A new method of low-temperature methanol synthesis on Cu/ZnO/Al2O3 catalysts from CO/CO2/H2

A new synthesis method of low-temperature methanol proceeded on Cu/ZnO/Al₂O₃ catalysts from CO/CO₂/H₂ using 2-butanol as promoters. The Cu/ZnO/Al₂O₃ catalysts were prepared by co-impregnation of r-Al₂O₃ with an aqueous solution of copper nitrate and zinc nitrate. The total carbon turnover frequency (TOF), the yield and selectivity of methanol were the highest by using the Cu/ZnO/Al₂O₃ catalyst with copper loading of 5% and the Zn/Cu molar ratio of 1/1, which precursor were not calcined, and reduced at 493 K. The activity of the catalysts increased due to the presence of the CuO/ZnO phase in the oxidized form of impregnation Cu/ZnO/Al₂O₃ catalysts. The active sites of the Cu/ZnO/Al₂O₃ catalyst for methanol synthesis are not only metallic Cu but also special sites such as the Cu–Zn site, i.e. metallic Cu and the Cu–Zn site work cooperatively to catalyze the methanol synthesis reaction.     

CO removal from reformed fuel over Cu/ZnO/Al2O3 catalysts prepared by impregnation and coprecipitation methods

A composition of Cu/ZnO/Al₂O₃ catalysts prepared by the impregnation method was optimized for water gas shift reaction (WGSR) coupled with CO oxidation in the reformed gas. The optimum composition of the impregnated catalyst for high WGSR activity was 5 wt.% Cu/5 wt.% ZnO/Al₂O₃. The optimum loading amounts of Cu and ZnO in the impregnated catalyst were smaller than those in the coprecipitated catalyst. Its catalytic activity above 200 °C was comparable to that of the conventional coprecipitated Cu/ZnO/Al₂O₃ catalyst. However, the activity of the impregnated Cu/ZnO/Al₂O₃ catalysts was significantly lowered at 150 °C, whereas no deactivation was observed for the coprecipitated catalyst at the same temperature. It was found that deactivation occurred over impregnated catalysts with H₂O and/or O₂ in the reaction gas; it prevented CO adsorption on the surface.     

CO2 Hydrogenation to Methanol Over Cu/ZnO/Al2O3 Catalysts Prepared by a Novel Gel-Network-Coprecipitation Method

A novel gel-network-coprecipitation process has been developed to prepare ultrafine Cu/ZnO/Al₂O₃ catalysts for methanol synthesis from CO₂ hydrogenation. It is demonstrated that the gel-network-coprecipitation method can allow the preparation of the ultrafine Cu/ZnO/Al₂O₃ catalysts by homogeneous coprecipitation of the metal nitrate salts in the gel network formed by gelatin solution, which makes the metallic copper in the reduced catalyst exist in much smaller crystallite size and exhibit a much higher metallic copper-specific surface area. The effect of the gel concentration of gelatin on the structure, morphology and catalytic properties of the Cu/ZnO/Al₂O₃ catalysts for methanol synthesis from hydrogenation of carbon dioxide was investigated. The Cu/ZnO/Al₂O₃ catalysts prepared by the gel-network-coprecipitation method exhibit a high catalytic activity and selectivity in CO₂ hydrogenation to methanol.     

Correlation of activity and stability of CuO/ZnO/Al2O3 methanol steam reforming catalysts with Cu/Zn composition obtained by SEM–EDAX analysis

A series of CuO/ZnO/Al₂O₃ catalysts were prepared and characterized by TPR, surface area, metal area, XRD and SEM–EDAX analysis. These systems were evaluated in the development of a methanol steam reforming catalyst (MSR). A correlation of activity and stability of MSR catalysts with the Cu/Zn ratio derived by SEM–EDAX analysis is observed. The stable activity of these catalysts is also supported by the method of preparation, low temperature reducibility and the presence of reversibly oxidizable Cu species observed by TPR of fresh and used catalysts.     

Synergetic effect of combined use of Cu–ZnO–Al2O3 and Pt–Al2O3 for the steam reforming of methanol

Commercial Cu–ZnO–Al₂O₃ catalysts are used widely for steam reforming of methanol. However, the reforming reactions should be modified to avoid fuel cell catalyst poisoning originated from carbon monoxide. The modification was implemented by mixing the Cu–ZnO–Al₂O₃ catalyst with Pt–Al₂O₃ catalyst. The Pt–Al₂O₃ and Cu–ZnO–Al₂O₃ catalyst mixture created a synergetic effect because the methanol decomposition and the water–gas shift reactions occurred simultaneously over nearby Pt–Al₂O₃ and Cu–ZnO–Al₂O₃ catalysts in the mixture. A methanol conversion of 96.4% was obtained and carbon monoxide was not detected from the reforming reaction when the Pt–Al₂O₃ and Cu–ZnO–Al₂O₃ catalyst mixture was used.     

Methanol synthesis pathway over Cu/ZrO2 catalysts: a time‐resolved DRIFT 13C‐labelling experiment

X-ray diffraction (XRD) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) have been used to characterize a series of Cu/Ce/Al₂O₃ catalysts. Catalysts were prepared by incipient wetness impregnation using metal nitrate and alkoxide precursors. Catalyst loadings were held constant at 12 wt% CuO and 5.1 wt% CeO₂. Mixed oxide catalysts were prepared by impregnation of cerium first, followed by copper. The information obtained from surface and bulk characterization has been correlated with CO and CH₄ oxidation activity of the catalysts. Cu/Al₂O₃ catalysts prepared using Cu(II) nitrate (CuN) and Cu(II) ethoxide (CuA) precursors consist of a mixture of copper surface phase and crystalline CuO. The CuA catalyst shows higher dispersion, less crystalline CuO phase, and lower oxidation activity for CO and CH₄ than the CuN catalyst. For Cu/Ce/Al₂O₃ catalysts, Ce has little effect on the dispersion and crystallinity of the copper species. However, Cu impregnation decreases the Ce dispersion and increases the amount of crystalline CeO₂ present in the catalysts, particularly in Ce modified alumina prepared using cerium alkoxide precursor (CeA). Cerium addition dramatically increases the CO oxidation activity, however, it has little effect on CH₄ oxidation. This revised version was published online in July 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Activity and Selectivity of a Nanostructured CuO/ZrO2 Catalyst in the Steam Reforming of Methanol

Steam reforming of methanol for production of hydrogen can be carried out over copper based catalyst. In the work presented here, the catalytic properties of a CuO/ZrO₂ catalyst (8.5wt%) synthesised by a templating technique were investigated with respect to activity, long term stability, CO formation, and response to oxygen addition to the feed. The results were obtained using a fixed bed reactor and compared to a commercial methanol synthesis catalyst CuO/ZnO/Al₂O₃. It is shown that, depending on the time on stream, the temporary addition of oxygen to the feed has a beneficial effect on the activity of the CuO/ZrO₂ catalyst. After activation, the CuO/ZrO₂ catalyst is found to be more active (per copper mass) than the CuO/ZnO/Al₂O₃ system, more stable during time on stream (measured up to 250h), and to produce less CO. Structural characterisation by means of X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) and X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) reveals that the catalyst (as prepared) consists of crystalline, tetragonal zirconia with small domain sizes (about 60Å) and small/disordered crystallites of CuO.     

Direct synthesis of dimethyl ether from carbon-monoxide-rich synthesis gas: Influence of dehydration catalysts and operating conditions

Various dehydration catalysts were studied in the synthesis of dimethyl ether (DME) directly from carbon-monoxide-rich synthesis gas under a series of different reaction conditions. The investigated catalyst systems consisted of combinations of a methanol catalyst (CuO/ZnO system) with catalysts for methanol dehydration based on γ-Al₂O₃ or zeolites and γ-Al₂O₃ was identified as the most favorable dehydration catalyst. Various reaction parameters such as temperature, H₂/CO ratio and space velocity were studied. The impact of water on Cu/ZnO/Al₂O₃-γ-Al₂O₃ catalysts was investigated and no deactivation could be observed at water contents below 10% during running times of several hours. A running time of several days and a water content of 10% led to a significant increase of CO conversion but the water gas shift reaction became dominating and CO₂ was the main product. After termination of water feeding significant deactivation of the catalyst system was observed but the system returned to high DME selectivity. Catalyst stability and the influence of CO₂ in the gas feed were studied in experiments lasting for about three weeks. The presence of 8% of CO₂ caused an approximately 10% lower CO conversion and an about 5% lower DME selectivity compared to the reaction system without CO₂.     

Methanol synthesis over Cu/SiO2 catalysts

The rates of CO and CO/CO₂ hydrogenation at 4.2 MPa and 523 K are reported for a series of Cu/SiO₂ catalysts containing 2 to 88 wt.% Cu. These catalysts were prepared on a variety of silica sources using several different Cu deposition techniques. In CO/CO₂ hydrogenation, the rate of methanol formation is proportional to the exposed Cu surface area of the reduced catalyst precursor, as determined by N₂O frontal chromatography. The observed rate, 4.2×10^–3 mole CH₃OH/Cu site-sec, is within a factor of three of the rates reported by others over Cu/ZnO and Cu/ZnO/Al₂O₃ catalysts under comparable conditions. These results suggest that the ZnO component is only a moderate promoter in methanol synthesis. Hydrogenation of CO over these catalysts also gives methanol with high selectivity, but the synthesis rate is not proportional to the Cu surface area. This implies that another type of site, either alone or in cooperation with Cu, is involved in the synthesis of methanol from CO.     

Fischer-Tropsch synthesis and the generation of DME in situ

Ternary physical mixtures comprised a Fischer-Tropsch catalyst, a methanol synthesis catalyst and a zeolite employed in the hydrocarbon synthesis from syngas. Two Fe-based catalysts (i.e., one promoted by K and the other by Ru), two HY zeolites with different acidities, a commercial HZSM-5 and Cu/ZnO/Al₂O₃ (methanol synthesis catalyst) were used in these systems. The main products obtained were dimethyl ether, methanol and hydrocarbons. First of all, it was observed that by adding Cu/ZnO/Al₂O₃ catalyst to a binary physical mixture comprised of a Fischer-Tropsch catalyst and HZSM-5, the CO conversion increases more than 20 times. Second, during the reaction transient period the dimethyl ether selectivity decreases as the conversion increases. Third, the hydrocarbons synthesized followed the ASF distribution in the C₁-C₁₂ range and finally, it was also verified that the Y zeolites and the Fischer-Tropsch synthesis catalyst promoted by Ru generated the most active physical mixtures. The results showed that the role of zeolites in the ternary physical mixture is only associated with the dimethyl ether synthesis. The following reaction pathway was suggested: first, methanol is synthesized from syngas using Cu/ZnO/Al₂O₃ catalyst; after that, this alcohol is dehydrated by an acid catalyst generating DME; and lastly, DME initiates Fischer-Tropsch synthesis, which is then propagated by CO.     

Methylcyclohexane conversion over ZSM-11 zeolite

The effect of various modifiers on the performance of a commercial Cu/ZnO/Al₂O₃ catalyst in methanol synthesis from CO₂/H₂ and CO/H₂ at 523 K and 30 bar has been studied. Several modifiers improved significantly the rate of methanol formation from CO₂/H₂, while all modified catalysts showed decreased rates for the synthesis from CO/H₂ in comparison with the unmodified Cu/ZnO/Al₂O₃ catalyst. The synthesis rates from both CO₂/H₂ and CO/H₂ correlated with the oxygen coverage of copper surface measured after the reaction by N₂O titration.     

Deactivation of Supported Copper Catalysts for Methanol Synthesis

Binary Cu/ZnO and Cu/Al₂O₃ as well as ternary Cu/ZnO/Al₂O₃ catalysts were investigated with respect to their catalytic activity and stability in methanol synthesis. In a rapid aging test, activity measurements were carried out in combination with the determination of the specific Cu surface area. A close correlation between the loss of catalytic activity and the decrease in specific Cu surface area was found due to sintering of the Cu particles. Differences in the deactivation behavior and the area-activity relationship of each catalyst system imply that the catalysts should be grouped in different classes.     

Pd/ZnO催化剂上甲醇水蒸气重整制氢

研究了并流共沉淀法制备的Pd/ZnO催化剂上的甲醇水蒸气重整制氢反应.考察了钯含量、还原温度、反应温度、重时空速（WHSV）和水-甲醇摩尔比（水醇比）对反应的影响.研究结果表明,当钯质量分数为15.9%,反应温度为523～573 K,还原温度为523～573 K,水醇比为1.0～1.2,WHSV=17.2 h^-1时,反应具有较好的CH3OH转化率、CO₂选择性、H₂产率及较低的出口CO摩尔分数.与铜基催化剂相比,Pd/ZnO催化剂表现出较好的稳定性.     

CO/FTIR Spectroscopic Characterization of Pd/ZnO/Al2O3 Catalysts for Methanol Steam Reforming

An as-synthesized 8.8wt% Pd/ZnO/Al₂O₃ catalyst was either pretreated under O₂ at 773 K followed by H₂ at 293 K or under H₂ at 773 K to obtain, respectively, a supported metallic Pd° catalyst (Pd°/ZnO/Al₂O₃) or a supported PdZn alloy catalyst (PdZn/ZnO/Al₂O₃). Both catalysts were studied by CO adsorption using FTIR spectroscopy. For the supported PdZn alloy catalyst (PdZn/ZnO/Al₂O₃), exposure to a mixture of methanol and steam, simulating methanol steam reforming reaction conditions, does not change the catalyst surface composition. This implies that the active sites are PdZn alloy like structures. The exposure of the catalyst to an oxidizing environment (O₂ at 623 K) results in the break up of PdZn alloy, forming a readily reducible PdO with its metallic form being known as much less active and selective for methanol steam reforming. However, for the metallic Pd°/ZnO/Al₂O₃ catalyst, FTIR results indicate that metallic Pd° can transform to PdZn alloy under methanol steam reforming conditions. These results suggest that PdZn alloy, even after an accidental exposure to oxygen, can self repair to form the active PdZn alloy phase under methanol steam reforming conditions. Catalytic behavior of the PdZn/ZnO/Al₂O₃ catalyst also correlates well with the surface composition characterizations by FTIR/CO spectroscopy.     

Chemical and Physical Properties of Copper-Based Catalysts for CO Shift Reaction and Methanol Synthesis

The modern low-pressure methanol synthesis catalysts are based on copper-containing systems such as Cu/ZnO/Al₂O₃ and Cu/ZnO/Cr₂O₃ with various compositions. These catalysts are also highly active for the low-temperature CO shift reaction. For both reactions the nature of the active sites is still an open question.     

Vapour phase hydrogenolysis of biomass‐derived diethyl succinate to tetrahydrofuran over CuO?ZnO/solid acid bifunctional catalysts

BACKGROUND: Catalytic upgrading of fermentation‐derived succinic acid or its derivates (succinic acid esters and succinic anhydride) to value added chemicals has received great attention recently. The aim of this work is to provide a process for the production of tetrahydrofuran from succinic acid esters. RESULTS: The hydrogenolysis of biomass‐derived diethyl succinate was investigated over CuO? ZnO and CuO? ZnO/solid acid (HY, HZSM‐5, SAPO‐11 and Al₂O₃) catalysts in a fixed‐bed reactor. Over CuO? ZnO, gamma‐butyrolactone and 1,4‐butanediol can be selectively produced under appropriate reaction conditions, while the selectivity of tetrahydrofuran is relatively low due to the weak acidity of CuO? ZnO. Over CuO? ZnO/HZSM, both the formed 1,4‐butanediol and ethanol can be further converted to tetrahydrofuran and diethyl ether, while tetrahydrofuran is selectively produced over CuO? ZnO/HY. CuO? ZnO/Al₂O₃ and CuO? ZnO/SAPO exhibit slight improvements in terms of selectivity to tetrahydrofuran when compared with CuO? ZnO. CONCLUSION: CuO? ZnO/HY is an appropriate catalyst to produce tetrahydrofuran from biomass‐derived diethyl succinate with high activity, selectivity and stability. Furthermore, Brønsted acid sites with appropriate acid strength are responsible for the selective formation of tetrahydrofuran under the applied reaction conditions. Copyright © 2010 Society of Chemical Industry     

Synergy at a distance in the synthesis of methanol over copper catalysts

Physical mixtures of Cu/SiO₂ and ZnO/SiO₂ catalysts have been studied for the synthesis of methanol from CO/CO₂/H₂ at 250 °C and 10 bar pressure. It is found that the activities are very much higher for the physical mixtures than would be expected from the activities of either of these two catalysts in isolation. The results suggest that the high activity of conventional Cu/ZnO/Al₂O₃ catalysts may arise from a synergy between the Cu and ZnO phases.     

Investigating the effect of metal oxide additives on the properties of Cu/ZnO/Al2O3 catalysts in methanol synthesis from syngas using factorial experimental design

The Cu/ZnO/Al₂O₃ catalysts, prepared by co-precipitation method, have been modified by adding small amount of Mn, Mg, Zr, Cr, Ba, W and Ce oxides using design of experiments (1/16 full factorial design). The structure and morphology of catalysts were studied by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and BET. Performance of the prepared catalysts for CO/CO₂ hydrogenation to methanol was evaluated by using a stainless steel fixed-bed reactor at 5 MPa and 513 K. The oxide additives were found to influence the catalytic activity, dispersion of Cu, Cu crystallite size, surface composition of catalyst and stability of catalysts during their operations. The results showed that the Mn and Zr promoted catalysts have high performance for methanol synthesis from syngas.     

Influence of preparation method on performance of Cu(Zn)(Zr)-alumina catalysts for the hydrogen production via steam reforming of methanol

The selective production of hydrogen via steam reforming of methanol (SRM) was performed using prepared catalysts at atmospheric pressure over a temperature range 200–260^∘C. Reverse water gas shift reaction and methanol decomposition reactions also take place simultaneously with the steam reforming reaction producing carbon monoxide which is highly poisonous to the platinum anode of PEM fuel cell, therefore the detailed study of effect of catalyst preparation method and of different promoters on SRM has been carried out for the minimization of carbon monoxide formation and maximization of hydrogen production. Wet impregnation and co-precipitation methods have been comparatively examined for the preparation of precursors to Cu(Zn)(Al₂O₃) and Cu(Zn)(Zr)(Al₂O₃). The catalyst preparation method affected the methanol conversion, hydrogen yield and carbon monoxide formation significantly. Incorporation of zirconia in Cu(Zn)(Al₂O₃) catalyst enhanced the catalytic activity, hydrogen selectivity and also lower the CO formation. Catalyst Cu(Zn)(Zr)(Al₂O₃) with composition Cu/Zn/Zr/Al:12/4/4/80 prepared by co-precipitation method was the most active catalyst giving methanol conversion up to 97% and CO concentration up to 400 ppm. Catalysts were characterized by atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS), Brunauer-Emett-Teller (BET) surface area, pore volume, pore size and X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD). The XRPD patterns revealed that the addition of zirconia improves the dispersion of copper which resulted in the better catalytic performance of Cu(Zn)(Zr)(Al₂O₃). The time-on-stream (TOS) catalysts stability test was also conducted for which the Cu(Zn)(Zr)(Al₂O₃) catalyst gave the consistent performance for a long time compared to other catalysts.     

Influence of preparation method on performance of Cu(Zn)(Zr)-alumina catalysts for the hydrogen production via steam reforming of methanol

The selective production of hydrogen via steam reforming of methanol (SRM) was performed using prepared catalysts at atmospheric pressure over a temperature range 200–260^°C. Reverse water gas shift reaction and methanol decomposition reactions also take place simultaneously with the steam reforming reaction producing carbon monoxide which is highly poisonous to the platinum anode of PEM fuel cell, therefore the detailed study of effect of catalyst preparation method and of different promoters on SRM has been carried out for the minimization of carbon monoxide formation and maximization of hydrogen production. Wet impregnation and co-precipitation methods have been comparatively examined for the preparation of precursors to Cu(Zn)(Al₂O₃) and Cu(Zn)(Zr)(Al₂O₃). The catalyst preparation method affected the methanol conversion, hydrogen yield and carbon monoxide formation significantly. Incorporation of zirconia in Cu(Zn)(Al₂O₃) catalyst enhanced the catalytic activity, hydrogen selectivity and also lower the CO formation. Catalyst Cu(Zn)(Zr)(Al₂O₃) with composition Cu/Zn/Zr/Al:12/4/4/80 prepared by co-precipitation method was the most active catalyst giving methanol conversion up to 97% and CO concentration up to 400 ppm. Catalysts were characterized by atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS), Brunauer-Emett-Teller (BET) surface area, pore volume, pore size and X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD). The XRPD patterns revealed that the addition of zirconia improves the dispersion of copper which resulted in the better catalytic performance of Cu(Zn)(Zr)(Al₂O₃). The time-on-stream (TOS) catalysts stability test was also conducted for which the Cu(Zn)(Zr)(Al₂O₃) catalyst gave the consistent performance for a long time compared to other catalysts.