Gustatory thalamus lesions in the rat: II. Aversive and appetitive taste conditioning.

The learning capacities of rats with electrolytic lesions of the gustatory thalamus (GT) were investigated in 3 experiments. In Experiment 1, the presence of a taste cue failed to overshadow odor aversion learning in the lesioned rats, yet these same animals acquired normal taste and odor aversions. Thalamic lesions had no discernible effect on the acquisition of a conditioned flavor preference in Experiment 2. Finally, GT lesions completely reversed the anticipatory contrast effect shown by control subjects in Experiment 3. These results suggest that damage to the GT spares taste detection and recognition and simple associative learning but interferes with learning that involves more complex gustatory information processing. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Odor and taste aversions conditioned in anesthetized rats.

Conditioned flavor aversions (CFA) are acquired by anesthetized rats but effects of various anesthetics on acquisition of aversions for separate odor and taste components are unknown. In Experiment 1, rats drank tomato juice and then were tranquilized with "Innovar-Vet" or "Rompun" before receiving injections of lithium chloride. Neither drug interfered with acquisition of aversions. Innovar-Vet alone produced no aversions; Rompun alone produced mild aversions but did not enhance aversions when combined with lithium. In Experiments 2 and 3, rats received a compound odor/taste cue as they drank and then were anesthetized with pentobarbital before lithium injections. Anesthesia alone produced negligible aversions but facilitated taste-lithium aversions. During odor tests, odor aversions were weaker than taste aversions. These data extend previous work and suggest that CFA does not result from ordinary classical conditioning. A tripartite notation that unites CFA and classical conditioning is discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Comparison of nutritive and nonnutritive stimuli in intestinal and oral conditioned taste aversion paradigms.

The intestinal taste aversion paradigm has previously demonstrated that animals could orally discriminate between carbohydrate and fat subsequent to pairing a gastrointestinal (GI) infusion of 1 nutrient with lithium chloride (LiCl), whereas they could not discriminate between 2 nonnutritive flavors (A. L. Tracy, R. J. Phillips, M. M. Chi, T. L. Powley, & T. L. Davidson, 2004). The present experiments assessed the relative salience of nutritive and nonnutritive stimuli when presented either intestinally or orally. Two compound stimuli, each comprising 1 nutrient and 1 nonnutritive flavor, were presented in training and were paired with LiCl or saline. Subsequent oral intake of the nutrients alone, the flavors alone, or the compounds was measured. Results showed that rats discriminated both nutrients and flavors independently after GI or oral training, whereas the compounds were discriminated only after oral training, indicating substantive differences in the processing of these stimuli. This suggests that nutrient activation of the GI tract may potentiate learning about nonnutritive flavors analogously to taste-potentiated odor conditioning. The ability to learn about the oral properties of stimuli in the GI tract suggests a new account of delayed taste aversion learning as well as learning about the positive nutritive consequences of food consumption. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Alcohol aversion generalization in rats: Specific disruption of taste and odor cues with gustatory neocortex or olfactory bulb ablations.

Rats with ablations of the gustatory neocortex (Experiment 1) and rats with olfactory bulb ablations (Experiment 2) were compared with normal rats for aversion generalization to both single taste solutions (sucrose, sodium chloride, quinine hydrochloride, hydrochloric acid) and compound taste solutions (pairs of the four single tastants) following alcohol aversion training. All rats acquired equal and strong alcohol aversions. Control rats showed consistent aversion generalization to both the sucrose plus quinine and the sucrose plus hydrochloric acid solutions; no significant generalization occurred to the single tastants except a weak generalization to sucrose in Experiment 2. Rats with gustatory neocortical ablations failed to show aversion generalization to any of the taste solutions. Rats with olfactory bulbectomies displayed the same aversion generalization functions as control rats but exhibited significantly faster extinction of the alcohol aversion than did the trained control rats. Results from the present experiments suggest that during alcohol aversion learning, rats lacking gustatory neocortex use odor cues (no taste generalization), whereas rats lacking olfactory bulbs utilize taste cues (normal taste generalization). (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Taste-potentiated odor aversion learning based on amphetamine

This study sought to determine whether a taste can potentiate a conditioned odor aversion based on amphetamine as well as those based on lithium. A taste-potentiated odor aversion (TPOA) based on lithium was obtained in Experiment 1 only with a low concentration of an almond odor. This concentration was used in Experiment 2 where the taste, 0.1% saccharin, potentiated an odor aversion based on 1 mg/kg d-amphetamine. This was replicated in Experiment 3 where potentiation was found with doses of both 1 and 3 mg/kg amphetamine, and no effect of dose was detected. It was concluded that TPOA learning is not restricted to drugs such as lithium that produce conditioned unpalatability as well as conditioned aversions to a taste, because amphetamine does not produce conditioned unpalatability at the doses used here. Furthermore, because in Experiment 3 postconditioning extinction of the saccharin aversion removed the potentiation effect, it appears that this form of TPOA may depend on an association between the odor and taste, as proposed by within-compound theory.     

Taste preconditioning augments odor-aversion learning.

On the basis of previous work that has shown a taste can potentiate odor-aversion conditioning in AX+ conditioning, 6 experiments used rats to examine the effects of pairing a preconditioned taste (A) with a novel odor cue (X) in an A+/AX+ aversion conditioning design. Experiments 1A and 1B demonstrated that a preconditioned taste produced a robust odor aversion that was significantly stronger than a potentiated odor aversion. The results of Experiment 2 showed that the robust odor aversion produced by A+/AX+ conditioning was not the result of the potentiated odor aversion summating with generalization from the taste aversion. The augmented odor aversion was produced only when the taste and odor stimuli were presented simultaneously (Experiment 3) and the preconditioned taste aversion was intact at compound conditioning (Experiment 4). Pairing a novel odor with a preconditioned taste was not sufficient to condition an aversion to odor (Experiment 5), although other results implicated a role for an association between odor and taste in the odor augmentation effect (Experiment 6). The present results have implications for current models of taste + odor interactions in flavor-aversion conditioning. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Effects of brain lesions on taste-potentiated odor aversion in rats.

Rats failed to acquire aversions to odor stimulus, which was followed 30 min later by an unconditioned stimulus (US). However, when the odor stimulus was accompanied by a taste stimulus, they acquired odor aversions as well as taste aversions. In this phenomenon, referred to as a taste-potentiated odor aversion, lesions of the amygdala disrupted both taste and odor aversions, whereas lesions of the parvicellular part of ventroposteromedial thalamic nucleus (VPMpc) or insular cortex (IC) disrupted taste aversion but attenuated only odor aversion. These results suggest that both taste and odor stimuli are associated with US in the amygdala and that taste inputs delivered to the amygdala through the IC and/or VPMpc play an important role in potentiation of odor aversion. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Role of temporal order and odor intensity in taste-potentiated odor aversions.

The role of the temporal order of odor and taste was studied in two experiments, and a third experiment studied the role of odor intensity in flavor-toxicosis conditioning with thirsty rats licking water spouts in a "wind tunnel." In all experiments, odors and tastes were presented for 2 min to rats, and 30 min later, a toxin (lithium chloride) was intubated. In Experiment 1, an odor was presented 90 s before, during, or 90 s after a taste to independent groups. Experiment 2 was a within-subjects partial replication of the first. Each rat was presented with one odor, then a taste, then a second odor with each stimulus separated by 45 s. The results of Experiments 1 and 2 indicated that (a) odor alone is not associated with illness under our conditions, (b) presenting an odor and a taste at the same time potentiates the odor component so that it is associated with illness, (c) 45-s and 90-s intervals between odor and taste eliminate potentiation, and (d) taste and odor interact asymmetrically; that is, odor has little effect on the development of taste-illness associations. In Experiment 3, an odor and a taste were presented simultaneously, and odor intensity varied. As odor intensity increased, the strength of the taste-potentiated odor aversion increased, whereas the aversion to the taste remained constant. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Carbohydrate-conditioned odor preferences in rats.

The effectiveness of odor cues to support nutrient-conditioned flavor preferences in rats was studied. When the rats drank fluid, the CS+ odor was paired with intragastric (IG) infusions of Polycose, and the CS– odor with IG water. In Experiment 1, rats trained with almond and anise odors presented with plain drinking water failed to acquire a CS+ odor preference. In contrast, rats in Experiment 2 formed a strong aversion to anise (or almond) paired with lithium chloride, which indicated that the odors were distinguishable to the rats. Experiment 3 showed that providing unique tastes (bitter or sour) in combination with the odors during training potentiated odor conditioning. The rats displayed a strong preference for the odor?+?taste CS+ and for the odor component alone. Experiment 4 showed that with another pair of odors (peppermint and vanilla), CS+ preferences could be conditioned in the absence of taste cues during training. These results demonstrate that rats can acquire strong nutrient-conditioned odor preferences. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Flavor-illness aversions: Gustatory neocortex ablations disrupt taste but not taste-potentiated odor cues.

Two studies evaluated the contribution of the gustatory neocortex (GN) to the potentiation of odor by taste during illness-induced aversions in 130 male Sprague-Dawley rats. In Exp I, Ss lacking GN and controls were given an odor, a taste, or an odor–taste compound cue followed by intragastric gavage of LiCl. Prior to conditioning, neophobia for flavored solutions was absent in Ss with GN lesions. After pairing with LiCl, GN Ss developed normal conditioned odor aversions, whereas conditioned taste aversions were attenuated or totally blocked. Potentiation of odor by taste after compound conditioning was evident in both control and GN Ss. In Exp II, normal Ss were given compound conditioning to induce potentiated odor aversions and then given GN lesions prior to tests with the odor and taste components. Taste aversion retention was totally disrupted by GN ablation; potentiated odor aversions were retained by both groups, although the GN group extinguished faster. (29 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Parabrachial nucleus lesions block taste and attenuate flavor preference and aversion conditioning in rats.

Rats with ibotenic acid lesions of the parabrachial nucleus (PBN) failed to learn a taste aversion induced by lithium chloride (LiCl) toxicosis. The same rats also did not learn to prefer a taste that was paired with intragastric (IG) carbohydrate infusions during 22 hr/day trials. The PBN-lesioned rats did learn to prefer a flavor (odor?+?taste) paired with the IG carbohydrate infusions over a different flavor paired with IG water. The PBN-lesioned rats also learned to avoid a flavor paired with IG LiCl infusions during 22 hr/day trials. The flavor preference and aversion, however, were less pronounced than those displayed by control rats. These data indicate that the PBN is essential for forming orosensory-viscerosensory associations when taste is the primary cue but is less critical when more complex flavor cues are available. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Absence of differential associative responses to novel and familiar taste stimuli in rats lacking gustatory neocortex.

24 Long-Evans hooded rats lacking gustatory neocortex and 24 normal rats were familiarized to either hydrochloric acid or quinine hydrochloride solutions during free-drinking trials. Ss were subsequently trained to avoid either the familiar or the novel taste stimulus, using a balanced design, by pairing the to-be-associated taste with ip injections of apomorphine hydrochloride. Balanced, nonpaired presentations of the other taste solution and water were also presented. Normal Ss learned to avoid the novel taste more efficiently than the familiar taste. Ss with gustatory neocortex lesions did not differentiate novel from familiar tastes. They learned aversions to both in a manner highly similar to the aversion learning of familiar tastes by the normal group. Therefore, results demonstrate that Ss lacking gustatory neocortex displayed an associative deficiency only when they were trained on novel stimuli. This suggests that gustatory neocortex lesions disrupt the conditionability of taste stimuli by reducing or eliminating responses to taste novelty. This interpretation is supported by the absence of a "neophobic" response in the lesioned rats to the first presentation of a taste stimulus. (26 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Flavor, not postingestive, cues contribute to the salience of proteins as targets in aversion conditioning.

Proteins have proven to be more salient targets for aversion conditioning than carbohydrates. The present studies examined the contribution of flavor and postingestive factors to the salience of proteins as targets in aversion conditioning in the rat. Two methods for separating flavor and postingestive cues were used, sham feeding and intragastric gavage. Both methods agreed in indicating that postingestive consequences of protein consumption were neither necessary nor sufficient for the development of more severe protein than carbohydrate aversions. Differences in palatability did not appear likely to be the basis of protein salience because when acceptability or palatability of the nutrient solutions was matched, aversions to protein continued to be more severe. Differences in odor intensity of nutrient solutions may be important because when an odorant was added to a carbohydrate solution, the severity of aversions to protein and carbohydrate were no longer different. These results indicate that the presence of both taste and odor cues in target nutrients may contribute importantly to their salience. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Conditioned taste and taste-potentiated odor aversions in the Syracuse high- and low-avoidance (SHA/Bru and SLA/Bru) strains of rats (Rattus norvegicus).

SHA/Bru and SLA/Bru rats were selectively bred for good and poor active-avoidance learning. However, SLA/Bru animals are superior to SHA/Bru rats in conditioned suppression and passive avoidance learning. In this experiment, saccharin taste and almond odor were the components of a compound CS (flavor) in an illness-induced aversive conditioning paradigm. SLA/Bru rats (n?=?17) showed stronger conditioned flavor, taste, and odor aversion than did SHA/Bru animals (n?=?18). Unselected Long-Evans rats (n?=?18) were intermediate between the selected strains. SLA/Bru and Long-Evans rats showed taste-potentiated odor aversion in this experiment, whereas SHA/Bru animals did not. The results provide evidence that genetic factors, as exemplified by the different strains, are importantly involved in the mechanisms underlying interoceptive and exteroceptive aversive conditioning. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Potentiation of odor by taste in rats: Tests of some nonassociative factors.

Three experiments with 94 male Sprague-Dawley rats tested the contribution of nonassociative neophobia and sensitization to the potentiation of odor by taste. In Exp I, neophobia for almond odor (O), saccharin taste (T), and odor-taste compound (OT) cues was tested before and after noncontingent LiCl poisoning and compared with conditioned aversions produced by OT–LiCl temporal pairing. The OT compound potentiated unconditioned neophobia, but there was no evidence of poison-enhanced neophobia, disinhibition of neophobia, or sensitization by noncontingent LiCl; temporal pairing produced aversions for the compound and its elements. In Exp II, generalization to a novel odor was tested after O–LiCl or compound OT–LiCl pairing. The potentiated odor aversion did not generalize to the novel odor; it was specific to the odor paired with taste and LiCl. In Exp III, potentiation of the odor component by a discriminant or nondiscriminant taste component was tested. Potentiation was evident only when a novel discriminant taste was in compound with odor prior to LiCl poisoning. Results from all experiments support an associative "indexing" hypothesis of the potentiation effect in rats. (14 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Discriminating the stimulus elements during human odor–taste learning: A successful analytic stance does not eliminate learning.

Odor “sweetness” may arise from experiencing odors and tastes together, resulting in a flavor memory that is later reaccessed by the odor. Forming a flavor memory may be impaired if the taste and odor elements are apparent during exposure, suggesting that configural processing may underpin learning. Using a new procedure, participants made actual flavor discriminations for one odor–taste pair (e.g., Taste A vs. Odor X–Taste A) and mock discriminations for another (e.g., Odor Y–Taste B vs. Odor Y–Taste B). Participants, who were successful at detecting the actual flavor discriminations, demonstrated equal amounts of learning for both odor–taste pairings. These results suggest that although a capacity to discriminate flavor into its elements may be necessary to support learning, whether participants experience a configural or elemental flavor representation may not. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2011 APA, all rights reserved)     

Representation-mediated overshadowing and potentiation of conditioned aversions.

Examined the ability of CS-evoked representations of flavored substances to modulate the conditioning of LiCl-based aversions to simultaneously presented flavors or odors. In Exps I–III, 156 thirsty Sprague-Dawley rats first received pairings of an auditory CS with a flavored-water UCS; they then received pairings of a compound stimulus with a toxin. Exp IV examined the potentiation of aversion conditioning to a novel odor using 32 Ss. In Exp I, conditioning of a flavor was partially overshadowed when it was presented in compound with a tone that had been previously paired with another flavor. Exp II replicated that result and also found that conditioning to a flavor was not overshadowed when the flavor was presented in compound with a tone that had been paired with that same flavored substance. In Exps III and IV, conditioning to an odor stimulus was potentiated when it was presented in compound with either a tone or another odor that had been previously paired with a flavor stimulus. Results suggest that evoked representations of stimuli may substitute for those events themselves in a variety of associative functions. (36 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist D-APV selectively disrupts taste-potentiated odor aversion learning.

Examined in 2 experiments the effects of the competitive N-methyl-{d}-aspartate (NMDA) antagonist {d}-APV ({d}-2-amino-5-phosphonovalerate) on rats' ability to acquire potentiated aversions to the odor element of a taste–odor compound. In Exp 1, pretreatment with {d}-APV (2.5 μg/side icv) caused stereospecific deficits in potentiated odor aversion learning but left simple taste and odor aversion learning intact. In Exp 2, pretreatment with {d}-APV had no effect on rats' acquisition of an illness-based odor discrimination task. These results parallel those previously obtained using a noncompetitive NMDA antagonist (G. S. Robinson et al, 1989) and show that interference with NMDA receptors can selectively impair potentiated odor aversion learning. These results suggest that NMDA receptors play a critical role in some, but not all, forms of learning and memory. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Stimulus preexposure reduces generalization of conditioned taste aversions between alcohol and non-alcohol flavors in infant rats.

Results of 3 experiments showed that infant rats (age 13-17 days) generalize conditioned taste aversions between alcohol and non-alcohol tastes such as a mixture of sucrose and quinine, apple cider vinegar, or coffee. Nonreinforced preexposure to those tastes reduced generalized aversions between them. Generalization between alcohol and sucrose-quinine was reduced not only after preexposure to both tastes, but also when only the nonconditioned taste was preexposed, whereas with alcohol and vinegar, both tastes had to be preexposed to obtain that effect. In no case was generalization reduced when only the to-be-conditioned taste was preexposed. Previous experience with alcohol alone, as well as with similar gustatory stimuli, may enhance subjects' ability to differentiate them during infantile stages in rats. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Taste agnosia following gustatory neocortex ablation: Dissociation from odor and generality across taste qualities.

In Exp I, 18 male Long-Evans hooded rats trained to avoid drinking in the presence of a compound odor (benzyl acetate) and taste (sucrose) CS lost the taste habit but retained the odor habit following gustatory neocortex (GN) ablation. Conversely, olfactory bulb ablation resulted in loss of the odor habit but retention of the taste habit. In Exp II, with 60 Ss, Ss lacking GN did not retain preoperatively instated learned aversions to a suprathreshold quinine hydrochloride (bitter) taste solution that had been employed as a CS. However, Ss with GN lesions that were virtually identical to those of the bitter-trained group retained a preoperatively learned aversion to a hydrochloric acid (sour) CS. Exp III, with 60 Ss, demonstrated that reliable agnosia for an acid CS could be produced by lesions that extended more deeply into perirhinal areas near the claustrum at the level of the GN. It is concluded that the agnosia following GN ablation is relatively specific to gustation and that agnosia for preoperatively acquired tasted aversion habits occurs for all 4 basic gustatory stimuli following anterolateral cortex ablations centered on the GN. (49 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)