Effect of carbon containing SiNx antireflection coating on the screen‐printed contact and low illumination performance of silicon solar cell

Screen‐printed metal contact formation through a carbon containing antireflection coating was investigated for silicon solar cells by fabricating conventional carbon‐free SiN_x and carbon‐rich SiC_xN_y film. An appreciable difference was found in the average shunt resistance (R_sh), which was about an order of magnitude higher for SiC_xN_y‐coated solar cells relative to the counterpart SiN_x‐coated solar cells. Series resistance (R_s) and fill factor (FF) were comparable for both antireflection coatings but the starting efficiency of SiC_xN_y‐coated cell was ~0·2% lower because of slightly inferior surface passivation. However, SiC_xN_y‐coated solar cells showed less degradation under lower illumination (<1000 W/m²) compared with the SiN_x‐coated cells due to reduced FF degradation under low illumination. Theoretical calculations in this paper support that this is a direct result of high R_sh. Detailed photovoltaic system and cost modeling is performed to quantify the enhanced energy production and the reduced levelized cost of electricity due to higher shunt resistance of the SiC_xN_y‐coated cells. It is shown that R_sh value below 30 Ω (7000 Ω cm² for 239 cm² cell) can lead to appreciable loss in energy production in regions of low solar insolation. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Multi‐crystalline Si solar cells with very fast deposited (180 nm/min) passivating hot‐wire CVD silicon nitride as antireflection coating

Hot‐wire chemical vapor deposition (HWCVD) is a promising technique for very fast deposition of high quality thin films. We developed processing conditions for device‐ quality silicon nitride (a‐SiN_x:H) anti‐reflection coating (ARC) at high deposition rates of 3 nm/s. The HWCVD SiN_x layers were deposited on multicrystalline silicon (mc‐Si) solar cells provided by IMEC and ECN Solar Energy. Reference cells were provided with optimized parallel plate PECVD SiN_x and microwave PECVD SiN_x respectively. The application of HWCVD SiN_x on IMEC mc‐Si solar cells led to effective passivation, evidenced by a V_oc of 606 mV and consistent IQE curves. For further optimization, series were made with HW SiN_x (with different x) on mc‐Si solar cells from ECN Solar Energy. The best cell efficiencies were obtained for samples with a N/Si ratio of 1·2 and a high mass density of >2·9 g/cm³. The best solar cells reached an efficiency of 15·7%, which is similar to the best reference cell, made from neighboring wafers, with microwave PECVD SiN_x. The IQE measurements and high V_oc values for these cells with HW SiN_x demonstrate good bulk passivation. PC1D simulations confirm the excellent bulk‐ and surface‐passivation for HW SiN_x coatings. Interesting is the significantly higher blue response for the cells with HWCVD SiN_x when compared to the PECVD SiN_x reference cells. This difference in blue response is caused by lower light absorption of the HWCVD layers (compared to microwave CVD; ECN) and better surface passivation (compared to parallel plate PECVD; IMEC). The application of HW SiN_x as a passivating antireflection layer on mc‐Si solar cells leads to efficiencies comparable to those with optimized PECVD SiN_x coatings, although HWCVD is performed at a much higher deposition rate. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Front and rear silicon‐nitride‐passivated multicrystalline silicon solar cells with an efficiency of 18.1%

A solar cell process designed to utilise low‐temperature plasma‐enhanced chemical vapour deposited (PECVD) silicon nitride (SiN_x) films as front and rear surface passivation was applied to fabricate multicrystalline silicon (mc‐Si) solar cells. Despite the simple photolithography‐free processing sequence, an independently confirmed efficiency of 18.1% (cell area 2 × 2 cm²) was achieved. This excellent efficiency can be predominantly attributed to the superior quality of the rear surface passivation scheme consisting of an SiN_x film in combination with a local aluminium back‐surface field (LBSF). Thus, it is demonstrated that low‐temperature PECVD SiN_x films are well suited to achieve excellent rear surface passivation on mc‐Si. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Comparison of TiO2 and other dielectric coatings for buried‐contact solar cells: a review

This paper compares the optical, electronic, physical and chemical properties of dielectric thin films that are commonly used to enhance the performance of bulk silicon photovoltaic devices. The standard buried‐contact (BC) solar cell presents a particularly challenging set of criteria, requiring the dielectric film to act as: (i) an anti‐reflection (AR) coating; (ii) a film compatible with surface passivation; (iii) a mask for an electroless metal plating step; (iv) a diffusion barrier for achieving a selective emitter; (v) a film with excellent chemical resistance; (vi) a stable layer during high‐temperature processing. The dielectric coatings reviewed here include thermally grown silicon dioxide (SiO₂), silicon nitride deposited by plasma‐enhanced chemical vapour deposition (a‐ SiN_x :H) and low‐pressure chemical vapour deposition (Si₃N₄), silicon oxynitride (SiON), cerium dioxide (CeO₂), zinc sulphide (ZnS), and titanium dioxide (TiO₂). While TiO₂ dielectric coatings exhibit the best optical performance and a simple post‐deposition surface passivation sequence has been developed, they require an additional sacrificial diffusion barrier to survive the heavy groove diffusion step. A‐ SiN_x :H affords passivation through its high fixed positive charge density and large hydrogen concentration; however, it is difficult to retain these electronic benefits during lengthy high‐temperature processing. Therefore, for the BC solar cell, Si₃N₄ films would appear to be the best choice of dielectric films common in industrial use. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

20.7% efficient ion‐implanted large area n‐type front junction silicon solar cells with rear point contacts formed by laser opening and physical vapor deposition

In this work, we report on ion‐implanted, high‐efficiency n‐type silicon solar cells fabricated on large area pseudosquare Czochralski wafers. The sputtering of aluminum (Al) via physical vapor deposition (PVD) in combination with a laser‐patterned dielectric stack was used on the rear side to produce front junction cells with an implanted boron emitter and a phosphorus back surface field. Front and back surface passivation was achieved by thin thermally grown oxide during the implant anneal. Both front and back oxides were capped with SiN_x, followed by screen‐printed metal grid formation on the front side. An ultraviolet laser was used to selectively ablate the SiO₂/SiN_x passivation stack on the back to form the pattern for metal–Si contact. The laser pulse energy had to be optimized to fully open the SiO₂/SiN_x passivation layers, without inducing appreciable damage or defects on the surface of the n⁺ back surface field layer. It was also found that a low temperature annealing for less than 3 min after PVD Al provided an excellent charge collecting contact on the back. In order to obtain high fill factor of ~80%, an in situ plasma etching in an inert ambient prior to PVD was found to be essential for etching the native oxide formed in the rear vias during the front contact firing. Finally, through optimization of the size and pitch of the rear point contacts, an efficiency of 20.7% was achieved for the large area n‐type passivated emitter, rear totally diffused cell. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

20.0% Efficiency Si Nano/Microstructures Based Solar Cells with Excellent Broadband Spectral Response

Spectral response of solar cells determines the output performance of the devices. In this work, a 20.0% efficient silicon (Si) nano/microstructures (N/M‐Strus) based solar cell with a standard solar wafer size of 156 × 156 mm² (pseudo‐square) has been successfully fabricated, by employing the simultaneous stack SiO₂/SiN_x passivation for the front N/M‐Strus based n⁺‐emitter and the rear surface. The key to success lies in the excellent broadband spectral responses combining the improved short‐wavelength response of the stack SiO₂/SiN_x passivated Si N/M‐Strus based n⁺‐emitter with the extraordinary long‐wavelength response of the stack SiO₂/SiN_x passivated rear reflector. Benefiting from the broadband spectral response, the highest open‐circuit voltage (V_oc) and short‐circuit current density (J_sc) reach up to 0.653 V and 39.0 mA cm^?2, respectively. This high‐performance screen‐printed Si N/M‐Strus based solar cell has shown a very promising way to the commercial mass production of the Si based high‐efficient solar cells.     

Textured silicon surface passivation by high‐rate expanding thermal plasma deposited SiN and thermal SiO2/SiN stacks for crystalline silicon solar cells

Expanding thermal plasma (ETP) deposited silicon nitride (SiN) with optical properties suited for the use as antireflection coating (ARC) on silicon solar cells has been used as passivation layer on textured monocrystalline silicon wafers. The surface passivation behavior of these high‐rate (>5 nm/s) deposited SiN films has been investigated for single layer passivation schemes and for thermal SiO₂/SiN stack systems before and after a thermal treatment that is normally used for contact‐firing. It is shown that as‐deposited ETP SiN used as a single passivation layer almost matches the performance of a thermal oxide. Furthermore, the SiN passivation behavior improves after a contact‐firing step, while the thermal oxide passivation degrades which makes ETP SiN a better alternative for single passivation layer schemes in combination with a contact‐firing step. Moreover, using the ETP SiN as a part of a thermal SiO₂/SiN stack proves to be the best alternative by realizing very low dark saturation current densities of <20 fA/cm² on textured solar‐grade FZ silicon wafers and this is further improved to <10 fA/cm² after the anneal step. Optical and electrical film characterizations have also been carried out on these SiN layers in order to study the behavior of the SiN before and after the thermal treatment. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Bulk passivation of multicrystalline silicon solar cells induced by high‐rate‐deposited (> 1 nm/s) silicon nitride films

Silicon nitride (a‐SiN_x:H) films deposited by the expanding thermal plasma at high rate (> 1 nm/s) have been studied for application as anti‐reflection coatings for multicrystalline silicon (mc‐Si) solar cells. Internal quantum efficiency measurements have revealed that bulk passivation is achieved after a firing‐through process of the a‐SiN_x:H as deposited from NH₃/SiH₄ and N₂/SiH₄ plasmas. However, the a‐SiN_x:H films deposited from N₂/SiH₄ show a lower passivation quality than those deposited from NH₃/SiH₄. This has been attributed to a poorer thermal stability of the films deposited from the N₂/SiH₄ plasma, resulting in structural changes within the film during the firing step. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Industrial high‐rate (∼5 nm/s) deposited silicon nitride yielding high‐quality bulk and surface passivation under optimum anti‐reflection coating conditions

High‐quality surface and bulk passivation of crystalline silicon solar cells has been obtained under optimum anti‐reflection coating properties by silicon nitride (a‐SiN_x:H) deposited at very high deposition rates of ∼5 nm/s. These a‐SiN_x:H films were deposited using the expanding thermal plasma (ETP) technology under regular processing conditions in an inline industrial‐type reactor with a nominal throughput of 960 solar cells/hour. The low surface recombination velocities (50–70 cm/s) were obtained on p‐type silicon substrates (8·4 Ω cm resistivity) for as‐deposited and annealed films within the broad refractive index range of 1·9–2·4, which covers the optimum bulk passivation and anti‐reflection coating performance reached at a refractive index of ∼2·1. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

High efficiency screen‐printed EFG Si solar cells through rapid thermal processing‐induced bulk lifetime enhancement

This paper shows that one second (1 s) firing of Si solar cells with screen‐printed Al on the back and SiN _x anti‐reflection coating on the front can produce a high quality Al‐doped back‐surface‐field (Al‐BSF) and significantly enhance SiN _x ‐induced defect hydrogenation in the bulk Si. Open‐circuit voltage, internal quantum efficiency measurements, and cross‐sectional scanning electron microscopy pictures on float‐zone silicon cells revealed that 1 s firing in rapid thermal processing at 750°C produces just as good a BSF as 60 s firing, indicating that the quality of Al‐BSF region is not a strong function of RTP firing time at 750°C. Analysis of edge‐defined film‐fed grown (EFG) Si cells showed that short‐term firing is much more effective in improving the hydrogen passivation of bulk defects in EFG Si. Average minority‐carrier lifetime in EFG wafers improved from ∼3 to ∼33 μs by 60 s firing but reached as high as 95μs with 1 s firing, resulting in 15·6% efficient screen‐printed cells on EFG Si. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Laser processing of Al2O3/a‐SiCx:H stacks: a feasible solution for the rear surface of high‐efficiency p‐type c‐Si solar cells

We explore the potential of laser processing aluminium oxide (Al₂O₃)/amorphous silicon carbide (a‐SiC_x:H) stacks to be used at the rear surface of p‐type crystalline silicon (c‐Si) solar cells. For this stack, excellent quality surface passivation is measured with effective surface recombination velocities as low as 2 cm/s. By means of an infrared laser, the dielectric film is locally opened. Simultaneously, part of the aluminium in the Al₂O₃ film is introduced into the c‐Si, creating p+ regions that allow ohmic contacts with low‐surface recombination velocities. At optimum pitch, high‐efficiency solar cells are achievable for substrates of 0.5–2.5 Ω cm. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Laser‐fired contact optimization in c‐Si solar cells

In this work we study the optimization of laser‐fired contact (LFC) processing parameters, namely laser power and number of pulses, based on the electrical resistance measurement of an aluminum single LFC point. LFC process has been made through four passivation layers that are typically used in c‐Si and mc‐Si solar cell fabrication: thermally grown silicon oxide (SiO₂), deposited phosphorus‐doped amorphous silicon carbide (a‐SiC_x/H(n)), aluminum oxide (Al₂O₃) and silicon nitride (SiN_x/H) films. Values for the LFC resistance normalized by the laser spot area in the range of 0.65–3 mΩ cm² have been obtained. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Optical and Electrical Properties of TixSi1‐xOy Films

Ti_xSi_1xO_y (TSO) thin films are fabricated using plasma‐enhanced atomic layer deposition. The Ti content in the TSO films is controlled by adjusting the sub‐cycle ratio of TiO₂ and SiO₂. The refractive indices of SiO₂ and TiO₂ are 1.4 and 2.4, respectively. Hence, tailoring of the refractivity indices from 1.4 to 2.4 is feasible. The controllability of the refractive index and film thickness enables application of an antireflection coating layer to TSO films for use as a thin film solar cell. The TSO coating layer on an Si wafer dramatically reduces reflectivity compared to a bare Si wafer. In the measurement of the current‐voltage characteristics, a nonlinear coefficient of 13.6 is obtained in the TSO films.     

Approach for Al2O3 rear surface passivation of industrial p‐type Si PERC above 19%

Atomic layer deposition (ALD) of thin Al₂O₃ (≤10 nm) films is used to improve the rear surface passivation of large‐area screen‐printed p‐type Si passivated emitter and rear cells (PERC). A blister‐free stack of Al₂O₃/SiO_x/SiN_x is developed, leading to an improved back reflection and a rear recombination current (J_0,rear) of 92 ± 6 fA/cm². The Al₂O₃/SiO_x/SiN_x stack is blister‐free if a 700°C anneal in N₂ is performed after the Al₂O₃ deposition and prior to the SiO_x/SiN_x capping. A clear relationship between blistering density and lower open‐circuit voltage (V_OC) due to increased rear contacting area is shown. In case of the blister‐free Al₂O₃/SiO_x/SiN_x rear surface passivation stack, an average cell efficiency of 19.0% is reached and independently confirmed by FhG‐ISE CalLab. Compared with SiO_x/SiN_x‐passivated PERC, there is an obvious gain in V_OC and short‐circuit current (J_SC) of 5 mV and 0.2 mA/cm², respectively, thanks to improved rear surface passivation and rear internal reflection. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Laser induced defects in laser doped solar cells

Laser doping offers a promising method to define selective emitters for solar cells. Its main advantage is the localised nature of the laser beam, which allows melting of the surface area without heating the bulk. The ability to perform this process over a dielectric film offers further benefits, such as the possibility of creating self‐aligned metallisation patterns simultaneously with the selective emitter formation. However, laser induced defects, contaminations and discontinuities in the selective emitter can reduce solar cell performance. In this work the influence of different dielectric films on defect formation is investigated. It was found that a thin oxide beneath the SiN_x improves the implied open circuit voltage of the solar cells for a wide range of laser output powers. Fewer defects were observed when using this SiO₂/SiN_x stack compared to the standard single SiN_x anti‐reflection coating layer. It was also found that the recrystallised silicon layer grows epitaxially according the substrate orientation. No dislocation or stacking faults were observed in deeper areas using transmission electron microscopy, although some defects were observed near the surface. Electron beam induced current images revealed discontinuities in junctions formed with high laser powers. We conclude that micro‐cracks create these discontinuities, which can potentially induce shunts. Finally, laser doped solar cells with a standard SiN_x and with a double SiO₂/SiN_x stack layer as anti‐reflection coating were compared. An efficiency of 18.4% on a large area commercial grade p‐type CZ substrate was achieved. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Performance improvement of c-Si solar cell by a combination of SiNx/SiOx passivation and double P-diffusion gettering treatment

SiN_x/SiO_x passivation and double side P-diffusion gettering treatment have been used for the fabrication of c-Si solar cells. The solar cells fabricated have high open circuit voltage and short circuit current after the double P-diffusion treatment. In addition to better surface passivation effect, SiN_x/SiO_x layer has lower reflectivity in long wavelength range than conventional SiN_x film. As a consequence, such solar cells exhibit higher conversion efficiency and better internal quantum efficiency, compared with conventional c-Si solar cells.     

Optimised antireflection coatings for planar silicon solar cells using remote PECVD silicon nitride and porous silicon dioxide

Silicon nitride (SiN) films fabricated by remote plasma‐enhanced chemical vapour deposition (RPECVD) have recently been shown to provide an excellent electronic passivation of silicon surfaces. This property, in combination with its large refractive index, makes RPECVD SiN an ideal candidate for a surface‐passivating antireflection coating on silicon solar cells. A major problem of these films, however, is the fact that the extinction coefficient increases with increasing refractive index. Hence, a careful optimisation of RPECVD SiN based antireflection coatings on silicon solar cells must consider the light absorption within the films. Optimal optical performance of silicon solar cells in air is obtained if the RPECVD SiN films are combined with a medium with a refractive index below 1·46, such as porous SiO₂. In this study, the dispersion of the refractive indices and the extinction coefficients of RPECVD SiN, porous SiO₂, and several other relevant materials (MgF₂, TiO_x, ZnS, B270 crown glass, soda lime glass, ethylene vinyl acetate and resin as used in commercial photovoltaic modules) are experimentally determined. Based on these data, the short‐circuit currents of planar silicon solar cells covered by RPECVD SiN and/or porous SiO₂ single‐ and multi‐layer antireflection coatings are numerically maximised for glass‐encapsulated as well as non‐encapsulated operating conditions. The porous SiO₂/RPECVD SiN‐based antireflection coatings optimised for these applications are shown to be universally suited for silicon solar cells, regardless of the internal blue or red response of the cells. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Surface passivation of high‐efficiency silicon solar cells by atomic‐layer‐deposited Al2O3

Atomic‐layer‐deposited aluminium oxide (Al₂O₃) is applied as rear‐surface‐passivating dielectric layer to passivated emitter and rear cell (PERC)‐type crystalline silicon (c‐Si) solar cells. The excellent passivation of low‐resistivity p‐type silicon by the negative‐charge‐dielectric Al₂O₃ is confirmed on the device level by an independently confirmed energy conversion efficiency of 20·6%. The best results are obtained for a stack consisting of a 30 nm Al₂O₃ film covered by a 200 nm plasma‐enhanced‐chemical‐vapour‐deposited silicon oxide (SiO_x) layer, resulting in a rear surface recombination velocity (SRV) of 70 cm/s. Comparable results are obtained for a 130 nm single‐layer of Al₂O₃, resulting in a rear SRV of 90 cm/s. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Experimental evidence of parasitic shunting in silicon nitride rear surface passivated solar cells

Many solar cells incorporating SiN_x films as a rear surface passivation scheme have not reached the same high level of cell performance as solar cells incorporating high‐temperature‐grown silicon dioxide films as a rear surface passivation. In this paper, it is shown by direct comparison of solar cells incorporating the two rear surface passivation schemes, that the performance loss is mainly due to a lower short‐circuit current while the open‐circuit voltage is equally high. With a solar cell test structure that features a separation of the rear metal contacts from the passivating SiN_x films, the loss in short‐circuit current can be reduced drastically. Besides a lower short‐ circuit current, dark I–V curves of SiN_x rear surface passivated solar cells exhibit distinct shoulders. The results are explained by parasitic shunting of the induced floating junction (FJ) underneath the SiN_x films with the rear metal contacts. The floating junction is caused by the high density of fixed positive charges in the SiN_x films. Other two‐dimensional effects arising from the injection level dependent SRV of the Si/SiN_x interfaces are discussed as well, but, are found to be of minor importance. Pinholes in the SiN_x films and optical effects due to a different internal rear surface reflectance can be excluded as a major cause for the performance loss of the SiN_x rear surface passivated cells. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Thin Al2O3 passivated boron emitter of n‐type bifacial c‐Si solar cells with industrial process

We have presented thin Al₂O₃ (~4 nm) with SiN_x:H capped (~75 nm) films to effectively passivate the boron‐doped p⁺ emitter surfaces of the n‐type bifacial c‐Si solar cells with BBr₃ diffusion emitter and phosphorus ion‐implanted back surface field. The thin Al₂O₃ capped with SiN_x:H structure not only possesses the excellent field effect and chemical passivation, but also establishes a simple cell structure fully compatible with the existing production lines and processes for the low‐cost n‐type bifacial c‐Si solar cell industrialization. We have successfully achieved the large area (238.95 cm²) high efficiency of 20.89% (front) and 18.45% (rear) n‐type bifacial c‐Si solar cells by optimizing the peak sintering temperature and fine finger double printing technology. We have further shown that the conversion efficiency of the n‐type bifacial c‐Si solar cells can be improved to be over 21.3% by taking a reasonable high emitter sheet resistance. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.