Simultaneous measurement of pulmonary venous flow by intravascular catheter Doppler velocimetry and transesophageal Doppler echocardiography: relation to left atrial pressure and left atrial and left ventricular function

OBJECTIVES: The aim of our study was to compare measurements of pulmonary venous flow velocity obtained either by transesophageal Doppler echocardiography or by intravascular catheter Doppler velocimetry. Furthermore, the relation among pulmonary venous flow velocity, left atrial compliance and left atrial pressure was evaluated. BACKGROUND: Data about the relation between left atrial pressure and pulmonary venous flow velocity are controversial. METHODS: A total of 32 patients undergoing elective open heart surgery for coronary artery bypass grafting were included prospectively in the study. Pulmonary venous flow velocity (Doppler catheter) and left atrial pressure (microtip pressure transducer) were recorded simultaneously with recordings of pulmonary venous flow velocity obtained by transesophageal Doppler echocardiography. RESULTS: Agreement between Doppler catheter and Doppler echocardiographic measurements of pulmonary venous flow velocity (n = 18 patients) was analyzed using the Bland-Altmann technique. The 95% limits of agreement were -0.16 to +0.11 m/s for systolic peak velocity, -0.14 to +0.09 m/s for diastolic peak velocity and -0.12 to +0.10 m/s for atrial peak velocity. The closest agreement between both methods was found for the ratio of systolic to diastolic peak velocity, the ratio of systolic to diastolic flow duration and the time from Q deflection on the electrocardiogram to maximal flow velocity. Mean left atrial pressure was strongly correlated with the ratio of systolic to diastolic peak velocity (r = -0.829), systolic velocity-time integral (r = -0.653), time to maximal flow velocity (r = 0.844) and the ratio of systolic to diastolic flow duration (r = -0.556). The ratio of systolic to diastolic peak velocity and the time to maximal flow velocity were identified as strong independent predictors of mean left atrial pressure. Left atrial compliance was not found to be an independent predictor of mean left atrial pressure. CONCLUSIONS: Flow velocity in the left upper pulmonary vein can be reliably recorded by transesophageal pulsed wave Doppler echocardiography. Our data reveal further evidence that mean left atrial pressure can be estimated by the pattern of pulmonary venous flow velocity.     

Correspondence of left ventricular ejection fraction determinations from two-dimensional echocardiography, radionuclide angiography and contrast cineangiography

OBJECTIVES: This study assessed the agreement of left ventricular ejection fraction determinations from two-dimensional echocardiography, radionuclide angiography and contrast cineangiography. BACKGROUND: Previously published reports suggest that two-dimensional echocardiography, radionuclide angiography and contrast cineangiography are equally acceptable methods of assessing left ventricular ejection fraction on the basis of high coefficients of correlation. However, correlation of methods does not necessarily imply agreement. METHODS: In a prospective analysis, 25 consecutive subjects all had two-dimensional echocardiography and radionuclide angiography performed within 10 days of each other in the cardiology department of metropolitan community hospital. A retrospective computer search (Medline) revealed seven studies, using the coefficient of correlation (r), comparing two-dimensional echocardiographic left ventricular ejection fraction (n = 268) with radionuclide angiographic (n = 174) or contrast cineangiographic (n = 119) left ventricular ejection fractions. RESULTS: The eight individual studies (n = 293) comparing two-dimensional echocardiography with either radionuclide angiography or contrast cineangiography exhibited coefficients of correlation ranging from 0.78 to 0.93. Agreement analysis using the method of Bland and Altman was performed by averaging the results obtained from the two techniques and determining how disparate any single ejection fraction was (with 95% confidence limits) from the mean value. Agreement ranged from 23% to 42% around the mean ejection fraction. The average lack of agreement between the two methods for all studies involved was 17%, with an average r value of 0.86. CONCLUSIONS: Left ventricular ejection fraction determinations by means of two-dimensional echocardiography, radionuclide angiography and contrast cineangiography exhibit high correlation and only moderate agreement. High correlation does not always imply high agreement. These results suggest that, when validated by agreement analysis, multiple studies may not be necessary in appropriate clinical situations, potentially reducing costs.     

Estimation of left ventricular end-diastolic pressure with the difference in pulmonary venous and mitral A durations is limited when mitral E and A waves are overlapped

Previous studies showed that difference in pulmonary venous and mitral A-wave durations can be used for the estimation of left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, which is based on the assumption that the pulmonary venous A wave and mitral A wave start with the beginning of left atrial contraction. It is also assumed that the mitral A wave ends with the end of left atrial contraction. These assumptions may not be correct if left atrial contraction occurs before the early left ventricular filling is completed. Adequate Doppler mitral inflow and pulmonary venous flow signals were obtained simultaneously with left ventricular pressures at the cardiac catheterization laboratory in 50 patients who showed separated E and A waves in mitral inflow. After heart rate was increased by right atrial pacing to make the mitral E and A waves overlap, Doppler and hemodynamic measurements were repeated. When E and A waves are separated, pulmonary A-wave duration exceeding mitral A-wave duration has a sensitivity of 67% and specificity of 85% in the prediction of elevated left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (>/=20 mm Hg), whereas the pulmonary A wave ending later than mitral A wave has a sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 45%. When the mitral E and A waves are overlapped, the pulmonary A wave ending later than mitral A wave is better for the prediction of elevated left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (sensitivity 55%, specificity 75%) than pulmonary A-wave duration exceeding mitral A-wave duration (sensitivity 9%, specificity 96%). However, overall, both methods are limited for clinical use.     

Duration of pulmonary venous atrial reversal flow velocity and mitral inflow a wave: new measure of severity of cardiac amyloidosis

Transmitral Doppler flow patterns of patients with cardiac amyloidosis evolve from an early impaired relaxation to an advanced restrictive pattern. This reflects increasing severity of diastolic dysfunction and hence left ventricular filling pressures. The duration of the pulmonary venous atrial reversal flow was recently shown to exceed that of the mitral inflow A wave in patients with left ventricular end-diastolic pressure greater than 15 mm Hg. The objective of this study was to assess the utility of this index as a measure of the severity of cardiac amyloidosis. Comprehensive transthoracic 2-dimensional and pulsed-wave Doppler echocardiograms of the pulmonary venous and transmitral flows were made of 23 patients (10 women) with biopsy-proven diagnosis of primary systemic amyloidosis and of 49 subjects as age-matched normal controls. The amyloidosis group was divided into non-restrictive and restrictive subgroups on the basis of the patients' transmitral inflow deceleration time (>150 and < or =150 ms, respectively). The durations of the pulmonary venous atrial reversal and mitral inflow A wave were measured, and the differences between the flow durations were compared with the control and published data in the nonrestrictive and restrictive groups. The mean duration of the pulmonary venous atrial reversal was significantly longer in the amyloid than the control group (P < .01). The mean duration of the mitral inflow A wave was significantly shorter in the restrictive group than both the nonrestrictive and the control groups (P < .05). The duration of the pulmonary venous atrial reversal exceeded that of the mitral inflow A wave in all patients with cardiac amyloidosis. The difference in duration between pulmonary venous atrial reversal and mitral inflow A wave was significantly greater in the amyloidosis group compared with the normal group, and this index varied significantly within the amyloid group between the abnormal relaxation and the restrictive groups. The difference in the duration between the pulmonary venous atrial reversal and the mitral inflow A wave is a reliable index of diastolic function and can be used to assess the severity of cardiac amyloidosis.