Characterization of a point mutation in the hormone binding domain of the estrogen receptor from an breast tumor

It is clear that growth of the MCF-7 breast cancer cell line is stimulated by estrogen and when estrogen is removed, growth slows. We have observed a tumor derived from MCF-7 cells that grows in athymic mice in the absence of estrogen stimulation. We hypothesized that a mutation in the estrogen receptor (ER) could be responsible for this constitutive growth. Using single stranded conformational polymorphism (SSCP) and DNA sequencing analysis, we have identified an ER containing a point mutation at position 415 (gly to val) within the hormone binding domain. The functional activity of this mutant was assessed in vitro and in vivo. Using transient transfection into an ER negative breast cancer cell with an ERE luciferase reporter gene, we found that both the wild-type and mutant receptors have similar efficacy. Additionally, the estrogenic responses were blocked by antiestrogens in a concentration related manner. We also found that tumors with the mutant receptor show similar growth response in athymic mice as wild-type: stimulation with estradiol and inhibition with antiestrogens. We conclude that the point mutation at position 415 (gly to val) is not responsible for constitutive growth.     

Interaction and dissociation by ligands of estrogen receptor and Hsp90: the antiestrogen RU 58668 induces a protein synthesis-dependent clustering of the receptor in the cytoplasm

The in vivo interaction of estrogen receptor (ER) and Hsp90, demonstrated in the absence of hormone by a nuclear cotranslocation assay of the cytoplasmic Hsp90 with the karyophilic receptor, was disrupted by agonist and antagonist ligands, which, after dissociating the Hsp90, allowed the chaperone protein to be relocalized in the cytoplasm. The pure antiestrogen RU 58668 (RU), which was unable to stimulate an estrogen-dependent reporter gene and completely inhibited its estradiol-induced activity, also profoundly modified the subcellular distribution of ER in a specific time- and dose-dependent manner; ER appeared as speckled fluorescent clusters mainly located in the perinuclear region of the cytoplasm. The kinetics of appearance and reversal of the RU-dependent ER mislocalization in the presence or absence of cycloheximide demonstrated 1) that this effect was reversed by RU withdrawal or estradiol (E2) treatment, and 2) that cycloheximide with RU inhibited and reversed the ER cytoplasmic mislocalization induced by RU alone. These results point to a protein synthesis-dependent step in the mechanism of action of this antiestrogen. After RU treatment, a large portion of ER was found in the particulate fraction of the cytoplasm. However, confocal and electron microscopic analysis showed that ER clusters were not associated with specific cytoplasmic organelles or compartments. Using ER mutants, it was found that the ligand binding domain was sufficient for RU to produce receptor mislocalization, while the constitutive nuclear localization signals were dispensable. We propose that the antiestrogenic properties of RU are primarily due to the induction of an aggregation-prone receptor conformation that cannot undertake the constitutive and the ligand-induced nuclear localization function of the receptor because it is sequestered in the cytoplasm by fast turning over protein(s). We predict that antiestrogens able to block ER nuclear localization will behave as pure antihormones and will inhibit all the nuclear action of ER elicited by agonistic ligands or by ligand-independent mechanisms such as growth factor stimulation.     

Constitutive activation of cyclic AMP but not phosphatidylinositol signaling caused by four mutations in the 6th transmembrane helix of the human thyrotropin receptor

Four different somatic mutations (F631C, T632I, D633E, and D633Y) in the putative 6th transmembrane helix of the human thyrotropin receptor (TSHR) were recently described in hyperfunctioning thyroid adenomas [Porcellini et al. (1994) J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 79, 657-661]. We transiently expressed these mutant receptors in Cos-7 cells and measured [125I]TSH binding, basal and TSH-stimulated cAMP production, and phosphatidylinositol hydrolysis. The concentration of receptors expressed at the cell surface was lower for the mutants than for the wild type (WT) TSHR. Compared to the WT, all four mutant receptors caused a marked increase in basal cAMP levels, but did not increase basal production of inositol phosphates. This suggests that autonomous thyroid function and adenoma formation may be related to constitutive activation of the cAMP pathway alone. A cluster of conserved residues at the base of the 6th transmembrane helix of the TSHR and other glycoprotein hormone receptors appears important for maintaining an inactive receptor conformation.