Paclitaxel by 96-hour continuous infusion in combination with cisplatin: a phase I trial in patients with advanced lung cancer

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of paclitaxel administered by 96-hour continuous infusion in combination with cisplatin, to determine if the addition of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) permits significant paclitaxel dose escalation, and to assess the toxicity and preliminary activity of this combination in patients with advanced lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty patients with untreated lung cancer were enrolled: 42 had advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and eight had extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Patients received paclitaxel doses of 100 to 180 mg/m2/96 hours and cisplatin doses of 60 to 80 mg/m2 as a single 30-minute bolus injection at the end of the paclitaxel infusion. RESULTS: Two of six patients experienced dose-limiting neutropenia at a dose of paclitaxel 140 mg/m2/96 hours and cisplatin 80 mg/m2. With G-CSF support, one of three patients experienced both dose-limiting mucositis and fatal neutropenic sepsis at a dose of paclitaxel 180 mg/m2/96 hours and cisplatin 80 mg/m2. Significant peripheral neuropathy developed in five patients and occurred after six or more cycles of therapy. Thirty-three of 42 patients with NSCLC had measurable disease; the objective response rate was 55%, with two complete responses and 16 partial responses. For all 42 patients with NSCLC, the median time to progression and median survival duration were 5 months and 10 months, respectively. The actuarial 1-year survival rate was 41%. Of eight SCLC patients, four responded to therapy, and the median survival duration for all SCLC patients was 11 months. CONCLUSION: The MTD without G-CSF is paclitaxel 120 mg/m2/96 hours and cisplatin 80 mg/m2, and the MTD with G-CSF is paclitaxel 160 mg/m2/96 hours and cisplatin 80 mg/m2. Infusional paclitaxel with cisplatin is well tolerated and active in patients with advanced NSCLC.     

Continuous infusion etoposide/carboplatin for treatment of refractory acute leukemia

Etoposide (125 mg/m2/d) and carboplatin (200 mg/m2/d) were administered by continuous 5-day intravenous infusion to 10 patients with relapsed or refractory acute leukemia (7 ANLL, 1 ALL, 2 blast crisis of CGL). No complete or partial response was observed despite dose-limiting toxicity characterized by severe diarrhea in four patients and neutropenic colitis in two additional cases. We cannot recommend the present schedule of drug administration for the treatment of acute leukemia.     

Loss of biological activity due to Glu-->Arg mutation at residue 11 of the B subunit of cholera toxin

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose, toxicities, and potential antitumor activity of edatrexate (E), an antifolate agent with enhanced in vitro antitumor activity as compared with methotrexate (M), when given in combination with vinblastine, doxorubicin, cisplatin, and filgrastim (G-CSF) to patients with advanced malignancies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-seven patients with advanced malignancies were treated with escalating doses of edatrexate in combination with vinblastine (V), doxorubicin (A), cisplatin (C), and filgrastim (EVAC/G-CSF) following three different subsequently developed schedules. Schedule 1 was patterned after the MVAC regimen, a combination chemotherapy program with activity against different epithelial malignancies, and consisted of E, 40 mg/m2/day, days 1/15/22; V, 3 mg/m2/day, days 2/15/22; A, 30 mg/m2/ day, day 2; C, 70 mg/m2/day, day 2; repeated every 28 days. Schedules 2 and 3 were designed to avoid observed dose-limiting toxicity on schedule 1 consisting of transient elevation of serum creatinine levels and delayed myelosuppression. Schedule 2 consisted of E, 40 or 60 mg/ m2/day, days 1 and 15; V, 3 mg/m2/day, days 2 and 15; A, 30 mg/m2/day, day 2; C, 30 mg/m2/day, days 1 and 2; cycled every 28 days. Schedule 3 consisted of E, 60 to 120 mg/m2/day, day 1; V, 3 mg/m2/day, day 2; A, 30 mg/m2/day, day 2; C, 30 mg/m2/day, days 1 and 2; cycled every 21 days. Filgrastim 5 micrograms/kg/day was given to all patients subcutaneously until the absolute neutrophil count was greater than 10,000/microL postnadir. Three patients were treated on schedule 1, 10 on schedule 2 (four at an E dose of 40 mg/m2/day and six at an E dose of 60 mg/m2/day), and 24 on schedule 3 (six at each of the following E dosages: 60, 80, 100, and 120 mg/m2/day). RESULTS: Dose-limiting toxicities of grade 3 to 4 leukopenia and transient elevation of serum creatinine values were observed in two of three patients treated on schedule 1. A dose-limiting toxicity of grade 3 to 4 leukopenia was noted in two of six patients treated on schedule 2 at an edatrexate dose of 60 mg/m2/day. Two of six patients treated on schedule 3 at an edatrexate dose of 120 mg/m2/day had a dose-limiting toxicity of grade 3 stomatitis (one patient) and grade 3 cytopenia (one patient). Nineteen of 37 patients with evaluable or measurable disease had a response to treatment (response rate 51%, 95% confidence intervals = 35%-67%). Nine of 15 patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer responded, including one complete remission (response rate 60%, confidence intervals = 35%-85%). A median survival of 517 days (confidence interval = 163-808 days) and a 1-year survival rate of 60% (confidence interval = 35%-85%) was seen in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. CONCLUSIONS: The maximum tolerated dose and the recommended phase II dose of edatrexate is 100 mg/m2/day when administered as part of the EVAC/G-CSF program following schedule 3. Promising antineoplastic activity against non-small cell lung carcinomas was observed, and a phase II study is planned.     

Southwest Oncology Group phase II trial of concurrent carboplatin, etoposide, and radiation for poor-risk stage III non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE: A phase II study was conducted by the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) to assess the efficacy and toxicity of concurrent carboplatin, etoposide, and thoracic radiation (XRT) in a defined population of poor-risk patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with stage III NSCLC were eligible if they were excluded from cisplatin-based protocols because of poor pulmonary or renal function, history of congestive heart failure, hearing loss, peripheral neuropathy, or weight loss. Carboplatin 200 mg/m2 daily intravenously days 1, 3, 29, and 31 and etoposide 50 mg/m2 daily intravenously days 1 through 4 and 29 through 32 were administered. Beginning day 1, XRT was delivered at 1.8 to 2.0 Gy daily to a total dose of 61 Gy. RESULTS: Within a period of 1 year, 63 patients were registered and 60 were eligible. Patient characteristics were age 47 to 79 years, performance status 0 to 1 (82%) and 2 (18%), and stages IIIA (60%) and IIIB (40%) NSCLC. The most common grades 3 and 4 toxicities included leukopenia (50%), thrombocytopenia (23%), and esophagitis (15%). There were no treatment-related deaths. The overall confirmed response rate was 29%, and median overall survival was 13 months (95% confidence interval, 11 to 14 months). The 2-year survival rate was 21%. CONCLUSION: This chemoradiotherapy regimen is well tolerated in poor-risk patients and yields a median survival similar to that of good-risk patients who received cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy. This chemoradiotherapy regimen will be compared with XRT alone in poor-risk patients with stage III NSCLC in a randomized phase III trial.     

A phase I-II study of paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and vinorelbine with filgrastim (rhG-CSF) support in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE: We designed a phase I-II trial of three active agents, paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and vinorelbine, in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to: 1) define the dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of paclitaxel with filgrastim (G-CSF) support; and 2) determine the overall response rate and median survival of patients treated on this regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We treated cohorts of patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC with ifosfamide 1.2-1.6 g/m2/day x 3 and vinorelbine 20-25 mg/m2/day x 3 and escalating doses of paclitaxel at 100-175 mg/m2 on day 2 with G-CSF support on a 21-day cycle. One prior experimental single-agent chemotherapy regimen was allowed. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients, were enrolled on this trial: 27 on the phase I portion of the study and an additional 29 at the recommended phase II dose (RPTD). Thirteen patients had received prior chemotherapy. Paclitaxel doses of 175 mg/m2 and 150 mg/m2 produced dose-limiting myelosuppression, and the RPTD was determined to be paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 with ifosfamide 1.2 g/m2/day on days 1-3 and vinorelbine 20 mg/m2/ day on days 1-3 with G-CSF support. The overall response rate was 18%, with a median survival of 6.1 months. Six of 35 patients (17%) treated at the RPTD achieved a partial response to therapy. Grade IV neutropenia was observed in 19 of 35 patients at this dose, with eight patients suffering febrile neutropenia. CONCLUSIONS: This non-cisplatin-containing three-drug regimen has substantial toxicity and low activity in advanced NSCLC, and does not seem to improve on prior regimens. It is unclear whether the lack of efficacy relates to an antagonistic reaction between the specific drugs, administration schedule, or to subtherapeutic doses of the individual agents.     

Chronic recurrent multifocal hyperostosis of the long bones associated with hyperphosphatemia--a case report

BACKGROUND: JM216 is a new oral platinum complex with dose-limiting toxicity myelosuppression, now undergoing phase II evaluation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: JM216 was evaluated as first line therapy in non-small-cell lung cancer. Seventeen patients received 120 mg/m2/day for five days repeated every three weeks. RESULTS: Toxicity was manageable, the commonest side-effects being nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, constipation and asthenia. Myelososuppression was generally grade < 2 and there were no cases of neutropenic sepsis or bleeding. Thirteen patients were fully evaluable for response. No sustained objective responses were reported. One patient was reported as stable disease had a partial response after three courses but was progressing again after four. An additional five patients had stable disease (46.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Although some patients may have had useful palliation, JM216 did not appear to have significant antitumour activity in non-small-cell lung cancer.     

First-line treatment of advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma with docetaxel and vinorelbine

BACKGROUND: Docetaxel and vinorelbine are active agents in the treatment of nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). The efficacy and toxicity of this combination was evaluated in a Phase II study in patients with advanced NSCLC. METHODS: Forty-six chemotherapy-naive patients (44 men and 2 women with a median age of 64 years) with NSCLC (11 with Stage IIIB and 35 with Stage IV disease) were entered into the study; the World Health Organization (WHO) performance status was 0, 1, and 2 in 32, 11, and 3 patients, respectively. Patients received vinorelbine (25 mg/m2) on Day 1 and docetaxel (100 mg/m2) on Day 2 in cycles repeated every 3 weeks. Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor was given to all patients from Day 3 to Day 10. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-seven courses of chemotherapy were administered. Adverse events included WHO Grade 4 neutropenia (15 patients), Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia (3 patients), Grade 3 anemia (2 patients), Grade 2 and 3 neurotoxicity (7 patients and 1 patient, respectively), and Grade 3 fatigue (2 patients). Twenty patients (43%) required hospitalization: 11 (24%) for neutropenic fever (2 deaths from sepsis), and 9 (20%) for nonneutropenic pulmonary infections (2 deaths from cardiopulmonary insufficiency). The median overall survival was 5 months and the 1-year survival was 24%. Four complete responses (9.8%) and 11 partial responses (26.8%) (overall response rate of 36.6%; 95% confidence interval, 21.8-51.3%) were documented in 41 evaluable patients (intent-to-treat: 32.6%). Stable and progressive disease occurred in 13 patients each (31.7%). The median duration of response was 5 months and the median time to progression was 3 months (6 months for the responders). CONCLUSIONS: This schedule of docetaxel and vinorelbine combination is effective but its relatively high incidence of complicated neutropenia precludes its general use in patients with advanced NSCLC.     

Phase I trial of docetaxel and cisplatin in previously untreated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated doses (MTDs), principal toxicities, and pharmacokinetics of the combination of docetaxel and cisplatin administered every 3 weeks to patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have not received prior chemotherapy and to recommend a dose for phase II studies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced NSCLC and performance status 0 to 2 who had not received prior chemotherapy received docetaxel over 1 hour followed by cisplatin over 1 hour with hydration. Dose levels studied were (docetaxel/cisplatin) 50/75, 75/75, 75/100, and 100/75 mg/m2 repeated every 3 weeks. Colony-stimulating factor (CSF) support was not used. Pharmacokinetics of docetaxel and cisplatin were studied in the first cycle of therapy. Most patients (79%) had metastatic disease or intrathoracic recurrence after prior radiation and/or surgery. RESULTS: Of 24 patients entered, all were assessable for toxicity and 18 for response. The MTD schedules were docetaxel 75 mg/m2 with cisplatin 100 mg/m2 (dose-limiting toxicities [DLTs] in five of six patients), and docetaxel 100 mg/m2 with cisplatin 75 mg/m2 (DLTs in two of two patients, including one fatal toxicity). Limiting toxicities were febrile neutropenia and nonhematologic, principally diarrhea and renal. Two patients had neutropenic enterocolitis. Pharmacokinetics of both drugs were consistent with results from single-agent studies, which suggests no major pharmacokinetic interaction. Neutropenia was related to docetaxel area under the plasma concentration-versus-time curve (AUC). An alternative schedule was investigated, with cisplatin being administered over 3 hours commencing 3 hours after docetaxel, but toxicity did not appear to be less. Independently reviewed responses occurred in eight of 18 patients (44%; 95% confidence interval, 22% to 69%), most following 75 mg/m2 of both drugs. CONCLUSION: Docetaxel 75 mg/m2 over 1 hour followed by cisplatin 75 mg/m2 over 1 hour is recommended for phase II studies. The responses seen in this phase I study suggest a high degree of activity of this combination in previously untreated advanced NSCLC.     

A randomized comparison of the efficacy and toxicity of epirubicin and doxorubicin in the treatment of patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

BACKGROUND: Combination chemotherapy consisting of methotrexate, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisolone, and bleomycin (MACOP-B) has been frequently used for the treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. This randomized study was undertaken to assess the efficacy and toxicity of this regimen when either doxorubicin or epirubicin was used as the anthracycline drug. METHODS: Between April 1989 and December 1993, 211 previously untreated patients with intermediate grade and high grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma were randomized to receive either doxorubicin (n=106) or epirubicin (n=105) with the MACOP-B regimen. These patients were followed through December 1996. Numerous clinical features predictive of response and survival were analyzed. Cardiac and noncardiac toxicity in the two treatment arms were compared. RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 48 years. Complete remission was experienced by 122 patients (58.3%); 62 patients (58.5%) achieved complete remission in the doxorubicin arm and 60 (58.1%) in the epirubicin arm. Response rates, time to treatment failure, relapse data, and overall survival were comparable between the two arms. Morbidity due to mucositis, vomiting, peripheral neuropathy, and cardiotoxicity were also comparable. The overall mortality was 10%. Mortality due to neutropenic sepsis was considerably higher among patients who received epirubicin (10 patients) than among those who received doxorubicin (5 patients). Cardiac evaluation revealed no difference in toxicity between the two arms. CONCLUSIONS: Epirubicin was as effective as doxorubicin in terms of patients' responses to therapy. There was no difference in cardiotoxicity between the two treatment arms. However, in this study, the mortality due to neutropenic sepsis was significantly higher among patients treated with epirubicin.     

A phase II trial of 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and carboplatin in patients with unresectable biliary tree carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Unresectable adenocarcinoma of the biliary tree are associated with a very poor prognosis. 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) combination regimens have produced objective response rates in approximately 10-20% of patients. Leucovorin increases the selective cytotoxicity of 5-FU. There also are encouraging reports of carboplatin in combination with 5-FU in other gastrointestinal tract malignancies. METHODS: Fourteen consecutive eligible patients were treated with a combination of carboplatin, 300 mg/m2, intravenously (i.v.) on Day 1 only and 5-FU, 400 mg/m2, i.v. with leucovorin, 25 mg/m2, i.v. on Days 1-4. All patients were required to have a histologically confirmed diagnosis and measurable disease. Patients were evaluated for response, survival, and toxicity. RESULTS: A total of 48 cycles of therapy were delivered. The median survival was 5 months. One patient achieved complete remission and two others partial remission, for a total response rate of 21.4%. Four additional patients had stable disease for a median duration of 4 months. The therapy was well tolerated, with moderate myelosuppression as the main dose-limiting toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: The current combination regimen of leucovorin-modulated 5-FU with carboplatin is well tolerated with appropriate supportive care, produces significant objective responses in 21% of patients with biliary tree carcinoma, and should be considered for the treatment of this disease.     

p53 autoantibodies in the sera, cyst and ascitic fluids of patients with ovarian cancer

LY231514 is a novel antifolate that principally inhibits thymidylate synthase, but with additional folate-dependent enzyme targets. A Phase I study of single-agent LY231514 administered as a daily i.v. infusion over 10 minutes for 5 days, repeated every 3 weeks, was conducted to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose, pharmacokinetic profile, and antitumor activity of the drug using this schedule. Thirty-eight patients with advanced malignancies that were refractory or not amenable to standard therapy were treated with a total of 116 courses of LY231514, escalating treatment doses through 10 dose levels, from 0.2-5.2 mg/m2/day. No objective clinical responses were observed, although minor antitumor activity not fulfilling the response criteria was seen in three patients. A maximum tolerated dose of 4.0 mg/m2/day was determined, with neutropenia as the predominant dose-limiting toxicity. Reversible disturbances of liver biochemistry, fulfilling the protocol definitions of dose-limiting toxicity, were also observed. Other toxicities included diarrhea, mucositis, skin rash, and fatigue. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed at all treatment levels. Analysis showed a linear relation between administered dose and both maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration/time curve. The drug was cleared with a day 1 total body clearance of 108.9 +/- 38.8 ml/min/m2, with plasma concentrations declining with a mean harmonic terminal half-life of 1.4 +/- 0.98 h. When given by this schedule, LY231514 is tolerable, and Phase II studies are in progress.     

Continuous infusional topotecan in advanced breast and non-small-cell lung cancer: no evidence of increased efficacy

Two open, phase II studies were performed to evaluate the activity and toxicity of infusional topotecan in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) and advanced breast cancer who had not received previous chemotherapy for metastatic disease. Twenty-five patients with an ECOG performance score < 2 were treated with infusional topotecan administered as a daily, continuous intravenous infusion starting at 0.6 mg m(-2) day(-1) (NSCLC) and 0.5 mg m(-2) day(-1) (breast cancer) for 21 days every 4 weeks. Three patients achieved a partial response as defined by WHO criteria: one with NSCLC (8%; 95% CI 0-39%) and two with advanced breast cancer (15%; 95% CI 2-45%). The major toxicities were neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, with one episode of neutropenic sepsis. These data suggest that topotecan delivered as a continuous intravenous infusion over 21 days as single-agent therapy does not appear to offer a clinical advantage over conventional 5-day schedules against advanced NSCLC and advanced breast cancer.     

Mitomycin C, vinblastine, and carboplatin regimen in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer. A phase II trial

BACKGROUND: The mitomycin C, vinblastine, and cisplatin (MVP) combination is one of the most frequently used in the palliative setting, but it produces considerable toxicity. Carboplatin and cisplatin have different patterns of toxicity. The goal of this study was to evaluate a combination similar to MVP, using carboplatin instead of cisplatin to render it more feasible in an outpatient setting. METHODS: Inclusion criteria for this study included: inoperable patients or patients relapsing after previous surgery, with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), a performance status (PS) > 50%, and no previous chemotherapy. The chemotherapy regimen included carboplatin, 300 mg/m2 on Day 1; mitomycin, 8 mg/m2 on Day 1; and vinblastine, 4 mg/m2 on Days 1, 8, and 15 (on Day 15 vinblastine was delivered only in the first cycle) (MVC) every 3 weeks for at least 3 cycles. RESULTS: From August 1991 until August 1994, 70 patients entered the trial. All were evaluable for toxicity and response. The median age was 62 years (range, 40-73 years). The male/female ratio was 60:10 (86%:14%); the ratio of Stage III to Stage IV disease was 26:44 (37%:63%); and the ratio of PS > 70 to < or = 70 was 49:21. A total of 296 cycles (median, 4 [range, 1-6 cycles] per patient) were delivered, 280 of 296 (95%) in an outpatient setting with only 4 patients requiring hospitalization for treatment delivery. Overall response rate (RR) was 38.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 27-51%) (1 complete response, 1.5%; 26 partial responses, 37.1%). Median duration of response was 9.8 months (range, 2-27 months). In Stage III patients the RR was 42% and in Stage IV patients it was 34%. Overall median survival was 9.5 months (95% CI, 6.8-15.3 months). Survival at 1 year was 39% (standard error [SE] 3.6%) and was 11% at 2 years (SE 3.6%). In Stage III patients median survival was 13 months and the 1-year survival rate was 54% (SE 10%); Stage IV patients had a median survival of 7.4 months and a 1-year survival rate of 28% (SE 7%). Delivered dose intensity was: carboplatin, 71%; vinblastine, 60%; and mitomycin C, 77% of the planned dose intensity. The back calculation of carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) with Calvert's formula and with the Cockcroft-Gault glomerular filtration rate estimation, showed a median AUC value of 4 (range, 2-8). Using the more precise Chatelut formula, AUC was again 4 (range, 2-7). Hematologic toxicity was the major side effect; Grades 3 and 4 leukopenia were observed in 34% and 6% of patients, respectively, and Grades 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia in 25% and 4% of patients, respectively. Grade 2 infection occurred in 10% of patients, with only 1 case of sepsis; severe constipation and Grade 2 alopecia occurred in only 1 patient; and no case of higher than Grade 1 nephrotoxicity was observed. No pulmonary toxicity was observed. Compliance with treatment was good with only one patient refusal after the first cycle. CONCLUSIONS: Chemotherapy for advanced NSCLS is still controversial, because effectiveness in terms of RR and symptom control must be weighed against treatment toxicity and costs. From our study it appears that MVC is easy to deliver in an outpatient setting, and has good patient compliance, low toxicity profile, and promising RR and response duration. The substitution of carboplatin for cisplatin in regimens for advanced NSCLC should be considered.     

Interleukin 6, but not tumour necrosis factor-alpha, is a good predictor of severe infection in febrile neutropenic and non-neutropenic children with malignancy

OBJECTIVE: Interleukin-6 (IL6), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) and interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) are important mediators of the inflammatory response in human infection. The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between serum levels of IL6, TNF-alpha, IFN-gamma and CRP in febrile children with malignant disease, and relate these levels to aetiology of fever, presence of neutropenia and the effect of untreated malignancy. METHODS: 110 febrile episodes in 70 children with malignant disease were included. Cytokine analyses were performed with sensitive immunoradiometric methods using double monoclonal antibodies. RESULTS: IL6 had a sensitivity of 74% in detecting sepsis in children with fever and malignant disease. This sensitivity was not influenced by the presence of neutropenia or newly diagnosed malignancy. A positive correlation between IL6 and the CRP levels on the following day was observed (r = .53). TNF-alpha was elevated in 22% of the episodes and mean levels were significantly higher in untreated malignancy but lower in neutropenic patients. IFN-gamma was elevated in 18% of cases and correlated strongly with mean TNF-alpha levels. CONCLUSIONS: IL6 is a sensitive and early predictor of bacterial infection in both neutropenic and non-neutropenic febrile children with malignancy. It is more sensitive than CRP in detecting sepsis, but the predictive value is too low to allow IL6 levels to influence initial treatment decisions in patients with granulocytopenia. TNF-alpha production seems to be impaired in neutropenic children and serum TNF-alpha cannot be employed as an indicator of bacterial infection.     

Dose escalation of the hypoxic cell sensitizer etanidazole combined with ifosfamide, carboplatin, etoposide, and autologous hematopoietic stem cell support

Multiple mechanisms of drug resistance contribute to treatment failure. Although high-dose therapy attempts to overwhelm these defenses pharmacologically, this approach is only successful in a fraction of treated patients. Many drug resistance mechanisms are shared between malignant and normal cells, but the expression of various drug resistance mechanisms associated with hypoxia is largely confined to tumor tissue. Thus, reversal of this mechanism is likely to provide a therapeutic advantage to the host. This study was designed to define the dose-limiting toxicities and maximum tolerated dose of etanidazole when it is given concurrently with high-dose ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide (ICE), with hematopoietic stem cell support. The maximum tolerated doses of high-dose ICE were administered concurrently with dose escalations of etanidazole, a hypoxic cell sensitizer. All agents were given by 96-h continuous i.v. infusion beginning on day -7. Mesna uroprotection was provided. Autologous marrow and cytokine mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cells were reinfused on day 0. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was administered following reinfusion until the granulocytes recovered to > 1000/microliter. Fifty-five adults with advanced malignancies were enrolled in cohorts of five to nine patients. Four dose levels of etanidazole between 3 and 5.5 g/m2/day (12, 16, 20, and 22 g/m2 total doses) and two doses of carboplatin (1600 and 1800 mg/m2 total doses) were evaluated. Seven patients died of organ toxicity (13%); two each from veno-occlusive disease of liver and sepsis; and one each from sudden death, renal failure, and refractory thrombocytopenic hemorrhage. Five deaths occurred at the top dose level. One additional patient suffered a witnessed cardiorespiratory arrest from ventricular fibrillation and was resuscitated. Dose-dependent and largely reversible peripheral neuropathy was observed consisting of two syndromes: severe cramping myalgic/neuralgic pain, predominantly in stocking glove distribution, occurring between day -3 and day 0, and a sensory peripheral neuropathy with similar distribution peaking around day +60. The maximal achievable dose of etanidazole (16 g/m2 dose level) resulted in a mean serum level of 38 micrograms/ml (25-55 micrograms/ml). Etanidazole significantly enhanced host toxicity of high-dose ICE. Effective modulatory doses of etanidazole could not be given with acceptable toxicity using this schedule.     

High-dose edatrexate with oral leucovorin rescue: a phase I and clinical pharmacological study in adults with advanced cancer

Our objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose and toxicity of i.v. edatrexate with p.o. leucovorin. Thirty-one adults with advanced solid tumors received edatrexate as a 2-h infusion, once a week for 3 weeks, recycled every 28 days. p.o. leucovorin (10 mg/m2, every 6 h for 10 doses) began 24 h later. All had urinary alkalinization and p.o. hydration. Nine dosage levels ranging from 120 to 3750 mg/m2 were explored. Fatigue, epistaxis, nausea/emesis, mucositis, rash, myalgias, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and transient elevations of serum aspartate transferase were observed. Leukoencephalopathy with clinical manifestations occurred in two patients (one had prior cranial irradiation). Pharmacokinetic studies carried out at the 120- and 1080-mg/m2 dose levels revealed no significant difference in the elimination half-life at the two dose levels studied and no significant intrapatient variability between day 1 and day 8 edatrexate administration. Serum edatrexate levels measured using a dihydrofolate reductase inhibition assay correlated with those by high-performance liquid chromatography. Three major and two minor antitumor responses occurred. The maximum tolerated dose was 3750 mg/m2, with grade 3 or 4 leukopenia (one patient), stomatitis (one patient), and leukoencephalopathy (one patient). Because of the occurrence of leukoencephalopathy, further study of high-dose edatrexate with leucovorin rescue is not recommended.     

The impact of mucositis on alpha-hemolytic streptococcal infection in patients undergoing autologous bone marrow transplantation for hematologic malignancies

BACKGROUND: Antibacterial prophylaxis with quinolone antibiotics has resulted in an increase in streptococcal infections among bone marrow transplantation (BMT) recipients with myelosuppression. Oral ulceration (mucositis), which frequently occurs as a consequence of chemotherapy, has been implicated as a significant portal of entry for streptococci. The objectives of this study were to confirm the correlation between mucositis and streptococcal bacteremia, determine the risk associated with this correlation, and evaluate the impact of mucositis and streptococcal bacteremia on hospital course and costs associated with autologous BMT. METHODS: This was a retrospective, case-control study in which the charts of autologous BMT recipients treated for hematologic malignancies between 1990 and 1996 were reviewed. Twenty-four patients were identified who met the criteria of autologous BMT; their blood cultures confirmed (x2) alpha-hemolytic streptococcal sepsis. A control group of 45 without positive cultures was matched by gender, age, diagnosis, and treatment to the study group. RESULTS: The results confirm that ulcerative mucositis is a significant risk factor for alpha-hemolytic streptococcal bacteremia among autologous BMT patients. Of the 24 patients with bacteremia, 15 of 24 (62%) had ulcerative mucositis, compared with 16 of 45 (36%) of patients in the control population (P < 0.05). Patients with ulcerative mucositis were found to be three times as likely to develop alpha-hemolytic streptococcal bacteremia as those without ulcerative mucositis (odds ratio=3.02). Both independently and as a cofactor associated with bacteremia, mucositis adversely affected the length of hospital stay (LOS). Of all the patients studied, those with oral ulcerations had a LOS of 34 days, compared with 29 days for patients without oral ulcerations (P < 0.05). Of patients in the study group, those with oral ulcerations stayed in the hospital 6 days longer than patients without oral ulcerations (40 days vs. 34 days, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Oral ulcerative mucositis is a significant, common, and important risk factor for alpha-hemolytic streptococcal bacteremia in BMT recipients with myelosuppression; it results in longer hospital stay and increased costs.     

High-dose thiotepa and etoposide-based regimens with autologous hematopoietic support for high-risk or recurrent CNS tumors in children and adults

The prognosis in patients with primary brain tumors treated with surgery, radiotherapy and conventional chemotherapy remains poor. To improve outcome, combination high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) has been explored in children, but rarely in adults. This study was performed to determine the tolerability of three-drug combination high-dose thiotepa (T) and etoposide (E)-based regimens in pediatric and adult patients with high-risk or recurrent primary brain tumors. Thirty-one patients (13 children and 18 adults) with brain tumors were treated with high-dose chemotherapy: 19 with BCNU (B) and TE (BTE regimen), and 12 with carboplatin (C) and TE (CTE regimen). Patients received growth factors and hematopoietic support with marrow (n = 15), peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) (n = 11) or both (n = 5). The 100 day toxic mortality rate was 3% (1/31). Grade III/IV toxicities included mucositis (58%), hepatitis (39%) and diarrhea (42%). Five patients had seizures and two had transient encephalopathy (23%). All patients had neutropenic fever and all pediatric patients required hyperalimentation. Median time to engraftment with absolute neutrophil count (ANC) >0.5 x 10(9)/l was 11 days (range 8-37 days). Time to ANC engraftment was significantly longer (P = 0.0001) in patients receiving marrow (median 14 days, range 10-37) than for PBPC (median 9.5 days, range 8-10). Platelet engraftment >50 x 10(9)/l was 24 days (range 14-53 days) in children. In adults, platelet engraftment >20 x 10(9)/l was 12 days (range 9-65 days). In 11 patients supported with PBPC, there was a significant inverse correlation between CD34+ dose and days to ANC (rho = -0.87, P = 0.009) and platelet engraftment (rho = -0.85, P = 0.005), with CD34+ dose predicting time to engraftment following HDC. Overall, 30% of evaluable patients (7/24) had a complete response (CR) (n = 3) or partial response (PR) (n = 4). Median time to tumor progression (TTP) was 7 months, with an overall median survival of 12 months. These TE-based BCNU or carboplatin three-drug combination HDC regimens are safe and tolerable with promising response rates in both children and older adults.     

Use of a general surgical high dependency unit in a district general hospital: the first 10 years

The chemotherapy regimen of paclitaxel and carboplatin produces an objective response in 30%-60% of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In a prospective study, we administered paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 (by 1-3-hr infusion) and carboplatin at an area under the plasma concentration curve (AUC) of 5 (by the Calvert formula) every 3 weeks to 21 patients who had previously received predominantly platinum-based chemotherapy for NSCLC. We observed no objective responses. Patients received a median of 2 cycles before disease progression. Three of 5 patients who had received only single-agent treatment with a relatively inactive agent may have had modest clinical benefit. We conclude that the paclitaxel/carboplatin regimen has minimal activity in previously treated patients with NSCLC.     

A better therapeutic profile for the combination of mitomycin-C, ifosfamide and cisplatin (MIC) in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a useful dose-schedule modification

BACKGROUND: In our previous experience with chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) the combination of mitomycin, ifosfamide and cisplatin (MIC) showed the highest activity in a three-arm randomized trial; the MIC regimen also yielded the most toxic effects, with 8% WHO grade 2-4 nephrotoxicity, 21% grade 3-4 leukopenia and 10% grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia. In that study cisplatin (120 mg/m2) was delivered on day 1 and ifosfamide and mitomycin on day 2. In an effort to reduce MIC toxicity a modified regimen was tested in a phase II trial: cisplatin 100 mg/m2 was given on day 2 and ifosfamide on day 1 with mitomycin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From November 1993 to December 1995, 70 advanced NSCLC patients entered the trial. RESULTS: Twenty-nine of 70 patients achieved major response (41%) with 6 complete (9%) and 23 partial remissions (33%). We recorded 4% of WHO grade 3-4 anemia, and 2% of leukopenia and thrombocytopenia. CONCLUSION: We confirmed the activity of the MIC regimen in NSCLC, and the modified schedule seems to substantially improve the safety of the combination.