐helix is described. Docking studies and 2D ¹H,¹⁵N HSQC NMR spectroscopy provide compelling evidence that compound 3 d accurately reproduces the arrangement of four hotspots in the Bim BH3 peptide to permit binding to the Mcl‐1 and Bcl‐2 proteins (K_i 0.079 and 0.056 μM , respectively). Furthermore, the hotspot mutation could also be mimicked by individual or multiple deletions of side chains on the scaffold.     

Potent,Metabolically Stable 2‐Alkyl‐8‐(2H‐1,2,3‐triazol‐2‐yl)‐9H‐adenines as Adenosine A2A Receptor Ligands

Inhibition of adenosine A_2A receptors has been shown to elicit a therapeutic response in preclinical animal models of Parkinson’s disease (PD). We previously identified the triazolo‐9H‐purine, ST1535, as a potent A_2AR antagonist. Studies revealed that ST1535 is extensively hydroxylated at the ω‐1 position of the butyl side chain. Here, we describe the synthesis and evaluation of derivatives in which the ω‐1 position has been substituted (F, Me, OH) in order to block metabolism. The stability of the compounds was evaluated in human liver microsomes (HLM), and the affinity for A_2AR was determined. Two compounds, (2‐(3,3‐dimethylbutyl)‐9‐methyl‐8‐(2H‐1,2,3‐triazol‐2‐yl)‐9H‐purin‐6‐amine ( 3 b ) and 4‐(6‐amino‐9‐methyl‐8‐(2H‐1,2,3‐triazol‐2‐yl)‐9H‐purin‐2‐yl)‐2‐methylbutan‐2‐ol ( 3 c ), exhibited good affinity against A_2AR (K_i=0.4 nM and 2 nM , respectively) and high in vitro metabolic stability (89.5 % and 95.3 % recovery, respectively, after incubation with HLM for two hours).     

Structural Exploration of (3S,6S)‐6‐Benzhydryl‐N‐benzyltetrahydro‐2H‐pyran‐3‐amine Analogues: Identification of Potent Triple Monoamine Reuptake Inhibitors as Potential Antidepressants

To further explore the basic structural motifs (3S,6S)‐6‐benzhydryl‐N‐benzyltetrahydro‐2H‐pyran‐3‐amine and (2S,4R,5R)‐2‐benzhydryl‐5‐(benzylamino)tetrahydro‐2H‐pyran‐4‐ol, developed by our research group, for monoamine transport inhibition, we designed and synthesized various structurally altered analogues. The new compounds were tested for their affinities for the dopamine transporter (DAT), the serotonin transporter (SERT), and the norepinephrine transporter (NET) in rat brain by measuring their capacity to inhibit the uptake of [³H]DA, [³H]5‐HT, and [³H]NE, respectively. Our results point to novel compounds with a TUI, DNRI, SNRI, or SSRI profile. Among the TUIs, compound 2 g exhibited a balanced potency for all three monoamine transporters (K_i: 60, 79, and 70.3 nM for DAT, SERT, and NET, respectively). In the rat forced swim test, compound 2 g produced a significant decrease in immobility in drug‐treated rats relative to vehicle, indicating a potential antidepressant property.     

Synthesis,Crystal Structure,and Thermal Behaviors of 3‐Nitro‐1,5‐bis(4,4′‐dimethylazide)‐1,2,3‐triazolyl‐3‐azapentane (NDTAP)

The energetic material, 3‐nitro‐1,5‐bis(4,4′‐dimethyl azide)‐1,2,3‐triazolyl‐3‐azapentane (NDTAP), was firstly synthesized by means of Click Chemistry using 1,5‐diazido‐3‐nitrazapentane as main material. The structure of NDTAP was confirmed by IR, ¹H NMR, and ¹³C NMR spectroscopy; mass spectrometry, and elemental analysis. The crystal structure of NDTAP was determined by X‐ray diffraction. It belongs to monoclinic system, space group C2/c with crystal parameters a=1.7285(8) nm, b=0.6061(3) nm, c=1.6712(8) nm, β=104.846(8)°, V=1.6924(13) nm³, Z=8, μ=0.109 mm⁻¹, F(000)=752, and D_c=1.422 g cm⁻³. The thermal behavior and non‐isothermal decomposition kinetics of NDTAP were studied with DSC and TG‐DTG methods. The self‐accelerating decomposition temperature and critical temperature of thermal explosion are 195.5 and 208.2 °C, respectively. NDTAP presents good thermal stability and is insensitive.     

A Novel Competitive Class of α‐Glucosidase Inhibitors: (E)‐1‐Phenyl‐3‐(4‐Styrylphenyl)Urea Derivatives

Competitive glycosidase inhibitors are generally sugar mimics that are costly and tedious to obtain because they require challenging and elongated chemical synthesis, which must be stereo‐ and regiocontrolled. Here, we show that readily accessible achiral (E)‐1‐phenyl‐3‐(4‐strylphenyl)ureas are potent competitive α‐glucosidase inhibitors. A systematic synthesis study shows that the 1‐phenyl moiety on the urea is critical for ensuring competitive inhibition, and substituents on both terminal phenyl groups contribute to inhibition potency. The most potent inhibitor, compound 12 (IC₅₀=8.4 μM , K_i=3.2 μM ), manifested a simple slow‐binding inhibition profile for α‐glucosidase with the kinetic parameters k₃=0.005256 μM ^?1 min^?1, k₄=0.003024 min^?1, and ${K{{{\rm app}\hfill \atop {\rm i}\hfill}}}$ =0.5753 μM .     

Highly potent and selective 4,4'‐biphenyl‐4‐acylate‐4'‐N‐n‐butylcarbamate inhibitors of Pseudomonas species lipase

4,4'‐Biphenyl‐4‐acylate‐4'‐N‐n‐butylcarbamates ( 1–8 ) are synthesized and characterized as highly potent and selective pseudo‐substrate inhibitors of Pseudomonas species lipase. Thus, the n‐butylcarbamate moieties of the inhibitors bind to the first acyl chain binding site (ACS) of the enzyme. Therefore, the ester moieties of the inhibitors may bind to the second ACS of the enzyme, due to the linear 4,4'‐biphenyl moiety of the inhibitors. –logK_i, logk₂, and logk_i values of carbamates 1–8 are multiply linearly correlated with the Taft steric constant (E_S) and the Hansch hydrophobicity constant (π), but not with the Taft substituent constant (σ*). For –logK_i, logk₂, and logk_i correlations, values of δ are 0.8, 0.34, and 1.0, respectively, and values of ψ are 1.0, 0.4, and 1.3, respectively. Positive δ and ψ values for these correlations indicate that the second ACS of the enzyme prefers to bind to small and hydrophobic ester groups of the inhibitors. Among carbamates 1–8 , carbamate 3 , with a K_i value of 2.5 nM, is the most potent inhibitor.     

E‐64c‐Hydrazide: A Lead Structure for the Development of Irreversible Cathepsin C Inhibitors

Cathepsin C is a papain‐like cysteine protease with dipeptidyl aminopeptidase activity that is thought to activate various granule‐associated serine proteases. Its exopeptidase activity is structurally explained by the so‐called exclusion domain, which blocks the active‐site cleft beyond the S2 site and, with its Asp 1 residue, provides an anchoring point for the N terminus of peptide and protein substrates. Here, the hydrazide of (2S,3S)‐trans‐epoxysuccinyl‐L ‐leucylamido‐3‐methylbutane (E‐64c) (k₂/K_i=140±5 M ^?1 s^?1) is demonstrated to be a lead structure for the development of irreversible cathepsin C inhibitors. The distal amino group of the hydrazide moiety addresses the acidic Asp 1 residue at the entrance of the S2 pocket by hydrogen bonding while also occupying the flat hydrophobic S1′–S2′ area with its leucine‐isoamylamide moiety. Furthermore, structure–activity relationship studies revealed that functionalization of this distal amino group with alkyl residues can be used to occupy the conserved hydrophobic S2 pocket. In particular, the n‐butyl derivative was identified as the most potent inhibitor of the series (k₂/K_i=56 000±1700 M ^?1 s^?1).     

6,7‐Dimethoxy‐2‐{2‐[4‐(1H‐1,2,3‐triazol‐1‐yl)phenyl]ethyl}‐1,2,3,4‐tetrahydroisoquinolines as Superior Reversal Agents for P‐Glycoprotein‐Mediated Multidrug Resistance

P‐glycoprotein (P‐gp)‐mediated multidrug resistance (MDR) is a major obstacle for successful cancer chemotherapy. Based on our previous study, 17 novel compounds with the 6,7‐dimethoxy‐2‐{2‐[4‐(1H‐1,2,3‐triazol‐1‐yl)phenyl]ethyl}‐1,2,3,4‐tetrahydroisoquinoline scaffold were designed and synthesized. Among them, 2‐[(1‐{4‐[2‐(6,7‐dimethoxy‐3,4‐dihydroisoquinolin‐2(1H)‐yl)ethyl]phenyl}‐1H‐1,2,3‐triazol‐4‐yl)methoxy]‐N‐(p‐tolyl)benzamide (compound 7 h ) was identified as a potent modulator of P‐gp‐mediated MDR, with high potency (EC₅₀=127.5±9.1 nM ), low cytotoxicity (TI>784.3), and long duration (>24 h) in reversing doxorubicin (DOX) resistance in K562/A02 cells. Compound 7 h also enhanced the effects of other MDR‐related cytotoxic agents (paclitaxel, vinblastine, and daunorubicin), increased the accumulation of DOX and blocked P‐gp‐mediated rhodamine 123 efflux function in K562/A02 MDR cells. Moreover, 7 h did not have any effect on cytochrome (CYP3A4) activity. These results indicate that 7 h is a relatively safe modulator of P‐gp‐mediated MDR that has good potential for further development.     

(2,2‐Diphenyl‐[1,3]oxathiolan‐5‐ylmethyl)‐(3‐phenyl‐propyl)‐amine: a Potent and Selective 5‐HT1A Receptor Agonist

A selective 5‐HT _1A receptor agonist : A new series of ligands acting at 5‐HT_1A serotonin receptor were identified. Among them (2,2‐diphenyl‐[1,3]oxathiolan‐5‐yl‐methyl)‐(3‐phenyl‐propyl)amine (shown) possesses outstanding activity (pK_i=8.72, pD₂=7.67, E_max=85) and selectivity (5‐HT_1A/α_1D>150), and represents a new 5‐HT_1A agonist chemotype.