Early phase II study of KRN8602 (MX2), a novel anthracycline derivative for acute leukemia

We performed an early phase II study of KRN8602, a new anthracycline derivative for refractory or relapsed acute leukemias. KRN8602 was given at a dose of 15 mg/m2 for 3 to 5 consecutive days, repeating every 3-4 weeks. Among 53 patients entered in the study, 51 were evaluable for safety, and 46 were evaluable for efficacy. The response rate at schedules of 3 and 4 consecutive days was 9.1% (1 PR/11), while that at a schedule of 5 consecutive days was 22.9% (3 CR + 5 PR/35). With the 5 consecutive day schedule, the response rates were 21.4% (1 CR + 2 PR/14) for acute myelogenous leukemia and 29.4% (2 CR + 3 PR/17) for acute lymphocytic leukemia, but no response was observed in 4 patients with blastic crisis of chronic myelogenous leukemia. Major toxicities were nausea/vomiting and anorexia, however, all these toxicities were clinically manageable. From these results it is concluded that KRN8602 is effective against acute leukemias, and the optimal dose is 15 mg/m2 for 5 consecutive days.     

Purification and characterization of human sarcomeric mitochondrial creatine kinase

PURPOSE: A dose-escalation study of irinotecan hydrochloride (CPT-11) combined with fixed-dose cisplatin was conducted to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities, and objective response rate in patients with advanced gastric cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-four patients with or without prior chemotherapy were enrolled. All patients were assessable for toxicities and response. On day 1, CPT-11 was administered as a 90-minute intravenous (I.V.) infusion, which was followed 2 hours later by a 120-minute I.V. infusion of cisplatin 80 mg/m2. CPT-11 alone at the same dose was administered again on day 15. The treatment was repeated every 4 weeks until disease progression was observed. The initial dose of CPT-11 was 60 mg/m2, and was escalated in increments of 10 mg/m2 until severe or life-threatening toxicity was observed. RESULTS: The MTD of this combination was CPT-11 80 mg/m2. At this dose level, 16.7% of patients (two of 12) had leukopenia of less than 1,000/microL, 66.7% (eight of 12) had neutropenia of less than 500/microL, and 16.7% (two of 12) had severe diarrhea of grade 4 during the first course. The dose-limiting toxicity was neutropenia. Ten patients achieved a partial response (PR), and the overall response rate was 41.7% among 24 patients (95% confidence interval, 21.9% to 61.4%). CONCLUSION: The recommended dose and schedule is CPT-11 70 mg/m2 on days 1 and 15 and cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 1 every 4 weeks. This combination of CPT-11 and cisplatin, considered to be active against advanced gastric cancer with acceptable toxicity, should be further assessed in a phase II study.     

Treatment of lung metastases from malignant melanoma with IL-2 inhalation therapy

Seven patients with pulmonary metastases of malignant melanoma were treated with inhalation therapy with 36 million IU interleukin-2 for six months. Inhalation therapy was combined with four bolus infusions of DTIC at a dose of 850 mg/m2 once every four weeks. Response rates were 71.4% with 2 patients achieving a complete remission (CR), 2 partial remissions (PR), 1 stable disease (SD), and 2 progressing disease (PD). Therapy was well tolerated with low toxicity. Six of the patients developed cough; one patient was slightly feverish. We conclude that inhalation therapy of lung metastases is a promising addition to the therapeutic arsenal against malignant melanoma.     

Treatment of relapsed adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia with fludarabine and cytosine arabinoside followed by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (FLAG-GCSF)

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of the combination of fludarabine 30/mg/m2 + cytarabine 2g/m2 followed by the administration of G-CSF to achieve a complete remission (CR) in patients with relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). We treated twelve patients in first relapse, overall 10 patients achieved a second CR, one patient showed resistant disease and one patient died during remission induction. The regimen was well tolerated and we observed a short period of neutropenia with a low incidence of myelosuppression-associated problems. Eight patients in second CR received the same chemotherapeutic regimen as consolidation used for the reinduction. In six patients the chemotherapeutic regimen was well tolerated, two patients died, (cerebral hemorrhage in one patient and sepsis in the other). In conclusion the combination of fludarabine, cytarabine and G-CSF has significant antileukemic activity and non hematological toxicities were acceptable. The addition of G-CSF reduced the period of neutropenia obtaining a low incidence of myelosuppression-associated problems.     

Phase I and pharmacologic study of the combination paclitaxel and carboplatin as first-line chemotherapy in stage III and IV ovarian cancer

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose for the combination paclitaxel and carboplatin administered every 4 weeks and to gain more insight into the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of this combination in previously untreated ovarian cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-five chemotherapy-naive patients with suboptimally debulked stage III (tumor masses > 3 cm) and stage IV ovarian cancer were entered onto this phase I trial in which paclitaxel was administered as a 3-hour intravenous (IV) infusion at dosages of 125 to 225 mg/m2 immediately followed by carboplatin over 30 minutes at dosages of 300 to 600 mg/m2. A total of six courses was planned, followed by a second-look laparoscopy/laparotomy. Patients with a response and/or minimal residual disease at second-look laparoscopy received three additional courses. Twenty-six patients participated in the pharmacokinetic part of the study. RESULTS: The most important hematologic toxicity encountered was neutropenia. Neutropenia was more pronounced for the higher dose levels (DLs) and was cumulative. Thrombocytopenia was mild in the first eight DLs, but increased during the treatment courses. Nonhematologic toxicities consisted mainly of vomiting, neuropathy, fatigue, rash, pruritus, myalgia, and arthralgia. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) in this trial were neutropenic fever, thrombocytopenia that required platelet transfusions, and cumulative neuropathy. Of 33 patients assessable for response, 26 major responders (78%, 20 complete response [CR] and six partial response [PR]) were documented. The maximal concentration (Cmax) of paclitaxel and the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) were not different from the historical data for paclitaxel as a single agent. Retrospective analysis using a modified Calvert formula showed that the measured carboplatin AUCs in plasma ultrafiltrate (pUF) were 30% +/- 3.4% less than the calculated carboplatin AUC. Neutropenia was more pronounced than could be expected on the basis of the historical times above a threshold concentration greater than 0.1 mumol/L (T > or = 0.1 mumol/L) or 0.05 mumol/L (T > or = 0.05 mumol/L), and thrombocytopenia was less than could be expected from historical sigmoidal Emax models. CONCLUSION: The combination of paclitaxel 200 mg/ m2 and carboplatin 550 mg/m2 every 4 weeks is a well-tolerated treatment modality. The paclitaxel-carboplatin combination is highly active in stage III (bulky) and stage IV ovarian cancer. No indications for a pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction between carboplatin and paclitaxel were found.     

Differential effects of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor blockade on nociceptive somatic and visceral reflexes

OBJECTIVE: A Phase I study was conducted to determine the safety, toxicity, and maximum tolerated dose of preirradiation chemotherapy using carmustine (BCNU) and cisplatin in the treatment of high-grade gliomas. METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed high-grade gliomas received BCNU and cisplatin after surgery, both before and during definitive radiation therapy. Preirradiation chemotherapy consisted of an administration of 40 mg/m2 BCNU on Days 1 through 3 and 30 mg/m2 cisplatin on Days 1 through 3 and 29 through 31 and repeated at 8 weeks to coincide with the start of radiation therapy. Postradiation chemotherapy consisted of an administration of 200 mg/m2 BCNU once every 8 weeks for four cycles. Radiation therapy consisted of 160-cGy fractions administered twice daily for 15 days, yielding a total dose of 4800 cGy. Dose escalation of BCNU was planned. If hematological toxicity was mild, the dose of cisplatin was to be held constant and BCNU dose escalated to 50 mg/m2 on Days 1 through 3. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were studied. The hematological toxicity was dose-limiting. Grade 3 or 4 leukopenia occurred in each of 10 patients (56%), and Grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia occurred in each of 9 patients (50%). Other toxicities included anorexia (94%), nausea (83%), emesis (33%), alopecia (94%), mild ototoxicity (50%), and, in one patient, death as a result of BCNU pulmonary toxicity. The median survival time was 14 months. Objective responses occurred in 45% of the patients evaluable for response. The maximum tolerated dose of this combination was 50 mg/m2 BCNU on Days 1 through 3 and 30 mg/m2 cisplatin on Days 1 through 3 and 29 through 31 before radiation and repeated in 8 weeks to coincide with the start of radiation. CONCLUSION: This schedule of the preirradiation administration of BCNU and cisplatin with accelerated hyper-fractionated radiation therapy for the treatment of high-grade gliomas provides a less toxic alternative to that of previous studies of preirradiation chemotherapy with these agents and merits further investigation.     

Phase II study of continuous infusion carmustine and cisplatin followed by cranial irradiation in adults with newly diagnosed high-grade astrocytoma

PURPOSE: To evaluate the activity and toxicity of carmustine (BCNU) and cisplatin administered as a 72-hour continuous intravenous infusion before radiation in adults with newly diagnosed high-grade astrocytomas. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-two patients with a Karnofsky performance status greater than 60 and no prior antineoplastic therapy entered this protocol. The median age of the patients was 55 years. Eighty-eight percent had glioblastoma multiforme and 12% had anaplastic astrocytomas. BCNU (40 mg/m2/d) and cisplatin (40 mg/m2/d) were administered concurrently as a 72-hour infusion every 3 to 4 weeks. Radiation was begun 4 weeks after the third cycle of chemotherapy or earlier for progressive disease. Responses required a > or = 50% reduction in contrast-enhancing volume. RESULTS: Forty patients (77%) completed three chemotherapy infusions, five (10%) received two infusions, and seven (13%) received only one. Fifty-one patients completed radiation. Seventeen (42%) patients with measurable disease had a partial response (PR) to chemotherapy, 23 (53%) had stable disease (SD), and two (4%) had progressive disease (PD) on chemotherapy. The median survival time for all patients was 13 months. Survival rates at 1, 2, 3, and 5 years were 62%, 19%, 12%, and 5%, respectively. Grade III to IV leukopenia occurred in 32% of patients; 63% received platelet transfusions and 58% required RBCs. Neutropenic fevers were rare and no intracranial hemorrhages or treatment-related deaths were noted. Nausea, vomiting, peripheral neuropathy, hearing loss, and thromboembolic events were relatively common. CONCLUSION: This chemotherapy regimen appears to have significant activity and may prolong survival in adults with newly diagnosed high-grade astrocytoma.     

Efficient immunocastration of male piglets by immunoneutralization of GnRH using a new GnRH-like peptide

BACKGROUND: DTIC and interleukin-2 (IL-2), as single agents, have a limited anti-tumor activity in patients with metastatic melanoma. Experimentally, thymosin alpha 1 (TA1) may modulate the action of IL-2. We investigated the clinical and immunological effects of a combination with these three agents. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-six patients with measurable metastatic melanoma were treated with DTIC 850 mg IV on day 1, TA1 2 mg s.c. on days 4 to 7, and IL-2 18 MU/m2/d by continuous intravenous infusion on days 8 to 12. Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Objective responses were obtained in 15 (36%) of 42 evaluable patients (CI at 95%: 22%-50%). Two patients experienced complete responses, and stable disease was observed in five. The median time to progression was 5.5 months and median survival was 11 months. Side effects were predominantly caused by IL-2. Treatment was tolerated reasonably well, and there was no overlapping toxicity or interference between chemotherapy and biotherapy. Baseline sCD4 levels seem to correlate to tumor burden. Patients benefiting from treatment had lower sCD4 and higher sCD8 than did progressing patients. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of DTIC + TA1 + IL-2 is active in the treatment of advanced melanoma, with acceptable toxicity. However, even more active regimens are needed, and the interactions between thymic hormones and cytokines should be further explored.     

Assessing the reliability and responsiveness of 5 shoulder questionnaires

Inspired by the high response rates achieved with the DBCT regimen (dacarbazine [DTIC], carmustine [BCNU], cisplatin and tamoxifen [TAM]), we administered the nitrosourea compound fotemustine, cisplatin and TAM (FCT regimen) to 69 patients with metastatic melanoma. Fotemustine (100 mg/m2) and cisplatin (100 mg/m2) were administered every 4 weeks, preceded by TAM 160 mg daily for 7 days from the second course onwards. Pharmacokinetic blood sampling was performed in 14 patients during the initial two cycles to compare the pharmacokinetic behaviour of fotemustine with or without TAM. Previous chemo- or radiotherapy was allowed, and patients with brain metastases or concomitant other malignancies were included. Four complete and 11 partial responders were observed among 66 evaluable patients, yielding a response rate of 22.7% (95% confidence interval 12.9 32.5%). The median survival time was 6.4 months (range 0.1-52+ months). The main toxicities were thrombocytopenia, protracted nausea/vomiting and ototoxicity. Renal toxicity was generally mild, but possibly contributed to two deaths. Seven patients experienced deep venous thrombosis during the study. TAM had no influence on the pharmacokinetics of fotemustine. The activity of the FCT regimen was clearly inferior to that initially reported with DBCT treatment. However, a recent publication concludes that the latter achieves a considerably lower response rate when administered to a larger patient group. We believe our results reflect the true activity of FCT and similar regimens when administered routinely to unselected patients. Considering the number of potentially serious side effects, we cannot recommend the moderately active FCT regimen as a palliative treatment option for melanoma patients.     

Development of a biochemotherapy regimen with concurrent administration of cisplatin, vinblastine, dacarbazine, interferon alfa, and interleukin-2 for patients with metastatic melanoma

PURPOSE: To evaluate the antitumor activity and toxicity of concurrent biochemotherapy that uses cisplatin, vinblastine, and docarbazine (DTIC) (CVD) in combination with interferon alfa-2a (IFN-alpha) and interleukin-2 (IL-2) in patients with metastatic melanoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between October 1992 and October 1993, 53 patients with a documented diagnosis of metastatic melanoma with measurable lesions and an Eastern Oncology Cooperative Group (ECOG) performance status of 2 or less were enrolled onto this study. Patients were required to have no clinically significant cardiac dysfunction and to be free from symptomatic brain metastases. The treatment consisted of cisplatin 20 mg/m2 daily for 4 days; vinblastine 1.6 mg/m2 daily for 4 days; and DTIC 800 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) day 1 with IL-2 9 x 10(6) IU/m2 i.v. by continuous infusion daily for 4 days and IFN-alpha 5 x 10(6) U/m2 subcutaneously daily for 5 days, repeated at 21-day intervals. Response was assessed after two cycles and patients who responded were continued on treatment for a total of six cycles. RESULTS: Among 53 assessable patients, 11 patients (21%) achieved a complete response (CR) and 23 patients (43%) achieved a partial response (PR), for an overall objective response rate of 64%. The median time to disease progression for all patients was 5 months. The median survival of all patients entered onto the trial was 11.8 months. Among the 11 patients who achieved a CR, five patients (9%) have remained in continuous CR for 50+ to 61+ months. The toxicity of biochemotherapy consisted of severe myelosuppression, significant nausea and vomiting, and moderately severe hypotension that required inpatient hospital care for each 5-day cycle of treatment. There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSION: Concurrent biochemotherapy for patients with advanced melanoma is capable of producing high CR and overall response rates and resulted in durable complete remissions in a small fraction of patients. Toxicity, although severe, was manageable in a routine inpatient hospital environment.     

Randomized phase II trial of BCDT [carmustine (BCNU), cisplatin, dacarbazine (DTIC) and tamoxifen] with or without interferon alpha (IFN-alpha) and interleukin (IL-2) in patients with metastatic melanoma

The purpose of this study was to evaluate in a randomized phase II trial the efficacy and toxicity of combination biochemotherapy compared with chemotherapy alone in patients with metastatic melanoma. Sixty-five patients with metastatic melanoma (ECOG performance status 0 or 1) were randomized to receive intravenous BCNU 100 mg m(-2) (day 1, alternate courses), cisplatin 25 mg m(-2) (days 1-3), DTIC 220 mg m(-2) (days 1-3) and oral tamoxifen 40 mg (BCDT regimen) with (n = 35) or without (n = 30) subcutaneous interleukin 2 (IL-2) 18 x 10(6) iu t.d.s. (day - 2), 9 x 10(6) iu b.d. (day - 1 and 0) and interferon 2 alpha (IFN-alpha) 9 MU (days 1-3). Evidence for immune activation was determined by flow cytometric analysis of peripheral blood lymphocytes. Treatment was repeated every 4 weeks up to six courses depending on response. The overall response rate of BCDT with IL-2/IFN-alpha was 23% [95% confidence interval (CI) 10-40%] with one complete response (CR) and seven partial responses (PR), and for BCDT alone 27% (95% CI 12-46%) with eight PRs; the median durations of response were 2.8 months and 2.5 months respectively. Sites of response were similar in both groups. There was no difference between the two groups in progression-free survival or overall survival (median survival 5 months for BCDT with IL-2/IFNalpha and 5.5 months for BCDT alone). Although 3 days of subcutaneous IL-2 resulted in significant lymphopenia, evidence of immune activation was indicated by a significant rise in the percentage of CD56- (NK cells) and CD3/HLA-DR-positive (activated T cells) subsets, without any change in the percentage of CD4 or CD4 T-cell subsets. Toxicity assessment revealed a significantly higher incidence of severe thrombocytopenia in patients treated with combination chemotherapy than with chemotherapy alone (37% vs 13%, P = 0.03) and a higher incidence of grade 3/4 flu-like symptoms (20% vs 10%) and fatigue (26% vs 13%). The addition of subcutaneous IL-2 and IFNalpha to BCDT chemotherapy in a randomized phase II trial resulted in immune activation but did not improve response rates in patients with metastatic melanoma, and indeed may increase some treatment-related toxicity.     

Phase I study of docetaxel dose escalation in combination with fixed weekly gemcitabine in patients with advanced malignancies

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose of monthly docetaxel combined with fixed-dose weekly gemcitabine and describe the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of the combination. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with refractory solid tumors were treated with gemcitabine days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks at a fixed dose of 800 mg/m2. Two docetaxel administration schedules were studied, with the drug administered either day 1 or day 15 at doses of 45, 60, 75, and 100 mg/m2 per cycle. RESULTS: Forty patients received 132 cycles of chemotherapy. On the day-1 schedule, the maximum-tolerated docetaxel dose was the highest planned dose of 100 mg/m2 with two DLT episodes among 12 patients treated with 34 cycles at this dose level. On the day-15 schedule, delivery of the planned docetaxel doses was not feasible because of thrombocytopenia and hepatic dysfunction. Hematologic toxicities included grade 4 neutropenia in 16 patients, with three episodes of febrile neutropenia; grades 3 to 4 thrombocytopenia in nine patients; and anemia that required RBC transfusions in 10 patients. For patients treated at the highest docetaxel dose level, myelosuppression was not dose limiting and only one of 34 cycles was complicated by febrile neutropenia. The most common nonhematologic toxicities were asthenia, flu-like symptoms, and fluid retention. Antineoplastic activity was noteworthy, with partial responses in nine of 21 patients with pretreated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC; 43%; 95% confidence interval, 22 to 66), in four of seven patients with breast cancer, and in one patient with esophageal adenocarcinoma. CONCLUSION: Gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 days 1,8, and 15 can be safely combined with docetaxel 100 mg/m2 day 1 of a 28-day cycle. The observed antitumor activity warrants phase II evaluation.     

Phase I trial of docetaxel and cisplatin in previously untreated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated doses (MTDs), principal toxicities, and pharmacokinetics of the combination of docetaxel and cisplatin administered every 3 weeks to patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have not received prior chemotherapy and to recommend a dose for phase II studies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced NSCLC and performance status 0 to 2 who had not received prior chemotherapy received docetaxel over 1 hour followed by cisplatin over 1 hour with hydration. Dose levels studied were (docetaxel/cisplatin) 50/75, 75/75, 75/100, and 100/75 mg/m2 repeated every 3 weeks. Colony-stimulating factor (CSF) support was not used. Pharmacokinetics of docetaxel and cisplatin were studied in the first cycle of therapy. Most patients (79%) had metastatic disease or intrathoracic recurrence after prior radiation and/or surgery. RESULTS: Of 24 patients entered, all were assessable for toxicity and 18 for response. The MTD schedules were docetaxel 75 mg/m2 with cisplatin 100 mg/m2 (dose-limiting toxicities [DLTs] in five of six patients), and docetaxel 100 mg/m2 with cisplatin 75 mg/m2 (DLTs in two of two patients, including one fatal toxicity). Limiting toxicities were febrile neutropenia and nonhematologic, principally diarrhea and renal. Two patients had neutropenic enterocolitis. Pharmacokinetics of both drugs were consistent with results from single-agent studies, which suggests no major pharmacokinetic interaction. Neutropenia was related to docetaxel area under the plasma concentration-versus-time curve (AUC). An alternative schedule was investigated, with cisplatin being administered over 3 hours commencing 3 hours after docetaxel, but toxicity did not appear to be less. Independently reviewed responses occurred in eight of 18 patients (44%; 95% confidence interval, 22% to 69%), most following 75 mg/m2 of both drugs. CONCLUSION: Docetaxel 75 mg/m2 over 1 hour followed by cisplatin 75 mg/m2 over 1 hour is recommended for phase II studies. The responses seen in this phase I study suggest a high degree of activity of this combination in previously untreated advanced NSCLC.     

Efficacy and tolerance of vinorelbine and fluorouracil combination as first-line chemotherapy of advanced breast cancer: results of a phase II study using a sequential group method

PURPOSE: To assess the antitumor efficacy and safety profile of the combination of Fluorouracil (5FU) and vinorelbine given as first-line therapy to patients with advanced breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: As defined in the seven consecutive steps of a phase II group sequential design, 63 patients received 5FU 750 mg/m2/d for 5 consecutive days as a continuous infusion and vinorelbine 30 mg/ m2 on days 1 and 5 as a short intravenous (I/V) infusion every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Forty-one of 63 patients achieved an objective response, which allowed us to discontinue the study and reject a response rate less than 50% with a statistical power of 90%. The unbiased estimate of the response rate was 61.6%. Response rate did not differ significantly according to the following: (1) type of prior adjuvant therapy (none, n = 23; without anthracycline, n = 6; with anthracyline, n = 34); (2) site of metastatic disease; and (3) number of metastatic sites. The median time to progression was 8.4 months. The median response duration was 12.3 months, and the median duration of complete response (CR), from the first assessment of CR, was 7.3 months. The median overall survival time was 23 months (28.1 months for patients with a CR). The main toxicities (grades 3 and 4) were neutropenia (90% of patients), infection (12.7%), mucositis (37%), and constipation (9.5%). Nevertheless, treatment could be given on an outpatient basis to the majority of patients, and the median relative dose-intensity was 86%. CONCLUSION: This phase II study, which used a group-sequential design, shows that the combination of 5FU and vinorelbine is an active and tolerable regimen for the treatment of first metastatic progression of breast cancer. It provides an alternative regimen for patients who have previously received anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy or in whom anthracyclines cannot be used.     

Randomized study of zorubicin versus zorubicin-cisplatin in undifferentiated carcinoma of the nasopharynx (UCNT)

BACKGROUND: The most active chemotherapy regimens in UCNT were those combining anthracyclines (doxorubicin or epirubicin) and cisplatin. Our previous pilot study on 37 patients treated with the zorubicin-cisplatin combination with a RR of 67% and literature data about other anthracyclines such as epirubicin achieving a response rate of over 50% were the basis of this randomized study comparing efficacy and toxicity of the combination vs. zorubicin as monotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 80 patients entered the study. The diagnosis of UCNT was confirmed by two independent pathologists. All patients had their primary tumors in the nasopharynx. The patients were randomized in two groups: group A (zorubicin 325 mg/m2, day 1), and group B (zorubicin 250 mg/m2, day 1 and cisplatin 30 mg/m2, days 2-5). The inter-cycle interval was four weeks. The two groups were well balanced according to sex, age, stage Ho and TNM stage. RESULTS: Group A: 40 patients included, 34/40 evaluable for activity. Activity on evaluable patient basis: CR 4/34 (11.75%), PR 4/34, SD 14/34, PD 12/34, response rate 8/34 (23.5%); response rate on intent to treat basis 8/40 (20%). Toxicity: granulocytopenia grade 3-4 6/40, thrombocytopenia grade 3-4 2/40, no febrile neutropenias, nausea/vomiting any grade 3/40, cardiac toxicity any grade (rhythm) 3/40 other toxicities minor or absent. Group B: 40 patients included, 36/40 evaluable for activity. Activity on evaluable patient basis: CR 10/36 (27.78%), PR 17/36, SD 3/36, PD 6/36, response rate 27/36 (75%); response rate on intent to treat basis 27/40 (67.5%). Toxicity: granulocytopenia grade 3-4 10/40, thrombocytopenia grade 3-4 8/40, two febrile neutropenias, nausea/vomiting any grade 13/40, other toxicities mild or absent. Of the group of patients achieving a CR, four relapsed following 7, 11, 22 and 23 months, one was lost to follow-up, one died after six months from fulminant hepatitis B and eight are in complete remission lasting for 30+ to 66+ months. Following CR achievement none received any consolidation radiotherapy, and the projected five years of freedom from relapse for complete responders is about 60%. CONCLUSION: Zorubicin is an effective drug in UCNT and its combination with cisplatin has a significant activity and an acceptable toxicity.     

Phase I study of daily times five topotecan and single injection of cisplatin in patients with previously untreated non-small-cell lung carcinoma

BACKGROUND: The objectives were to determine the dose-limiting toxicity of topotecan in combination with cisplatin, to describe the principal toxicities, and to define the maximally-tolerated doses of the drugs in previously untreated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study was designed to evaluate escalated doses of topotecan (starting at 0.75 mg/m2/day) as a 30-minute infusion daily for five consecutive days with a fixed clinically-relevant dose of 75 mg/m2 cisplatin given on day 1, every three weeks. RESULTS: Fifteen chemotherapy-naive patients entered the study and 14 were evaluable for toxicity. All 11 patients treated at the first topotecan/cisplatin dose level of 0.75/75 mg/m2, experienced at least one episode of grade 4 neutropenia. For six patients, absolute neutrophil counts were below 500/ml for more than five days, and two of them developed a grade 4 thrombocytopenia. At the next higher topotecan/cisplatin dose level (1.0/75 mg/m2), grade 4 neutropenia lasting longer than five days occurred in all three evaluable patients, including one patient who expired due to a severe neutropenia associated with sepsis. Non-hematologic toxicities, predominantly nausea and vomiting, were mild to moderate in severity and manageable. Four patients had partial responses (30.7%; 95% confidence interval (9%-61%) of relatively short duration. CONCLUSION: Both severe neutropenia and thrombocytopenia precluded dose escalation of topotecan and cisplatin administered on this schedule. In previously untreated patients, the first topotecan/cisplatin dose level (0.75/75 mg/m2), was associated with intolerable myelosuppression, and, therefore, the dose levels evaluated in this study cannot be recommended for subsequent phase II investigations. The high toxicity of this schedule and the recent understanding of the pharmacokinetic interaction between those drugs may encourage the investigation of the alternate sequence of cisplatin after TPT in phase II studies.     

Molecular basis for thymidine modulation of the efficacy and toxicity of alkylating agents

The antitumor activity of 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea (BCNU) in mice previously was shown to be markedly enhanced by co-administration of thymidine. We have examined the cellular mechanisms underlying the augmentation effect of thymidine. It was found that thymidine did not increase the cytotoxicity of BCNU for B16/F10 melanoma or L1210 leukemia cells in vitro. Instead, thymidine appeared to augment the activity of tumor-specific cytotoxic T-cells in tumor-bearing mice, which specifically rejected a secondary challenge with the B16/F10 tumor. Thus, development of an antitumor immune response is facilitated by thymidine in BCNU-induced immunosuppressed mice. These preclinical studies suggested that combination therapy with alkylating agents and thymidine may be a more efficacious and less toxic anticancer therapy. The potential efficacy of the sequential administration of dacarbazine (DTIC), BCNU, and thymidine in patients with advanced malignant melanoma was investigated. As predicted from animal studies, sequential administration of DTIC, BCNU, and thymidine is a relatively nontoxic therapy for metastatic melanoma. This treatment induced durable responses in up to 35% of patients, and hence is superior to many commonly used toxic combination chemotherapies. The mechanism of action, although not well characterized, is thought to be mediated through protection of the cellular immune process, as well as organ function, from alkylating agent toxicity through modulation of DNA repair enzymes such as O(6)-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase in normal tissue. Thus, thymidine is a biomodulator, which not only protects patients from hematologic, pulmonary, and hepatic toxicities associated with DTIC and BCNU chemotherapy, but also potentiates therapeutic efficacy.     

Phase II trial of cisplatin and gemcitabine in advanced squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the toxicity profile and efficacy of cisplatin combined with gemcitabine in patients with irresectable locally recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Gemcitabine was given at a dose of 800 mg/m2 on days 1, 8 and 15, plus cisplatin at a dose of 50 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8; every four weeks. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients with a median age of 59 years (range 42-74) were included. All patients were evaluable for toxicity and 22 patients were assessable for response. Eleven cases had advanced recurrent locoregional disease while 13 patients had metastatic disease. One CR (4.7%) and four PR (18%) were observed, for an overall response rate of 22.7% (95% CI: 8%-42%). The main toxicity was hematological: neutropenia grade 3-4 in 28% of the cycles and thrombocytopenia grade 3-4 in 16%. The most significant non-hematological toxicity was asthenia grade 2-3 in 24% of the cycles. CONCLUSIONS: This cisplatin plus gemcitabine combination schedule has a favourable toxicity profile with a discrete activity in patients with locally recurrent or metastatic squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck.     

Double level fractures of the femur treated with closed intramedullary nailing

Breast cancer patients receiving tamoxifen (Tam) are at an increased risk for developing endometrial carcinomas, possibly due to the partial estrogenic effect of Tam on endometrial cells. Progestational therapy has not routinely been included in Tam regimens. It was our aim to determine the presence of estrogen receptors (ERs) and progesterone receptors (PRs) in normal and abnormal endometria from postmenopausal women with breast cancer who were treated with Tam. Standard immunohistochemical staining of ERs and PRs was performed on paraffin sections from formalin-fixed uterine curettings or hysterectomy specimens from 40 patients who had received 20-40 mg of Tam daily for a minimum of 3 months. For comparison, normal endometria from 20 women who had not received Tam (11 premenopausal, 9 postmenopausal) were also studied for ER and PR expression. Staining was evaluated using semiquantitative immunoreactivity scores (IRS) ranging from 0 (negative) to 12 (strongly positive). In the group of patients receiving Tam, ERs and PRs were detected in the nuclei of glandular cells in 24/24 cases of endometrial atrophy (ER/PR-IRS, 2-12), in 8/8 endometrial polyps (ER-IRS, 6-12; PR-IRS, 4-12), in 4/4 adenomatous endometrial hyperplasias (ER-IRS, 3-8; PR-IRS, 1-12), and in 4/4 well-differentiated endometrioid adenocarcinomas (ER-IRS, 2-12; PR-IRS, 6-8). Of the 11 endometria from premenopausal patients who had not received Tam, 8 were ER+/PR+ (ER-IRS, 1-12; PR-IRS, 1-12), 1 was ER+/PR- (ER-IRS, 3; PR-IRS, 0), 1 was ER-/PR+ (ER-IRS, 0; PR-IRS, 2), and 1 was ER-/PR- (ER/PR-IRS, 0). Among 9 atrophic endometria from women not treated with Tam, 6 were ER+/PR+ (ER-IRS, 4-12; PR-IRS, 3-6), 1 was ER+/PR- (ER-IRS, 4; PR-IRS, 0), and 2 were ER-/PR- (ER/PR-IRS, 0). The consistent finding of ER and PR expression in endometria from postmenopausal women receiving Tam further supports the suspected estrogenic effect exerted by Tam on endometrial cells. Progestational therapy could be beneficial in the prevention of Tam-induced abnormal endometrial proliferations.     

Combination phase I/II study of irinotecan hydrochloride (CPT-11) and carboplatin in relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. CPT-11/Lymphoma Study Group

Irinotecan hydrochloride (CPT-11) is a new derivative of camptothecin which inhibits topoisomerase I. Phase II studies have demonstrated that CPT-11 is active against a broad spectrum of neoplasms including intractable non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. An early phase II study in lymphoma suggested that a schedule of daily infusions of 40 mg/m2/day for three or five consecutive days is more effective than a single infusion of 200 mg/m2 every three to four weeks. Carboplatin is also an active agent against lymphoma, and preclinical studies have shown that CPT-11 and its active metabolite have a synergistic effect with platinum compounds. To evaluate the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) and the therapeutic efficacy of CPT-11 in combination with carboplatin in relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, we conducted a combination phase I/II study. The starting dose of CPT-11 was 20 mg/m2/day (days 1 through 3 and 8 through 10), and dose escalations of 5 mg/m2/day increments were planned, with a fixed dose of carboplatin (300 mg/m2, day 1). Six of the eight patients receiving both agents at the starting dose level developed critical toxicities such as grade 4 hematologic (neutropenia 6/8, thrombocytopenia 1/8) and grade 3 non-hematologic toxicities (diarrhea 2/8, transaminase elevation 1/8). Further dose escalation of CPT-11 was halted, and the starting doses were judged to be the MTDs. The response rate (25%, 2/8) to the combination of the MTDs was not superior to that of CPT-11 alone in a previous phase II study (38%, 26/69), and the MTD of CPT-11 in combination with carboplatin was less than half the single-agent dose. We conclude that carboplatin is not recommendable for combination with CPT-11 in lymphoma patients. Other suitable agents for such a combination should be sought.