Synthesis of liquid crystalline–amorphous block copolymers by combination of CFRP and ATRP mechanisms

Block copolymers of liquid crystalline 6‐(4‐cyanobiphenyl‐4′‐oxy) hexyl acrylate (LC6) and styrene (St) were obtained by the combination of two different free‐radical polymerization mechanisms namely conventional free‐radical polymerization (CFRP) and atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP). In the first part, thermosensitive azo alkyl halide, difunctional initiator (AI), was prepared and then used for CFRP of LC6 monomer. The obtained bromine‐ended difunctional liquid crystalline polymers (PLC6) were used as initiators in ATRP of St, in bulk in conjunction with CuBr/N,N,N′,N″,N″‐pentamethyldiethylenetriamine (PMDETA) as catalyst. In the second part, AI was firstly polymerized by CFRP in the presence of St and then the obtained difunctional bromine ended polystyrenes (PSt) were used as initiators in ATRP of LC6 in diphenyl ether solvent in conjuction with CuBr/PMDETA. The spectral, thermal, and optical measurements confirmed a fully controlled living polymerization, which results in formation of ABA‐type block copolymers with very narrow polydispersities. In both cases, blocks of the different chemical composition were segregated in the solid and melt phases. The mesophase transition temperatures of the liquid crystalline block were found to be very similar to those of the corresponding homopolymers. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2006     

Atom transfer radical polymerization of acrylonitrile

Iron(II) chloride coordinated by succinic acid was first used as the catalyst in 2‐chloropropionitrile‐initiated atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) of acrylonitrile. N,N‐dimethylformamide was used as a solvent to improve the solubility of the ligand. An iron(II) chloride to succinic acid ratio of 0.5 not only gives the best control of molecular weight and its distribution but also provides rather rapid reaction rate. Effects of solvent on polymerization of acrylonitrile were also investigated. The induction period is shorter in N,N‐dimethylformamide than in propylene carbonate and toluene and the rate of the polymerization in N,N‐dimethylformamide is fastest. The molecular weight of polyacrylonitrile agrees reasonably well with the theoretical molecular weight of N,N‐dimethylformamide. The rate of polymerization increases and the induction period becomes shorter with increasing polymerization temperature, and the apparent activation energy was calculated to be 56.5 kJ mol^?1. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 99: 1050–1054, 2006     

Synthesis and characterization of poly(vinyl chloride‐co‐vinyl acetate)‐graft‐poly[(meth)acrylates] by atom transfer radical polymerization

The graft polymerization of methyl methacrylate and butyl acrylate onto poly(vinyl chloride‐co‐vinyl acetate) with atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) was successfully carried out with copper(I) thiocyanate/N,N,N′,N′,N″‐pentamethyldiethylenetriamine and copper(I) chloride/2,2′‐bipyridine as catalysts in the solvent N,N‐dimethylformamide. For methyl methacrylate, a kinetic plot of ln([M]₀/[M]) (where [M]₀ is the initial monomer concentration and [M] is the monomer concentration) versus time for the graft polymerization was almost linear, and the molecular weight of the graft copolymer increased with increasing conversion, this being typical for ATRP. The formation of the graft polymer was confirmed with gel permeation chromatography, ¹H‐NMR, and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. The glass‐transition temperature of the copolymer increased with the concentration of methyl methacrylate. The graft copolymer was hydrolyzed, and its swelling capacity was measured. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 96: 183–189, 2005     

Urotropine as a highly effective and versatile promoter for atom transfer radical polymerization

Atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) is a transition metal complex‐catalyzed controlled/‘living’ radical process. Recently, there has been a lot of interest focused on decreasing the catalyst loading and reducing the cost of post‐polymerization purification for ATRP. In this work, urotropine was found to significantly enhance the ATRP of methyl acrylate (MA), methyl methacrylate (MMA) and styrene (St) catalyzed by CuBr/N,N,N′,N′,N″‐pentamethyldiethylenetriamine (PMDETA) and CuBr/tris(2‐(dimethylamino)ethylamine) (Me₆TREN). With the addition of 25 times the amount of urotropine relative to CuBr, well‐controlled polymerizations of MA, MMA and St were obtained at catalyst‐to‐initiator ratios of 0.01, 0.05 and 0.05, respectively, producing the corresponding polymers with molecular weights close to theoretical values and low polydispersities. The catalyst concentration could even be reduced to ppm level at a catalyst‐to‐initiator ratio as low as 0.001 in the polymerization of MA. These results indicate that urotropine is a very effective and versatile promoter for both CuBr/PMDETA and CuBr/Me₆TREN. In the presence of urotropine, the catalyst loading could be reduced by as much as 1000 times. As PMDETA is one of the cheapest ATRP ligands, the combination of urotropine with CuBr/PMDETA could substantially reduce the catalyst loading and the cost of post‐polymerization purification at the industrial scale and thus is promising for potential industrial applications. © 2014 Society of Chemical Industry     

Photo‐mediated metal free atom transfer radical polymerization of acrylamide in water

Photo‐mediated metal free atom transfer radical polymerization of acrylamide was conducted at 25 °C in water under visible light irradiation with water soluble 2‐hydroxy‐3‐(4‐benzoylphenoxy)‐N,N,N‐trimethyl‐1‐propaminium chloride (HBTPC) as photoredox catalyst and 2‐hydroxyethyl 2‐bromoisobutyrate as alkyl halide. The polymerization followed first‐order reaction kinetics. The living character of photo‐mediated atom transfer radical polymerization of acrylamide was verified by the linear development of the polymer number average molar mass (M_n,GPC) with monomer conversion and narrow molecular weight distributions (?). The effects of acrylamide concentration, light intensity, amount of HBTPC, and tris(2‐dimethylaminoethyl)amine on polymerization were investigated. Increasing monomer concentration led to a higher M_n,GPC values with narrow ?. The polymerization rate increased with increasing the amount of monomer, light intensity, HBTPC and tris(2‐dimethylaminoethyl)amine. The polymerization was monitored by the periodic light on/off. The structure of polyacrylamide was analyzed by proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectrometer and gel permeation chromatography. Successful chain extension experiments show the controlled nature of the polymerization. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2018 , 135, 46567.     

Reverse atom transfer radical polymerization of acrylonitrile

FeCl₃ coordinated by succinic acid was used as the catalyst for the first time in azobisisobutyronitrile‐initiated reverse atom transfer radical polymerization of acrylonitrile (AN). N,N‐dimethylformamide (DMF) was used as a solvent to improve the solubility of the ligand. A FeCl₃ to succinic acid ratio of 0.5 not only gives the best control of molecular weight and its distribution but also provides rather rapid reaction rate. Effects of different solvents on polymerization of AN were also investigated. The rate of the polymerization in DMF is faster than that in propylene carbonate and toluene. The molecular weight of polyacrylonitrile agrees reasonably well with the theoretical molecular weight in DMF. The rate of polymerization increases with increasing the polymerization temperature, and the apparent activation energy was calculated to be 64.8 kJ mol^?1. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 99: 32–36, 2006     

High‐molecular‐weight polyacrylonitrile by atom transfer radical polymerization

A single‐pot atom transfer radical polymerization was used for the first time to successfully synthesize polyacrylonitrile with a molecular weight higher than 80,000 and a narrow polydispersity as low as 1.18. This was achieved with CuBr/isophthalic acid as the catalyst, 2‐bromopropionitrile as the initiator, and N,N‐dimethylformamide as the solvent. The effects of the solvent on the polymerization of acrylonitrile were also investigated. The induction period was shorter in N,N‐dimethylformamide than in propylene carbonate and toluene, and the rate of the polymerization in N,N‐dimethylformamide was fastest. The molecular weight of polyacrylonitrile agreed reasonably well with the theoretical molecular weight in N,N‐dimethylformamide. When chlorine was used in either the initiator or the catalyst, the rate of polymerization showed a trend of decreasing, and the molecular weight deviated from the theoretical predication significantly. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 100: 3372–3376, 2006     

Reverse atom‐transfer radical polymerization of acrylonitrile catalyzed by FeCl3/iminodiacetic acid

FeCl₃ coordinated by iminodiacetic acid (IMA) was Changed used for the first time as the catalyst in azobisisobutyronitrile‐initiated reverse atom‐transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) of acrylonitrile (AN). An FeCl₃ to IMA ratio of 1:2 not only gave the best control of molecular weight and its distribution but also provided a rather rapid reaction rate. The effects of solvents on the polymerization of AN were also investigated. The rate of the polymerization in N,N‐dimethylformamide (DMF) was faster than in propylene carbonate or toluene. The molecular weight of polyacrylonitrile agreed reasonably well with the theoretical molecular weight in DMF. The rate of polymerization increased with increasing polymerization temperature and the apparent activation energy was calculated to be 54.8 kJ mol⁻¹. The reverse ATRP of AN did not show obvious living characteristics with CuCl₂ instead of FeCl₃. Copyright © 2005 Society of Chemical Industry     

Reverse atom transfer radical polymerization of n‐butyl methacrylate in an aqueous dispersed system

Reverse atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) of n‐butyl methacrylate (BMA) was conducted in an aqueous dispersed system. The influence of the surfactant, catalyst, reaction time and temperature on the colloidal stability and the control of polymerization was investigated. As a result, using an azo initiator (AIBN), a non‐ionic surfactant (Brij 35) and a hydrophobic ligand (dNbpy) to complex a copper halide, polymers with predetermined molecular weight and low polydispersity were obtained as stable latexes. Copyright © 2004 Society of Chemical Industry     

Primary amine functionalized polystyrenes by atom transfer radical polymerization

Primary amine functionalized polystyrenes were prepared in quantitative yields by atom transfer radical polymerization using the adduct of 1‐(bromoethyl)benzene with 1‐(4‐aminophenyl)‐1‐phenylethylene as initiator for styrene polymerization in the presence of a copper(I) bromide/N,N,N′,N′,N″‐pentamethyldiethylenetriamine catalyst system. The polymerizations proceeded via a controlled free radical polymerization process to afford quantitative yields of the corresponding primary amine functionalized polystyrenes with predictable molecular weights (M_n = 2 × 10³ to 10 × 10³ g mol^?1), relatively narrow molecular weight distributions (M_w/M_n = 1.03–1.49), well defined chain‐end functionalities and initiator efficiencies as high as 0.92. The polymerization process was monitored by gas chromatographic analysis. The primary amine functionalized polymers were characterized by thin layer chromatography, size exclusion chromatography, potentiometry and spectroscopy. Experimental results are consistent with quantitative functionalization via the 1,1‐diphenylethylene derivative. Polymerization kinetic measurements show that the polymerization reaction follows first order rate kinetics with respect to monomer consumption and the number average molecular weight increases linearly with monomer conversion. © 2003 Society of Chemical Industry     

Reverse atom transfer radical polymerization of methyl methacrylate in different solvents

The reverse atom transfer radical polymerization of methyl methacrylate was investigated in different solvents: xylene, N,N‐dimethylformamide, and pyridine. The polymerizations were uncontrolled, using 2,2′‐bipyridine as a ligand in xylene and pyridine because the catalyst (CuBr₂/2,2′‐bipyridine complex) had poor solubility in the xylene system. In the pyridine system, the solubility of the catalyst increased, but the solvent could complex with CuBr₂, which influenced the control of the polymerization. In the N,N‐dimethylformamide system, the catalyst could be dissolved in the solvent completely, but the ? N(CH₃)₂ group in N,N‐dimethylformamide could also complex with CuBr₂, so the polymerization could not be well controlled. The ligand of 4,4′‐di(5‐nonyl)‐2,2′‐bipyridine was also investigated in xylene; the introduction of the ? CH(C₄H₉)₂ group enabled the CuBr₂/4,4′‐di(5‐nonyl)‐2,2′‐bipyridine complex to easily dissolve in xylene, and the polymerizations were well controlled. The number‐average molecular weight increased linearly with the monomer conversion from 4280 to 14,700. During the whole polymerization, the polydispersities were quite low (1.07–1.10). © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2007     

Copper‐based reverse ATRP process for the controlled radical polymerization of methyl methacrylate

A series of copper‐based reverse atom transfer radical polymerizations (ATRP) were carried out for methyl methacrylate (MMA) at same conditions (in xylene, at 80°C) using N,N,N′,N′‐teramethylethylendiamine (TMEDA), N,N,N′,N′,N′‐pentamethyldiethylentriamine (PMDETA), 2‐2′‐bipyridine, and 4,4′‐Di(5‐nonyl)‐2,2′‐bipyridine as ligand, respectively. 2,2′‐azobis(isobutyronitrile) (AIBN) was used as initiator. In CuBr₂/bpy system, the polymerization is uncontrolled, because of the poor solubility of CuBr₂/bpy complex in organic phase. But in other three systems, the polymerizations represent controlled. Especially in CuBr₂/dNbpy system, the number‐average molecular weight increases linearly with monomer conversion from 4280 up to 14,700. During the whole polymerization, the polydispersities are quite low (in the range 1.07–1.10). The different results obtained from the four systems are due to the differences of ligands. From the point of molecular structure of ligands, it is very important to analyze deeply the two relations between (1) ligand and complex and (2) complex and polymerization. The different results obtained were discussed based on the steric effect and valence bond theory. The results can help us deep to understand the mechanism of ATRP. The presence of the bromine atoms as end groups of the poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) obtained was determined by ¹H‐NMR spectroscopy. PMMA obtained could be used as macroinitiator to process chain‐extension reaction or block copolymerization reaction via a conventional ATRP process. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 2007     

Atom transfer radical polymerization of styrene initiated by bromoacetylated syndiotactic polystyrene macroinitiator

Atom transfer radical polymerization of styrene was conducted with bromoacetylated syndiotactic polystyrene as macroinitiator and copper bromide combined with N,N,N′,N′,N′‐pentamethyldiethylenetriamine as catalyst. A two‐stage process has been developed to synthesize the macroinitiator. First, syndiotactic polystyrene (sPS) was functionalized in the side phenyl rings with acetyl groups using the Friedel–Crafts reaction; second, the acetyl groups were converted to bromoacetyl groups by an acid‐catalyzed halogenation reaction. The initiator was found to be active in the polymerization of styrene, leading to the production of graft chains with well‐defined structure. The molecular weight and molecular weight distribution of the graft chains were determined using gel permeation chromatography after cleaving from the sPS backbone using peroxide acid oxidation followed by hydrazine‐catalyzed hydrolysis. The results indicated that the polymerization process was characteristic of a ‘living’ nature. Copyright © 2007 Society of Chemical Industry     

Synthesis and characterization of amphiphilic block copolymers of methyl methacrylate with poly(ethylene oxide) macroinitiators formed by atom transfer radical polymerization

Amphiphilic ABA triblock copolymers of poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) with methyl methacrylate (MMA) were prepared by atom transfer radical polymerization in bulk and in various solvents with a difunctional PEO macroinitiator and a Cu(I)X/N,N,N′,N″,N″‐pentamethyldiethylenetriamine catalyst system at 85°C where X=Cl or Br. The polymerization proceeded via controlled/living process, and the molecular weights of the obtained block copolymers increased linearly with monomer conversion. In the process, the polydispersity decreased and finally reached a value of less than 1.3. The polymerization followed first‐order kinetics with respect to monomer concentration, and increases in the ethylene oxide repeating units or chain length in the macroinitiator decreased the rate of polymerization. The rate of polymerization of MMA with the PEO chloro macroinitiator and CuCl proceeded at approximately half the rate of bromo analogs. A faster rate of polymerization and controlled molecular weights with lower polydispersities were observed in bulk polymerization compared with polar and nonpolar solvent systems. In the bulk polymerization, the number‐average molecular weight by gel permeation chromatography (M_n,GPC) values were very close to the theoretical line, whereas lower than the theoretical line were observed in solution polymerizations. The macroinitiator and their block copolymers were characterized by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, ¹H‐NMR, matrix‐assisted laser desorption ionization time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry, thermogravimetry (TG)/differential thermal analysis (DTA), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). TG/DTA studies of the homo and block copolymers showed two‐step and multistep decomposition patterns. The DSC thermograms exhibited two glass‐transition temperatures at ?17.7 and 92°C for the PEO and poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) blocks, respectively, which indicated that microphase separation between the PEO and PMMA domains. SEM studies indicated a fine dispersion of PEO in the PMMA matrix. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 97: 989–1000, 2005     

Atom transfer radical polymerizations of methyl methacrylate and styrene with an iniferter reagent as the initiator

Three novel iniferter reagents were synthesized and used as initiators for the polymerizations of methyl methacrylate (MMA) and styrene (St) in the presence of copper(I) bromide and N,N,N′,N″,N″‐pentamethyldiethylenetriamine at 90 and 115°C, respectively. All the polymerizations were well controlled, with a linear increase in the number‐average molecular weights during increased monomer conversions and relatively narrow molecular weight distributions (weight‐average molecular weight/number‐average molecular weight ≤ 1.36) throughout the polymerization processes. The polymerization rate of MMA was faster in bulk than that in solution and was influenced by the different polarities of the solvents. A slight change in the chemical structures of the initiators had no obvious effect on the polymerization rates of MMA and St. The initiator efficiency toward MMA was lower than that toward St. The results of ¹H‐NMR, matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization time‐of‐flight mass spectrum analysis, and chain‐extension experiments demonstrated that well‐defined poly(methyl methacrylate) and polystyrene bearing photolabile groups could be obtained via atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) with three iniferter reagents as initiators. The polymerization mechanism for this novel initiation system was a common ATRP process. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 2007     

Copper(I) bromide coordinated by the ionic liquid 1‐[(diethyl amine)amine]ethyl‐3‐methyl imidazolium chloride to catalyze the atom transfer radical polymerization of methyl methacrylate in 1‐allyl‐3‐methyl imidazolium chloride

A coordinating ionic liquid (IL), 1‐[(diethyl amine)amine]ethyl‐3‐methyl imidazolium chloride ([N₃MIM]Cl), was prepared as an alternative to a simple organic ligand to coordinate to copper(I) bromide (CuBr). We, thereby, obtained a novel catalyst for atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) reactions. This catalyst was applied to the ATRP of methyl methacrylate in the IL 1‐allyl‐3‐methyl imidazolium chloride ([AMIM]Cl). The chemical structures of the ILs obtained were confirmed by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, mass spectrometry, and ¹H‐NMR analyses. The coordination ability of [N₃MIM]Cl was assessed by cyclic voltammetry, and the redox potential of [N₃MIM]Cl–CuBr was ?0.507 V. The [N₃MIM]Cl–CuBr complex was expected to be a markedly more active catalyst than the amine DETA–CuBr complex. The coordination mode toward CuBr was also examined. The [N₃MIM]Cl–CuBr catalyst system showed good controllability in the aforementioned ATRP reaction in [AMIM]Cl. The Cu catalyst was easily separated from the obtained polymer with the coordinating IL as a ligand. Consequently, the coordinating IL overcame the shortcomings of traditional organic ligands, such as poor compatibility with IL media and poor separation of the catalyst from the polymer; this makes it highly promising for applications in the ATRP field. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2017 , 134 , 45484.     

Facile atom transfer radical homo and block copolymerization of higher alkyl methacrylates at ambient temperature using CuCl/PMDETA/quaternaryammonium halide catalyst system

Controlled polymerization of higher alkyl methacrylates, e.g. lauryl methacrylate (LMA) and stearyl methacrylate (SMA) has been successfully achieved by atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) at ambient temperature using CuCl/N,N,N′,N′,N″-pentamethyldiethylenetriamine (PMDETA)/tricaprylylmethylammonium chloride (Aliquat^®336) as the catalyst system and ethyl 2-bromoisobutyrate or 2,2,2-trichloroethanol as the initiator. Although the bulk polymerization gives satisfactory control, the latter becomes better when anisole or THF is added into the system. Without AQCl the control was lost. A large deviation of molecular weight from theory has been observed which has been attributed to the very high-molecular weight of the dead polymers formed during the building-up of the persistent radical. The controlled polymers have been used as macroinitiators for block (di, tri and penta) ATR copolymerization with several methacrylates.     

Effects of the solvent polarity on the atom transfer radical polymerization of methyl methacrylate initiated by 4‐(chloromethyl)phenyltrimethoxysilane

The controllability of the atom transfer radical polymerization of methyl methacrylate in the polar solvent N,N‐dimethylformamide and the nonpolar solvent xylene with 4‐(chloromethyl)phenyltrimethoxysilane as an initiator and with CuCl/2,2′‐bipyridine and CuCl/4,4′‐di(5‐nonyl)‐2,2′‐bipyridine as catalyst systems was studied. Gel permeation chromatography analysis established that in the nonpolar solvent xylene, much better control of the molecular weight and polydispersity of poly(methyl methacrylate) was achieved with the CuCl/4,4′‐di(5‐nonyl)‐2,2′‐bipyridine catalyst system than with the CuCl/2,2′‐bipyridine as catalyst system. In the polar solvent N,N‐dimethylformamide, unlike in xylene, the polymerization was more controllable with the CuCl/2,2′‐bipyridine catalyst system than with the CuCl/4,4′‐di(5‐nonyl)‐2,2′‐bipyridine catalyst system. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 104: 2751–2754, 2007     

Atom transfer radical polymerization of n‐butyl methacrylate in an aqueous dispersed system

Atom transfer radical polymerization of n‐butyl methacrylate (BMA) was conducted in an aqueous dispersed system with different kinds of copper complexes. The partitioning behavior of the copper complexes, including CuCl/4,4′‐di(5‐nonyl)‐2,2′‐bipydine (dNbpy), CuCl₂/dNbpy, CuCl/2,2′‐bipydine (bpy), CuCl₂/bpy, CuCl/bis(N,N′‐dimethylaminoethyl)ether (bde), and CuCl₂/bde between the monomer (BMA), and water was studied in detail with ultraviolet‐visible spectroscopy. The results show that with a less hydrophobic ligand, such as bpy or bde, most of the Cu(I) or the Cu(II) complexes migrated from the BMA phase to the aqueous phase, the atom transfer equilibrium was destroyed, and the polymerization was nearly not controlled; it converted to classical emulsion polymerization. As to the very hydrophobic ligand dNbpy, although the partitioning study of the copper complexes indicated that not all the copper species were restricted to the organic phase, the linear correlation between the molecular weight and the monomer conversion and the narrow polydispersities confirmed that the polymerization was still quite well controlled. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 89: 3175–3179, 2003     

Atom transfer radical polymerization of lauryl methacrylate

The atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) of lauryl methacrylate (LMA) with an ethyl 2‐bromobutyrate/CuCl/N,N,N′,N″,N″‐pentamethyldiethylenetriamine initiation system was successfully carried out in toluene, and poly(lauryl methacrylate) with a low polydispersity (1.2 < weight‐average molecular weight/number‐average molecular weight < 1.5) was obtained. Plots of ln ([M])₀/([M]) versus time and plots of the molecular weight versus conversion showed a linear dependence, indicating a constant number of propagating species throughout the polymerization. The rate of polymerization was 0.56‐order with respect to the concentration of the initiator and 1.30‐order with respect to the concentration of the Cu(I) catalyst. In addition, the effect of the solvent on the polymerization was investigated, and the thermodynamic data and activation parameters for the solution ATRP of LMA were reported. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 90: 1117–1125, 2003