Somatostatin receptor imaging of olfactory neuroblastoma

BACKGROUND: Cure of H. pylori infection in peptic ulcer patients significantly reduces the risk of ulcer recurrence. Since data on the rate of H. pylori reinfection in patients undergoing successful anti-H. pylori therapy are sparse, this study was conducted with the aim of determining the H. pylori reinfection rate in peptic ulcer patients receiving antibacterial treatment to heal their ulcer and cure H. pylori infection. METHODS: A total of 217 patients with H. pylori-associated duodenal or gastric ulcer were followed up after treatment with various antibacterial regimens resulting in histologically documented cure of H. pylori infection. Endoscopic and histological examinations were performed 4 weeks after completion of treatment and after 1, 2 and 5 years, or whenever dyspeptic symptoms occurred. To assess the H. pylori status two antral and two corpus biopsies were obtained for histological examination. RESULTS: Out of 217 patients with initially cured H. pylori infection 175 were available for endoscopic follow-up. At the time of analysis, 44 patients were re-examined after 1 year, 113 patients after 2 years and 18 patients after 5 years, giving a total of 360 patient years of follow-up. The mean duration of follow-up was 24.7 months. H. pylori reinfection was confirmed histologically in eight patients, three of whom becoming H. pylori-positive again within the first year of follow-up. Six of the eight patients with H. pylori reinfection also suffered an ulcer relapse. Eight cases of reinfection in 360 patient years represents an overall reinfection rate of 2.2%. Within the first 2 years of follow-up the reinfection rate was 0.8% per year. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that H. pylori reinfection is rare in peptic ulcer patients receiving successful anti-H. pylori therapy. H. pylori reinfection frequently coincides with ulcer recurrence. Cure of H. pylori infection results in cure of peptic ulcer disease, provided H. pylori reinfection does not occur.     

Animal model of human medulloblastoma: clinical, magnetic resonance imaging, and histopathological findings after intra-cisternal injection of MHH-MED-1 cells into nude rats

OBJECTIVES: It was our goal to evaluate the efficacy and safety and patient compliance with omeprazole-based dual and triple therapy for eradication of Helicobacter pylori in peptic ulcer disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred seventy-five consecutive patients with H. pylori infection and associated active peptic ulcer were included. H. pylori infection was assessed by rapid urease test and histological analysis. Patients were randomized among three treatments: group 1 (56 patients): omeprazole, 20 mg bid, and amoxicillin, 1 gm bid, for 2 weeks; group 2 (61 patients): omeprazole, 20 mg bid, plus amoxicillin, 1 gm bid, and metronidazole, 500 mg bid, for 1 week; and group 3 (58 patients): omeprazole, 20 mg bid, plus amoxicillin, 1 gm bid, and clarithromycin, 500 mg bid, for 1 week. Ulcer healing and cure of infection were evaluated at 4 to 6 weeks after cessation of therapy. Eradication rate was calculated per-protocol and by an intention-to-treat analysis. RESULTS: At posttreatment endoscopy, duodenal ulcer was healed in 98.3% of patients. Eleven patients (6%) were lost to follow-up. H. pylori infection was treated successfully in 55% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 41%-69%) of patients of group 1; 86% (95% CI = 77%-95%) of group 2 (p < .001 vs. group 1); and 93% (95% CI = 85%-100%) of group 3 (p < .001 vs. group 1). On intention-to-treat analysis, eradication was 52%, 80%, and 86% in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. A good compliance was observed in more than 90% of patients of all groups. Side effects were reported by 7% of patients in group 1, 9% in group 2, and 11% in group 3. None of the patients stopped therapy because of side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Dual-therapy omeprazole-amoxicillin for 2 weeks is associated with significantly lower eradication rate than is 1-week omeprazole-based triple therapies. Triple therapy is well-tolerated and produces side effects similar to those of dual therapy. The highest cure rate of H. pylori infection was achieved with triple therapy of omeprazole, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin for 1 week.     

Short-term low-dose pantoprazole-based triple therapy for cure of Helicobacter pylori infection in duodenal ulcer patients

BACKGROUND: The eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection has been achieved using various therapy regimens, but the efficacy of the proton-pump inhibitor pantoprazole as part of these regimens has not yet been widely tested. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a 1-week low-dose pantoprazole-based triple therapy in patients with H. pylori-positive duodenal ulcer. METHODS: In an open single-centre prospective study, 71 patients with endoscopically proven active duodenal ulcer and H. pylori infection received pantoprazole 40 mg o.m. for 4 weeks, and during the first week a combination antimicrobial treatment comprising tinidazole 500 mg b.d. plus clarithromycin 250 mg b.d. H. pylori eradication was defined as concordant negative histology and rapid urease test performed at endoscopy 4-6 weeks after the end of treatment, confirmed 4 weeks later by 13C-urea breath test. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients (93%) completed the trial and five patients were lost to follow-up. H. pylori infection was cured in 61 out of the 66 patients who completed the trial (per-protocol analysis: 92.4%, 95% CI: 83.2-97.5%; intention-to-treat analysis: 85.9%, 95% CI: 75.7-93.0%). At final endoscopy, 65 out of 66 patients had healed ulcer (98.5%). Mild adverse events occurred in six patients (9.1%). CONCLUSIONS: One-week low-dose pantoprazole-based triple therapy is a simple, effective and well-tolerated regimen for ulcer healing and H. pylori eradication in patients with duodenal ulcer.     

Amoxycillin resistance is one reason for failure of amoxycillin-omeprazole treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of omeprazole and amoxycillin dual therapy to treat Helicobacter pylori infection has been inconsistent, suggesting the presence of host or bacterial factors influencing treatment success. The aim of this study was to assess the role of pre-treatment amoxycillin resistance in the efficacy of omeprazole and amoxycillin dual therapy. METHODS: We studied 43 consecutive dyspeptic patients with H. pylori infection. Pre-treatment H. pylori infection was established by the combination of positive rapid urease test, culture and histology. Amoxycillin susceptibility testing was performed by an Epsilometer test (E-test) method and amoxycillin resistance was defined as minimum inhibitory concentration greater than 8 microg/mL. Patients received 20 mg omeprazole twice daily for 28 days and amoxycillin 1000 mg twice daily for 2 weeks. Adverse effects were documented using a questionnaire. H. pylori status was reassessed 6-8 weeks after the end of treatment by rapid urease testing and histological examination of gastric biopsies. RESULTS: Forty-two dyspeptic patients completed the study, and one patient dropped out. H. pylori infection was cured in 2 3 of 42 patients (55%). The cure rate was higher in patients harbouring amoxycillin-sensitive organisms than in those with resistant strains: 66% (19/29) vs. 31% (4/13), respectively (P = 0.049). No significant differences in cure rates were evident in relation to age, sex, smoking habits or compliance. CONCLUSIONS: The effectiveness of amoxycillin-omeprazole dual therapy was greatly reduced in the presence of pre-treatment amoxycillin-resistant H. pylori. The success rate in patients with amoxycillin-sensitive H. pylori was only 66%, suggesting the presence of additional factors affecting the efficacy of this therapy.     

One-week antibiotics versus maintenance acid suppression therapy for Helicobacter pylori-associated peptic ulcer bleeding

Bleeding peptic ulcer is the most important cause of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Our aim was to compare the effect of anti-Helicobacter therapy with maintenance treatment of H2-receptor antagonist in the prevention of relapses of ulcer and bleeding. Patients with bleeding duodenal or gastric ulcers and H. pylori infection were randomized to receive either a one-week course of triple therapy with bismuth subcitrate, metronidazole, and tetracycline plus ranitidine or a six-week course of ranitidine 300 mg/day. After the ulcers healed, the antibiotic-treated patients were not given any medication, whereas the ranitidine-treated patients continued to receive a maintenance dose of 150 mg/day. One hundred twenty-six patients were randomized to receive anti-Helicobacter therapy and 124 patients to receive long-term ranitidine. H. pylori eradication was achieved in 98.2% in those who received triple therapy and 6.1% in those who received ranitidine (P < 0.0001). At the six-week follow-up, ulcer healing was documented in 88.2% in those who received triple therapy and 86.1% in those who received ranitidine (P = 0.639). Recurrent ulcer developed in nine of the ranitidine-treated patients and three of them presented with recurrent upper gastrointestinal bleeding. One patient in the antibiotic group developed recurrent ulcer without rebleeding (P = 0.01). It is concluded that eradication of H. pylori is sufficient for the prevention of recurrent bleeding ulcers.     

New one-week, low-dose triple therapy for the treatment of duodenal ulcer with Helicobacter pylori infection

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial therapy is the recommended treatment for duodenal ulcer associated with Helicobacter pylori infection. The eradication of bismuth-based triple therapy with bismuth subcitrate, metronidazole and amoxicillin is limited by low compliance, drug resistance and side-effects. Two-week proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-based triple therapy has a higher eradication rate but is costly. This study was designed to compare the efficacy, patient compliance and cost of short-term PPI-based triple therapy with those of bismuth-based triple therapy. METHODS: Ninety patients with active duodenal ulcer disease and H pylori infection, proven with the 13C-urea breath test and CLO test (Campylobacter-like organism test) were treated randomly in three therapeutic groups: Group A, DeNol 120 mg, amoxicillin 500 mg and metronidazole 250 mg four times a day orally for 14 days; Group B, omeprazole 20 mg plus clarithromycin 500 mg twice a day and amoxicillin 500 mg four times a day for 14 days; Group C, omeprazole 20 mg, clarithromycin 250 mg and metronidazole 500 mg twice a day for seven days. Nizatidine 150 mg twice a day was given continuously following the end of anti-H pylori therapy for each group. Two months later, endoscopy, the CLO test and 13C-urea breath test were repeated to assess the eradication rate of H pylori and the ulcer-healing rate. Drug tolerance was evaluated by patients themselves by daily recording of any side-effects. RESULTS: Eighty-four patients completed the entire course of therapy and evaluation for H pylori infection. The H pylori eradication rates in Groups A, B and C were 75% (21/28), 93% (26/28) and 89% (25/28), respectively (p = 0.466). The ulcer healing rate was 86% (24/28) in Group A and 89% (25/28) in Groups B and C (p = 0.764). A total of 74 patients (88%) were free from symptoms at the end of the triple therapy. Symptom relief was faster in patients with PPI-based triple therapy (Groups B and C) (days 3 and 4) than for patients with bismuth-based triple therapy (day 5). The cost of Group C therapy was lower than that for Groups A and B. There were no major side-effects in any of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: One-week triple therapy with omeprazole, clarithromycin and metronidazole is highly effected for the eradication of H pylori. A therapeutic regime of one week's duration with lower cost, good compliance and mild side-effects may offer a good choice for treatment of duodenal ulcer associated with H pylori infection in clinical practice.     

Characterization of the active site of a hydrogen sensor from Alcaligenes eutrophus

BACKGROUND: The Maastricht Consensus Report advises that, in Helicobacter pylori-positive patients after surgery for peptic ulcer disease, H. pylori should be eradicated. The aim of the present study was to investigate the symptomatic response of H. pylori eradication in previously vagotomized peptic ulcer patients with persistent dyspeptic complaints. METHODS: The study was performed as a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Pretreatment diagnostic upper endoscopy was omitted. All the results were submitted to intention-to-treat and efficacy analyses. RESULTS: We could not find any differences between the two groups with regard to intensity or frequency of upper abdominal pain, nausea, heartburn, or other abdominal symptoms during the 12-month follow-up. The triple therapy eradication rate was 88% at both 3- and 12-month controls. CONCLUSION: Vagotomized peptic ulcer patients with persistent dyspeptic complaints should undergo a diagnostic upper endoscopy to detect ulcer recurrence before H. pylori eradication treatment is considered.     

Carbohydrate-deficient transferrin: marker of actual alcohol consumption or chronic alcohol misuse?

In this randomized, multicenter trial, we evaluated the effectiveness and side effect profile of a modified omeprazole-based triple therapy to cure Helicobacter pylori infection. The control group consisted of patients treated with standard dual therapy comprising omeprazole and amoxicillin. One hundred and fifty-seven H. pylori infected patients with duodenal ulcers were randomly assigned to receive either a combination of omeprazole 10 mg, clarithromycin 250 mg and metronidazole 400 mg (OCM) given three times daily for 10 days (n = 81), or a combination of omeprazole 20 mg and amoxicillin 1 g (OA) given twice daily for 14 days (n = 76). Prior to treatment and after 2 and 6 weeks, gastric biopsies from the antrum and corpus were obtained for histology and H. pylori culture. H. pylori infection was cured in 97.4% after OCM and in 65.8% after OA in the per-protocol analysis (p < 0.001) (intention-to-treat analysis: 93.4% and 63.2%, respectively). H. pylori was successfully cultured in 122 patients (77%). The overall rate of metronidazole resistance was 19.7% (24/122), no primary resistance to clarithromycin or amoxicillin was found. In the OCM group, all patients infected with metronidazole-sensitive H. pylori strains (n = 51) and those infected with strains of unknown susceptibility to metronidazole (n = 14) were cured (100%), while 77% (10/13) of those harboring metronidazole-resistant strains were cured of the infection (p = 0.36). Side effects leading to premature termination of treatment occurred in 2.5% of the patients in the OCM group and in 1.4% of the OA group. We conclude that combined treatment with omeprazole, clarithromycin and a higher dose of metronidazole is highly effective in curing H. pylori infection, and that this regimen remains very effective in the presence of metronidazole-resistant strains.     

Cost-effectiveness analysis of the eradication of Helicobacter pylori as treatment for duodenal ulcer

OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost-effectiveness of H. pylori eradication in patients with duodenal ulcer in Spain. METHODS: A decision model was used to compare the cost per cured patient and the cost per patient without recurrence in one year for four treatment strategies: 1) intermittent antisecretory therapy, 2) initial antisecretory therapy and H. pylori eradication if ulcer recurrence, 3) initial H. pylori eradication with antibiotics and antisecretory drugs, 4) antisecretory therapy followed by continuous maintenance therapy with ranitidine. Clinical variables were obtained from published studies made in Spain. RESULTS: Initial H. pylori eradication is the cheapest strategy (74,702-82,028 ptas per cured patient) and the most effective (83.3-85.2% patients without recurrence in one year). Intermittent antisecretory therapy is one of the most expensive (94,891-105,324 ptas per cured patient) and the less effective (12% patients without recurrence in one year). CONCLUSION: Initial eradication of H. pylori is the treatment of choice in patients with duodenal ulcer.     

One-week low-dose triple therapy vs. two-week medium-dose double therapy for H.pylori infection

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Our study is to compare a short-term low-dose triple therapy with a long-term medium-dose double therapy for H.pylori eradication. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and ten consecutive patients, suffering from dyspeptic symptoms, with H.pylori infection, were randomly allocated to one of the following 2 groups with different therapeutic regimens: A) omeprazole 20 mg/day for 7 days, tinidazole 500 mg bid for 7 days, clarithromycin 250 mg bid for 7 days (55 pts, 20 with peptic ulcer); B) omeprazole 20 mg bid for 14 days, amoxycillin 1000 mg bid for 14 days (55 pts, 28 with peptic ulcer). The "H.pylori status" was evaluated by means of histology, culture and urease test, at entry and 8 weeks after treatment. RESULTS: Two group A and one group B pts didn't complete the treatment. The H.pylori eradication was obtained in 38 pts of group A (71.69%) (C.I.95%: 55.19176-80.86293), in 31 of group B (58.49%) (C.I.95%: 42.32777-69.7017); on Intention-to-Treat analysis, the rate of eradication gave similar results. Side effects occurred in 9 pts of group A (16.98%), in 8 of group B (14.81%). CONCLUSIONS: Short-term low-dose triple therapy with omeprazole/tinidazole/clarithromycin has a better cost/benefit ratio than long-term dual therapy with omeprazole/amoxycillin in the H.pylori eradication, but it causes more side-effects.     

Helicobacter pylori infection and duodenal ulcer in children and adolescents

To investigate the relationship between H. pylori infection and duodenal ulcer in children and adolescents, the markers of H. pylori infection were studied in 22 children and adolescents who had duodenal ulcers and were followed prospectively (Group A). Another 36 patients with gastrointestinal symptoms, but without ulcer, were also studied for comparison (Group B). Antral and duodenal tissues were biopsied and analyzed for the presence of H. pylori using three standard methods: urease test, culture and histology. The specific IgG antibody against H. pylori positivity using the ELISA method were also analysed. By these three methods, H. pylori positivity in the antral tissues, chronic active antral gastritis, and seroprevalence rate were found to be much higher in Group A than Group B. However, a similar trend was not found in the duodenal tissues. H. pylori was found in four of five patients during postoperative follow-up for duodenal ulcer. Among the four patients, no duodenal ulcer but chronic active gastritis was detected endoscopically in three who received vagotomy. Only the one who received simple closure of the perforated duodenal ulcer had a recurrent duodenal ulcer. It was concluded that a close relationship among duodenal ulcer, chronic active gastritis and H. pylori is present in children and adolescents.     

Has the impact of Helicobacter pylori therapy on ulcer recurrence in the United States been overstated? A meta-analysis of rigorously designed trials

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the effect of H. pylori eradication on ulcer recurrence in North American duodenal ulcer patients by examining only treatment studies that met rigorous methodologic criteria. METHODS: Data sources were computerized bibliographic searches from 1983, review of reference lists, communication with companies that manufacture medications used for H. pylori therapy in the U.S., and H. pylori investigators, review of open presentations to the Food and Drug Administration, and review of abstracts from annual scientific meetings. Criteria for study inclusion were double blind, randomized North American trials of H. pylori therapy for duodenal ulcer, scheduled endoscopic follow-up exams for > or = 6 months, and H. pylori cure documented > or = 4 wk after completion of therapy by at least two endoscopic biopsy tests. Seven relevant trials were identified. Data were abstracted independently and disagreement was resolved by consensus. We obtained missing data and identified erroneous assessments through contact with an author or sponsor of all studies. RESULTS: The common odds ratio for ulcer recurrence was 0.20 (95% CI, 0.13-0.31) and 2.8 patients would need to be successfully treated to prevent one ulcer recurrence at 6 months. The pooled ulcer recurrence rate at 6 months in patients with H. pylori eradication was 20%. CONCLUSION: Results of North American studies of highest methodological quality confirm that H. pylori eradication markedly decreases ulcer recurrence. Nevertheless, 20% of patients in these studies had ulcer recurrence within 6 months, despite successful cure of infection and no reported use of NSAIDs. Non-H. pylori, non-NSAID ulcers may be more common in the U.S. than previously believed.     

Randomised trial of eradication of Helicobacter pylori before non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug therapy to prevent peptic ulcers

BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori infection is common in patients with peptic ulcers caused by the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). But the pathogenic role of H pylori in this disease is controversial. We studied the efficacy of eradication of H pylori in the prevention of NSAID-induced peptic ulcers. METHODS: We recruited patients with musculoskeletal pain who required NSAID treatment. None of the patients had previous exposure to NSAID therapy. Patients who had H pylori infection but no pre-existing ulcers on endoscopy were randomly allocated naproxen alone (750 mg daily) for 8 weeks or a 1-week course of triple therapy (bismuth subcitrate 120 mg, tetracycline 500 mg, metronidazole 400 mg, each given orally four times daily) before administration of naproxen (750 mg daily). Endoscopy was repeated after 8 weeks of naproxen treatment or when naproxen treatment was stopped early because of bleeding or intractable dyspepsia. All endoscopic examinations were done by one endoscopist who was unaware of treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was the cumulative rate of gastric and duodenal ulcers. FINDINGS: 202 patients underwent endoscopic screening for enrolment in the trial, and 100 eligible patients were randomly assigned treatment. 92 patients completed the trial (47 in the naproxen group, 45 in the triple-therapy group). At 8 weeks, H pylori had been eradicated from no patients in the naproxen group and 40 (89%) in the triple-therapy group (p < 0.001). 12 (26%) naproxen-group patients developed ulcers: five had ulcer pain and one developed ulcer bleeding. Only three (7%) patients on triple therapy had ulcers, and two of these patients had failure of H pylori eradication (p = 0.01). Thus, 12 (26%) patients with persistent H pylori infection but only one (3%) with successful H pylori eradication developed ulcers with naproxen (p = 0.002). INTERPRETATION: Eradication of H pylori before NSAID therapy reduces the occurrence of NSAID-induced peptic ulcers.     

One-week use of ranitidine bismuth citrate, amoxycillin and clarithromycin for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori-related duodenal ulcer

BACKGROUND: Proton pump inhibitors have been widely used in combination with amoxycillin, clarithromycin or metronidazole for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection. AIM: To study the effects of 1-week ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC)-based triple therapy in the treatment of H. pylori-related duodenal ulcers. METHOD: Patients with duodenal ulcers and H. pylori infection were prospectively randomized to receive either RBC with amoxycillin and clarithromycin for 1 week (RAC), or omeprazole with amoxycillin and clarithromycin for 1 week (OAC). No additional ulcer healing drug was used after the 1-week medication. Patients were assessed for H. pylori eradication, ulcer healing and side-effects after receiving the therapies. RESULTS: One hundred consecutive patients were recruited to this study, with 50 patients randomized to each treatment group. In the intention-to-treat analysis, duodenal ulcers were completely healed in 45 (90%) patients in the RAC group and 43 (89.6%) in the OAC group (P = 1.0). H. pylori eradication was confirmed in 47 (94%) in the RAC group and 42 (87.5%) in the OAC group (P = 0.31). There was no significant difference in the severity of side-effects experienced by the two treatment groups. CONCLUSION: One-week RBC-based triple therapy is an effective treatment for H. pylori-related duodenal ulcers. The therapeutic effects are comparable to a 1-week course of proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapy.     

Comparative effect of lansoprazole/amoxicillin with omeprazole/amoxicillin for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori in patients with duodenal ulcer

Lansoprazole, a potent antisecretory drug, possesses on an equimolar basis a 4-fold higher in vitro anti-Helicobacter pylori activity than omeprazole. In a prospective randomized study we compared lansoprazole 30 mg b.i.d. and amoxicillin 1 g b.i.d. with omeprazole 40 mg b.i.d. and amoxicillin 1 g b.i.d. for 14 days followed by lansoprazole 30 mg q.d. or omeprazole 20 mg q.d. for 14 additional days in 50 H. pylori positive duodenal ulcer patients (14f, 36m, age 27-83 [mean 43] years). H. pylori infection was diagnosed by histology (3 antral biopsies and 2 from gastric body, H & E- and Giemsa stain), rapid urease test (CLO) and culture in 39 patients, or by histology and rapid urease test in 11 patients. Control endoscopy was performed 4-6 weeks after the end of treatment. For eradication, a negative result in all 3 diagnostic modalities was required. The eradication rate was 43% (9/21 patients) in both treatment groups. 8 patients were lost to follow-up. The ulcer healing rate was 100% in both groups. Nonsmokers had a significantly higher (p = 0.026) eradication rate than smokers. No relevant adverse effects of the therapy occurred. 24 patients with persistent H. pylori infection were subsequently treated with lansoprazole 60 mg b.i.d. and amoxicillin 1 g b.i.d. for 14 days. Eradication was achieved in 5/22 (23%) patients (3/14 smokers, 2/8 nonsmokers), while 2 patients were lost to follow-up. 17 patients with persistent H. pylori infection after the second treatment received quadruple therapy consisting of metronidazole 500 mg t.i.d., tetracycline 500 mg q.i.d. bismuth-subcitrate 120 mg q.i.d. and lansoprazole 30 mg for 10 days. H. pylori eradication was achieved in 12/15 patients (80%). In conclusion, lansoprazole plus amoxicillin was equal to omeprazole plus amoxicillin in the treatment of H. pylori infected duodenal ulcer patients. Patients with eradication failure after dual therapy were successfully treated by quadruple therapy. In contrast, high dose lansoprazole and amoxicillin therapy was effective in only 23% of patients with persistent infection after standard dual therapy.     

Role of Helicobacter pylori in reflux esophagitis

It is now widely accepted that peptic ulcer disease (PUD) is a result of chronic infection of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori). Thus, treatment of PUD should be aimed toward eradication of H. pylori with antibiotics. One the other hand, recent study from England suggested that eradication of H. pylori may provoke development of reflux esophagitis in duodenal ulcer patients. Despite duodenall ulcer patients with concomitant esophagitis is a specific type of esophagitis, it is important to recognize the development of reflux esophagitis after cure of H. pylori infection. Whether the development of reflux esophagitis is occurred in other H. pylori-related disease such as gastric ulcer remains to be studied.     

CT in Fournier''s gangrene

BACKGROUND: Few outcome studies directly compare Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy with maintenance H2-antagonist therapy in duodenal ulcer disease. AIM: To examine prospectively the efficacy of H. pylori eradication therapy with ranitidine maintenance therapy over 1 year in patients with confirmed chronic duodenal ulcer. METHODS: One hundred and nineteen patients with active H. pylori infection were randomized to receive ranitidine, 150 mg/day initially (58 patients), or omeprazole, 40 mg/day, amoxycillin 2 g/day and metronidazole 1.2 g/day for 14 days, or omeprazole 40 mg/day and clarithromycin 1.5 g/day, for 14 days (if penicillin-allergic). Symptoms were assessed using the Gastrointestinal System Rating Scale (GSRS) and SF36 quality of life index. RESULTS: 13C urea breath testing confirmed overall treatment success in 100% of patients (58/58) per protocol and 95.1% (58/61) on an intention-to-treat basis. At 4 and 12 months there were no differences in any GSRS symptoms between treatment groups. SF36 analysis showed a perceived health improvement at 4 and 12 months in patients who received H. pylori eradication. However, despite successful H. pylori eradication, one-fifth of patients still required antisecretory therapy. CONCLUSION: Following successful H. pylori eradication, chronic duodenal ulcer patients were at least as well symptomatically as when taking maintenance ranitidine. They perceived that their health had improved, but a subgroup was still acid-suppression dependent.     

Peptic ulcer in Greenland Inuit: evidence for a low prevalence of duodenal ulcer

In an eight years period new peptic ulcer was diagnosed in 127 Inuit patients at the Central Hospital, Dronning Ingrids Hospital, Nuuk/Godth?b. The ratios: duodenal ulcers (DU): prepyloric ulcers (PPU): gastric ulcers (GU) were 17:22:88. The male:female ratio was 2:1. 46 of the patients were living permanently in Nuuk, 81 in The Districts. There were no significant differences in the type of ulcers among the two groups. The incidence of GU among the Nuuk population was comparable to the incidence in the Danish population (0.63/1000 inhabitants per year), whereas the mean age at the time of diagnosis was only 45 years, thus the patients were approximately 15 years younger than the Danish counterparts. The incidence of DU among the Inuits was 0.15/1000 inhabitants per year, significantly less than in the Danish population. The frequency of Helicobacter (H.) pylori infection among 56 Inuits with dyspeptic symptoms was: 0.61. Only 6/12 patients suffering from DU had a positive test for H. pylori infection. Conclusions: The incidence of duodenal ulcers in the Inuit population was only 10% of the incidence in a Danish population, whereas the incidence of gastric ulcers among the Inuits was comparable to the incidence among Danes. Only 50% of Inuit patients with proven DU had a positive test for H. pylori infection, whereas the frequency of H.pylori infection in a population with dyspeptic symptoms corresponded very well to the frequency reported from other populations.     

Evaluation of a new ultrashort triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori disease

BACKGROUND: 1-week proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapies are considered the most effective and convenient drug combinations for curing Helicobacter pylori infection. Short therapies, lasting less than 1 week have been investigated rarely. AIM: To assess the efficacy and tolerability of a 3-day lansoprazole triple therapy after 1 day of lansoprazole pre-treatment. METHODS: Seventy H. pylori-positive (rapid urease test and histology) patients received LAzT3 regimen (lanzoprazole 30 mg b.d. and azithromycin 500 mg o.m. for 3 days; tinidazole 2000 mg o.m. on day 1 and 1000 mg o.m. on days 2-3) after 1 day of lansoprazole pretreatment. Patients with active ulcer received lansoprazole 30 mg o.m. for an additional 4 weeks. Follow-up gastroscopy was carried out 4-6 weeks after completion of therapy. Eradication was defined as negative histology and rapid urease test. RESULTS: Four patients failed to attend the follow-up endoscopy. One patient complained of minor side-effects. H. pylori was eradicated in 57 of 66 patients suitable for evaluation, with a per-protocol cure rate of 86.3% (95%CI: 76-94%), and an intention-to-treat cure rate of 81.4% (95%CI: 70-90%). CONCLUSIONS: This new ultrashort triple therapy including lansoprazole, azithromycin and tinidazole seems to be effective in eradicating H. pylori. It is safe and well-tolerated, and may be taken into consideration as a valid alternative to the better known and widely used 1-week proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapies.     

A comparison of 10 and 14 days of lansoprazole triple therapy for eradication of Helicobacter pylori

BACKGROUND: Data from large, multicenter, US studies determining the efficacy of triple therapy for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori are lacking, especially for a treatment duration of less than 14 days. METHODS: Patients with H pylori infection and active duodenal ulcer disease or a history of duodenal ulcer disease within the past year were randomized to receive 30 mg of lansoprazole, 1 g of amoxicillin, and 500 mg of clarithromycin twice daily for 10 or 14 days. The primary efficacy end point was the eradication of H pylori as confirmed by negative histological and culture results at 4 to 6 weeks after the completion of treatment. RESULTS: Of 284 patients enrolled in the study from 46 US sites, 236 met the entry criteria. At 4 to 6 weeks after the end of therapy, H pylori was eradicated in 85% (96/ 113) of the patients receiving 14-day triple therapy and in 84% (103/123) of those receiving 10-day triple therapy by per-protocol analysis (95% confidence interval for treatment group differences, -10.5 to 8.1; P>.05). There was also no significant difference between the 14- and 10-day treatment groups when analyzed by an intent-to-treat analysis of H pylori eradication. A similar proportion of patients in each treatment group reported an adverse event related to therapy (34% [46/136] vs 38% [56/148], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with an active or a recent history of duodenal ulcer, lansoprazole-based triple therapy for 10 or 14 days is highly effective in the eradication of H pylori. The duration of therapy may be reduced from 14 to 10 days without a significant effect on regimen efficacy.