Coronary angioplasty versus repeat coronary artery bypass grafting for patients with previous bypass surgery

OBJECTIVES: We attempted to determine the relative risks and benefits of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and repeat coronary artery bypass grafting (re-CABG) in patients with previous coronary bypass surgery (CABG). BACKGROUND: Due to an expanding population of patients with surgically treated coronary artery disease and the natural progression of atherosclerosis, an increasing number of patients with previous CABG require repeat revascularization procedures. Although there are randomized comparative data for CABG versus medical therapy and, more recently, versus PTCA, these studies have excluded patients with previous CABG. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from 632 patients with previous CABG who required either elective re-CABG (n = 164) or PTCA (n = 468) at a single center during 1987 through 1988. The PTCA and re-CABG groups were similar with respect to gender (83% vs. 85% male), age > 70 years (21% vs. 23%), mean left ventricular ejection fraction (46% vs. 48%), presence of class III or IV angina (70% vs. 63%) and three-vessel coronary artery disease (77% vs. 74%). RESULTS: Complete revascularization was achieved in 38% of patients with PTCA and 92% of those with re-CABG (p < 0.0001). The in-hospital complication rates were significantly lower in the PTCA group: death (0.3% vs. 7.3%, p < 0.0001) and Q wave myocardial infarction (MI) (0.9% vs. 6.1%, p < 0.0001). Actuarial survival was equivalent at 1 year (PTCA 95% vs. re-CABG 91%) and 6 years (PTCA 74% vs. re-CABG 73%) of follow-up (p = 0.32). Both procedures resulted in equivalent event-free survival (freedom from dealth or Q wave MI) and relief of angina; however, the need for repeat percutaneous or surgical revascularization, or both, by 6 years was significantly higher in the PTCA group (PTCA 64% vs. re-CABG 8%, p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis identified age > 70 years, left ventricular ejection fraction < 40%, unstable angina, number of diseased vessels and diabetes mellitus as independent correlates of mortality for the entire group. CONCLUSIONS: In this nonrandomized series of patients with previous CABG requiring revascularization, an initial stategy of either PTCA or re-CABG resulted in equivalent overall survival, event-free survival and relief of angina. PTCA offers lower procedural morbidity and mortality risks, although it is associated with less complete revascularization and a greater need for subsequent revascularization procedures.     

Impact of diabetes mellitus on percutaneous revascularization (CAVEAT-I). CAVEAT-I Investigators. Coronary Angioplasty Versus Excisional Atherectomy Trial

We examined the relation between diabetes mellitus and outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularization in the Coronary Angioplasty Versus Excisional Atherectomy Trial (CAVEAT-I), a randomized trial comparing treatment with either percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty or directional atherectomy for de novo lesions in native coronary arteries. Acute success and complication rates, 6-month angiographic restenosis rates, and 1-year clinical outcomes were compared between diabetic and nondiabetic patients undergoing each procedure. Acute success rates between diabetic (n = 191) and nondiabetic (n = 821) patients were similar for both revascularization techniques. Except for the need for dialysis, complication rates were also similar. Six months after atherectomy, diabetic patients had significantly more angiographic restenosis than nondiabetics (59.7% vs 47.4%) and significantly smaller minimum luminal diameters (1.20 vs 1.40 mm). Diabetics undergoing atherectomy required more frequent bypass surgery (12.8% vs 8.5%) and more repeat percutaneous revascularizations (36.5% vs 28.1%) than nondiabetics undergoing atherectomy. Restenosis rates, minimum luminal diameters and repeat revascularizations between diabetics and nondiabetics undergoing angioplasty were similar. The higher restenosis and repeat revascularization rates and the smaller minimum luminal diameter at follow-up in diabetic patients suggest that atherectomy may provide only modest benefit for these patients. The increased restenosis rate in diabetics undergoing atherectomy (but not angioplasty) requires further evaluation.     

Revascularization in patients with prior coronary bypass surgery

Increasingly over the past several years, patients have returned after coronary surgery for reintervention procedures. This reflects immediate postsurgical complications and the relentless progression of coronary artery disease in the native circulation and in the bypass grafts. Although there are randomized comparative data for coronary bypass surgery (CABG) versus percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and medical therapy, these trials have always excluded patients with previous (GABG). OBJECTIVES: We attempted to compare the risks and benefits of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and repeat coronary artery bypass grafting (re-CABG) in patients with previous coronary bypass surgery (CABG). METHODS AND RESULTS: This study examines follow up data (15.4 +/- 11.0 months) from 130 patients with previous CABG, who required either PTCA (Group A, n = 73) or re-CABG (Group B; n = 57) at a single center from 1994 to 1997. Follow up data were obtained from subsequent office visits and telephone calls. The PTCA and re-CABG groups were similar with respect to gender (86% vs 94% males), mean age (62 +/- 9 vs 59 +/- 10 years), angina CCS classes 3 and 4 (73% vs 69%), diminished left ventricular function (23% vs 26%), risk factors such as diabetes (19% vs 17%), hypercolesterolemia (49% vs 45%) and smoking (48% vs 39%) and three-vessel native coronary artery disease (67% vs 72%). The symptomatic status prior to the revascularization procedure was similar in both groups. Complete and functional revascularization was achieved in 85% of the PTCA group and in 92% of those with re-CABG (p = NS). During the hospital stay the complication rates were lower in the PTCA group. Actuarial survival was different at follow up (p = 0.04). Both PTCA and re-CABG groups resulted in equivalent event-free survival (freedom from death, myocardial infarction, unstable angina and urgent revascularization). The need for repeat revascularization at follow up was significantly higher in the PTCA group (PTCA 28% vs re-CABG 10%, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In this non-randomized study of patients with previous CABG requiring revascularization procedures, PTCA resulted in lower procedural morbidity and mortality risks. At follow up, both PTCA or CABG were similar for event-free survival; PTCA offered lower overall mortality, although it is associated to a greater need for subsequent revascularization procedures.     

Coronary revascularization in diabetic patients: a comparison of the randomized and observational components of the Aypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI)

BACKGROUND: Patients with treated diabetes in the randomized-trial segment of the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) who were randomized to initial revascularization with PTCA had significantly worse 5-year survival than patients assigned to CABG. This treatment difference was not seen among diabetic patients eligible for BARI who opted to select their mode of revascularization. We hypothesized that differences in patient characteristics, assessed and unmeasured, together with the treatment selection in the registry, at least partially account for this discrepancy. METHODS AND RESULTS: Among diabetics taking insulin or oral hypoglycemic drugs at entry, angiographic and clinical presentations were comparable between randomized and registry patients. However, more registry patients were white, and registry diabetics tended to be more educated and more physically active and to report better quality of life. Procedural characteristics and in-hospital complications were comparable. The 5-year all-cause mortality rate was 34.5% in randomized diabetic patients assigned to PTCA versus 19.4% in CABG patients (P=0.0024; relative risk [RR]=1.87); corresponding cardiac mortality rates were 23.4% and 8.2%, respectively (P=0.0002; RR=3.10). The CABG benefit was more apparent among patients requiring insulin. In the registry, all-cause mortality was 14.4% for PTCA versus 14.9% for CABG (P=0.86, RR=1.10), with corresponding cardiac mortality rates of 7.5% and 6. 0%, respectively (P=0.73; RR=1.07). These RRs in the registry increased to 1.29 and 1.41, respectively, after adjustment for all known differences between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: BARI registry results are not inconsistent with the finding in the randomized trial that initial CABG is associated with better long-term survival than PTCA in treated diabetic patients with multivessel coronary disease suitable for either surgical or catheter-based revascularization.     

Optimal coronary balloon angioplasty with provisional stenting versus primary stent (OCBAS): immediate and long-term follow-up results

OBJECTIVE: This study sought to compare two strategies of revascularization in patients obtaining a good immediate angiographic result after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA): elective stenting versus optimal PTCA. A good immediate angiographic result with provisional stenting was considered to occur only if early loss in minimal luminal diameter (MLD) was documented at 30 min post-PTCA angiography. BACKGROUND: Coronary stenting reduces restenosis in lesions exhibiting early deterioration (>0.3 mm) in MLD within the first 24 hours (early loss) after successful PTCA. Lesions with no early loss after PTCA have a low restenosis rate. METHODS: To compare angiographic restenosis and target vessel revascularization (TVR) of lesions treated with coronary stenting versus those treated with optimal PTCA, 116 patients were randomized to stent (n=57) or to optimal PTCA (n=59). After randomization in the PTCA group, 13.5% of the patients crossed over to stent due to early loss (provisional stenting). RESULTS: Baseline demographic and angiographic characteristics were similar in both groups of patients. At 7.6 months, 96.6% of the entire population had a follow-up angiographic study: 98.2% in the stent and 94.9% in the PTCA group. Immediate and follow-up angiographic data showed that acute gain was significantly higher in the stent than in the PTCA group (1.95 vs. 1.5 mm; p < 0.03). However, late loss was significantly higher in the stent than the PTCA group (0.63+/-0.59 vs. 0.26+/-0.44, respectively; p=0.01). Hence, net gain with both techniques was similar (1.32< or =0.3 vs. 1.24+/-0.29 mm for the stent and the PTCA groups, respectively; p=NS). Angiographic restenosis rate at follow-up (19.2% in stent vs. 16.4% in PTCA; p=NS) and TVR (17.5% in stent vs. 13.5% in PTCA; p=NS) were similar. Furthermore, event-free survival was 80.8% in the stent versus 83.1% in the PTCA group (p=NS). Overall costs (hospital and follow-up) were US $591,740 in the stent versus US $398,480 in the PTCA group (p < 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The strategy of PTCA with delay angiogram and provisional stent if early loss occurs had similar restenosis rate and TVR, but lower cost than primary stenting after PTCA.     

Late results of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty of two or more major native coronary arteries

Of 613 consecutive patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing revascularization, 521 patients (85%) underwent primary management with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). To examine long-term outcome in a series of patients often referred for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery, all patients undergoing multivessel dilations were identified for late follow-up analysis (n = 161). Mean age was 65 years; 54 patients (34%) were women. Four hundred fifty-five of 502 lesions (90.6%) were successfully dilated. Major in-hospital procedural complications occurred in 6 patients (3.7%), including death in 3 (1.9%), nonfatal Q-wave myocardial infarction in 2 (1.2%), and CABG in 1 (0.6%). Final follow-up data were available in 159 patients (99%) at a mean of 39 +/- 18 months. Including in-hospital events, actuarial 3-year survival was 93%, and 3-year infarct-free survival was 90%. At final follow-up, 143 of 146 patients alive (98%) were angina free. Crossover to CABG was required in 25 patients (16%). Repeat PTCA was performed in 67 patients (42%) (mean 1.7 PTCAs/patient, range 1 to 7). PTCA is an effective therapeutic alternative in the management of most patients with multivessel CAD requiring revascularization. A strategy using multiple repeated PTCA procedures when necessary results in prolonged infarct-free survival, with long-term freedom from angina and limited crossover to CABG.     

Long-term results of RITA-1 trial: clinical and cost comparisons of coronary angioplasty and coronary-artery bypass grafting. Randomised Intervention Treatment of Angina

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) are both effective intervention strategies for patients with coronary heart disease. We report comparative long-term clinical and health-service cost findings for these interventions in the first Randomised Intervention Treatment of Angina (RITA-1) trial. METHODS: 1011 patients with coronary heart disease (45% single-vessel, 55% multivessel) were randomly assigned initial treatment strategies of PTCA or CABG. Information on clinical events, subsequent intervention, symptomatic status, exercise testing, and use of health-care resources is available for a median 6.5 years of follow-up. Analyses were by intention to treat. FINDINGS: The predefined primary endpoint of death or nonfatal myocardial infarction occurred in 87 (17%) PTCA-group patients and 80 (16%) CABG-group patients (p=0.64). Similarly, there was no significant treatment difference in deaths alone (39 PTCA, 45 CABG), of which 46% were cardiac related. In both groups, the risk of cardiac death or myocardial infarction was more than five times higher in the first year than in subsequent years of follow-up. 26% of patients assigned PTCA subsequently also had CABG, and a further 19% required additional nonrandomised PTCA. Most of these reinterventions occurred within a year of randomisation, and from 3 years onwards the reintervention rate averaged 4% per year. In the CABG group the reintervention rate averaged 2% per year. The prevalence of angina was consistently higher in the PTCA group, with an absolute average 10% excess compared with the CABG group (p<0.001). Total health-service costs over 5 years showed no significant difference between initial strategies of PTCA and CABG (mean difference pounds sterling 426 [95% Cl -pounds sterling 383 to pounds sterling 1235]; p=0.30). The clinical and cost comparisons showed similar patterns for patients with single-vessel and multivessel disease. INTERPRETATION: Initial strategies of PTCA and CABG led to similar long-term results in terms of survival and avoidance of myocardial infarction and to similar long-term health-care costs. Choice of approach, therefore, rests on weighing the more invasive nature of CABG against the greater risk of recurrent angina and reintervention over many years after PTCA.     

Myocardial revascularisation in elderly patients with refractory or unstable angina and advanced coronary disease

BACKGROUND: Elderly patients with ischaemic heart disease are often treated more conservatively and for longer than younger patients, but this strategy may result in subsequent invasive intervention of more advanced and higher risk coronary disease. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 109 patients aged > or = 70 years (mean age 74 years, 66% men), who presented with angina refractory to maximal medical treatment or unstable angina over a 2-year period (1988-1990), to compare the relative risks and benefits of myocardial revascularisation [coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA)] in this higher-risk age group. RESULTS: Sixty patients underwent CABG and 49 patients PTCA. There were eight periprocedural deaths in total (six in the CABG group, and two in the PTCA group, P = 0.29). Six patients in the CABG group suffered a cerebrovascular accident (two fatal). Acute Q-wave myocardial infarction occurred in one patient in the CABG group and in two patients in the PTCA group. The length of hospital stay was longer for the CABG group (CABG group 11.4 +/- 5.4 days, range 7-30 days, PTCA group 7.4 +/- 7.6 days, range 1-39 days, P = 0.01). Outcome was assessed using the major cardiac event rate (MACE; i.e. the rate of death, myocardial infarction, repeat CABG or PTCA). The cumulative event-free survival in the CABG group in 1, 2 and 3 years was 87, 85 and 85%, respectively. In contrast, in the PTCA group it was 55, 48 and 48% (P = 0.0001). Age, sex, number of diseased vessels, degree of revascularisation and left ventricular function were not predictive of the recurrence of angina in both groups. Actuarial survival (total mortality, including perioperative mortality) was lower at 1 year in the CABG group due to the higher perioperative mortality, but similar in both groups after the second year (P = 0.62). CONCLUSIONS: Elderly patients with refractory or unstable angina who are revascularised surgically have a better long-term outcome (less frequent event rate of the composite end-point--myocardial infarction, revascularisation procedures and death) compared with those who are revascularised with PTCA. This benefit is been realised after the second year. Total mortality is similar in both groups after the second year. Therefore elderly patients who are fit for surgery should not be denied the benefits of CABG. PTCA may be regarded as a complementary and satisfactory treatment, especially for those whose life expectancy is limited to less than 2 years. The use of stents may improve outcome in the PTCA group and this needs to be evaluated.     

Cardiovascular events and their reduction with pravastatin in diabetic and glucose-intolerant myocardial infarction survivors with average cholesterol levels: subgroup analyses in the cholesterol and recurrent events (CARE) trial. The Care Investigators

BACKGROUND: Although diabetes is a major risk factor for coronary heart disease (CHD), little information is available on the effects of lipid lowering in diabetic patients. We determined whether lipid-lowering treatment with pravastatin prevents recurrent cardiovascular events in diabetic patients with CHD and average cholesterol levels. METHODS AND RESULTS: The Cholesterol And Recurrent Events (CARE) trial, a 5-year trial that compared the effect of pravastatin and placebo, included 586 patients (14.1%) with clinical diagnoses of diabetes. The participants with diabetes were older, more obese, and more hypertensive. The mean baseline lipid concentrations in the group with diabetes--136 mg/dL LDL cholesterol, 38 mg/dL HDL cholesterol, and 164 mg/dL triglycerides--were similar to those in the nondiabetic group. LDL cholesterol reduction by pravastatin was similar (27% and 28%) in the diabetic and nondiabetic groups, respectively. In the placebo group, the diabetic patients suffered more recurrent coronary events (CHD death, nonfatal myocardial infarction [MI], CABG, and PTCA) than did the nondiabetic patients (37% versus 25%). Pravastatin treatment reduced the absolute risk of coronary events for the diabetic and nondiabetic patients by 8.1% and 5.2% and the relative risk by 25% (P=0.05) and 23% (P<0.001), respectively. Pravastatin reduced the relative risk for revascularization procedures by 32% (P=0.04) in the diabetic patients. In the 3553 patients who were not diagnosed as diabetic, 342 had impaired fasting glucose at entry defined by the American Diabetes Association as 110 to 125 mg/dL. These nondiabetic patients with impaired fasting glucose had a higher rate of recurrent coronary events than those with normal fasting glucose (eg, 13% versus 10% for nonfatal MI). Recurrence rates tended to be lower in the pravastatin compared with placebo group (eg, -50%, P=0.05 for nonfatal MI). CONCLUSIONS: Diabetic patients and nondiabetic patients with impaired fasting glucose are at high risk of recurrent coronary events that can be substantially reduced by pravastatin treatment.     

Heart transplantation in patients with diabetic end-organ damage before transplantation

Diabetes mellitus with preexisting end-organ damage (EOD) is considered a contraindication for heart transplantation. The outcome of such patients has not been well characterized. Among 138 patients transplanted between 12/88 and 7/94, 29 were diabetic (11 insulin-dependent); of these, 12 had preexisting EOD, defined as a creatinine clearance < or = 50 ml/min, a 24-hour urine protein concentration > or = 500 mg/L or typical symptoms of peripheral or autonomic polyneuropathy, and 17 had no EOD. We compared diabetics with and without EOD and non-diabetics (n = 109) for operative mortality, length of stay, serum creatinine, fasting glucose levels, and postoperative prednisone doses at 1,6, and 12 months. Actuarial survival and freedom from rejection and infection were analyzed. Both diabetic groups were significantly older than nondiabetics, Ischemic time, operative mortality, surgical technique, ICU- and total length of stay were similar. Actuarial survival and freedom from rejection were similar among the three groups. Infection rates including CMV did not differ. Serum creatinine levels increased in all groups compared to pretransplant levels (p = 0.001), but without significant differences among the groups. Post-transplant glucose levels at 6 and 12 months were higher for diabetic patients with EOD than for those without or for nondiabetics (183, 153, and 94 mg/dl at 6 months, p = 0.01; 202, 161, and 102 mg/dl at 12 months, p = 0.0001). Prednisone dosage was lower in diabetics with EOD at 6 months, but did not differ among the three groups at 12 months. The incidence of angiographically proven transplant vasculopathy did not differ at 1 and 2 years. Diabetics with preexisting EOD undergoing heart transplantation experience similar short- and intermediate-term results when compared to diabetics without EOD and nondiabetics. Metabolic control is more difficult to achieve, as indicated by higher fasting glucose levels. Larger and longer-term prospective studies have to confirm our findings, since the shortage of donor organs would increase if such patients were transplanted routinely.     

Evaluation of indications for PTCA

Rating the indications for invasive cardiac procedures often is regarded as one key method for quality assessment in cardiology. The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity of the method proposed by the RAND Corporation and the University of California, Los Angeles, appropriateness and necessity rating. Two hypotheses were tested: 1. The acute and long-term benefit of PTCA is less clearly in cases rated "uncertain" than in cases rated "appropriate" or "necessary", and 2. in cases rated "necessary", successful PTCA improves the patients long-term prognosis, since RAND's definition of "necessary" implies that a successful PTCA will avert major harm from this patient. PATIENTS: Five hundred and one consecutive patients dilated between 1981 and 1984 were included. Baseline data: Age 52.5 +/- 8.2 years, male gender 87.0%, Canadian Heart Classification (CHC) class I or II 40.5%, positive and extremely positive stress test 54.4% and 33.3%, single vessel disease 72.5%. The long-term follow-up was determined by questionnaire 91 +/- 21 months after PTCA, and a complete 5-year follow-up was available in 95.4% of all patients. RESULTS: According to RAND's 1991 published criteria, 1.0% of all indications were rated "inappropriate", 21.4% "uncertain", 27.1% "appropriate", and 50.5% "necessary". Before PTCA, patients rated "uncertain" were less symptomatic and had a higher exercise capacity than patients rated "necessary" (CHC I or II: 85.0% vs. 8.7%, p < 0.001; 693 +/- 214 vs. 520 +/- 251 watts*min, p < 0.001). Following PTCA, "uncertain" patients reported less often a lasting symptomatic improvement or freedom of symptoms than "necessary" patients (63.9% vs. 76.3%, p = n.s.), and they experienced no relevant improvement in exercise capacity (10 +/- 263 vs. 139 +/- 308 watts*min, p < 0.05). The acute success rate was significantly lower for patients who underwent PTCA for indications rated "revascularization necessary" or "CABG necessary", p < 0.03. This resulted in a high rate of CABG within the first year for patients with these rating (29.0% and 36.1%, compared to 15.0% to 20.6% in cases rated "uncertain", "appropriate", or "PTCA necessary", p < 0.02). Only in patients with the rating "PTCA necessary" (n = 184), a significant difference in long-term survival was observed between successful and unsuccessful uncomplicated cases (5-year-survival-probability 97.8 +/- 1.3% vs. 85.5 +/- 6.0%, p < 0.001). In contrast, "uncertain" cases (n = 107) had a 5-year-survival-probability of 94.8 +/- 2.5% following successful and 94.4 +/- 5.4% following unsuccessful PTCA. CONCLUSION: These results are in agreement with both hypotheses and therefore support the validity of RAND's 1991 appropriateness and necessity criteria for PTCA in a historic series of patients. Thus, even if these particular ratings may be outdated today, the technique of appropriateness and necessity rating is expected to be a useful and valid tool for quality assessment in PTCA.     

Long-term (10-year) outcome in patients with unstable angina pectoris treated by coronary balloon angioplasty

OBJECTIVES: We sought to examine completed 10-year survival and event-free survival in patients with stable and unstable angina pectoris treated by coronary balloon angioplasty. BACKGROUND: Patients with unstable angina are at increased risk for recurrent acute coronary events. METHODS: The study included 208 consecutive patients (133 with stable and 75 with unstable angina pectoris) undergoing angioplasty from 1984 to 1986. The balloon crossed the lesion in 185 patients (121 with stable and 64 with unstable angina pectoris). Angioplasty was performed in patients with unstable angina pectoris 12+/-15 days (median 8) after symptom onset. Patients with unstable angina pectoris were classified retrospectively into Braunwald class I (n=3), class II (n=20), class III (n=28), class B (n=52) and class C (n=12). Follow-up data were obtained from hospital charts, telephone interview and official death certificates where applicable. The study had >80% power to detect a clinically significant 20% difference in survival and a 20% difference in event-free survival between the stable and unstable patient groups. RESULTS: Despite similar baseline characteristics, early (40-day) mortality was slightly higher in patients with unstable angina (4.7% [3 of 64 patients] vs. 0.8% [1 of 121 patients], p=NS). Long-term outcome was not different, because survival curves were parallel thereafter (10-year survival was 83% for those with stable and 77% for those with unstable angina, p=NS). Survival free of myocardial infarction or coronary artery bypass graft surgery at 10 years was 53% in patients with stable and 47% in patients with unstable angina (p=NS), and survival free of infarction, bypass surgery or repeat angioplasty was 32% for both groups at 10 years. In patients with Braunwald class III unstable angina, 10-year survival was 80%, as compared with 85% in other patients with unstable angina, due to the early hazard (p=NS). Survival and event-free survival were similar in patients who had had a recent myocardial infarction (Braunwald class C) and in patients with acute electrocardiographic changes. Repeat hospital admissions were not more frequent in patients with unstable angina (3.1+/-3.5 vs. 3.0+/-2.6, p=NS). CONCLUSIONS: Ten-year survival and event-free survival were similar in patients with stable and unstable angina pectoris treated by coronary balloon angioplasty, with no evidence of an increased rate of recurrent cardiovascular events in the unstable group.     

Diabetes mellitus, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade, and heparin: evidence for a complex interaction in a multicenter trial. EPILOG Investigators

BACKGROUND: After angioplasty, major complications and ischemic events occur more frequently in diabetic than nondiabetic patients. To determine whether treatment with abciximab is effective in reducing these events in diabetics, we analyzed characteristics and outcomes of diabetic patients enrolled in a large multicenter study (EPILOG). METHODS AND RESULTS: Of 2792 patients enrolled, 638 (23%) were diabetic. Diabetic patients were older, shorter, and heavier; more likely to be female and have three-vessel disease, prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery, a history of hypertension, or a recent myocardial infarction; and less likely to be current smokers than their nondiabetic counterparts. During hospitalization, death, myocardial infarction, or urgent revascularization occurred in 7.1% of diabetics and 7.5% of nondiabetics. By 6 months, the composite of death and myocardial infarction had occurred in 8.8% of diabetic patients and 7.4% of nondiabetics, whereas death, myocardial infarction, or revascularization had occurred in 27.2% and 22.6%, respectively. Abciximab treatment reduced death or myocardial infarction among diabetic and nondiabetic patients (hazard ratios, 0.28 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.13 to 0.57] and 0.47 [95% CI, 0.33 to 0.70] at 30 days for diabetics and nondiabetics, respectively, and 0.36 [95% CI, 0.21 to 0.61] and 0.60 [95% CI, 0.44 to 0.82] at 6 months for diabetics and nondiabetics, respectively). Abciximab reduced target vessel revascularization among nondiabetic patients (hazard ratio, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.63 to 0.96]) but not among diabetics (hazard ratio, 1.4 [95% CI, 0.94 to 2.08]). When standard- and low-dose heparin adjuncts were compared, diabetics receiving abciximab with standard-dose heparin had marginally greater reductions in the composite of death and myocardial infarction and in target vessel revascularization than diabetics assigned to abciximab with low-dose heparin. CONCLUSIONS: Abciximab treatment in diabetic patients led to a reduction in the composite of death and myocardial infarction, which was at least as great as that seen in nondiabetic patients. However, target vessel revascularization was reduced in nondiabetic but not diabetic patients. This effect may be associated in part with lower doses of heparin. These differences may be related to differences in the platelet and coagulation systems between diabetics and nondiabetics, the greater extent of coronary artery disease in diabetics, or patient selection and management factors.     

Characteristics of patients less than 45 years of age compared with older patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery disease (CAD) was not recognized as common among young patients until the study by Yater in 1948. Subsequent studies further elucidated the nature of the disease, which had become more apparent in the younger groups. HYPOTHESIS: The study was undertaken to determine the prevalence of risk factors and severity of coronary disease among young patients aged < or = 45 years undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) compared with older patients. METHODS: In all, 112 young patients aged < or = 45 years (Group 1) and 798 older patients aged > 45 years (Group 2) were analyzed for trends to hypertension, smoking, diabetes, family history of heart disease, hypercholesterolemia, obesity, and history of previous myocardial infarction (MI). The severity of disease was examined in terms of number of diseased vessels, vessel size, number of grafts performed, performance of endarterectomies, and left ventricular function. RESULTS: Group 1 had a higher incidence of positive family history (68.5 vs. 51.2%, p < 0.05), and lower incidences of hypertension (62.7 vs. 81.5%, p < 0.05), obesity (42.9 vs. 83.9%, p < 0.05), and history of previous MI (54.5 vs. 94.6%, p < 0.05). Group 2 had a higher incidence of left main disease (22.6 vs. 11.4%, p < 0.05). The distribution of the affected vessels of the young patients was most commonly the left anterior descending (90.4%) followed by the right coronary (79.8%) and circumflex arteries (69.2%). Group 2 had more grafts per patient (3.82 vs. 3.37, p < 0.05). The size of the diseased vessels measured intraoperatively was similar (1.56 vs. 1.58 mm, p = NS) in both groups. Endarterectomy was performed almost three times more often in Group 1 patients (8.2 vs. 3.0%, p < 0.05). Operative mortality was less in Group 1 mean (1.8 vs. 6.3%, p < 0.05). Group 2 had a greater mean left ventricular ejection fraction (53.8 vs. 49.7%, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Compared with the older population, patients < or = 45 years of age who underwent CABG had (1) a higher incidence of positive family history of CAD, (2) a higher likelihood of requiring an endarterectomy, and (3) lower operative mortality rate despite a slightly poorer ventricular function.     

Predictors of CABG within one year of successful PTCA: a retrospective, case-control study

BACKGROUND: We previously have established characteristics predictive of the need for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) over many years after successful percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). In this study, we examined the factors associated with the need for CABG within 1 year of successful PTCA, and the recent impact of newer, catheter-based technologies. METHODS: From January 1982 through December 1995, 234 patients underwent CABG within 1 year of a successful "index" PTCA at our hospital. Emergency operations within 12 hours of index PTCA were excluded. These cases were matched with 234 controls who underwent a successful index PTCA but did not require a subsequent CABG during the next year. Cases were matched by the date of their index PTCA, and 1-year follow-up was complete for all patients. RESULTS: Before index PTCA there were no differences between the groups in terms of age, sex, diabetes, prior myocardial infarction, ejection fraction, duration of anginal symptoms, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, family history, or obesity (all nonsignificant). At index PTCA the cases had a greater mean number of lesions measuring 70% or greater compared with the controls (2.8 versus 1.8, respectively; p < 0.0001). The cases were more likely to have critical (70% or greater) proximal left anterior descending artery, proximal first obtuse marginal artery, and right posterior descending artery stenoses. The use of stents or atherectomy devices was not significantly more common among the controls (21% of controls versus 17.1% of cases; p = 0.35). Complete revascularization was achieved in significantly fewer of the cases than the controls (91 versus 156, respectively; p < 0.0001). The cases underwent CABG at a mean of 3 months (86% within 6 months) after PTCA. Among those who had a diagnostic catheterization, 52% of the patients had both restenosis of a dilated lesion and progression of other disease. Only 5 of 75 patients who had restenosis of a dilated lesion had a stent or an atherectomy device used at index PTCA. Of note, 13% (30 of 234) required an emergency operation, with an overall operative mortality rate of 3% (7 of 234). CONCLUSIONS: Although the likelihood of local restenosis is decreased by newer interventional techniques, the need for CABG within 1 year after successful PTCA is not diminished. The number of critical lesions and their location are the best predictors of the need for early CABG. If early post-PTCA CABG is to be avoided, patients who cannot be completely revascularized by PTCA should be revascularized by CABG.     

Prediction of death and myocardial infarction by screening with exercise-thallium testing after coronary-artery-bypass grafting

BACKGROUND: The role of myocardial-perfusion imaging in calculating risk in symptom-free patients who have had coronary-artery-bypass grafting (CABG) is unclear. Practice guidelines have argued against routine screening of these patients. We sought to find out the independent and incremental prognostic value of exercise thallium-201 single-photon-emission computed tomography (SPECT) for prediction of death and non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI) in these patients. METHODS: Analyses were based on 873 symptom-free patients undergoing symptom-limited exercise thallium-201 SPECT between September, 1990, and December, 1993. All had undergone CABG and none had recurrent angina or other major intercurrent coronary events. Exercise and thallium-perfusion variables were analysed to determine their prognostic importance during 3 years of follow-up. FINDINGS: Myocardial-perfusion defects were noted in 508 (58%) patients. There were 57 deaths and 72 patients had major events (death or non-fatal MI). Patients with thallium-perfusion defects were more likely to die (9% vs 3%, p=0.0004) or suffer a major event (11% vs 4%, p=0.0002). Reversible defects were also predictive of death (12% vs 5%, p=0.002) and major events (13% vs 7%, p=0.004). The exercise variable with the strongest predictive power was an impaired (< or = 6 METs [measure of oxygen consumption equal to 3.5 mL/kg/min]) exercise capacity; poor exercise capacity was predictive of death (18% vs 4%, p<0.0001) and death or non-fatal MI (19% vs 5%, p<.00001). After adjusting for baseline clinical variables, surgical variables, time elapsed since CABG, and standard cardiovascular risk factors, thallium-perfusion defects remained predictive of death (adjusted relative risk 2.78, 95% CI 1.44-5.39) and major events (2.63, 1.49-4.66). Similarly, impaired exercise remained strongly predictive of death (4.16, 2.38-7.29) and major events (3.61, 2.22-5.87) after adjusting for confounders. INTERPRETATION: In this group of patients who were symptom-free after CABG, thallium-perfusion defects and impaired exercise capacity were strong and independent predictors of subsequent death or non-fatal MI. Recommendations against routine screening exercise myocardial-perfusion studies in this setting should be reconsidered.     

Health service costs of coronary angioplasty and coronary artery bypass surgery: the Randomised Intervention Treatment of Angina (RITA) trial

For some patients with coronary artery disease, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) is an alternative to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). We report comparative health service costs of these interventions within the Randomised Intervention Treatment of Angina (RITA) trial. Medications were costed at published UK prices; other resource use was costed with a set of unit costs estimated at two recruiting centres to the RITA trial, one in London and one outside. Over 2-year follow-up of 1011 patients, the estimated mean additional cost for those randomised to CABG compared with PTCA was 1050 pounds (95% CI 621 pounds-1479 pounds), with unit costs from the non-London centre, and 1823 pounds (1202 pounds-2444 pounds), with unit costs from the London centre. The initial average cost of treating a patient randomised to PTCA is about 52% of that of CABG, but after 2 years this increased to about 80% because of the greater need for subsequent interventions. The balance of advantage between PTCA and CABG may change after several years: funding has been obtained to continue RITA follow-up for 10 years. However, on the basis of patients' status at 2 years, the cost advantages of PTCA cannot be ignored. Further research is necessary to assess whether the advantage of PTCA in terms of cost is translated into one of cost-effectiveness.     

Thrombolysis plus aortic counterpulsation: improved survival in patients who present to community hospitals with cardiogenic shock

OBJECTIVES: We sought to explore the potential benefit of combining intraaortic balloon counterpulsation (IABP) with thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction (MI) complicated by cardiogenic shock. BACKGROUND: In community hospitals, this condition is usually managed with thrombolysis alone. METHODS: We reviewed the charts of 335 patients from two community hospitals who presented with acute MI and had cardiogenic shock between 1985 and 1995. RESULTS: Of 46 patients who underwent thrombolysis within 12 h of acute infarction with confirmed cardiogenic shock, 27 underwent IABP and 19 did not. Age, systolic blood pressure with shock, pulmonary artery catheter use, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure and the incidence of diabetes mellitus and anterior MI did not differ between groups. Patients treated with IABP were somewhat more likely to have prior MI and had a significantly greater cardiac index (2.0 vs. 1.5 liters/min per m2, p = 0.04). Although no deaths occurred within 2 h of presentation, patients not treated with IABP tended to die earlier (6.8 +/- 5 vs. 23.8 +/- 19 h, p = 0.13). Patients treated with IABP had a significantly higher rate of community hospital survival (93% vs. 37%, p = 0.0002), and more of them were transferred for revascularization (85% vs. 37%). Of 30 patients transferred for revascularization, 27 underwent angioplasty or bypass surgery; hospital survival was 74%. Patients treated with IABP also had a significantly higher overall hospital and 1-year survival rate (67% vs. 32%, p = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS: Survival may be enhanced and transfer for revascularization facilitated when community hospitals use both thrombolysis and IABP to treat patients with acute MI complicated by cardiogenic shock.     

Paternal uniparental disomy for chromosome 1 revealed by molecular analysis of a patient with pycnodysostosis

OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the prognostic capabilities of exercise thallium (Tl)-201 tomographic imaging performed relatively early (within 2 years) after coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). BACKGROUND: Exercise testing is commonly performed after CABG, but few data exist demonstrating its prognostic value in this setting. METHODS: Four hundred eleven patients were followed up for a median duration of 5.8 years. Eleven prospectively chosen clinical, exercise and Tl-201 variables were tested for their associations with outcome end points by means of proportional hazards regression models. RESULTS: During follow-up there were 60 deaths from any cause, 53 initial cardiac deaths or nonfatal myocardial infarctions (MIs) and 22 late (>3 months after the Tl-201 study) revascularization procedures. The number of abnormal Tl-201 segments on the postexercise image was the only variable in the multivariate analyses to show a significant association with all three outcome end points: chi-square 7.3, p = 0.007 for overall mortality; chi-square 8.1, p = 0.004 for cardiac death or MI; chi-square 7.8, p = 0.005 for any cardiac event. Other independent predictors of outcome were exercise duration (chi-square 10.7, p = 0.001) and age (chi-square 3.9, p = 0.049) for overall mortality and exercise angina score (chi-square 8.7, p = 0.003) for cardiac death or MI. The 5-year survival rate free of cardiac death or MI was 93% for patients without angina and a normal image or small postexercise perfusion defect versus 71% for patients with angina and a medium or large defect. CONCLUSIONS: Exercise Tl-201 imaging performed within 2 years of CABG can stratify patients into low and high risk subgroups.     

Isolation of human intestinal defensins from ileal neobladder urine

Restenosis is a major limitation of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). In this study, we assessed the impact of restenosis on PTCA with reference to coronary angioplasty bypass grafting (CABG). In the Coronary Angioplasty versus Bypass Revascularisation Investigation (CABRI) PTCA population, those who had restenosis were defined as those needing a second revascularization at a site revascularized at the initial procedure. The 1-year clinical outcome of the nonrestenotic group (n=437) was compared with those who underwent CABG (n=453). There was no difference in deaths. In the nonrestenotic PTCA group, the incidence of more infarctions was insignificant (relative risk [RR] 1.9, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.96 to 3.75, p=0.064), there was a much greater need for repeat revascularization (RR 8.6, CI 5.14 to 14.41, p <0.0005), and patients had a poorer angina status (RR 1.46, CI 1.01 to 2.13, p=0.046). Using 2 measures of coronary disease, the degree of pre- and postrevascularization disease was compared between groups. There were no differences in prerevascularization disease. However, using either measure, residual postrevascularization disease was more frequent in the nonrestenotic PTCA group. Restenosis only partially accounts for the greater morbidity seen after PTCA, compared with CABG, in multivessel disease. The greater likelihood of residual disease post-PTCA may contribute to this greater morbidity.