Retinoic acid enhances fibrinolytic activity in-vivo by enhancing tissue type plasminogen activator (t-PA) activity and inhibits venous thrombosis

BACKGROUND: Simvastatin and pravastatin are both competitive inhibitors of the rate limiting enzyme for cholesterol biosynthesis (HMG CoA) reductase, but data from individual clinical trials suggest significant differences in potency for cholesterol reduction between the two drugs. AIM: To assess any differences in efficacy and safety between simvastatin and pravastatin in a direct, comparative study. METHODS: A double-blind, double-dummy, randomised study design was used, involving 48 patients with primary hypercholesterolaemia. Following a 6 week placebo baseline period, patients were randomly allocated to treatment with either simvastatin or pravastatin, commencing at a dose of 10 mg daily. The dose levels were titrated up to the recommended maximum effective dose of 40 mg daily at 6 weekly intervals if LDL cholesterol levels remained > or = 3.4 mmol/L. After 18 weeks of therapy, all patients were transferred to simvastatin therapy for a further 6 weeks, continuing at their week 18 dose level. Patients complied with a standard lipid lowering diet (containing < 30% of energy as total fat) throughout the study period. RESULTS: Over the 18 week direct comparison of the two drugs, there was a significant difference (p < 0.001) in response between simvastatin and pravastatin for reduction in levels of total cholesterol (32% vs 21% respectively), LDL cholesterol (38% vs 27%) and apolipoprotein B levels (34% vs 23%). No significant difference in drug effect was seen for the small reduction in levels of apolipoprotein AI (5% vs 6% respectively), nor for the increased levels of apolipoprotein AII (14% vs 11%) and HDL cholesterol (11% vs 7%). Lp(a) levels remained unchanged. When pravastatin was replaced with simvastatin for the final 6 weeks of the study in the 23 patients initially randomised to pravastatin, there were further reductions (p < 0.01) in total and LDL cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B. These results establish the advantage of simvastatin over pravastatin in terms of efficacy, for the treatment of primary hypercholesterolaemia.     

Plasma lipoprotein and apolipoprotein levels in Taipei and Framingham

We compared the plasma lipoprotein cholesterol, triglyceride, apolipoprotein (apo) A-I, apoB, and lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] concentrations in a low coronary heart disease (CHD) risk population (n = 440) in Taipei with a high CHD risk population (n = 428) in Framingham matched for age, sex, and menopausal status. Taipei men had significantly lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (-20 mg/dL, -14%, P < .01) and apoB (-7 mg/dL, -6%, P < .05) levels and significantly higher high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels (6 mg/dL, 13%, P < .01) than Framingham men. Taipei women had significantly lower LDL-C (-18 mg/dL, -15%, P < .01) and higher HDL-C (4 mg/dL, 7%, P < .01) levels than Framingham women. Median concentrations and distributions of Lp(a) by sex were similar in Taipei and Framingham. After adjusting for body mass index and smoking status, only differences in total cholesterol and LDL-C levels remained significantly different for both sexes between the two populations (P < .01). Gender differences for lipids within populations were similar. After adjusting for age, body mass index, and smoking status, women in both Taipei and Framingham had significantly lower mean triglyceride, LDL-C, and apoB levels and significantly higher HDL-C and apoA-I levels than men. Postmenopausal women in Taipei had significantly higher mean total cholesterol, LDL-C, HDL-C, apoA-I, apoB, and Lp(a) levels than premenopausal women (P < .05), whereas in Framingham postmenopausal women had significantly higher total cholesterol, triglyceride, LDL-C, and apoB levels than premenopausal women (P < .05). Our data are consistent with the concept that plasma lipoprotein cholesterol levels (especially LDL-C) but not apolipoprotein values explain some of the twofold difference in age-adjusted CHD mortality between these two populations.     

Therapeutic efficiency of lipoprotein(a) reduction by low-density lipoprotein immunoapheresis

This study was performed to investigate the effect of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) immunoapheresis on lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] reduction in patients with heterozygous and homozygous familial hyperlipidemia (N=16) and insufficient response to lipid-lowering agents. By desorption of approximately 5,700+/-500 mL of plasma, a mean reduction in total cholesterol of 62% (P < .001) and in LDL-cholesterol of 70% (P < .001) was achieved. Lp(a), which was elevated at study entry in seven of these patients (82.1+/-34.3 mg/dL; range, 48 to 148 mg/dL), was reduced during the initial LDL-apheresis procedure by 74.8%+/-14.1% (P < .001). Long-term apheresis treatment performed at weekly intervals resulted in an mean reduction in Lp(a) pretreatment values to 39.1+/-28.5 mg/dL (-54%; P < .001). Desorbed Lp(a) was measured at the waste of the columns for 31 apheresis treatments. Lp(a) concentration of the column waste was higher in patients with elevated serum Lp(a) pretreatment values as compared with those with Lp(a) serum values within the normal range (elevated Lp(a), 1,420+/-380 mg; without elevated Lp(a), 235+/-190 mg; P < .001). The rate of return of Lp(a) following apheresis treatment scheduled at weekly intervals was comparable to that of LDL-cholesterol.     

Elevated lipoprotein (a) levels in primary nephrotic syndrome

Elevated plasma levels of total cholesterol and increase in the hepatic synthesis of some apo B-containing lipoproteins have been noted in the nephrotic syndrome. Apoprotein (a), the apolipoprotein distinguishing lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] from low-density lipoprotein, is equally of hepatic origin, and Lp(a) recently has been shown to possess both atherogenic and thrombogenic activities. However, little is known of Lp(a) levels in nephrotic patients. We measured plasma Lp(a) concentrations in 11 patients with primary nephrotic syndrome in the absence of hematuria, hypertension, and renal insufficiency. Histologic lesions were minimal-change disease in five cases, membranous glomerulopathy in four cases, and focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis in two cases. Mean levels of Lp(a) (98 +/- 92 mg/dL [mean +/- SD]) were markedly elevated in the nephrotic patients as compared with the controls (14 +/- 13 mg/dL). No correlation was noted between plasma Lp(a) and proteinuria, albuminemia, total cholesterolemia, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, apoprotein B100, or plasminogen. Furthermore, there was no correlation between Lp(a) levels and apoprotein (a) isoform size. In four patients, the level of Lp(a) decreased approximately fourfold after remission of the nephrotic syndrome under corticosteroid treatment. Our observation that Lp(a) levels are elevated in the nephrotic syndrome is consistent with the hypothesis that these patients may be at an increased risk of cardiovascular and thrombotic complications.     

The science and art of radiation oncology after a century

Troglitazone is a new oral hypoglycemic agent that reduces insulin resistance in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). However, this agent increases serum lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], which is known as an atherogenic lipoprotein. The relationships between the response of Lp(a) to troglitazone and the apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] phenotype were investigated in this study. Nineteen NIDDM patients were treated with troglitazone for 4 weeks. Lp(a) increased significantly from 20.1+/-16.5 mg/dL to 44.1+/-31.9 mg/dL (P<.001) in all study patients. Lp(a) increased from 25.7+/-34.2 mg/dL to 50.1+/-38.7 mg/dL (P = .03) in patients with smaller apo(a) phenotypes (S1S4 to S2S4). Lp(a) also increased from 17.5+/-12.0 mg/dL to 41.3+/-29.6 mg/dL (P<.01) in patients with larger apo(a) phenotypes (S3 to S4). Therefore, the increase of Lp(a) by troglitazone may be independent of the apo(a) phenotype.     

Attenuation of plasma low density lipoprotein cholesterol by select 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors in mice devoid of low density lipoprotein receptors

Low density lipoprotein (LDL) reduction independent of LDL receptor regulation was investigated using HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors in LDL receptor-deficient mice. In males, LDL cholesterol dose-dependently decreased with atorvastatin treatment after 1 week. As untreated mice grew older, their LDL cholesterol progressively rose above basal levels, but was quelled with atorvastatin treatment. In females, atorvastatin treatment time-dependently decreased LDL cholesterol levels and induced hepatic HMG-CoA reductase activity. Unlike males, cholesterol-lowering effects of the drug were sustained in females. Lovastatin, simvastatin, and pravastatin also reduced total and LDL cholesterol; however, additional studies in females demonstrated that atorvastatin caused the greatest dose-dependent and sustained effect after 2 weeks. In females, hepatic HMG-CoA reductase mRNA inversely correlated with LDL cholesterol lowering, with atorvastatin showing the greatest increase in mRNA levels (17.2-fold), followed by lovastatin (10.7-fold), simvastatin (4.1-fold), and pravastatin (2.5-fold). Atorvastatin effects on lipoprotein production were determined after acute (1 day) or chronic (2 week) treatment prior to intraperitoneal injection of Triton WR1339. Acute treatment reduced cholesterol (-29%) and apoB (-16%) secretion, with no change in triglyceride secretion. In contrast, chronic treatment elevated cholesterol (+20%), apoB (+31%), and triglyceride (+57%) secretion. Despite increased cholesterol and apoB secretion, plasma levels were reduced by 51% and 46%, respectively. Overall, under acute or chronic conditions, apoB paralleled cholesterol secretion rates, and triglyceride to cholesterol secretion ratios were elevated by 38% and 32%, respectively. We propose that atorvastatin limits cholesterol for lipoprotein assembly, which is compensated for by triglyceride enrichment. In addition, with either acute or chronic atorvastatin treatment, apoB-100 secretion was blocked, and compensated for by an increased secretion of apoB-48. The apoB-48 particles produced are cleared by LDL receptor-independent mechanisms, with an overall effect of reducing LDL production in these mice. These studies support the idea that HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors modulate lipoprotein levels independent of LDL receptors, and suggest they may have utility in hyperlipidemias caused by LDLreceptor disorders.     

The effectiveness and safety of low dose pravastatin in elderly hypertensive hypercholesterolemic subjects on antihypertensive therapy

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of low dose (10 mg) pravastatin in hypercholesterolemic, hypertensive elderly subjects undergoing antihypertensive treatment, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled 6-month trial was conducted. The subjects had a total plasma cholesterol of at least 250 mg/dL and had been, for at least 3 months, consuming a standard lipid-lowering diet (American Heart Association Step 1 Diet). Sixty elderly hypertensive patients randomly received placebo (n = 30) or pravastatin (n = 30) treatment. The dosage consisted of 10 mg of pravastatin daily during the 6-month trial. Over that period, in the pravastatin group, plasma levels of total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol significantly (P < .01) dropped (-20% and -25%, respectively) compared to the placebo group. The plasma level of HDL-cholesterol increased (+5%) while triglycerides slightly decreased (-8%) (P < .05). No serious side effects occurred, and pravastatin was generally tolerated. Fasting hyperinsulinemia (11.0 +/- 0.8 v 9.3 +/- 0.7 microU/mL; P = .06) also improved, although not significantly, after 6 months of pravastatin therapy. Results from this study confirmed that a low dose (10 mg) of pravastatin daily is a safe and effective method of reducing plasma total and LDL-cholesterol in hypercholesterolemic, hypertensive elderly patients who are on concurrent antihypertensive drug therapy.     

Modulation of lipoprotein(a) atherogenicity by high density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in middle-aged men with symptomatic coronary artery disease and normal to moderately elevated serum cholesterol. Regression Growth Evaluation Statin Study (REGRESS) Study Group

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to examine whether lipoprotein(a) levels predict coronary artery lumen changes in patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease (CAD) and normal to moderate hypercholesterolemia. BACKGROUND: Recent conflicting reports have confirmed or refuted the association of lipoprotein(a) with clinical events or angiographically verified disease progression. METHODS: The association between serum lipoprotein(a) and changes in coronary artery lumen was studied in 704 men entered into the Regression Growth Evaluation Statin Study (REGRESS), a double-blind, placebo-controlled, quantitative angiographic study that assessed the effect of 2 years of pravastatin treatment. The primary end points were changes in average mean segment diameter (MSD) and average minimal obstruction diameter (MOD). Pravastatin- and placebo-treated patients were classified as having progressing, regressing or stable CAD, and median lipoprotein(a) concentrations were compared. Bivariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed in the overall patient group and in high risk subgroups. RESULTS: Pravastatin treatment did not affect serum apolipoprotein(a) levels. Median in-trial (sampled at 24 months) apolipoprotein(a) levels for regressing, stable and progressing CAD were, respectively, 130, 162 and 251 U/liter in placebo-treated patients and 143, 224 and 306 U/liter in pravastatin-treated patients. Predictors of MSD and MOD changes were baseline MSD and MOD, in-trial apolipoprotein(a), in-trial high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and baseline use of long-acting nitrates. The multivariate models predicted 14% of MSD changes and 12% of MOD changes; apolipoprotein(a) predicted only 2.6% and 4.8%, respectively. However, in patients with in-trial HDL cholesterol levels <0.7 mmol/liter, apolipoprotein(a) predicted up to 37% of the arteriographic changes. CONCLUSIONS: Serum lipoprotein(a) levels predict coronary artery lumen changes in normal to moderately hypercholesterolemic white men with CAD; its atherogenicity is marked in the presence of concomitant hypoalphalipoproteinemia.     

Protective role of the free glucocorticoid pool in development of autoimmune hemolytic anemia

OBJECTIVE: Patients with type II diabetes mellitus have an increased risk of coronary he disease. We investigated the efficacy and safety of pravastatin in the treatment of patients with diabetic nephropathy and hypercholesterolemia. METHOD: In this 6-months study, 12 patients (4 men, 8 women, mean age 60.5 +/- 10.8 years), with diabetic nephropathy and hypercholesterolemia (fasting plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels -LDL-C- > 130 mg/dl) received pravastatin 10 mg/day. The dose could be doubled after 4 weeks. Seven patients have chronic renal failure. RESULTS: Significant reductions in LDL-C (-19.1%, p < 0.05), total cholesterol (-16%, p < 0.01), very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-29.2%, p < 0.05), apolipoprotein B (-21.5%, p < 0.05), and triglycerides (-26.0%, p < 0.01) were noted. No changes were found either in high-density-cholesterol or its fractions (HDL2 and HDL3) or in apolipoprotein A plasmatic levels. Pravastatin was well tolerated and no one side effect was detected. No clinically significant changes on the control of diabetes, renal function, as assessed by plasmatic creatinin and creatinin clearance, and proteinuria were seen during the follow-up time. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the study demonstrate that pravastatin is well tolerated and effective in lowering total cholesterol and LDL-C in patients with diabetic nephropathy and hypercholesterolemia.     

A comparison of estrogen replacement, pravastatin, and combined treatment for the management of hypercholesterolemia in postmenopausal women

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate and compare the lipid-altering effects of conjugated estrogens and pravastatin, alone and in combination, in postmenopausal women with hypercholesterolemia. METHODS: This was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial with 4 parallel groups. Participants (N = 76) were randomly assigned to receive conjugated estrogens, 0.625 mg/d; pravastatin sodium, 20 mg/d; conjugated estrogens plus pravastatin; or a placebo for 16 weeks. RESULTS: Primary end points were changes in serum lipid parameters. Among participants treated with conjugated estrogens, levels of non-high density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) (13.0%) and calculated low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (13.5%) decreased, while levels of HDL-C (22.5%) and triglycerides (4.2%) increased. Participants in the pravastatin group achieved reductions of 23.7% and 25.4% in non-HDL-C and calculated LDL-C levels, respectively. Levels of HDL-C increased slightly (3.7%) and triglycerides decreased by 12.1%. Among participants treated with a combination of conjugated estrogens plus pravastatin, the non-HDL-C (-25.2%) and calculated LDL-C (-28.7%) responses were similar to those of the pravastatin group, and the HDL-C response (21.2%) was similar to that observed in the conjugated estrogens group. Triglyceride levels remained similar to baseline (-0.9%) in the combined treatment group. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of conjugated estrogens resulted in potentially antiatherogenic changes in levels of non-HDL-C, HDL-C, and calculated LDL-C. The HDL-C response to combined treatment was similar to that observed in women taking conjugated estrogens alone, while the non-HDL-C and LDL-C responses to combined treatment were similar to those produced by pravastatin therapy alone. These findings support the position of the National Cholesterol Education Program that estrogen replacement, with a progestin where indicated, should be given consideration as a therapeutic option for the management of hypercholesterolemia in postmenopausal women.     

Efficacy and safety of pravastatin in African Americans with primary hypercholesterolemia

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery disease strikes early and may prove particularly severe in persons of African-American descent. Therefore, we studied the lipid-lowering efficacy and safety of pravastatin sodium (20 mg/d), a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor, in 245 African-American patients with primary hypercholesterolemia. METHODS: After 4 weeks on an American Heart Association phase I low-fat diet, patients were randomized in a double-blind manner to either pravastatin or placebo in a 3:1 ratio. RESULTS: After 12 weeks of pravastatin treatment, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels declined 25.8%, total cholesterol levels 20.3%, and triglyceride levels 6.2%, while high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels remained essentially unchanged. Overall, 72% of pravastatin-treated patients achieved reductions in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level in excess of 20%, and 44% attained declines in excess of 30% (both P < .01 vs placebo). Pravastatin was generally well tolerated in this population, with one patient (0.5%) exhibiting a reversible myopathy with creatine kinase elevations to 10 times the upper limit of normal. No substantial elevations of aminotransferase levels of two to three times the upper limit of normal occurred in either the pravastatin or the placebo group. Drug compliance was high, exceeding 90%. CONCLUSION: Pravastatin appears to be an effective and safe lipid-lowering agent and is the first 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor to be studied extensively in this underrepresented population.     

Hormonal regulation of lipoprotein(a) levels: effects of estrogen replacement therapy on lipoprotein(a) and acute phase reactants in postmenopausal women

Estrogen lowers lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels, but the mechanisms involved have not been clarified. To address the relationship between estrogenic effects on Lp(a) and serum lipids, and on other plasma proteins of hepatic origin, 15 healthy postmenopausal women participated in a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, crossover study with 4 weeks of oral conjugated estrogens (0.625 mg/d) and placebo, separated by a 6-week period. Lp(a) levels decreased during estrogen treatment in 14 of the 15 subjects (mean decrease, 23%; P < .001). In response to estrogen, apolipoprotein A-I (apoA-I), HDL cholesterol, and triglyceride levels increased by 12% (P = .001), 11% (P < .001), and 10% (P = .02), respectively. Apolipoprotein B (apoB) and LDL cholesterol levels decreased by 7% (P = .01) and 12% (P = .03), respectively, ApoB, LDL cholesterol, and Lp(a) levels fell within 1 week of treatment, whereas apoA-I and HDL cholesterol levels rose more slowly. Levels of acid alpha 1-glycoprotein (AAG) and haptoglobin (HPT), two hepatically derived acute phase proteins, also decreased during estrogen treatment by 18% (P < .001) and 25% (P = .002), respectively. Although the changes in AAG and HPT in response to estrogen were highly correlated (r = .67, P = .009), we were unable to detect a correlation between change in either acute phase protein and change in Lp(a) (r = -.14 and -.24, P = .64 and .41). The lack of correlation between the changes in two acute phase reactants and Lp(a) suggests different underlying mechanisms for the effects of estrogen on these liver-derived proteins.     

Influence of long-term, low-dose, diuretic-based, antihypertensive therapy on glucose, lipid, uric acid, and potassium levels in older men and women with isolated systolic hypertension: The Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program. SHEP Cooperative Research Group

BACKGROUND: Previous studies often of short duration have raised concerns that antihypertensive therapy with diuretics and beta-blockers adversely alters levels of other cardiovascular disease risk factors. METHODS: The Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program was a community-based, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of treatment of isolated systolic hypertension in men and women aged 60 years and older. This retrospective analysis evaluated development of diabetes mellitus in all 4736 participants in the Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program, including changes in serum chemistry test results in a subgroup for 3 years. Patients were randomized to receive placebo or treatment with active drugs, with the dose increased in stepwise fashion if blood pressure control goals were not attained: step 1, 12.5 mg of chlorthalidone or 25.0 mg of chlorthalidone; and step 2, the addition of 25 mg of atenolol or 50 mg of atenolol or reserpine or matching placebo. RESULTS: After 3 years, the active treatment group had a 13/4 mm Hg greater reduction in systolic and diastolic blood pressure than the placebo group (both groups, P<.001). New cases of diabetes were reported by 8.6% of the participants in the active treatment group and 7.5% of the participants in the placebo group (P=.25). Small effects of active treatment compared with placebo were observed with fasting levels of glucose (+0.20 mmol/L [+3.6 mg/dL]; P<.01), total cholesterol (+0.09 mmol/L [+3.5 mg/dL]; P<.01), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-0.02 mmol/L [-0.77 mg/dL]; P<.01) and creatinine (+2.8 micromol/L [+0.03 mg/dL]; P<.001). Larger effects were seen with fasting levels of triglycerides (+0.9 mmol/L [+17 mg/dL]; P<.001), uric acid (+35 micromol/L [+.06 mg/dL]; P<.001), and potassium (-0.3 mmol/L; P<.001). No evidence was found for a subgroup at higher risk of risk factor changes with active treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Antihypertensive therapy with low-dose chlorthalidone (supplemented if necessary) for isolated systolic hypertension lowers blood pressure and its cardiovascular disease complications and has relatively mild effects on other cardiovascular disease risk factor levels.     

Cardiovascular events and their reduction with pravastatin in diabetic and glucose-intolerant myocardial infarction survivors with average cholesterol levels: subgroup analyses in the cholesterol and recurrent events (CARE) trial. The Care Investigators

BACKGROUND: Although diabetes is a major risk factor for coronary heart disease (CHD), little information is available on the effects of lipid lowering in diabetic patients. We determined whether lipid-lowering treatment with pravastatin prevents recurrent cardiovascular events in diabetic patients with CHD and average cholesterol levels. METHODS AND RESULTS: The Cholesterol And Recurrent Events (CARE) trial, a 5-year trial that compared the effect of pravastatin and placebo, included 586 patients (14.1%) with clinical diagnoses of diabetes. The participants with diabetes were older, more obese, and more hypertensive. The mean baseline lipid concentrations in the group with diabetes--136 mg/dL LDL cholesterol, 38 mg/dL HDL cholesterol, and 164 mg/dL triglycerides--were similar to those in the nondiabetic group. LDL cholesterol reduction by pravastatin was similar (27% and 28%) in the diabetic and nondiabetic groups, respectively. In the placebo group, the diabetic patients suffered more recurrent coronary events (CHD death, nonfatal myocardial infarction [MI], CABG, and PTCA) than did the nondiabetic patients (37% versus 25%). Pravastatin treatment reduced the absolute risk of coronary events for the diabetic and nondiabetic patients by 8.1% and 5.2% and the relative risk by 25% (P=0.05) and 23% (P<0.001), respectively. Pravastatin reduced the relative risk for revascularization procedures by 32% (P=0.04) in the diabetic patients. In the 3553 patients who were not diagnosed as diabetic, 342 had impaired fasting glucose at entry defined by the American Diabetes Association as 110 to 125 mg/dL. These nondiabetic patients with impaired fasting glucose had a higher rate of recurrent coronary events than those with normal fasting glucose (eg, 13% versus 10% for nonfatal MI). Recurrence rates tended to be lower in the pravastatin compared with placebo group (eg, -50%, P=0.05 for nonfatal MI). CONCLUSIONS: Diabetic patients and nondiabetic patients with impaired fasting glucose are at high risk of recurrent coronary events that can be substantially reduced by pravastatin treatment.     

Impact of gender on the metabolism of apolipoprotein A-I in HDL subclasses LpAI and LpAI:AII in older subjects

The behavior of apolipoprotein (apo) A-I in lipoprotein (Lp) AI and LpAI:AII was studied in 11 postmenopausal females and 11 males matched for plasma triglyceride and total cholesterol levels. Subjects consumed a baseline diet [35% fat (14% saturated, 15% monounsaturated, and 7% polyunsaturated), 15% protein, 49% carbohydrate, and 147 mg cholesterol/1000 kcal] for 6 weeks before the start of the kinetic study. At the end of the diet period, using a primed-constant infusion of [5,5,5-2H3]leucine, residence times (RT) and secretion rates (SR) of apoA-I were determined in 2 subpopulations of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) particles, LpAI and LpAI:AII. Plasma total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglyceride concentrations were similar in males and females. The mean plasma HDL cholesterol concentration in males (1.14 +/- 0.23 mmol/L; mean +/- SD) was lower than in females (1.42 +/- 0.18 mmol/L; P =. 0034). Similarly, the mean plasma concentration of apoA-I in males (130 +/- 21 mg/dL) was lower than that in females (150 +/- 19 mg/dL; P = .0421). The RT of apoA-I in either LpAI or LpAI:AII was similar between men and women. Despite the higher plasma apo A-I levels in female compared with male subjects, total apoA-I and apoA-I in LpAI and LpAI:AII pool sizes were similar between the two groups, attributable to the lower body weight of the female subjects. The mean SR of total apoA-I in males (8.5 +/- 2.7 mg.kg-1.d-1) was 22% lower than in females (10.9 +/- 2.3 mg.kg-1.d-1; P = .0389). The SR of both apoA-I in LpAI and LpAI:AII was lower in males than females, although the differences did not reach statistical significance. These data suggest that the difference observed in HDL cholesterol concentration between males and females is attributable to SR of apoA-I and not the catabolic rate.     

Transendothelial migration of megakaryocytes in response to stromal cell-derived factor 1 (SDF-1) enhances platelet formation

Cerivastatin sodium, a synthetic and pure enantiomeric 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor, is considered effective in the treatment of mild-to-moderate primary hyper-cholesterolemia (total cholesterol < or = 220-259 mg/dL) at a daily dose of 0.15 mg. We compared the efficacy and tolerability of a dosage of 0.3 mg/d with those of a dosage of 0.15 mg/d in patients with severe primary hypercholesterolemia (serum total cholesterol > or = 260 mg/dL). After a minimum of 4 weeks' lead-in with placebo, 73 patients with severe primary hypercholesterolemia were randomly assigned to receive either 0.15 or 0.3 mg of cerivastatin sodium once daily after the evening meal for 12 weeks. In 58 patients, the same drug was continued at a flexible dosage for an additional 36 weeks or longer to assess the long-term efficacy and tolerability of cerivastatin sodium. During the 12-week treatment period, serum total cholesterol levels decreased significantly from baseline in both dosage groups, but the percentage reduction was significantly greater in the 0.3-mg group (range, 24.4% to 25.6%) than in the 0.15-mg group (range, 19.4% to 21.6%). The percentage reduction in levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, and apolipoprotein B and the percentage increase in levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol were significantly greater in the 0.3-mg group than in the 0.15-mg group. When the results for the 0.3- and 0.15-mg groups were combined, the percentage of change in serum lipid levels at 48 weeks remained as stable as at 12 weeks. No serious adverse reactions were observed. We concluded that the higher dose of cerivastatin sodium was more effective than the lower dose, with comparable tolerability, in the treatment of patients with severe primary hypercholesterolemia.     

Treatment effects on serum lipoprotein lipids, apolipoproteins and low density lipoprotein particle size and relationships of lipoprotein variables to progression of coronary artery disease in the Bezafibrate Coronary Atherosclerosis Intervention Trial (BECAIT)

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the mechanisms by which bezafibrate retarded the progression of coronary lesions in the Bezafibrate Coronary Atherosclerosis Intervention Trial (BECAIT), we examined the relationships of on-trial lipoproteins and lipoprotein subfractions to the angiographic outcome measurements. BACKGROUND: BECAIT, the first double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized serial angiographic trial of a fibrate compound, showed that progression of focal coronary atherosclerosis in young survivors of myocardial infarction could be retarded by bezafibrate treatment. METHODS: A total of 92 dyslipoproteinemic men who had survived a first myocardial infarction before the age of 45 years were randomly assigned to treatment for 5 years with bezafibrate (200 mg three times daily) or placebo; 81 patients underwent baseline and at least one post-treatment coronary angiography. RESULTS: In addition to the decrease in very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol (-53%) and triglyceride (-46%) and plasma apolipoprotein (apo) B (-9%) levels, bezafibrate treatment resulted in a significant increase in high density lipoprotein-3 (HDL3) cholesterol (+9%) level and a shift in the low density lipoprotein (LDL) subclass distribution toward larger particle species (peak particle diameter +032 nm). The on-trial HDL3 cholesterol and plasma apo B concentrations were found to be independent predictors of the changes in mean minimum lumen diameter (r=-0.23, p < 0.05), and percent (%) stenosis (r = 0.30, p < 0.01), respectively. Decreases in small dense LDL and/or VLDL lipid concentrations were unrelated to disease progression. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the effect of bezafibrate on progression of focal coronary atherosclerosis could be at least partly attributed to a rise in HDL3 cholesterol and a decrease in the total number of apo B-containing lipoproteins.     

Effect of intensive glycemic control on fibrinogen, lipids, and lipoproteins: Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study in Type II Diabetes Mellitus

BACKGROUND: The Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study in Type II Diabetes Mellitus prospectively studied insulin-treated patients with type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus, achieving 2.1% glycosylated hemoglobin separation between intensive- and standard-treatment arms (P<.001) for 2 years. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of intensive therapy on serum fibrinogen and lipid levels, compared with standard treatment. METHODS: One hundred fifty-three male subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus and who required insulin treatment were recruited from 5 Veterans Affairs medical centers. The subjects were divided into intensive- and standard-treatment arms for a randomized prospective study. Dyslipidemia was managed identically in both arms (diet, drugs). Fibrinogen levels and lipid fractions were measured in the full cohort. Lipid fractions are separately reported in patients not treated with hypolipidemic agents. RESULTS: There were no baseline differences between arms. Fibrinogen levels rose in the intensive-treatment arm at 1 year (from 3.34+/-0.12 to 3.75+/-0.15 g/L; P<.001) but returned to baseline at 2 years (3.47+/-0.12 g/L). There was no change in the standard-treatment arm. Triglyceride levels decreased in the intensive-treatment arm from 2.25+/-0.27 to 1.54+/-0.14 mmol/L (199+/-24 to 136+/-12 mg/ dL) at 1 year (P = .004) and to 1.74+/-0.18 mmol/L (154+/-16 mg/dL) at 2 years (P = .03); there was no change in the standard-treatment arm. Cholesterol levels decreased in the intensive-treatment arm at 1 year from 5.4+/-0.21 to 4.99+/-0.13 mmol/L (207+/-8 to 193+/-5 mg/dL) (P = .02); there was no change in the standard-treatment arm. Levels of low- and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol decreased in the standard-treatment arm only by 2 years, from 3.44+/-0.13 to 3.16+/-0.10 mmol/L (133+/-5 to 122+/-4 mg/ dL) (P =.02) and from 1.10+/-0.03 to 1.00+/-0.03 mmol/L (42+/-1 to 38+/-1 mg/dL) (P<.001) for low-density and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, respectively. Levels of apolipoprotein B decreased in both treatment arms (P<.001), and apolipoprotein A1 levels decreased in the standard-treatment arm (P<.01). Lipoprotein (a) levels did not change in either treatment arm. Lipid results were essentially identical whether examined in the full cohort or excluding those patients receiving hypolipidemic agents. CONCLUSIONS: Intensive insulin therapy led to a potentially beneficial reduction in serum triglyceride levels and preservation of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and apolipoprotein A1 levels. However, it caused transient elevation in plasma fibrinogen levels, a possible thrombogenic effect.     

Pravastatin experience in elderly and non-elderly patients

Epidemiologic evidence linking elevated cholesterol concentrations and coronary heart disease (CHD) through the eighth decade of life provides a rationale for lowering cholesterol concentrations to reduce morbidity and mortality from CHD. Pravastatin, a well tolerated HMG CoA reductase inhibitor with a convenient once-daily dosing regimen, has been shown to effectively lower total and low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol. Individual data from more than 1800 hypercholesterolemic patients enrolled in six double-blind, randomized, multicenter studies were pooled and then analyzed to compare the safety and efficacy of pravastatin in the elderly (i.e., patients at least 65 years old) and the non-elderly. In short-term studies (8-16 weeks), response was dose-related and similar in elderly and non-elderly subjects. Pravastatin 20 or 40 mg daily lowered total cholesterol 19-25%, LDL-cholesterol 25-33%, and triglycerides 14-23%; high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol increased 5-10%. During long-term studies, improvements were sustained for more than 24 months in both the non-elderly and elderly. The incidences of adverse drug events and laboratory abnormalities were similar in the elderly and non-elderly patients in all groups (active treatment control with resin, pravastatin alone, or combination therapy). In short-term studies, treatment was discontinued because of adverse events in < 1% of all patients treated with pravastatin (all doses) or placebo. The frequency and profile of adverse events were similar among patients treated with pravastatin or placebo. In long-term studies, treatment was discontinued in 0.4% of patients in the pravastatin group and in 0.3% of the patients in the bile-acid-binding resin group. If drug therapy is warranted, pravastatin appears to be safe and effective for long-term use in elderly patients with hypercholesterolemia.     

Effects of lowering average of below-average cholesterol levels on the progression of carotid atherosclerosis: results of the LIPID Atherosclerosis Substudy. LIPID Trial Research Group

BACKGROUND: Cholesterol lowering in patients with above-average cholesterol levels has been shown to reduce the progression of atherosclerosis and lower the risk of coronary heart disease events. However, there has been uncertainty about the effects of cholesterol lowering in patients with average or below-average cholesterol levels. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this study, 522 patients with a history of myocardial infarction or unstable angina and with baseline levels of total cholesterol between 4 and 7 mmol/L (mean, 5.7 mmol/L) were randomized to treatment with a low fat diet plus pravastatin (40 mg daily) or to a low fat diet plus placebo. Treatment with pravastatin reduced the levels of total cholesterol by 19%, LDL cholesterol by 27%, apolipoprotein B by 19%, and triglycerides by 13% (all 2P<.0001) and increased apolipoprotein A1 and HDL cholesterol levels by 4% (both 2P<.0005), in comparison with placebo. Carotid atherosclerosis was assessed from B-mode ultrasound measurements of the common carotid artery. After 4 years, mean carotid wall thickness had increased by 0.048 mm (SE=0.01) in the placebo group and declined by 0.014 mm in the pravastatin-treated group (SE=0.01) (2P for difference <.0001). The effect of treatment on wall thickness was similar in three groups classified by tertiles of total cholesterol at baseline, with mean levels of 4.8, 5.7, and 6.6 mmol/L, respectively (2P for interaction >.8). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with pravastatin reduced the development of carotid atherosclerosis among patients with coronary heart disease and a wide range of pretreatment cholesterol levels. Treatment with this agent prevented any detectable increase in carotid wall thickening over 4 years of follow-up.