Effects of the polybutadiene/poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) ratio in a polybutadiene‐g‐poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) impact modifier on the morphology and mechanical behavior of acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene blends

Polybutadiene‐g‐poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (PB‐g‐SAN) impact modifiers with different polybutadiene (PB)/poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (SAN) ratios ranging from 20.5/79.5 to 82.7/17.3 were synthesized by seeded emulsion polymerization. Acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene (ABS) blends with a constant rubber concentration of 15 wt % were prepared by the blending of these PB‐g‐SAN copolymers and SAN resin. The influence of the PB/SAN ratio in the PB‐g‐SAN impact modifier on the mechanical behavior and phase morphology of ABS blends was investigated. The mechanical tests showed that the impact strength and yield strength of the ABS blends had their maximum values as the PB/SAN ratio in the PB‐g‐SAN copolymer increased. A dynamic mechanical analysis of the ABS blends showed that the glass‐transition temperature of the rubbery phase shifted to a lower temperature, the maximum loss peak height of the rubbery phase increased and then decreased, and the storage modulus of the ABS blends increased with an increase in the PB/SAN ratio in the PB‐g‐SAN impact modifier. The morphological results of the ABS blends showed that the dispersion of rubber particle in the matrix and its internal structure were influenced by the PB/SAN ratio in the PB‐g‐SAN impact modifiers. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 98: 2165–2171, 2005     

Influence of the notch‐sharpening technique on styrene–acrylonitrile fracture behavior

The Centre Català del Plàstic and Universidad Rey Juan Carlos laboratories joined forces to investigate the effect of the notch‐sharpening technique on the fracture parameters of styrene–acrylonitrile. Contact notch‐sharpening techniques, such as razor tapping, razor sliding, and razor broaching, and a noncontact procedure, femtolaser, were analyzed. The fracture values of the samples with notches sharpened via contact techniques were divided into two groups: one with pop‐in and the other with no pop‐in in the load–displacement records; this resulted in the lowest and highest fracture toughnesses, respectively. The fracture parameters of the specimens with notches sharpened via a femtolaser were between those of the samples with notches sharpened via contact procedures in which pop‐in occurred and those in which it did not. To explain these results, the crack front of the nontested specimens after sharpening was investigated in depth, we identified the type of damage and measured its size and the crack tip radii. The morphology of the crack front was related to the fractographic study. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2016 , 133, 43775.     

Structural morphology and properties of star styrene–isoprene–butadiene rubber and natural rubber/star styrene–butadiene rubber blends

Star styrene–isoprene–butadiene rubber (SIBR) was synthesized with a new kind of star anionic initiator made from naphthalene lithium and an SnCl₄ coupled agent. The relationship between the structure and properties of star SIBR was studied. Star block styrene–isoprene–butadiene rubber (SB‐SIBR), having low hysteresis, high road‐hugging, and excellent mechanical properties, was closer to meeting the overall performance requirements of ideal tire‐tread rubber according to a comparison of the morphology and various properties of SB‐SIBR with those of star random SIBR and natural rubber/star styrene–butadiene rubber blends. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 93: 336–341, 2004     

Influence of acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene (ABS) morphology and poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (SAN) content on fracture behavior of ABS/SAN blends

This study attempted to correlate morphological changes and physical properties for a high rubber content acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene (ABS) and its diluted blends with a poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (SAN) copolymer. The results showed a close relationship between rubber content and fracture toughness for the blends. The change of morphology in ABS/SAN blends explains in part some deviations in fracture behavior observed in ductile–brittle transition temperature shifts. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 92: 2606–2611, 2004     

Evaluation of the fracture behaviors of multilayered propylene–ethylene copolymer/polypropylene homopolymer composites with the essential work of fracture

As one of the most appropriate techniques for evaluating the fracture behavior, the essential work of fracture (EWF) was introduced to investigate the fracture toughness of multilayered composites. Propylene–ethylene copolymer (CPP)/polypropylene homopolymer (HPP) alternating multilayered composites with 2–128 layers were prepared though multilayered coextrusion. Polarized optical microscopy photographs revealed that the CPP and HPP layers aligned alternately vertical to the interfaces and continuously parallel to the extrusion direction. The dichroic Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy results showed that the coextrusion sheet had a preferential orientation parallel to the melt flow direction (MD); this caused crack propagation along the blunted MD and the necking ligament section. After heat treatment, the orientation parallel to the MD could been largely eliminated, and the crack propagated in a stable manner. The specific essential work of fracture (w_e) of the multilayered composite was higher than that of the blend; this indicated a higher resistance of crack propagation. The number of layers had little effect on the toughness of the multilayered composites. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2014 , 131, 40574.     

Polyhydroxybutyrate/acrylonitrile‐g‐(ethylene‐co‐ propylene‐co‐diene)‐g‐styrene blends: Their morphology and thermal and mechanical behavior

Polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) is a biodegradable bacterial polyester emerging as a viable substitute for synthetic, semicrystalline, nonbiodegradable polymers. An elastomer terpolymer of acrylonitrile‐g‐(ethylene‐co‐propylene‐co‐diene)‐g‐styrene (AES) was blended with PHB in a batch mixer and in a twin‐screw extruder to improve the mechanical properties of PHB. The blends were characterized with differential scanning calorimetry, dynamic mechanical analysis, scanning electron microscopy, and impact resistance measurements. Despite the narrow processing window of PHB, blends with AES could be prepared via the melting of the mixture without significant degradation of PHB. The blends were immiscible and composed of four phases: poly(ethylene‐co‐propylene‐co‐diene), poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile), amorphous PHB, and crystalline PHB. The crystallization of PHB in the blends was influenced by the AES content in different ways, depending on the processing conditions. A blend containing 30 wt % AES presented impact resistance comparable to that of high‐impact polystyrene, and the value was about 190% higher than that of pure PHB. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Effect of blending sequence on the morphology and properties of polyamide 6/EPDM‐g‐MA/epoxy blends

The ternary blends of polyamide 6/maleated ethylene‐propylene‐diene rubber/epoxy (PA6/EPDM‐g‐MA/EP) were prepared by a twin‐screw extruder with four different blending sequences. With the variation of blending sequence, the ternary blends presented distinct morphology and mechanical properties because of different interactions induced by various reactive orders. The addition of epoxy could increase the viscosity of the PA6 matrix, but a considerably larger size of the dispersed rubber phase was observed while first preblending PA6 with epoxy followed by blending a premix of PA6/EP with EDPM‐g‐MA, which was attested by rheological behaviors and SEM observations. It was probably ascribed to the fact that the great increase of the interfacial tension between the matrix and rubber phase aroused a great coalescence of rubber particles. The presence of epoxy in the rubber phase reduced the rubber's ability to cavitate so that the toughening efficiency of the EPDM‐g‐MA was decreased. The results of mechanical testing revealed that the optimum blending sequence to achieve balanced mechanical properties is blending PA6, EPDM‐g‐MA, and epoxy simultaneously in which the detrimental reactions might be effectively suppressed. In addition, thermal properties were investigated by TG and DSC, and the results showed that there was no distinct difference. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011     

Effect of styrene–isoprene–styrene,styrene–butadiene–styrene,and styrene–butadiene–rubber on the mechanical,thermal, rheological,and morphological properties of polypropylene/polystyrene blends

The mechanical, thermal, rheological, and morphological properties of polypropylene (PP)/polystyrene (PS) blends compatibilized with styrene–isoprene–styrene (SIS), styrene–butadiene–styrene (SBS), and styrene–butadiene–rubber (SBR) were studied. The incompatible PP and PS phases were effectively dispersed by the addition of SIS, SBS, and SBR as compatibilizers. The PP/PS blends were mechanically evaluated in terms of the impact strength, ductility, and tensile yield stress to determine the influence of the compatibilizers on the performance properties of these materials. SIS‐ and SBS‐compatibilized blends showed significantly improved impact strength and ductility in comparison with SBR‐compatibilized blends over the entire range of compatibilizer concentrations. Differential scanning calorimetry indicated compatibility between the components upon the addition of SIS, SBS, and SBR by the appearance of shifts in the melt peak of PP toward the melting range of PS. The melt viscosity and storage modulus of the blends depended on the composition, type, and amount of compatibilizer. Scanning electron microscopy images confirmed the compatibility between the PP and PS components in the presence of SIS, SBS, and SBR by showing finer phase domains. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 88: 266–277, 2003     

Morphology and micromechanical deformation behavior of styrene–butadiene block copolymers. IV. Structure–property correlation in binary block copolymer blends

The structure–property correlation in blends consisting of styrene/butadiene block copolymers forming alternating polystyrene (PS) and polybutadiene (PB) lamellae, and PS domains in rubbery matrix was investigated by different microscopic techniques (transmission electron microscopy, scanning force microscopy, and scanning electron microscopy), uniaxial tensile testing, and dynamic mechanical analysis. Unlike the pure lamellar block copolymer, the blends showed predominantly disordered wormlike morphology formed by the intermolecular mixing. These structures allowed a precise control of stiffness/toughness ratio of the blends over a wide range. The blends showed a gradual transition from predominantly viscoplastic to elastomeric behavior with increasing triblock copolymer content. The results demonstrated that the binary block copolymer blends provide the unique possibility of tailoring mechanical properties on the basis of nanostructured polymeric materials. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 92: 1219–1230, 2004     

Mechanical properties of polystyrene/polyamide 6 blends compatibilized with the ionomer poly(styrene‐co‐sodium acrylate)

The compatibilizing effect of the ionomer, poly(styrene‐co‐sodium acrylate) (PSSAc), on immiscible blends of polystyrene (PS)/polyamide 6 (PA6) was studied by mechanical tests and scanning electron microscopy. The PSSAc acts as an effective compatibilizer because both the deformation at break (%) obtained by tensile stress–strain tests and the impact rupture energy are larger in blends containing small amounts of PSSAc. The morphologies of the fractured surfaces produced by tensile stress–strain tests of blends with or without the ionomer confirm that PSSAc increases the interfacial adhesion between PS and PA6 phases. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 92: 2545–2551, 2004     

New fracture characterization in polymer miniature specimens based on the essential work of fracture

The fracture characterization under plane‐stress conditions in polymer sheets in recent decades has usually been done through the application of the essential work of fracture (EWF) method. However, when deeply double‐edged, notched tensile standard specimens cannot be obtained, the use of alternative small pieces, such as prenotched miniature specimens, could be a viable solution. This is why we examined the new fracture characterization in polymer‐prenotched small punch test (SPT) specimens in this study. With the results that we obtained, the feasibility of using prenotched SPT specimens for evaluating the EWF parameters and their correspondence with the results from standard specimens were established. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2016 , 132, 42837.     

A study on the effects of SEBS‐g‐MAH on the phase morphology and mechanical properties of polypropylene/polycarbonate/SEBS ternary polymer blends

In this work, five ternary blends based on 70% by weight (wt %) of polypropylene (PP) with 30% wt of polycarbonate (PC)/poly(styrene‐b‐(ethylene‐co‐butylene)‐b‐styrene)(SEBS) dispersed phase consists of 15 wt % PC and 15 wt % reactive (maleic anhydride grafted) and nonreactive SEBS mixtures at various ratios were prepared in a co‐rotating twin screw extruder. scanning electron microscopy (SEM) micrographs showed that the blends containing only nonreactive SEBS exhibited a fine dispersion of core‐shell particles. With decreasing the SEBS/SEBS‐g‐Maleic Anhydride (MAH) weight ratio, the morphology changed from the core‐shell particles to a mixed of core‐shell, rod‐like and individual particles. This variation in phase morphology affected the thermal and mechanical properties of the blends. DSC results showed that the blends containing only nonreactive SEBS exhibited a minimum in degree of crystallinity due to the homogeneous nucleation of core‐shell particles. Mechanical testing showed that in the SEBS/SEBS‐g‐MAH weight ratio of 50/50, the modulus and impact strength increased compared with the PP matrix while the yield stress had minimum difference with that of PP matrix. These effects could be attributed to the formation of those especial microstructures revealed by the SEM studies. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011     

Cure characteristics,morphology, and mechanical properties of ethylene–propylene–diene–monomer rubber/acrylonitrile butadiene rubber blends

Blends based on ethylene–propylene–diene monomer rubber (EPDM) and acrylonitrile butadiene rubber (NBR) was prepared. Sulfur was used as the vulcanizing agent. The effects of blend ratio on the cure characteristics and mechanical properties, such as stress–strain behavior, tensile strength, elongation at break, hardness, rebound resilience, and abrasion resistance have been investigated. Tensile and tear strength showed synergism for the blend containing 30% of NBR, which has been explained in terms of morphology of the blends attested by scanning electron micrographs. A relatively cocontinuous morphology was observed for 70 : 30, EPDM/NBR blend system. The experimental results have been compared with the relevant theoretical models. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 2007     

Dynamic mechanical and morphological behavior of blends of polystyrene and poly[acrylonitrile‐g‐(ethylene‐co‐propylene‐co‐diene)‐g‐styrene] prepared by in situ polymerization of styrene

PS/AES blends were prepared by in situ polymerization of styrene in the presence of AES elastomer, a grafting copolymer of poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) – SAN and poly(ethylene‐co‐propylene‐co‐diene)–EPDM chains. These blends are immiscible and present complex phase behavior. Selective extraction of the blends' components showed that some fraction of the material is crosslinked and a grafting of PS onto AES is possible. The morphology of the noninjected blends consists of spherical PS domains covered by a thin layer of AES. After injection molding, the blends show morphology of disperse elastomeric phase morphology in a rigid matrix. Two factors could contribute to the change of morphology: (1) the stationary polymerization conditions did not allow the mixture to reach the equilibrium morphology; (2) the grafting degree between PS and AES was not high enough to ensure the morphological stability against changes during processing in the melting state. The drastic change of EPDM morphology from continuous to disperse phase has as consequence a decrease in the intensity of the loss modulus peaks corresponding to the EPDM glass transition. However, the storage modulus at temperatures between the glass transition of EPDM and PS/SAN phases does not change significantly. This effect was attributed to the presence of the SAN rigid chains in the AES. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 2009     

Carbon‐fiber‐reinforced acrylonitrile–styrene–acrylate composites: Mechanical and rheological properties and electrical resistivity

The aim of this study was to improve the mechanical properties of an acrylonitrile–styrene–acrylate copolymer (ASA) with the help of carbon fibers (CFs). Additionally, the effects of the CFs on the morphology, rheological properties, dynamical mechanical properties, electrical resistivity, and heat resistance of the ASA composites were studied with scanning electron microscopy, rotational rheometry, and dynamic thermomechanical analysis (DMA). The mechanical properties of the ASA composites were enhanced largely by the CFs. The maximum tensile strength of the ASA/CF composites reached 107.2 MPa. The flexural strength and flexural modulus also reached 162.7 MPa and 12.4 GPa, respectively. These findings were better than those of neat ASA; this was attributed to the excellent interfacial adhesion between the CFs and ASA resin. Rheological experiments proved that the viscosity and storage modulus (G′) values of the ASA/CF composites did not increase until the CF content reached 20%. The DMA outcomes confirmed that the glass‐transition temperature of the ASA composites was elevated from 120.6 to 125°C. Importantly, the G′ values of the composites with 20 and 30% CFs showed a large increase during heating. In addition, the ASA/CF composites exhibited excellent conductivity and heat resistance. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2016 , 133, 43252.     

Thermoplastic elastomeric blend of nitrile rubber and poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile). II. Replacement of nitrile rubber by its vulcanizate powder

A model waste nitrile rubber powder (w‐NBR) was prepared by ambient grinding of aged NBR vulcanizate based on an oil seal formulation. The w‐NBR was characterized by scanning electron microscopic and optical microscopic techniques. Virgin nitrile rubber in a thermoplastic elastomeric 70:30 nitrile rubber/poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (SAN) blend was replaced by w‐NBR, and the mechanical properties and swelling index were determined. The virgin NBR in the blend was replaced by the rubber present in w‐NBR (r‐w‐NBR) and the optimum mechanical properties were achieved at 45% replacement where the blend was still reprocessable. Transmission electron microscopic and atomic force microscopic studies reveal that w‐NBR particles coated with NBR are dispersed in a continuous SAN matrix. It was observed that migration of unreacted curatives from w‐NBR to virgin NBR is not significant and incorporation of curatives is necessary for attainment of optimum level of mechanical properties. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 90: 2348–2357, 2003     

Phase morphology and thermomechanical analysis of poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile)/ethylene–propylene–diene monomer blends: Uncompatibilized and reactively compatibilized blends with two mixing sequences

The phase morphology developing in immiscible poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (SAN)/ethylene–propylene–diene monomer (EPDM) blends was studied with an in situ reactively generated SAN‐g‐EPDM compatibilizer through the introduction of a suitably chosen polymer additive (maleic anhydride) and 2,5‐dimethyl‐2,5‐di‐(t‐butyl peroxy) hexane (Luperox) and dicumyl peroxide as initiators during melt blending. Special attention was paid to the experimental conditions required for changing the droplet morphology for the dispersed phase. Two different mixing sequences (simple and two‐step) were used. The product of two‐step blending was a major phase surrounded by rubber particles; these rubber particles contained the occluded matrix phase. Depending on the mixing sequence, this particular phase morphology could be forced or could occur spontaneously. The composition was stabilized by the formation of the SAN‐g‐EPDM copolymer between the elastomer and addition polymer, which was characterized with Fourier transform infrared. As for the two initiators, the blends with Luperox showed better mechanical properties. Scanning electron microscopy studies revealed good compatibility for the SAN/EPDM blends produced by two‐step blending with this initiator. Dynamic mechanical thermal analysis studies showed that the two‐step‐prepared blend with Luperox had the best compatibility. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011     

Impact of blend ratio on the properties of graphene oxide‐filled carboxylated acrylonitrile–butadiene rubber/styrene–butadiene rubber blends

Carboxylated acrylonitrile–butadiene rubber (XNBR) and styrene–butadiene rubber (SBR) composites with 3 phr (parts per hundred rubber) graphene oxide (GO) were prepared using a latex mixing method. Effects of XNBR/SBR blend ratios on the mechanical properties, thermal conductivity, solvent resistance and thermal stability of the XNBR/SBR/GO nanocomposites were studied. The tensile strength, tear strength, thermal conductivity and solvent resistance of the XNBR/SBR/GO (75/25/3) nanocomposite were significantly increased by 86, 96, 12 and 21%, respectively, compared to those of the XNBR/SBR (75/25) blend. The thermal stability of the nanocomposite was significantly enhanced; in other words, the temperature for 5% weight loss and the temperature of the maximal rate of degradation process were increased by 26.01 and 14.97 °C, respectively. Theoretical analysis and dynamic mechanical analysis showed that the GO tended to locate in the XNBR phase, which led to better properties of the XNBR/SBR/GO (75/25/3) nanocomposite. © 2017 Society of Chemical Industry     

Preparation and characterizations of RTV epoxy blends using amide maleic anhydride‐g‐liquid polybutadience as both reactive toughening and curing components

Amide maleic anhydride‐g‐liquid polybutadience (AMALPB) was synthesized using maleic anhydride‐g‐liquid polybutadience (MALPB) with ethylenediamine (EDA), and its structure was confirmed by FTIR and ¹H‐nuclear magnetic resonance spectra, respectively. It was then used as a reactive toughening agent to make blends with diglycidyl end‐capped poly(bisphenol‐A‐co‐epichlorohydrin epoxy cured at room temperature. Their thermal decomposing behaviors did not show much difference because both EDA and AMALPB possessed similar aliphatic groups. All their glass transition temperatures (T_g) increased more than 10 °C than that of the neat epoxy, and with the addition of AMALPB, the blends were greatly strengthened upon heating as show from their storage moduli. When AMALPB was added at 10 wt %, its elongation at break increases to a maximum of 8.8% which was about two times higher than that of the neat epoxy, and its tensile strength also increased. However, the excessive addition of AMALPB resulted in an apparent decline in their tensile strength at content above 20%. The simultaneous improvements in both tensile strength and strain were attributed to the existence of well‐dispersed rubber particles in the continuous matrices performing plastic deformation that resulted from the chemical bonds of interfaces among the rubber particles and matrix, and meanwhile, inducing the deflection of the cracks. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2018 , 135, 45985.     

Morphology and mechanical properties of styrene–ethylene/butylene–styrene triblock copolymer/high‐density polyethylene composites

The morphology and mechanical properties of a styrene–ethylene/butylene–styrene triblock copolymer (SEBS) incorporated with high‐density polyethylene (HDPE) particles were investigated. The impact strength and tensile strength of the SEBS matrix obviously increased after the incorporation of the HDPE particles. The microstructure of the SEBS/HDPE blends was observed with scanning electron microscopy and polar optical microscopy, which illustrated that the SEBS/HDPE blends were phase‐separation systems. Dynamic mechanical thermal analysis was also employed to characterize the interaction between SEBS and HDPE. The relationship between the morphology and mechanical properties of the SEBS/HDPE blends was discussed, and the toughening mechanism of rigid organic particles was employed to explain the improvement in the mechanical properties of the SEBS/HDPE blends. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008