Patterns of fitting cosmetically tinted contact lenses

Cosmetically tinted soft contact lenses are an attractive option for contact lens wearers. Data that we have gathered from annual contact lens fitting surveys demonstrate that those wearing tinted lenses are more likely to be female (4.6% of all soft lenses fitted vs. 1.6% for males; p < 0.0001) and younger (27 ± 11 years vs. 33 ± 13 years for those wearing non-tinted lenses; p < 0.0001). Tinted lenses tend to be worn more on a part-time basis and are replaced less frequently than non-tinted lenses. The decline in fitting tinted lenses over the past 12 years may be due to (a) the current limited availability of tinted lenses in silicone hydrogel materials and daily disposable replacement frequencies, which together represent a significant majority (78%) of new soft lenses fits today, (b) growing concerns among lens wearers and practitioners relating to the risks of complications associated with the wearing of tinted lenses, and (c) reduced promotion of such lenses by the contact lens industry.     

Efficacy of spherical aberration correction based on contact lens power

PurposeTo investigate the efficacy of spherical aberration (SA) correction with aspheric contact lenses (aspheric lenses) based on lens power, and compare the results with those of spherical contact lenses (spherical lenses).MethodsOcular higher-order aberrations were measured with a wavefront sensor, in 11 myopic subjects wearing an aspheric lens (Medalist Fresh fit (PUREVISION 2 HD); Bausch + Lomb) or a spherical lens (ACUVUE Oasys; Johnson & Johnson). Six different lens powers (−7.00 diopters (D), −5.00 D, −3.00 D, −1.00 D, +1.00 D, +3.00 D) were used for all subjects. The amount of SA correction from the contact lens at each power was calculated as the difference between SA with the contact lens on-eye and SA of the eye alone.ResultsFor the spherical lenses, SA correction was close to 0.00 μm for the +1.00 D lens, became more positive as the labeled lens power increased and became more negative as the labeled lens power decreased. For the aspheric lenses, SA correction was consistent, from −0.15 to −0.05 μm, for all lens powers except for the −1.00 D lens. SA correction for the spherical and aspheric lenses was significantly different at −7.00 D (p = 0.040), −3.00 D (p = 0.015), −1.00 D (p < 0.001), +1.00 D (p = 0.006), and +3.00 D (p < 0.001) powers.ConclusionAn aspheric lens is capable of correcting SA at different lens powers, and has SA correction in the range of −0.15 to −0.05 μm over a 6 mm aperture.     

Axis-free correction of astigmatism using bifocal soft contact lenses

Purpose

Pilot study to investigate the feasibility of an axis-free correction approach of regular astigmatism using soft, bifocal contact lenses (CL).

Clinical evaluation of infrared autorefractors for use in contact lens over refraction

We examined the ability of autorefractors to provide an accurate means of contact lens over-refraction measurement. Over-refraction measures, performed using six commercially available automated infrared autorefractors and retinoscopy, were compared with subjective refraction. A total of 40 contact lens wearers (20 soft lens wearers and 20 rigid gas permeable (RGP) lens wearers) participated in the study. All six autorefractors were able to provide over-refraction measures in all subjects. Data analysis revealed differences in autorefractor performance between the two types of contact lens wearer with greater accuracy and lower variability being found in the soft lens wearing subjects compared with the RGP group. The level of agreement between retinoscopy and subjective over-refraction results was lower in soft lens wear and higher in RGP wear than the levels found between the autorefractor and subjective over-refraction measures. We conclude that autorefractors provide a useful means of measuring contact lens over-refraction in soft lens wearers. Over-refraction results should be treated more cautiously in RGP wearers.     

单眼视接触镜对视功能的影响

单眼视(Monovjsiori)作为矫正老视的方法之一，其机理是用接触镜将一眼矫正为看远,而另一眼矫正为看近,因此使用单眼视方法会人为的造成双眼的屈光参差。这种由离焦产生的横糊会对视功能产生一定的影响。本文从空间视觉、调节及其长期影响三方面讨论了使用单眼视方法对法对视功能的影响。以期为临床应用堤供叁考。     

Treatment of corneal dellen with a large diameter soft contact lens

A 58-year-old man presented with corneal dellen twelve days after pterygium removal on his left eye. Initial treatment with lubrication and artificial tears was unsuccessful. The fitting of a conventional contact lens was not possible because of conjuctival chemosis. Additionally the patient denied eye patching due to professional reasons. As an alternative treatment a large diameter bandage soft contact lens approved for extended wear was applied ((David Thomas Contact Lens T74/85 Extended Wear/Bandage of 18 mm diameter). The next day corneal dellen had already began to retreat and four days later the contact lens was removed since there was no sign of dellen in the slit lamp examination. In conclusion, the use of a large diameter soft contact lens was an effective alternative solution for the treatment of corneal dellen in our patient.     

The therapeutic and optical application of a rigid gas permeable semi-limbal diameter contact lens

Purpose

To evaluate the therapeutic and optical application of a semi-limbal diameter (S-LIM) rigid gas permeable (RGP) contact lens.

Method

A retrospective non-comparative case series of 14 consecutive patients (22 eyes) who were referred to one senior optometrist for the fitting of S-LIM contact lenses at Moorfields Eye Hospital. The cases comprised of 11 patients (17 eyes) with keratoconus, 1 patient (2 eyes) post-surgical ectasia from previous LASIK, 1 (1 eye) post-graft patient, and 1 patient (2 eyes) who required corneal protection secondary to lagophthalmos. These patients had failed previously with other lens designs because of lens intolerance, unstable vision, chronic 3 and 9 o’clock corneal staining, and inadequate corneal protection for the patient with lagophthalmos. A conventional method of using diagnostic lenses with fluorescein assessment was adopted in fitting the S-LIM lenses.

Results

The median duration of problems encountered with previous lenses was 4 years (range 0.5-10 years). The median visual acuity with the S-LIM lens was 6/9 (range 6/5-6/24). A median of 1 diagnostic lens (range 1-3 lenses) was required to achieve a satisfactory fit. At the last recorded follow-up, 10 patients (14 eyes) had no clinically observable problem and were wearing their lenses with a median wearing time of 8 h per day (range 1-18 h). The median duration of follow up was 6 months (range 2-18 months). One patient (1 eye) abandoned lens wear because of satisfactory unaided vision.

Conclusion

The use of a semi-limbal diameter lens can be an effective modality in patients with intolerance to other lens designs. However, lens modification from the standard design and the use of ocula lubricants are often required to optimise lens fit and to enhance tolerance.     

How often are contact lenses worn?

There are important clinical, academic and commercial reasons for seeking to develop a comprehensive understanding of the frequency of wear of different forms of contact lenses. Data that we have gathered from annual contact lens fitting surveys over the past 12 years demonstrate that contact lenses are worn, on average, 5.4 ± 1.9 days per week. Rigid lenses tended to be worn on a full-time basis, typically seven days per week. The distribution of daily disposable lens wear is bimodal, with peaks at two days and seven days per week of wear. Over the survey period there appears to have been a small trend toward the use of contact lenses on a part-time basis.     

Contact lens correction of presbyopia

The ageing population highlights the need to provide effective optical solutions for presbyopic contact lens wearers. However, data gathered from annual contact lens fitting surveys demonstrate that fewer than 40% of contact lens wearers over 45 years of age (virtually all of whom can be presumed to suffer a partial or complete loss of accommodation) are prescribed a presbyopic correction. Furthermore, monovision is prescribed as frequently as multifocal lenses. These observations suggest that an optimal solution to the contact lens correction of presbyopia remains elusive.