Corneal biomechanical properties: Precision and influence on tonometry

PurposeTo assess the precision and reproducibility of the corneal biomechanical parameters, and their relationships with the intraocular pressure (IOP) measured with the Goldmann tonometer and a noncontact tonometer.MethodsReadings for biomechanical properties and for IOP measured with the Goldmann and noncontact tonometers, were taken on one randomly selected eye of 106 normal subjects, on each one of two measurement sessions. Measurements with the ocular response analyzer (ORA) and the noncontact tonometer were randomized, followed by the measurement of central corneal thickness and with the Goldmann tonometer.ResultsRepeatability coefficients for CCT, corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) in Session 1 were ±0.01 μm, ±3.05 mmHg and ±2.62 mmHg, respectively. The mean CCT, CH, CRF, Goldmann and noncontact tonometry did not vary significantly between sessions. Reproducibility coefficients for CCT, CH and CRF were ±0.02 μm, ±2.19 mmHg and ±1.97 mmHg, respectively. Univariate regression analysis showed that CCT, CH and CRF significantly (P < 0.0001) correlated with the IOP measured with the Goldmann and noncontact tonometers (and with the differences between tonometers) in Session 1. There were no significant correlations with the differences between tonometers in Session 2. Multivariate analysis revealed a minimal effect of CCT on Goldmann measurements but a significant effect on those of the noncontact tonometer.ConclusionsMeasurement of the biomechanical properties of the cornea, using the ORA, are repeatable and reproducible, affect Goldmann tonometry less than noncontact tonometry, and have a minimal influence on the difference in measured intraocular pressure between tonometers.     

Intraocular pressure measurement with ocular response analyzer over soft contact lens

PurposeTo compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measured with ocular response analyzer (ORA) with and without soft contact lenses (CL) on eye.MethodsGoldmann correlated intraocular pressure (IOPg) and corneal compensated intraocular pressure (IOPcc) were measured in 56 eyes of 28 subjects without any ocular pathology, using ORA. One eye was fitted with Narafilcon A (1-Day Acuvue True Eye, Johnson & Johnson) and the other eye with Nelfilcon A (Daily AquaComfort Plus, Ciba Vision), each with −3.00D and IOPg and IOPcc were again measured over CL. The variation in the IOP with and without CL was determined.ResultsOut of 28 subjects, 54% (15) were female. Mean age of the subjects was 29.4 ± 9.8 years. Both the IOPg and IOPcc when measured with CL, were found statistically significantly lower than without CL (p < 0.05). In subjects wearing Narafilcon A lens, IOPg and IOPcc were found 0.88 ± 2.04 mmHg and 1.55 ± 2.16 mmHg lower than without CL, respectively. Similarly, with Nelfilcon A lens, IOPg and IOPcc were found to be 1.03 ± 1.93 mmHg and 1.62 ± 3.12 mmHg lower, respectively. IOPcc was highly affected and underestimated by more than 3 mmHg in upto 36% of the subjects.ConclusionMeasurement of IOP over minus (−3.00D) CL with ORA is dependent upon CL properties when measured in normal IOP population. It showed lower IOP over Narafilcon A and Nelfilcon A soft CL in comparison to the pressures measured without lenses. IOPg was found less affected by CL. For the accurate measurement of IOP with ORA, CL should be removed.     

RGP contact lens fitting in keratoconus using FITSCAN technology

PurposeTo assess and compare the base curve (BC) of rigid gas permeable contact lens (RGP) that were calculated by FITSCAN using corneal topography (Orbscan IIz) and the diagnostic contact lens fitting method in keratoconus eyes.Materials and methodsA prospective comparative study of 85 keratoconus eyes was conducted. Two masked observers calculated the contact lens parameters of RGP lens by diagnostic fitting method and using FITSCAN technology. The base curves calculated by two methods were compared using Wilcoxon signed rank test and agreement between two methods were analysed using Bland–Altman plot.ResultsEighty-five eyes from 55 keratoconus patients were included in the study. The mean age was 17.63 ± 2.78 (range: 12–23) years and among them 46 were males. The keratoconus was graded into mild, moderate and severe based on average keratometry values. The base curve calculated by the FITSCAN is on average 0.22 mm higher than that calculated by diagnostic method (P value <0.0001, 95% CI = 0.155, 0.245, Wilcoxon signed rank test) and the bias between the two methods was found to be 2.7% (Bland–Altman plot), indicating systematic bias between the two modalities. By single linear regression analysis, the base curve of RGP contact lens could calculated by using the formula, base curve (BC) = (FITSCAN calculated BC × 0.86563) + 0.78738.ConclusionOur study showed that selecting the BC of the initial trial lens 0.22 mm steeper than the FITSCAN calculated base curve, may help to reduce the complexity of RGP contact lens fitting in keratoconus.     

The relationship between measurement method and corneal structure on apparent intraocular pressure in glaucoma and ocular hypertension

PurposeTo analyse the relationship between measured intraocular pressure (IOP) and central corneal thickness (CCT), corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) in ocular hypertension (OHT), primary open-angle (POAG) and normal tension glaucoma (NTG) eyes using multiple tonometry devices.MethodsRight eyes of patients diagnosed with OHT (n = 47), normal tension glaucoma (n = 17) and POAG (n = 50) were assessed. IOP was measured in random order with four devices: Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT); Pascal^® dynamic contour tonometer (DCT); Reichert^® ocular response analyser (ORA); and Tono-Pen^® XL. CCT was then measured using a hand-held ultrasonic pachymeter. CH and CRF were derived from the air pressure to corneal reflectance relationship of the ORA data.ResultsCompared to the GAT, the Tonopen and ORA Goldmann equivalent (IOPg) and corneal compensated (IOPcc) measured higher IOP readings (F = 19.351, p < 0.001), particularly in NTG (F = 12.604, p < 0.001). DCT was closest to Goldmann IOP and had the lowest variance. CCT was significantly different (F = 8.305, p < 0.001) between the 3 conditions as was CH (F = 6.854, p = 0.002) and CRF (F = 19.653, p < 0.001). IOPcc measures were not affected by CCT. The DCT was generally not affected by corneal biomechanical factors.ConclusionThis study suggests that as the true pressure of the eye cannot be determined non-invasively, measurements from any tonometer should be interpreted with care, particularly when alterations in the corneal tissue are suspected.     

Corneal changes following short-term miniscleral contact lens wear

PurposeTo examine the influence of short-term miniscleral contact lens wear on corneal shape, thickness and anterior surface aberrations.MethodsScheimpflug imaging was captured before, immediately following and 3 h after a short period (3 h) of miniscleral contact lens wear for 10 young (mean 27 ± 5 years), healthy participants. Natural diurnal variations were considered by measuring baseline diurnal changes obtained on a separate control day without contact lens wear.ResultsSmall but significant anterior corneal flattening was observed immediately following lens removal (overall mean 0.02 ± 0.03 mm, p < 0.001) which returned to baseline levels 3 h after lens removal. During the 3 h recovery period significant corneal thinning (−13.4 ± 10.5 μm) and posterior surface flattening (0.03 ± 0.02 mm) were also observed (both p < 0.01). The magnitude of posterior corneal flattening during recovery correlated with the amount of corneal thinning (r = 0.69, p = 0.03). Central corneal clearance (maximum tear reservoir depth) was not associated with corneal swelling following lens removal (r = −0.24, p > 0.05). An increase in lower-order corneal astigmatism Z(2,2) was also observed following lens wear (mean −0.144 ± 0.075 μm, p = 0.02).ConclusionsFlattening of the anterior corneal surface was observed immediately following lens wear, while ‘rebound’ thinning and flattening of the posterior surface was evident following the recovery period. Modern miniscleral contact lenses that vault the cornea may slightly influence corneal shape and power but do not induce clinically significant corneal oedema during short-term wear.     

In vitro power profiles of daily disposable contact lenses

PurposeTo evaluate and compare the distribution of refractive power within the optic zone of different soft contact lenses and to investigate the effect of lens decentration on the power profiles.MethodsThe Nimo TR1504 instrument was used to measure the optical power across different aperture diameters (from 1.5 mm to 5.5 mm in steps of 0.5 mm) of four daily disposable contact lenses: DAILIES TOTAL1, Proclear 1-Day, SofLens daily disposable and 1-DAY ACUVUE MOIST. Measurements were performed using a wet cell. Power data were evaluated when contact lenses were in its centered position and after inducing different amounts of lens decentration (from 0.2 mm to 1.0 mm in steps of 0.2 mm).ResultsAll contact lenses showed an increase – more negative – in lens power with distance from the lens center. The amount of change varied depending on the lens. It was about 10% of lens power for DAILIES TOTAL1 (−0.29 diopters (D)), SofLens daily disposable (−0.36 D), and Proclear 1-Day (−0.32 D) whereas 1-DAY ACUVUE MOIST showed a percentage variation of 3.3% (−0.10 D). After inducing a lens decentration up to 1 mm, the power curves were shifted in the negative direction. However, the change obtained in lens power compared with well-centered position was always lower than a quarter of diopter both for all the lenses and aperture diameters.ConclusionsOur results showed a variation of the refractive power from the lens center, becoming more negative toward the periphery, with a negligible effect of the decentration for all disposable contact lenses studied.     

Comparison of conventional method of contact lens fitting and software based contact lens fitting with Medmont corneal topographer in eyes with corneal scar

PurposeTo compare conventional method of contact lens fitting with software based contact lens fitting using Medmont corneal topographer in eyes with nebular and macular corneal scars.MethodsFifteen participants who were diagnosed with nebular and macular scars were fitted with rigid gas permeable lenses using conventional method of contact lens fitting. During the lens dispensing visit, participants underwent Medmont corneal topography. Agreement between the two methods of contact lens fitting was studied.ResultsParameters of contact lenses which were concluded using conventional method was compared to that of software based fitting. Mean difference in base curve of contact lens between the two methods was 0.094 mm ± 0.147 mm (95% CI: +0.383 to −0.194). Mean difference in diameter of contact lens between the two methods was 0.16 mm ± 0.172 mm (95% CI: +0.497 to −0.177). Contact lens parameters that were achieved using two different methods of fitting showed good correlation. Correlation coefficients, as comparison of two methods in base curve and diameter were 0.96 (P < 0.05) and 0.94 (P < 0.05), respectively.ConclusionSoftware based contact lens fitting would be useful for contact lens practitioners to predict initial base curve of contact lens in corneal scars.     

Efficacy of spherical aberration correction based on contact lens power

PurposeTo investigate the efficacy of spherical aberration (SA) correction with aspheric contact lenses (aspheric lenses) based on lens power, and compare the results with those of spherical contact lenses (spherical lenses).MethodsOcular higher-order aberrations were measured with a wavefront sensor, in 11 myopic subjects wearing an aspheric lens (Medalist Fresh fit (PUREVISION 2 HD); Bausch + Lomb) or a spherical lens (ACUVUE Oasys; Johnson & Johnson). Six different lens powers (−7.00 diopters (D), −5.00 D, −3.00 D, −1.00 D, +1.00 D, +3.00 D) were used for all subjects. The amount of SA correction from the contact lens at each power was calculated as the difference between SA with the contact lens on-eye and SA of the eye alone.ResultsFor the spherical lenses, SA correction was close to 0.00 μm for the +1.00 D lens, became more positive as the labeled lens power increased and became more negative as the labeled lens power decreased. For the aspheric lenses, SA correction was consistent, from −0.15 to −0.05 μm, for all lens powers except for the −1.00 D lens. SA correction for the spherical and aspheric lenses was significantly different at −7.00 D (p = 0.040), −3.00 D (p = 0.015), −1.00 D (p < 0.001), +1.00 D (p = 0.006), and +3.00 D (p < 0.001) powers.ConclusionAn aspheric lens is capable of correcting SA at different lens powers, and has SA correction in the range of −0.15 to −0.05 μm over a 6 mm aperture.     

Assessment of corneal endothelial cell density in patients with keratoconus not using contact lenses

PurposeTo assess the corneal endothelial cell density (ECD) in keratoconus patients with no history of contact lens use.SettingYuzuncu Yil University, School of Medicine and Van Training and Research Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology, Van, Turkey.DesignCross-sectional controlled study.MethodsThe eyes of 65 patients with the diagnosis of keratoconus with no history of contact lens wear and the eyes of 40 healthy controls were prospectively examined using the Heidelberg Retinal Tomography Rostock Cornea Module (HRT3/RCM). The average ECD from the two groups were then compared.ResultsOf the cases with keratoconus, 44 (67.7%) were men and 21 (32.3%) were women. The mean age was 20.9 ± 6.8 (range = 10–41) years. Of the controls, 28 (70%) were men and 12 (30%) were women. The mean age was 23.9 ± 5.8 (range = 14–35) years. Of the 65 eyes with keratoconus, 19 (29.2%) had mild keratoconus, 21 (32.3%) had moderate keratoconus, and 25 (38.5%) had severe keratoconus. The mean ECD was 2731.6 ± 303.2 cells/mm² in cases with keratoconus and 2664.9 ± 319.5 cells/mm² in controls. There was no difference between the densities (unpaired t-test, P = 0.4). No significant relationships were found between the ECD data and central corneal thickness or steepest keratometric.ConclusionsEndothelial cell density was unaltered in keratoconic patients without a history of contact lens use when compared with healthy controls. Change in ECD is independent from the central corneal thickness and the stage of keratoconus.     

Agreement and reliability in measuring central corneal thickness with a rotating Scheimpflug–Placido system and ultrasound pachymetry

PurposeWe compare the agreement and the reliability in measuring central corneal thickness (CCT) using two different technologies.MethodThe right eyes of 35 healthy individuals who had a negative history of ophthalmic disease, or ocular surgery were examined. The CCT was determined sequentially with a rotating Scheimpflug camera (Sirius; CSO), and an ultrasound pachymeter (P-1; Takagi). For statistical analysis, we used the methods suggested by Bland and Altman.ResultsThe mean values of CCT obtained from Sirius, and ultrasound were 537 ± 28 μm, and 550 ± 35 μm, respectively. There was a high correlation between Sirius and ultrasound (r = 0.92; p < 0.001), but the difference between the two measurements was statistically significant (t = −5.7; p < 0.00001). The precision of Sirius and ultrasound were 9.4 and 15.9 μm; repeatability 13.3 and 22.4 μm, and coefficient of variation 0.9% and 1.5%, respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.97 for Sirius and 0.95 for ultrasound.ConclusionsThe average difference between corneal thickness measured with Sirius and ultrasound pachymetry was small but clinically significant. This means that the two instruments cannot be used interchangeably. Sirius showed precision and repeatability almost twice as much as ultrasound pachymetry. Confidence interval of 13.3 μm for Sirius can show variations in corneal thickness with an uncertainty value lower than 2.5% in 95% of cases. The simplicity of use, the possibility to obtain pachymetric maps, and less invasiveness make this instrument potentially useful in contact lens practice.     

Predicting success with silicone-hydrogel contact lenses in new wearers

Purposeto evaluate changes in tear metrics and ocular signs induced by six months of silicone-hydrogel contact lens wear and the difference in baseline characteristics between those who successfully continued in contact lens wear compared to those that did not.MethodsNon-invasive Keratograph, Tearscope and fluorescein tear break-up times (TBUTs), tear meniscus height, bulbar and limbal hyperaemia, lid-parallel conjunctival folds (LIPCOF), phenol red thread, fluorescein and lissamine-green staining, and lid wiper epitheliopathy were measured on 60 new contact lens wearers fitted with monthly silicone-hydrogels (average age 36 ± 14 years, 40 females). Symptoms were evaluated by the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI). After six months full time contact lens wear the above metrics were re-measured on those patients still in contact lens wear (n = 33). The initial measurements were also compared between the group still wearing lenses after six months and those who had ceased lens wear (n = 27).ResultsThere were significant changes in tear meniscus height (p = 0.031), bulbar hyperaemia (p = 0.011), fluorescein TBUT (p = 0.027), corneal (p = 0.007) and conjunctival (p = 0.009) staining, LIPCOF (p = 0.011) and lid wiper epitheliopathy (p = 0.002) after six months of silicone-hydrogel wear. Successful wearers had a higher non-invasive (17.0 ± 8.2 s vs 12.0 ± 5.6 s; p = 0.001) and fluorescein (10.7 ± 6.4 s vs 7.5 ± 4.7 s; p = 0.001) TBUT than drop-outs, although OSDI (cut-off 4.2) was also a strong predictor of success.ConclusionSilicone-hydrogel lenses induced significant changes in the tear film and ocular surface as well as lid margin staining. Wettability of the ocular surface is the main factor affecting contact lens drop-out.     

Long-term changes in straylight induced by corneal refractive therapy: A pilot study

PurposeTo assess long-term intraocular straylight changes induced by corneal refractive therapy (CRT) and to determine whether these changes persist after cessation of CRT lens wear.MethodsA single-center, prospective, longitudinal study was performed in 22 subjects (group 1) undergoing overnight corneal refractive therapy for 1 year. Ten right eyes of 10 subjects (group 2) with emmetropia served as controls. In each subject, high contrast visual acuity (HCVA), manifest refraction and intraocular straylight were determined at several time points during treatment and 1 month after discontinuing treatment. Straylight was measured using the van den Berg straylight meter (third generation). EDTRS charts (logMAR units) were used to assess HCVA. For both groups, only data for the right eyes were analyzed.ResultsStraylight (mean ± standard deviation) significantly fell from baseline (0.98 ± 0.13) to values recorded after 1 month (0.88 ± 0.13, p = 0.011), 3 months (0.88 ± 0.13, p = 0.004), 6 months (0.88 ± 0.13, p = 0.000) and 12 months (0.76 ± 0.12, p = 0.003) of treatment. One month after discontinuing CRT lens wear, straylight was still significantly lower than baseline (0.89 ± 0.13, p = 0.003). No correlations were observed between intraocular straylight and HCVA.ConclusionsGood refractive outcomes and reductions in straylight were observed in response to corneal refractive therapy for myopia. The reduction in straylight observed after discontinuing CRT warrents further investigation.     

The effect of tinted soft contact lens wear on functional visual acuity and higher-order aberrations

PurposeTo investigate the differences of functional visual acuity (FVA) and high order aberrations (HOAs) in relation to tinted and clear hydrogel soft contact lens (SCL) wear.MethodsA prospective comparative study was performed in 16 eyes of 16 healthy volunteers. Dynamic visual acuity (using a FVA measurement system) and higher-order aberrations (using a wavefront sensor) were compared in subjects wearing two types of soft contact lenses: 1-day Acuvue^® (Vistakon, Jacksonville, FL) clear and the 1-day Acuvue^® Define^TM (Vistakon, Jacksonville, FL) tinted lens. The blink rates were recorded during FVA testing. The correlation between the difference of HOAs and differences in FVA values was analyzed.ResultsThe mean LogMAR FVA scores with clear and tinted SCLs were 0.07 ± 0.13 and 0.14 ± 0.17 (P < 0.05). The mean blink frequencies with clear and tinted SCL wear were 18.4 ± 8.3 and 25.3 ± 4.7 blinks/min (P < 0.05). Both 3rd-order aberrations and total HOAs showed statistically significant differences between the two types of soft contact lenses for 6 mm pupil measurements (P < 0.05). A significant positive linear correlation was observed between ΔHOAs and ΔLogMAR FVA for 6 mm pupil measurements (R = 0.53, P = 0.04).ConclusionsTinted contact lens wear appears to induce a reduction in optical quality. Functional visual acuity measurement is a useful procedure to study the changes of visual performance and quality in tinted contact lens wear.     

The influence of lens power and center thickness on the intraocular pressure measured through soft lenses: a comparison of two noncontact tonometers

PurposeTo quantify the influence of soft contact lens power and thickness on the intraocular pressure (IOP).MethodsThirty-nine young, healthy adult volunteers completed this study. One eye of each subject was randomly assigned either a +6D or a ?6D high water content daily disposable lens. The other eye was fitted with the second lens. Triplicate measurements of IOP were taken before, during, and after contact lens wear. Each time, IOP was assessed in a randomized order with two noncontact tonometers. The lenses were swapped between eyes during a second session of measurements, one week later.ResultsIn the first session with the +6D lenses, the average IOPs (±SDs) before, with the lenses fitted, and after the lenses were removed, were: 14.3 ± 2.9 mmHg, 17.0 ± 3.3 mmHg and 13.9 ± 3.1 mmHg, respectively, for the CT80 and 13.6 ± 3.1 mmHg, 17.1 ± 4.5 mmHg and 13.3 ± 2.9 mmHg, respectively, for the PT100. The corresponding values for the first session with the ?6D lenses were: 14.3 ± 3.1 mmHg, 13.1 ± 3.1 mmHg and 14.1 ± 3.3 mmHg, respectively, for the CT80 and 13.6 ± 3.2 mmHg, 13.0 ± 3.0 mmHg and 13.6 ± 3.2 mmHg, respectively, for the PT100. IOP significantly (P < 0.05) increased (+ΔIOP = 2.7 ± 0.4 mmHg with the CT80 in the first session) with the +6D lenses, but decreased (P < 0.05) when the ?6D lenses were fitted (?ΔIOP = 0.6 ± 0.2 mmHg with the PT100 in the first session). The soft contact lens-induced changes were consistent between sessions but varied between tonometers.ConclusionsThe measurement of IOP through soft contact lenses resulted in consistent, statistically significant differences in IOP, which were not uniform across tonometers and which did not appear to be solely related to the central thickness of the soft contact lenses.     

Evaluation of central corneal thickness after cataract surgery,penetrating keratoplasty and long-term soft contact lens wear

PurposeThe aim of this study was to compare central corneal thickness (CCT) between corneas of normal healthy eyes (cNHE), corneas of eyes that had undergone cataract surgery by clear corneal phacoemulsification with implantation of an intracapsular intraocular lens (cIOL), corneal grafts after penetrating keratoplasty (gPK) and corneas of long-term soft contact lens wearers (cCL).MethodsThe study design was a consecutive cross-sectional trial. CCT was measured using rotating Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam, software version 1.16r04) in 80 cNHE, 79 cIOL, 46 gPK and 78 cCL. Analysis of variance (one-way ANOVA) was performed to compare differences of mean values between these four groups. Pearson's or Spearman's correlation coefficient (r) was determined between CCT value and age, follow up time after penetrating keratoplasty (timePK) or contact lens wearing time (timeCL).ResultsMeans of CCT measurements were comparable between cNHE (mean CCT ± standard deviation, 554 ± 36 μm), cIOL (551 ± 40 μm) and gPK (534 ± 52 μm) as determined by one-way ANOVA. Mean CCT values in cCL (537 ± 37 μm) were statistically significantly lower in comparison to cNHE (p = 0.026, 95% CI = 1.43–31.44). There was no linear correlation between age and CCT values of cNHE and cIOL (p = 0.841, r = −0.031 and p = 0.931, r = 0.011, respectively). No linear relationship was determined between CCT values of cCL and timeCL (p = 0.315, r = −0.125). CCT values of gPK did not correlate with timePK (p = 0.738, r = 0.054).ConclusionsThe data reported here indicate that in the same statistical model among CCT values of cNHE, cIOL and gPK only long-term soft contact lenses (CL) wearer have significantly lower CCT measurements.     

Scleral contact lenses for visual rehabilitation after penetrating keratoplasty: Long term outcomes

PurposeTo evaluate the success rate of highly gas permeable scleral contact lenses (SCL) for visual rehabilitation after penetrating keratoplasty (PK), over a period of up to 9 years.MethodsA total database of 31 consecutive patient fitted with SCL between January 2004 and December 2009 was retrospectively reviewed. Demographic data, etiology prior to lens fitting, visual outcomes, follow up time and complications were analyzed.ResultsAll eyes were fitted due to inadequate spectacle-corrected vision after successful penetrating keratoplasty or failure of other contact lens modalities. Out of 31 patients fitted, 28 (33 eyes) continue to wear SCL for periods between 0.5 and 8.8 years. The mean duration of follow-up after contact lens fitting was 5.2 ± 2.2 years. The mean age of corneal graft was 17.6 ± 11.4 years (range 4.3–42), and the mean interval between PK and initial contact lens fitting was 12.2 ± 10.7 years (range 0.7–36.0). The average steepest keratometry of our cohort was 55.0 ± 7.5 diopter (D) and the refractive astigmatism was 8.0 ± 4.4 D. The mean contact lens corrected visual acuity (BCVAcl) was 0.78 ± 0.25 (range 0.3–1.2). Twenty-three (82%) patients achieved a functional vision of 0.5 or more.During the studied period, ten (30.0%) eyes presented at least one graft rejection episode and two eyes (6%) had an episode of microbial keratitis. Corneal transplants of 20 years or more show a higher rate of refits due to ectasia recurrence.ConclusionsScleral lenses should be considered as lens of choice in eyes with complex corneal geometry, as besides visual rehabilitation, their use may delay or prevent further surgical involvement.     

Lens parameter changes under in vitro and ex vivo conditions and their effect on the conjunctiva

PurposeTo quantify changes in contact lens parameters induced by lens wear and determine whether these changes are associated with contact lens-induced conjunctival staining (CLICS).MethodsIn vitro: Lens diameter, sag, edge shape, base curve of six contact lens brands (balafilcon, comfilcon, etafilcon, lotrafilcon B, omafilcon and senofilcon) measured at 21 °C and 35 °C (eye temperature). Ex vivo: Diameter of lenses collected from a prospective, randomised, contra-lateral, cross-over clinical trial from 36 subjects wearing all lens types for 1 week daily wear, measured in 35 °C PBS after removal. Ocular surface was examined for lens-induced conjunctival staining by masked examiner.ResultsIn vitro: Changes in diameter and base curve outside ISO tolerance were found with etafilcon A and omafilcon A. Ex vivo: Comfilcon A and etafilcon A had greatest shrinkage in diameter (0.18 mm) and base curve (0.11 mm steeper) with temperature increase from 21 °C to 35 °C. Senofilcon A, lotrafilcon B and balafilcon A maintained most stable parameters between 21 °C and 35 °C. Changes in diameter and base curve from lens wear were not correlated with CLICS (p > 0.49). Multivariate analysis showed significantly greater levels of lens induced staining were associated with lens modulus (p < 0.001) and knife (p < 0.001) and chisel (p < 0.001) edge shapes.ConclusionsParameter changes induced by lens wear were associated with increasing temperature, but these changes in lens diameter and base curve did not induce CLICS. Modulus and edge shape were associated with increased CLICS. The susceptibility of etafilcon A and omafilcon A lenses to parameter changes might be related to their high water content.     

Corneal swelling caused by conventional and new-design low-Dk soft contact lenses following a 10-day daily wear trial regime

PurposeTo investigate the efficacy and safety of a fenestrated and channelled soft contact lens (F-SCL) compared to a standard and non-fenestrated soft contact lens (S-SCL) in experienced soft contact lens (SCL) wearers.MethodsThis was a randomised, crossover, single-blinded (subject), and multicentre clinical trial. Sixteen experienced SCL wearers were randomly divided into two groups (FS and SF). The FS group first wore F-SCLs followed by S-SCLs, each for 10 days, separated by a 1-week washout period, whereas the SF group wore the S-SCLs first and crossed over to F-SCLs in the same manner. The F-SCLs were designed with three equally spaced, symmetrical fenestrations and a partial-thickness, connecting, circumferential channel on the back surface of the mid-periphery of the lens. Measurement of central corneal thickness using ultrasonic pachymetry was performed on the day of screening, after the 1-week washout period, and after 10 days of wearing each kind of lens, based on which central corneal swelling was calculated and compared. One eye in each subject was chosen at random for analysis.ResultsCentral corneal swelling was 1.92 ± 1.73% vs. 5.26 ± 2.14% in F-SCLs vs. S-SCLs wearers, which was statistically significant (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of SCL-corrected visual acuity or SCL-related adverse events.ConclusionThe use of F-SCLs led to reduced corneal swelling compared to S-SCLs. The newly incorporated features appear to improve tear mixing and thereby the oxygen supply to the cornea, which results in reduced corneal oedema.     

Which soft contact lens power is better for piggyback fitting in keratoconus?

PurposeTo evaluate the impact of differente soft contact lens power in the anterior corneal curvature and regularity in subjects with keratoconus.MethodsNineteen subjects (30 eyes) with keratoconus were included in the study. Six corneal topographies were taken with Pentacam Eye System over the naked eye and successively with soft lens (Senofilcon A) powers of −3.00, −1.50, 0.00, +1.50 and +3.00 D. Corneal measurements of mean central keratometry (MCK), maximum tangential curvature (TK), maximum front elevation (MFE) and eccentricity (Ecc) at 6 and 8 mm diameters as well as anterior corneal surface high order aberrations (i.e. total RMS, spherical- and coma-like and secondary astigmatism) were evaluated.ResultsNegative- and plano-powered soft lenses flattened (p < 0.05 in all cases), whereas positive-powered lenses did not induce any significant changes (p > 0.05 in all cases) in MCK in comparison to the naked eye. The TK power decreased with negative lenses (p < 0.05 in both cases) and increased with +3.00 D lenses (p = 0.03) in comparison to the naked eye. No statistically significant differences were found in MFE with any soft lens power in comparison to the naked eye (p > 0.05 in all cases). Corneal eccentricity increased at 8 mm diameter for all lens powers (p < 0.05 in all cases). No statistically differences were found in HOA RMS and spherical-like aberration (both p > 0.05). Statistically differences were found in coma-like and secondary astigmatism (both p < 0.05).ConclusionNegative-powered soft contact lenses provide a flatter anterior surface in comparison to positive-powered lenses in subjects with keratoconus and thus they might be more suitable for piggyback contact lens fitting.     

Clinical performance and “ex vivo” dehydration of silicone hydrogel contact lenses with two new multipurpose solutions

PurposeTo compare the performance of two novel multipurpose disinfecting solutions (MPDS) in preventing silicone hydrogel contact lens dehydration, provide higher scores of subjective comfort and stable optical quality during a month of lens wear in neophyte volunteers.MethodThis is a prospective, double-blind, contralateral and randomised study involving the contra lateral use of Complete RevitaLens^® and Biotrue MPDS. Twenty-five neophytes wore Air Optix Aqua for 1 month. Volunteers were evaluated on day 1 and day 30 at 2 and 10 h after lens insertion. Tear film stability using Tearscope Plus (Keeler, UK), whole eye aberrations for 4.5 mm pupil size (IRx3, ImaginEyes, France) and subjective comfort (0–10 score) along with the dehydration values obtained with a gravimetric method were collected at each follow-up visit.ResultsNIBUT values decreased significantly with both care systems from baseline to 10 h visit on day 1 (p = 0.032 and 0.016, mean difference = −6.7 s and −7.0 s, for Complete Revitalens and Biotrue, respectively). Dehydration rates and ocular aberrations did not change significantly over the month of follow-up (p > 0.05, ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc corrections), nor between visits within the same day (p > 0.05, paired sample T-test). End-of-day dryness sensation worsened similarly with both MPDS after 1 month (p = 0.021 and 0.005, mean difference = −1.4 and −1.3, for Complete Revitalens and Biotrue, respectively).ConclusionsRegardless of their different chemical compositions in terms of moisture additives both MPDS solutions evaluated performed similarly regarding objective measures of dehydration, tear stability and optical quality but presented significant differences in subjective symptoms.