Community studies of the health service implications of low back pain

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study using primary care physician case notes and a self-report questionnaire on the same randomly selected population sample. OBJECTIVES: To assess the prevalence, management, and outcomes of low back pain in the community, comparing, in the same random sample of registered patients, self-report questionnaire data and primary care physicians' records. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The financial and resource implications of low back pain are extensive. Data on consultations, investigations, and the management of low back pain are fragmentary and there are no comparisons estimating prevalence from case notes and self-report. METHODS: A retrospective study of prevalence, management, referral, and outcome covering the previous 12 months was carried out in three general practices using case notes and a self-report postal questionnaire on a sample of 900 patients over 18 years. RESULTS: Lifetime prevalence of low back pain was 62%. Annual prevalence was 48%, with 16% reporting low back pain at the time of report. Twenty-four percent consulted their primary care physician for low back pain, of whom 17% were referred to a hospital specialist. The annual consultation rate of patients with low back pain was similar to the rate for patients with chronic conditions. The activities of daily living were restricted in less than half, with few taking sick leave. The general health status of those reporting recent low back pain was significantly lower than those not reporting low back pain. Most felt that low back pain was self-limiting and would not consult health professionals for future episodes. There were substantial discrepancies between case notes recorded at consultation with the primary care physician and self-report regarding consultation and investigations. CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence rates were comparable with those reported in other studies. The significant discrepancies between data sources suggest patient recall bias or underrecording in case notes. The low consultation rate, time off, and day-to-day disability indicate that most episodes are self-limiting.     

Late morbidity after esophagectomy for cancer: is partial esophagectomy preferred?

BACKGROUND: Several studies have highlighted the problem of back pain among helicopter pilots, but few have controlled for potential confounding factors in their analyses, or sought to examine the effects of back pain on operational readiness and flying performance. There have been no previous studies of the prevalence of back pain among Australian military pilots. METHODS: The prevalence, risk factors, and consequences of low back pain were assessed in a cross-sectional survey of 200 Australian military helicopter pilots by self-completion questionnaire. RESULTS: Responses were received from 131 (66%) of available pilots. The overall prevalence of reported back pain was 64% (95% CI 56%-72%), with a further 28% of pilots describing back discomfort while flying. More than half the pilots (55%) indicated that back pain had interfered with their concentration while flying, with 16% reporting that they had hurried flying missions because of pain. A minority of pilots (7%) had refused to fly because of back problems. After adjusting for age, education, BMI, posture and numbers of hours flown, multiple logistic regression modelling indicated that a prior history of back injury was the most significant predictor of back pain among rotary wing pilots (OR 2.63, 95% CI 1.11-6.23). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the prevalence of back pain in Australian military helicopter pilots is unacceptably high and may be limiting operational readiness, pilot performance, flying safety, and pilot health. Urgent attention needs to be given to improved ergonomic design in aircraft, and both back pain prevention and back injury rehabilitation programs.     

Effect of blood viscosity on the function of isolated perfused porcine kidney after cold preservation

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study with two age cohorts. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether women receiving hormone replacement therapy after menopause have a higher prevalence of back problems than women who do not receive such treatment. BACKGROUND: Back pain is a common medical problem throughout life and especially during pregnancy. Hormonal factors have been proposed as a possible contributor. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A validated postal questionnaire was sent in early 1995 to all 1324 women of 55 years and 56 years of age residing in Link?ping, Sweden. This questionnaire included questions about current hormone replacement treatment, previous and current back problems, medical care for back problems, parity, exercise and smoking habits, and occupation. RESULTS: The questionnaire was returned by 84.7% of the women. There was a significant, albeit weak, positive association between current use of hormone replacement treatment and low back pain. Previous back problems during pregnancy was a strong risk factor for current back pain, whereas neither current smoking nor regular physical exercise was a risk factor according to multiple logistic regression analysis. The interaction of smoking and an occupation involving heavy lifting significantly affected back pain. CONCLUSIONS: Women receiving hormone replacement treatment had a slightly, but significantly, higher prevalence of current back pain than nonusers (48% vs. 42%, respectively, P < 0.05), which could not be explained by differences in occupation, smoking habits, or current physical activity. Although the association between hormone replacement therapy and back problems is weak and probably of minor clinical importance, it is speculated that hormonal effects on joints and ligaments may be involved.     

Socioeconomic incidences and prognostic factors of low back pain caused by occupational injuries among the hospital personnel of Grenoble University Hospital Center

Low back pain is generally believed to be common among hospital employees. This cross-sectional, retrospective study was carried out to determine the annual incidence of low back pain ascribable to occupational injuries in hospital employees and to evaluate factors influencing the prognosis of these injuries. In 1989, 70 employees working at the Grenoble Teaching Hospital (GTH) reported an occupational injury responsible for low back pain. Each of these employees filled out an epidemiological questionnaire during a routine evaluation by a rheumatologist. Overall annual incidence of occupational injuries with subsequent low back pain was 1.9% among GTH employees. Higher incidences were seen among employees whose occupations involved patient transfer, as well as among nursing assistants. Activities associated with an increased risk of low back pain included handling of patients or objects and work requiring prolonged periods in uncomfortable positions or in the standing position. A previous history of low back disease and a longer period of time in the current work were also associated with an increased risk of low back pain. Characteristic clinical profiles of patients with low back pain subsequent to occupational injury were determined by occupation and type of hospital department. The analysis of long-duration absence from work and long-term consequences on career confirmed the significant adverse socioeconomic impact of these injuries.     

Drugs on a medical campus. III. Drug use among nursing and paramedical personnel

Fifty nurses and 50 paramedical staff working in the Rajendra Hospital and Medical College, Patiala, were studied by means of a structured, self-report questionnaire. The life-time prevalence of drug use among nurses was comparatively low--55%, compared to 81% among the paramedical staff. Current use of drugs as shown by the 30-day prevalence rate was also very low among the nurses, a majority of whom restricted themselves to using tranquillizers and sedatives for the specific purpose of relaxation or inducing sleep; only a few had experimented with alcohol, cannabis, and tobacco. On the other hand, the most commonly used drug among the paramedical personnel was alcohol, followed by sedatives, tranquillizers, cannabis and tobacco, most of them taking the drug for social reasons or for the thrills from the effects of the drug. This is also reflected in the comparatively higher number of paramedicals who felt that they would probably continue to use these drugs in the future, as also the fact that there were a few dependent users of opium and narcotics in this group.     

Is work status of low back pain patients best described by an automated device or by a questionnaire?

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective cohort study of patients with subacute occupational back pain. OBJECTIVES: To study the relation between a marketed opto-electric device measuring trunk kinematics, a widely used specific functional capacity questionnaire, and work status in back pain patients, and to assess the responsiveness to change in work status of the opto-electric device and the questionnaire. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Several instruments have been developed to evaluate the functional capacities of patients with back pain, but the relation between these instruments and work status has rarely been studied. METHODS: The relation between the opto-electric device, the questionnaire, and work status in patients with back pain was evaluated. The study population was a prospective cohort of patients with subacute back pain who were absent from regular work for more than 4 weeks. All data were compiled blindly on the same day, at study entry (4 weeks after work accident), and at 12, 24, and 52 weeks after the work accident. The validity of the questionnaire and opto-electric device scores was assessed with partial correlation analyses, standardized response mean, logistic regression analyses, and receiver operating characteristics curves. RESULTS: The correlation between the questionnaire and opto-electric device scores was low. The questionnaire scores were significantly related to work status, but the opto-electric device scores were not. The questionnaire was responsive to change in work status, whereas the opto-electric device was not. CONCLUSIONS: The opto-electric device scores were not related to either functional capacity scores (questionnaire) or work status in patients with low back pain, and the opto-electric device was not responsive to change in work status. Conversely, the questionnaire was related to work status and was responsive to change in work status.     

Natural history of low back pain. A longitudinal study in nurses

STUDY DESIGN: Longitudinal study. OBJECTIVES: To assess the natural history of low back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Most episodes of low back pain resolve or improve within a few weeks, but chronic or recurrent symptoms are common. Previous studies of natural history have usually relied on people's long-term recall of symptoms, or they have been limited to patients seeking clinical care. METHODS: Nurses (1,165 women) completed a baseline questionnaire and up to eight follow-up questionnaires 3 months apart. Each questionnaire asked whether they had experienced low back pain in the past month. One-month prevalences of pain at specified follow-ups were calculated according to histories of pain reported on earlier questionnaires. RESULTS: The 1-month prevalence of low back pain at individual follow-ups ranged from 16% to 19%. Of 906 women who completed the baseline questionnaire and at least three follow-up questionnaires, 38 (4.2%) reported pain every time they returned a questionnaire, and 190 (21.0%) reported pain on at least three occasions. The presence or absence of low back pain at baseline was highly predictive of future pain throughout follow-up. The longer that back pain was consistently reported, the more likely it was to be present at the next follow-up. Later risk was lowest in women who reported no back pain at baseline or either of the first two follow-ups. Back pain carried a worse prognosis if it was disabling or associated with sciatica. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm the importance of back pain duration and the occurrence of associated disability and sciatica as predictors of future symptoms, and allow more reliable quantification of the natural history of back pain in women of working age. In the absence of other information, the differentials in risk associated with a person's history of back pain appear to remain constant for a period of at least 2 years.     

Two siblings with adult-onset sialidosis type I (cherry-red spot-myoclonus syndrome)

A questionnaire was sent to 967 schoolchildren, in two age groups, in northern Finland in order to investigate the prevalence of chronic knee pain. A response rate of 88.5% was achieved. Adolescents (aged 14-15 years) had significantly more knee pain (p < 0.0001) than children (aged 9-10 years). The total prevalence of chronic knee pain at the time of the evaluation was 18.5% among adolescents and 3.9% among children. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of chronic knee pain between boys and girls in these age groups. Overweight was not a predisposing factor in chronic knee pain.     

The Saskatchewan health and back pain survey. The prevalence of low back pain and related disability in Saskatchewan adults

STUDY DESIGN: Population-based, cross-sectional, mailed survey. OBJECTIVES: To determine the lifetime, 6-month period, and point prevalence of low back pain and its related disability among Saskatchewan adults and to investigate the presence and strength of selective response bias. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There have been many reports of the prevalence of low back pain in different populations, and the estimates vary widely depending on case definition. However, most studies fail to differentiate between trivial and disabling back pain, which raises the issue of the usefulness of these estimates. No studies have yet documented the prevalence of graded low back pain severity and its related disability in a North American, general, population-based survey. METHODS: The Saskatchewan Health and Back Pain Survey was mailed to a probability sample of 2184 Saskatchewan adults between 20 and 69 years of age. Fifty-five percent of the eligible population responded to the survey. Respondents were compared with nonrespondents, and the presence of selective response bias by back pain status was investigated by wave analysis. The point and lifetime prevalence of low back pain was determined by simple questions, and the 6-month period prevalence of low back pain was determined by the Chronic Pain Questionnaire. All estimates were age standardized to the Saskatchewan population. RESULTS: The authors estimate that at the time of the survey 28.4% (95% confidence interval, 25.6-31.1) of the Saskatchewan adult population were experiencing low back pain, and 84.1% (95% confidence interval, 81.9-86.3) had experienced it during their lifetime. Overall, 48.9% (95% confidence interval, 45.9-52.0) of the population had experienced low intensity/low-disability low back pain in the previous 6 months, 12.3% (95% confidence interval, 10.3-14.4) had experienced high-intensity/low-disability low back pain, and an additional 10.7% (95% confidence interval, 8.8-12.5) had experienced high-disability low back pain in the previous 6 months. There was little variation in the estimates over age groups, but women experienced more high-disability back pain than men. There was no evidence of selective response bias by low back pain status in the survey. CONCLUSION: Low-intensity/low-disability low back pain is a common problem in the general population. Approximately 11% of the adult population studied had been disabled by low back pain in the previous 6 months.     

Low back pain and its relationship to back strength and physical activity in children

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to determine the occurrence of low back pain and its relationship to back strength and physical activity in children. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The study included 53 boys and 43 girls aged 10 to 19 years from a group of 116 children who had undergone isometric strength testing 4 years previously. No intervention was performed. Each child was asked five questions concerning low back pain. A questionnaire to quantify participation in athletic activities and manual labor was used as the basis for calculation of each child's activity level. Isometric back flexor and extensor strength were measured with the same method used 4 years previously. Statistical analyses were performed with appropriate correction for confounding factors. RESULTS: The frequency of low back pain and the relationship between low back pain and age, between low back pain and back strength, and between low back pain and physical activity were determined. There was a history of low back pain in 51%, and the frequency of low back pain in the past year was 35%. Eight percent of the children had been limited by low back pain, and 7% had seen a doctor for the pain. The first incident of low back pain occurred at a mean age of 12.3 years. The frequencies of a history of low back pain and of low back pain in the past year increased significantly with age (p = 0.02 and 0.01 respectively). Increased physical activity was significantly associated with a history of low back pain (p = 0.03), and increased back flexor strength was significantly associated with a history of low back pain and of low back pain in the past year (p = 0.03 and 0.008, respectively). The rate of low back flexor or strength over 4 years had a significantly positive association with the occurrence of low back pain in the past year (p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Low back pain is common in children, and, in contrast to adults, low back pain in these children was more common with increased physical activity and stronger back flexors. We believe the main causes of low back pain in children are musculotendinous strains and ligamentous sprains.     

Successful hormonal treatment of pulmonary parenchymal endometriosis

OBJECTIVE: Tobacco use and other behavioral factors are associated with chronic back pain. Anecdotes suggest excess caffeine use may also be associated with chronic back pain. We compared caffeine consumption by chronic back pain patients with caffeine consumption by controls. DESIGN: Retrospective case-control study. SETTING: A multispecialty outpatient facility. PATIENTS: Sixty new, consecutive patients with chronic back pain compared to 60 new, consecutive patients without chronic back pain. INTERVENTION: Patients were prospectively asked to complete an intake questionnaire. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Daily caffeine consumption was estimated by analyzing the intake questionnaire. Differences between groups were analyzed by both normal and nonparametric statistics. RESULTS: Consumption of caffeine by patients with chronic back pain averaged 392.4 mg/day. Controls consumed 149.8 mg/ day, a significant difference (p = .0001). Men consumed 86% more caffeine per day than women (p = .02). Age and caffeine consumption showed little correlation (r = .126). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with chronic back pain consume over twice as much caffeine as patients without chronic back pain. Confounding variables and possible mechanisms associating caffeine with chronic back pain are discussed.     

Meteorological conditions and self-report of low back pain

STUDY DESIGN: Six months of daily low back pain ratings for 94 individuals were tested for the influence of prevailing weather conditions during the spring, summer, and fall seasons. Intergroup differences were tested for study participants who reported weather sensitivity and for those who did not. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the relation between pain ratings and prevailing weather conditions in a population with chronic or recurrent low back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Weather conditions have been reported to influence pain perception in some disease states, including low back pain. Investigations of this relation in chronic or recurrent low back pain have involved varied methodologies, and conflicting results have been reported. METHODS: The effects of eight weather variables reported to influence musculoskeletal pain were tested on daily pain ratings. A post hoc weather sensitivity questionnaire was used to disperse 73 individuals into groups based on perceived weather sensitivity, and group differences were tested. RESULTS: Significant effects on pain scores were found, most notably for temperature and vapor pressure. The magnitude of the effects were small compared with autocorrelation of an individual's own pain scores. Significant differences were found between the group of individuals who were insensitive to weather conditions and that of individuals with perceived sensitivity to cold temperatures. No significant intergroup differences were found for damp, rainy conditions or changes in barometric pressure. CONCLUSIONS: Weather conditions may influence subjective reporting of low back pain significantly. Although the effects are small in magnitude, they should be considered in clinical treatment of the patient with chronic, nonspecific low back pain. Pain scores may demonstrate greater interaction with certain weather conditions in individuals perceiving sensitivity to those conditions.     

Muscle strength, task performance and low back load in nurses

Poor muscle strength, relative to the physical demands of specific jobs, is considered a risk factor for low back pain. To gain an understanding of the underlying mechanisms, this study questioned whether muscle strength was related to task performance and low back load in nursing tasks. Trunk extension, elbow flexion and knee extension strength were therefore measured in 17 nurses. The independent effects of muscle strength on task duration, jerkiness of effort and L5-S1 torque were investigated as the nurses performed several patient handling tasks. Despite a large variation in muscle strength within the subject population, no effect of strength on task duration, jerkiness or L5-S1 torques was observed. In conclusion, poor muscle strength was found not to be related to increased low back load. If 'weaker' nurses were to be at a higher risk, it would be due to a reduced capability to withstand the mechanical load, rather than to an increased mechanical load.     

Back pain and agricultural work among farmers: an analysis of the Colorado Farm Family Health and Hazard Surveillance Survey

BACKGROUND: Back pain is the most prevalent occupational health problem experienced by much of the world's workforce. However, agricultural work-related back pain occurring among US farmers working on small operations or family farms is usually not included in surveillance. With data collected by Colorado Farm Family Health and Hazard Surveillance Survey, this study reports characteristics of and risk factors for back pain among adult farmers living in eight Colorado counties. METHODS: A stratified probability sample of 500 farms was selected in proportion to the number of farms in study areas. During the 4-year period from 1993 through 1996, 458 farms were enrolled in the study and 759 farmers were interviewed using a questionnaire. Information on self-reported back pain and potential risk factors among 742 white farmers was evaluated and reported here. RESULTS: A total of 194 farmers (26.2%) reported to have had at least one episode of back pain lasting for 1 week or more. Males had a slightly higher prevalence of back pain than females (28.6% vs. 22.5%) and the lower back was the predominantly affected part of body among both males and females. In 45.4% of males and 43.9% of females back pain was brought on by repeated activities. Males' activities at work were more likely to cause back pain while females' activities at home were more likely to cause back pain. Three factors were found to be significantly associated with back pain: being depressed (odds ratio (OR) = 3.68, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.23-6.09), farming/ranching as main activities (OR = 1.66, CI = 1.17-2.36), and worked in agriculture for 10 to 29 years (OR = 1.62, CI = 1.14-2.30). CONCLUSIONS: Our analyses indicate that back pain is an occupational health problem among farmers on small operations or family farms and that back pain affected males and females differently. The finding of significant positive associations between depression, farming activities, and back pain warrants further attention.     

Disruptive behavior of elderly residents and the use of nursing methods

This study is the first part of a larger research project concerned with disruptive behaviour and the use of physical restraints on elderly nursing home residents. This paper is focused on the types and prevalence of disruptive behaviour among elderly residents, nurses' experiences and the types of nursing interventions employed. Data was collected from nurses of varying qualifications (n = 173) in seven Swiss nursing homes by using a questionnaire. The most frequent behavioural problems reported by nurses were mobility, incontinence, getting dressed, verbal communication, passivity, withdrawal and continual requests. Nurses found physical aggression, continual shouting and verbal abuse the most difficult to manage with. The results also indicated that experiences varied between nurses. In particular, nursing staff always considered disruptive behaviour more disruptive against other residents rather then against themselves. The most frequently used interventions against disruptive behaviour were considering residents' wants and needs, getting close, adjustment to residents' background and organisation of activities. Physical and chemical restraints were also used.     

Work-related low-back problems in nursing

This scientific literature review focuses on the relation between nursing work and low-back problems. Its aim was to estimate the risk of physical, psychosocial, and work organizational exposure factors that may lead to low-back problems. In addition this paper reviews and evaluates reported ergonomic intervention, with the object of decreasing the prevalence and incidence of low-back problems among nurses. A considerable number of studies of nursing staff has shown the connection between lifts and transfers of patients on one hand and low-back problems on the other. Factors in nursing work that may be significant in this connection are staff density and work satisfaction. In this review the single individual factor that was indisputably related to low-back problems was "history of back problems". Prevention programs do not show unequivocally positive results. There is a great need to carry out prospective studies with preventive programs.     

Pain pattern in pregnancy and "catching" of the leg in pregnant women with posterior pelvic pain

STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional study of symptoms and signs in pregnant women. OBJECTIVES: To describe the clinical appearance of back pain in pregnancy and the relation between pain distribution and symptoms in women with posterior pelvic pain, in order to shed light on etiologic factors. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Back pain is common in the general population. During pregnancy, it is even more common, and back pain is experienced by about 50% of pregnant women. In the pregnant woman, differentiation between common low back pain and posterior pelvic pain is believed to be essential because these symptoms should be treated in different ways. METHODS: The women were interviewed with a questionnaire. Those with back symptoms completed a pain drawing and were examined by an orthopedic surgeon. Based on the symptoms and findings, the women were divided into three groups: thoracic pain, lumbar pain, and posterior pelvic pain. RESULTS: Of 335 pregnant women, 51% had back pain at the time of examination. The pain was more widespread compared with common low back pain. Seventy-one percent of the 171 patients examined by the orthopedic surgeon had a positive posterior pelvic pain test. These women more often had pain in the gluteal and posterior thigh regions. A "catching" feeling of the leg was described when walking by 44 of 122 these women, whereas only 1 of 49 women without a posterior pelvic pain test had such symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The higher prevalence of back pain in pregnancy may be due to several factors. In women with posterior pelvic pain, there is a specific symptom-a catching of the leg when walking. The most probable explanation for the catching is that local nociception disturbs muscular function in women with posterior pelvic pain because changes in the sacroiliac joint range of motion, which is very small, cannot cause this symptom.     

Assessment of spinal musculature using surface electromyographic spectral color mapping

STUDY DESIGN: A technique is described for analyzing electromyogram data from lumbar spinal muscles, with special reference to discrimination of people with back pain. The ability to discriminate was evaluated in 99 people (61 healthy and 38 with chronic or acute back pain), and the influence of load was assessed. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate methods of analysis of complex electromyogram data and to assess correlation of electromyogram information with clinical condition in people with and without back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND INFORMATION: In previous analyses of electromyogram data, only a small part of the data have been used. Spinal muscular decompensation has been postulated in chronic low back pain, but there has been no direct demonstration of this phenomenon. Objective measures are still elusive. METHODS: Lumbar spinal surface electromyograms were recorded during an isometric lifting task. The data were represented graphically as color-coded plots of electromyogram frequency, time, and electromyogram amplitude. Spectral width at half-peak amplitude (spectral half width) was calculated from the digitized, summed data. Ninety-nine people were tested: 48 men (29 with no recent [in the past 2 years] history of back pain, 16 with chronic back pain, 3 with acute back pain) and 51 women (32 with no recent back pain and 19 with chronic back pain). RESULTS: Spectral color maps in people with chronic back pain were markedly different from those in healthy people. Spectral half width was greater in people with chronic back pain than in healthy people (P < 0.01). Blinded analysis of spectral color maps allowed discrimination of people with back pain from healthy people with a sensitivity of 76% and a specificity of 81%. People with a history of back pain had markedly variable half widths. CONCLUSIONS: A new method of analysis of electromyogram data from lumbar spinal muscles has allowed discrimination between people with back pain and healthy people. This provides direct evidence of a correlation between muscular electrical function, measured by electromyogram, and low back pain. This technique may have potential as an objective measurement tool.     

Effects of clozapine and haloperidol on baseline levels of vacuous jaw movements in aged rats

BACKGROUND: IgE-mediated hypersensitivity to latex proteins has become a significant clinical problem over the last decade. Nursing and medical staff are at risk because of their occupational exposure to latex. AIMS: To determine the prevalence of type I hypersensitivity to latex allergens in the nursing staff of an Australian hospital. METHODS: A questionnaire which asked about symptoms associated with the use of latex gloves was completed by 140 nurses working in the Alfred Hospital (72 in general medical wards, 68 in intensive care units). Skin prick tests with eluates of five different types of latex glove as well as common aeroallergens (rye pollen and house dust mite) and banana extract were performed. RESULTS: Thirty-one nurses (22%) were skin prick test positive to at least one of the five latex glove eluates. All of these nurses were atopic, having positive skin prick tests to rye pollen or house dust mite. Symptoms of local dryness, itch and erythema associated with glove use were reported by more than half the study group, but not more frequently by those who were skin prick test positive to latex. Urticaria associated with glove use was reported more frequently by those with positive latex skin prick tests (13% vs 4%, p = 0.05). Eighty-seven per cent of the nurses who were latex skin test positive were also positive to banana extract. CONCLUSIONS: IgE-mediated hypersensitivity to latex is common in nurses working in an Australian hospital. Glove associated symptoms were frequently reported, but in most cases the symptoms were more typical of irritant or contact dermatitis rather than type I hypersensitivity reactions. However, the extent of subclinical sensitisation to latex found in this study suggests that symptomatic latex allergy is likely to emerge as an increasing problem for nursing staff in this country.     

Community survey of factors associated with consultation for low back pain

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the psychosocial factors associated with consultation for low back pain. DESIGN: Two phase cross sectional postal survey. SETTING: Bradford Metropolitan Health District. SUBJECTS: 1813 adults responding to the phase 1 questionnaire. 540 of the 782 with an episode of low back pain in the past 12 months completed the second questionnaire. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Six psychosocial constructs. RESULTS: 406 (52%) of the respondents reporting back pain in the past 12 months had not consulted a health professional. Logistic regression showed that consultation was associated with externalised beliefs regarding pain management (odds ratio 3.6; 95% confidence interval 2.1 to 6.0). Duration of pain affected the factors associated with consultation. Consultation for episodes lasting less than two weeks (n=290) was associated with greater than median pain (3.0; 1.7 to 5.5), consultation for episodes over two weeks (n=243) was associated with increased disability (3.7; 1.5 to 9.0), and consultation for episodes over three months (n=143) with increased depression (3.9; 1.3 to 11.8). CONCLUSIONS: The results support a role for psychosocial factors in consultation for low back pain and suggest that the reasons for consultation vary with duration of pain. Duration of the episode may be a useful guide to management of non-specific low back pain.