The detection of cytochrome P450 2E1 and its catalytic activity in rat testis

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of 100 micrograms of salbutamol inhaled from a new metered-dose powder inhaler (MDPI, Leiras Taifun, Finland) with that of a same dose of salbutamol inhaled from a conventional pressurized metered-dose inhaler with a large volume spacer (pMDI + S) in protecting against methacholine (Mch) induced bronchoconstriction. This was a 3 day, randomized, cross-over, partly blinded, placebo-controlled multicentre study where the pMDI + S was used as an open control. Twenty-six asthmatic outpatients with a baseline FEV1 > or = 60% of predicted and with bronchial hyperreactivity (PD20 FEV1 < or = 890 micrograms of Mch) were studied. On each study day the patients underwent an Mch provocation 30 min after inhaling placebo from the MDPI or a dose of 100 micrograms of salbutamol from the MDPI and from the pMDI + S. PD20 FEV1 and dose-response slope [DRS; maximal change in FEV1 (%)/dose of Mch (mumol)] were used to evaluate efficacy. The median values of PD20 FEV1 were 250, 622 and 1737 micrograms after placebo MDPI, salbutamol pMDI + S and salbutamol MDPI, respectively. The corresponding DRS values were -11.0%, -4.5% and -2.0% mumol-1. With both parameters, all differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). In conclusion, 100 micrograms of salbutamol inhaled from Leiras Taifun MDPI offers better protection against Mch-induced bronchoconstriction than 100 micrograms of salbutamol from a pMDI connected to a large volume spacer device.     

Bronchodilator response to salbutamol after spontaneous recovery from nonspecific bronchial provocation tests in asthma

Assessment of airway responsiveness by bronchoprovocation and bronchodilatation tests is important in the diagnostic work-up protocol of bronchial asthma and it would be convenient to undertake both tests on the same occasion. However, it is not known whether this can be done accurately. Therefore, this study evaluated the effect of a prior bronchial provocation test on the bronchodilator response to salbutamol after spontaneous recovery of the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) in a group of asthmatic subjects. On two separate occasions at the same time of day, concentration-response studies with inhaled histamine or methacholine, or a sham challenge with normal saline were carried out in a blinded, randomized manner. Changes in airway calibre were followed as FEV1 and agonist responsiveness expressed as the provocative concentration causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20). After either spontaneous recovery or a fixed-duration wait of 45 min (when appropriate), the subjects received 2x100 microg of salbutamol from a metered dose inhaler with a spacer. The bronchodilator response to salbutamol was expressed as a percentage of initial FEV1 (deltaFEV1% init). Bronchial challenge with both agonists failed to alter significantly the airway response to salbutamol, with the deltaFEV1% init mean value (range) being 16.9% (9.0-31.9) and 17.5% (11.6-31.2) on the sham and histamine/methacholine challenge day respectively. It was shown that the degree of bronchodilatation achieved after salbutamol 200 microg is not affected by prior bronchoprovocation testing when enough time is allowed for the airways to recover spontaneously to baseline forced expiratory volume in one second. Thus evaluation of airway responsiveness by both bronchial provocation tests and bronchodilator testing can be assessed reliably within a few hours in asthmatic patients.     

High-dose inhaled budesonide may substitute for oral therapy after an acute asthma attack

Patients attending the emergency room with acute asthma, participating in a study comparing salbutamol (albuterol in the United States) via a dry powder inhaler (Turbuhaler) with pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI), were included in this 1-week follow-up study with the aim of assessing whether inhaled budesonide via Turbuhaler may be an alternative to prednisolone tablets after an acute asthma attack. Eighty-one patients with a mean age of 38 years and forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1) of 64% predicted normal value after treatment with salbutamol were randomized in this double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study. The doses given were budesonide 1600 microg b.i.d. or prednisolone in daily doses from 40 mg (day 1) decreased to 5 mg (day 7). FEV1 was recorded before and after the 7-day treatments and peak expiratory flow (PEF) morning and evening, clinical symptoms (visual analogue scale 0-100), and doses of rescue medication (terbutaline Turbuhaler 0.25 mg/dose) were recorded daily. The mean increase in FEV1 from baseline to day 7 was 17.3% in the budesonide Turbuhaler group and 17.6% in the prednisolone group. Mean values of morning PEF increased from day 1 to day 7 by 67 L/min in the budesonide Turbuhaler group and by 57 L/min in the prednisolone group (not significant). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in clinical symptoms and in the number of doses of rescue medication. Because of disease deterioration, five patients in the Turbuhaler group and three in the prednisolone group needed additional symptomatic as well as corticosteroid treatment. Inhaled budesonide in high doses may be a substitute for oral therapy as follow-up treatment after an acute asthma attack.     

Measuring hospital performance: are we asking the right questions?

The aim of this randomized cross-over trial was to evaluate the dose effect and systemic absorption of epinephrine nebulized at 2 and 5 mg in comparison with salbutamol (5 mg). Thirteen asthmatic patients (29 +/- 15 years, 4 men and 9 women) were randomly assigned to receive one nebulization of each of the three treatment regimens at 24 h interval. The evaluation concerned forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), heart rate, respiratory rate and arterial pressure. All measurements were done at baseline, every 15 minutes during the first hour, and hourly thereafter until return to baseline FEV1. Serum potassium was measured at baseline (T0) and sixty minutes after (T60). Plasma levels of epinephrine were measured at T0, T20, T60. Fifteen minutes after the beginning of nebulization FEV1 improved significantly over baseline in the three groups. These changes were similar in the three groups until T45, while FEV1 improvement was significantly greater in A5 and S groups than A2 group (+640 +/- 470 ml, +721 +/- 349 ml, +406 +/- 306 ml in A5, S and A2 groups respectively, p < 0.01). Bronchodilation lasted significantly longer with salbutamol than with epinephrine (p < 0.05). No side effects were recorded in spite of substantial and dose-dependent systemic absorption of epinephrine. CONCLUSION: Increasing epinephrine doses produces greater bronchodilation without additional side effects. However this bronchodilation lasts shorter than with salbutamol.     

Effect of short- and long-acting inhaled beta2-agonists on exhaled nitric oxide in asthmatic patients

Increased concentrations of exhaled nitric oxide (NO) occur in patients with asthma, and exhaled NO may be useful for assessing the effect of drug therapy on airway inflammation. Beta2-agonists have been proposed to have both proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory effects. We therefore assessed exhaled NO after beta2-agonists in asthmatic patients. Two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies were conducted. Firstly, exhaled NO was measured in 18 asthmatics (9 taking inhaled glucocorticosteroids (GCS)) before and after nebulized salbutamol (5 mg), or identical placebo (0.9% saline). Exhaled NO and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) were measured at 15 min intervals for 1 h (Study 1). Secondly, the effect of 1 week of treatment with the long-acting beta2-agonist, salmeterol (50 microg b.i.d.), added to either budesonide (800 microg b.i.d.) or placebo, was studied in eight mild asthmatic subjects (Study 2). Exhaled NO was measured by a chemiluminescence analyser, adapted for on-line recording. In Study 1, exhaled NO showed no significant change at any time-point in patients not taking inhaled GCS. In asthmatics on inhaled GCS, exhaled NO increased compared to placebo at 15 and 30 min, but this did not reach statistical significance. In Study 2, treatment with salmeterol increased FEV1, but exhaled NO levels were not significantly changed, either after budesonide treatment (143+/-35 to 179+/-67 ppb), or after placebo (201+/-68 to 211+/-65 ppb). Our results confirm that single high dose salbutamol does not increase exhaled nitric oxide in asthmatics not taking inhaled glucocorticosteroids. Salbutamol may increase exhaled nitric oxide in asthmatics taking inhaled glucocorticosteroids. However, regular use of salmeterol resulted in no change in exhaled nitric oxide, either used alone or in combination with inhaled glucocorticosteroids.     

Valproate reduces intake of alcoholic beverage among rats

SETTING: University of Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. OBJECTIVE: To assess the awareness of the ozone layer and the acceptance of the new non-chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) propellant hydrofluoroalkane 134a salbutamol pressurised metered dose inhaler (MDI) Airomir among asthmatic patients. DESIGN: A total of 113 consecutive asthmatic patients aged 12 years and above from the out- and in-patient services of the hospital were interviewed using a questionnaire. RESULTS: Sixty-five per cent of the patients were aware of the existence of the ozone layer, 23% that CFCs play a role in ozone depletion, and only 10% that current MDIs contained CFCs. All the patients felt that pressurised MDIs should be made CFC-free after they had considered the role of CFCs in the destruction of the ozone layer. Eighty-one per cent of 94 patients who preferred the Airomir inhaler over a multi-dose dry powder inhaler for administering bronchodilator medications were willing to switch to the new inhaler once it became available on the market. CONCLUSION: Awareness of the damaging effect of CFCs on the ozone layer among asthmatic patients would encourage them to change to an ozone-friendly, CFC-free pressurised MDI.     

Additive effect of nitroglycerine inhalation on beta2-agonist-induced bronchodilatation in asthmatics

The current treatment of airway obstruction using beta-agonists and theophylline is designed to increase intracellular level of cAMP. Experimental data show that cGMP and cAMP induce functionally additive relaxation of airways. Nitrates relax smooth muscle through the activation of guanylate cyclase. We wondered whether an additive effect of nitroglycerin (NTG) on beta2-agonist-induced bronchodilatation was present in asthmatic patients. To this aim we evaluated the acute bronchodilating effect of inhaled salbutamol (200 mu g MDI) in 10 asthmatics, pre-treated with inhaled NTG or placebo, in a double-blind cross-over design. FEV1 after NTG was higher than that obtained after placebo (2197 +/- 175 vs. 1981 +/- 155 ml, P <0.001). Mean FEV1 obtained 5 min after salbutamol was higher when patients were pre-treated with NTG than placebo (2694 +/- 217 vs 2440 +/- 228 ml respectively, P <0.001). The bronchodilatation due to salbutamol was identical whether NTG or placebo was inhaled first, respectively at 458 +/- 68 and 497 +/- 44 ml after 5 min. After 15 min FEV1 was higher than baseline, but no significant difference was still present between the value observed after pre-treatment with NTG or placebo (2554 +/- 235 and 2551 +/- 205 ml respectively). In conclusion, in asthmatics nebulized NTG produces a moderate and short-lasting bronchodilatation, which is additive with that produced by salbutamol.     

Effect of addition of inhaled salmeterol to the treatment of moderate-to-severe asthmatics uncontrolled on high-dose inhaled steroids. European Respiratory Study Group

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of inhaled salmeterol 100 micrograms b.d. (SM) versus inhaled salbutamol 400 micrograms q.d.s. (SB), both via the Diskhaler, when added to concurrent treatment, in asthmatic patients who were not controlled on high doses of inhaled steroids (> or = 1,500 micrograms beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) or equivalent daily). This was a multicentre, parallel group, double-blind study in which 190 patients with a forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) or peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) of 30-75% predicted and 15% reversibility to inhaled bronchodilator were randomized to treatment for 6 weeks. In the SM group, morning PEFR increased from 281 to 315 L-min-1 during treatment and in the SB group from 311 to 315 L.min-1 (p < 0.001). The SM group showed significantly better reduction in diurnal variation, from 39 to 22 L.min-1 during treatment, than the SB group (34 to 37 L.min-1) (p < 0.001). There was a significantly greater improvement in FEV1 in the SM group (from 1.63 to 1.85 L) than in the SB group (from 1.79 to 1.84 L). The SM group had significantly more symptom-free nights than the SB group (p < 0.001), and also more "rescue-free" nights (p = 0.04). The adverse event profile was similar in both groups. This study indicates that in asthmatic patients, not controlled on high-dose inhaled steroids, inhaled salmeterol 100 micrograms b.d. significantly improves lung function and reduces asthma symptoms.     

Is asthma treatment affordable in developing countries?

BACKGROUND: A study was undertaken to assess whether the therapeutic aspects of published international asthma management guidelines are practically applicable in developing countries. METHODS: Questionnaires were sent to expatriate doctors working in developing countries. RESULTS: Forty one replies were received from 24 countries in Africa and Asia. Oral salbutamol was prescribed "usually" or "often" by 35 of the 41 respondents, theophyllines by 30, inhaled bronchodilators by 12, inhaled steroids by two, and cromoglycate by two. Theophyllines were locally available in all 41 cases, oral salbutamol in 40, inhaled bronchodilators in 34, and inhaled steroids (usually beclomethasone 50 micrograms) in only 15. Where they were available, the median (range) coat of a beclomethasone 50 micrograms inhaler was 20% (6.8-100%) of average local monthly income, salbutamol inhaler 13% (3.3-250%), 90 salbutamol 4 mg tablets 3.8% (0.8-75%), and 90 aminophylline 100 mg tablets 4.5% (0.5-70%). If they were available locally at a cheaper price, 34 (83%) respondents would prescribe more inhaled steroids and 37 (90%) would prescribe more inhaled bronchodilators. CONCLUSIONS: Many asthma patients in developing countries are not receiving adequate treatment because the required drugs are not available in their area or are prohibitively expensive.     

Relaxin activates the L-arginine-nitric oxide pathway in vascular smooth muscle cells in culture

The effects of usual or low doses of inhaled corticosteroids on airway mucosal inflammation have not yet been examined. We therefore, compared the effects of inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) 336 microg x day(-1) on asthma control outcomes and markers of airway inflammation. Twenty-four adult subjects with mild and moderate asthma were randomized to receive either BDP or placebo for four weeks; then subjects entered a single blind four week placebo run-in period. We found that the BDP group had significantly greater improvements in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), morning peak flow, and rescue salbutamol use than the placebo-treated group. The improvement in FEV1 largely reversed one week after treatment was stopped. The decrease in the median percentage of eosinophils in induced sputum in the BDP group from 3.8% to 3.4% was not significant, but because eosinophils increased from 8.4% to 12.7% in the placebo group, there was a significant difference between treatment groups (p=0.03). There was no significant difference between groups during treatment in the levels of eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), tryptase mucin-like glycoprotein, or fibrinogen in induced sputum. The change in FEV1 in the BDP group did not correlate significantly with the change in eosinophil percentage or ECP levels. We concluded that four weeks of treatment with inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate 336 microg x day(-1) was associated with significant improvements in peak flow, forced expiratory volume in one second, and rescue salbutamol use in asthmatic subjects but was not associated with large reductions in markers of eosinophilic inflammation, bronchovascular permeability, or mucus hypersecretion.     

Duration of action of formoterol and salbutamol dry-powder inhalation in prevention of exercise-induced asthma in children

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect and tolerability of formoterol 12 micrograms on exercise-induced asthma in children for 12 h as compared to the effect of salbutamol 400 micrograms and placebo. The drugs were inhaled as dry powder from a flow-dependent metered-dose inhaler (DP-MDI). Sixteen asthmatic children took part in a double-blind placebo-controlled within-patient single-centre trial. On each study day the patients were given one of the drugs or placebo in random order, and standardized exercise tests were performed after 3 and 12 h. At a pretrial test the children had demonstrated a median maximum percentage fall of 38% (range 22-79%) in forced expiratory volume in 1 s after exercise challenge. Formoterol showed a median percentage protection of 77% and 70% at 3 and 12 h postexercise, respectively, as compared to 46% and 13% with salbutamol. No side-effects were observed. Formoterol 12 micrograms administered as dry powder offers significantly better protection against exercise-induced asthma after 3 and 12 h as compared to salbutamol 400 micrograms and placebo.     

Single centre open study to compare patient recording of PRN salbutamol use on a daily diary card with actual use as recorded by the MDI compliance monitor

The aim of this study was to assess the patients' use of inhaled short acting bronchodilators as rescue therapy during a 4-week study period. In this study an electronic metered-dose inhaler compliance monitor (MDI-CM) was used to measure the time and date of actuations of the device and this information was then compared with the patients' self reporting diary card (DC). Salbutamol canisters were used in the compliance monitor. The study was approved by the local ethics committee, and written informed consent was obtained from all patients. Patients aged 18 years and over who were either receiving, or in the investigators opinion required, inhaled salbutamol on a PRN basis were enrolled for a 4-week monitoring phase during which all rescue salbutamol used was obtained from the MDI-CM. Patients were recording their use of salbutamol in the DC each morning and evening. There was a 2-week follow-up period following completion of the monitoring phase or withdrawal from the study. Forty-four patients were enrolled and 35 patients completed the study. The mean age (range) was 43 (20-76) years and mean FEV1 2.32 (0.7-4.0) 1, with male:female ratio of 19:25. Comparison of MDI-CM and DC recordings showed patients fell into three categories: (1) patients who used rescue salbutamol appropriately and whose MDI-CM and DC recordings matched closely; (2) patients who used rescue salbutamol for acute relief but whose MDI-CM and DC recordings did not correlate and (3) patients whose use of rescue salbutamol was inappropriate or erratic according to the MDI-CM but whose DC indicated good compliance. This category of patients include those who 'dumped' all their salbutamol before attending clinic appointments. There was no significant difference in the demographic details or the severity of disease in the three groups. Recorded use of 'rescue' bronchodilator is frequently used as an indicator of efficacy for new anti-asthma therapies. This study comparing electronic data monitoring and remembered rescue salbutamol highlights the potential errors that can occur without accurate recording systems.     

An inhaled steroid improves markers of airway inflammation in patients with mild asthma

Airway inflammation can be demonstrated in mildly asthmatic patients who are not treated with inhaled steroids. Current guidelines recommend that inhaled steroids should be introduced in mild asthmatics who use an inhaled beta2-agonist more than once daily. It was postulated that inhaled steroids can have anti-inflammatory effects in patients with even milder disease. The effect of 4 weeks of treatment with budesonide (800 microg twice daily by Turbohaler) was studied in 10 steroid-naive mildly asthmatic patients (forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) = 96+/-1.4% predicted) who required an inhaled beta2-agonist less than one puff daily, in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover fashion. Spirometry, exhaled nitric oxide (NO), bronchial responsiveness (provocative concentration causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20)), and sputum induction were performed before and after each treatment period. Following budesonide treatment, there were significant improvements in FEV1, and PC20, in association with a significant reduction in the percentage of eosinophils in induced sputum. Exhaled NO levels tended towards reduction, but the change was nonsignificant. There were also nonsignificant reductions in sputum eosinophil cationic protein and tumour necrosis factor-alpha levels. In conclusion inhaled budesonide can lead to improvements in noninvasive markers of airway inflammation, in association with a small improvement in lung function, even in mildly asthmatic patients who require an inhaled beta2-agonist less than once daily. This suggests a potential benefit of inhaled corticosteroids, even in relatively asymptomatic asthma.     

Formoterol inhaled as dry powder or via pressurized metered-dose inhaler in a cumulative dose-response study

Formoterol administered by a dry-powder (DP) capsule inhaler was compared with a pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) with regard to bronchodilating and systemic effects. The study used a double-blind, crossover, double-dummy technique. Twelve patients with moderate reversible asthma in a stable phase were examined on two separate study days, and the inhalers were given in randomized order. After baseline measurements, increasing doses of formoterol were given at intervals of 75 min. FEV1 and heart rate and tremor measurements were repeated after each dose, and the doses were 12 + 12 + 24 + 48 micrograms, giving a total dose of 96 micrograms. The peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) was recorded in the morning before the first dose, after the last dose, and then repeatedly at home until 19 h after the last dose. There was an equal increase in ventilatory capacity at each dose level, independent of inhaler device. Repeated PEFR measurements after the last dose did not reveal any differences in duration of effect. There was a slight but statistically significant increase in heart rate and tremor after the highest doses of the DP formulation compared to the pMDI. These systemic effects can probably be explained by the reduced oral deposition of the aerosol caused by using a spacer. This study indicates that the DP and pMDI formulations of formoterol are equipotent in bronchodilation.     

The efficacy of inhaled corticosteroids in the management of non asthmatic chronic airflow obstruction

AIMS: The aims of this investigation were to evaluate the efficacy of regular inhaled beclomethasone in the control of symptoms and lung function with non-asthmatic smoking related obstructive pulmonary disease and to evaluate the relationship between clinical responses to a short course of oral prednisone and longer term outcomes using inhaled steroid. METHODS: The study was a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled, crossover investigation in 18 patients. The active treatment was inhaled beclomethasone 1000 micrograms given twice daily for three months by metered dose inhaler. At the end of each treatment period, patients received oral prednisone 30 mg/day for ten days. The two treatment phases were separated by a one month washout interval. Peak flow rates, symptom scores and "rescue" bronchodilator use were recorded twice daily. Lung function (FEV1, FVC and lung volumes) and bronchial hyperresponsiveness (PC20 methacholine) were measured at monthly visits. The number of exacerbations requiring intervention therapy were also recorded. RESULTS: There were no consistent benefits attributable to beclomethasone. Lung function was not significantly better as a result of active treatment. Sputum production improved but other symptom scores were similar during active and placebo therapy. Three patients exhibited an increase in FEV1 of 15% or more during active treatment but did not do so when oral prednisone was administered immediately after the period of placebo treatment. A further three patients showed an improvement in FEV1 of 15% or more with oral prednisone but failed to improve during treatment with inhaled beclomethasone. The predictive value of the "trial of steroid" was 0% and 81.3% for positive and negative outcomes respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that in non-asthmatic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease inhaled corticosteroid fails to achieve significant improvements in either lung function or symptoms. The response to a "trial of steroid" using oral prednisone is not clinically helpful in selecting the small number of patients who may subsequently benefit from this form of therapy.     

Cumulative dose-response study of non-CFC propellant HFA 134a salbutamol sulfate metered-dose inhaler in patients with asthma

STUDY OBJECTIVE: This study compares the safety and efficacy of HFA 134a salbutamol sulfate (Airomir in the 3M CFC-free system [3M Pharmaceuticals]) and CFC 11/12 salbutamol (Ventolin [Allen & Hanburys]) in a cumulative dose-response (1, 1, 2, 4, 8 inhalations at 30-min intervals) study in asthmatic patients. DESIGN: Randomized, single-blind, two-period cross-over study. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-four stable mild to moderate asthmatics. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: At all cumulative inhalations, the changes in FEV1 (absolute, percent, and percent predicted) and FVC were equivalent. There was also no significant difference in heart rate, serum potassium level, BP, 12-lead ECG, Holter monitor recordings, or adverse events. Both HFA 134a salbutamol sulfate and CFC 11/12 salbutamol displayed a significant dose-response for FEV1, FEF25-75%, FVC, serum potassium, heart rate, and systolic BP. CONCLUSIONS: HFA 134a salbutamol sulfate and CFC 11/12 salbutamol produced clinically and statistically similar airway responses and side effects. These results indicate that HFA 134a salbutamol sulfate would be a safe and effective substitute for CFC 11/12 salbutamol.     

Inhaler therapy for adults with obstructive lung diseases: powder or aerosol?

When prescribing inhalation medication in the ambulant treatment of patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), a choice can be made between dry powder inhaler (DPI) and pressurized metered dose inhalers (pMDI). The degree of deposition in the lower airways depends on the dose delivery via the inhaler and the mean diameter of the released particles (MMAD). With a DPI, dose delivery and MMAD depend on the inspiratory flow rate. With a pMDI dose delivery and MMAD do not depend on the inspiratory flow rate but on hand-mouth co-ordination. The main determinants for the choice of a DPI or a pMDI are the degree of co-operation and co-ordination, and the inspiratory flow rate of the patient.     

In vitro performance of three combinations of spacers and pressurized metered dose inhalers for treatment in children

The performance of pressurized metered dose inhalers (pMDIs) and spacers in correct dose recommendations is important, but limited information on dose delivery and fine-particle dose from different combinations of spacers and pMDIs is available. In this study, three combinations of spacers and pMDIs were investigated: NebuChamber and AeroChamber with budesonide pMDI and Babyhaler with fluticasone propionate pMDI. Doses were withdrawn onto a filter either with a breathing simulator (dose to ventilator) or with constant flow (maximal dose). The fine-particle dose was assessed with a cascade impactor (Andersen Sampler). The effect of repeated use and cleaning of the spacers on the passive fallout of aerosol within the spacers was determined by evacuating the dose on a filter 2, 5, 10 and 30 s after actuating the spray. The drugs were quantified by liquid chromatography. The NebuChamber delivered the highest doses, both maximal dose and dose to ventilator. The recovered doses (means+/-SD) were 55+/-6% and 51+/-2%, respectively, of the delivered dose from the pMDI. The corresponding results for the Babyhaler were 41+/-7% and 24+/-4% and for the Aerochamber 27+/-3% and 17+/-3%. The passive fallout of aerosol, determined as half-life (t1/2) was around approximately 30 s for the NebuChamber, 9-15 s for the Babyhaler and approximately 10 s for the AeroChamber. The present study confirms that there are significant differences in dose output from different combinations of pressurized metered dose inhalers and spacers, with the NebuChamber giving the highest dose, both as delivered dose and in droplets <4.7 microm. Interactions with the spacer material, dead space in the inspiratory line and entrainment of air during inhalation due to inefficient valve control could account for these differences.     

Respiratory response to salbutamol (albuterol) in ventilator-dependent infants with chronic lung disease: pressurized aerosol delivery versus intravenous injection

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of intravenously injected with inhaled salbutamol in ventilator dependent infants with chronic lung disease (CLD). DESIGN: Prospective randomized study which each patient served as his/her own control. SETTING: Multidisciplinary neonatal and pediatric ICU. PATIENTS: 8 ventilator dependent premature infants with CLD. INTERVENTIONS: Salbutamol, 10 micrograms/kg was given intravenously, and 10-19 h later, twice 100 micrograms as pressurized aerosol, or vice versa, sequence randomized. The pressurized aerosol was delivered by a metered dose inhaler into a newly developed aerosol holding chamber, integrated into the inspiratory limb of the patient circuit. Respiratory system mechanics were assessed by the single breath occlusion method before and 10 and 60 min after drug administration. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Compliance improved significantly after intravenous injection (0.48 +/- 0.18 to 0.67 +/- 0.16, p < 0.01 and 0.59 +/- 0.23 ml/cmH2O/kg, NS, (mean +/- 1 SD) and after inhalation (0.46 +/- 0.19 to 0.64 +/- 0.32, p < 0.01 and 0.56 +/- 0.31 ml/cmH2O/kg, NS). Resistance decreased after iv. use (0.38 +/- 0.17 to 0.25 +/- 0.11, p < 0.001 and 0.25 +/- 0.10 cmH2O/ml/s, NS) and after inhalation (0.35 +/- 0.12 to 0.27 +/- 0.09, p < 0.01 and 0.28 +/- 0.12 cmH2O/ml/s, NS). Heart rate increased significantly after both routes of application, whereas mean arterial pressure, respirator settings, FIO2, transcutaneous SO2 and capillary PCO2 did not change. CONCLUSIONS: Inhaled and intravenous salbutamol improves pulmonary mechanics to the same extent with comparable side effects, and may therefore be used to facilitate weaning from respirators.     

Postmarketing surveillance study of a non-chlorofluorocarbon inhaler according to the safety assessment of marketed medicines guidelines

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety of a non-chlorofluorocarbon metered dose salbutamol inhaler. DESIGN: This was a postmarketing surveillance study, conducted under formal guidelines for company sponsored safety assessment of marketed medicines (SAMM). A non-randomised, non-interventional, observational design compared patients prescribed metered doses of salbutamol delivered by inhalers using either hydrofluoroalkane or chlorofluorocarbon as the propellant. Follow up was three months. SETTING: 646 general practices throughout the United Kingdom. SUBJECTS: 6614 patients with obstructive airways disease (1667 patient years of exposure). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportions of patients who were: admitted to hospital for respiratory diseases, reported adverse side effects, or withdrew because of adverse affects. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the hydrofluoroalkane (HFA 134a) and chlorofluorocarbon inhaler groups in relation to the proportions of patients admitted to hospital for respiratory diseases (odds ratio 0.75; 95% confidence interval 0.51 to 1.08) or the proportions who reported adverse events (1.01; 0.88 to 1.17). However, more patients using the hydrofluoroalkane inhaler than the chlorofluorocarbon inhaler withdrew because of adverse events (3.8% and 0.9% respectively). CONCLUSION: The hydrofluoroalkane inhaler was as safe as the chlorofluorocarbon inhaler when judged by hospital admissions and adverse affects. The study design successfully fulfilled the recommendations of the guidelines. Differences between postmarketing surveillance studies and randomised clinical trials in assessing safety were identified. These may lead to difficulties in the design of postmarketing surveillance studies.